AFSC – On the LineAFSC – On the Line

Where we are . . . where we are GoingWhere we are . . . where we are Going

MG WADE H. MCMANUS, JR.MG WADE H. MCMANUS, JR.

Commanding General,Commanding General,

HQ, Army Field Support CommandHQ, Army Field Support Command

Joint Munitions Command

Joint Field SupportCommand

Joint Munitions Command

Army FieldSupport Command

Joint MunitionsCommand

Field Support Command

Past Present Future

2 of 18

�Munitions Readiness Report (MRR)�Centralized Ammunition Management (CAM)�Strategic Munitions Distribution Network (SMDN)� Joint Munitions Command (JMC)�Potential AMC End State�Evolution to a Joint Organization�Way Ahead

3 of 18

Where?The MRR is on the SIPRNETAt http://207.85.78.130/mrr

What?A standard methodology

for determining munitionsreadiness

When?Readiness calculated for current asset posture andat six month periods for

24 months

Why?To objectively determine

the right mix of munitionsto buy and maintain tosupport the warfighter

Developed fromAR 220-1

4 of 18

Army Munitions ReadinessWorldwide View

As of 31 Dec 03

5 of 18

Log Watchboard … real timereporting of component logistics

status for critical log functional areaswith drill down

Log Watchboard … real timereporting of component logistics

status for critical log functional areaswith drill down

Access to full range of log toolsproviding access to log

information (GTN, JTAV, etc.)and Decision Support Tools

Access to full range of log toolsproviding access to log

information (GTN, JTAV, etc.)and Decision Support Tools

Integrated into MC ’02 CROP …access through Ops or Plans

Integrated into MC ’02 CROP …access through Ops or Plans

Log Functional Areas …theater Prepo assets,

APOD/SPOD lay-down,medical/engineer reports,sustainment resources and

plans

Log Functional Areas …theater Prepo assets,

APOD/SPOD lay-down,medical/engineer reports,sustainment resources and

plans

Situational awareness …operational maps with logistics

support overlays

Situational awareness …operational maps with logistics

support overlays

6 of 18

� Automate input of all production schedules, regardless ofprocurement site, into MRR database

� Address distribution problems; individual geographic shortagesnot visible on Worldwide view

� Improve programming support for scenario-driven analyses

� Use DA-approved near-term requirements vs. QWARRM toprovide a better near-term analysis tool

� Develop capability to forecast future CONOPS and mobilizationtraining requirements

� Align with POM process: MRR addresses near term (2 years);budget addresses programming decisions out to 7 years

� Engage all Services support to develop a Joint MRR

MRR Challenge for the FutureMRR Challenge for the Future

7 of 18

Centralized Ammunition ManagementCentralized Ammunition ManagementConcept of OperationsConcept of Operations

JMCJMC

GarrisonGarrisonAmmoAmmo

ManagerManagerTAMIS-RTAMIS-RTrainingTraining

AuthorizationsAuthorizations

SAAS-MODSAAS-MODASP StockASP StockOn HandOn Hand

ASP

ConsolidatedResupply

ABLCSABLCSBasic LoadBasic Load

RequirementsRequirements

Determine Delta /Optimize Inventory

Pick up Ammo

CSA LTTF INITIATIVECSA LTTF INITIATIVE

MACOMTraining &

DeploymentRequirements

Enhance strategic mobility/deployability

Reduce the sustainment footprintReduce cost of logistics while maintaining warfighting capability and readiness

8 of 18

Habitual relationshipsdeveloped during monthly re-supply will enhance cooperation between

depots and deploying units.

Centralized Ammunition ManagementCentralized Ammunition Management

TooeleArmy Depot

Crane ArmyAmmo Activity

McAlester ArmyAmmo Plant

Blue GrassArmy Depot

9 of 18

CAM Accomplishments & BenefitsCAM Accomplishments & Benefits

� Streamlined ammunitionresupply process

� Directing SWA reset/retrogradeshipments

� Reduced Mobilization trainingpackage cycle time from 30 to

5-10 days� Provided ABL support to 2nd

ACR Task Force and 1st CAV

� Customer focus� Tracking visibility� Better stockpile management� Reduced transportation costs� Increased safety� Better training ammunition

distribution� Frees up ammo storage space� Potential joint service

application

Accomplishments Benefits

10 of 18

The CAM Challenge for the FutureThe CAM Challenge for the Future

�Phase I – CONUS Training�FORSCOM, TRADOC, NG/AR, MEDCOM

�Phase II – OCONUS Training

�Phase III – CONUS and OCONUSdeployment packages

�Phase IV – Joint Service application

Detailed milestones under development based onmunitions redistribution and full systems integration via

Logistics Modernization Program (LMP)

11 of 18

SCOPE

Estimate 44,000 Annual Shipments

59% are Less than Truck Load (LTL) Shipments

Average Truck Load is 35,694 pounds/$2,143

$120 per short ton

Average LTL is 2,844 pounds/$1,327$933 per short ton

BACKGROUND

18-month GAO study illustrated lack of efficiency in consolidating munitions

loads

We are basically spending a lot of dollars to ship air

SMDN concept provides an opportunity to consolidate motor

movements

BENEFITS

Provides an opportunityfor increased visibility

Reduces number of trucks on the road

Reduces public exposureto munitions carriers

Eliminates unnecessarycosts

Strategic Munitions Distribution NetworkStrategic Munitions Distribution Network(SMDN)(SMDN)

12 of 18

� Multiple small shipments to numerous destinations• Inefficient requisitioning and transportation

� Too many carriers on the road• Harder to track visibility.

� To many small shipments• Increases costs• Hard to adjust work schedules

� Multiple small shipments to numerous destinations• Inefficient requisitioning and transportation

� Too many carriers on the road• Harder to track visibility.

� To many small shipments• Increases costs• Hard to adjust work schedules

FT.BRAGG

FTPOLK

CAMPLEJEINE

FTHOOD

FTSILL

ANNISTONAD

ANNISTONAD

SUNNYPOINT

Strategic Munitions Distribution NetworkStrategic Munitions Distribution Network(SMDN) Present(SMDN) Present

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

�Shipments < 1000 #s = 29% of traffic�60% of Shipment not to / from tier 1 depots�Shipments < 1000 #s = 29% of traffic�60% of Shipment not to / from tier 1 depots

Pounds (K)

Ship

men

ts (K

)

Shipment Weight Distribution18 Months Data

LTLConsolidation

Potential

13 of 18

Regional Network

Inter-regional Connection

Strategic Munitions Distribution NetworkStrategic Munitions Distribution Network(SMDN) Future(SMDN) Future

Blue GrassArmy Depot

TooeleArmy Depot

McAlester ArmyAmmo Plant

Crane ArmyAmmo Activity

Within a region, send small (LTL)shipments to the regional hub

• Regional hubs consolidate intotruckload and send to other hubs

• Other hubs breakdown \ mergeinto truckload shipments.

14 of 18

Joint OrdnanceCommanders’

Group

Joint LogisticsCommanders

Single Commandfor all StrategicAmmo Products

and Services

Maintaining an Integrated Ammunition Enterprise Perspective

Ammo Production

Direct Support from CONUS to the Battle Force or Training Site

Ammo Storage

NAVAIR ArmyNAVSEAUSAF

USMCFMS

Posts,Camps &Stations

AllServices

Other GovtAgencies

Industrial Base MgtImplement SecArmy

“Way-Ahead”� Integrate� Consolidate� Divest� Lease

� Time Definite Delivery� Continuous Seamless Flow� Technical & Logistical Support

� Fully Integrated Logistics

DefenseMunitionsCenters

MunitionsReadinessReporting

StockpileManagement

EnhanceStrategicMobility

Transportation

Reduce SustainmentFootprint

CentralizedAmmunitionManagement

15 of 18

DefenseMunitionsCenters

Focus is Requirements & Capability vs. Infrastructure

What Will A Defense Munitions CenterWhat Will A Defense Munitions CenterLook Like In The 21Look Like In The 21stst Century? Century?

Out-loadingOut-loading StorageStorage

Research andDevelopmentResearch andDevelopment

TerminalOperationsTerminal

Operations

Centralized Ammunition Management

Centralized Ammunition Management

Maintenance/Renovation

Maintenance/Renovation

DemilitarizationDemilitarization

Production(Sized to Peacetime

+ Small Surge)

Production(Sized to Peacetime

+ Small Surge) Infuse AdvancedTechnologyCapability

Infuse AdvancedTechnologyCapability

16 of 18

Theater SupportCommands OPCON

To CombatantCommanders1

UltimatelyAFSC becomes

Army Component CmdTo Joint LogCommand

DoD

CombatantCommandersTRANSCOM Department

of the Army

ArmyMateriel

Command

Army FieldSupport

Command

AirMobility

Command

SystemsSupport

Command

SecurityAssistanceCommand

Research,Devel & Engr

Command

ChemicalMaterialsAgency

JointMunitionsCommand

SurfaceDeployment &

DistributionCommand

DLA

TheaterSupport

Commands

FutureJoint Log Command

17 of 18

JTSC JTSC

JTSC JTSC

Supply Chain Integration Efforts“Global Logistics Command”or

“Joint Logistics Command”

TRANSCOM - DISTRIBUTION PROCESS OWNER

Service Log Commands - Remain with Services

AFSC - Integrating, synchronizing, coordinatingorganization to assure hand-off to the TSC isseamless allowing the TSC to run the COMMZ andsustain the Combatant Commander

TRANSCOMJoint Field Support

Command

AFSC/JMC+

AMC+

TSCs

AFSC/JMC+

AMC+

TSCs+

SDDC

JFSC/JMC+

AMC/DLA+

TSCs+

TRANSCOM

GLC

SDDCMSCAMC

DLA Service LogCommands

JTSC JMC

18 of 18

� Joint end state… Capabilities based

� Drive Transformation… Expeditionary Mind Set

� Integration of Distribution & DES is key challenge

� Links industrial base and acquisition policy… ESSENTIAL

� Balancing funding stream & readiness

Funding, capacity, capability, privatization, global supplychange…… still issues to be addressed

19 of 18

20 of 18

� Manage wholesale and retail ammunition stocks as a unified whole� Provide better training ammunition distribution by using Velocity Management� Utilize a Phased Approach� Create a Logistics Transformation seamless process

� CG, FORSCOM asked Joint Munitions Command to consider Centralized Ammunition Management as a Transformation Task

� CSA Critical LTTF initiative #22, Class V Ammo Management

� Includes Ammunition Basic Load/Training ammunition

� Initial partnership: FORSCOM – JMC – ACSIM

21 of 18

Centralized Ammunition ManagementCentralized Ammunition ManagementProcessesProcesses

Dept of Army, Major Command or

Joint Service� Who gets ammo

� Major Command allocation� Unit authorization

� What ammo they get� DODIC and Quantity

� When they need ammo� Training date� Deployment (i.e. 96 hours)

� Where they need ammo� Training range� Deployment site

� Execute decisions� Right ammo, right place,

right time to support unittraining and deployment

� Visibility and Tracking� Determine Trigger Point� Stock Rotation� Consolidate Loads

� Installation ManagementAgency operates ASP

Joint Munitions Command

22 of 18

Strategic Munitions Distribution Network (SMDN) Concept

ANNISTON ADFT HOOD

REGION I

“TO-BE”Within a region small (LTL)shipments are sent into theregional hub.Example: MCAAP willconsolidate into truckloadaccording to regionaldestination and send toBGAD. BGAD willbreakdown and consolidateinto truck load for $$$ finalcost.

CARRIER AMCALESTER

FT POLK

FT HOOD

FT SILL

REGION IVCARRIER B

FT. BRAGG

SUNNY POINT

MDC OPS

CONSOLIDATIONMDC OPS

CONSOLIDATION

ING

ATE

OU

TGA

TE

CAMP LEJEUNE

BGAD

CARRIER A

ANNISTON AD

GOVERNMENT RESPONSIBILITY

PICK-UP/STOP-OFF

“AS-IS”Concept shows multiple small shipments to anumber of destinations – Inefficientrequisitioning and transportation process.

Too many carriers on the road – harder to track visibility.To many small shipments – increases costs – hard to adjust work schedules SUNNY POINT

CAMP LEJEINE

FT POLK

FT SILL

FT. BRAGG

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

500 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 More

LBS REPRESENTED 29% OF AA&E TRAFFIC

WEIGHT BREAKS

NU

MB

ER O

F SH

IPM

ENTS

POTENTIAL LTL CONSOLIDATION

60% OF SHIPMENTS NOT ORIGINATING/DESTINED TIER I DEPOTS

60% OF SHIPMENTS NOT ORIGINATING/DESTINED TIER I DEPOTS

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

500 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 More0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

500 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 More

BOTTOM LINE: DOD SHIPS SMALL LOTS OF AA&E TO A WIDE VARIETY OF DESTINATIONS

WEIGHT BREAKS

NU

MB

ER O

F SH

IPM

ENTS

POTENTIAL LTL CONSOLIDATION

TIER I DEPOTS 60% OF SHIPMENTS NOT ORIGINATING/DESTINED TIER I DEPOTS

SHIPMENT WEIGHT DISTRIBUTION –18 MONTH GFM DATA

SHIPMENTS WEIGHING LESS THAN 1,000 SHIPMENTS WEIGHING LESS THAN 1,000 LBS REPRESENTED 29% OF AA&E TRAFFIC

MDC OPSMDC OPS

CONSOLIDATION

ING

ATE

OU

TGATE