Winning Friends and Infliencing Expectations: The … and...• The perfect storm, with a tipping...
Transcript of Winning Friends and Infliencing Expectations: The … and...• The perfect storm, with a tipping...
Building Credibility and Influencing Expectations: The Evolution of Central
Bank CommunicationMonique Reid, StellenboschPierre Siklos, WLU & BSIA
1
What is a Central Banker to Do? 2019 Edition
• Qualities desirable in central bank communication?Consider goals:
• "[O]penness is an obligation of a central bank in a free and democratic society.” (Greenspan 2002)
• “For not only do expectations about policy matter, but, at least under current conditions, very little else matters.” (Woodford 2003, pg. 3; italics in original)
• The ‘quiet revolution’ (Blinder, 2008) is a ‘one way street’ (Blinder, 2017 and Siklos, 2018), despite …
• Lack acceptable theoretical framework • Existing theory has not performed well against the data
2
‘the concept of inflation expectations is quite undertheorised’ Tarullo (2017: 13)
Canada ECB South Africa
Expectations but Communication NOT explicitly mentioned. WHY? Whose expectations never clearly spelled out
THE MONETARY TRANSMISSION MECHANISM: THREE EXAMPLES
3
What is a Central Banker to Do? 2019 Edition
… there are rumblings of a desire for change
• The GFC precipitated a turning point in CB i. added burdens on CB; ii. The continued unease with QE; iii. Slowing growth, persistently low inflation; iv. Responding to ‘political, threats’
• EMEs• Institutional resilience tends to be more fragile (Bordo and Siklos, 2019)• South Africa
• Discussions about the independence of the SARB • Optimal level of the inflation target• Quantitative easing: ‘… to address intergovernmental debts to make funds
available for developmental purposes.’ (Magashule, June 2019)4
The Strategy of CB Communication
• Flourishing empirical literature is offering insights• Improve theory through the insights of how expectations are formed
• What the paper seeks to do?• Explore the evolution of CBC globally• Provide some evidence (direct & indirect) on the scope and impact of
CBC globally with an EME and South African flavour…drawing on our current research (Reid, Siklos, Du Plessis, and others)
• CBC today: where do we go from here?
5
The Strategy of CB Communication
• Emphasis should always be:• Credibility, Clarity, and Consistency: the 3 “Cs”
• This also means:• There is no ‘end of history’ in monetary policy best practices. Openness
means experimentation on how to best communicate with stakeholders• Consider heterogeneity of audience
• Complexity of language and forms of communication • Consider the mystery or opaqueness of data dependence• An openness to regular outside reviews and a large dose of humility• Within a longer term horizon communication can only ever be a complement
to policy action (a credible commitment), rather than a substitute6
The Sparks that Kindled Interest in CBC: Why and How It became Critical for the Conduct of Monetary Policy
7
Why and How It became Critical for the Conduct of Monetary Policy
WHEN? • The perfect storm, with a tipping point in the 1990s: stagflation, search for a new anchor,
passive fiscal policy led to primacy of MP in economic stabilization. Pressure to provide autonomy but democratic accountability also required greater transparency.
WHY?• Improve and maintain credibility and trust as by-products • A forward-looking MP requires inflation expectations management
HOW?• By increasing transparency …if not always, clarity• “Only with explicit performance targets will accountability arrangements be truly
effective…helpful in providing a more stable and predictable environment” (Thiessen 2001, pp. 24, 39)
Many EMEs adopted similar strategies (Bordo and Siklos, 2019) 8
CBC: ImpactHigh Frequency Impact• CBC may ‘create news’, and • If successful, reduce ‘noise’ (volatility?)
• Examples: short-run exchange rate movements, interest rate movements but not inflation expectations
Low Frequency Impact• CBC helps manage/anchor inflation expectations
• “For not only do expectations about policy matter, but, at least under current conditions, very little else matters.” (Woodford 2003, pg. 3; italics in original)
• Whose expectations?• Takes as given credibility and the existence of a clear mandate• Determined by the MP strategy (i.e., IT versus alternatives)
• NOTE: POTENTIAL TENSION WITH A CB’S MANDATE (“inflation nutter” syndrome)9
The Tactics of Central Bank Communications
• It is only recently (relative to CB’s “long” history) that CB have begun to treat “communication” as an additional channel
• Often communication strategies are not clear
• Complement? Substitute?
“monetary policy is 98% talk and 2% action.” (Bernanke, 2015)
• Just as there are constraints on the use of MP tools (conventional or unconventional) there are similar constraints on CBC
• Scope; Timing; Audiences (receptiveness and comprehension); Monetary policy strategy … and others
• Available discretion in communications may differ between EME and AE• In both cases, there could be too little or too much activism 10
Tacticsof CBC: Traditional; 4 Case Studies
BANK OF CANADA BOARD OF GOVERNORS BANCO CENTRAL DE CHILE SOUTH AFRICAN RESERVE BANK
SURVEYS (2) Surveys (18) SURVEYS (4) SURVEYS (12)
PRESS RELEASE PRESS RELEASE PRESS RELEASE PRESS RELEASE
BRIEFING BRIEFING BRIEFING BRIEFING
MINUTES (15) MINUTES (15) (16)
SPEECHESTESTIMONY
SPEECHESTESTIMONY
SPEECHES(17)
SPEECHESTESTIMONY
CONSULTATIONS(5) CONSULTATIONS(5) (13)
ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL REPORT
FINANCIAL STABILITY REPORT FINANCIAL STABILITY REPORT FINANCIAL STABILITY REPORT FINANCIAL STABILITY REPORT
MPR(7) MPR(7) MPR(7) MPR(7)
CONFERENCESCALENDARWORKING PAPERSAWARDS
CONFERENCESCALENDARWORKING PAPERSAWARDS
CONFERENCESCALENDARWORKING PAPERSAWARDS
CONFERENCESCALENDARWORKING PAPERSAWARD
ECONOMIC REVIEW(8) ECONOMIC REVIEW(8) ECONOMIC REVIEW(8)
COMMUNICATIONS POLICY COMMUNICATIONS POLICY
(9) MODELPOLICY RULE (14)
STRATEGIC PLAN(10)
(10) STRATEGIC PLAN STRATEGIC PLAN I11)
GOVERNANCE DOCUMENTS GOVERNANCE DOCUMENTS GOVERNANCE DOCUMENTS GOVERNANCE DOCUMENTS12
Forms of CBC: New and Emerging
• Some of these are already widely in practice; others less so• Target group analysis• Open fora to debate the issues: politicians and the public
• ‘pro-active’ as opposed to the more ‘passive’ form (i.e., speeches & presentations)
• Increased presence in social media• But in what form(s)? Video, infographics, newsletters, podcasts
• Broadening the number of CB officials that ‘speak’ for the CB• Publication of performance vis-à-vis policy rules• Will These Support Original Aims of CBC?
• In general, unclear but risks are high13
Challenges in CBCA. A (Partial) List of CBC ChallengesB. Identifying the challenges: Outline of a FrameworkC. Who Listens to What?D. The Qualitative Dimension of CBC: The Promise and Perils of Content AnalysisE. Inflation Expectations and CBC: International and South African EvidenceF. Communicating With a Diverse Audience: the example of Non-Financial ExpertsG. CBC and the Stance of Monetary Policy
14
CBC Challenges: What Have We Learned?There are quite a number of challenges, including:
• ‘Excessive’ reliance on unobserved variables distorts effectiveness of CBC and can be misleading (e.g., r* is an AE problem not a global one)
• Treating MP ‘surprises’ in normal and crisis times contradicts what CB say and evidence (differences in volatility; overreaction of financial markets)
• Reliance on models ignores the need to develop a communications strategy to explain the results to the public, and downplays the role of judgment in delivering MP (e.g., what we can learn from weather forecasting; Haldane 2014). Tunnel vision and myopia risks (Siklos 1998) remain
• There is too little emphasis on the role of monetary-fiscal cooperation/coordination (an old lesson that needs reminding; Laidler et. al. 1997). The central bank may be left feeling overburdened as mandates become less clear
We will focus in this presentation on a limited number of them15
Contrasting Algorithms: What to Make of Them?
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
change in FFR WS
Cha
nge
in fe
d fu
nds
rate
and
WS
equa
tion
(2)
-8%
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
-1.6
-1.2
-0.8
-0.4
0.0
0.4
0.8
1.2
1.6
2.0
2.4
55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 00 05 10
change in FFR DICTION indicator
chan
ge in
fed
fund
s ra
te (%
)
DIC
TION
indicator from factor m
odel
The DICTION indicator is based on a (factor) model that includes activity, certainty, optimism, and commonality.
Bars indicate bias towards Hawkish (+)/Dovish (-)
Benchmark No Benchmark
Dot.com
Oil price shocks
Volcker
Minutes of FOMC Meetings; Siklos (2019)
The Influence of a benchmarkUS
17
Topical Analysis
Declines since the GFC
Source: Siklos, St. Amand andWajda (2018), Figure 3.
An estimate of the likelihood that a speech is compatible with the CB’s mandate
18
So Many Algorithms….1. Wordscores
2. DICTION
3. Atlas
4. Tone analyzer
5. General Inquirer
6. LIWC (Linguistic Inquiry & Word Count)
7. Textpack
8. SPSS textsmart
9. Hemlet
10. Concordance
11. CATPAC
12. Leximancer
13. MIXED
14. Tm (text mining)
15. 1000 minds
16. VBA
17. And more….
Challenges? -Individual words versus expressions-not to mention changing language
19
The SARB’s CBC and Its Mandate
20
Real GDP growth Inflation
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
1/19
/01
11/1
5/01
11/2
8/02
12/1
1/03
12/9
/04
12/8
/05
12/7
/06
12/6
/07
12/1
1/08
8/13
/09
5/13
/10
5/12
/11
5/24
/12
5/23
/13
5/22
/14
5/21
/15
5/19
/16
5/25
/17
5/24
/18
5/23
/19
NEGATIVE_SARB_WORDS za_rgdpg
Wor
d Co
unt
Real GDP G
rowth (%
)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
1/19
/01
11/1
5/01
11/2
8/02
12/1
1/03
12/9
/04
12/8
/05
12/7
/06
12/6
/07
12/1
1/08
8/13
/09
5/13
/10
5/12
/11
5/24
/12
5/23
/13
5/22
/14
5/21
/15
5/19
/16
5/25
/17
5/24
/18
5/23
/19
FORWARD_LOOKING_SARB_WORDSza_inf
Annualized %
SARB’s MPC Communication: Drawing Some General Lessons
• Unlike other CB no trends in # words used in MPC Statements• Forward-looking inflation language playing a more prominent
role in MPC communication in recent years: a role in anchoring?• MPC communication on exchange rate steady but not prominent:
a contrast with communication by media• Like many other CB the SARB displays a concern for asset prices
but this takes a back seat to inflation and real economic concerns• There are some asymmetries in SARB communication: Rand
depreciations vs. appreciations; positive vs. negative outlook
21
Some Simple Specifications
• How the past and “MR” inflation expectations influence “SR” inflation expectations
• How “MR” inflation expectations are linked to the past or the CB’s goal
𝜋𝜋𝑡𝑡+1𝑒𝑒 = 𝜆𝜆𝜋𝜋𝑡𝑡−1 + (1 − 𝜆𝜆)𝜋𝜋𝑡𝑡+5𝑒𝑒 (1)
23
Results for South AfricaEquation (1) Equation (2)
SR = Consensus, MR = CPI5: 0.10 MR = CPI 5: 0.49
SR = Consensus, MR= Band Pass: 0.16 MR = Band Pass: 0.69
SR = CPI1, MR = CPI5: 0.04 MR = mean of 3 5 year forecasts (since 2011Q3): 0.56
SR = CPI1, MR = Band pass: 0.17
SR = Mean of 6 forecasts, MR = mean of 3 techniques; 0.28
24
Main Conclusions
• Medium-term expectations are more adaptive than short-term expectations in 20/29 economies
• Exceptions are EZ and JP (AE); otherwise 7/9 cases are EME
• Medium-term inflation expectations ‘break’ more often than short-term expectations
• Degree of expectations adaptiveness varies widely across the world: it is generally lower in AE than on EME
• With the exception of NZ the GFC raises adaptiveness only in EME (6)• The GFC affected SR adaptiveness less than MT adaptiveness and ‘breaks’
only take place in EME
25
Varieties of Inflation Expectations in South Africa: 3 Views
26
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
HHOLD_ALL_FH HHOLD_MALE_FH HHOLD_FEMALE_FHHHOLD_14K_FH HHOLD_1K3K_FH HHOLD_50_FH
HHOLD_1624_FH
2
4
6
8
10
12
00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10
HHOLD_ALL HHOLD_FEMALE HHOLD_MALEHHOLD_14K HHOLD_1K3K HHOLD_50
HHOLD_1624
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
HHOLD_ALL_FH HHOLD_MALE_FH HHOLD_FEMALE_FHHHOLD_14K_FH HHOLD_1K3K_FH HHOLD_50_FH
HHOLD_1624_FH
Fixed Horizon forecasts throughout Pre-2011: Fixed Event Post-2010: Fixed Horizon
SARB’s ITrange SARB’s IT
Upper range
Disagreement About Future Inflation in South Africa: Selected Socio-EconomicGroups
27
.00
.04
.08
.12
.16
.20
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
DIS1_MALE_FH
.00
.05
.10
.15
.20
.25
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
DIS1_FEMALE_FH
0
1
2
3
4
520
0020
0120
0220
0320
0420
0520
0620
0720
0820
0920
1020
1120
1220
1320
1420
1520
1620
1720
1820
19
DIS2_14K_FH
0
1
2
3
4
5
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
DIS2_1K3K_FH
0
1
2
3
4
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
DIS2_50_FH
0
1
2
3
4
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
DIS2_1624_FH
Disagreement a la Siklos (2013)=1/(#forecasts-1) XSquared deviation from Aggregate CPI forecast(fixed horizon)
Level of Aggregation matters
Main Sources of NEWS
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
ONLINE TVPRINT SOCIAL MEDIA
0
20
40
60
80
100
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
ONLINE TVPRINT SOCIAL MEDIA
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
ONLINE TVPRINT SOCIAL MEDIA
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
ONLINE TVPRINT SOCIAL MEDIA
0
20
40
60
80
100
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
ONLINE TVPRINT SOCIAL MEDIA
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
ONLINE TVPRINT SOCIAL MEDIA
ADVANCED ECONOMIES EMERGING MARKET ECONOMIES EUROPEAN UNION
AUSTRALASIA LATIN AND SOUTH AMERICA EURO AREA
Source: previous slide28
Sources of News? The South African Experience
.0
.1
.2
.3
.4
.5
TV
Newspa
per
Intern
etRad
io
Own exp
erien
ce
Family
and f
riend
s
SOURCE of INFORMATION
Perc
ent o
f ALL
Res
pond
ents
SOURCE: Survey data collected by the authors (via AC Nielsen)29
Information Sources: The Conclusions So Far
• What/Who the public listens to varies considerably around the world BUT
• Its personal: friends as a source of information is important, stable, and global
• TV and newspaper are declining in importance while the internet’s importance is rising
• Trust, in media is more comparable across economies than choice of news sources but data are mixed
• Social media is not catching up to other sources and has peaked or shows signs of declining in importance. Will it become the ‘media meteor’?
• What we don’t know is: how much inattentiveness is there?• For EMEs: The missing audiences? Governments and the Press
30
F. How to Communicate With Non-Financial Experts: An Absence of Shared Objectives
• Inflation expectations continue not to be well-understood and conflict with ‘standard’ theoretical rationales
• Whose expectations matter?
• Literature (and some policy makers) appear to be moving strongly in the direction of focusing on household and firm surveys of inflation expectations. Good news?
• YES• helps identify successes & failures of CBC
• NO• There is a strong element of noise (and other biases) we have yet to understand
• “When dealing with people, let us remember we are not dealing with creatures of logic. We are dealing with creatures of emotion, creatures bristling with prejudices…” (Carnegie 1936)
• Surveys of interest (i.e., households and firms) are, in the main episodic and recent31
F. How to Communicate With Non-Financial Experts: An Absence of Shared Objectives
• The media does not attempt (nor should it be required) to further the central bank’s interests
• CB need to speak in the language of their audience(s), that is, speak in tones that are aligned with the public’s concerns
• CBC needs to better understand media bias (Gentzkow and Shapiro 2010) and the characteristics and incentives of media reporting on inflation (Reid, Bergman, Du Plessis, Bergman, and Siklos, forthcoming)
‘Although carefully crafting inflation messages are indeed important, this approach fails to recognize that the media serves multiple, incompatible interests, which ultimately may make the media an unreliable partner.’ (Reid, Bergman, Du Plessis, Bergman, and Siklos, forthcoming)
EMEs and AEs face the same challenges but some are more acute for EMEs
32
Conclusions: The 3 Cs Remain
• Some principles for effective communication (the short list)• The ‘balance’ between bluntness and reassurance differs greatly between normal
and crisis times (but is Odyssean vs. Delphic distinction adequate?)• Limit forward guidance: more noise than news in non-crisis times• ‘Embrace’ the diversity of expectations: this may help limit ‘rational inattention’ • Leave the “stars” at home. Emphasize and Communicate the observable• Uncertainty and risks are a fact of life. Whenever possible avoid using them as
crutches.• Are EME’s different? YES: political pressures and track record present
constraints not managed as easily in AE; NO: pervasiveness of information and comparable reactions to domestic & external shocks between AE & EME (Bordo and Siklos 2019)
• EMEs need relatively more outreach. SARB has shown the way but more is needed
33