Why is aircraft noise more annoying than other ... · ISO. (2003). Acoustics-Assessment of noise...
33
KTH Centrum för Hållbar Luftfart (CSA) Workshop om Flygbuller Måndag 3 Oktober 09.00-13.00 med efterföljande lunch & mingel Plats: KTH OpenLab, Multihallen, Valhallavägen 79 Why is aircraft noise more annoying than other transportation noises? Mats E. Nilsson Gösta Ekman Laboratory, Department of Psychology Stockholm University
Transcript of Why is aircraft noise more annoying than other ... · ISO. (2003). Acoustics-Assessment of noise...
KTH Centrum för Hållbar Luftfart (CSA)Workshop om Flygbuller
Måndag 3 Oktober 09.00-13.00 med efterföljande lunch & mingelPlats: KTH OpenLab, Multihallen, Valhallavägen 79
Why is aircraft noise more annoying than other transportation noises?
Mats E. NilssonGösta Ekman Laboratory, Department of PsychologyStockholm University
www.who.int
WHO’s Guidelines for community noise
2000
www.euro.who.int
2011
2011
Traffic Noise and Health
Traffic noise
Annoyance
Sleep disturbance
Cardio-vascular disease
Noise at
facade
Perceived
annoyance
Activity
disturbance (speech,
concentration,
rest, sleep…)
Self-reported
noise
annoyance
Individual factors(noise sensitivity,
attitudes to the source,
age, …)
Noise annoyance
Non-acoustic
exposure factors(Visual intrusion, odor,
vibration, …)
Acoustic factors (quiet side, facade
reduction, window
opening habits, …)
Noise annoyance questionnaire
ISO. (2003). Acoustics-Assessment of noise annoyance by means of social and socio-acoustic surveys. ISO/TS 15666:2003(E). Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
”Thinking about the last 12 months or so, when you are here at home,
how much does noise from …. bother, disturb or annoy you?
Not at all Slightly Moderately Very Extremely
[ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Nilsson, M. E., Selander, J., Alvarsson, J., Berglund, B., & Bluhm, G. (2013). Naturvårdsverkets rapport 6570. Stockholm: Naturvårdsverket.
MAXFLYG 2013
Schultz (1978)
Schultz, T. J. (1978). Synthesis of social surveys on noise annoyance. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 64(2), 377-405.
Kryter (1982)
Kryter, K. D. (1982). Community annoyance from aircraft and ground vehicle noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 72(4), 1222-1242.See also rebuttals to comments by Schultz
Miedema & Oudshoorn, 2001Commission of the European Communities, 2002
Miedema, & Oudshoorn, (2001). Environmental Health Perspectives, 109, 409-416.
CEC. (2002). Position paper on dose response relationships between transportation noise and annoyance. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
0
0
.1
.2
.3
.4
.5
.6
.7
An
del
bu
llers
törd
a
<45 45-49
Vägtrafikbuller, LDEN (dB)
50-54
55-59
60-64
65-69
>700
.1
.2
.3
.4
.5
.6
.7
Spårtrafikbuller, LDEN (dB)
<45 45-49
50-54
55-59
60-64
65-69
>70
[1] Miedema & Oudshoorn (2001)
Metaanalysprediktion [1]
Ströningsdata:
Miljöhälsoenkät 2007
N = 2496 (Stockholm,
Göteborg, Malmö)
Bullerdata:
END kartor
Vägtrafikbuller Spårtrafikbuller
Andel bullerstörda av trafikbuller i svenska storstäder:
Data och prediktion
Eriksson, et al. (2011)
Babsich, et al., 2009
Nosie annoyance road traffic
Pro
prt
ion h
ighly
annoyedr
[%]
Road traffic noise [dB LDEN]
Is aircraft noise getting more disturbing?
Babsich, et al., 2009
pro
prt
ion h
ighly
annoyed [
%]
Aircraft noise [dB LDEN]
Noise annoyance aircraft
Nilsson, M. E., Selander, J., Alvarsson, J., Berglund, B., & Bluhm, G. (2013). Naturvårdsverkets rapport 6570. Stockholm: Naturvårdsverket.
MAXFLYG 2013
Janssen et al. (2011). JASA, 129, 1953-1962.
Trends in aircraft noise annoyance
Kryter’s answer:
Kryter, K. D. (1982). Community annoyance from aircraft and ground vehicle noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 72(4), 1222-1242.
Why is aircraft noise more annoying?
Kluizenaar, et al. (2011)Öhrström, et al. (2006)
Noise annoyance and access to quiet facade
Self reported sleep disturbance
Source: Miedema and Oudshoorn, 2003, 2004
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75
Traffic noise (dB, Lnight)
Pro
prt
in h
igh
ly s
leep
dis
turb
ed (
%H
SD)
Air
Road
Rail
%
Jonsson & Sörensen. (1970). Relation between annoyance reactions and attitude to source of annoyance. Public Health Reports, 85, 1070-1074.
Attityder till trafik
1. 113 (20 %, n = 611)2. 222 (15 %, n = 461)3. 223 (14 %, n = 442)…………25. 321 (0.1%, n = 2)26. 312 (0 %, n =1 )27. 311 (0 %, n =1 )
41%44%
5%
52%46%27%
7%10%68%
Unpublished data from the MAXFLYG study
Noiseexsposure
Noiseannoyance
Attitudes to noisesource
Backgroundvariables
Model 1: Attitudes influences annoyance
Noiseexsposure
Noiseannoyance
Attitudes to noisesource
Backgroundvariables
Model 2: Annoyance influences attitudes
Flygbullerexponering och attityd
0 1-2 3-5 6-14 15-29 30-59 >=60
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Antal flygbullerhändelser 70 dB LA max,s low
Andel negati
v f
lygtr
afik a
llm
änt
Alla flygplatser
”Samhället bör verka för en minskning av …”
FlygtrafikVägtrafik
Spårtrafik
Unpublished data from the MAXFLYG study
Summary
o Aircraft more annoying than road and rail• The difference seem to be increasing, unclear why
o Why makes aircraft noise more annoying? • Acoustic factors (quite side)• Attitudes to the source
0 1-2 3-5 6-14 15-29 30-59 >=60
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Antal flygbullerhändelser 70 dB LA max,s low
Andel flygbullers
törd
a u
tepla
ts
Ej negativ egen flygplats
Negativ egen flygplats
0 1-2 3-5 6-14 15-29 30-59 >=60
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Antal flygbullerhändelser 70 dB LA max,s low
Andel flygbullers
törd
a u
tepla
ts
Ej negativ flygtrafik
Negativ flygtrafik
Flygbullerstörning och attityd till flygtrafik
4. Vid jämförbar flygbullerexponering är andelen flygbullerstörda markant högre bland personer med en negativ attityd till flygtrafik jämfört med personer med en merpositiv attityd. För båda grupperna ses dock ett tydligt och starkt samband mellanflygbullerexponering och bullerstörning.
Nilsson, M. E., Selander, J., Alvarsson, J., Berglund, B., & Bluhm, G. (2013). Naturvårdsverkets rapport 6570. Stockholm: Naturvårdsverket.
MAXFLYG 2013
Nilsson, M. E., Selander, J., Alvarsson, J., Berglund, B., & Bluhm, G. (2013). Naturvårdsverkets rapport 6570. Stockholm: Naturvårdsverket.
MAXFLYG 2013
Miedema & Vos (1998). JASA,104(6), 3432-3445
Aircraft
20 studies, total n = 34 214
Aircraft Noise Annoyance
Miedema & Vos (1998). JASA,104(6), 3432-3445
Road traffic
26 studies, total n = 21 228
Road traffic Noise Annoyance
Miedema & Vos (1998). JASA,104(6), 3432-3445
Railway
9 studies, total n = 8 527
Railway noise annoyance
Target: 40 dB Lnight
”… to protect the public, including the most vulnerable groups such as children, the chronically ill and the elderly”
Interim target: 55 dB Lnight
”… [if the target] cannot be achieved in the short term for various reasons, and where policy makers choose to adopt a stepwise approach”
www.euro.who.int2009
