Who speaks ICF? Implementation of ICF in early childhood ... · an ICF training nor introduction...
1
Introduction Germany passed a new participation law (Bundesteilhabegesetz) that declares the use of the ICF as mandatory for rehabilitation and social institutions in Germany starting in 2018. Consequently, there is a push to develop ICF-oriented tools and instruments, and the number of instruments for different purposes is increasing. In 2016 the ICF Research Institute (IRIs) at MSH Medical School Hamburg started a project “ICF Mapping” with the primary objective of exploring the status of ICF use in all EICs in Germany as well as the learning/training needs of the EIC professionals. Who speaks ICF? Implementation of ICF in early childhood intervention centers in Germany Within the last year, the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) has become well-known in early childhood intervention centers (EICs) in Germany. Started in 2016, the “ICF Mapping Project” is a project that aims to systematically review ICF usage in the EICs. We conducted a survey in 2017 and again in July 2018. In this poster, we present the results of the follow-up survey sent to all EICs in Germany (N=1000). 22-27 October 2018 Seoul, Republic of Korea Poster Number 108 WHO - FAMILY OF INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATIONS NETWORK ANNUAL MEETING 2018 Authors: Liane Simon 1,2 , Sven Kottysch 1 , Alexander Mevs 1 , Julia Paulsen 1 1: ICF Research Institute at MSH Medical School Hamburg Germany 2: ICF Research Branch, a cooperation partner within the WHO Collaborating Centre for the Family of International Classifications in Germany (at DIMDI) Methods & Materials Acknowledgements Recap 2017 Results The results of a first survey (in 2017) was presented at the 2017 WHO-FIC Annual Meeting. A follow-up survey took place online in July 2018 using the same questionnaire as in 2017 with only one additional question addressing the use of newly developed needs assessments. We sent the link to the online survey to the heads of all EICs in Germany (n=1000). Discussion /Conclusions Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales (2017) Bundesteilhabegesetz. [Internet]. Available at: www.bmas.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/PDF- Meldungen/2016/bundesteilhabegesetz.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=7 . Accessed 7 August 2018. Simon, L . , Kottysch, S . Irmler, M., Kindervater, A.(2017):Do you speak ICF? Poster 2 nd international symposium on ICF education, Cape Town, South Africa. Kottysch, S., Simon, L., Mevs, A., Paulsen, J. (2018): Implementation of the ICF in early childhood intervention centres in Germany, Poster 3 rd International Symposion in ICF Education, Hamburg, Germany Abstract The EICs across Germany’s 16 Federal states are in various stages of ICF implementation. Figure 1 shows the allocation of the 329 returned responses to the 2017 survey (n 2017 ) to federal states, showing regional differences in usage. Figure 1: use of ICF in the 16 provinces of Germany in 2017 (multiple answers possible) Figure 2: How do you use ICF? Answers of 164 EICs in Germany (multiple answers possible) In the 2018 sample, 46 EICs indicated that they do not use the ICF in any way (-25.2 percentage points). The majority has not participated in an ICF training nor introduction class (-1.9 percentage points). Figure 3: 27 of 46 EICs not using the ICF have indicated that they have not participated in an ICF training nor introduction class. Figure 4: Use of ICF in the 16 German states in 2018 (multiple answers possible) The new German participation law explicitly requires the use of the ICF. A complete reform of the social system over the next few years is planned. Accordingly the use of the ICF in EICs is also increasing. The results of the 2017 and 2018 surveys show that in 2018 the use of ICF checklists (29.9%) and of ICF codes in intervention plans (30.5%) have increased compared to the 2017 (13.4% and 21% respectively). For the first time, ICF-based needs assessment procedures developed by the responsible authorities were also used by 23 EICs (14%). The survey results also show that: • There is a strong need for training classes. • Also needed are ICF -based instruments that are especially suitable for daily routine practice in EICs and for assessing needs in early childhood in general. • The increasing variety of ICF-based assessments and instruments requires a more detailed analysis. The 164 survey responses in 2018 can be allocated to 14 federal states. We did not receive answers from 2 states (see figure 4). Of the 1000 questionnaires sent out to the EICs in 2018 164 were returned (n 2018 ), rendering a §of 16,4% (-16.5 percentage points compared to 2017). In our sample (n 2018 =164), 118 EICs indicated that they are using the ICF in different ways (+25.5 percentage points compared to 2017): • 93 EICs use ICF as a framework/ attitude (+6.7 percentage points) • 49 EICs use the ICF-checklists (+12.9 percentage points) • 50 EICs use codes or ICF items for intervention plans (-2.4 percentage points) © GeoBasis-DE / BKG (2017), data changed Results of the 2018 Survey ICF Mapping was funded by IRIs, MSH Medical School Hamburg, www.icf-research-institute.de We thank Melissa Selb for her input.
Transcript of Who speaks ICF? Implementation of ICF in early childhood ... · an ICF training nor introduction...
Introduction
Germany passed a new participationlaw (Bundesteilhabegesetz) thatdeclares the use of the ICF asmandatory for rehabilitation andsocial institutions in Germany startingin 2018. Consequently, there is apush to develop ICF-oriented toolsand instruments, and the number ofinstruments for different purposes isincreasing. In 2016 the ICF ResearchInstitute (IRIs) at MSH MedicalSchool Hamburg started a project“ICF Mapping” with the primaryobjective of exploring the status ofICF use in all EICs in Germany aswell as the learning/training needs ofthe EIC professionals.
Who speaks ICF? Implementation of ICF in early childhood
intervention centers in Germany
Within the last year, the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) has become well-known in early childhood intervention centers (EICs) in Germany. Started in 2016, the “ICF Mapping Project” is a project that aims to systematically review ICF usage in the EICs. We conducted a survey in 2017 and again in July 2018. In this poster, we present the results of the follow-up survey sent to all EICs in Germany (N=1000).
22-27 October 2018 Seoul, Republic of Korea
Poster Number 108
WHO - FAMILY OF INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATIONS NETWORK ANNUAL MEETING 2018
Authors: Liane Simon1,2, Sven Kottysch1, Alexander Mevs1, Julia Paulsen1
1: ICF Research Institute at MSH Medical School Hamburg Germany 2: ICF Research Branch, a cooperation partner within the
WHO Collaborating Centre for the Family of International Classifications in Germany (at DIMDI)
Methods & Materials
Acknowledgements
Recap 2017 Results
The results of a first survey (in 2017)was presented at the 2017 WHO-FICAnnual Meeting. A follow-up surveytook place online in July 2018 usingthe same questionnaire as in 2017with only one additional questionaddressing the use of newly developedneeds assessments. We sent the linkto the online survey to the heads of allEICs in Germany (n=1000).
Discussion /Conclusions
Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales (2017) Bundesteilhabegesetz. [Internet]. Available at: www.bmas.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/PDF-Meldungen/2016/bundesteilhabegesetz.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=7. Accessed 7 August 2018.
Simon, L., Kottysch, S. Irmler, M., Kindervater, A.(2017):Do you speak ICF? Poster 2nd international symposium on ICF education, Cape Town, South Africa.
Kottysch, S., Simon, L., Mevs, A., Paulsen, J. (2018): Implementation of the ICF in early childhood intervention centres in Germany, Poster 3rd
International Symposion in ICF Education, Hamburg, Germany
Abstract
The EICs across Germany’s 16 Federalstates are in various stages of ICFimplementation. Figure 1 shows theallocation of the 329 returnedresponses to the 2017 survey (n2017)to federal states, showing regionaldifferences in usage.
Figure 1: use of ICF in the 16 provinces of Germany in 2017 (multiple answers possible)
Figure 2: How do you use ICF? Answers of 164 EICs in Germany (multiple answers possible)
In the 2018 sample, 46 EICsindicated that they do not use the ICFin any way (-25.2 percentage points).The majority has not participated inan ICF training nor introduction class(-1.9 percentage points).
Figure 3: 27 of 46 EICs not using the ICF have indicated that they have not participated in an ICF training nor introduction class.
Figure 4: Use of ICF in the 16 German states in 2018 (multiple answers possible)
The new German participation lawexplicitly requires the use of the ICF. Acomplete reform of the social systemover the next few years is planned.Accordingly the use of the ICF in EICsis also increasing.
The results of the 2017 and 2018surveys show that in 2018 the use ofICF checklists (29.9%) and of ICFcodes in intervention plans (30.5%)have increased compared to the 2017(13.4% and 21% respectively). For thefirst time, ICF-based needs assessmentprocedures developed by theresponsible authorities were also usedby 23 EICs (14%).
The survey results also show that:• There is a strong need for training
classes.
• Also needed are ICF -based
instruments that are especially
suitable for daily routine practice in
EICs and for assessing needs in early
childhood in general.
• The increasing variety of ICF-based
assessments and instruments
requires a more detailed analysis.
The 164 survey responses in 2018 can be allocated to 14 federal states. We did not receive answers from 2 states (see figure 4).
Of the 1000 questionnaires sent out to
the EICs in 2018 164 were returned
(n2018), rendering a §of 16,4% (-16.5
percentage points compared to 2017).
In our sample (n2018=164), 118 EICs
indicated that they are using the ICF in
different ways (+25.5 percentage
points compared to 2017):
• 93 EICs use ICF as a framework/
attitude (+6.7 percentage points)
• 49 EICs use the ICF-checklists
(+12.9 percentage points)
• 50 EICs use codes or ICF items for
intervention plans (-2.4 percentage
points)
© GeoBasis-DE / BKG (2017), data changed
Results of the 2018 Survey
ICF Mapping was funded by IRIs,MSH Medical School Hamburg,www.icf-research-institute.de
We thank Melissa Selb for her input.
![ICF-M770L/M770S/M770SL - Kazenice.kaze.com/sony_icf-m770sl_svm.pdf · ICF-M770L/M770S/M770SL no mark: common (): ICF-M770L []: ICF-M770S 〈〈 〉〉: ICF-M770SL AM IF ADJUSTMENT](https://static.fdocuments.in/doc/165x107/5f05960a7e708231d413b21e/icf-m770lm770sm770sl-icf-m770lm770sm770sl-no-mark-common-icf-m770l-.jpg)
