Westinghouse AP1000 Design Control Document Rev. 18 - Tier ...
Westinghouse AP1000 Program Status
Transcript of Westinghouse AP1000 Program Status
Westinghouse AP1000 Program Status
Bernd Döhnert
Westinghouse Electric Company LLC
June 2002
AP600 Investment in Technology
V E S S E L S U P P O R T
I N S U L A T I O N
SUPPORT
R E M O V A B L EI N S U L A T I O NSUPPORT
P E R M A N E N TCAVITY
SEAL RING
SHIELD BLOCK
O U T L E T V E N TD A M P E R
I N S U L A T I O N
T/C
INLET FLOATBALLS
C O L D L E G
H O T L E G
WATER IN
S T E A M / W A T E R O U T
Passive Safety Systems
US Licensing Approval
Reduced Components & Commodity Components
Severe Accidents Mitigation Features Short Engineering and
Construction Schedule
Advanced Design Features
Modular Construction
AP600 is Mature Design
• Design Maturity
– 1300 man-year / $400 million design and testing effort
– More than 12,000 design documents completed
– 3D computer model developed
• Includes structures, equipment, small / large pipe, cable trays, ducts ...
• Licensing Maturity
– Very thorough / complete NRC review of AP600
• 110 man-year effort (NRC) over 6 years, $30 million
• Independent, confirmatory plant analysis
• Independent, confirmatory plant testing (ROSA, OSU)
• 7400+ questions answered, no open items
• 380+ meeting with NRC, 43 meetings with ACRS
– NRC Design Certification issued 12/99
Why Develop AP1000?
• AP600 meets industry objectives defined in EPRI ALWR Utility Requirements Document (<4.3 ¢/kwh)
• Electric generation environment has significantly changed due to deregulation
– New target generation cost < 3 ¢/kwh
• AP600 cannot achieve this new target through incremental improvements
• This motivated Westinghouse to consider major uprate alternative
AP600 to AP1000 Design Changes
• Increase Core Length & Number of Assemblies
• Increase Size of Key NSSS Components
– Increased height of Reactor Vessel
– Larger Steam Generators
– Larger canned Reactor Coolant Pumps
– Larger Pressurizer
• Increase Containment Height
• Some Capacity Increases in Passive Safety System Components
• Turbine Island Capacity Increased for Power Rating
Retained AP600 Nuclear Island Footprint
AP1000 General ArrangementPlan at Elevation 135’
AP600 AP1000
AP1000 General ArrangementContainment Section View
AP600 AP1000
Comparison of Selected Parameters
Net Electric Output, MWe(2.5”HgA)
Reactor Power, MWt
Hot Leg Temperature, oF
Number of Fuel Assemblies
Type of Fuel Assembly
Active Fuel Length, ft
Linear Heat Rating, kW/ft
R/V I.D., inches
Vessel Thermal Design Flow, gpm
Steam Generator Surface Area, ft2
Reactor Coolant Pump Flow, gpm
Pressurizer Volume, ft3
610
1933
600
145
17x17
12
4.10
157
194,200
75,000
51,000
1600
AP600 AP1000
1117
3400
610
157
17x17
14
5.71
157
299,880
125,000
78,750
2100
PARAMETER
985
2988
626
157
17x17
14
5.02
157
295,500
68,000
103,400
1400
Doel 4 / Tihange 3
AP1000 Design Certification Application
• Formal Application was submitted March 28, 2002– Complete Safety Analysis Report for AP1000 Standard Plant
– Full Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) Report
– Technical Specifications
– Supporting topical reports
• NRC Pre- Certification Review has already established that AP600 testing and safety analysis codes are sufficient for AP1000 design certification.
Capital Cost is Critical Issue for New Plants in U.S.
•Nuclear likely to compete head-to-head against coal plants and natural gas plants
•Nuclear production costs (Fuel plus O&M) already low -- approaching 1 cent/KW-hr.
• Investors will expect payback of capital costs within 20 years of operation
•Overnight capital cost will need to be in the $1000-1300/KWe range for long-term competitiveness with natural gas
Electricity Price Required to Cover Investment Cost - US Conditions
500600700800900
1,0001,1001,2001,3001,4001,500
2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0
Electricity Price To Cover Investment (cents/kwh)
Overn
igh
t C
ost
($/K
We) 12% 14% 16%Nominal After-Tax Equity IRR
Includes 1.1 cents/kwh for O,M&F, Cap Adds, and Decomm.
18%
3% Inflation
15% 17%13%
Impact of Technology Innovation on Plant Price
0
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
Power Level, (MWe)
Ove
rnig
ht C
apit
al C
ost
($/K
We)
Passive ALWR
Evolutionary ALWR
* AP1000
Earliest New Plant Order in US - 2005ID Task Name
1 AP1000 Design Certification2 Engineering Design3 NRC Pre-Certification Review4 Prepare Safety Analysis Report5 NRC Review (Issue FDA)6 Hearings / Rule (Issue DC)7
8
9 U.S. Utilities Early Site Permit10 Decide on Plan and Select Site11 Prepare Application12 NRC Review13 Hearings (Issue ESP)14
15
16 U.S. Utility Combined Op License17 Prepare Application18 NRC Review (Issue SER)19 Hearings (Issue COL)
SUBMIT DC APPLICATION
SUBMIT ESP APPLICATION
SUBMIT COL APPLICATION
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
AP1000 Business Plan Development
• Developed with US Power Companies to:
– Assess the Economic Competitiveness of AP1000
– Validate the Cost/Price Estimate with Independent (Bechtel) Review
– Develop a Sample Project Implementation Model
• Financial Evaluation Based on a Series of 4 Twin Standard Plants
– Provide a Plan for the Next Steps for Commercialization
– Determine Government Support for Commercialization and Risk Management
AP1000/AP600 Role in U.S. Energy Market• Electricity Demand in the United States is Projected
to Increase
• Westinghouse Supports Industry Goals to Maintain the Nuclear Generation Share of the Market (Maintain 20%)
• Environmental Benefits of Emission Free Nuclear Power - A Future Strength that will be Increasingly Valued
• A Family of Standard AP1000 Plants is Competitive with Current Projected Generation Prices
• DOE and Administration are Providing Increased Support for Near-Term Start of Additional Nuclear Capacity
AP1000 Overview
• Technical Feasibility of AP1000 Established
• Retains AP600 Design Detail
• Retains Credibility of Cost Estimateand Construction Schedule
• Established Regulatory Framework
• AP1000 provides 75% power upratefor 15% increment in capital cost
• AP1000 Meets New Plant Economic Targets in the Near Term