WHAT CAN WE DO FOR DC NONPROFITS? LESTER M. SALAMON [email protected].

WHAT CAN WE DO FOR DC NONPROFITS?

LESTER M. SALAMON [email protected]

A leading source of ground-breaking knowledge about the nonprofit sector, philanthropy, social investing, and the tools of government in the U.S. and around the world.

Active in 40 countries—Latin America, Africa, W. Europe,Central and Eastern Europe, Pacific Rim, C. and SE Asia

Wide range of domestic and international partners

Specialize in objective empirical and analytical work

Solid record of achievement over 20-year period

WHO WE ARE

Neither governments nor businesses can solve global challenges on their own.

Civil society organizations an invaluable renewable resource.

Not making effective enough use of this resource

Gross lack of basic information a major reason.

JHU/CCSS forging the tools that can allow us to do better!

WHAT WE BELIEVE

Build networks

Generate new knowledge

Institutionalize capabilities

Design assessment tools

Provide training

Change thinking

WHAT WE DO

OUR METAPHOR

Foursome Investments (UK)

Social Capital Partners (Canada)

Bank Intesa (Italy)

Calvert Foundation

Community Reinvestment Fund

Compagnia di San Paolo

Neighborhood Housing

Services of America

Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Social e

nterpris

e

Blended value

Gifts in Kind

Impact investing

Accion

Securitization

Acumen Fund

Cha

rity

N

avig

ator

Mission investing

Women’s Funding Network

Schwab Charitable Fund

Prosper.com

Impact P

artners

(India)

Volkswagen Fo

undation

Fidelity Charitable Gift Fund

Sea Change Capital Partners

Com

mun

ity

Wea

lth

Vent

ures

New

Pro

fit

Innovest Strategic

Value Advisors

Keystone

Guggenheim Partners

Kiva

Charitable Remainder Trust

Californ

ia Welln

ess

Foundation

Pooled Income Funds

echoDonations

Aquinas Growth Fund

Bovespa

TechSoup

Venture philanthropy

Social V

enture

Partn

ers

NESTA

Oppenheimer Legacy

Program

Don

orsChoose.org

Network for G

ood

Standard & Poor’s

PHILANTHROPY’S BIG BANG

PUTTING CIVIL SOCIETY ON THE ECONOMIC MAP OF THE WORLD

Kenya

Israel

Pakistan

Australia

Belgium

ItalySlovakia

Germany

United Kingdom

Denmark

France

Sweden

Norway

The Netherlands

Finland

Austria

Switzerland Czech Republic

Poland

Romania

Russia

HungaryUnited States

Mexico

Colombia

Brazil

Chile

Canada

UgandaArgentina

South Africa

Peru

Tanzania

Ghana Lebanon India

Thailand

New Zealand

Morocco

PortugalSpain

Ireland

Egypt

Japan

Korea

The Philippines

Turkey

BUILDING NETWORKS: CNP PROJECT COUNTRIES

INSTITUTIONALIZING CAPABILITES

NPI SHARE OF EMPLOYMENT vs. OTHER INDUSTRIES, MEXICO 2008

Arts, entertainment, & recreation

Real estate

Utilities

Finance & Insurance

Information

Professional, scientific, & technical services

Health & social assistance

Accommodation & food services

NONPROFIT INSTITUTIONS

Public administration

Administrative & waste

Education

Transportation & warehousing

Other services

Manufacturing

0.3%

0.6%

0.7%

0.7%

0.7%

1.9%

2.5%

3.6%

3.6%

5.0%

5.0%

5.2%

6.1%

7.4%

12.9%

SHARE OF TOTAL EMPLOYMENT

INSTITUTIONALIZING CAPABILITIES:MEXICO NPI SATELLITE ACCOUNT REPORT

CHANGING THINKING

Multiple possibilities for supportive activity:

1) Washington Region Nonprofit Employment Trend Reports


Greater Washington Region Nonprofit Employment Report: 2003


218,344 workers

11.2 percent of Greater Washington Region private employment

$9.6 billion in wages, > 10 percent of the total

GREATER WASHINGTON REGION NP EMPLOYMENT, 2003

163.8

Construction

68.1

Manufacturing

38.4

Transportation

9.1

Utilities

218.3

501(c)(3)Organizations

Num

ber o

f em

ploy

ees

(in th

ousa

nds)

* Industry data cover entire metro area.

335.6

Federalgovernment

EMPLOYMENT IN WASHINGTON REGION NONPROFITS vs. SELECTED INDUSTRIES*, 2003

3.4%4.2%

6.0%6.2%6.4%

8.2%8.9%

10.2%12.9%12.7%

15.5%

Loudoun, VAPrince William, VA

Prince Georges, MDFairfax, VA

Fairfax, VA (city)Frederick, MDArlington, VA

Montgomery, MDAlexandria, VA (city)

Manassas, VA (city)Falls Church, VA (city)

24.7%District of Columbia8.6%Maryland suburbs

7.0%Virginia suburbs11.4%Greater Washington

Percent of private employment

NONPROFIT SHARE OF GREATER WASHINGTONPRIVATE EMPLOYMENT, BY JURISDICTION, 2003

28.0%

32.0%

44.4%

33.2%

District of Columbia

Maryland suburbs

Virginia suburbs

Greater Washington

Percent change compared to 1995 level

GROWTH OF NONPROFIT EMPLOYMENT IN THE GREATER WASHINGTON REGION, 1995-2003

Virginia suburbs

27%

Maryland suburbs

26%


47%

DISTRIBUTION OF NONPROFIT EMPLOYMENT ACROSS THE GREATER WASHINGTON REGION, 2003

4.6%

2.8%

2.3%

4.1%3.7%

0.2%0.0%

2.4%

1995 - 2000 2000 - 2002 2002 - 2003 1995 - 2003

Aver

age

annu

al g

rowt

h ra

te

Nonprofit

For-profit

AVERAGE ANNUAL NONPROFIT VS. FOR-PROFIT JOB GROWTH IN THE GREATER WASHINGTON REGION, 1995-2003

22%20%

15%

12%10%

7%

38%

14%

5%

2%

13%11%

Hospitals Educationalservices

Membershiporganizations

Professional& technical

services

Socialassistance

Nursing &residential

care facilities

Perc

ent o

f tot

al n

onpr

ofit

empl

oym

ent

Greater Washington

United States

NONPROFIT EMPLOYMENT, BY FIELD, GREATER WASHINGTON REGION VS. THE NATION, 2003

6%

2%

13%

20%

29%

31%

5%

1%

12%

12%

12%

58%

MD & VA suburbs


Other

Arts & recreation

Professional services

Membership organizations

Education

Health & social services

Percent of nonprofit employment in area

NONPROFIT EMPLOYMENT BY FIELD, DC VS. MD AND VA SUBURBS, 2003

16.0%

10.0%

13.0%

6.2%

7.5%

Virginia suburbs

Maryland suburbs

53.8%

21.2%District of Columbia

10.2%Greater Washington

Nonprofit share of 1995 private employment

Nonprofit share of 1995-2003 private employment growth

NONPROFIT SHARE OF GREATER WASHINGTON REGION PRIVATE EMPLOYMENT GROWTH, 1995-2003

$641

$880

$793

$551$493

Socialassistance

$495

$757

$838

$519$448

Nursing homes Home health care

Education Hospitals

Aver

age

week

ly wa

ges

All privateNonprofit

*All private data are for the entire MSA.

NONPROFIT VS. AVERAGE PRIVATE WAGES*GREATER WASHINGTON REGION, 2003

254,935 workers

12.4% of Greater Washington Region private employment

Accounted for 32.4% of all private employment growth between 2003-2011

GREATER WASHINGTON REGION NP EMPLOYMENT, 2011

NONPROFIT SHARE OF GREATER WASHINGTON REGION PRIVATE EMPLOYMENT, BY JURISDICTION, 2003 vs. 2011

Loudoun, VA

Prince William, VA

Fairfax (city), VA

Fairfax, VA

Prince Georges, MD

Manasas (city), VA

Frederick, MD

Arlington, VA

Falls Church (city), VA

Montgomery, MD

Alexandria (city), VA


Maryland suburbs

Virginia suburbs

Greater Washington

3.4%

4.2%

6.4%

6.2%

6.0%

12.7%

8.1%

8.9%

15.2%

10.2%

12.9%

24.7%

8.6%

7.0%

11.4%

4.3%

4.4%

6.4%

6.7%

7.1%

9.4%

9.9%

10.1%

10.9%

12.0%

13.9%

26.0%

10.2%

7.2%

12.4%

2011 2003

Percent of private employment

NONPROFIT SHARE OF GREATER WASHINGTON REGIONPRIVATE EMPLOYMENT GROWTH, BY JURISDICTION, 2011

Greater _x000d_Washingto

n

District of _x000d_Columbia

Maryland _x000d_Suburbs

Virginia _x000d_Suburbs

32.4%

39.9%

30.5%

10.7%

Shar

e of

gro

wth,

200

3-20

11



2) Washington Region Nonprofit Economy Trend Reports

WHO WE AREWHAT CAN WE DO FOR DC NONPROFITS?

IN SEARCH OF VIRGINIA NONPROFITS

® IRS 990 AND 990PF forms

® BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QECW)

® IRS charitable giving data

® Census Bureau volunteering data

DATA SOURCES

VIRGINIA NONPROFIT FOOTPRINT

Source: Lester M. Salamon and Stephanie L. Geller, “Virginia’s Nonprofit Sector: Shaping the economic, cultural,

and social landscape” (Johns Hopkins University, 2012). Available at ccss.jhu.edu.

AVERAGE CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS PER $1000 OF INCOME, 2009

VIRGINIA United States

South Atlantic

GA NC FL

$21.03 $20.21

$22.88

$28.65

$24.96

$19.33

CONT

RIBU

TIO

NS P

ER $

1000

OF

INCO

ME

VIRGINIA



FOUNDATION ASSETS PER $1,000 OF GROSS STATE PRODUCT, 2008

VIRGINIA South Atlantic United States

$13.60

$25.70

$39.60

EXPE

NDIT

URES

PER

$10

00 G

SP

VIRGINIA






3) D.C. Nonprofit Listening Post Tracking System


Nonprofit Capital Needs vs. Success Securing Capital, by Purpose

The Johns Hopkins Listening Post Project

20% 100%80%60%40%0%

91%

80%

77%

67%

53%

52%

37%

25%

39%

26%

31%

42%

Orgs. Needing Capital

Orgs. Securing Needed Capital

Technology

Program Development

Acquisition/ Renovation of

Buildings or Land

Staff Development

StrategicPlanning

Vehicles/ Equipment

Percent of Organizations

SELECTED “SOUNDINGS”

Budget cuts/financial health

Health benefit costs

Governance and accountability

Capital needs

Workforce

Technology usage and needs




3) D.C. Nonprofit Listening Post Tracking System

4) Train D.C. Nonprofits for New Frontiers of Philanthropy


ARE DC NONPROFITS ORGANIZATION READY FOR THE NEW FRONTIERS OF PHILANTHROPY?

“…the definitive chronicle of the innovations that are infusing new life into the well-intentioned but often-staid world of philanthropy.”

~ Mario Marino, Venture Philanthropy Partners

“…a roadmap to the significant revolution underway …in the worlds of philanthropy and social investment.”

Available now at amzn.to/1qeAXp3 or oup.com.

TYPES OF ACTORSCapital

Aggregators

Enterprise Brokers

Quasi-Public Investment

Funds

Secondary Markets

Social Stock Exchanges

Corp-Originated Charitable

Funds

Capacity Builders

Conversion Foundations

Online Exchanges

Funding Collaboratives

Philanthropic Banks

Loans/ Credit Enhancements

Securitization

EquityInvestments Fixed Income Insurance

Social Impact Bonds

Social Investing & Purchasing

Grants

TYPES OF TOOLS


LESTER M. SALAMON [email protected]

Website: ccss.jhu.eduTwitter: @JHUCCSS

WHAT CAN WE DO FOR DC NONPROFITS? LESTER M. SALAMON [email protected].

Documents

Transcript of WHAT CAN WE DO FOR DC NONPROFITS? LESTER M. SALAMON [email protected].