WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

44
AMS Policy Program WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future Forum on Science Ethics & Policy (FOSEP) William H. Hooke April 25, 2006

description

WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future. Forum on Science Ethics & Policy (FOSEP) William H. Hooke April 25, 2006. A roadmap for this talk. A Policy Primer A “Cliffs- Notes” guide to the future “Making a difference” in Oz. 1. What is policy ?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

Page 1: WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

AMS Policy Program

WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE:scientists, policymaking, and the future

Forum on Science Ethics & Policy (FOSEP)

William H. HookeApril 25, 2006

Page 2: WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

AMS Policy Program

A roadmap for this talk

1. A Policy Primer

2. A “Cliffs- Notes” guide to the future

3. “Making a difference” in Oz

Page 3: WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

AMS Policy Program

1. What is policy?

Page 4: WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

AMS Policy Program

policy:

a definite course or method of action selected from among alternatives and in light of given conditions to guide and determine present and future decisions

Page 5: WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

AMS Policy Program

some familiar examples: • honor your father and mother

• “…the American continents…are henceforth not to be considered as subjects for future colonization by any European powers…”

• dress on Fridays shall be business casual

Page 6: WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

AMS Policy Program

Another example: the steering behavior of “boids”

• separation: avoid crowding...

• alignment: match speed and direction...

• cohesion: move toward the average position…

• ...of local flockmates

Page 7: WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

AMS Policy Program

another example: “Congress shall have the power to…promote the progress of science

and the useful arts”• NSF mission (1950): To promote the progress of science;

to advance the national health, prosperity, and welfare; and to secure the national defense… …support through grants and contracts… award graduate fellowships… foster the interchange of scientific information… evaluate status and needs of the various sciences and

engineering...

Page 8: WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

AMS Policy Program

Scientists in Kansas…the Vannevar Bush policy*

• Curiosity driven• Scientists set priorities• Basic applied

* Science The Endless Frontier: A Report to the President by Vannevar Bush, Director of the Office of Scientific Research and Development, July 1945

Page 9: WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

AMS Policy Program

To be effective… policy must reflect reality:

Gravity – It’s not just a good idea, it’s the LAW!

Page 10: WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

AMS Policy Program

But reality is changing rapidly…

Page 11: WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

AMS Policy Program

Rapid societal change…

…is outpacing our ability to formulate policy

Page 12: WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

AMS Policy Program

2. A “Cliffs Notes” Guide to the Future

Page 13: WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

AMS Policy Program

The human race is on a roll

Page 14: WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

AMS Policy Program

in a short period of time...

• Population growth

• increase in per capita consumption of resources

• advance in technology

Page 15: WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

AMS Policy Program

computation

105 years

103 years

103 years

50 years

Page 16: WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

AMS Policy Program

biotechnology

50 years

1400 years

Page 18: WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

AMS Policy Program

a parenthesis…OK --

So science and technology as a whole are moving

forward...What about advances in

the earth sciences?

Page 19: WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

AMS Policy Program

Throughout history,mankind has operated on three principles...

• assimilative capacity of the atmosphere is infinite

• climate is unchanging

• weather is unpredictable

Page 20: WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

AMS Policy Program

In the span of a century…

…meteorologists have shown...1871-1916 1984-2003

Page 21: WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

AMS Policy Program

Assimilative capacity of the atmosphere is finite...

• Not just locally…

• or regionally…

• but also globally.

Page 22: WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

AMS Policy Program

The climate changes…sometimes abruptly

Page 23: WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

AMS Policy Program

…and weather is more predictable than we’d thought…

                                                                                                            

                                                                             

                                                                                                            

                                                                             

Page 24: WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

AMS Policy Program

in a short period of time?

Short

compared

with what?

Page 25: WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

AMS Policy Program

short compared with what?

• climate variability

• recurrence of extremes

• emergence of unintended consequences

• evidence of non-sustainability

• time required for society to internalize emerging understanding

Page 26: WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

AMS Policy Program

The detailed implications of these trends are uncertain…

…but we can draw broad inferences with a high degree of confidence

Page 27: WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

AMS Policy Program

We can expect a future marked by...

• (adverse) climate variability• natural extremes that will find us

unprepared• pervasive environmental/social

catastrophes• declining margins• ineffective top-down coping

strategies

Page 28: WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

AMS Policy Program

Policy makers will be scrambling

Page 29: WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

AMS Policy Program

3. Making a difference in OZ

Page 30: WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

AMS Policy Program

International Council for Science (ICSU)

• Planning Group on Natural and Human-Induced Hazards and Disasters

• “…research is needed on how to translate research findings about natural hazards and human behavior into policies that are effective in minimizing the human and economic costs of hazards…”

Page 31: WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

AMS Policy Program

These ICSU concerns cut across all fields of science and technology…

• “…three crucial challenges to building scientific capacity…”

• “The first challenge … is the widening gap between advancing scientific knowledge and technology and society’s ability to capture and use them.”

(from ICSU/CSPR Priority Area Assessment

on Capacity Building in Science 2006)

Page 32: WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

AMS Policy Program

ICSU Committee on Scientific Planning and Review

• “closing knowledge gaps will require developing national strategies for science and technology development that are linked with effective policies.”

• “There is a need to build national innovation systems.”

(from ICSU/CSPR Priority Area Assessment

on Capacity Building in Science 2006)

Page 33: WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

AMS Policy Program

The Chinese are moving out…

• At China’s 2006 National Science and Technology Conference, president Hu Jintao pledged to make China an “innovation-oriented society.”

• The Chinese Academy of Sciences is reinventing itself through a “Knowledge Inovation Program.”

Page 34: WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

AMS Policy Program

…the U.S. must follow suit.

• American Competitiveness Initiative

• Rising above the Gathering Storm

Page 35: WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

AMS Policy Program

We must work across a broad front

• Technology transfer

• Decision support systems development

• Rapid prototyping

• Policy framework

• …

Page 36: WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

AMS Policy Program

Policy issues are both specific…

Page 37: WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

AMS Policy Program

deregulate electricity?

Page 38: WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

AMS Policy Program

manage watersheds?

Page 39: WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

AMS Policy Program

urbanize?urbanize?build critical infrastructure?build critical infrastructure?

Page 40: WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

AMS Policy Program

…and general

• Reconcile supply and demand for science

• Harness S&T rather than vice versa

• Order does matter

• Ethics

Page 41: WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

AMS Policy Program

In summary, scientists have much to “offer” OZ …

• Brain

• Courage

• Heart

Page 42: WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

AMS Policy Program

The fall of ancient Athens

• Major earthquakes Sparta 464 B.C. Lamia 426 B.C.

• plague 430 B.C. (killed 1/3 to 2/3 population) returned three times helped lead to Athens’ defeat 404 B.C.

Page 43: WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

AMS Policy Program

But consider this assessment...• “In the end, more than they wanted

freedom, they wanted security. They wanted a comfortable life and they lost it all -- security, comfort, and freedom. When the Athenians finally wanted not to give to society, but for society to give to them, when the freedom they wished most was freedom from responsibility, then Athens ceased to be free.”

-- Edith Hamilton

Page 44: WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE: scientists, policymaking, and the future

AMS Policy Program

• For the past half-century, U.S. scientists have been allowed to work under a rather extraordinary social contract, premised on the notion that "curiosity driven" basic science would open up a cornucopia of social good. Arguably, such an approach has indeed brought many benefits to the humankind since World War II. However, the gap seems to be widening between the advance of science and technology, and society's ability to harness them. As the urgency and complexity of the challenges before us continue to grow, scientists can and should become more engaged in efforts to accelerate the payoff from our work.