What Type of Urban Social Development We Want? by Noman … University_NAh… · Noman Ahmed URBAN...
Transcript of What Type of Urban Social Development We Want? by Noman … University_NAh… · Noman Ahmed URBAN...
What Type of Urban Social Development We Want?
by
Noman Ahmed
URBAN SOCIAL DEVELOPMENTAN OUTLINE FOR DISCUSSION
1. Inclusive – a process where initiatives andbenefits of development include all –including the urban poor communities
2. Participatory – where people engage withdecision making from the beginning – theyare not invited to ribbon cutting alone!
3. Non-physical dimensions – focusing on softinputs to community development – in health,education, social welfare, and disastermitigation – less brick and mortar, more inputon changing quality of human life
Negotiation for choices –A community in Thailand
Grameen Bank housing intervention – a people centered initiative
OPP technical assistance to people
Peoples development work supported by OPP
4. Provision for marginalized – creating anenvironment of acceptance and tolerancefor the marginalized to sustain and retainexistence in respective contexts –preventing persecution, discrimination andmarginalization
5. Re-defining poverty - Relating povertywith resourcelessness; denial of social,economic and cultural freedom; targetingfor victimization; inducing displacement;……….beyond the 1$ or 2$ a day labels!
Grameen mobilizing women
A view of community architects at work - Nepal
Internally displaced people -Pakistan
Internally displaced people -Pakistan
Grameen housing intervention -Bangladesh
6. Fresh appraisal of informality –
• Legality vs Legitimate
• Administrative sanction vs People’s validation
• (Informality) as a condition of transition vspunishment for squalor
7. Qualifying interventions and institutionalarrangements
• Accepting peoples organisations as legitimate
• Supporting and replicating solutions that are plannedand executed by people
• Modifying and adjusting mega projects to people’sconcerns
• Safeguarding environmental assets for communitysurvival and sustenance
• Re-visiting public policy via lessons from communitysuccesses