Westwrn Designs Aginst Pakistan

download Westwrn Designs Aginst Pakistan

of 3

Transcript of Westwrn Designs Aginst Pakistan

  • 8/8/2019 Westwrn Designs Aginst Pakistan

    1/3

    _8

    Many policy makers are

    alerting to the partitioning of

    Pakistan which will be

    reduced to essentially thePunjab region. The NWFP

    would recover a lot of

    hydroelectric power.

    Baluchistan would recover a

    lot of gas and become a

    Turkmenistan-style gas

    republic. Sindh if portioned

    would profit from its industryand ports.With Zardaris government in shambles, a few rogue elements are actually frustrating USaims in

    achieving hegemony over the region. With US patience wearing thin George W. Bush

    gave theorder to begin surgical strikes inside Pakistan on selected targets. The US has been forced

    into such

    a posture due to the inability of its handpicked agents to curtail the Islamic elements

    within thearmy and ISI. Such a move is risky for the US as it means expanding the theatre of war,

    whilstlosing the war in the existing area. To many extents the surgical strikes are limited, sincewithout

    Pakistan completely abandoning the Mujahideen, they will crop up again elsewhere.

    Surgical strikesare therefore needed in Islamabad where the supply lines to the Mujahideen begin. This

    would

    however be seen as outright war by everyone in the Ummah, which for the US in itscurrent

    predicament is not realistic, as Pakistan needs to be weakened further to ensure almost

    certain US

    military victory.This leaves the US with only one last remaining option, and that is fragmenting Pakistan

    through

    civil strife. Such a policy was proposed in the 2005 report by the US NationalIntelligence Council

    and the CIA that forecast a Yugoslav-like fate for Pakistan. Many analysts are

    proposing such apolicy as international public opinion is being created about Pakistan being the centre of

  • 8/8/2019 Westwrn Designs Aginst Pakistan

    2/3

    global

    terrorism.9 Many policy makers are alerting to the partitioning of Pakistan which will be

    reduced toessentially the Punjab region. The NWFP would recover a lot of hydroelectric power.

    Baluchistan

    would recover a lot of gas and become a Turkmenistan-style gas republic. Sindh ifportioned would

    profit from its industry and ports.

    Its no secret that that the US alongside both Britainand India have supported Baluchi separatism. In June

    2006, Pakistan's Senate Committee on Defence

    accused British intelligence of"abetting the

    insurgency in the province bordering Iran"(PressTrust of India, 9 August 2006). Ten British MPs were

    involved in a closed door session of the Senate

    Committee on Defence regarding the alleged support

    of Britain's Secret Services to Baloch separatists.The revival of the Balouchi Liberation Army (BLA)

    by the US and Britain was confirmed in aninvestigation by News Central Asia, a private news

    agency of Turkmenistan.10The BLA emerged shortly

    after Musharrafs 1999 military coup. It has no

    tangible links to the Baloch resistance movement,which developed since the late 1940s. An aura of mystery surrounds the leadership of

    the BLA.

    The BLA bears a canny resemblance to Kosovo's Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA), whichwas

    financed by the drug trade and supported by the CIA. In Yugoslavia, US and British

    militarytraining and arms shipments helped build up the secessionist KLA from a small force of

    300

    soldiers into a sizable guerrilla army that made the province of Kosovo ungovernable.The very

    chaos that the West created was then used as a pretext for bombing

    Yugoslavia._____________________________________________________________________

    On March 24, the United States and Pakistan will convene their newly launched strategic

    dialogue. Past engagement between the two countries has been neither strategic nor adialogue. This time, Pakistan's delegation is likely to request a civilian nuclear agreement

    akin to the U.S.-India civilian nuclear deal that was initiated in 2005. Given Pakistan's

    history of proliferation, such a proposal would meet with howls of disapproval on CapitolHill and in New Delhi, not to mention healthy skepticism among some in Barack

    Obama's administration. But Washington should not reject a deal outright: It could be a

    real opportunity to put the United States's troubled relationship with Pakistan on steadierfooting.

  • 8/8/2019 Westwrn Designs Aginst Pakistan

    3/3

    COMMENTS (56) SHARE:

    Twitter

    Reddit

    Buzz

    http://smb//www.addthis.com/bookmark.php%3Fpub=fpstaff&v=250&source=tbx-250&tt=0&s=twitter&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foreignpolicy.com%2Farticles%2F2010%2F03%2F23%2Fshould_pakistan_get_a_nuke_deal&title=Should%20Pakistan%20Get%20a%20Nuke%20Deal%3F%20-%20By%20C.%20Christine%20Fair%20%7C%20Foreign%20Policy&content=&sms_ss=1&lng=enhttp://smb//www.addthis.com/bookmark.php%3Fpub=fpstaff&v=250&source=tbx-250&tt=0&s=reddit&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foreignpolicy.com%2Farticles%2F2010%2F03%2F23%2Fshould_pakistan_get_a_nuke_deal&title=Should%20Pakistan%20Get%20a%20Nuke%20Deal%3F%20-%20By%20C.%20Christine%20Fair%20%7C%20Foreign%20Policy&content=&sms_ss=1&lng=enhttp://smb//www.addthis.com/bookmark.php%3Fpub=fpstaff&v=250&source=tbx-250&tt=0&s=googlebuzz&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foreignpolicy.com%2Farticles%2F2010%2F03%2F23%2Fshould_pakistan_get_a_nuke_deal&title=Should%20Pakistan%20Get%20a%20Nuke%20Deal%3F%20-%20By%20C.%20Christine%20Fair%20%7C%20Foreign%20Policy&content=&sms_ss=1&lng=enhttp://smb//www.addthis.com/bookmark.php%3Fpub=fpstaff&v=250&source=tbx-250&tt=0&s=reddit&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foreignpolicy.com%2Farticles%2F2010%2F03%2F23%2Fshould_pakistan_get_a_nuke_deal&title=Should%20Pakistan%20Get%20a%20Nuke%20Deal%3F%20-%20By%20C.%20Christine%20Fair%20%7C%20Foreign%20Policy&content=&sms_ss=1&lng=enhttp://smb//www.addthis.com/bookmark.php%3Fpub=fpstaff&v=250&source=tbx-250&tt=0&s=googlebuzz&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foreignpolicy.com%2Farticles%2F2010%2F03%2F23%2Fshould_pakistan_get_a_nuke_deal&title=Should%20Pakistan%20Get%20a%20Nuke%20Deal%3F%20-%20By%20C.%20Christine%20Fair%20%7C%20Foreign%20Policy&content=&sms_ss=1&lng=enhttp://smb//www.addthis.com/bookmark.php%3Fpub=fpstaff&v=250&source=tbx-250&tt=0&s=twitter&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foreignpolicy.com%2Farticles%2F2010%2F03%2F23%2Fshould_pakistan_get_a_nuke_deal&title=Should%20Pakistan%20Get%20a%20Nuke%20Deal%3F%20-%20By%20C.%20Christine%20Fair%20%7C%20Foreign%20Policy&content=&sms_ss=1&lng=en