Love God more than you love anything else. Always say God ...
Why Bush needs to talk to God more formerly Would the world be more peaceful without God? Ian...
-
Upload
philip-gaines -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Why Bush needs to talk to God more formerly Would the world be more peaceful without God? Ian...
Why Bush needs to talk to God more
formerly
Would the world be more peaceful without God?
Ian Hansen
Collaborators
• Ara Norenzayan• Jeremy Ginges• Ilan Dar-Nimrod
Is Religion pure tolerance, pure intolerance, or a wild card?
• Our investigations on this question are inspired by research findings that religious affiliation is a very strange moderator in mortality salience experiments (e.g. Norenzayan & Hansen, 2006)
• Generally, people who are reminded of their inevitable death tend to become more hateful and dismissing of the worldview of The Other (billions of studies, Greenberg, Solomon, Pycsynski & colleagues)
Shouldn’t this effect be found primarily among religious people?
• Religions are supposedly motivated in part by a need to deny death
• Religious people tend to be more right wing than secular people
• Being devoted to one religion and being intolerant towards other religions should go hand in glove
In fact…
Support for a Godly-Islam-will-overthrow-the-
faithless-West essay
…religious people often open up more (or close off less)to the Religious Other under mortality salience
Laughably extreme religion argument I
– Religion is a cause of all war and prejudice: all religions teach nothing but conquest and intolerance
The Inquisition burning some Jezebel-Delilah-Salome-Frida Unibrow
Laughably extreme religion argument II
– Religion is a solution to all war and prejudice: all religions teach nothing but love and universal brotherhood.
Buddy Christ not burning anyone at all
An intermediate position
• Gordon Allport (1950): “Religion makes prejudice and it unmakes prejudice. While the creeds of the great religions are universalistic, all stressing brotherhood, the practice of these creeds is frequently divisive and brutal. The sublimity of religious ideals is offset by the horrors of persecution in the name of these same ideals ”
• This sounds about right, but the empirical legacy on this is muddy
Allport’s Error• A “two types of people”
theory: “intrinsic” type people vs. “extrinsic” type people
• Neither type seems all that good at unmaking prejudice
• Our explanation: the tolerant face of religion may co-arise with its intolerant face, a la yin and yang…or Jekyll and Hyde
Devotional Religiosity: The Dr. Jekyll of Religion?
• Faith, devotion to the divine, prayer
=Dr. JekyllDevotional Bush
?
Coalitional religiosity: The Mr. Hyde of Religion?
• Exclusivity, authoritarianism, dogmatism, fundamentalism
=Mr. HydeCoalitional Bush
?
Typical correlations between devotional and coalitional religiosity
Participant Variable 1 2 3 4 5 6 1. Devotion to Divine (.96) .81 .41 .61 .35 .33 2. Devotion to one’s religion (.91) .61 .74 .49 .45 3. Exclusivity (.94) .82 .57 .56 4. Fundamentalism (.93) .63 .67 5. Dogmatism (.87) .57 6. Authoritarianism (.89)
Would Dr. Jekyll be relatively pleasant company if it weren’t for
Mr. Hyde?
• The baseness so commonly charged to religion’s account are thus, almost all of them, not chargeable to religion proper, but rather to religion’s wicked practical partner, the spirit of corporate dominion. And the bigotries are most of them in their turn chargeable to religion’s wicked intellectual partner, the spirit of dogmatic dominion.
• -- William James (1982/1902, p. 337), The Varieties of Religious Experience
“Wicked” = “fit for natural selection”?
Jekyll and Hyde as two complementary processes of adaptive ingroup favoritism
• Devotional religiosity: aids the imaginative expansion of the boundary of moral inclusion
• Coalitional religiosity: aids the pragmatic hardening of the boundary of moral exclusion
• Both processes complementary, but very different—and when isolated from each other may predict very different things.
22.5
33.5
44.5
55.5
66.5
not devoted
devoted
Coalitional attitude not controlled:(more devoted also more coalitional)
Why the religion and prejudice literature is an inconclusive mess
Split sample of 194 Canadian students into the most devoted half and the least devoted half, 97 “devoted” and 97 “not devoted”
No difference in intolerance or violence
11.5
22.5
33.5
44.5
reli
gio
us
anti
pat
hy
civi
lin
tole
ran
ce
agg
ress
ive
anti
pat
hy
reli
gio
us
vio
len
ce
not devoted
devoted
So is the empirical psychology of religion doomed to be null result-ridden contradictory useless garbage?
Disentangling Jekyll from Hyde
22.5
33.5
44.5
55.5
66.5
not devoteddevoted
Coalitional attitude controlled
Split the sample in half a different way. This time divide it by their scores on this formula: devotional – coalitional [mean(divine devotion+intrinsic religiosity)-mean(authoritarianism+dogmatism+fundamentalism+exclusivity)]
Split this way, the more devoted are less intolerant and less violent
11.5
22.5
33.5
44.5
reli
gio
us
anti
pat
hy
civi
lin
tole
ran
ce
agg
ress
ive
anti
pat
hy
reli
gio
us
vio
len
ce
not devoted
devoted
Into
lera
nce
What about the Middle East?
Baruch Goldstein Mahmud Muhamad Shaldan
Similar pattern among Palestinians
Odds of supporting “martyrdom operations”
Pray 5 times a day vs. never pray
1.38 : 1 equal odds
Attend mosque 5 times a day vs. only religious festivals
2.11 : 1 double odds
Similar pattern among Israeli settlers
PRAY NO PRIME SYNAGOGUE
0
5
10
15
20
%Experimental
data
Percentage of settlers who believed that Baruch Goldstein’s 1994 massacre of Palestinians was “extremely heroic” as a function of prime.
Similar pattern across the globe
0
1
2
3
4
5
6C
AT
HO
LIC
(ME
XIC
O)
PR
OT
ES
TA
NT
(U
K)
MU
SL
IM(I
ND
ON
ES
IA)
HIN
DU
(IN
DIA
)
JEW
ISH
(IS
RA
EL
)
OR
TH
OD
OX
(RU
SS
IA)
FU
LL
SA
MP
LE
Prayer
Organizedattendance
#
#
**
*
***
***
***
6: 1
1: 1
# p < .1 * p < .05 ** p < .01 *** p < .001
Odd
s of
sup
port
ing
com
bativ
e m
arty
rdom
Predicting religious scapegoating
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
Do not pray regularly
Pray regularly
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
NONE ATTEND PRAY PRAY +ATTEND
Not exclusivist
Exclusivist
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
Not regular attender
Regular attender
Effect of prayer Effect of exclusivity
Effect of organized attendance
Independent relationship of religion variables to war and oppression
-0.8
0
0.8 Exclusivity
Prayer
La
ck
of
fre
ed
om
Re
fug
ee
sp
er
ca
pit
a
arm
s v
ol
/gd
p
mili
tary
sp
en
din
g/g
dp
Prayer (devotion) and exclusivity (coalition) make opposite predictions
Independent relationship of religion variables to war and oppression
-0.8
0
0.8 Exclusivity
Prayer
Attendance
La
ck
of
fre
ed
om
Re
fug
ee
sp
er
ca
pit
a
arm
s v
ol
/gd
p
mili
tary
sp
en
din
g/g
dp
Caveat! Religious attendance (coalitional) predicts peace and freedom as well or better than prayer (devotional)!
Does religious attendance have sociologically redeeming features? Can it be considered a kind of constructive collective action?
So…devotional and coalitional religiosity are intertwined
Coalitional religiosity
Devotional religiosity
But they make opposite predictions about religious intolerance and
support for violence
Devotional religiosity
Coalitional religiosity
Predicts intolerance
Predicts tolerance
So pray that Bush listens to God more…
…and listens to Dick and Rummy less