What We Will Discuss Social Services Realignment What programs were Realigned How the funding is...
-
Upload
stephany-gilbert -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of What We Will Discuss Social Services Realignment What programs were Realigned How the funding is...
What We Will DiscussWhat We Will Discuss
2
What Social Services What Social Services Programs Were Realigned?Programs Were Realigned?
3
How Did County Sharing Ratios How Did County Sharing Ratios Change?Change?
4
Purpose For Social ServicesPurpose For Social Services
5
How is Realignment How is Realignment Funded?Funded?
6
County Approaches to RealignmentCounty Approaches to Realignment
7
Realignment as Realignment as Fund Source for MOE’sFund Source for MOE’s
Maintenance of effort for mandated social services programs
County GF reflective of priorities and perception of sufficient realignment funding
Funding changes driven by population and caseload growth
Placer County example◦ Huge population growth and caseload demands
since Realignment◦ Insufficient Realignment funding to cover
mandated program costs8
Realignment Base FundingRealignment Base Funding
9
Realignment Caseload Realignment Caseload Growth FundingGrowth Funding
10
Caseload Growth IssuesCaseload Growth Issues
CalWORKs Caseload Growth Exception◦ County share decreased (11% to 5%)◦ Increased caseload = Decreased caseload
growthFoster Care/Group Home Rate Increase
◦ 32% Rate increase retro to December 2009◦ Higher rate = higher caseload growth
IHSS as Caseload Growth Driver◦ Significant increased costs translate to significant
caseload growth over time
11
Realignment General Realignment General Growth FundingGrowth Funding
12
Realignment ChallengesRealignment Challenges
13
Realignment Fund TransfersRealignment Fund Transfers
14
Mental Health
Social Services
Health Number of Counties
1993-94 $ 3.9 $ 5.9 $ -9.8 10 1994-95 $ -25.9 $ 80.3 $ -54.4 13 1995-96 $ 2.2 $ 7.9 $ -10.0 14 1996-97 $ -18.7 $ 26.7 $ -8.0 21 1997-98 $ -10.4 $ 12.6 $ -2.2 18 1998-99 $ -15.3 $ 10.8 $ 4.5 19 1999-2000 $ -10.3 $ 4.7 $ 5.6 16 2000-2001 $ -5.2 $ -3.2 $ 8.4 11 2001-02 $ -4.9 $ 21.2 $ -16.4 19 2002-03 $ -5.8 $ 31.0 $ -25.2 15 2003-04 $ -1.4 $ 11.3 $ -9.9 17 2004-05 $ 4.6 $ 4.5 $ -9.1 13 2005-06 $ 5.0 $ -.1 $ -4.9 15 2006-07 $ 8.4 $ -2.9 $ -5.1 17 2007-08 $ 5.9 $ -1.8 $ -4.4 9 2008-09 $ 6.7 $ -.1 $ -6.6 12 Totals $ -$61.2 $ +208.8 $ -147.5
Legislative ActionLegislative Action
Changes to base funding and distribution◦ 1992-93 Restoration◦ AB1716 (2003) Restoration
CWS/Foster Care/Adoptions◦ Increased program requirements
IHSS◦ Expanded eligibility, collective bargaining, and
Personal Care Services Program (PCSP) CalWORKsHuman Services Funding Deficit
◦ Funding shortfall leads to encroachment
15
Has Realignment WorkedHas Realignment Workedfor Social Services?for Social Services?
16
Funding ImplicationsFunding Implications
17
Funding Implications Funding Implications continuedcontinued
18
Are We Out of the Woods Yet?Are We Out of the Woods Yet?
19
2010-11 May Revision2010-11 May Revision
20
2010-11 May Revision – How 2010-11 May Revision – How Funded?Funded?
21
QuestionsQuestions
22