Winning the efficiencies 27th March 2014 - World Waste to Energy … · 2016. 5. 11. · Flare...
Transcript of Winning the efficiencies 27th March 2014 - World Waste to Energy … · 2016. 5. 11. · Flare...
-
Submitted to
World Waste to Energy City
Summit 2016
10th – 11th May 2016
John OrdBusiness Director – Thermal
Power & Energy Networks
-
• When is a grid connection not a grid connection?
• Tariffs for balancing and stability
• Synergies between Macro and Micro
• Smart Operation – Realising grid tariff revenue
• Making the most of what you have…
-
AD PlantMT Plant
ATT Plant
Grid Connection
DNO DNO
X
STG GEsS/B gen
XX
X
-
AD PlantMT Plant
ATT Plant
Grid Connection
DNO DNO
X
STG GEsS/B gen
XX
X
Increasing
Fault
Level
Maximum
Fault Level
-
Direction of travelLocalised demand side energy management | Localised grid stability
Localised smart grids | Incentivisation at the DNO level
Localised Energy Storage to provide local power to the local grid
when it is needed
-
Localised power
solutions to meet local
network demands
-
Centralised to de-centralised
power generation
-
Programme Value/MW/yr Response time Run Duration MT Plant AD Plant ATT Plant
Cost avoidance programmes, benefit available through supply contracts from shifting load or using onsite generators
1. Triad avoidance £25-40k 4-6 hours warning 30-90 minutes YES YES YES ?
2. Red DUoS £35-140k Pre-determined 3-3.5 hours YES YES YES ?
3. Peak lopping £20k Pre-determined 3 hours YES YES NO
Network Balancing Services – responding to external signal from network operator within time constraints
4. STOR £20k-30k < 20 mins20-240 mins, but
usually < 60 minsYES YES NO
5. FFR Static
Secondary£30k < 30s < 30 mins YES YES NO
5. FFR High
(dynamic)£55k < 30s
Unlimited, but
usually < 30 minsYES YES NO
6. FCDM > £60k Instantaneous < 30 mins YES YES NO
8. DSBR
£10k set up +
energy @ >
£250/MWh
> 1 hour 2-4 hours YES YES NO
Capacity Support – Payment in return for ensuring response delivered following signal from ISO
9. Capacity Market
(main)
£19,400 for 2018/19
(2012 money) Pre-determined 4 hours YES YES YES
-
Peak load generator
relatively fast response
rate
Transmission system
Local Distribution
Users
Base load generator
relatively slow
response rate
Steam
Turbine
Nuclear Power
Plant
Site HV
Network
Transmission
Network
Gas
Engine
Gas fired
CCGT
Distribution
Network
Site LV
Network
Local usersMotors / fans
etc.
National
Infrastructure
EfW site
Infrastructure
National Grid direction of travel holds true for Site Grid optimisation
-
Gas booster Gas enginesPower
GenerationBiogas
Flare
Gas storage Gas booster
Typical current MBT arrangement
Gas Stored to
maintain minimum
storage volume
Gas engines operate in
response to pressure
changes in gas storage
Revenue
changes as
engines come on
and off line and
as prices varies
Flare not
normally
used
-
Gas booster Gas enginesPower
GenerationBiogas
Flare
Gas storage Gas booster
Typical current MBT arrangement
- 4.00 8.00 12.00 16.00 20.00 24.00
Nm
3/m
in
Time (h)
Flare Operation
- 4.00 8.00 12.00 16.00 20.00 24.00
Nu
mb
er
Time (h)
No. Gas Engines Running
- 4.00 8.00 12.00 16.00 20.00 24.00
Inc
om
e (
£/m
in)
Time (h)
Net Revenue Profile
- 4.00 8.00 12.00 16.00 20.00 24.00
Nm
3
Time (h)
Gas holder volume
-
Gas booster Gas enginesPower
GenerationBiogas
Flare
Gas storage Gas booster
Typical current MBT arrangement
- 4.00 8.00 12.00 16.00 20.00 24.00
Nm
3/m
in
Time (h)
Flare Operation
- 4.00 8.00 12.00 16.00 20.00 24.00
Nu
mb
er
Time (h)
No. Gas Engines Running
- 4.00 8.00 12.00 16.00 20.00 24.00
Inc
om
e (
£/m
in)
Time (h)
Net Revenue Profile
- 4.00 8.00 12.00 16.00 20.00 24.00
Nm
3
Time (h)
Gas holder volume
Optimised MBT arrangement
Gas booster Gas enginesPower
GenerationBiogas
Flare
Gas storage Gas booster
Gas storage
allowed to drop
during peak times,
storage recovers
after peak
Gas engine operation
changed at peak time to
maximise revenue
Revenue
maximised at
peak times by
running all
available engines
Flare not
normally
used
-
- 4.00 8.00 12.00 16.00 20.00 24.00
Nm
3
Time (h)
Gas holder volume
- 4.00 8.00 12.00 16.00 20.00 24.00
Nu
mb
er
Time (h)
No. Gas Engines Running
Gas booster Gas enginesPower
GenerationBiogas
Flare
Gas storage Gas booster
Typical current MBT arrangement
- 4.00 8.00 12.00 16.00 20.00 24.00
Nm
3/m
in
Time (h)
Flare Operation
- 4.00 8.00 12.00 16.00 20.00 24.00
Inc
om
e (
£/m
in)
Time (h)
Net Revenue Profile
- 4.00 8.00 12.00 16.00 20.00 24.00
Nm
3/m
in
Time (h)
Flare Operation
- 4.00 8.00 12.00 16.00 20.00 24.00
Nu
mb
er
Time (h)
No. Gas Engines Running
- 4.00 8.00 12.00 16.00 20.00 24.00
Inc
om
e (
£/m
in)
Time (h)
Net Revenue Profile
- 4.00 8.00 12.00 16.00 20.00 24.00
Nm
3
Time (h)
Gas holder volume
Optimised MBT arrangement
Gas booster Gas enginesPower
GenerationBiogas
Flare
Gas storage Gas booster
-
- 4.00 8.00 12.00 16.00 20.00 24.00
Nm
3
Time (h)
Gas holder volume
- 4.00 8.00 12.00 16.00 20.00 24.00
Nu
mb
er
Time (h)
No. Gas Engines Running
Gas booster Gas enginesPower
GenerationBiogas
Flare
Gas storage Gas booster
Typical current MBT arrangement
- 4.00 8.00 12.00 16.00 20.00 24.00
Nm
3/m
in
Time (h)
Flare Operation
- 4.00 8.00 12.00 16.00 20.00 24.00
Inc
om
e (
£/m
in)
Time (h)
Net Revenue Profile
Estimated increase in Revenue – 5% to 8% (no physical changes)
- 4.00 8.00 12.00 16.00 20.00 24.00
Nm
3/m
in
Time (h)
Flare Operation
- 4.00 8.00 12.00 16.00 20.00 24.00
Nu
mb
er
Time (h)
No. Gas Engines Running
- 4.00 8.00 12.00 16.00 20.00 24.00
Inc
om
e (
£/m
in)
Time (h)
Net Revenue Profile
- 4.00 8.00 12.00 16.00 20.00 24.00
Nm
3
Time (h)
Gas holder volume
Optimised MBT arrangement
Gas booster Gas enginesPower
GenerationBiogas
Flare
Gas storage Gas booster
-
Waste and Energy
-
Significant improvement in revenue potentialProcess Optimisation | Equipment Optimisation
Demand Displacement and peak lopping
Grid stability management | Generation timing
-
Flexible and responsive local
infrastructure to meet local
demands….
-
Waste sector ideally placed to provide
the right size solution the local power
demands of the future