Which technology will be used to implement this interface? SI4 Project by Pierre Arnoux, Jérémy...
-
Upload
ashley-greene -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Which technology will be used to implement this interface? SI4 Project by Pierre Arnoux, Jérémy...
Which technology will be used to implement this interface?
SI4 Project byPierre Arnoux, Jérémy Benabu, Steve Colombié and Xavier Gentile
Supervised by Mireille Blay-Fornarino and Sébastien Mosser
Friday, 12th June, 2009
1
StructureStructureProject contextPHP user interfaceJSF user interfaceComparisonConclusion
2Project context › PHP user interface › JSF user interface › Comparison › Conclusion
Project context Project context › Existent› Existent
Project context › PHP user interface › JSF user interface › Comparison › Conclusion 3
PhotosEvents
Menus
INTERFACE (to do)
Bad way!Data base
Good way!
Project context Project context › Objectives› ObjectivesWhich technology is the best?
Project context › PHP user interface › JSF user interface › Comparison › Conclusion 4
STRUTS ?.NET ?PHP ?JSP/JSF ?…
PHP ?JSF ?
Project context Project context › Objectives› ObjectivesCriteria to compare
Diffusion & reliabilityInstallation costUse costInteroperability
Project context › PHP user interface › JSF user interface › Comparison › Conclusion 5
Project context Project context › Planning› Planning
planning
Project context › PHP user interface › JSF user interface › Comparison › Conclusion 6
Use of existing Web ServicesUse of existing Web Services
Jérémy Benabu & Steve Colombié
Pierre Arnoux & Xavier Gentile
Jérémy Benabu & Steve Colombié
Pierre Arnoux & Xavier Gentile
PHP user interfacePHP user interfaceNUSOAP library
Easy installationWell documented Lot of examples
ApachePHP is executed by the serverEasy PHP
Project context › PHP user interface › JSF user interface › Comparison › Conclusion 7
Index.phpIndex.phpIndex.phpIndex.phpMenusMenusMenusMenus
DeleteDeleteDeleteDelete
ModifyModifyModifyModify
CreateCreateCreateCreate
ListingListingListingListing
CoursesCoursesCoursesCourses
CreateCreateCreateCreate DeleteDeleteDeleteDelete
ModifyModifyModifyModifyListingListingListingListing
ProxyProxy ProxyProxy
Courses_proxiesCourses_proxiesCourses_proxiesCourses_proxies Menus_proxiesMenus_proxiesMenus_proxiesMenus_proxies
ProxyProxyProxyProxy
NuSOAPNuSOAP NuSOAPNuSOAP
nusoapnusoapnusoapnusoap
ClassClass.ClassClass.
nusoapmimenusoapmimenusoapmimenusoapmime
PHP user interface PHP user interface › Architecture› Architecture
Project context › PHP user interface › JSF user interface › Comparison › Conclusion 8
PHP user interface PHP user interface › Development› DevelopmentClass Proxy (client):
Call web service with WSDLCall methods
Classes Courses / MenusUse their own proxy ObjectOne file for each functionnality
Easy to call a method (by generic function) Complex to receive parameters
Project context › PHP user interface › JSF user interface › Comparison › Conclusion 9
ProxyServerWSDL
Request
SOAPClient
Answer
PHP user interface PHP user interface › Demonstration› Demonstration
Project context › PHP user interface › JSF user interface › Comparison › Conclusion 10
JSF user interface JSF user interface › Architecture› Architecture
Project context › PHP user interface › JSF user interface › Comparison › Conclusion 11
JSF Pages
Managed Bean
WebServices
Java-based Web Application framework JSF uses a component-based approach
JSF user interface JSF user interface › Development› DevelopmentManaged Bean :
Getting WSDL’s Webservice Creating methods
Calling the WebService methods intuitively Called by JSF pages easily
Project context › PHP user interface › JSF user interface › Comparison › Conclusion 12
Managed Bean
Controller
Web Service
WSDL
JSF user interface JSF user interface › Demonstration› Demonstration
Project context › PHP user interface › JSF user interface › Comparison › Conclusion 13
ComparisonComparison
Project context › PHP user interface › JSF user interface › Comparison › Conclusion 14
JAVA API
VersusJSF PHP
ComparisonComparison
Project context › PHP user interface › JSF user interface › Comparison › Conclusion 15
ComparisonComparison
Project context › PHP user interface › JSF user interface › Comparison › Conclusion 16
ComparisonComparison
Project context › PHP user interface › JSF user interface › Comparison › Conclusion 17
ComparisonComparison
Project context › PHP user interface › JSF user interface › Comparison › Conclusion 18
Comparison Comparison › Results› ResultsJSF is reliable (it’s a standard made by Sun)
JSF is lighter than PHP to build interfaces.
JSF is easier and lighter to use than PHP for managing types (int, String…) .
JSF isn’t trivial to use, learning is needed.
We have chosen JSF
Project context › PHP user interface › JSF user interface › Comparison › Conclusion 19
ConclusionConclusionJSF will be used to implement the
user interfaces of the project jSeduite.
In our report we had made a tutorial about JSF and how to use it.
It was interesting to compare two great technologies.
Project context › PHP user interface › JSF user interface › Comparison › Conclusion 20