What is a Task

8/13/2019 What is a Task

1/21

What is a Task?

By task, I mean a goal-oriented activity with a clear purpose. Doing a communication task involves achieving

an outcome, creating a final product that can be appreciated by other. Examples include compiling a list of

reasons, features, or things that need doing under particular circumstances; comparing two pictures and/ortexts to find the differences; and solving a problem or designing a brochure.

Tasks can be used as the central component of a three part framework: "pre-task," "task cycle," and

"language focus." These components have been carefully designed to create four optimum conditions for

language acquisition, and thus provide rich learning opportunities to suit different types of learners. Figure 1

outlines the roles of the teacher and learners during a task-based learning (TBL) lesson. Note especially the

degree of teacher control, and the opportunities for learner language use.

Figure 1: Task Based Learning Framework

Components of a TBL Framework

PRE TASK PHASE

INtrODUCTION TO TOPIC AND TASK

Teacher explores the topic with the class, highlights useful words and phrases, and helps learners

understand task instructions and prepare. Learners may hear a recording of others doing a similar task, or

read part of a text as a lead in to a task.

TASK CYCLE

TASK

Students do the task, in pairs or

small groups. Teacher monitors

from a distance, encouraging all

attempts at communication, not

correcting. Since this situation has

PLANNING

Students prepare to report to the

whole class (orally or in writing)

how they did the task, what they

decided or discovered. Since the

report stage is public, students

REPORT

Some groups present their reports

to the class, or exchange written

reports, and compare results.

Teacher acts as a chairperson, and

then comments on the content of


2/21

a "private" feel, students feel free

to experiment. Mistakes don't

matter.

will naturally want to be accurate,

so the teacher stands by to give

language advice.

the reports.

Learners may now hear a recording of others doing a similar task and compare how they all did it. Or they may read a

text similar in some way to the one they have written themselves, or related in topic to the task they have done.

LANGUAGE FOCUS

ANALYSIS

Students examine and then discuss specific features

of the text or transcript of the recording. They can

enter new words, phrases and patterns in vocabulary

books.

PRACTICE

Teacher conducts practice of new words, phrases,

and patterns occurring in the data, either during or

after the Analysis.

Sometime after completing this sequence, learners may benefit from doing a similar task with a different partner.

Conditions for Learning

Learners get exposureat the pre-task stage, and a chance to recall things they know. The task cycle gives

them speaking and writing exposure with opportunities for students to learn from each other.

The task cycle also gives students opportunities to usewhatever language they have, both in private (wheremistakes, hesitations, and approximate renderings do not matter so long as the meaning is clear) and in

public (where there is a built-in desire to strive for accuracy of form and meaning, so as not to lose face).

Motivation (short term) is provided mainly by the need to achieve the objectives of the task and to report

back on it. Success in doing this can increase longer term motivation. Motivation to listen to fluent speakers

doing the task is strong too, because in attempting the task, learners will notice gaps in their own language,

and will listen carefully to hear how fluent speakers express themselves.

A focus on formis beneficial in two phases in the framework. The planning stage between the private task

and the public report promotes close attention to language form. As learners strive for accuracy, they try to

organise their reports clearly and check words and patterns they are not sure of. In the final component,language analysis activities also provide a focus on form through consciousness-raising processes. Learners


3/21

notice and reflect on language features, recycle the task language, go back over the text or recording and

investigate new items, and practise pronouncing useful phrases.

Language Analysis Activities

People have often been under the impression that task-based learning means "forget the grammar." As wehave discussed above, this would not be a wise move.

The aim of analysis activities is to encourage learners to investigate language for themselves, and to form

and test their own hypotheses about how language works. In the task-based cycle, the language data comes

from the texts or transcripts of recordings used in the task cycle, or from samples of language they have read

or heard in earlier lessons. Having already processed these texts and recordings for meaning, students will

get far more out of their study of language form.

Analysis activities can be followed by quick bursts of oral or written practice, or dictionary reference work

(see Willis & Willis, 1996 for specific ideas). Finally, students need time to note down useful words, phrases,

and patterns into a language notebook. Regular revision of these will help vocabulary acquisition.

Assessing the Risks

So what risks are there for the teacher? The pre-task stage is normally teacher-led: little risk of chaos here.

Although learners are free to interact in pairs and groups in the task cycle, there is a firm agenda for them to

follow, such as the achievement of the task goal. A (shortish) time limit for each phase helps, too. The

pressure from the prospect of reporting in public ensures learner engagement at the interim planning stage.

At the beginning and end of each phase, the teacher assumes full control.

The language focus component does need careful preparation: Whatever analysis activity is set needs to be

done by the teacher beforehand to iron out problems. More examples can then be found in dictionaries or

grammar books. Sometimes teachers worry that they may not know the answers to incidental language

queries that learners have--there are always some! But learners can be encouraged to explore these further

on their own, or in pairs, or together with the teacher, with the help of dictionaries, computer databases, or

concordance lines, and then report on them in the next lesson.

Designing Tasks to Promote Language Use

Any topic or theme can give rise to different types of tasks, which can be generated with the help of the

typology shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Typology for TBL Task Design

ORDERING, SORTING, CLASSIFYING

LISTING COMPARING, MATCHING


4/21

YOUR TOPIC

e.g., cats

PROBLEM SOLVING CREATIVE TASKS, PROJECT WORK

SHARING PERSONAL EXPERIENCES,

ANECDOTE TELLING

Each type involves different cognitive processes. The top three types increase in cognitive complexity from

left to right, but are generally cognitively less challenging than the three at the bottom. These may involve

more complex cognitive operations or combinations of simpler task types.

For example, taking the topic "cats," a listingtask might be: List three reasons why people think cats make

good pets. Acomparingtask might be to compare cats and dogs as pets. A problem-solvingtask could be to

think of three low budget solutions to the problem of looking after a cat when the family is absent.

An experience sharingor anecdote tellingtask could involve sharing stories about cats.

It is always a good idea to record two or three pairs of fluent speakers doing (and reporting) the tasks, so that

you can choose the best recording, transcribe it, and use it in class to illustrate features of spontaneous and

planned language. Working with real data is exciting; there are always discoveries to be made, and here therisk is reduced by having time to prepare for what crops up in the recording.

Conclusions

TBL offers a change from the grammar practice routines through which many learners have previously failed

to learn to communicate. It encourages learners to experiment with whatever English they can recall, to try

things out without fear of failure and public correction, and to take active control of their own learning, both

in and outside class.

For the teacher, the framework offers security and control. While it may be true that TBL is an adventure, itcan be undertaken within the safety of an imaginatively designed playground.

References and Further Reading

For more on how people learn languages (in and out of classrooms):

Ellis, R. (1997). Second language acquisition.Oxford: Oxford University Press.


5/21

Williams, J. (1995). Focus on form in communicative language teaching: Research Findings and the classroom

teacher.TESOL Journal, 4(4),12-16.

For more on applying a TBL approach, designing tasks, making recordings, and dealing with typical problem

situations:

Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning.Harlow,U.K.: Longman Addison- Wesley.

For a fuller paper on the TBL framework, more on consciousness-raising activities, and many examples of

teacher innovations:

A Holistic Approach to Task-Based Course Design

Jane Willis

Aston University, UK

After outlining three basic principles relating to language learning, I then describe and illustrate a holistic

process of course and materials design which takes these principles into account.

1 Three principles for materials designers

Principle 1: Language is a meaning system.

Halliday (1973) emphasises that learning a second language involves the acquisition of a new system forrealizing familiar meanings. In natural SLA circumstances, we begin by wanting to mean, (and understand what

others mean) and then go on to seek or notice wordings that express those meanings. Language does not exist

in a vacuum, and it does not develop in a vacuum. This is why in classroom circumstances lists of words andsample patterns taught as single items very rarely become part of the learners' deployable system. Languagedevelops in response to the need to mean and to understand what others mean (Halliday, 1973; Willis & Willis,forthcoming). It follows that materials we offer learners should allow them to focus first on meanings in

contexts and then go on to look at the wordings that realize the meanings.

From this, we can argue that any pedagogical process which supports natural acquisitional processes shouldtherefore lead from meaningsto wordings.

This is a major principle behind a task-based approach to course design. In setting learners a task to achieve(e.g., a problem to solve), the emphasis is first on learners' exchanging meanings to complete the task, usingwhatever language they can recall. Then they examine the language that fluent speakers or writers used to dothe same task and focus on typical words, phrases and patterns (i.e., wordings) that occurred (Willis, 1996b,

1998a, 1999).

Principle 2. Exposure to the target language in use is vital.

To acquire a new language system, learners need exposure to the kinds of language that they will need(Krashen, 1987). It follows, then, that whatever learners hear and read as part of their course needs to reflect,as far as is possible, the typical features of the language of the learners' target discourse communities.

For example, if learners need to understand spontaneous informal interaction in English, they must be exposed

to typical samples of spontaneous talk. If learners of business English need to be able to respond to letters ofcomplaint, they need to have read and studied the language of typical responses to letters of complaint.

If learners don't know why they are learning English, they need exposure to a broad and varied selection ofmaterials that will encourage them to go on using their English and learning outside class on their own and togain a solid foundation they can build on, once they discover what their language needs will be.

In all cases, the choice of language data, both recordings of spoken language and written texts, is of vitalpedagogical importance. Course designers should aim to choose a representative set of target text types from

accessible real life sources-samples that reflect the typical language features of genres from the learners'


6/21

present or future discourse communities. This is a major principle behind corpus-based approaches to language

syllabus design and data-driven learning.

Principle 3. Some focus on language form is desirable.

Although many people acquire a new language with no formal tuition (through exposure to the target language

and opportunities to use it to express their own meanings, there is now some evidence that learners do betterif, at some point, their attention is drawn to typical features of language form (Skehan, 1994). This can be donein two ways:

Through consciousness-raising exercises highlighting frequently used language items, to help learnersperceive patterns (Long, 1988; Schmidt, 1990), and systematize what they know.

By challenging learners to communicate in circumstances where accuracy matters (e.g. making a publicpresentation of their ideas or findings), so they feel the need, at a prior planning stage, to organizetheir ideas clearly and to check that their lexical choices, their grammar and pronunciation are

accurate. (A similar need for a prestige variety was identified in research by Labov, 1970.) The cycle of

Task -> Planning -> Report, which forms the central part of a TBL framework, caters to this (Willis,1996a, 1998a).

2 From principles to practice

We have said that to acquire the target language effectively, learners need to engage actively in processing themeanings of whatever they hear and read. A variety of communication tasks can be designed which will

motivate and give learners a purpose for doing this. These tasks should also give learners practice in the skillsthey will need, for example, reading a text quickly to extract specific information, taking part in spontaneousspoken interaction, or giving planned oral or written presentations. Subsequent exercises can then be devisedwhich draw attention to the language of the texts and recordings, to the words, phrases, and patterns typical ofthat genre or topic.

Thus, materials designers have three distinct responsibilities: (a) providing appropriate language data for the

course, (b) designing meaning-focused communication tasks arising out of those data that engage learners inmeaning and that encourage genuine use of language, (c) designing form-focused language study exercisesthat raise learners' awareness of typical and useful formal features of language.

3 A holistic approach

3.1 Initial stages: gathering a pedagogical corpus

A holistic approach to course and materials design means that you begin by assembling a set of language dataon topics of interest to your learners: e.g., written texts and recorded spoken extracts, roughly sufficient to

form the basis for your course. This forms the raw material for yourpedagogic corpus(Willis & Willis, 1996:67),which may later be refined. You then organize and sequence this material into pedagogical units, keeping notesof any gaps or imbalance of material.

The next step is to analyze this provisional corpus to identify language features that your learners would benefit

from studying, and to check coverage of other useful features.

This process so far can be summarized thus:

Figure 1

Assemble

language

data

-> sequence -> analyse -

>

Identify useful

(texts + language features,

recordings),

check coverage

Examples for three different courses follow.


7/21

For a general course, the pedagogic corpus might consist of authentic written texts on suitable topics from a

variety of sources and recordings of natural speech--both planned talk and spontaneous interaction--withtranscriptions. Sources of written data could include text books, resource books, magazines or newspapers and

for spoken data, extracts from the BBC World Service (with permission), recordings of interviews, orcommunication tasks on specified topics carried out by fluent speakers of the target language.

For an ESP course for medical students, you might use extracts from introductory medical texts books, from

popular WWW sites, for example medical notice boards, from popular magazines which have a doctor's advicecolumn, or extracts from radio programs with medical themes. In Japan, you might interview doctors whocommonly treat the expatriate community, with a view to obtaining a series of two-minute interviews, each

covering a different medical topic. For more advanced students, you might use academic research articles,specialist medical journals, and recordings of mini-lectures.

In addition to appropriate story books and other texts written for children, your data for a Young Learnerscourse could include transcripts of typical primary school activities, such as children at play in English and

stories told to audiences of children.

Whether your course is ESP, EAP, or of a more general nature, you would obviously need to take into accountlength, complexity, and conceptual and cultural accessibility of the text or recording.

At the end of this initial design process, it is important to check that you have a good variety of text types and

interactions and to identify any gaps. For example, you might find you have sufficient written texts but too fewspontaneous spoken interactions with transcripts. The next step is to refine this corpus.

3.2 Task design and making recordings

For each topic or text, you can design tasks that your learners would find engaging to do themselves and thatwould generate the type of interaction they may need to take part in. Vary the types of task to offer different

degrees of cognitive challenge. Tasks can engage learners in listing, classifying, matching, comparing, problem-solving, sharing experiences, and anecdote telling. Some can have more creative goals, such as writing a storyor designing a brochure (see Willis, 1996a: 149-154; Willis, 1999).

Task instructions can then be adapted to provide opportunities for practice of the different skills your learnersneed: e.g., beginning with spontaneous exploratory interaction or writing individual notes or reading a textprior to doing the task, and then planning an oral (or written) public presentation of the task outcome. Different

interaction patterns can be stimulated by having learners work as a team (with or without individual roles), inpairs, or as individuals.

Make recordings of fluent speakers doing these tasks (set a time limit of 1, 2 or 3 minutes) and transcribe thetasks that worked well (see Willis, 1996a: 87-98 for advice). You could also record short interviews with fluentspeakers on one aspect of the topic of the unit.

The transcriptions of the tasks and interviews can then be added to the pedagogic corpus, to increase the

amount of spoken data available for the course and to facilitate the study of typical features of spontaneousinteraction. You should by now have a well balanced collection of texts and transcripts: Your pedagogic corpus

is now ready for the next stage of course design.

3.3 Organizing the material

You will now need to sequence these raw materials into suitable pedagogical units, taking into account localconstraints such as length of course and learners' willingness to read, prepare, or write up outside class hours.For example, each unit might contain one or two texts and recordings on a common theme.

Each unit will also need language-focused activities to follow the task cycles. But before these can be produced,

it is better to gain an overall picture of the linguistic content of your pedagogic corpus, so that you can shareout linguistic features in a balanced way among units, with free space in some units for recycling.

3.4 Two tips

At this stage, keep back a few parallel texts and task or interview transcripts to use for class tests. Learners can often help in the design process by suggesting topics, supplying texts, recording

interviews, and identifying skills they may need.

4 Preparation of language-focused activities


8/21

4.1 Identifying useful language features

The next step is to carry out a liguistic analysis of the pedagogic corpus, to identify the most frequent andtypical language features which will be of most use to your learners.

There are two ways of doing this-either by computer or by hand.

If all your texts and transcripts can be typed or scanned into a computer, and if you have some concordance

software (listed in references), you will be able to get a list of words in frequency order and a list of the top Xnumber of words in alphabetical order; you can also call up concordances of key words sorted alphabetically tothe right and to the left, which will enable you to identify frequently-occurring word combinations-i.e., lexicalchunks. For more ideas on this, see Tribble & Jones (1990) or Barnbrook (1996).

A program like Wordsmith Tools, created by Mike Scott (University of Liver pool, OUP) will give you (and yourlearners) the chance to build lists of the most common 2-, 3-, or 4-word (or more) chunks. Notice in which

texts and in which units these occur. It may be that your data will yield enough examples to allow you to focuson common time phrases or phrases of location or quantity in early units, as these are naturally so plentiful.

Some phrases are topic-specific and can be highlighted together. Interactional phrases, e.g., Know what Imean? and vague language chunks, e.g., and that kind of thingare ubiquitous; they could be collected from

early units and focused on in a later unit where several of them occur together in the spoken data.

With no computer, you can do a simple text-by-text analysis by hand, using published frequency lists to helpyou identify common words and notice useful collocations, chunks, and patterns that occur with them. Willis(1996a: 171-172) gives lists of the top 200 words (spoken and written separately).

You can also look out for patterns in discourse and how these are signaled and different ways of expressingparticular meanings, notions and functions. These are only identifiable by hand.

The linguistic features thus identified can become the focus of language study exercises and shared out among

the units.

4.2 Designing language study materials

This is the final stage in TBL course design. Language study exercises will be based largely on examples

occurring in the data, occasionally supplemented with dictionary examples. Materials can range from traditionalpractice exercises to learner-centered, consciousness-raising activities which involve different kinds ofoperations, including identifying patterns or usages classifying hypothesis building and checking, cross-language exploration, deconstruction and reconstruction of text, recall, and reference activities (Willis & Willis,

1996: 63-76).

5 Summary and example

We can now add to our first figure to show the process in more detail.

As an example of this process, let us take the topic of Conversation And Cultural Normsfor learners who wantconversational English.

Text selection: for an advanced class, a short extract from a book giving advice to business people socialising

with their Japanese counterparts for the first time.

For a lower level class, a recorded anecdote about how a British couple in England felt very embarrassed when

an eminent Japanese professor, on arrival at their house for dinner, asked them how much they had paid fortheir house.

Figure 2


9/21

Selection of topics.

Assemble texts &

recorded data, check

coverage, identify

gaps.

Design tasks.Supplement with

recordings of tasks &

interviews.

Final selection of data.

-> sequence into units -> analyse-

>

Identify useful language

features, allot to units,

design language focus

activities.

We needed some spontaneous interaction, so we planned a two-minute task: "What don't you talk about in

your culture? Make a list of things you would avoid asking about and say why." We recorded two British peopledoing this and transcribed the first half of their discussion.

To provide a written text parallel to the spoken interaction, we asked a fluent English-speaking Japanesewoman to write some advice for visitors to Japan--in response to the same task instructions.

We sequenced these within the unit, using the spoken anecdote at pre-task stage to introduce the topic. Thelearners would then do the task themselves in pairs and report their list and reasons to the whole class.

As a second task, they would read the written advice and compare this with the content of their own lists. Forhomework, they could be encouraged to revise their lists and reasons, and record themselves giving advice asif to an English person.

So far, the emphasis has been primarily on exchanging meanings. There is also a focus on accuracy, whicharises naturally when learners are asked to report their list to the whole class and later, when recording their

advice, as both these lead up to public "performances."

A more specific focus on form is introduced in the subsequent Language Focus activities. The instructions forone activity were:

Identify, from the transcript and the written text, two or three ways of introducing advice on culturalmatters.

The examples in the spoken transcript were:

"You don't normally go and ask people personal questions, do you?""Like, I wouldn't ask you how much you paid for your sweater or what have you."

"The other day somebody said that English people don't like talking about religion, money, sex, . . . er . . .politics--what was the other one?"

The teacher here could point out that when giving advice, reporting what other people have said or done in thepast is very typical in social interaction in Britain. Written examples included

"Avoid talkingabout politics and religion.""Avoid startingdiscussions or arguments.""It's rude tocut into someone's talk. If you have to interrupt someone, it's better tostart by saying something

like 'I'm sorry to interrupt but . . ."'

The teacher here could point out these patterns and ask learners to find more examples of each. Other

consciousness-raising activities could include the following:

Find, in the spoken transcript, eight phrases containing the word Iand try to classify them according totheir function in the interaction.

Find seven phrases containing words ending in -Iy. Write down any five phrases but miss out the -Iy words. See if your partner can read your phrases out loud putting back the right -lyword.

E.g., That's funny because the other day... (the word actuallyis missing).


10/21

Find, in the written text, phrases with one verb followed by another verb in +ing, e.g., ..it's bettertostoptalking.Can you find in the text five different verbs which come before a verb ending in -ing?Can you think of two more?

These activities illustrate three of the consciousness raising activity types listed in 4.2 above. Can you identify

which? (This is a classifying task!)

7 Conclusion

Some approaches to materials design begin with lists of specific language forms and skills, and then try to find(or concoct) texts and tasks which illustrate their use. These I would call additivein approach, as they leadfrom wordings to meanings.

This paper has described a holisticcourse design process which begins with whole texts and activities thatinvolve processing meanings in contexts, and which then leads on to a focus on wordings and form.

Basing materials on a well-selected pedagogic corpus means that recycling of common and typical language

features will happen naturally inside the classroom, and that learners will be far better prepared for whateverEnglish they meet and need to use outside the classroom.

References

Barnbrook, G. (1996). Language and computers: A practical introduction to a computational analysis oflanguage.Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.

Halliday, M. (1975). Learning how to mean.. London: Edward Arnold.

Krashen, S. D. (1985). Principles and practice in second language acquisition.. Oxford: Pergamon.

Labov, W. (1970). The study of language in its social context. In P. Giglioli (Ed.), Language and social context.Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Long, M. (1988). Instructed interlanguage development. In L. Beebe (Ed.), Issues in second languageacquisition:Multiple perspectives. Rowley, Mass: Newbury House.

Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning.Applied Linguistics 11, 2 (129-158).

Scott, M. (1998). Wordsmith tools (concordance software) available only through OUP's Internetsite:http://www.oup.co.uk/elt

Skehan, P. (1994). Interlanguage development and task-based learning. In M. Bygate, A. Tonkyn, & E. Williams(Eds.), Grammar and the language teacher(pp.175-199). Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall.

Tribble, C. & Jones, G. (1990). Concordancing in the Classroom.Harlow: Longman.

Willis, D. & Willis, J. (forthcoming). Six propositions in search of a methodology: Applying linguistics to task-

based learning. In I. de la Cruz, C. Santamaria, C. Tejedor, C. Valero (Eds.), Estudios de linguistica aplicada a

finales de siglo. Alcala: Universidad de Alcala.

Willis, J. (1996a).A framework for task-based learning. Harlow: Longman.

Willis, J. (1996b). Consciousness-raising activities in the language classroom. In J. Willis & D. Willis

(Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching. Oxford: Heinemann ELT.

Willis, J. (1997). Exploring spoken language: Analysis activities for trainers and trainees. In I. McGrath(Ed.), Learning to train.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall International.

Willis, J. (1998a). Task-based learning--What kind of adventure?" The Language Teacher 22, 7 (17-18).

Willis, J. (1998b). Concordancing in the classroom without a computer. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materialsdevelopment in second language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Willis, J. (1999). Designing and using tasks to promote optimum language development. In A. Barfield, R.

Betts, J. Cunningham, N. Dunn, H. Katsura, K. Kobayashi, N. Padden, N. Parry, & M. Watanabe (Eds.),Focus on
http://www.oup.co.uk/elthttp://www.oup.co.uk/elthttp://www.oup.co.uk/elthttp://www.oup.co.uk/elt


11/21

the classroom: Interpretations. Proceedings of the 24th JALT international conference(pp. 119-126). Tokyo:

The Japan Association for Language Teaching.

Willis, J. & Willis, D. (Eds.). (1996). Challenge and change in language teaching. Oxford: Heinemann ELT.

From Bluepnnt to Edifice

An Architectural Approach to Cumculum and Materials Design

Steven Gershon

Obirin University

Approaching the construction process

In the construction of an edifice--a large, split-level home, say--plans are drawn, the frame is assembled, thestructure is built, the interior is decorated and the rooms are furnished. Many stakeholders give input and,ideally, collaborate toward a common vision. Architects, zoning officials, builders, electricians, plumbers,interior designers and occupants are all involved in the collaborative process. During each phase of the work,

their decisions reflect an interplay of their aesthetic preferences, practical needs, physical resources, andexternal constraints. After that, regular maintenance and occasional large-scale remodeling is undertaken. Theresult is a fluid, sometimes spontaneous, often circular, process of decision-making, problem solving,negotiation, and compromise.

The edifice of a university-based coordinated language program similarly undergoes a kind of interactiveconstruction process. The organizational goals, curriculum, content, materials, and mechanisms for

maintenance inevitably reflect the interaction--at times smooth, at times not-- of various philosophical tensions,

pedagogical dichotomies, institutional pressures, and practical constraints. (For a discussion of the manystakeholders involved in a university-based language program, see Lindsay, 1997.) The result, as for our homeabove, is a fluid, sometimes spontaneous, often circular, process of decision making, problem solving,negotiation, and, inevitably, compromise.

This article examines some of the competing issues that influence the builders of a language program to adopt

certain perspectives over others in constructing the curriculum and materials. To illustrate the issues involved,examples are drawn from the Obirin University English Language Program (OUELP). Though it's certainly notthe only "Model home" on the market, the Obirin program has proven itself to be a structurally sturdy abodecontaining well-appointed, coordinated "rooms" of core and elective courses to accommodate the 35 teachersand 1000 students who occupy them at any one time. More importantly, it has for a number of years reliedprimarily on its own in-house materials-writing "interior designers" to furnish and continuously refurbish its core

rooms. The "interior designing" is not only the most time-consuming element of a program's management, butalso, ultimately, the most visible manifestation of its distinctiveness.

Drawing the blueprints ---> Needs: EGP, EAP, GEAC

A large, multi-room home is designed for the needs of its future occupants. Since the builders may not knowprecisely who the future occupants will be or what they will need, however, they design a structure that canaccommodate a variety of occupants over time.

A language program may incline its course offerings toward either English for General Purposes or English for

Specific Purposes (EGP or ESP), or any of ESP's similarly abbreviated branches, such as EOP, EAP, EGAP, orESAP--English for Occupational Purposes, English for Academic Purposes, English for General AcademicPurposes, or English for Specific Academic Purposes aordan, 1997). The starting point for a university languageprogram's curriculum and materials planning is an assessment of student needs.

The problem, of course, is determining those students' needs. Far from the narrowly identifiable needs of a

homogenous group of airline pilots or nurses, unfortunately, university students' needs are often either broadlyvaried or essentially undefined. Many, in fact, are the proverbial TENOR students--Taking English for NoObvious Reason. A large program must attempt to accommodate them all.

To reflect this "open house" approach, the OUELP targets a fairly inclusive set of program goals, whichincorporate


12/21

proficiency goals (extending language skills) cognitive goals (understanding relevant cultural knowledge) affective goals (achieving a sense of self-esteem and empowerment) transfer goals (mastering generic learning skills for further study).

In the context of changing student population and this eclectic mix of design goals, we have seen the need toposition the program midway between EGP and EAP. Perhaps the more embracing acronym GEAC, GeneralEnglish in an Academic Context, most aptly describes the OUELP's set of working blueprints--- plans that arerealized both in the structural framework (curriculum) and the interior (materials) design.

Building the framework ---> Integrated skills

The foundation is prepared and the framework is put in place. The blueprints call for a split-level design. On the

first floor is a large central multi-purpose living space for all. Along the hallway are smaller rooms set aside forvarious uses. The second floor shares the same floor plan, with a multi-purpose living room and separatesmaller rooms down the hallway. Just as student needs determine the functional focus of English (General orAcademic) adopted by a program, they also affect the structural framework within which the curriculum and

materials reside. EAP courses often revolve around a common core of study skills divided into receptive andproductive skills Uordan, 1997). English programs in Japanese universities often segregate the written and oralskills, offering a collection of skill-based coursesseparate rooms, each opening on the hallway, but noneopening directly on another.

There are good reasons, logistical and pedagogical, for structuring a program upon a discrete-skill framework,with each of the language skills timetabled to a specific lesson. Likewise, a program may, for practical or

philosophical reasons, integrate the skills, allowing the various language skills to flow through a course in anorder dictated by the content. As well as offering the teacher the advantages of flexibility, an integrated

approach offers the students variety, interest and, arguably, a more natural, authentic framework for the studyof any content area (Brinton et al., 1989).

The OUELP framework, with its GEAC blueprint, supports both integrated skills and discrete skill areas. Theintegrated-skills first-year and second-year "multipurpose rooms" form the structural center of each floor, with

students spending more of their time in this "core" area. The separate-skill elective course "studios" down thehallway provide students both the space and the opportunity to use other areas of the "house" to their ownadvantage.

The decision to erect an integrated-skills framework for its core courses has also led the OUELP naturally to acontent focus. Although "content-based" methodology often implies extensive use of authentic materials(Brinton 1989), the program's GEAC bias has led it to adopt a "soft" version, with some authentic material and

some adapted or simplified. Rather than attempting to produce subject-specific content for each department,

the core courses offer a mix of vocabulary-rich materials appropriate for a range of student interests andgeneral academic needs.

Designing the interior ---> Do-It-Yourself materials

With the framework and structure in place, electricity and plumbing are installed. It's then time to consider the

interior design scheme. It's a big job and one must consider whether to tackle it oneself, as a major Do-It-Yourself (DIY) project, or to bring in interior design professionals. Why would the planners of a program choose

to design its materials "in-house" over the far easier course of adopting commercially published material?Swales (1980) suggests two varieties of reasons: (a) The existing published textbooks are lacking in some way,either in designated level, cultural appropriacy, or match-up with program goals; (b) language teachingprofessionals' hubris or self-imposed need for status demands rejecting off-the-shelf books in favor of material

displaying their own homegrown expertise. We may also add an equally relevant third reason: the market-driven demands on the institution to promote a "designer-label" course to attract more applicants. As Nunan

(1998) points out, the teaching materials are "the tangible manifestation of the curriculum in action." Just asit's the interior design that gives a room its distinctiveness and usefulness, it's generally the materials thatprovide a language program's most direct effect on the students' learning.

Whatever the reasons for choosing DIY materials, once that decision is made at the program level, the in-house

interior design team has committed itself to a very time-consuming, labor-intensive undertaking. Decisions at

each level affect those of each level below, from syllabus down to unit, lesson and activity.

Decorating the space ---> Theme selection


13/21

Floor plans are rendered and the rooms, fitted with carpets, wallpaper, and curtains, take on distinctive styles

in keeping with their intended uses.

For an integrated-skills content-based syllabus such as that of the OUELP core course, a useful organizing unitis the theme. Within each theme, the topics themselves can then be allowed to dictate a variety of language

input and tasks (Brinton et al., 1989). However, questions of scope and sequence must follow: What criteriashould guide the selection of themes? What principles should guide the order of themes?

In the OUELP we opt for first-year themes such as People, Education, Countries, and Global Issues. In thesecond year they are Film Culture, The Sixties, Youth Culture,and The Information Age. Within this selection,the order is guided by a loose, though consciously built-in, conceptual and linguistic grading. In the first year,the earlier themes focus on personal experience and the physical world around the students, and have a

relatively low conceptual load, then progress toward more abstract and issues-based materials which requiremore linguistically-challenging responses. In this way, the students move to "higher-levels of languageprocessing (e.g., comparison, distinguishing fact from opinion) through the variety of text types, formats, and

activities to which they are exposed" (Brinton et al., 1989, p. 15), sharpening both their linguistic and cognitiveprocesses.

Furnishing the rooms ---> Theme organization

With the floor, walls, and windows appropriately covered, one begins to visualize the central living space fully

furnished. In deciding what will go where, maintaining a sense of unity and practicality become crucial issueswhich demand attention.

With appropriate themes in place, the question arises as to what principles will guide each theme's constructionand organization. One considers theme length, the balance of skills, the flow of material, the internal cohesion

of the material within the unit, and the desired balance of built-in consistency and variety.

Balance of skills: Maintaining an appropriate balance of skills within a theme demands vigilance, particularlywithin an integrated-skills framework. How much classroom time spent on a theme will be devoted to oralskills, to writing and reading? Should the tasks in a theme be sequenced from the least to the most

challenging? Should the unit template incorporate a pre-determined mix of fluency and accuracy tasks? Howvaried or uniform should the theme's activities be in terms of pace and mode of interaction (group, pair,individual)? These are all decisions dependent on a program's goals and the pedagogical leanings of its

materials design team.

Theme cohesion: Equally significant is the question of how much internal cohesion a theme should have. Interms of language processing, vocabulary, and content load, to what extent are the activities arranged so as tobuild on each other?

At one extreme, the activities may relate to one another in such a way that, to complete a given task, thestudents must have successfully completed the preceding ones, forming a kind of task dependency or task

chain.The advantages of a unit that is cohesive in this way is that the students retain a sense of direction,being able to clearly see their competencies being built up along the way. However, one obvious disadvantage

is that it is generally necessary to do the activities in the fixed order that they appear. More problematic is thata student having trouble with one activity may become further and further lost as the theme proceeds throughmore challenging activities.

An alternative approach might be called the activity bank model.Here the activities are independent and

autonomous; each one can stand alone and be taken on its own terms, without assuming the content,vocabulary or grammatical structures of the previous activity. Though the disadvantage of this taskindependence may be a lack of clear direction through a unit, the great advantage is flexibility. One can skiparound the activities in a theme more easily, altering the order to better suit the needs and interests of thelearners. Perhaps a more significant advantage is that the students are offered a fresh start each time they face

a new activityan important consideration with mixed-level classes. It may also be a good model for highlycoordinated programs in which classes proceed through the same material at equal speed, as it is one way togive teachers a degree of latitude to follow their own instincts and interests, if not in the material's content,

then at least in its order.

In fact, one rarely sees a multiple-lesson unit in which the activities are either wholly chained or whollyautonomous. This is certainly true of the OUELP core course: A three-week, multi-lesson unit on the theme

ofCountries, for example, will feature chained activities, offering a clear, logical flow, and stand-alone activitiesas well.

Assembling the furniture ---> Activity construction


14/21

Pieces of furniture are assembled and arranged to fit in with the overall interior style. In considering the design

features of each piece, attractiveness is weighed against purpose, simplicity, functionality, and sturdiness.

Just as each piece of furniture in a well-appointed room serves a purpose and fits in with the general interiorscheme, each activity in a unit benefits from certain design features that give it both aesthetic and functional

value. In keeping with these principles, the materials designers then craft their tasks. In the OUELP, the designteam aims for tasks which display the features of transparency, do-ability, surrender value, and robustness.

Transparency: The task type, whether dialogue, information-gap, role-play, or vocabulary exercise, should havean intended outcome that is transparent. Both the learners and the teacher need to know why they are doingthe activity and where it is leading. In OUELP materials, this often means stating on the page the objectives forthe activity. Transparency also guides the rubric, heading the activity toward concise, bulleted instructions,

clear contexts, as in role-plays, and explicit, numbered procedural steps for longer, more complex tasks.

Do-ability:All of these concerns make an activity more doable for the students. More importantly though, is theassurance that they will have the necessary language to complete the task as requiredin English. This can only

happen when the designers build into the task the language support the students will need, both for the topicand for the necessary task language to negotiate meanings, spellings, requests for repetition, turn-taking, andgroup-formation.

Surrender value: Do-ability also involves logistical simplicity, especially in relation to the surrender value of an

activity, i.e. the functional skills the learner will acquire from an activity in relation to the time it takes. In otherwords, does it produce enough solid language practice to make it worth the time and energy involved? Buildinginto the core activities a variety of interactive groupings is essential. However, our in-house designers are alsoencouraged to anticipate realistically both the time investment and the possible logistical complications that

may affect the surrender value of an activity.

Robustness:Just as a shoddy or flimsy piece of furniture will before long fall apart or be left unused, an activitywithout a certain well-proportioned robustness will soon leave students uninterested and demotivated. Thisrobust quality comes from various features the design team builds into the activity's structure. A well-conceived

pre-task lead-in, for example, serves the dual purpose of introducing necessary vocabulary and pricking thestudents' interest and expectations. To this end, quizzes, interviews, and surveys feature prominently in OUELP

materials. Likewise, task follow-ups prompting personalization of the topic afford the students a real sense ofcompletion. Accountability for information gained about a topic or a partner in the form of reporting back alsoputs students in the authentic position of being able to relay their findings to an interested group. Whatever the

task, its strength, then, comes from the clear sense of its being a well-proportioned whole that allows studentsto say they know or can do something meaningful that they didn't know or couldn't do before.

Maintenance and Renovation

The house (program) has been fully occupied for some time, providing the occupants (students) an attractive,productive space for their needs. Some areas, however, have begun to show signs of wear and tear. Perhaps anadditional room (course) is needed. The new room needs furnishing. Blueprints, hammers, saws, paintbrushes,

and wallpaper come out once again. The work continues . . .

References

Brinton, D., Snow, M., Wesche, M. (1989). Content-based second language instruction.Boston: Heinle andHeinle.

Jordan, R. (1997). English for academic purposes: A guide and resource book for teachers.Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press.

Lindsay, A. (1997). Designing and riding a camel: Some questions of balance in a co-ordinated languageprogram, Obirin Review of International Studies9, 35-102.

Nunan, D. (1988). The leaner-centered curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Swales, J. (1980). ESP: The textbook problem. The ESP Journal, 1(1), 11-23.

Further Reading

Graves, K. (Ed.). (1996) Teachers as course developers.Cambridge: Cambrdge University Press.

Jolly, D & Bplitho,R. (1998). A framework for materials writing. In B Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development inlanguage teaching.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


15/21

Orr, T. (1998). ESP for Japanese universities: A guide for intelligent reform.The LanguageTeacher,22(11), 19-

31.

Swales, J. (1995). English for academic purposes. In P. Byrd (Ed.), Materials writer's guide.Boston: Heinle andHeinle.

Yalden, J. (1996). Principles of course design for language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

A Multi-Dimensional Approach

Brian Tomlinson

When reading or listening in our L1 we do not understand the meaning of an utterance or a text just by

understanding the meaning of its words. In fact we do not understand the text at all but rather our mental

representation of it. For this representation to become meaningful and memorable we need to make use of allthe resources of our mind. We need at least to:

achieve sensory and affective experience of the text; connect the text to our previous experiences of language and of life; fill in the gaps in the text to achieve our own continuity and completion; relate the text to our own interests, views and needs.

In other words we need to achieve multi-dimensional representation of the text in order for us to give itmeaning and for it to achieve a durable impression on our minds (Masuhara, 1998, 2000).

If this is true in the L1, it is even more important when listening or reading in the L2. In order to interact

effectively with the speaker or the writer (and to utilise the opportunity for language acquisition), we need notonly to decode the words but to represent them through sensory imagery, inner speech and affective responsesin our minds.

The role of multi-dimensional representation is just as important in language production. Prior to, during, andimmediately after speaking or writing, we represent mentally what we want to say publicly through a

combination of sensory images, inner speech and affective impulses. The words we then use are a means of

trying to represent to others what is in our minds.

A multi-dimensional approach aims to help learners to develop the ability to produce and process an L2 byusing their mental resources in ways similar to those they use when communicating in their L1. Doing so notonly helps learners to maximise their brain's potential for communicating in an L2 but it also maximises theirbrain's potential for learning. We seem to learn things "best when we see things as part of a recognisedpattern, when our imaginations are aroused, when we make natural associations between one idea and

another, and when the information appeals to our senses." (Berman, 1999, p. 2). In other words, using affect,mental imagery, and inner speech is not only what we do during language use but also what we do to learn.

The Principles of a Multi-Dimensional Approach

My Multi-Dimensional Approach is based on the following principles of learning and communication.

Affect is the key to understanding and to learning. An "experience with a powerful attachment to emotions or

feelings is more likely to be retained in the long-term memory" (Berman, 1999, p. 4), and so is an experience

which we have positive attitudes towards and which helps to raise our self-esteem. Such experiences are likelyto be more meaningful and more fully understood than experiences in which affect is not involved. Affectiveappeal is therefore a pre-requisite for effective communication and for durable learning to take place.

Making connections between a new experience and previous experiences is necessary both for communicationand for learning to take place. Such connections are made by firing neural paths in the brain and are stimulatedby sensory, motor, cognitive and affective associations.


16/21

Relevance is a key factor in the gaining and paying of attention and in contributing to the deep processing

which is essential for long term learning to take place. Relevance is achieved through the stimulus of affectiveresponses and the making of multiple and salient connections.

Sensory imaging plays a vital role in the creation and understanding of language use and is instrumental in the

making of connections and the achievement of relevance. During language use in the L1 we touch, smell, hearand, above all, see things in our minds. If we do not experience such images whilst learning an L2, our learning

will be impoverished and our ability to understand and produce the language will be impaired (Sadoski andPaivio, 1994; Tomlinson, 1998a).

The inner voice is used in the L1 to prepare for and to interpret outer voice communication. Developing an L2inner voice not only helps learners to understand and to make themselves understood but it helps them to

make the connections and to achieve the relevance which are crucial for learning to take place (Tomlinson,2000a, 2000b).

Paying attention to language use helps learners develop language awareness and users of a language to

achieve effect. This is particularly so if they have been engaged affectively and have managed to achieveconnection and relevance.

The Objectives of a Multi-Dimensional Approach

My Multi-Dimensional Approach aims to help learners to

make full use of their mental resources in the process of learning to use an L2. learn an L2 in both experiential and studial ways. learn an L2 by utilising the same mental processes as they use when communicating in their L1. develop the ability to make full use of multi-dimensional representation when understanding or

producing the L2.

become accurate, fluent, appropriate and effective users of the L2.Some of the Procedures of a Multi-Dimensional Approach

Engaging Affect-- The three aspects of affect (i.e. emotional involvement, positive attitudes towards thelearning experience, and self-esteem) can be engaged by

encouraging learners to remember and recount relevant emotive experiences in their lives prior to orafter participation in an activity.

encouraging learners to think about and articulate their views about a relevant issue prior to or afterparticipation in an activity.

providing reading and listening experiences which have the potential for involving the learnersemotionally. "It is emotions, not logic, that drive our attention, meaning-making and memory. Thissuggests the importance of eliciting curiosity, suspense, humour, excitement, joy and laughter. Story

telling can provide an ideal means of achieving this" (Berman, 1999, p. 2).

encouraging learners to express their views, attitudes, opinions and emotions in writing and speakingactivities.

creating an environment in which learning is a stimulating, enjoyable and successful experience (by,for example, avoiding activities which are mechanical, bland, trivial, or designed to trap, and by usingactivities which start from what the learners understand and then help them to deepen their

understanding) .

providing activities which offer an achievable challenge. catering for differing preferred learning styles by providing a varied choice of activities.

See Arnold (1999) and Tomlinson (1998c, 1999) for other suggestions.


17/21

Imaging

An "overwhelming amount of empirical evidence seems to show that imagery is a remarkably effective mediatorof cognitive performance, ranging from short-term memory to creativity." (Kaufman, 1996, p. 77). It is also ameans of stimulating and responding to affect, of connecting with prior experience, of predicting the

development of a text, of achieving mental representation and of "accessing the right side of the brain, wherecreativity, intuition, spontaneity, and even healing capacities are said to reside." (Berman, 1999:3)

Learners can be encouraged to create mental images through

imaging activities in which the teacher guides the learners to see, smell, hear or touch things in theirminds.

imaging instructions for language activities (e.g. "As you read the article try to imagine what theMaldives look like now and what they might look like if the seas continue to rise."; "Try to see yourideal house in your mind. Then describe what it looks like to your partner.").

activities which involve imaging as an initiating move (e.g. drawing what happens in a story, mimingthe actions in a story you are listening to, following a recipe, following instructions in order to play a

new game).

See Tomlinson (1998a) for other suggestions.

Using the Inner Voice

Knowledge of a language is the ability to use that language; and the primary use of language is in thought.Knowing a language is being able to think in it. Learning an outer language involves the incorporation of thatlanguage into one's inner language. (Harman, 1981, p. 38)

On many language courses learners never really develop an inner voice in the L2 because they are constantlybeing urged to produce in the outer voice, because they are rarely given the time or the incentive to think inthe L2, because many of the activities they take part in require little mental preparation or response, andbecause they often focus all their processing energy on perfecting their utterances in their outer voice.

Learners can be helped to develop an L2 inner voice by

postponing language production activities until the learners have had the opportunity to start todevelop an inner voice through comprehension activities which require mental and physical responses.

providing activities which require learners to talk to themselves before talking to others. providing activities which require learners to talk to themselves whilst listening or reading. encouraging learners to talk to themselves in the L2 for "homework."

See Tomlinson 2000a and 2000b for other suggestions.

Kinesthetic Activities-- Early stages of my Multi-Dimensional Approach use Total Physical Response (TPR) to

provide learners with meaningful experience of the language in use. The learners follow spoken instructions toperform actions, play games, mime stories, make models, make meals etc. That way they do not have to worryabout producing correct language before they are ready and they begin the process of multi-dimensionalrepresentation as they represent the instructions in their minds before trying to carry them out.

Once the learners are ready to start producing language in the L2, TPR Plus activities are introduced in which

the first phase of some lessons consists of a physical response activity, and the subsequent activities build onfrom it. Thus, a lesson might start with the miming of the first scene in a story from the teacher's reading of it.Then the learners might develop their second scene and write or act it. And finally the learners might read thestory.

See Asher 1994 and Tomlinson 1994b for other suggestions.

Connection Activities


18/21

These are simply (but usefully) activities which ask students to think of connections between a topic, theme or

text and their own direct and vicarious experience of life. They can be done as pre-, whilst- or post-reading/listening activities and can be private mental activities or pair or group discussions.

Process Activities

Instead of being given a text to read or listen to carefully in order to answer questions on it, the learners arehelped to create a version of the text themselves. Some of the procedures which can help them are:

Shouting out the next word when the teacher stops whilst reading a story. Writing the next word of a text as the teacher builds it up word by word on the board or OHP. Filling in blanks in a text by choosing from a number of acceptable alternatives. Writing a text as a dictation and then writing the next line in a group whenever the reader stops. Reading a story page by page and drawing a picture to illustrate their predictions for each next page. Miming a scene from a text as the teacher reads it and then in groups preparing and miming the nextscene.

All the activities above are designed to activate the minds of the learners and to ensure that their eventualexperience of the original text will be multi-dimensional rather than decoding focused.

Inferencing Activities -- These are activities in which learners are presented with a gap which has been left by awriter or speaker for the receiver(s) to fill in. The gap can initially be filled in through sensory imaging and inner

speech and then articulated through discussion or writing.

Awareness Activities-- These are activities in which learners are helped to experience a text through multi-dimensional representation and are then asked to discover things about how the language has been used to

achieve accuracy, appropriacy or effect. Such activities can involve investigating features of grammar,vocabulary, pragmatics, discourse, style, genre or text type. These are cognitive, studial activities but they

succeed best if they have been preceded by activities which stimulate affective, experiential responses to thetext.

See Tomlinson (1994a) for a discussion and an example of this approach.

Conclusion

A multi-dimensional approach does not need any special materials or techniques. It can be used very effectivelyby collecting a bank of potentially engaging reading and listening materials (perhaps selected from acoursebook) and then designing activities which involve multi-dimensional responses to them. The followingflexible framework has been used to develop a principled and connected series of multi-dimensional responses

to a text:

1. Readiness Activities (i.e. imaging, inner speech and connection activities aiming at activating the mindin readiness for experiencing the text).

2. Experiential Activities (i.e. experiencing the text through visualising, inner speech, affectiveassociations etc.

3. Intake Response Activities (i.e. expressing affective responses to what has been taken in from the text;sharing mental representations with other learners).

4. Development Activities (i.e. language production activities which use the text as a base -- and thus alsodeepen understanding of it).

5. Input Response Activities (i.e. interpreting the intentions of the speaker/writer).

6.

Awareness Activities (i.e. making discoveries about salient linguistic, pragmatic or stylistic features ofthe text).


19/21

For other discussions of aspects of a multi-dimensional approach see Masuhara, 2000; Tomlinson, 2000c, in

press.

References

Asher, J. (1994). The Total Physical Response: a stress free, brain compatible approach to learning. SEAL,

Autumn, 21-26.

Berman, M. (1999). The teacher and the wounded healer. IATEFL Issues. 152, 2-5.

Cornoldi, C. and Logie, R. (1996). Counterpoints in perception and mental imagery: Introduction. In C. Cornoldiet al.

Cornoldi, C, Logie, R. H., Brandimote, M. A., Kaufman, G and Reisberg, D. (1996). Stretching the Imagination:Representation and Transformation in Mental Imagery.Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Harman, G. (1981). Language learning.In N. Block (Ed.) Readings in Philosophy of Psychology. Vol. 2. London:Methuen.

Kaufman, G. (1996). The many faces of mental imagery.In C. Cornoldi et al.

Masuhara, H. (1998). Factors influencing reading difficulties of authentic materials for advanced learners of EFL.PhD Thesis. University of Luton.

Masuhara, H. (2000). Is reading difficulty a language problem? Implications of neuro-scientific research findingsfor reading pedagogy and materials development. The Language Teacher. 24(2).

Sadoski, M. and Paivio, A. (1994).A dual coding view of imagery and verbal processes in reading

comprehension.In R. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell and H. Singer (Eds.) Theoretical Models and Processes ofReading (Fourth Edition). Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association, pp. 582-601.

Tomlinson, B. (1994a). Pragmatic awareness activities.Language Awareness, 3 (3/4), 119-129.

Tomlinson, B. (1994b). TPR materials. FOLIO. 1(2), 8-10.

Tomlinson, B. (1998a). Seeing what they mean. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.) Materials development in languageteaching,pp. 265-278. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tomlinson, B. 1998b. And now for something not completely different: An approach to language through

literature. Reading in a Foreign Language, 11(2), 177-189.

Tomlinson, B. (1998c). Affect and the coursebook. IATEFL Issues 145, 20-21.

Tomlinson, B. (1999). Adding affect to ESP (English for Special People).ESP SIG Newsletter. 15, 26-34.

Tomlinson, B. 2000a. The inner voice; a critical factor in L2 learning. The Journal of the Imagination inLanguage Learning.Vol. VII.

Tomlinson, B. 2000b. Talking to learn: the role of the inner voice in L2 learning.Applied Language Learning.Special Millennium Issue.

Tomlinson, B. 2000c. Materials for cultural awareness: combining language, literature and culture in themind. The Language Teacher, 24(2).

Tomlinson, B. In press. Connecting the mind: a multi-dimensional approach to teaching language throughliterature. The English Teacher.


20/21

Helping Your Students to Listen with Bilingual TV

Bob Jones

REJ English House

QUICK GUIDE

Key Words:Video, Listening

Learner English Level: Lower Intermediate to Advanced

Learner Maturity Level: High School to Adult

Preparation Time: About an hour

Activity Time: 60 to 90 minutes

This classroom activity grew out of my own attempts to improve my Japanese listening ability. In the early days

of my Japanese studies, I found I could follow the controlled dialogues on my course book tapes and could

usually understand Japanese friends when they spoke to me directly. However, put me in a situation where I

had to listen to Japanese conversing with each other, or sit me down in front of a Japanese TV program, and I'd

be completely lost.Somewhere along the way I acquired a bilingual VCR and one day, after listening to an American movie I hadrecorded, I decided to try listening to the Japanese version. Familiarity with the content enabled me to followmuch of the dialogue and pick out a large number of utterances. From then on, this bilingual approach toJapanese listening became a regular part of my self-study program and, in time, I was able to wean myself

away from the bilingual support and begin to enjoy many mainline Japanese programs.

The benefits I experienced from using bilingual TV were something I wanted to share with my students and, in

order to introduce them to the idea, I developed the activity described below.

Preparation

1. Record a popular bilingual English TV drama on a bilingual video recorder and choose a five minutescene depicting some simple everyday activity such as a family sitting down to dinner or somebodyshopping for clothes.

2. Jot down 10 to 12 utterances from the English version of the chosen scene.3. Find the equivalent phrases in the Japanese version and jot these down too, enlisting the help of a

Japanese colleague or friend if necessary.

4. Make two columns on a sheet of A4 paper. Type the Japanese phrases in the left-hand column andleave the right-hand column blank.

5. Write each of the utterances selected from the English version on a separate card.The Activity

1. Begin the activity by briefly introducing the main characters and giving any necessary backgroundinformation.

2. Write two or three very simple comprehension questions on the board and then show the Englishversion of the scene.

3. Check the comprehension questions and elicit any further details the students may have picked up.


21/21

4. Unless the students are very advanced, they are likely to have experienced some comprehensiondifficulties. Tell them, jokingly, that you can guarantee 100% understanding on their second viewingand watch the smiles appear as you play the Japanese version.

5. After they have heard the Japanese version, give each student one English sentence card and one copyof the A4 sheet with the Japanese phrases.

6. Ask them to memorize their respective English sentences. As they do so, you should walk aroundchecking understanding and pronunciation. In mixed ability classes, you can compensate for differingabilities by discreetly giving the more complicated utterances to the stronger students and the simplerones to the weaker. In monitoring their pronunciation, you should also help them make adjustments sothat their stress and and intonation patterns correspond to those on the video.

7. When the sentences have been memorized, ask the students to walk around the room dictating theirsentences to each other. Students write the sentences they hear in the right-hand column of their A4sheets, next to the corresponding Japanese phrases.

8. When students have completed the task, check the sentences with them, deal with any language pointsarising and play them the English version once more.

Comments

I have tried this activity with several different groups ranging from post-elementary to high school Englishteachers. It was a personal delight for me to watch the smiles on students' faces as their individual sentencescame up, but more importantly, student feedback revealed a much fuller understanding of the English versionas a result of the activity described. Even more satisfying, some students have taken the idea on board andstarted using bilingual videos in their own free time with a view to improving their listening skills. Of course,using bilingual videos should not be seen as an end in itself but as a support for learners as they attempt to

bridge the wide gap between understanding course book tapes and being able to enjoy mainline English TV andfilm.

What is a Task

Documents

Transcript of What is a Task