Where will our food come in the future?
Transcript of Where will our food come in the future?
1
Where will our food
come in the future?
Tim Lang
Centre for Food Policy, City University London
Paper to Sustainability West Midlands, Birmingham, January 26, 2011
2
Introduction
• 2000s: UK slowly realises C20th food is unsustainable
• But what is a sustainable food system?
• What do we do about it, if we knew?– Leave it to markets / Govt / companies /
consumers?
– Do nothing?
• The C20th food system is in stress (new/old):
• Policy frameworks are emerging but inadequate
• Coalition Gov’t agenda still unclear– Emphases on local, Big Society, rural but how?
The data suggest a complex
array of problems which interact• Environment:
– Eg climate change, H2O, soil, etc
• Health: – Eg Under-/ over-/mal-consumption
• Social stress: – Eg Inequalities within & between countries
• Quality:– New adulteration issues, cultural change
• Economy: – Eg labour, skills, distorted prices
4
5
The coincidence of ‘New (+ some
‘old’) Fundamentals’ in C21st
Chatham House Food project 2006-09 etc
• Climate change
• Fuel / oil / energy
• Water
• Land use
• Biodiversity
• Labour
• Population (9bn 2050)
• Urbanisation
• Affluence (BRICs +)
• Inequality
• Nutrition transition
• Healthcare costs
• Waste
Number of undernourished people in the
world, 1969-71 to 2010Source: FAO briefing Sept 2010 based on data from: FAO (2010) The State of Food Insecurity in the World:
Addressing food security in protracted crises. FAO/WFP (released in October 2010). www.fao.org/hunger.
6
Global food prices:
the FAO Food Price
Index 2006-10
source: FAO
http://www.fao.org/worldfoodsituation/F
oodPricesIndex/en/ [accessed 19 Dec 2010]
Conventional economist see trouble ahead:
OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2019 prices will be lower than 2008 but higher than before
Source: OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2010-2019
9
Food Security, i.e. stability over time for:
FOOD UTILISATION
FOOD ACCESS
•Affordability•Allocation•Preference
•Nutritional Value•Social Value•Food Safety
FOOD AVAILABILITY
•Production•Distribution•Exchange
EnvironmentalWelfare
• Ecosystem stocks & flows
• Ecosystem services• Planetary
Boundaries
Social Welfare• Income• Employment • Wealth• Social capital• Political capital• Human capital
Food System OUTCOMES Contributing to:
Food System ACTIVITIES
Producing food: natural resources, inputs, markets, …
Processing & packaging food: raw materials, standards, storage requirement, …
Distributing & retailing food: transport, marketing, advertising, …
Consuming food: acquisition, preparation, customs, …
The GECAFS Food System Concept
INPUTS
eg, agrichemicals, pharmaceuticals,
equipment
PRIMARY PRODUCTION
farming, fishing, horticulture
PROCESSING & MANUFACTURE
DISTRIBUTION & LOGISTICS
eg, national/international, import/export
RETAIL
eg, supermarkets,
shops
CATERING
restaurants, public
sector
DOMESTIC FOOD
PREPARATION
International Organizations
Policy guidelines, advice, etc
Regional bodies
Regulations, law, subsidies,
etc
National governments
Laws, regulations,
subsidies, etc
Socio-cultural
influences, eg
religion, gender,
family
Consciousness
industries, eg
advertising, media
Health, hygiene
controls
Environmental
‘givens’ eg climate,
water, land,
biodiversity
Civil society
organisations
Social policies
Human labour, skills &
education
Research,
development,
engineering &
technology
Centre for Food Policy: System, influences and outcomes flowchart
Local governments Laws,
regulations, subsidies, etc
Social impact Waste & biological
outflow eg pollutants
Energy & material
outflow
Economic drivers
eg price, profits
Health / ill-healthcultural impact
Finance capital
CONTEXT
SHAPING FORCES
INSTITUTIONS
OUTCOMES
2000s: tectonic plates move
• Environment: climate change, soil, water etc.
• Resilience: 2000 Lorry strike ‘5 days from shortages’
– Food resilience in question:
MoD / Cranfield Defra study / Chatham House
• Economy: 2006-08 commodity price spike
Food Matters (HMT PMSU):
Companies worry about UK buying power
• Health: 2000-07 obesity crisis grows
National Audit Office (2001), Wanless (2002+04),
CMO (2003), Commons Health Comm.ee (2004),
Chief Scientist’s Foresight report (2008)14
Meanwhile, Govt reform begins• 1990s: MAFF in crisis over food safety, BSE…
• 1997: Blair and ‘new’ Labour elected
• 2000: creation of FSA, Environ’t Agency, SDC
• 2001: Curry Commission focus on enviro + farm
modernisation
• 2006-08: global food rises G Brown review
• 2008: Cabinet Office Food Matters report
• 2009: SDC Setting the Table Integrated Advice to
Consumers
• 2010: Defra Food 2030 commits to Sust Diets
• 2010: Coalition Food Business Plan 2011-201515
1616
SDC Setting the Table - diet• no definition of ‘sustainable diet’ yet agreed but
stakeholders see need for one
• Identified 10 key guidelines for sustainable diets
• Reviewed 44 published academic research studies and reports
• Found more positive synergies (win-wins) than tensions (win-lose) eg– Lowering consumption of low nutritional value foods
(fatty/sugary foods & drinks) has mainly +ve impacts on health, environment and reducing social inequalities.
• Found gaps in the evidence, most notably with respect to economic impacts of dietary changes.
• Produced a 3-level hierarchy of behavioural impact
17
4. Realisation we need to aim for
sustainable production and
consumption (but that means
tackling consumer choice)
Policy has a difficult mix:
• A material world with limits
• A biological world which is fragile
• Human physiology created c.500k yrs ago
• A food system delivering ‘feast day’ food daily
• Price signals which don’t internalise costs
• Advertising and marketing distorting needs by
amplifying wants
• Government reluctant to direct consumers
• Consumers who believe they have choice18
The result?
• Unsustainable Food Production
• Unsustainable Food Supply Chains
• Unsustainable modes of Retailing
• Unsustainable Diets
• Unsustainable Waste
19
What can we do? Options
• Focus on consumers?
– Label, educate, inform, appeal to do ‘right thing’
• Focus upstream?
– Change food composition, ‘choice-edit’
• Alter land use?
– Meat & dairy are key ‘hotspot
• Do nothing?
– But pressure is building up
• Leave it to EU? Others?
20
Corporation initiatives: eg Barilla
• Source: Barilla Centre for Food & Nutrition
http://www.barillacfn.com/en Nov 2010
23
Policy positions in UK vary
• ‘It’s all dangerous, so avoid, ignore & resist’:– Small business, some big business, right wing
• ‘Business-as-usual’ (consumer responsibility):– Pragmatists, some sections of business
• ‘leave it to companies’: (single company action)– Eg Unilever 2010; PepsiCo
• ‘Sustainable intensification’: (production focus)– Chief Scientist’s Foresight project (Jan 2011), FAO Sust’ble
Crop Intensific’n Div
• ‘Whole system change’: (structural focus)– Policy outer circle eg SDC, NGOs, small green businesses
25
Eg, if we are serious, Sust Diet means…
26
Change
from …
…to… …with trouble
ahead over…
Nutrition
guidelines
Eco-nutrition
guidelines
linking calories with
carbon
Food products Total diet Eco-brand images
Control green
claims
Verifiable
standards
Advertising and
marketing
Global all year
sourcing
Sustainable
seasonality
Defining
sustainability
Low cost food
as a good
Full cost
accounting
Consumer
expectations
We’ll change what & how we eat
FOOD WHY WHAT
Meat Cancer; water;
land use
Offer less; mainly or
only grass-fed
Coffee / tea Water; labour
conditions
Less; only fair trade;
drink water
Fruit All year round? Seasonal
Fish Health vs. fish
stock collapse
Eat less; only
MSC?; alternatives
Vegetables Health; water;
GHGs; Kenyan
beans?
Seasonal greens
27
28
Companies engaging• International companies:
– 2002: SAI launched Groupe Danone, Nestlé, Unilever
– 2009 (Oct 16): G30 top TNCs initiative Coca-Cola, Tesco,
Unilever, News International
– 2010: World Economic Forum process (out 2011)
• UK companies:
– 2007: IGD Food Industry Sustainability Strategy
Champions Group focus on low carbon + ethics
– 2008: Tesco gives £25m Manchester SCI
– 3 retailers’ choice-edit M&S Plan A, Co-operative Group, Waitrose
• A product specific approach, not overall diet
Governments start to act (but
focus on consumer choice)• Sweden publishes Environmentally Effective
Food Choices (2009) = 1st Sustainable Diet document
• Appeals to responsible consumers & agri-food chain
• Germany: Council on SD’s shopping advice
• NL: Towards Sustainable Production & Consumption (June 2008)
• France: INRA-CIRAD sustainable food systems (2009-11)
• UK: Integrated Advice to Consumers (led by Food Standards Agency)
29
Civil society / NGOs• Bubbling UK ‘democratic experimentalism’
– Sustain: www.sustainweb.org.uk
– WWF: One Planet Diet Livewell Plate (2011)
– CIWF: ‘eat less meat’ campaign
– Friends of the Earth: meat campaign
– Fife Diet (Vancouver 100 mile diet)
– Food4Life project (2006-11): school food
• International NGO debates about:
– Need to go beyond ingredients to processes
– Full labelling being too complex; can lead to
‘blame the consumer’? [SDC agrees] 30
New Coalition Government
• Focus on cuts:
– Axeing central gov’t and arms-length bodies
– FSA, HPA, SDC, RCEP, CFPA, SACN, etc
• Hints that Food 2030 strategy to remain in
some form with focus on delivery
• Health Responsibility Deals to ‘work with not
against business’ (Alcohol, fitness, food, behaviour, work)
• Infrastructure uncertainties ahead
– Research, Skills, Education, Standards32
Policy future is less certain
• Language change: ‘Sustainable Diets’ out,
but ‘low impact diets’ might be in
• Pressure from Foresight Future of Food
and Farming report (Jan 2011) on
• Meanwhile some business worries & acts:
– PepsiCo UK commits to lower many impacts
by 50% in 5 years (but not to sell less Pepsi!)
– Tesco audits for embedded water
– Sainsbury has its ‘Storecard’ (private system)
– M&S Plan A, Co-op, etc = ‘choice editing’ 33
Conclusions• Food system symbolises wider challenges
– Complex but not incomprehensible
– It requires multi-level /-sector /-disciplinary work
– It links material, biological, cognitive and social
• How to translate this Regional frameworks
– RDAs replaced by LEPs; no clear regions
– Fiscal tightening yet belief in business
• Can we generate leadership & incentives?
Yes, but how and who acts is up for grabs
34