Westward Expansion - Weeblyhartporfolio.weebly.com/uploads/8/7/8/4/8784446/tws...Westward Expansion...
Transcript of Westward Expansion - Weeblyhartporfolio.weebly.com/uploads/8/7/8/4/8784446/tws...Westward Expansion...
Analysis of Student Learning !1
Standard IV: Analysis of Student Learning
The pre-test and post-test given to all 27 students was on a Social Studies unit titled
“Westward Expansion”. The pre-test and post-test given to all students was the exact same
assessment. Therefore, students would receive the exact same assessment for their post-test, as
they did for their pre-test, the questions being unchanged. The assessment consisted of twenty-
five questions. The first fifteen questions on the assessment were multiple choice and the last ten
questions were true and false. Students had the capability of earning up to 100%, on both
assessments. Figure 2.1 shows the pre/post scores for all students.
Westward Expansion
Pre/Post Scores for All Students
0
25
50
75
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
92
56
92928888
96
72
8892
80
64
96
84
68
8084
96
68
80
88
80
60
8488
60
88
48
36
4448
52
36
56
36
48
40
4844
36
12
44
52
40
56
48
2828
48
24
56
44
6056
Pre Post (Figure 2.1)
Analysis of Student Learning !2
The scores from students on the pre-test all ranged from 12% to 60%. Seven students
earned a score between 50-60%, whereas twelve students taking the pre-test earned a score
between 40-49%, four students earned scores between 30-39%, three students earned scores
between 20-29%, and only one student earned a score between 10-29%. The overall class
average for the pre-test on Westward Expansion assessment given was 43%. In a more in-depth
breakdown of pre-test scores: 1 student earned 60% (15 correct), 4 students earned 56% (14
correct), 2 students earned 52% (13 correct), 6 students earned 48% (12 correct), 4 students
earned 44% (11 correct), 2 students earned 40% (10 correct), 4 students earned 36% (9 correct),
2 students earned 28% (7 correct), 1 student earned 24% (6 correct), and 1 student earned 12% (3
correct). Figure 2.2 shows the percentage range for the entire class of 27 students on the pre-
assessment.
! Westward Expansion Pre- Assessment
!!
Class of 27 Students
Perc
enta
ge R
ange
Rec
eive
d
60-50%
49-40%
39-30%
29-20%
19-10%
Number of Students0 3 6 9 12
1
3
4
12
7
Students
(Figure 2.2)
Analysis of Student Learning !3
Below in Figure 2.3, it shows how each student performed on the pre-assessment and
what the outcomes were of each question. On the left hand side are the numbers assigned to each
student and on top is each question from the test, starting with the number one. On the last
column is the percentage score each student received. The empty square represents each question
they answered correctly, and the “N” indicated which questions the answered incorrectly on the
pre-assessment. This information on the graph represents how each student performed
individually, and has specific scores for each individual question.
!PRE-ASSESSMENT WESTWARD EXPANSION
STUDENT QUESTIONS ON TEST % 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 %
1 N N N N N N N N N N N 56
2 N N N N N N N N N N N N 60
3 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 44
4 N N N N N N N N N N N 56
5 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 24
6 N N N N N N N N N N N N N 48
7 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 28
8 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 28
9 N N N N N N N N N N N N 48
10 N N N N N N N N N N N 56
11 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 40
12 N N N N N N N N N N N N 52
13 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 44
14 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 12
15 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 36
16 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 44
Analysis of Student Learning !4
(Figure 2.3)
The pre-test was given to all 27 students before they had received any instruction
regarding the Westward Expansion. Any questions students answered correctly concerning the
Westward Expansion came from their own previous background knowledge. Many students
struggled to answer the questions and had told me that they guessed on many of the answers.
Only one student came forth and said he had studied the Westward Expansion previously on his
own.
There were quite a few commonly missed questions per Figure 2.3. Questions #1-15 were
multiple choice, and #16-25 were true and false. The most commonly missed questions on the
pre-test: #1 (26 students missed)- In 1775, Daniel Boone created a trail called…, #2 (17 students
missed)- What is one effect of the Louisiana Purchase on the United States? #4 (16 students
missed)- What was the name of the Shoshone guide that helped Lewis and Clark on their
journey? #6- Manifest Destiny is the idea that….., #8 (20 students missed)- Which town did
several major trails going west start from? #11 (19 students missed)- What effect did the
17 N N N N N N N N N N N N N 48
18 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 40
19 N N N N N N N N N N N N N 48
20 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 36
21 N N N N N N N N N 56
22 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 36
23 N N N N N N N N N N N N 52
24 N N N N N N N N N N N N N 48
25 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 44
26 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 36
27 N N N N N N N N N N N N N 48
Analysis of Student Learning !5
Industrial Revolution have on the supply of goods? #13 (21 students missed)- The offer of free
land give to settlers who were willing to move west was called…, #14 (18 students missed)-
Which territory did the United States gain as a result of the Mexican-American War? #18 (19
students missed)- True or False: Andrew Jackson sent Lewis and Clark to explore the Louisiana
Purchase. #19 (21 students missed)- True or False: The Star- Spangled Banner was originally
titled Defense of Ft. McHenry. #22 (19 students missed)- True or False: Lewis and Clark found a
water route to the Pacific Ocean. #25 (22 students missed)- True or False: Factory owners hired
many slaves to work in the factories.
After collecting the data from the pre-test, it is clear that the majority of students were
unfamiliar with the events of the Westward Expansion. The scores for the pre-assessments can be
found on Figure 2.2.
The Figure 2.4 below shows the post-test percentage range for the entire class of 27
students. The scores from students on the post-test all ranged from 56% to 96%. Seven students
earned a scores between 90-100%, thirteen students taking the post-test earned scores between
80-89%, one student earned a score between 70-79%, five students earned scores between
69-60%, and only one student earned a score between 50-59%. The overall class average for the
post-test on Westward Expansion assessment given was 82%. In a more in-depth breakdown of
post-test scores/correct answers: 3 students earned 96% (24 correct), 4 students earned 92% (23
correct), 6 students earned 88% (22 correct), 3 students earned 84% (21 correct), 4 students
earned 80% (20 correct), 1 student earned 72% (18 correct), 2 students earned 68% (17 correct),
1 student earned 64% (16 correct), 2 students earned 60% (15 correct), and 1 student earned 56%
(14 correct).
Analysis of Student Learning !6
!!Westward Expansion Post-Assessment !
Class of 27 Students
(Figure 2.4) !!!! Below is a Figure 2.5 that shows how each student performed on the post-assessment and
what the outcomes were of each question from the pre-assessment. On the left hand side are the
numbers assigned to each student and on top is each question from the test, starting with the
number one. On the last column is the percentage score each student received. The empty square
represents each question they answered correctly, and the “N” indicated which questions the
answered incorrectly on the pre-assessment. This information on the graph represents how each
student performed individually, and has specific scores for each individual question.
!
100-90%
89-80%
79-70%
69-60%
59-50%
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
1
5
1
13
7
Students
Analysis of Student Learning !7
POST-ASSESSMENT WESTWARD EXPANSION !STUDENT QUESTIONS %
(Figure 2.5)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 %
1 N N N 88
2 N N N N N N N N N N 60
3 N N N 88
4 N N N N 84
5 N N N N N N N N N N 60
6 N N N N N 80
7 N N N 88
8 N N N N N 80
9 N N N N N N N N 68
10 N 96
11 N N N N 84
12 N N N N N 80
13 N N N N N N N N 68
14 N N N N 84
15 N 96
16 N N N N N N N N N 64
17 N N N N N 80
18 N N 92
19 N N N 88
20 N N N N N N N 72
21 N 96
22 N N N 88
23 N N N 88
24 N N 92
25 N N 92
26 N N N N N N N N N N N 56
27 N N 92
Analysis of Student Learning !8
The post-test was given to all 27 students after they had received all instruction from the
seven lesson plans regarding the Westward Expansion. Many students seemed confident when
taking the assessment, and were even allotted to use any notes taken throughout the unit as a
reference. Many students, even though they had their notes, failed to even look at them as a
reference.
There were only a few commonly missed questions per Figure 2.5. Questions #1-15 were
multiple choice, and #16-25 were true and false. The most commonly missed questions on the
pre-test:#3 (9 students missed)- Which trail would someone take who was seeking to find their
fortune in gold? #14 (18 students missed)- Which territory did the United States gain as a result
of the Mexican-American War? #18 (19 students missed)- True or False: Andrew Jackson sent
Lewis and Clark to explore the Louisiana Purchase. #20 (10 students missed)- True or False:
Thomas Jefferson bought the Louisiana Purchase from England. #22 (19 students missed)- True
or False: Lewis and Clark found a water route to the Pacific Ocean.
After collecting the data from the post-test, it is evident that the majority of students
gained a decent amount of knowledge and were familiar with the events of the Westward
Expansion. The scores for the post-assessments can be found on Figure 2.5.
Below in Figure 2.7 is a chart that displays the data for the pre-test, post-test, and the
improvement of each student. The far left column is numbered 1-27, representing each student.
Some students are apart of subgroups and can be identified by the code next to their number.
(HLL- High Level Learner, IEP- Student with an Individual Education Plan in R-Reading, M-
Math, W-Writing, S-Speech, ELL- English Language Leaner).
Analysis of Student Learning !9
Improvement Chart
(Figure 2.7)
Student Pretest Post Test Improvement
1 56% 88% 32%
2 60% 60% 0%
3 44% 88% 44%
4 HLL R 56% 84% 28%
5 IEP R,M 24% 60% 36%
6 48% 80% 32%
7 28% 88% 60%
8 28% 80% 52%
9 IEP R,W,M 48% 68% 20%
10 56% 96% 40%
11 40% 84% 44%
12 ELL/IEP R,W,M 52% 80% 28%
13 IEP R,W,M 44% 68% 24%
14 ELL 12% 84% 72%
15 HLL R 36% 96% 60%
16 IEP R,S 44% 64% 20%
17 48% 80% 32%
18 40% 92% 52%
19 48% 88% 40%
20 36% 72% 36%
21 ELL 56% 96% 40%
22 36% 88% 52%
23 52% 88% 36%
24 HLL R 48% 92% 44%
25 44% 92% 48%
26 36% 56% 20%
27 HLL R 48% 92% 44%
Analysis of Student Learning !10
Above in Figure 2.7, as displayed by percentages, 26 out of 27 students made
improvement from the pre-test to the post-test. The one student who did not improve received the
same score on her pre-test and post-test. This student happened to be absent quite frequently
during this unit. All other students showed growth from 20-72%, the class average of
improvement being 38%.
Figure 2.8 below displays the pre and post-test scores of all students who are considered
to be in subgroups. Students are considered to be in a sub group if they are: HLL- High Level
Learner, ELL- English Language Learner, or a student with an IEP- Individual Education Plan.
Specific areas of subgroups: R-Reading, W-Writing, M-Math, S-Speech.
!
0
25
50
75
100
4HLL
R
5 IEP R,M
9 IEP RWM
12 ELL
/IEP RWM
13 IE
P RWM14
ELL
15 HLL
R
16 IE
P RS21
ELL
24 HLL
R
27 HLL
R
929296
64
96
84
68
80
6860
84
484856
4436
12
4452
48
24
56
Pre Post
(Figure 2.8)
Analysis of Student Learning !11
Summary of Lessons & Assessments After analyzing the data and results of the pre-test given to all students, I organized the
information students still needed to know to prepare for the post test. These concepts were then
organized into seven different lessons that aligned with the standards and objectives from the
Utah Core Curriculum. Each lesson was designed with assessments to then determine the
understanding and knowledge of each student. The lessons that were created and used for
instruction for this Teacher Work Sample (TWS) were designed according to the main events that
occurred during the Westward Expansion. There was no organized program that these lessons
were found in, however, all concepts, vocabulary, and knowledge needed to design these lessons
derive from and are aligned with the Utah Core Curriculum. Being that the pre and post test are
the same, all questions from these assessments have been taken from these seven lessons/
formative assessments. These lessons were as follows:
!Lesson 1- Formative Assessment: Students were to identify and discuss the reasons why people
moved west and how they did or did not survive during the Westward Expansion. Assessment:
Students started a foldable on the Westward Expansion.
!Lesson 2- Formative Assessment: Students were to discuss the events that happened during the
Louisiana Purchase and the expedition of Lewis & Clark. Assessment: Students completed a
guide, and wrote a newspaper article as if they were on the expedition, retelling an adventure that
had happened.
!
Analysis of Student Learning !12
Lesson 3- Formative Assessment: Students were to discuss the War of 1812, The Star spangled
Banner, and Symbols of America. Assessment: Students completed a informational chart on the
symbols of America, and were required to place the lyrics of the Star- Spangled Banner in order.
!Lesson 4- Formative Assessment: Students explained the impact of the Westward Expansion on
the Native Americans. Assessment: Students wrote a paragraph explaining the impact of the
expansion on Native Americans.
!Lesson 5: Students were to discuss the events of the Homestead Act and needed to compare the
trails used during the Westward Expansion. Assessment: Students wrote an advertisement to
encourage people to move west.
!Lesson 6: Students discussed and examined the ways that the Gold Rush impacted the Westward
Expansion. Assessment: Students wrote a paragraph explaining how the Gold Rush affected the
expansion.
!Lesson 7: Students explained how the Industrial Revolution helped the Westward Expansion.
Assessment: Students need to write a short summary explaining how the Industrial Revolution
affected the Westward Expansion.
!!!!
Analysis of Student Learning !13
Summary of Individual Performance on Assessments ! To determine the effectiveness of each lesson and its’ assessment given to each student, I
analyzed the results of three students: High Level Learner (HLL)(High), a student with an
Individual Education Plan (IEP)(Medium), and an English Language Learner (ELL)(Low).
Below in Figure 2.9 are the scores from each assessment, including pre & post scores, growth
from pre to post assessment, and the class average on the exact assignments.
A# = Assignment # H- High Student M- Medium Student L- Low Student (Figure 2.9)
* Categories with two scores were assessments that encompassed two parts to the assessment. * Growth is based off of improvement from pre-test to post-test.
Student #15, a High Level Leaner, received 36% on her pre-test and 96% on her post-
test. She above average on all the the formative assessments from lessons 1-7, as well as on
summative assessments. Her growth from pre to post test was 60%. Her score of 36% indicates
that she answered 9 out of 25 correctly on the pre-test.
The questions student #15 missed on the pre-test were concerning events from the
Westward Expansion such as: the name of the trail Daniel Boone created, the three goals of
Lewis and Clark on their expedition, their Shoshone guide, the idea of Manifest Destiny, Indian
Removal Act, famous trails heading west, Industrial Revolution, Homestead Act, territory gained
from the Mexican-American War, the Louisiana Purchase, and the Trail of Tears. Student #15
Student Pre A #1 A #2 A #3 A #4 A #5 A #6 A #7 Post Growth
#15 H 36% 100% 100/100 100/100 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 60%
#9 M 48% 100% 92/90 92/100 75% 0% 100% 75% 68% 20%
#12 L 52% 90% 88/80 52/19 75% 80% 100% 75% 80% 28%
Class 43% 97% 94/87 86/88 98% 94% 93% 97% 82% 39%
Analysis of Student Learning !14
was not proficient in the pre-test, but through the assessments given during the unit, she showed
wonderful growth and mastery of knowledge. Her post-test score of 96% indicates that she only
missed one question, which was regarding the three goals of Lewis & Clark’s expedition.
Throughout the assessments given to her, student #15 scored highly. In every assessment,
she received 100%. This student is very outgoing, yet soft spoken. She is very active and highly
involved in the classroom. She collaborates effectively with peers, engages in all class
discussions, and is usually the first one with her hand up. She brings a wonderful sense of
thinking more deeply about concepts. She often will raise her hand and explore the topic at hand
in a more in-depth manner. After the pre-test student #15 approached me and recalled the things
she already knew about the Westward Expansion. She then continued to tell me how excited she
was to learn more. This student is always quick to pick up on concepts, topics, and strategies.
Throughout this unit she displayed mastery and inquired frequently about the things she did not
know. I feel that this student learned the objectives well and I know because she demonstrated so
by participating, collaborating with others, ask in-depth questions, and scoring above average on
all assessments, with 96% on her post-test. I gave her in-depth writing prompts, encouraged her
to write more, and asked her to explain how these events affected the Westward Expansion. All
of student #15’s articles of evidence may be found in Appendix C.
! Student #9, Medium level student with an Individual Education Plan (IEP) in reading,
writing, and math, received 48% on his pre-test and 68% on his post-test. He scored above
average on four out of seven assessments and average or below average on the other three
assessments. His post-test score was also considered below average. His growth from the pre-test
Analysis of Student Learning !15
to the post-test was 20%. His pre-test percentage of 48% indicates that he answered 12 out of 25
questions correctly.
The questions student #9 missed on the pre-test were concerning events from the
Westward Expansion such as: the name of the trail Daniel Boone created, the three goals of
Lewis and Clark on their expedition, their Shoshone guide, the idea of Manifest Destiny, famous
trails heading west, the Industrial Revolution, technology advances, the Homestead Act,
Religious groups being persecuted, the Louisiana Purchase, symbols of America, and the Trail of
Tears.
Student #9 was not proficient in the pre-test, but he did show mastery of four out of seven
of the assessments. Two of the assessments he scored average, and was absent during one
assessment, therefore received an automatic zero. His post-test results shows that he struggled
with still understanding concepts surrounding Lewis & Clark’s three goals, famous trails heading
west, the Homestead act, the Mexican-American War (he answered correctly on pre-test), the
Indian Removal Act (he answered correctly on pre-test), religious groups being persecuted, the
Louisiana Purchase, and the Trail of Tears. The scores that student #9 received shows that he has
some understanding of the Westward Expansion, but struggles to recall events.
Student #9 is a quiet, but happy student who is often timid when answering questions. He
will collaborate with others, but frequently tends to hang back, is unsure of himself. When
participating in classroom discussions, he will raise his hand to share, but gives his answer
undecidedly, like a lingering question. When he understands a concept completely, he is
extremely focused until the task is complete. With regards to this unit on Westward Expansion,
there were times when he would tell me he didn’t understand and would ask for further
Analysis of Student Learning !16
explanations. This student met some of the objectives, but truthfully seemed to struggle. I feel
that I should have helped this student more with understanding the concepts, by checking in with
him more frequently, and giving him more opportunities to make connections with how these
events affected the Westward Expansion. There were many activities and opportunities to
collaborate with others, but I could have given him more ways or strategies to connect to the
topic. Student #9 is very dedicated, and puts for an extreme amount of effort. All of student #9’s
articles of evidence may be found in Appendix C.
! Student #12, Low level student who is an English Language Learner (ELL), and has an
Individual Education Plan (IEP) for reading, writing, and math, received 52% on his pre-test and
80% on his post-test. He scored above average on 4 out of 7 assessments, average on 2
assessments, and below average on 1 assessment. His post score however, was considered just
about average with a 80%. His growth from the pre-test to the post-test was 28%. He pre-test
percentage of 52% indicates that he answered 13 out of 25 questions correctly.
The questions student #12 missed on the pre-test were concerning events from the
Westward Expansion such as: the name of the trail Daniel Boone created, events surrounding the
Louisiana Purchase, the three goals of Lewis & Clark, the idea of Manifest Destiny, the Indian
Removal Act, famous trails heading west, the Industrial Revolution, the Homestead Act, and the
Mexican-American War. Student #12 was not proficient in the pre-test, however, he showed
incredible growth throughout his assignments and assessments. On his post-test, student #12
received 80%, indicating that he scored 20 out of 25. His scores show that his understanding has
Analysis of Student Learning !17
increased, struggling with only the concepts of the Industrial Revolution, the Homestead Act, the
Indian Removal act, and the expedition of Lewis and Clark.
Student #12 has struggled with many different concepts throughout the year, but has
made incredible changes, improvements, and signs of putting forth effort and interest. This
student participated more during the study of the Westward Expansion than any other topic. He
would ask questions, want to share when reviewing, and was motivated when completing the
assessments concerning this topic. I am truly impressed with his score of 80%, as this is a
wonderful accomplishment for this student. While assignments have been tailored to fit some of
his needs being an ELL student with an IEP, he has met those expectations. He has put forth
effort and shown interest that hasn’t been seen all year long. Student #12 has made exceptional
progress and shown he is capable of learning and retaining information concerning the Westward
Expansion. Student #12 met almost all of the objectives, except assessment #3. He struggled
with understanding symbols in America. I feel that I could have helped him relate the importance
of symbols to him by connecting him to symbols we see and use in our everyday life. The other
objectives he met with at least an average score or higher. I know that he understood and
mastered those objectives through conversations I’ve had with him, explanations he’s given me,
the connections he has been able to make to the events, his ability to express and write about
how these many events affected the Westward Expansion, and his post-test scores, and
completing of assessments. All of student #12’s articles of evidence may be found in Appendix
C.
!!
Analysis of Student Learning !18
Pre-Assessment and Post-Assessment Findings
The class’s average score on the pretest was 43% and on the post-test was 82%. For all 27
students, the average improvement or growth rate was 39%. I’m happy to say 26 out of 27
students showed improvement from their pre-test to their post test. The students who scored less
than the class average had scores consisting of 4 students with 80%, 1 student with 72%, 2 with
68%, 1 with 64%, 1 with 60%, and 1 with 56%. While these ten students were below the class
average, five of them were considered passing, and 4 of them were just under the class average.
The student with the 60% scored the same percentage on her pre-test, and is currently being
tested for Special Education. All of these students increased their scores, except the one, rising
from scores of 48% to 80%, 28% to 80%, 52% to 80%, 48% to 80%, 36% to 72%, 48% to 68%,
44% to 68%, and 36% to 56%. The improvement ranging from 20% of growth to 52%. You can
refer back to figure 2.7 on page 9 for a chart containing all class scores.
With each lesson being taught and an assessment being administered, students knowledge
grew substantially. While some students took the pre-assessment with some prior background
knowledge, their understanding continued to grow and their scores reflect their current
knowledge concerning the Westward Expansion. From reviewing both pre and post assessments,
the evidence from the assessments supports what pre-test scores show, that students struggled
mostly with understanding the goals of the Lewis & Clark expedition, the famous trails used to
head west, and advances in technology during the Industrial Revolution. However, the data also
showed that the assessments contradicted the findings from the pre-assessment, as students
knowledge grew and showed greater understanding with each assessment.
!
Analysis of Student Learning !19
To take the pre-test, students were only allowed to come with the previous background
knowledge, no material on the subject had been taught yet. So there was many incorrect answers.
Due to the fact that I didn’t get to teach them beforehand, there was nothing I could have done to
prepare them, the pre-test was to serve as a guide of what needed to still be taught, and become
aware of the knowledge students already had. The post-test however came after I had taught
students the seven lessons. The results and findings from the post-test have indicated multiple
things concerning my teaching. Students were unsure of the goals of Lewis & Clark, the
expedition, and details on the Louisiana Purchase, topics of which I thought I had covered
extremely well. I also noticed a common trend in uncertainty around the famous trails used to
head west and their individual purposes. Looking back now, I can see the my teaching isn’t
always as clear as I think it is. I could have spent more time talking about the trails and had
students participate in activities to clarify the different purposes. I could have also had students
collaborate with one another to determine the goals of Lewis & Clark.
My part in the students’ learning was to be a facilitator, and encourage students to
collaborate and engage in the discovery of the Westward Expansion. I instructed students using
the map, power points, pictures, hands-on activities such as panning for gold, the use of
technology and the internet, articles for reading, video clips, creative writing activities, and to
have students use literacy skills such as reading, writing, speaking, and listening to learn about
the many events that affected the Westward Expansion.
!!
Analysis of Student Learning !20
Validity of Assessment Instruments in Measuring Learning
After seeing the data results from student’s post-assessment, I began to wonder about the
validity of a few of the questions. Question #3 “What were the three goals that Lewis & Clark
were supposed to meet on their expedition?”- 9 students missed this question because they were
confused thinking that one of the goals was to farm the land (was an option), when it was really
to record observations about the region. This question could be considered invalid because it is
too closely related to the real answer that seem to cause students much confusion. Question #15
“Which tribe of Native Americans was NOT involved in the Indian Removal Act?”- 8 students
missed this question because it was never really talked about during the unit, we focused on
those tribes that were involved in the Indian Removal Act, not ones that weren’t affected. There
was a True/False question that 8 students missed- #23 “Most of the factories built during the
Industrial Revolution were in the Southern States.” I feel like this question wasn’t valid because
it also was not talked about or brought up in the lessons. Students did not have a concept of
where that was taking place.
The validity of the assessments given are measured by the close alignment of the
objectives and standards from the Utah Core Curriculum with the lesson and assessments. The
assessments were each aligned with an objective and standard that was continuos throughout
each lesson. I used formative assessments throughout the duration of each lesson to measure if
students were prepared for the questions on the post-test.
!!
!
Analysis of Student Learning !21
Subgroup’s Student Learning !Boys vs. Girls
! (Figure 2.10) !
In the above Figure 2.9 the pre-test and post-test scores are broken down between the
boys and girls in the 5th grade classroom. There are 27 students total, with 12 boys and 15 girls.
From the graph you can see that the boys scored higher on the pre-test with an average of 45%.
The girls scored an average of 42% from the pre-test. As far as the pre-test, the boys scored 3%
higher than the girls. However, on the post-test the girls scored an average of 83%, which is 3%
higher than the boys. Both groups have shown dramatic growth, the boys improvement with
35%, and the girls being 41% overall. The girls scored higher on the post-test with a higher
improvement rate.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Male Female
8380
4245
Pre Post
Analysis of Student Learning !22
English Language Learners vs. Non- English Language Leaners !
(Figure 2. 11)
The above Figure 2.11 displays the pre-test and post-test scores for English Language
Learners in contrast to non-English Language Learners. From the graph you can see that on the
pre-test ELL students scored an average of 40%, whereas non-English Language Learners scored
an average of 44%, with a 4% higher rate. On the post-test, ELL students scored an average of
87% and non-English Language Learners scored an average of 81%. The English Language
Learners scored a 7% higher rate on the post test than the non-English Language Learners. The
English Language Learns scored higher and showed greater improvement overall.
!
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
ELL Other Students
8187
4440
Pre Post
Analysis of Student Learning !23
Students with an Individual Education Plan vs. Other Students IEP in Reading, Writing, and Math
* Numbers on graph are represented in percentages (Figure 2.12)
Above in Figure 2.12 scores from both the pre-test and post-test are compared between
students with an Individual Education Plan and other students. These students with an IEP have
specific areas in which they are receiving interventions. The pre-test scores for IEP students had
an average of 42% and the other students had an average pre-test score of 44%, with a 2% higher
rate. The students with an IEP scored an average of 68% on their post-test, whereas other
students scored an average of 85%, with a 17% higher rate. Both groups showed improvement
with IEP students showing growth by 24%, and other students showing growth by 41%. The
students without IEP’s averaged higher in both the pre-test and post-test.
0
22.5
45
67.5
90
IEP R, W, M Other Students
85
68
4442
Pre Post
Analysis of Student Learning !24
Higher Level Learners vs. Other Students HLL in Reading
(Figure 2.13) !!! Displayed in Figure 2.13 above are the pre-test and post-test scores for Higher Level
Learners compared to other students. These students are higher learners in Reading. Their pre-
test scores on average were 47%, with a 4 % higher average than other students at an average of
43%. HLL scored an average of 91%, with an 11% higher average than other students with an
average of 80%. Both groups showed remarkable improvement and growth with HLL gaining an
44% rate, and other students gaining a 37% rate. HLL scored higher on both the pre-test, post-
test, and showed more growth and improvement overall.
!!!!
0
25
50
75
100
HLL Other Students
80
91
4347
Pre Post
Analysis of Student Learning !25
High, ELL & Low Students More In-depth Analysis on 3 Target Students !
Student #15 - High
(Figure 2.14) * Numbers on bar graphs represent percentage received. !
Student #15 is a High Level Learner in Reading. She scored 36% on her pre-test, and
96% on her post-test. Her improvement from pre-test to post-test was substantial with a growth
of 60%. She did extremely well and met all objectives. These scores are reflected above in
Figure 2.14.
!!!!!!
0
25
50
75
100
High
96
36
Pre-Test Post-Test
Analysis of Student Learning !26
!Student #9- Medium/Low
Student has an IEP in Reading, Writing, and Math
! (Figure 2.15) !!
* Numbers on bar graph are represent percentages received.
Student #9 scored 48% on the pre-test, and then scored 68% on the post-test. He showed
improvement by 20% from the pre-test to the post-test. These scores are reflected above in
Figure 2.15.
!!!!!!
01020304050607080
Medium/Low
68
48
Pre-Test Post-Test
Analysis of Student Learning !27
Student #12- ELL/ Low
(Figure 2.16)
Student #12 scored 52% on the pre-test and 80% on the post-test. He showed wonderful
improvement by 28% from the pre-test to the post-test. These scores are reflected above in
Figure 2.16.
0
20
40
60
80
ELL/ LowPre- Test Post- Test