What is Shock Therapy
16
What is Shock Therapy? What Did it Do in Poland and Russia? Abstract: A prominent theorist of Soviet and East European economics critiques the vision of political and economic processes implicit in shock therapy, defending an alternative, evolutionary approach. The critique of shock therapy rests on both theoretical reasoning and examination of evidence from recent cases. An intensive study of economic change in Poland and Russia since the late-1980s concludes that, in both countries, shock therapy failed in its goal of implementing top-down reforms that by-pass existing political and social forces. The evolutionary approach, it is argued, holds the better prospect of generating economic progress that will be sustained over the long term, journal o\ Eronomir Literaturr, Clasrification Numbers: E61, L33, P21, P51. Apart from considerations of foreign policy, the attention of Russian society was at that time directed with special interest to the internal changes taking place in all departments of government. . . . Mean- while life-real everyday life, with its essential concerns of health and sickness, labor and rest, and its intellectual preoccupations with thought, science, poetry, music, love, friendship, hatred, passion- went on as usual, independent of and apart from all possible reforms (Lev Tolstoy, 1978, Volume 2, p. 156). ust four months after the abortive coup that led to the breakup of the Soviet Union, a small group of economists began to implement a pro- ram of radical reforms that aimed at irreversibly changing Russian I society. These reforms were condoned, if not endorsed, by the Interna- tional Monetary Fund; they were strongly encouraged, if only weakly aided, by Western governments; and they were promoted, if not designed, by the usual, peripatetic, Western economists. The present paper con- siders the Russian reforms in the wider context of the ongoing debate in the West concerning the advisability of these so-called shock therapy reforms. 'Professor of Economics, University of Maryland, College Park. The research for khis paper received support from the IRIS Center at the University of Maryland and benefited from the productive environment of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. I would like to thank Josef Brada, George Breslauer, Norbert Hornstein, Kazimierz Poznanski, and Peter Reddaway for helpful comments, Michael Svilar provided helpful research assistance. Post-Sonid Affnirs, 1993,9,2, pp. 111-140. Copyright (l 1993 by V. H. Winston & Son, Inc. All rights reserved.
description
Details regarding shock therapy in Poland
Transcript of What is Shock Therapy
110 JOSEF C, BRADA
Rogowski, Ronald, Commrrcr and Coaiitions. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989,
Schaffer, Mark E., "The Enterprise Sector and the Emergence of the Polish Fiscal Crisis 1990-91," Ironomica, forthcoming,
Schumpeter, Joseph A., Cupifalism. Sotialkrn and Demorraiy. New York: Harper, 1950. Spulber, Nichohs, The5tate and Etonomir Deurlopment in Easfrrn Europr. New York: Random
House, 1966, T i ~ k , Adlm, "Trends and Motives of Organizational Change in Hungarian Indus-
try-A Synchronic View,"]ouna/ o/ compurati~e EconomicsI 17, 2:366-384, June 1993. Vienna Institute for Comparative Economic Studies, "Transition from the Command
to the Market System: What Went Wrong and What to do Now?," mimeo, 1993. Whitesell, Robert S., "Why Does the Soviet Economy Appear to be Allocatively
Efficient?," Sovirt Studiri, 42,2:259-268, 1990. Williamson, Oliver E., Markets and Hrurrhier: Anuiyiii ond Anfitrust Inpiiiations. New
York: Free Press, 1975, Williamson, Oliver Eel The Eionolnic lnstitutioni of Copituliin. New York: Free Press, 1985. Williamson, Oliver E., "Contested Exchange Versus the Governance of Contractual
Relations," ,/ournu/ of Lonomii Rrrpettio~, 7,1:103-108, Winter 1993. Winiecki, Jan, "The Inevitability of a Fall in Output in the Early Stages of Transition to
the Market: Theoretical Underpinnings," Souhf Studies, 43,4:669-676,1991. Woo, Wing Thye, "The Art of Comparing Centrally-Planned Economies: Comparing
China, Poland and Russia," journal o\ Cotnparutiw iionomiis, forthcoming. Zhou, Huizhong, "Planning, Plan-Influencing and Market Fine-Tuning: Implications
for Economies in Transition," ]ournu/ of Comparafive Eronosiir, 17, 3:560-580, Fall 1993.
What is Shock Therapy? What Did it Do in Poland and Russia?
Abstract: A prominent theorist of Soviet and East European economics critiques the vision of political and economic processes implicit in shock therapy, defending an alternative, evolutionary approach. The critique of shock therapy rests on both theoretical reasoning and examination of evidence from recent cases. An intensive study of economic change in Poland and Russia since the late-1980s concludes that, in both countries, shock therapy failed in its goal of implementing top-down reforms that by-pass existing political and social forces. The evolutionary approach, it is argued, holds the better prospect of generating economic progress that will be sustained over the long term, journal o\ Eronomir Literaturr, Clasrification Numbers: E61, L33, P21, P51.
Apart from considerations of foreign policy, the attention of Russian society was at tha t time directed wi th special interest t o t h e internal changes taking place in all departments of government. . . . Mean- while life-real everyday life, with its essential concerns of health and sickness, labor and rest, and its intellectual preoccupations with thought, science, poetry, music, love, friendship, hatred, passion- went on as usual, independent of and apart from all possible reforms (Lev Tolstoy, 1978, Volume 2, p. 156).
ust four months after the abortive coup that led to the breakup of the Soviet Union, a small group of economists began to implement a pro-
ram of radical reforms that aimed at irreversibly changing Russian I society. These reforms were condoned, if not endorsed, by the Interna- tional Monetary Fund; they were strongly encouraged, if only weakly aided, by Western governments; and they were promoted, if not designed, by the usual, peripatetic, Western economists. The present paper con- siders the Russian reforms in the wider context of the ongoing debate in the West concerning the advisability of these so-called shock therapy reforms.
'Professor of Economics, University of Maryland, College Park. The research for khis paper received support from the IRIS Center at the University of Maryland and benefited from the productive environment of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. I would like to thank Josef Brada, George Breslauer, Norbert Hornstein, Kazimierz Poznanski, and Peter Reddaway for helpful comments, Michael Svilar provided helpful research assistance.
Post-Sonid Affnirs, 1993,9,2, pp. 111-140. Copyright (l 1993 by V. H. Winston & Son, Inc. All rights reserved.
