Wind Energy Nguyen Hoang Viet Final
-
Upload
viet-nguyenhoang -
Category
Business
-
view
107 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Wind Energy Nguyen Hoang Viet Final
1
Wind EnergyWind EnergyNguyen Hoang VietNguyen Hoang Viet
Lab. Nano-Particulate Material ProcessingUniversity of Ulsan
2
Ancient Resource Meets 21st Century
3
Wind Turbines
Power for a House or City
4
Wind Energy Outline History and Context Advantages Design Siting Disadvantages Economics Future
5
History and Context
6
Wind Energy History 1 A.D.
Hero of Alexandria uses a wind machine to power an organ ~ 400 A.D.
Wind driven Buddhist prayer wheels 1200 to 1850
Golden era of windmills in western Europe – 50,000 9,000 in Holland; 10,000 in England; 18,000 in Germany
1850’s Multiblade turbines for water pumping made and marketed in U.S.
1882 Thomas Edison commissions first commercial electric generating stations
in NYC and London 1900
Competition from alternative energy sources reduces windmill population to fewer than 10,000
1850 – 1930 Heyday of the small multiblade turbines in the US midwast
As many as 6,000,000 units installed 1936+
US Rural Electrification Administration extends the grid to most formerly isolated rural sites
Grid electricity rapidly displaces multiblade turbine uses
7
Worldwide Growth in Wind Energy
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Rest of the World
India
Denmark
USA
Spain
Germany
MWMW
8
9
This is strange because…
Wind Energy is the Fastest Growing Energy Source in the World!!
Fastest Growing EnergySource in the World
Global Growth by Energy Source, Annual Average,1990-98
25.7
16.8
3 2.1 1.6 1.4 1.2 0.60
5
10
15
20
25
30
Source: REPP,Worldwatch 1998/99
Nuclear
WindSolar PV
GeothermalNat. GasHydroOilCoal
10
11Source: American Wind Energy Association
Manufacturing Market Share
12
US Wind Energy Capacity
13
Installed Wind Turbines
14
Colorado Wind Energy Projects
Wind Energy Development Project or Area Owner Date
Online MW Power
Purchaser/User Turbines / Units
1. Ponnequin (EIU) (Phase I)
K/S Ponnequin WindSource & Energy Resources
Jan 1999 5.1 Xcel NEG Micon (7)
1. Ponnequin (Xcel) Project Info
Xcel Feb-June 1999
16.5 Xcel NEG Micon (22)
1. Ponnequin (Phase III)
New Century (Xcel)
2001 9.9 New Century (Xcel)
Vestas (15)
Peetz Table Wind Farm New Century (Xcel) 29.7 New Century
(Xcel) NEG Micon (33)
Colorado Green, Lamar (Prowers County)
Xcel Energy / GE Wind Wind Corp.
Dec 2003 162.0 Xcel GE Wind 1500 (108)
Prowers County (Lamar) Arkansas River Power Authority
2004 1.5 Arkansas River Power Authority
GE Wind 1500 (1)
Prowers County (Lamar) Lamar Utilities Board 2004 4.5 Lamar Utilities Board GE Wind 1500 (3)
15
New Projects in Colorado
New Wind Projects in Colorado
Project Utility/Developer Location Status MW Capacity
On Line By/ Turbines
Spring Canyon Xcel Energy / Invenergy Near Peetz Construction to begin in June
60 2005 / GE Wind 1500kW (87)
Wray School District Wray School District RD-2
Wray 1.5 2005 / 1500kW (1)
NA Xcel Energy / Prairie Wind Energy
Near Lamar PPA Signed 69 2005 / 1500kW (46)
16
Ponnequin – 30 MW
•Operate with wind speeds between 7-55 mph•Originally part of voluntary wind signup program•Total of 44 turbines•In 2001, 15 turbines added ~1 MW serves ~300 customers ~1 million dollars each•750 KW of electricity each turbine•Construction began Dec ‘98•Date online – total June 1999•Hub height – 181 ft•Blade diameter – 159 ft•Land used for buffalo grazing
17
Wind Power Advantages
18
Advantages of Wind Power Wind power is a renewable resource, which means using it will not
deplete the earth's supply of fossil fuels. It also is a clean energy source, and produces no carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, particulates, or any other type of air pollution, as do conventional fossil fuel power sources.
Because it removes energy directly from the atmosphere, wind power is direct mitigation of global warming.
Economic Development Fuel Diversity & Conservation Cost Stability The energy consumption for production, installation, operation and
decommission of a wind turbine is usually earned back within 3 months of operation.
Different from fossil or nuclear power stations with a huge demand for cooling water, wind turbines do not need water to generate electricity
19
Pollution from Electric Power
Source: Northwest Foundation, 12/97
23%
28%
33%
34%
70%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Toxic Heavy Metals
Particulate Matter
Nitrous Oxides
Carbon Dioxide
Sulfur Dioxide
Percentage of U.S. Emissions
Electric power is a primary source of industrial air pollution
20
Economic Development Benefits
Expanding Wind Power development brings jobs to rural communities
Increased tax revenue
Purchase of goods & services
21
Economic Development Example
Case Study: Lake Benton, MN
$2,000 per 750-kW turbine in revenue to farmers
Up to 150 construction, 28 ongoing O&M jobs
Added $700,000 to local tax base
22
Fuel Diversity Benefits Domestic energy source Inexhaustible supply Small, dispersed design
reduces supply risk
23
Cost Stability Benefits Flat-rate pricing
hedge against fuel price volatility risk Wind electricity is inflation-proof
24
Wind Power Design
25
Darrieus Vertical AxisDarrieus Vertical AxisFan Mill Horizontal AxisFan Mill Horizontal Axis
Types of wind machines
26
The power in the wind is:The power in the wind is: Power = ½ Power = ½ A VA V33
Using the density of air at sea level:Using the density of air at sea level:Power = 0.6125 AVPower = 0.6125 AV33 (metric) (metric)Power = 0.00508 AVPower = 0.00508 AV33 (mph, ft) (mph, ft)
Power in the Wind (W/m2)
Density = P/(RxT) P - pressure (Pa) R - specific gas constant (287 J/kgK) T - air temperature (K)
= 1/2 x air density x swept rotor area x (wind = 1/2 x air density x swept rotor area x (wind speed)speed)33
A V3
Area = r2
Instantaneous Speed
(not mean speed)kg/m3 m2 m/s
27
Wind Energy Natural Characteristics Wind Speed
Wind energy increases with the cube of the wind speed 10% increase in wind speed translates into 30% more
electricity 2X the wind speed translates into 8X the electricity
28V2 = (H2/H1)V1
Wind Energy Natural Characteristics Height
Wind energy increases with height to the 1/7 power 2X the height translates into 10.4% more electricity
29
Wind Energy Natural Characteristics Air density
Wind energy increases proportionally with air density Humid climates have greater air density than dry climates Lower elevations have greater air density than higher
elevations Wind energy in Denver about 6% less than at sea level
Blade swept area Wind energy increases proportionally with swept area of the
blades Blades are shaped like airplane wings
10% increase in swept diameter translates into 21% greater swept area
Longest blades up to 413 feet in diameter Resulting in 600 foot total height
30
Betz Limit Theoretical maximum energy extraction
from wind = 16/27 = 59.3% Undisturbed wind velocity reduced by 1/3 Albert Betz (1928)
31
Rotor Designs
Two blades are cheaper but do not last as long
Three blades are more stable and last longer
• Options include:• Upwind vs downwind• Passive vs active yaw
• Common option chosen is to direct the rotor upwind of the tower with a tail vane
32
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
KW
MPH
5040302010
Wind Turbine Power Curve
Vestas V80 2 MW Wind TurbineVestas V80 2 MW Wind Turbine
33
2003 1.8 MW 350’2000
850 kW 265’
2006 5 MW 600’
Recent Capacity Enhancements
34
Rotor Diameter Vs. Output Power Capacity
35
1. Hub controller 11. Blade bearing2. Pitch cylinder 12. Blade3. Main shaft 13. Rotor lock system4. Oil cooler 14. Hydraulic unit5. Gearbox 15. Machine foundation6. Top Controller 16. Yaw gears7. Parking Break 17. Generator8. Service crane 18. Ultra-sonic sensors9. Transformer 19. Meteorological gauges10.Blade Hub
10
1617
12
5
12
Nacelle ComponentsNacelle Components
36
Turbines Constantly Improving Larger turbines Specialized blade design Power electronics Computer modeling
produces more efficient design Manufacturing improvements
37
Improving Reliability Drastic improvements since mid-80’s Manufacturers report availability data of
over 95%
1981 '83 '85 '90 '98
% A
vail
able
Year0
20
40
60
80
100
38
39
40
41
42
Photos by George Gull, Cornell University
43
Largest ExistingOffshore Turbine is REpower 5M
Beatrice Projectin North Sea will
demonstrate two REpower 5-MW
turbines in offshore
application for the first time. Other firsts for Europe
include:
Deepest water(45 m depth)
Farthest offshore(25 km)
Tower platform and anchoring
concept
750-tonnetruss-work platform
Rotor diameter = 126 m
Suction-caisson anchor
410-tonneturbine and 210-tonne tower
Each rotor bladeweighs 18 tonnes
Sep 2004 installation of turbine rotor in onshore prototype at Brunnsbutel, Germany, in Schleswig-Holstein
44
Horns Rev 2-MW TurbinesInstalled Using Self-Propelled A2 SEA Vessels
45
North Hoyle 2-MW TurbinesInstalled Using Towed Seacore Jack-Up Rigs
46
How Big is a 3.6 MW Wind Turbine?This picture shows a Large Rotor Blades (Shipped by Water Offshore Wind Projects Minimize Transfers) 3.6-MW wind turbine superimposed on a Boeing 74-400
GE 3.6 MW rotor (104 m diameter)
47
VCERC submitting a CRADA Proposalto Develop Large-Blade Testing Facility
Opportunities to develop remote
structural monitoring methods for non-
destructive testing of long,composite
aerospace structures
Wind turbine blades require static (bending,
twist) and dynamic (fatigue) load testing to
ensure durability for book life of project. No North
American test facilities now exist that are
capable of testing 70 m long blades.
48
Hybridizing Marine Renewables with Offshore Gas for Baseload Power
ADVANTAGES:
•Provides high-value baseload power
•Avoids utility needfor land-based “spinning reserve”to accommodatewind variability
•Submarine power cable to shore more secure, with less environmental impact than gas pipeline
•Avoids onshoresiting challenge of finding cooling water for land-based gas power plants
•Prolongs offshore gas reservoir life for more secure future
Eclipse Energy’s hybrid project in
Irish Sea to come on line in 2007
49
Wind Project Siting
50
Wind Speed and Power Density Classes
51
52
53
Siting a Wind Farm Winds
Minimum class 4 desired for utility-scale wind farm (>7 m/s at hub height)
Transmission Distance, voltage excess capacity
Permit approval Land-use compatibility Public acceptance Visual, noise, and bird impacts are biggest concern
Land area Economies of scale in construction Number of landowners
54
Wind Disadvantages
55
Market Barriers Siting
Avian Noise Aesthetics
Intermittent source of power Transmission constraints Operational characteristics different from
conventional fuel sources Financing
56
Wind Energy and the Grid Pros
Small project size Short/flexible development time Dispatchability
Cons Generally remote location Grid connectivity -- lack of transmission capability Intermittent output
Only When the wind blows (night? Day?) Low capacity factor Predicting the wind -- we’re getting better
57
Birds - A Serious Obstacle
Birds of Prey (hawks, owls, golden eagles) in jeopardy Altamont Pass – News Update – from Sept 22
shut down all the turbines for at least two months each winter eliminate the 100 most lethal turbines Replace all before permits expire in 13 years
58
Wind – Characteristics & Consequences
Remote location and low capacity factor Higher transmission investment per unit output
Small project size and quick development time Planning mismatch with transmission investment
Intermittent output Higher system operating costs if systems and
protocols not designed properly
59
Balancing Supply & Demand
Base Load – Coal
Gas/Hydro
Gas
3500
4000
4500
3000
60
Energy Delivery
Lake Benton & Storm Lake PowerFebruary 24, 2002
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
180000
200000
0:00
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
5:00
6:00
7:00
8:00
9:00
10:0
0
11:0
0
12:0
0
13:0
0
14:0
0
15:0
0
16:0
0
17:0
0
18:0
0
19:0
0
20:0
0
21:0
0
22:0
0
23:0
0
(HH:MM)
(kW
)
Lake Benton II Storm Lake
Combined
61
Energy Delivery
Lake Benton & Storm Lake PowerJuly 7, 2003
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
180000
0:00
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
5:00
6:00
7:00
8:00
9:00
10:0
0
11:0
0
12:0
0
13:0
0
14:0
0
15:0
0
16:0
0
17:0
0
18:0
0
19:0
0
20:0
0
21:0
0
22:0
0
23:0
0
(HH:MM)
(kW
)
Lake Benton II Storm Lake
Combined
62
Wind Economics
63
Wind Farm Design Economics Key Design Parameters
Mean wind speed at hub height Capacity factor
Start with 100% Subtract time when wind speed less than optimum Subtract time due to scheduled maintenance Subtract time due to unscheduled maintenance Subtract production losses
Dirty blades, shut down due to high winds Typically 33% at a Class 4 wind site
64
Wind Farm Financing
Financing Terms Interest rate
LIBOR + 150 basis points Loan term
Up to 15 years
65
Cost of Energy Components Cost (¢/kWh) =
(Capital Recovery Cost + O&M) / kWh/year Capital Recovery = Debt and Equity Cost O&M Cost = Turbine design, operating
environment kWh/year = Wind Resource
66
1979: 40 cents/kWh
• Increased Turbine Size
• R&D Advances
• Manufacturing Improvements
NSP 107 MW Lake Benton wind farm
4 cents/kWh (unsubsidized)
2004: 3 – 4.5 cents/kWh
2000:4 - 6 cents/kWh
Cost of Energy Trend
67
Construction Cost Elements
Turbines, FOB USA49%
Construction22%
Towers (tubular steel)
10%
Interest During Construction
4%
Interconnect/Subsation
4%
Land Transportation
2%Development
Activity4%
Design & Engineering
2%
Financing & Legal Fees3%
68
Future Trends
69
Expectations for Future Growth
20,000 total turbines installed by 2010 6% of electricity supply by 2020
100,000 MW of wind power installed by 2020
70
Future Cost Reductions Financing Strategies Manufacturing
Economy of Scale Better Sites and
“Tuning” Turbines for Site Conditions
Technology Improvements
71
Future Tech Developments Application Specific Turbines
Offshore Limited land/resource areas Transportation or construction limitations Low wind resource Cold climates
72
The Future of Wind - Offshore•1.5 - 6 MW per turbine•60-120 m hub height•5 km from shore, 30 m deep ideal•Gravity foundation, pole, or tripod formation•Shaft can act as artificial reef•Drawbacks- T&D losses (underground cables lead to shore) and visual eye sore
73
Wind Energy Storage Pumped hydroelectric
Georgetown facility – Completed 1967 Two reservoirs separated by 1000 vertical feet Pump water uphill at night or when wind energy production exceeds
demand Flow water downhill through hydroelectric turbines during the day or
when wind energy production is less than demand About 70 - 80% round trip efficiency Raises cost of wind energy by 25% Difficult to find, obtain government approval and build new facilities
Compressed Air Energy Storage Using wind power to compress air in underground storage caverns
Salt domes, empty natural gas reservoirs Costly, inefficient
Hydrogen storage Use wind power to electrolyze water into hydrogen Store hydrogen for use later in fuel cells 50% losses in energy from wind to hydrogen and hydrogen to electricity 25% round trip efficiency Raises cost of wind energy by 4X
74
U.S. Wind Energy Challenges Best wind sites distant from
population centers major grid connections
Wind variability Can mitigate if forecasting improves
Non-firm power Debate on how much backup generation is required
NIMBY component Cape Wind project met with strong resistance by Cape
Cod residents Limited offshore sites
Sea floor drops off rapidly on east and west coasts North Sea essentially a large lake
Intermittent federal tax incentives
75
Many Thanks
for your attention!