West Bengal Background Report of MLAs&Candidates 2011

8/10/2019 West Bengal Background Report of MLAs&Candidates 2011

1/116

Data in this Kit is presented in good faith, with an intention to inform voters.Candidates' affidavit with nomination papers is the

source of this analysis. www.adrindia.org, www.myneta.info

WEST BENGAL ELECTION WATCH 2011

ANALYSIS OF CRIMINAL, FINANCIAL AND OTHER DETAILS OF

MLAS AND CANDIDATES FROM WEST BENGAL

BASED ON 2011 ASSEMBLY ELECTIONS

A report by

WEST BENGAL ELECTION WATCH

&

ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS

Association for Democratic Reforms

B-1/6, Upper Ground Floor

Hauz Khas,

Delhi-110016

Ph: 011-40817601, Fax:

011-46094248

Email:[email protected]


2/116

Data in this Kit is presented in good faith, with an intention to inform voters. Candidates' affidavit with nomination papers is the


ii

FOREWORD

West Bengal Election Watch, which is an associate of National Election Watch, is a civil society initiative

for dissiminating to the public information about those who offer themselves for election to thelegislature. The West Bengal Elections Watch is conducted by non political persons whose only concern

has been to create awareness of the public about the relevant information which the candidates

themselves furnish about themselves.

West Bengal Election Watch conducted scrutiny of the affidavits of 1263 candidates who had contested

the recently held General Election to the West Bengal Legislative Assembly and published the

background information about them in several phases. The said background information about the

candidates included whether criminal cases were pending against them, their educational qualifications,

value of their assets, whether they were paying income tax, etc.

The Election Commission of India ought to be congratulated for peacefully conducting the said General

Election of 2011 in which the majority of voters could freely and without fear exercise their franchise.

The same was possible largely because of deployment of large contingent of police and para military

forces. One would hope that use of such security personnel would be required every time an election is

held in future. In near future every voter ought to be able to freely cast his vote without the need for

police protection.

Matter of immediate concern is election of a fairly large number of members who have criminal

background and of those who have increasing money power.

Thus among 184 Trinomul Congress Legislators, criminal cases are pending against 69 (38%), 17 (41%) ofout of 42 Congrss members have criminal cases against them. There are criminal charges against nine

ministers of the West Bengal Government. None out of 40 CPM members have criminal cases pending

against them (18%).


3/116



iii

Forty seven members of the current Legislative Assembly are Crorepati, the richest among them is

worth 12 crore. There are several other disturbing features about several members of the West Bengal

Assembly which have come out from the particulars furnished by them.

One is reminded about the speech deliverd by Dr. Rajendra Prasad who was the President of the

Constituent Assembly, after the Constitution was finally adopted on 26thNovember 1949, when asked

whether India would be able to keep its independence, Dr. Rajendra Prasad had expressed hope that the

Country would produce men of strong character, men of vision who will not sacrifice the interest of the

Country at large for the sake of smaller groups and who would rise above the prejudices of these

differences. When the same question was put to Dr. B. R. Amedkar, he among other things had

emphasized that while Constitution had provided for political equality but social and economic equality

among all sections must be also achieved.

The aim of this publication about the particulars of candidates in the last General Election is to bring

about more transparency and to ensure greater public awareness about the profile of those whom they

have elected as members of the West Bengal Assembly.

Chittatosh Mookerjee

Former Chief Justice of Mumbai

Calcutta High Courts and President of the West Bengal Election Watch


4/116



iv

Acknowledgement

On behalf of West Bengal Election Watch we would like to acknowledge the support and the

contribution of the following persons and organisations in our work:

All Members of the Governing Body of Forum of Voluntary Organizations-West Bengal, specially West

Bengal Gandhi Peace Foundation, Institute for Indian Mother & Child, IMSE Gram Training Centre,

Birbhum, FIAN West Bengal, State Public Information Officer, West Bengal Legislative Assembly

Secretariat, Kolkata Press Club, National Election Watch, Association for Democratic Reforms, all

volunteers of West Bengal Election Watch and all others who worked day and night selflessly to make

the West Bengal Election Watch process successful.


5/116



v

Contents

WEST BENGAL 2011 ASSEMBLY ELECTIONS ............................................................................................................ 1

REPRESENTATION OF POLITICAL PARTIES

.............................................................................................................................. 1GROWTH IN NUMBER OF CANDIDATES ................................................................................................................................ 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF MLAS AND CANDIDATES .............................................................................................. 1SUMMARY OF MLAS ...................................................................................................................................................... 1

SUMMARY OF CANDIDATES .............................................................................................................................................. 2

ANALYSIS BASED ON PENDING CRIMINAL CASES ................................................................................................... 3ANALYSIS BASED ON PENDING CRIMINAL CASESMLAS ......................................................................................................... 3

PARTY-WISE BREAK UP OF MLAS WITH PENDING CRIMINAL CASES ........................................................................................... 3

SERIOUS CRIMES DISTRIBUTION FOR MAJOR PARTIES-MLAS .................................................................................................... 3

PARTY -WISE COMPARISON OF PENDING CRIMINAL CASES ON MLAS IN WEST BENGAL ASSEMBLY ELECTIONS,2006AND 2011.......... 4

TOP 20MLAS WITH MOST SERIOUS PENDING CRIMINAL CASES ............................................................................................... 5

CROREPATI MLAS-PARTY WISE BREAK UP .......................................................................................................................... 7

AVERAGE ASSETS PER MLAFOR MAJOR PARTIES ................................................................................................................... 7

TOP 20MLAS WITH HIGH ASSETS ..................................................................................................................................... 8

TOP 10MLAS WITH LOW ASSETS ...................................................................................................................................... 9

TOP 10MLAS WITH HIGHEST LIABILITIES ............................................................................................................................ 9

CROREPATI MLAS (2006VS 2011) ................................................................................................................................ 10

CHANCES OF WINNING BASED ON ASSETS .......................................................................................................................... 10

ASSET POSITION IN CONSTITUENCY AMONG CANDIDATES AND CHANCES OF WINNING ................................................................. 10

ANALYSIS BASED ON INCOME TAX AND PAN DETAILS OF MLAS .......................................................................... 11TOP 10MLAS WITH HIGH ASSETS WHO HAVE NOT FILED ITR ................................................................................................ 11

NO.OF MLAS BASED ON INCOME TAX DECLARATION -PARTY-WISE ....................................................................................... 11

TOP 10MLAS WHO DECLARED THE HIGHEST INCOME IN INCOME TAX RETURNS (ITR) .............................................................. 12

NUMBER OF MLAS WHO HAVE PAID TAXYEAR-WISE ........................................................................................................ 12

DETAILS OF MLAS WHO HAVE NOT DECLARED THEIR PAN .................................................................................................... 13

ANALYSIS BASED ON EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND OF MLAS ............................................................................. 13OVERALL EDUCATION REPORT ........................................................................................................................................ 13

EDUCATION ANALYSIS OF MLAS-PARTY-WISE .................................................................................................................... 13

LIST OF MLAS WHO ARE PHDHOLDERS ........................................................................................................................... 14

ANALYSIS BASED ON GENDER - MLAS .................................................................................................................. 15COMPARISON OF MEN AND WOMEN MLAS IN 2011AND 2006ELECTIONS ............................................................................ 15

ANALYSIS BASED ON AGE GROUP MLAS ........................................................................................................... 15AGE ANALYSIS OF MLAS-PARTY-WISE ............................................................................................................................. 15

ANALYSIS OF RE-ELECTED MLAS .......................................................................................................................... 16

SUMMARY OF ASSET COMPARISON OF RE-ELECTED MLAS .................................................................................................... 16AVERAGE ASSET INCREASE FOR RE-ELECTED MLAS:PARTY-WISE ............................................................................................ 16

ASSET COMPARISON FOR RE-ELECTED MLAS...................................................................................................................... 16

ANALYSIS OF COUNCIL OF MINISTERS ................................................................................................................. 20PENDING CRIMINAL CASES DETAILS................................................................................................................................... 20

FINANCIAL DETAILS ....................................................................................................................................................... 20

AVERAGE ASSET AND PANDETAILS OF MINISTERS ............................................................................................................... 21

FULL ASSETS DETAILS OF MINISTERS .................................................................................................................................. 22


6/116



vi

FULL DETAILS OF PENDING CRIMINAL CASES ON MINISTER ..................................................................................................... 23

ANALYSIS BASED ON PENDING CRIMINAL CASES- CANDIDATES .......................................................................... 27PARTY-WISE BREAK UP OF CANDIDATES WITH PENDING CRIMINAL CASES .................................................................................. 27

SERIOUS CRIMES DISTRIBUTIONSERIOUS IPCCOUNT FOR PARTIES ....................................................................................... 28

PARTY-WISE COMPARISON OF PENDING CRIMINAL CASES ON CANDIDATES IN THE WEST BENGAL ASSEMBLY ELECTIONS 2006VS 2011

................................................................................................................................................................................. 31

TOP 20CANDIDATES WITH SERIOUS PENDING CRIMINAL CASES .............................................................................................. 32

ANALYSIS BASED ON ASSETS ............................................................................................................................... 34ANALYSIS BASED ON ASSETSCANDIDATES ........................................................................................................................ 34

AVERAGE ASSETS OF CANDIDATES -PARTY-WISE ................................................................................................................. 35

TOP 20CANDIDATES WITH HIGH ASSETS ........................................................................................................................... 35

TOP 20CANDIDATES WITH LOW ASSETS ............................................................................................................................ 37

TOP 10CANDIDATES WITH HIGHEST LIABILITIES .................................................................................................................. 38

HIGH ASSET CANDIDATES WHO LOST THE ELECTIONS ............................................................................................................ 39

ANALYSIS BASED ON INCOME TAX AND PAN DETAILS OF CANDIDATES ............................................................... 40TOP 5HIGH ASSET CANDIDATES WHO HAVE NOT FILED INCOME TAX RETURNS (ITR) .................................................................. 40

DETAILS OF CANDIDATES BASED ON INCOME TAX DECLARATION -PARTY-WISE ......................................................................... 40

TOP 10CANDIDATES WHO DECLARED THE HIGHEST INCOME IN INCOME TAX RETURNS (ITR) ...................................................... 41

NUMBER OF CANDIDATES WHO HAVE PAID TAXYEAR-WISE ................................................................................................ 42

DETAILS OF CANDIDATES WHO HAVE NOT DECLARED THEIR PAN ........................................................................................... 42

CROREPATI CANDIDATESPANNOT GIVEN ...................................................................................................................... 42

ANALYSIS BASED ON EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND OF CANDIDATES .................................................................. 43OVERALL EDUCATION REPORT -CANDIDATES ..................................................................................................................... 43

EDUCATION ANALYSIS OF CANDIDATES-PARTY-WISE ............................................................................................................ 43

ANALYSIS BASED ON GENDER CANDIDATES ...................................................................................................... 44WOMENS REPRESENTATION IN THE ASSEMBLY ELECTION .................................................................................................... 44

COMPARISON OF MEN AND WOMEN CANDIDATES IN 2011AND 2006ELECTIONS .................................................................... 44

ANALYSIS BASED ON AGE CANDIDATES ............................................................................................................ 45ANALYSIS BASED ON AGE GROUPSCANDIDATES................................................................................................................. 45

AGE ANALYSIS OF CANDIDATES-PARTY-WISE ..................................................................................................................... 45

ANALYSIS OF RE-CONTESTING MLAS.................................................................................................................... 46SUMMARY OF ASSET COMPARISON OF RE-CONTESTING MLAS ............................................................................................... 46

AVERAGE ASSET INCREASE FOR RE-CONTESTING MLAS-PARTY-WISE....................................................................................... 46

ASSET COMPARISON OF RE-CONTESTING MLAS .................................................................................................................. 47

FULL DETAILS OF PENDING CRIMINAL CASES ON MLAS OF WEST BENGAL ASSEMBLY ELECTIONS, 2011 .............. 61FULL ASSET DETAILS OF MLAS OF WEST BENGAL ASSEMBLY ELECTIONS, 2011 .................................................... 88LIST OF SERIOUS IPC SECTIONS CONSIDERED FOR THIS REPORT .......................................................................... 99DISCLAIMER ....................................................................................................................................................... 102


7/116



vii

Selected MediaCoverage of

NEW/ADR reports


8/116



viii


9/116



ix


10/116



x


11/116



xi


12/116



1

West Bengal 2011 Assembly Elections

West Bengal Assembly Elections, 2011 was held during the months of April-May, 2011. A total of

1792candidates contested in the West Bengal State Assembly Elections and out of which, West Bengal

Election Watch (WBEW) & Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) have analyzed the data of 1306

candidates. This report includes the analysis of criminal, financial, educational and other details of 1306

candidates and 294 MLAs. Information provided by the Election Commission of India and details

from the affidavits filed by the candidates have been used for the analysis.

Representation of political parties

In West Bengal 2006 Assembly Elections, 34 political parties contested, which increased to 56 in West

Bengal 2011 Assembly Elections. This reflects an increase of 61% in the number of political parties

contested the election from West Bengal 2006 Assembly Elections to West Bengal 2011 Assembly

Elections.

Growth in number of candidates

Out of 1792 candidates contested in 2011 Assembly Elections, there were 1618 (90%) men and 174

(10%) were women candidates. In 2006, out of 1654 candidates contested, 1515 were men (92%) while

139 (8%) were women. Hence, the percentage of women candidates has increased by 2% from 2006

Assembly Elections to 2011 Assembly Elections.

Executive summary of MLAs and Candidates

Summary of MLAs

Affidavits of all 294 MLAs were analyzed by West Bengal Election Watch (WBEW).

Out of 294 MLAs analyzed, 102 (35%) have pending criminal cases against them. Comparing this to

West Bengal 2006 Assembly Elections, out of 283 MLAs analyzed, 45 (16%) had pending criminal

cases against them.

Out of these 102 (35%) MLAs with pending criminal cases, there are serious criminal cases pending

against 75 MLAs (26%). Comparing this with West Bengal 2006 Assembly, there were 45 MLAs with

pending criminal cases, out of which 30 MLAs (11%) had serious pending criminal cases againstthem.

Out of 102 MLAs with pending criminal cases in West Bengal 2011 Assembly, 69 MLAs are from

AITC, 17 from INC, 7 from CPI(M), 4 from AIFB, 3 from GJM , 1 from RSP and 1 is an Independent

MLA .

There were a total of 245 IPC charges of heinous nature against the MLAs. These include murder,

attempt to murder, robbery, kidnapping, extortion, etc.


13/116



2

The number of crorepati MLAs has increased from 7 (2%) in West Bengal 2006 Assembly Elections to

47 (16%) in West Bengal 2011 Assembly Elections.

Out of 47 crorepati MLAs in West Bengal 2011 Assembly, 37 are from AITC, 7 are from INC and 1

each are from RSP, DSP (PC) and AIFB.

Among major parties, the average asset per MLA for AITC is Rs. 85 lakhs, for INC it is Rs 62.85 lakhs,for AIFB it is Rs. 43.69 lakhs and for CPI (M) it is Rs. 16.93 lakhs.

Average asset for a MLA from West Bengal is Rs 68 lakhs.

Out of 294 MLAs analyzed, 49 had not declared their PAN details.

A total of 97 MLAs (33%) out of 294 MLAs analyzed have declared that they have never filed Income

Tax Returns.

Out of the above 97 MLAs who have never filed ITR, 47 have not even given their PAN details.

Out of 174 women candidates contested, only 34 won. Hence only 12% of MLAs in current West

Bengal Assembly are women.

More than 65% candidates (191 of 294 analyzed) are graduates & above.

4 MLAs out of the 294 analyzed have declared their age to be less than 30 years while 13 MLAs have

declared their age more than 71 years. 65 candidates out of the 1306 analyzed have declared their age to be less than 30 years while 30

candidates have declared age more than 71 years.

Summary of candidates

West Bengal Election Watch (WBEW) has analyzed affidavits of 1306 candidates out of 1792

candidates who contested in 2011 Assembly Elections.

Out of these 1306 candidates analyzed, 275 candidates (21%) declared pending criminal cases

against them. AITC had 82 out of 226 (36%) candidates with pending criminal cases, BJP had 58 out

of 288 (20%), CPI (M) had 38 out of 213 (18%) and INC had 28 out of 66 (42%) candidates with

pending criminal cases against them. Out of these 275 candidates with pending criminal cases, 178 (14%) out of the total candidates

analyzed had pending serious criminal cases like murder, attempt to murder, kidnapping, robbery,

extortion etc. against them.

All major parties have given tickets to candidates with pending criminal cases, INC 42%, AITC

36%, BJP20% and CPI (M)18%.

There were a total of 13 red alert constituencies (i.e. where 3 or more contesting candidates had

pending criminal cases). Jalangi, Baghmundi and Kalchini (ST)each had 4 candidates with pending

criminal cases.

A total of 73 candidates out of 1306 analyzed i.e. 6% were crorepati.

A total of 10 candidates out of 1306 analyzed declared zero assets.

A total of 29 candidates out of 1306 analyzed declared liabilities above 20 lakhs. Among major parties, the average asset per candidate for AITC was 75.36 lakhs, for INC was 48.39

lakhs, for CPI (M) was 29.81 lakhs, for BJP was 20.99 lakhs and for BSP was 8.43 lakhs.

31% of candidates (405 of 1306 analyzed) had not furnished their PAN card details.

A total of 671 candidates (51%) out of 1306 candidates analyzed have declared that they have never

filed Income Tax returns (ITR).

Out of the above 671 candidates analyzed who have never filed ITR, 400 have not even given their

PAN details.


14/116



3

More than 52% candidates (679 of 1306 analyzed) were graduates & above.

Number of women candidates was just 174 (10%) as compared to 1618 (90%) of men.

Analysis based on pending criminal cases

Analysis based on pending criminal casesMLAs

WBEW has analyzed affidavits of all 294 MLAs. 102 MLAs out of these 294 MLAs from West Bengal

Assembly, 2011 have pending criminal cases against them, and 75 MLAs out of 102 MLAs have serious

criminal cases pending against them. Comparing this with West Bengal Assembly Elections 2006, 30

MLAs had serious criminal cases pending against them.

Party- wise break up of MLAs with pending criminal cases

Out of total 102 MLAs with pending criminal cases, 69 MLAs are from AITC, 17 from INC and 7 from

CPI(M). The party-wise break-up of MLAs is given below:

PartyTotal number of MLAs

analyzed

MLAs with pending criminal

cases

% of MLAs with

pending criminal cases

No. of MLAs with

serious pending criminal

cases

% of MLAs with serious

pending criminal cases

AITC 184 69 38 % 51 28 %

INC 42 17 41 % 11 26 %

CPI(M) 40 7 18 % 4 10 %

AIFB 11 4 36 % 4 36 %

RSP 7 1 14 % 1 14 %

GJM 4 3 75 % 3 75 %

IND 1 1 100% 1 100 %

Total 102 35% 75 26%

Table: MLAs with pending criminal cases- Party wise

Serious crimes distribution for major parties-MLAs

There are several cases of violent crimes like murder, attempt to murder, theft, extortion, robbery etc

pending against MLAs in West Bengal 2011 Assembly Elections. The table below gives a summary of all

serious violent offences related to murder, kidnapping, extortion, theft, robbery and dacoity. As can be

seen from the table MLAs of AITC has 171 serious IPC counts against them, while MLAs from INC have 31

and AIFBs MLAs have 19 serious IPC counts against them.

IPC/Party IPC Description AITC INC AIFB GJM CPI(M) IND RSP Total

121

Waging, or attempting to wage war, or abetting waging of war, against the Government

of India 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

121A Conspiracy to commit offences punishable by section 121 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

123 Concealing with intent to facilitate design to wage war 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

124Assaulting President, Governor, etc., with intent to compel or restrain the exercise of any

lawful power1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

177 Furnishing false information 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

181False statement on oath or affirmation to public servant or person authorized to

administer an oath or affirmation0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

193 false evidence 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1


15/116



4

IPC/Party IPC Description AITC INC AIFB GJM CPI(M) IND RSP Total

237 Import or export of counterfeit coin 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

294 Obscene acts and songs 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

302 Murder 10 1 2 0 1 2 0 16

307 Attempt to murder 28 6 5 1 1 2 1 44

308 Attempt to commit culpable homicide 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 3

324 Voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons or means 13 1 2 0 1 0 0 17

325 voluntarily causing grievous hurt 43 7 1 3 0 2 0 56

326 Voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons or means 18 6 3 1 1 2 1 32

363 Kidnapping 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 4

364 Kidnapping or abducting in order to murder 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 3

365 Kidnapping or abducting with intent secretly and wrongfully to confine person 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 3

379 Theft 30 3 4 0 3 0 0 40

380 Theft in dwelling house, etc. 10 0 1 1 0 0 0 12

382Theft after preparation made for causing death, hurt or restraint in order to the

committing of the theft1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2

384 Extortion 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 4

Total 171 31 19 6 7 9 2 245 /245

Table: Serious IPC breakup for major parties

Party -wise comparison of pending criminal cases on MLAs in West Bengal

Assembly Elections, 2006 and 2011

The table given below shows a comparison between the number of MLAs with pending criminal cases

party- wise in both Assembly Elections 2006 and 2011. The number of MLAs with pending criminal cases

has increased for all most all parties in the 2011 West Bengal Assembly Elections as compared to 2006

Assembly Elections.

Party

West Bengal 2011 Assembly Elections West Bengal 2006 Assembly Elections

Total

MLAs analyzed

MLAs with

pending

criminal

cases

% of MLAs

with

pending

criminal

cases

MLAs

with

serious

pending

criminal

cases

% of

MLAs

with

serious

pending

criminal

cases

Total

MLAs

analyzed

MLAs

with

pending

criminal

case

% of

MLAs

with

criminal

cases

MLAs

with

serious

pending

criminal

case

% of

MLAs

with

seriou

pendin

crimina

cases

CPI(M) 40 7 18% 4 10% 174 20 11% 15 9%

AITC 184 69 38% 51 28% 27 8 30% 4 15%

INC 42 17 41% 11 26% 20 6 30% 4 20%

AIFB 11 4 36% 4 36% 21 2 10% 1 5%

RSP 7 1 14% 1 14% 19 3 16% 2 11%

OTHER

PARTIES10 4 40% 4 40% 22 6 27% 4 18%

Total 294 102 35% 75 26% 283 45 16% 30 11%

Table: Party wise comparison of MLAs with pending criminal casesWest Bengal Assembly Elections, 2006 vs 2011


16/116



5

Top 20 MLAs with most serious pending criminal cases

The table given below gives a list top 20 MLAs who have serious pending criminal cases like murder,

attempt of murder, extortion, kidnapping, dacoity etc. against them.

S.No Name District Constituency Party Serious IPCCounts

Total No.of Cases

Brief Details of serious IPC Counts

1SEKH

SAHONAWEZBARDHAMAN KETUGRAM AITC 24 17

2 charges related to Murder(IPC section-302)

3 charges related to Attempt to murder(IPC section-3

1 charges related to Kidnapping or abducting in orde

murder(IPC section-364)

5 charges related to Theft in dwelling house, etc.(IPC

section-380)

5 charges related to Voluntarily causing grievous hur

dangerous weapons or means(IPC section-326), etc.

2BECHARAM

MANNAHOOGHLY HARIPAL AITC 13 22


4 charges related to voluntarily causing grievous hur

section-325), etc.

3 Arjun SinghNORTH 24

PARGANASBHATPARA AITC 10 14


1 charges related to Attempt to commit culpable

homicide(IPC section-308)


section-325)

1 charges related to theft(IPC section-379)

1 charges related to extortion(IPC section-384), etc.

4Biswanath

KarakHOOGHLY GOGHAT (SC) AIFB 10 7




dangerous weapons or means(IPC section-326)

3 charges related to theft(IPC section-379) , etc.

5 HAMIDULRAHAMAN

UTTAR DINAJPUR CHOPRA IND 9 4



1 charges related to Kidnapping or abducting in ordemurder(IPC section-364)

2 charges related to voluntarily causing grievous hurt

section-325), etc.

6Radhakanta

MaitiPASCHIM MEDINIPUR DEBRA AITC 8 6





section-325), etc.

7SAMIR

KUMAR JANASOUTH 24 PARGANAS PATHARPRATIMA AITC 8 4




1 charges related to extortion(IPC section-384)

1 charges related to theft(IPC section-379), etc.

8 Akhil Giri PURBOMEDINIPUR RAMNAGAR AITC 7 12


section-325)


2 charges related to Theft in dwelling house, etc.(IPC

section-380)

9HUMAYUN

KABIRMURSHIDABAD REJINAGAR INC 7 6




1 charges related to kidnapping(IPC section-363)


17/116



6

S.No Name District Constituency PartySerious IPC

Counts

Total No.

of CasesBrief Details of serious IPC Counts


homicide(IPC section-308), etc.

10 MD. SOHRABALI

BARDHAMAN RANIGANJ AITC 7 6


2 charges related to Voluntarily causing grievous hurdangerous weapons or means(IPC section-326)


11SUSHIL

BISWASNADIA KRISHNAGANJ (SC) AITC 6 9


1 charges related to Voluntarily causing hurt by



12MOLOY

GHATAKBARDHAMAN ASANSOL UTTAR AITC 6 6


1 charges related to kidnapping(IPC section-363)



dangerous weapons or means(IPC section-326), etc.

13Srikanta

MahataPASCHIM MEDINIPUR SALBONI AITC 5 2

1 charges related to Waging, or attempting to wage w

or abetting waging of war, against the Government o

India(IPC section-121)

1 charges related to Conspiracy to commit offences

punishable by section 121(IPC section-121A)

1 charges related to Assaulting President, Governor,

with intent to compel or restrain the exercise of any

lawful power(IPC section-124) etc.

14Wilson

ChampramaryJALPAIGURI KALCHINI (ST) GJM 4 6



section-325), etc.

15Ali Imran

RamzUTTAR DINAJPUR CHAKULIA AIFB 4 3


1 charges related to extortion(IPC section-384)


1 charges related to Voluntarily causing hurt by


16UDAYAN

GUHACOOCHBEHAR DINHATA AIFB 4 3

1 charge related to Murder(IPC section-302)

1 charge related to Attempt to murder(IPC section-3

1 charge related to Voluntarily causing grievous hurt

dangerous weapons or means (IPC section-326), etc.

17DIPAK KUMAR

HALDERSOUTH 24 PARGANAS DIAMOND HARBOUR AITC 4 3


section-325)


homicide(IPC section-308), etc.

18Banamali

HazraBARDHAMAN BHATAR AITC 4 2



(IPC section-325), etc.

19APURBA

SARKARMURSHIDABAD KANDI INC 4 2



section-325)

1 charges related to False statement on oath or

affirmation to public servant or person authorized to

administer an oath or affirmation(IPC section-181)

20RABINDRA

NATH GHOSHCOOCHBEHAR NATABARI AITC 4 1


section-325)


Table: List of top 20 MLAs with serious pending criminal cases


18/116



7

Analysis based on assets- MLAs

Crorepati MLAs- Party wise break upOut of 294 affidavits analyzed for MLAs in West Bengal 2011 Assembly Elections, 47 (16%) are crorepati.

20% MLAs of AITC are crorepati while more that 17% of INC MLAs are crorepati.

Party Total MLAs analyzed Crorepati MLAs % of crorepati MLAs

AITC 184 37 20%

INC 42 7 17%

RSP 7 1 14%

DSP(PC) 1 1 100%

AIFB 11 1 9%

OTHER 49 0 0

Total 294 47 16%

Table: Crorepati MLAsparty-wise

Average assets per MLA for major parties

The table below provides the average asset per MLA, party-wise. The maximum average asset of an

AITC MLA is 85.50 lakhs followed by an INC MLA with 62.85. An AIFB MLA has 43.69 lakhs and CPI (M)

MLA has an average asset of approx 16.93 lakhs.

Party MLAs Analyzed Average Assets

AITC 184Rs 85,50,108

~ 85 Lacs+

INC 42Rs 62,85,573

~ 62 Lacs+

CPI(M) 40Rs 16,93,016

~ 16 Lacs+

AIFB 11Rs 43,69,702

~ 43 Lacs+

RSP 7Rs 33,34,315

~ 33 Lacs+

GJM 4Rs 28,31,609

~ 28 Lacs+

CPI 2Rs 13,41,469

~ 13 Lacs+

SUCI 1Rs 11,13,648

~ 11 Lacs+

SP 1Rs 9,87,247

~ 9 Lacs+

All parties 294Rs. 68,18,756

68 lacs +

Table: Average Assets per MLA party wie


19/116



8

Top 20 MLAs with high assets

Among MLAs with maximum assets,Swapan Kanti Ghosh (AITC) from Suri Constituency tops the list with

12 crores followed byNure Alam Chowdhury (INC) with 9 crores. The table below gives the top 20 MLAs

with maximum assets.

S.No Name District Constituency Party Movable Assets (Rs) Immovable Assets (Rs) Total Assets (Rs)

1 Swapan Kanti Ghosh BIRBHUM SURI AITC 8,96,33,670 3,05,10,000 12,01,43,67012 Crore+

2 Nure Alam Chowdhury BIRBHUM MURARAI AITC 1,73,50,000* 7,50,00,000* 9,23,50,0009 Crore+

3 Kasturi DasSOUTH 24

PARGANASMAHESHTALA AITC 38,55,504 6,80,00,000 7,18,55,504

7 Crore+

4 Iqbal ahmed HOOGHLY KHANAKUL AITC 1,06,54,113 6,03,07,500 7,09,61,6137 Crore+

5 Amit Kumar MitraNORTH 24

PARGANASKHARDAHA AITC 3,25,22,994 3,83,53,322

7,08,76,3167 Crore+

6 HAIDER AZIZ SAFWI HOWRAHULUBERIA

PURBAAITC 1,36,49,286 3,97,93,750 5,34,43,036

5 Crore+

7 Abhijit Mukherjee BIRBHUM NALHATI INC 1,48,73,243 3,44,64,248 4,93,37,4914 Crore+

8 Sovan ChatterjeeSOUTH 24

PARGANAS

BEHALA

PURBAAITC 62,37,795 4,16,90,315 4,79,28,110

4 Crore+

9 EMANI BISWAS MURSHIDABAD SUTI INC 2,16,60,753 1,95,24,6404,11,85,393

4 Crore+

10 MANISH GUPTASOUTH 24

PARGANASJADAVPUR AITC 2,61,86,298 1,32,86,750 3,94,73,048

3 Crore+

11 FIRHAD HAKIM KOLKATA SOUTH KOKATA PORT AITC 2,04,60,088 1,73,20,0003,77,80,088

3 Crore+

12 SHASHI PANJA KOLKATA NORTH SHYAMPUKUR AITC 2,76,91,602 96,68,308 3,73,59,9103 Crore+

13 APURBA MUKHERJEE BARDHAMANDURGAPUR

PASCHIMAITC 52,42,564 2,88,95,400 3,41,37,964

3 Crore+

14 SUDIPTA ROY HOOGHLY SREERAMPUR AITC 26,51,423 2,86,00,000 3,12,51,4233 Crore+

15 MD. SOHRAB ALI BARDHAMAN RANIGANJ AITC 92,90,329 2,12,73,570 3,05,63,8993 Crore+

16 SULTAN SINGH HOWRAH BALLY AITC 2,11,59,550 52,32,750 2,63,92,3002 Crore+

17 SWARNA KAMAL SAHA KOLKATA NORTH ENTALLY AITC 2,03,83,084 52,00,000 2,55,83,0842 Crore+

18 GULSAN MULLICK HOWRAH PANCHLA AITC 19,05,862 2,36,20,282 2,55,26,1442 Crore+

19 Dr. Nikhil Kr. Banerjee BARDHAMANDURGAPUR

PURBAAITC 56,28,276 1,90,50,000 2,46,78,276

2 Crore+

20 SADHAN PANDE KOLKATA NORTH MANIKTALA AITC 1,32,41,356 1,01,57,500 2,33,98,8562 Crore+

Note: * Total assets given above for 2011 is the total provided by the candidates in the affidavits. Where they have failed toprovide the total we have calculated it from the details provided in the affidavit.

Table: Top 20 MLAs with high assets
http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=376http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=405http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=376http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=405http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=709http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=956http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=641http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=871http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=402http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=703http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=272http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=696http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=788http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=778http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1163http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=906http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1169http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=845http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=770http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=867http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1160http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=782http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=782http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1160http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=867http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=770http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=845http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1169http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=906http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1163http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=778http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=788http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=696http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=272http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=703http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=402http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=871http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=641http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=956http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=709http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=405http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=376http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=405http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=376


20/116



9

Top 10 MLAs with low assets

Given below is the list of top 10 MLAs with low assets from West Bengal 2011 Assembly Elections.

S.No Name District Constituency Party Movable Assets (Rs) Immovable Assets (Rs) Total Assets (

1 Gouranga Chatterjee BARDHAMAN PANDABESWAR CPI(M) 6,677 30,00036,677

36 Thou+

2 Nabin Chandra Bag BARDHAMAN KHANDAGHOSH (SC) CPI(M) 34,015 20,00054,015

54 Thou+

3 PUNDARIKAKSHYA SAHA NADIA NABADWIP AITC 56,905 056,905

56 Thou+

4 ASIMA PATRA HOOGHLY DHANEKHALI (SC) AITC 57,000 057,000

57 Thou+

5 DULAL MURMUPASCHIM

MEDINIPURNAYAGRAM (ST) AITC 84,079 20,000

1,04,079

1 Lacs+

6 Rukbanur Rahman NADIA CHAPRA AITC 1,16,887 01,16,887

1 Lacs+

7 BULU CHIK BARAIK JALPAIGURI MAL (ST) CPI(M) 1,19,867 01,19,867

1 Lacs+

8 Soumitra Khan BANKURA KATULPUR (SC) INC 1,32,000* 0

1,32,000

1 Lacs+

9 MANTURAM PAKHIRASOUTH 24

PARGANASKAKDWIP AITC 35,513 1,00,000

1,35,513

1 Lacs+

10 Sri Basudev Mete BARDHAMAN AUSGRAM (SC) CPI(M) 98,979 72,0001,70,979

1 Lacs+

Note: * Total assets given above for 2011 is the total provided by the candidates in the affidavits. Where they have failed to

provide the total we have calculated it from the details provided in the affidavit.

Table: Top 10 MLAs with low assets

Top 10 MLAs with highest liabilitiesFollowing is the list of top 10 MLAs with highest liabilities:-

S. No. Name District Constituency Party Liabilities (Rs)

1 Swapan Kanti Ghosh BIRBHUM SURI AITC 1,18,60,714 1 crore+

2SAMIR KUMAR

PODDARNADIA

RANAGHAT UTTAR

PURBA (SC)AITC

73,81,678 73 Lacs+

3 Abhijit Mukherjee BIRBHUM NALHATI INC 57,90,000 57 lacs+

4 MD. SOHRAB ALI BARDHAMAN RANIGANJ AITC 55,47,500 55 Lacs+

5 FIRHAD HAKIM KOLKATA SOUTH KOKATA PORT AITC 53,99,000 53 Lacs+

6 Kasturi Das SOUTH 24

PARGANASMAHESHTALA AITC 50,31,231 50 Lacs+

7 EMANI BISWAS MURSHIDABAD SUTI INC 44,89,378 44 Lacs+

8 Iqbal ahmed HOOGHLY KHANAKUL AITC 41,65,330 41 Lacs+

9 HUMAYUN KABIR MURSHIDABAD REJINAGAR INC 34,00,000 34 Lacs+

10 SULTAN SINGH HOWRAH BALLY AITC 32,00,000 32 Lacs+
http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1157http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1148http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=344http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=939http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1235http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=352http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=47http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1137http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=734http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1052http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/affidavit/candidate.php?candidate_id=376http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/affidavit/candidate.php?candidate_id=376http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/affidavit/candidate.php?candidate_id=330http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/affidavit/candidate.php?candidate_id=330http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/affidavit/candidate.php?candidate_id=330http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/affidavit/candidate.php?candidate_id=402http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/affidavit/candidate.php?candidate_id=402http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/affidavit/candidate.php?candidate_id=1169http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/affidavit/candidate.php?candidate_id=1169http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/affidavit/candidate.php?candidate_id=788http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/affidavit/candidate.php?candidate_id=788http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/affidavit/candidate.php?candidate_id=709http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/affidavit/candidate.php?candidate_id=709http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/affidavit/candidate.php?candidate_id=272http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/affidavit/candidate.php?candidate_id=272http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/affidavit/candidate.php?candidate_id=956http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/affidavit/candidate.php?candidate_id=956http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/affidavit/candidate.php?candidate_id=303http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/affidavit/candidate.php?candidate_id=303http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/affidavit/candidate.php?candidate_id=845http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/affidavit/candidate.php?candidate_id=845http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/affidavit/candidate.php?candidate_id=845http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/affidavit/candidate.php?candidate_id=303http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/affidavit/candidate.php?candidate_id=956http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/affidavit/candidate.php?candidate_id=272http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/affidavit/candidate.php?candidate_id=709http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/affidavit/candidate.php?candidate_id=788http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/affidavit/candidate.php?candidate_id=1169http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/affidavit/candidate.php?candidate_id=402http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/affidavit/candidate.php?candidate_id=330http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/affidavit/candidate.php?candidate_id=330http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/affidavit/candidate.php?candidate_id=376http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1052http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=734http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1137http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=47http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=352http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1235http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=939http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=344http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1148http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1157


21/116



10

Note: * Total assets given above for 2011 is the total provided by the MLAs in the affidavits. Where they have failed to provide

the total we have calculated it from the details provided in the affidavit.

Table: Top 10 MLAs with highest liabilities

Crorepati MLAs (2006 vs 2011)Out of 294 MLAs analyzed from West Bengal 2011 Assembly Elections, 47 are crorepati as compared to

7 crorepati MLAs in West Bengal 2006 Assembly Election. Hence there has been an increase of 571% in

the number of crorepati MLAs from Assembly Elections, 2006.

West Bengal 2006 Assembly Elections West Bengal 2011 Assembly Election

Party

Total MLAs

analyzed

Total Crorepati

MLAs

% of crorepati

MLA

Total MLAs

analyzed

Total crorepati

MLAs % of crorepati MLAs

AITC 27 1 4% 184 37 20%

INC 20 3 15% 42 7 17%

OTHER 236 3 1% 68 3 4%

Total 283 7 2% 294 47 16%

Table: Comparison Assembly Elections 2006 and 2011 based on assets

Chances of winning based on assets

As can be seen from the table below, higher the assets more are the chances of winning for a candidate.

In the West Bengal 2011 Assembly Election, 86% of the candidates who declared assets more than 5

crore and above won. On the other hand only 10% of candidates with assets less than 10 lakh won. The

election results seemed to be highly influenced by the money power of candidates.

Value of assets No of candidates No of Winners % of Winners

5 cr and above 7 6 86%

2 crores to 5 crores 24 16 67%

50 lakhs to 2 crores 144 68 47%

10 lakhs to 50 lakhs 515 140 27%

less than 10 lakhs 616 64 10%

Table: Chances of winning based on assets

Asset position in constituency among candidates and chances of winning

The following table gives an analysis of asset position in constituency among candidates (highest asset

to lowest asset) and their chances of winning. From 139 i.e. 47% constituencies, candidates with highest

declared assets according to their own self sworn affidavits emerged as MLAs. While from 32%

constituencies candidates with second highest declared assets won. The number of MLAs kept

decreasing according to their asset position in the constituency as per their self declared affidavits.

Position in constituency based on assets Total Winners % of Winners Average Assets

1 139 47 %1,22,41,305

1 Crore+

2 93 32 %26,14,085

26 Lacs+

3 45 15 %11,18,377

11 Lacs+
http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/admin/reports2.php?action=report&doe=All&rank=1&gender=All&handler=AssetRankListOfWinning&a_rank=1http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/admin/reports2.php?action=report&doe=All&rank=1&gender=All&handler=AssetRankListOfWinning&a_rank=2http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/admin/reports2.php?action=report&doe=All&rank=1&gender=All&handler=AssetRankListOfWinning&a_rank=3http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/admin/reports2.php?action=report&doe=All&rank=1&gender=All&handler=AssetRankListOfWinning&a_rank=3http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/admin/reports2.php?action=report&doe=All&rank=1&gender=All&handler=AssetRankListOfWinning&a_rank=2http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/admin/reports2.php?action=report&doe=All&rank=1&gender=All&handler=AssetRankListOfWinning&a_rank=1


22/116



11

Position in constituency based on assets Total Winners % of Winners Average Assets

4 13 4 %6,16,226

6 Lacs+

5 4 1 %4,31,247

4 Lacs+

Grand Total 294 100 % 68,18,75568 Lacs+

Table: Asset position in constituency among candidates and their chances of winning

Analysis based on Income Tax and PAN details of MLAs

Top 10 MLAs with high assets who have not filed ITR

Out of 294 MLAs analyzed, 97 MLAs (33%) have not filed ITR. Among them,Jiban Mukhopadhyay of AITC

has the highest assets of approximately 1.82 crore followed by Abdur Rahim Boxi of RSP with assets

worth over 1 crores. Details of top 10 MLAs with high assets but not filed ITR are as follows:-

S.No Name District Constituency PartyMovable Assets

(Rs)

Immovable Assets

(Rs)Total Assets (Rs) PAN G

1 JIBAN MUKHOPADHYAY SOUTH 24 PARGANASSONARPUR

DAKSHINAITC 1,56,26,222 26,33,648 1,82,59,8701 Crore+ Y

2 Abdur Rahim Boxi MALDA MALATIPUR RSP 24,15,420 77,02,332 1,01,17,7521 Crore+ Y

3 FIRDOUSI BEGUM SOUTH 24 PARGANASSONARPUR

UTTARAITC 36,97,476 34,21,324 71,18,80071 Lacs+ Y

4 ABDUR RAZZAK MOLLA SOUTH 24 PARGANASCANNING

PURBACPI(M) 7,27,373 53,00,000 60,27,37360 Lacs+ Y

5 SUNIL CHANDRA TIRKEY DARJEELINGPHANSIDEWA

(ST)INC 30,85,008 23,00,000 53,85,00853 Lacs+ Y

6 SANDHYARANI TUDU PURULIA MANBAZAR (ST) AITC 19,22,588 30,72,538 49,95,12649 Lacs+ N

7 AKSHAY THAKUR COOCHBEHAR COOCHBEHARDAKSHIN

AIFB 25,76,944 23,00,000 48,76,94448 Lacs+ Y

8Chowdhury Md

HedayatullahBARDHAMAN MONTESWAR CPI(M) 3,30,455 41,68,000 44,98,45544 Lacs+ N

9 Asif Mehbub MALDA CHANCHAL INC 2,56,153 39,00,000 41,56,15341 Lacs+ N

10 Kashinath Mishra BANKURA BANKURA AITC 21,45,710 16,00,000 37,45,71037 Lacs+ Y


provide the total we have calculated it from the details provided in the affidavit.

Table: Top 10 MLAs with high assets who have not filed ITR

No. of MLAs based on Income Tax declaration - party-wise

In West Bengal, among major parties, AITC has the maximum number of MLAs - 46 (i.e. 25% of the 184

MLAs analyzed) who have never filed ITR and INC who has 11 MLAs (26 % of the 42 MLAs analyzed) who

have never filed ITR.

Party Total MLAs AnalyzedTotal MLAs who have

filed ITR

Total MLAs who have

not filed ITR

% of MLAs who have not

filed ITR

AITC 184 138 46 25 %

INC 42 31 11 26 %

CPI(M) 40 12 28 70 %

AIFB 11 6 5 45 %
http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/admin/reports2.php?action=report&doe=All&rank=1&gender=All&handler=AssetRankListOfWinning&a_rank=4http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/admin/reports2.php?action=report&doe=All&rank=1&gender=All&handler=AssetRankListOfWinning&a_rank=5http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=687http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=99http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=687http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=99http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=699http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=757http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=62http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1102http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=15http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1045http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1045http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=96http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1124http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1124http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=96http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1045http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1045http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=15http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1102http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=62http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=757http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=699http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=99http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=687http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=99http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=687http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/admin/reports2.php?action=report&doe=All&rank=1&gender=All&handler=AssetRankListOfWinning&a_rank=5http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/admin/reports2.php?action=report&doe=All&rank=1&gender=All&handler=AssetRankListOfWinning&a_rank=4


23/116



12

Party Total MLAs AnalyzedTotal MLAs who have

filed ITR

Total MLAs who have

not filed ITR

% of MLAs who have not

filed ITR

RSP 7 3 4 57 %

GJM 4 3 1 25 %

CPI 2 1 1 50 %

IND 1 1 0 0 %

SUCI 1 1 0 0 %

SP 1 0 1 100 %

DSP(PC) 1 1 0 0 %

Total 294 197 97 33 %

Table: MLAs who have never filed ITRparty wise

Top 10 MLAs who declared the highest income in Income Tax Returns (ITR)

Given below are the top 10 MLAs with the highest income shown in their ITR which includes the income

shown by their spouse and dependents.

.No. Name Party ConstituencyMovable

AssetImmovable Asset Total Asset

Financial year

for which ITR

filed by

candidate

Total income show

candidate in ITR

(Self+Spouse+Depen

1 Swapan Kanti Ghosh AITC SURI8,96,33,670

8 Crore+3,05,10,000 3 Crore+12,01,43,670 12 Crore+ 2010-2011 57,85,753 57 Lac

2 Amit Kumar Mitra AITC KHARDAHA3,25,22,994

3 Crore+3,83,53,322 3 Crore+ 7,08,76,316 7 Crore+ 2009-2010 48,40,414 48 Lac

3 MANISH GUPTA AITC JADAVPUR2,61,86,298


4 FIRHAD HAKIM AITC KOKATA PORT2,04,60,088


5 EMANI BISWAS INC SUTI 2,16,60,7532 Crore+

1,95,24,640 1 Crore+ 4,11,85,393 4 Crore+ 2009-2010 35,97,700 35 Lac

6 SULTAN SINGH AITC BALLY2,11,59,550

2 Crore+52,32,750 52 Lacs+ 2,63,92,300 2 Crore+ 2010-2011 35,15,328 35 Lac

7Chiranjeet

ChakrabartiAITC BARASAT

1,46,29,326


8 SIKHA CHOWDHURY AITC CHOWRANGEE1,34,99,765


9Nure Alam

ChowdhuryAITC MURARAI

1,73,50,000


10Swapan Kumar

BelthoriyaAITC KASHIPUR

16,99,999

16 Lacs+28,00,000 28 Lacs+ 44,99,999 44 Lacs+ 2010-2011 27,66,731 27 Lac


provide the total we have calculated it from the details provided in the affidavit.Table: Top 10 MLAs who declared highest income in ITR

Number of MLAs who have paid taxyear-wise

The following table gives year wise information about MLAs analyzed by the WBEW who have filed IT

returns. Only 25% of the MLAs analyzed have filed their ITR for Financial Year 2010-2011 while 75% of

the MLAs analyzed have notfiled their IT returns for Financial Year 2010-2011. 97 MLAs (33%) out of the

total 294 analyzed have neverfiled IT returns.
http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=376http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=641http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=696http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=788http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=272http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=845http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=614http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=614http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=766http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=405http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=405http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1104http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1104http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1104http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1104http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=405http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=405http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=766http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=614http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=614http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=845http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=272http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=788http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=696http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=641http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=376


24/116



13

S.No FY for which last return filed Tax payers % of Tax payers

1 2010-2011 73 24.8 %

2 2009-2010 115 39.1 %

3 2008-2009 3 1 %

4 2006-2007 1 0.3 %

5 2005-2006 1 0.3 %

6 Not Given 4 1.4 %

candidates who have never filed taxes 97 33 %

Table: Percentage of Tax payersyear-wise

Details of MLAs who have not declared their PAN

49 out of 294 MLAs analyzed (17%) have not declared their PAN details.

In 2006 West Bengal Assembly elections out of 283 MLAs analyzed 158 (56%) had given their

PAN details while 125 (44%) had not given their PAN details.

Analysis based on Educational background of MLAs

Overall Education Report

A total of 19 (7%) MLAs out of 294 analyzed have only educational qualification equivalent to 8th

standard or below.

A total of 191 (65%) MLAs (out of 294 analyzed) are graduate or with higher educational

qualifications.

Education Group MLAs analyzed

8th Pass 19

10th Pass 32

12th Pass 51

Graduate 75

Graduate Professional 45

Post Graduate 59

Doctorate 12

Others 1

Total 294

Table: Analysis of MLAs on the basis of education

Education analysis of MLAs- party-wise

AITC has 126 MLAs (68%) out of 184 analyzed, who are graduates and above, followed by 27 (64%) MLAs

of INC and 23 MLAs (45%) of CPI(M) who are graduates and above. Party-wise breakup of education

details of MLAs are given below.


25/116



14

Party/Education 8th Pass 10th Pass 12th Pass GraduateGraduate

Professional

Post

GraduateDoctorate Others

Not

GivenTotal

AITC 13 16 29 45 35 38 8 0 0 184

INC 3 4 8 13 5 8 1 0 0 42

CPI(M) 1 8 7 9 3 11 0 1 0 40

AIFB 0 1 5 2 2 1 0 0 0 11

RSP 0 1 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 7

GJM 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 4

DSP(PC) 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1

CPI 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2

SP 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

IND 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

SUCI 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1

Total 19 32 51 75 45 59 12 1 0 294

Table: Education report of MLAs- party- wise

List of MLAs who are PhD Holders

Out of 294 MLAs analyzed in West Bengal 2011 Assembly Elections, there are 12 MLAs who are PhD

holders or with higher educational qualification.

S.No Name Party Constituency Education Education Details

1 ROHIT SHARMA GJM KURSEONG Doctorate MBA, Ph.D.

2 ABU NASAR KHAN CHOUDHURY INC SUJAPUR Doctorate Ph.D.

3 Abul Hasem Mondal AITC MEMARI Doctorate Ph.D., LLB, LLM

4 Amit Kumar Mitra AITC KHARDAHA Doctorate Ph.D in economics

5 ANUP GHOSAL AITC UTTARPARA Doctorate MA (Ph.D)

6 Asish Banerjee AITC RAMPURHAT Doctorate Ph.D.

7 DR. HARKA BAHADUR CHETTRI GJM KALIMPONG Doctorate Ph.D. in Ecology from NBU

8 DR. RAMENDRA NATH BISWAS AITC KALYANI (SC) Doctorate DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY

9 Rabiranjan Chattopadhyay AITCBARDHAMAN

DAKSHINDoctorate Ph.D., M.A.

10 SAUMAN KUMAR MAHAPATRA AITC TAMLUK DoctoratePh.D, F.R.E.S.(FELLOW OF ROYAL SOCIETY OF

ENTOMOLOGY)-LONDON

11 TARUN KANTI NASKAR SUCIJAYNAGAR

(SC)Doctorate Ph.D.From jadavpur

12 UPENDRA NATH BISWAS AITC Bagda Doctorate Ph.D. from University of Calcutta in 1986

Table: MLA with doctorate degree
http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=122http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=111http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1038http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=641http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=902http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=395http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=120http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=322http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1006http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=957http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1286http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=564http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=564http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1286http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=957http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1006http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=322http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=120http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=395http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=902http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=641http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1038http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=111http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=122


26/116



15

Analysis based on Gender - MLAs

Comparison of men and women MLAs in 2011 and 2006 Elections

The percentage of women MLAs remains constant in West Bengal 2011 Assembly compared with West

Bengal 2006 Assembly.

WEST BENGAL 2011 ELECTION WEST BENGAL 2006 ELECTION

Party

Total

MLAs

analyzed

Male

MLAs

% Male

MLAs

Female

MLAs

% Female

MLAs

Total

MLAs

analyzed

Male

MLAs

% Male

MLAs

Female

MLAs

% Female

MLAs

AITC 184 160 87% 24 13% 27 25 93% 2 7%

INC 42 38 90% 4 10% 20 17 85% 3 15%

AIFB 11 11 100% 0 0% 21 19 90% 2 10%

CPI(M) 40 35 88% 5 13% 174 150 86% 24 14%

RSP 7 6 86% 1 14% 19 18 95% 1 5%

Others 10 10 100% 0 0% 22 20 91% 2 9%

Total 294 260 88% 34 12% 283 249 88% 34 12%

Table: Comparison of men and women MLAs in 2011 Elections with 2006 Elections

Analysis Based on Age groupMLAs

A total of 4 MLAs of the 294 analyzed have declared their age to be less than 30 years

A total of 13 MLAs out of the total analyzed are more than 71 years of age.

Age Group Number of MLAs

1-24 0

25-30 4

31-40 29

41-50 64

51-60 127

61-70 57

71-80 12

81-110 1

Total 294

Table: Age analysis of MLAs

Age Analysis of MLAs- party-wise

The following table gives the party wise age analysis of MLAs:-

Party/Age Unknown 25-35 36-45 46-55 56-65 66-75 76+ Total

AITC 0 10 26 58 67 21 2 184

CPI(M) 0 4 6 14 11 4 1 40

INC 0 5 8 10 13 2 4 42

AIFB 0 1 0 6 4 0 0 11

RSP 0 0 1 1 5 0 0 7

GJM 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 4

SP 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1

IND 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1

CPI 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2


27/116



16

Party/Age Unknown 25-35 36-45 46-55 56-65 66-75 76+ Total

SUCI 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1

DSP(PC) 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Total 0 20 42 93 103 29 7 294 / 294

Table: Age analysis of MLAs - party-wise

Analysis of re-elected MLAs

Summary of asset comparison of re-elected MLAs

No. of re-contesting MLAs who won the 2011 Assembly Elections52

The average assets of these MLAs as declared in 2006 is Rs 17,65,278 (17.65 lakhs)

The average assets of these MLAs as declared in 2011 is Rs 38,36,931 (38.36 lakhs)

Average asset growth for these re-elected MLAs is Rs 20,71,653 (20.71 lakhs)

Average percentage growth in assets for these MLAs is 117%

Average asset increase for re-elected MLAs: party-wiseThe table below provides the party-wise average asset increase of re-elected MLAs. Financial details of

17 MLAs of AITC are available from affidavits of 2006 Assembly Elections. These were matched with

available affidavits of 2011 to reveal that the average asset increase for each re-elected MLA of AITC is

Rs.29.77 Lakhs. The same procedure was followed for other parties and it was found that the available

details for 15 re-elected MLAs from CPI(M) show an average asset increase of Rs. 13.37 Lakhs each.

Given below is the detail for all parties who have re-elected MLAs in 2011 West Bengal Assembly:-

S.No.Party in West Bengal

2011

Total Number of

Winners

Average Assets in West

Bengal 2011

Average Assets in West

Bengal 2006

Average Asset

Increase

Average

% Increase in

Asset

1. AITC 17

47,73,965

47 Lacs+

17,96,199

17 Lacs+

29,77,766

29 Lacs+ 166%

2. CPI(M) 1526,82,343

26 Lacs+

13,44,506

13 Lacs+

13,37,837

13 Lacs+100%

3. INC 1154,01,047

54 Lacs+

28,02,571

28 Lacs+

25,98,476

25 Lacs+93%

4. AIFB 431,44,144

31 Lacs+

10,22,993

10 Lacs+

21,21,151

21 Lacs+207%

5. RSP 412,88,139

12 Lacs+

12,79,911

12 Lacs+

8,228

8 Thou+1%

6. SP 19,87,247

9 Lacs+

10,51,592

10 Lacs+-64,345 -6%

TOTAL 5238,36,931

38 Lacs+

17,65,278

17 Lacs+

20,71,653

20 Lacs+117%

Table: Average asset increase of re-elected MLAs-Party wise

Asset comparison for re-elected MLAs

The table below provides the details of asset increase of reelected MLAs. In Rupees, the maximum

growth in assets has been for Apurba Sarkar of INC. His assets have grown by over 1.31 Crore. He is


28/116



17

followed bySadhan Pande of AITC (asset growth of over 1 Crore) andManas Ranjan Bhunia of INC (asset

growth of over 75 lakhs).

In percentage terms, the maximum asset increase is of Kallol Khan of AITC from Nakashipara

constituency. His assets have grown by 6448%. He is followed by Dhiren Bagdi of CPI(M) from Sainthia

(SC) constituency with a growth of 2771% in his assets and Asit Kumar Mal (INC) from Hansan with a

growth of 2556% in his assets.

Please find below comparison of financial details between 2006 and 2011 for 52 reelected MLAs.

S.No. Name

Party in

West

Bengal

2011

District in West

Bengal 2011

Constituency in

West Bengal

2011

Assets in West

Bengal 2011

Assets in West

Bengal 2006Asset Increase

% Increase

Asset

1APURBA

SARKARINC MURSHIDABAD KANDI

1,39,56,850 7,65,762 1,31,91,088

1723%1 Crore+ 7 Lacs+ 1 Crore+

2SADHAN

PANDEAITC

KOLKATA

NORTHMANIKTALA

2,33,98,856 1,28,79,105 1,05,19,75182%

2 Crore+ 1 Crore+ 1 Crore+

3Manas Ranjan

BhuniaINC

PASCHIM

MEDINIPURSABANG

1,98,42,961 1,22,93,607 75,49,35461%

1 Crore+ 1 Crore+ 75 Lacs+

4JYOTI PRIYA

MALLICKAITC

NORTH 24

PARGANASHabra

80,26,444 5,03,841 75,22,6031493%

80 Lacs+ 5 Lacs+ 75 Lacs+

5PARTHA

CHATTERJEEAITC

SOUTH 24

PARGANAS

BEHALA

PASCHIM

69,07,821 8,50,500 60,57,321

712%69 Lacs+ 8 Lacs+ 60 Lacs+

6AROOP

BISWASAITC

SOUTH 24

PARGANASTOLLYGUNJ

75,32,932 16,44,760 58,88,172358%


7

SOBHANDEB

CHATTOPADHYAY

AITC

KOLKATA

SOUTH RASHBEHARI

80,68,204 25,62,518 55,05,686


8MAINUL

HAQUEINC MURSHIDABAD FARAKKA

75,25,000 25,01,400 50,23,600201%


9KHAGEN

MURMUCPI(M) MALDA HABIBPUR (ST)

49,85,423 7,57,001 42,28,422559%


10AKSHAY

THAKURAIFB COOCHBEHAR

COOCHBEHAR

DAKSHIN

48,76,944 7,38,603 41,38,341


11SUBRATA

BAKSHIAITC

KOLKATA

SOUTHBHABANIPORE

69,21,371 29,14,992 40,06,379137%


12 ABU HENA INC MURSHIDABAD LALGOLA60,58,633 24,39,264 36,19,369

148%


13

ABDUR

RAZZAK

MOLLA

CPI(M)SOUTH 24

PARGANAS

CANNING

PURBA

60,27,373 26,64,765 33,62,608


14

Chowdhury

Md

Hedayatullah

CPI(M) BARDHAMAN MONTESWAR

44,98,455 15,24,500 29,73,955


15

ANISUR

RAHAMAN

SARKAR

CPI(M) MURSHIDABAD DOMKAL

56,39,726 31,95,000 24,44,726

http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=199http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1077http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=300http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=300http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=782http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=782http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1077http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1077http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=647http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=647http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=708http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=708http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=701http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=701http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=795http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=795http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=795http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=267http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=267http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=91http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=91http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=15http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=15http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=790http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=790http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=283http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=757http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=757http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=757http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1045http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1045http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1045http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=313http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=313http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=313http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=313http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=313http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=313http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1045http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1045http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1045http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=757http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=757http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=757http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=283http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=790http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=790http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=15http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=15http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=91http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=91http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=267http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=267http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=795http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=795http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=795http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=701http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=701http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=708http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=708http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=647http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=647http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1077http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1077http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=782http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=782http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=300http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=300http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=1077http://ews3.myneta.info/trunk/entryreview/candidate.php?candidate_id=199


29/116



18

S.No. Name

Party in

West

Bengal

2011

District in West

Bengal 2011

Constituency in

West Bengal

2011

Assets in West

Bengal 2011

Assets in West

Bengal 2006Asset Increase

% Increase

Asset

16SITAL KUMAR

SARDARAITC HOWRAH SANKRAIL (SC)

31,43,541 10,34,682 21,08,859204%


17Swapan

DebnathAITC BARDHAMAN

PURBASTHALI

DAKSHIN

23,52,087 3,48,723 20,03,364


18GOKUL

BEHARI ROYAIFB

UTTAR

DINAJPURKARANDIGHI

30,41,353 10,90,193 19,51,160 179%


19 MALA SAHA AITCKOLKATA

NORTH

KASHIPUR-

BELGACHIA

33,16,789 14,15,519 19,01,270134%


20SONALI GUHA

(BOSE)AITC

SOUTH 24

PARGANASSATGACHIA

28,24,199 9,73,979 18,50,220


21Manoranjan

Patra CPI(M) BANKURA TALDANGRA

24,31,536 8,03,507 16,28,029

203%


22ABU TAHER

KHANINC MURSHIDABAD NAODA

48,48,800 33,01,000 15,47,80047%

48 Lacs+ 33

West Bengal Background Report of MLAs&Candidates 2011

Documents

Transcript of West Bengal Background Report of MLAs&Candidates 2011