WHY WEA PAC?

20
WHY WEA PAC?

description

WHY WEA PAC?. Washington Legislature 2011. Washington voters Rejected an income tax initiative that would have raised billions for public education. • Overturned new taxes on soda, candy and bottled water. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of WHY WEA PAC?

Page 1: WHY  WEA PAC?

WHY WEA PAC?

Page 2: WHY  WEA PAC?

Washington Legislature 2011

Page 3: WHY  WEA PAC?

Washington voters•Rejected an income tax initiative that would have

raised billions for public education.

• Overturned new taxes on soda, candy and bottled water. • Passed Tim Eyman’s I-1053, which requires a two-thirds vote of the Legislature to pass new taxes or close existing tax loopholes.

• Defeated four incumbent pro-education state senators.

• Re-elected several anti-union Democrats to the state Senate.

Page 4: WHY  WEA PAC?

Groups opposed to Collective Bargaining

Stand for Children or STAND

League of Education Voters

Partnership for Learning

Page 5: WHY  WEA PAC?

Legislation HB 1609, Representative Pettigrew

(37th L.D.) SB 5399, sponsored by Senator

Rodney Tom (48th L.D.). Tied teacher lay-offs to unsatisfactory

evaluations. SB 6696 Merit pay, sponsored and

supported by Washington PTA

Page 6: WHY  WEA PAC?

Pro-Education Proponents

Representative Sharon Tomiko-Santos (37th L.D.)

Speaker of the House, Frank Chopp (43rd L.D.)

House Majority Leader Pat Sullivan (47th L.D.)

Senator Rosemary McAuliffe (1st L.D.),

Page 7: WHY  WEA PAC?

Budget Reductions (non-compensation)

Suspend I-728 class size reduction funding – ($861 million).

Eliminate K-4 class size reduction – ($215 million).

$6 million from a reduction in Running Start funding

$4.8 million cut to Summer Vocational Skills Program

$1.9 million elimination of funding for math and science coaches

Page 8: WHY  WEA PAC?

K-12 Compensation

Suspend I-732 COLA – ($265 million)

Across-the-Board Salary Reduction – ($179 million)

National Board Bonus Changes – ($61.1 million)

Repeal of the Plan 1 Uniform COLA – ($275 million)

Page 9: WHY  WEA PAC?

Budget Additions

$ to Explore a State Takeover of K-12 health benefits - $1.2 million

Page 10: WHY  WEA PAC?

Wisconsin’s Governor Walker

Page 11: WHY  WEA PAC?

Changes to Collective bargaining Contracts limited to one year and wages

frozen

Collective bargaining units are required to take annual votes to maintain certification as a union.

Employers are prohibited from collecting union dues and members of collective bargaining units are not required to pay dues.

Page 12: WHY  WEA PAC?

The Ohio Public Employee Collective Bargaining Law

Page 13: WHY  WEA PAC?

School districts

Prohibits a a school district from entering into a collective bargaining agreement that does specified things, such as establishing a maximum number of students who may be assigned to a classroom or teacher.

Requires collective bargaining agreements between such an education-related public employer and public employees to comply with all applicable state or local laws or ordinances regarding wages, hours, and terms and conditions of employment, unless the conflicting provision establishes benefits that are less than provided in the law or ordinance..

Page 14: WHY  WEA PAC?

Public employee pay

Requires merit-based pay for most public employees, including teachers and nonteaching school employees

Generally eliminates statutory salary schedules and steps.

Page 15: WHY  WEA PAC?

Public employee benefits

Limits public employer contributions toward health insurance premiums to 80%.

Abolishes continuing contracts for teachers, except for those continuing contracts in existence prior to the effective date of the bill.

Prohibits a public employer from paying employee contributions to certain retirement systems.

Page 16: WHY  WEA PAC?

Reduction in the public sector work force

Removes consideration of seniority and of length of service, by itself, from decisions regarding a reduction in work force of certain public employees.

Page 17: WHY  WEA PAC?

WHAT’S AT STAKE?Cuts to K-12 Education in the 2011 Session

$2.5 billion total cut in K-12 and higher education funding over the next two years

More students this fall, and fewer education support professionals and teachers

Repeal of the age 66 COLA for Plan 1 retirees

Reduce school year by one week- from 180 to 175 days

Page 18: WHY  WEA PAC?

WHAT’S AT STAKE?Potential Cuts during the Special Session and Beyond

all-day kindergarten for poor children

Levy Equalization money that property-poor districts get to supplement their levies

National Board Certified Teacher incentive pay bonuses reduced to $4,000

Teacher pay, which already took a 1.9 percent cut

Reductions in health care funding or a state takeover of K-12 health benefit plans by 2013-14

An end to collective bargaining rights

Page 19: WHY  WEA PAC?

Possible Issues

Base funding on daily- not monthly attendance Salary/Compensation Collective Bargaining Merit Pay NBCT Vouchers and Charter Schools Retirement and Pensions Certification Testing/MSP Health Care/Benefits

Page 20: WHY  WEA PAC?

Why give your $2.25?

700 Washington educators traveled to Olympia last year to give face-to-face testimony to our elected representatives

WEAPAC supports any candidate who supports education

If we don’t speak up for education… who will??