WG2: Water Cycle - AMMA -...
Transcript of WG2: Water Cycle - AMMA -...
WG2: Water Cycle WG2 organized along: *3 nested spatial domains with scales relevant to the water cycle processes *Scaling issues
Global SSTTeleconnections
Mesoscale Convective Systems
Convective Cells
Monsoon System
Easterly waves
GG SST Variability
Global
Mesoscale
Regional
Local
YearSeasonDayHour
Major River Basins
Catchments
Vegetation
Pools Vegetation
10 4 km
10 3km
10 2km
10 1km
SOP EOP LOP
SATELLITES
OBSERVATIONS
MODELLING/
FORECASTS
Downscaling for impact studies
Scale Interactions
Water transport Trace gaz , Aerosols, etc
WG2: Water Cycle
Major objective of AMMA: To determine water budgets & their interannual variability on WA for few hundred kms and 10-day to month resolutions (Large uncertainties exist to these scales and with these resolutions)
Regional scale (>106 km²)
1) Improve components of budget
*PRECIPAMMA group: ●Summary of various products (strengths and weaknesses)●Evaluation of satellite product (concentrated on the CILSS, Sahelian zone)●Niamey Meeting (Open 9-12 Dec 2006)
*EVAPO-TRANSPIRATION: Modelling-Observation approach (A. Boone et al)Surface flux products for 2006 should be available before mid 2007 (0.5deg resolution)
*NWP Analysis for 2006: Impact of more data in assimilation; Improved Quality ?? (more soundings but moisture biases ECMWF) Need to be explored
2) Brief discussion of 2006 monsoon season and associated water cycle with available analysis product at the time of the meeting
Methods and input datasets
TRMM 3B43EPSAT-SG
TRMM 3B42RFE2.0
GPCP
CMORPHTAMSAT
TRMM 2A25KummerovFerraromethods
Goes Precipitation Index
Active microwave dataPassive microwave dataGeostationary dataRaingauges
Space Res. Coverage Time Res. Existence Strength Weakness
GPIGeos resolution 40°N - 40°S
GlobalGeos resolution 1986 to present Simple to produce Overestimation of distribution
Underestimation of high rain rates
GPCP2.5 degrees Global monthly 1979 to present Highly supervised
Global coverageClimatology
Quality over oceansspace resolution
GPCP-1dd 1 degree Global daily 1996 to present Time resolutionHighly supervised
Quality over oceans
RFE2.00.1 degree 40°N – 40°S
20°W – 60°Edaily 2001 to present Space and Time resol.
Highly supervisedQuality over oceans
2A255 kms 40°N – 40°S
Global1 instaneous RR estim/day
Dec 1997 to present
Precipitation radarSpace resolution
Time repetitively of low orbiting sat.
3B420.25 degree 40°N – 40°S
Global3 hours 1998 to present Precipitation radar
Time resolutionTime repetitively of low orbiting sat.
3B430.25 degree 40°N – 40°S
GlobalMonthly 1998 to present number of inputs Time repetitively of low
orbiting sat.Time resolution
CMORPH0.07 degree 60°N – 60°S
Global30 minutes Dec 2002 to
presentnumber of inputsSpace and time resolution
Only propagation info from Geos; Sat.PMW over land
TAMSAT
Geos resolution 28°N - 2°S 20°W - 52°E
dekade June 1996 to present
Raingauges from CILSS countriesSpace resolution
Only CCD info from Geos.SatelliteCoincidence between pixels and raingauges
EPSAT-SGGeos resolution 20°N – 5°S
25°W – 25°EGeos resolution June-sept.
2000,2004, 2005,2006
7 channels of MSGSpace and time resol.Number of inputs
Underestimation of high rain ratesExistence
intercomparison (5)
• Exemple of intercomparison: Distribution
WG2: Water CycleRegional scale (>106 km²)
Plans/priorities for next year
-Improved Water budget for 2006 year
Strong interaction with / involvement of NWP center required
-Evaluation with mesoscale budgets
Major issue: lack of people to do more work and progress more rapidly
*Request to AMMA-EU to fund a post doc ;
*Involve US-people (J. Roads activity for example)
*Involvement of African community
=>Link with GEWEX communities (GEWEX newsletter, link with B. Rossow initiative of sfc flux mapping, …)
WG2: Water Cycle
•Scales complies with both hydrologic and atmospheric model capabilities
•Scale of MCS & many surface-atmosphere interactions governing the transports of water vapor
Mesoscale (103 - 105 km²)
Preferred scale for atmosphere and surface integration
Principal activities done:
1) Fields observations: design of network (ex: sounding quadrilater) and collect data necessary for water cycle (radars, raingages, ….)
2) Case study http://www.amma-international.org/science/scientificGroups/WG2/case-study/index
*Hydrology & Atmosphere *Field observations EOP*Modeling
To compare on a same case study: •Runs with meso-scale atmospheric models (MSAM) (explicitly resolved convection)•Runs with meso-scale hydrologic models (MSHM)•Observations
A necessary challenge to tackle the questions related to meso-scale water cycle
Case study data base URL: ftp.aero.jussieu.frGROUND Sampling Provider Directory # stations Period GPS MET (P,T, RH) 1h O. Bock /data/ground/surface/PTU/ 3 01/08..30/09 Met Station (P, T, RH, SW_rad, Net_rad, Wind)
1h C. Peugeot /data/ground/surface/MET/ Djougou 01/08..30/09
SYNOP 3h L. Fleury /data/ground/surface/SYNOP/ 30 26/08..31/08
Precips M. Gosset /data/ground/surface/Benin_raingauge
38 2005
GPS IWV 1h O. Bock /data/ground/GPS/IWV/ 12 01/08..30/09 AERONET IWV 15min O. Bock /data/ground/AERONET/ 8 01/08..30/09 UWYO radiosonde O. Bock /data/radiosonde/UWYO/ 9 01/08..30/09 TEMP radiosonde L. Fleury /data/radiosonde/TEMP/ 30 26/08..31/08 SHADOZ radiosonde B. Kounouhewa /data/radiosonde/SHADOZ/ Cotonou 01/08..30/09 RS quality control (4D-Var) M. Nuret SATELLITE Sampling Provider Directory # stations Period MODIS ATML2 (*.hdf) F. Fierli /data/satellite/MODIS/ATML2/ 28/08..29/08 MODIS IWV O. Bock /data/satellite/MODIS/IWV/ 19 01/08..30/09 SSM/I IWV O. Bock Available from AMMASAT 8 01/08..30/09 SSM/I surface wind Meteosat wind vectors Meteosat UTH R. Roca MODEL Sampling Provider Directory # stations Period ECMWF oper fields (IWV, Q200/300/500/700 /850/925, Psfc, T2, TD2, uv10m/200/700/925, w500)
6h F. Guichard /data/model/analyses/ECMWF 0-40°N, -30-30°E
26/08..31/08
Arpège + Arp. Tropiques (MSLP, Pk1, Pk2, Q2m, T2m, IWV)
6h N. Asencio /data/model/analyses/GPS_localisation/
3 27/08..29/08
ALADIN IWV 6h M. Nuret /data/model/analyses/ALADIN/ 3 23/08..03/09 Assimilation reports L. Fleury / M.
Nuret
MESONH PROMES UKMOUMRun 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 Run 1 Run 2 Run 1 Run 2
Atmosp Initial ECMWF ARPEGE ARP-TRO ARPEGE ECMWF ECMWF ECMWF ECMWFSurface Initial ECMWF ARPEGE ARP-TRO ARPEGE ECMWF ECMWF MO ancillary MO ancillaryNesting No No No No No No Yes YesStart time 28/08 00h 28/08 00h 28/08 00h 27/08 00h 27/08 00h 27/08 00h 27/08 00h 28/08 00hEnd time 29/08 06h 29/08 06h 29/08 06h 29/08 06h 30/08 0h 30/08 0h 06/09 06h 06/09 06hDomain(km) 5000x3240 5000x3240 5000x3240 5000x3240 5100x3375 5100x3375 5800x4600 5800x4600Horiz resol(km) 10 10 10 10 15 15 20 20Time resol(s) 20 20 20 20 30 30 300 300DATASET
AROME BOLAM MESONH WRFRun 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 5 Run 1 to 9 Run 10 to 18
Atmosp Initial ALADIN ALADIN ARP-TROP ECMWF ARPEGE ECMWF NCEP Surface Initial ALADIN ALADIN ARP-TRO ECMWF ARPEGE ECMWF NCEP Nesting Yes Yes Yes ??? Yes Yes YesStart time 28/08 00h 29/08 00h 28/08 00h 28/08 00h 27/08 00h 27/08 00h 27/08 00hEnd time 29/08 06h 30/08 06h 329/08 06h 30/08 00h 29/08 06h 30/08 00h 30/08 00hDomain(km) 1728x1080 1728x1080 1728x1080 ??? 1728x1080 864x784 864x784Horiz resol(km) 2.5 2.5 2.5 ??? 4 4 4Time resol(s) 60 60 60 ??? 6.66 60 60
Summary table of the models & simulations
x x x x x x x x
xx
Sirba
Kori Dantiandou
Upper Oueme
Common domain for evaluation
14.5 N
8.5 N
1.5 W 3 E
Sirba
Kori Dantiandou
Upper Oueme
14.5 N
8.5 N
1.5 W 3 E
75 ( 9.375)50 ( 6.25)
40 ( 5) 30 ( 3.75)20 ( 2.5)15 ( 1.875)10 ( 1.25) 5 ( 0.625) 2 ( 0.25) 0.1
(mm) mm/day
sequence of 3-h cumul.
rainfall for 5
simulations
[12h-15h]
BOLAM LM PROMES
MESONH AROME
75 ( 9.375)50 ( 6.25)
40 ( 5) 30 ( 3.75)20 ( 2.5)15 ( 1.875)10 ( 1.25) 5 ( 0.625) 2 ( 0.25) 0.1
(mm) mm/day
sequence of 3-h cumul.
rainfall for 5
simulations
[15h-18h]
BOLAM
MESONH AROME
LM PROMES
75 ( 9.375)50 ( 6.25)
40 ( 5) 30 ( 3.75)20 ( 2.5)15 ( 1.875)10 ( 1.25) 5 ( 0.625) 2 ( 0.25) 0.1
(mm) mm/day
sequence of 3-h cumul.
rainfall for 5
simulations
[18h-21h]
BOLAM
MESONH AROME
LM PROMES
75 ( 9.375)50 ( 6.25)
40 ( 5) 30 ( 3.75)20 ( 2.5)15 ( 1.875)10 ( 1.25) 5 ( 0.625) 2 ( 0.25) 0.1
(mm) mm/day
sequence of 3-h cumul.
rainfall for 5
simulations
[21h-00h]
BOLAM
MESONH AROME
PROMESLM
75 ( 9.375)50 ( 6.25)
40 ( 5) 30 ( 3.75)20 ( 2.5)15 ( 1.875)10 ( 1.25) 5 ( 0.625) 2 ( 0.25) 0.1
(mm) mm/day
sequence of 3-h cumul.
rainfall for 5
simulations
[00h-03h]
BOLAM
MESONH AROME
PROMESLM
GR4J (Perrin et al., 2003, JH)
Bucket model, 4 parameters X1, X2, X3, X4
RainfallETo
Inputs (from obs)• Spatially averaged daily rainfall• Spatially averaged daily Eto
Simulated Runoff
outputs• Runoff at Outlet• Spatially averaged daily evapo-transpiration ~ daily LE average•« Leaks » or storage : residual
1.5 2 2.5
9
9.5
10
RainfallETo ETR
Runoff
Underground (residuals)
Zoom
Courtesy A. Zannou
Courtesy A. Zannou
WG2: Water Cycle Mesoscale (103 - 105 km²)
Plan for coming year1) To achieve 2005 case study*More analyses of surface fields from Atmosph models*Finalize hydrological runs (finer models)
Dedicated meeting proposed in Dec. 2006 (France)*Compare two approaches*Write a conclusive paper
2) To define interesting periods in 2006 from hydrological point of viewand to choose a 2006 case study (in collaboration with other AMMA activities
3) To establish a table listing all data/products (incl resolution, domain, …)relevant for water cycle studies 4) To establish rainfall maps from combination of radars, raingauges, disdromete(M. Gosset)
WG2: Water Cycle Mesoscale (103 - 105 km²)
Plan for coming year (2)5) To compute water budgeta) Budget over sounding network (Starting on southern quadrilater and 8RS/day periods)- Variational analysis Mandopas ( Protat talk) -NWP analysis ???- Variational analysis CSU (Johnson et al ?)-Other ?
b) Vertically integrated budget-GPS and analysis mixing (Bock et al)-Same than above in linking with LDAS surface flux estimation (Boone et al)-Other ?
c) Budget or terms of budget for few convective events (e.g. 14-15 August )?Detailed samples in temporal series of 1)
Cloud PBL surface flux aircraft, Budget around MCS with Dropsondes & radar, Anvilsbudget,CRM Budget, ….
S
Squall Line water budget
Observations Modelling
Evapotranspiration
= ? Undergound
Storage
Rainfall
Large scaleadvection
RS
RS
RS
Surface box
Atmosphere box
River flow
RS
Hydrological budget & Full water budget
Ouémé site : from fieldobservations, groundwatercontribution = subsurface
exfiltration
10
Exfiltration
Rainfall
Hortonian runoff
ET Seasonalsubsurface
groundwater
SaprolithSaprolithgroundwatergroundwater
Dee
pdr
aina
ge
0
20 m
River
Fracturedbedrock
Overland saturated
flow
From process to model : implementation in theTopamma model (Soudanian site)
WG2: Water CycleLocal scale (102- 103 km²) -
Oueme
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
01/04/04 28/09/04 27/03/05 23/09/05 22/03/06
dept
h (m
)
20m depth10m depth2m depth
A A saturatedsaturated layer layer seasonally appearsseasonally appears
Base Base level recovers each year whatever the yearly rainfalllevel recovers each year whatever the yearly rainfall
Slower depletion Slower depletion : : water remainswater remains longer in longer in the ground the ground ; longer ; longer availability availability for for vegetationvegetation --> source for > source for memory effects memory effects ??
Observations supporting water cycle issuesObservations supporting water cycle issues
448
450
452
454
456
458
460
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
mm/yr rain
land ET
runoffto SWB
SWB- ET
GW- ET
total ET
GW net storage
GW recharge
GW net transfer
Modelled terrestrialwater balance
1992 – 2005
Niger supersite(central part of Kori-Dantiandou basin)
~ 2000 km²
SWB = surface water bodiesGW = ground waterET = evapotranspiration
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
1992 1997
mm infiltration
écoulement
évaporation
transpiration
Simulated rainSimulated rain--seasonseasonbudget for budget for Wankama Wankama
catchmentcatchment
WG2: Water CycleLocal scale (102- 103 km²) - Niger
Effect of rainfall fields characteristics on hydrologivcal response (Model)
WG2: Water CycleLocal scale (102- 103 km²) - Niger
Activities
•To perform accurate hydrological budgets on super-sites
•To use improved local scale budget to improve and assess mesoscalemodels & water budget
•To evaluate/improve better water cycle parameterizations in using high resolution data on super-sites of AMMA field experiment.
•To use the synergy between the seven AMMA sites (3 super-sites + sites Dano, Nakambe, Volta, Dahra)
WG2: Water CycleLocal scale
Proposition to re-locate locale scale studies in WP 2.3 (processes) and 4.1.2 surface modelsLocal approaches in WG2 only for local validationof LSM or products models