Why & How to Leverage ESCO MacDonald-Miller Facility ...
Transcript of Why & How to Leverage ESCO MacDonald-Miller Facility ...
MacDonald-Miller Facility Solutions We make buildings work better.
Why & How to Leverage ESCO
Panel Members
Brian Hanson PE ESCO Development
Manager
MacDonald-Miller
John Van Hersett ESCO Project
Manager
MacDonald-Miller
Barry Holldorf
Director of Facilities
& Operations
Highline College
Joe Sullivan PE
Energy Engineer
Department of
Enterprise Services
Highline’s Story B4 innovative project
• Project challenges
• Leverage federal funds for Commerce grants
• More dollars for building improvement
Failing Heating Water
Distribution System
• Corroded 10” mains
• Decouple from plant
• Solutions
What is ESCO process & DES’ Role?
Prequalified
Providers Project
Oversight
Contractual
Framework &
Coordination
Financial
Transparency
1986 RCW 39.35
Legislative
Authority to GA
(Now DES)
ESCO Benefits Collaboration between Owner, DES, and ESCO
Ability to fast-track
Owner involved with contractor selection
Owner involved with equipment selection
One responsible entity (ESCO)
GUARANTEED:
Maximum project cost
Energy savings
Equipment/System performance
Current
Operational
Costs Savings
New
Operational
Costs
Before During
Savings
After
Utility &
Maintenance
Costs
Fin
an
cin
g Annual Debt
Service
Utility &
Maintenance
Costs
Utility &
Maintenance
Costs
Department of Enterprise Services Experience
Energy conservation in public facilities since 1986
Over 500 projects totaling $300 million
Over $100 million in energy cost saved
$30 million in utility rebates brought to the projects
Clients include state agencies, colleges and universities, cities and towns, counties, school districts,
port districts, libraries, hospitals, health districts:
Highline College
Olympic College
Yakima School District
Valley Medical Center
City of Tukwila
King County
Tumwater School District
Department of Corrections
University of Washington
Veterans Administration
City of Olympia
Port of Bellingham
…and dozens more
Customers:
Sequence of an ESCO Project
Project initiated by
Interagency
Agreement
ESCO
Selection
Investment
Grade Audit
Measurement
& Verification
Preliminary
Audit
#1
Design &
Construction
#3 #5
#4 #6 #2
Highline College – Building 4 Energy Efficiency Upgrades
CONCERNS
Outdated lighting, controls &
mechanical system
147 EUI = Inefficiency
No Air Conditioning
Aircraft Noise Interruption
Failing heating distribution system
T-12 Light fixtures
Hydronic Baseboards &
Hydronic Multizone
System
Pneumatic Controls
Project Overview
OPPORTUNITY
FAA Noise Abatement Grant - Port of Seattle
• In 2011, the College received a FAA Noise
Abatement Grant
• Envelope upgrades was primary focus
• Not enough funding to address the other
Identified challenges
Department of Commerce Grants
• Bundled EE projects on Campus leveraging
FAA funds to qualify for DOC grants
• Leveraged minimal funds available from College
Project Overview
NEW
• HVAC System
• LED & T-5 Lighting
• Building Controls
GUARANTEED
• System
Performance
• Project Cost
• Energy Outcomes
OTHERS
• Removed from
Central Heating
Plant
• Air Conditioning
Addition
UNIQUE CONTRACTING STRUCTURE
Project Process
HC Building 4
HC / DES Project Management
Aircraft Noise Reduction
Increased Occupant Comfort
Removed from Central Plant
State of the Art Lighting Control
Efficient HVAC & Lighting
147 EUI To 37
BENEFITS
Project Overview
Measurement & Verification – B4 MacDonald-Miller conforms to the International Performance Measurement
and Verification Protocol (IPMVP)
IPMVP Option D. Energy Model Simulation
Agreed to by DES and College as the proper M&V option to use
Document building conditions for the energy model simulation
• Envelope
• Lighting
• Mechanical system operation
• Miscellaneous equipment energy usage
• Existing and proposed hours of operation
Post Project M&V:
• Infrared pictures of Envelope
• Document wattage of installed lighting
• Trend lighting panel to confirm schedules
• Trend HVAC operation to confirm scheduling, Occupied and unoccupied setpoints.
• Compare trending and equipment efficiencies to savings calculations and compare
them to the guaranteed savings. Sa
vin
gs
Ac
hie
ve
d
PRIMARY
OBJECTIVE: Deliver
the Expected Energy
Savings at the
Building Meter Year-
Over-Year
Boilers, Oh My! • Performing Site survey for crane pick
– What's coming out of that vault?
– Uh oh….
• Engage DES approval for Engineering
investigation
• Develop cost analysis for repair options
• Expedited Contracting, Tight
construction window
What was presented: Options Studied:
• Pipe Bursting (Trenchless)
• Cured-In-Place Pipe Lining (Trenchless)
• Open Cut Excavation and Pipeline
Replacement
• Direct Boring (Trenchless)
• Satellite Boiler
• Temporary Boilers (If piping failed prior
to a permanent fix)
Each Option Included:
• Overview of the option
• Advantages
• Disadvantages
• Impact of students and staff
• Timeframe for completion
• ROM Total Project Cost
Construction B29 B4
Discovery
9/16/17 9/17/17 10/18/17 11/18/17 1/05/18
DES on Board NTP for IGA Report Delivered NTP for Construction
11/19/17
Installation
Completed
Partnership Provided:
Integrated Design and Construction
Turn Key Solutions
Stretching Dollars
Innovative Project
Risk Mitigation
Time of Delivery & Project Flexibility
Interactive Communication
Guaranteed Cost
Best solution vs. Low Bid
Partnership & Trust
Transparency
Leverage Grants
Attractive ESCO Projects
1. Projects with significant Energy/Utility
Savings • Interior and exterior Lighting (LED)
• HVAC projects – chillers, boilers, pumps, AHUs,
distribution systems, commissioning
• Water conversation projects
• Building Envelope Upgrade
Attractive ESCO Projects
2. Projects with some energy savings and significant project complexities
• Projects that require scheduling work around client requirements on critical deadlines
• Projects with numerous unknowns like retro commissioning projects or major HVAC renovations
• Projects that need contractor flexibility
• Projects that need guaranteed cost & energy savings to apply for grants
John Van Hersett [email protected]
206-768-4250
Barry Holldorf [email protected]
206-870-3793
Questions? Contact us!
Brian Hanson PE [email protected]
206-768-3902
Joe Sullivan PE [email protected]
360-407-9377