What Do Children Want? A Conceptualization of Evolutionary Influences on Children’s Motivation in...
-
Upload
eleanore-howard -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of What Do Children Want? A Conceptualization of Evolutionary Influences on Children’s Motivation in...
What Do Children Want? A Conceptualization of Evolutionary
Influences on Children’s Motivation in
the Peer Group Kevin MacDonald International Journal of Behavioral Development 19(1) 53-73
Jennifer TraverAnn Dorlet
Luky Pongquan
A Look at Previous Research
• Peer Relationships fall within a continuum based on Resources
The Resource Continuum
•Not voluntary •Relationships are prone to defection
•Asymmetrical relationships
•Individuals rarely benefit
•Conflict of interest I.e. bullying
•Voluntary• Occur in Natural Groups
• Uneven access to Resources Among Group
• Basic Principles of Social Organization
•Voluntary Symmetrical relationships
• Based Reciprocity• Neither Party defects• Shared Resources
• I.e. Emotional Guidance
•High levels of Commonality or Interests
•Individuals choose friends who lie in this part
of the continuum
•Exploitation• Relationships of Dominance and
Subordination
• Friendships
Friendships Based on Reciprocity and Similarity Resources are being shared by both
Individuals I.e. companionship, sharing advice, valued possessions Past research by Asher and Williams found
that mostly likely friendships would occur with individuals who are similar to each other
“Reciprocity and Equality” are the Hallmarks of Friendship
How Can You Tell If Friendships will be Reciprocated?
Phenotypically I.e. if physical attractiveness is a resources
then children who are similar in physical attractiveness will more likely be friends
Interests and Abilities I.e. if individuals share the same interests
and abilities they are more likely to be friends because individuals can obtain resources from one another
Hey, You’re Just as Good
Lookin’ as me, I’ll be your
friend!
Macdonald Looked at the Evolved Systems that
Influenced the Resource Value
Social Status plays into the Resource Value
Popular Children have good assets Unpopular children come as liabilities
Popular Vs. Unpopular Popular kids have
the most positive high net value
Become leaders Set the norms Physically attractive Most of them excel
in academia and or athletic abilities
Prosocial Interaction
Unpopular kids tend to be liabilities on other peer groups
I.e. Most unpopular boys tend to be highly aggressive, hyperactive, and disruptive
Three biological systems that appear to be assets or liabilities in peer
relationships Sensation Seeking and Impulsivity
Functional system Resources include sociability, curiosity, exploration of the
environment, and creativity There traits are associated with interests in and
responsiveness to the environment This is important in the aspect of play where individuals are
honing down on learning social skills This system makes child seek contact with the environment
and at moderate levels becomes part of learning device Developmentally this declines during adulthood (i.e. decline
in risk taking and sensation, attention focuses possible sources of threat)
Biological Systems Continued Example of Sensation/Impulsivity children
are ADHD children They are highly impulsive and seek simulating
environments This children are known to be highly rejected by
other children As a result being extreme in this trait of
Sensation seeking and impulsivity is not viewed as an asset by other children so not a resource to other peers
Biological Systems Continued
Behavioral Inhibition System Functional System System that responds to behavioral threats with
behavioral inhibition Children who are dominated by this system are
withdrawn and shy leading to social neglect This is not a resource for other peers and
becomes a liability these children become less mature, less assertive and more complaint
Biological Systems Continued
Human Affectional System Non Functional System because develops out of
relationships Resources include attachment, intimate
relationships, help to shape high investment in parenting, help to form close friendships later in life (highly rewarding), empathy, nurturance, and prosocial behavior
It has no adaptive function during childhood but helps to develop pair bonding in the future so it comes as a elementary form of behavior
Biological Systems Continued
The attached child is relatively empathetic and altruistic with friendships because feelings of support, affection, commitment, and cooperation are reciprocated
Helps ensure appropriate mate choice, increase paternal investment and cement family ties
Conclusion Macdonald proposes that popular children
have high net value or asset value due to moderate levels of impulsivity, moderate levels of behavioral inhibition, and moderate levels of the human affectional system
Overinhibited children are seen as liabilities to other children and are therefore rejected
Critical ReviewsAlthough he brings up a different
perspective on how to view the resource value, he doesn’t explain the degree of impulsivity, behavioral inhibition, and the human affectional system How much is too much? Or too little?
Phenotype can be subjective