WelcomeWhat’s a pilot?

What’s the purpose of the pilot?

• Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about what implementation looks and feels like.

• Improve instructional practices and increase student achievement.

• Establish a clear and consistent evaluation system with a common understanding of effective teaching developed through professional collaboration.

• Establish a professional development system that promotes and ensures a culture of continuous improvement for all.

What will the pilot look like?

• Some similarities with the current system (goal setting, observations, summative conference)

• A new instructional framework, Marzano, with rubrics

• A new summative scoring system• A growth model• Measurement of student growth component

Training goals

• Begin to establish a common language for teaching and learning

• Understand some of the connections between the Teacher & Principal Evaluation systems

• Develop an understanding of the 8 State Criteria

• Develop an understanding of how the components from Marzano’s Framework connect to the 8 State Criteria

Follow up training goals

• Develop a deep understanding of the framework structure and its alignment to the state criteria

• Support staff through the evaluation process• Collect feedback on pilot implementation

Logistics

• Learning together• Summative Scoring Directions from OSPI (December

1, 2012)• Student Growth Component• 4 hours paid today• Future professional development opportunities (Clock

hours)– Monthly meetings– Online learning– TOSA Support

Growth through Learning

Instructional Framework – common language Best practice instruction Collaboration Implementation of the new evaluation system Impact to student learning

A 4-Tiered System

This is a big change in the new system. How does using

a four-tier system change people’s thinking?

Satisfactory

Unsatisfactory

Current System

Unsatisfactory

Basic

Proficient

Distinguished New

SystemN

ew System

The Evolution of TPEP

6696

/589

5

Fix Everythi

ng, Please!PILOT

PILOT

PILOT

PHEW!

• Building the plane while flying it

Principal & Teacher Framework Alignment

• WA is committed to implementing the teacher and principal evaluation system changes simultaneously – most states are only focusing on teachers

• Principals criteria created by AWSP• Teacher criteria created by WEA

Culture Data Content Instruction Community

Centering instruction

on high expectation

sDemonstrating effective

teaching practices

Individualizing

instruction

Subject matter

knowledgeFostering a

safe, positive learning

environment

Use student data to modify

instruction

Communicating with

parents and school

community

Exhibiting collaborativ

e and collegial practices

Creating a culture

Ensuring school safety

Planning with data

Aligning curriculum

Improving instruction

Managing resources

Engaging communitie

s

Closing the gap

Culture Data Content Instruction CommunityTeachers:

“fostering and managing a safe, positive learning environment.” “collaborative and collegial practices focused on improving instructional practice and student learning.”

Principals:

“creating a school culture that promotes the ongoing improvement of learning and teaching for students and staff.” “providing for school safety.”

Teachers Principals

Centering instruction

on high expectation

sDemonstrating effective

teaching practices

Individualizing

instruction

Subject matter

knowledgeFostering a

safe, positive learning

environment

Use student data to modify

instruction

Communicating with

parents and school

community

Exhibiting collaborativ

e and collegial practices

Creating a culture

Ensuring school safety

Planning with data

Aligning curriculum

Improving instruction

Managing resources

Engaging communitie

s

Closing the gap

Culture Data Content Instruction CommunityTeachers:

“using multiple student data elements to modify instruction and improve student learning.”

Principals:

“development, implementation, and evaluation of a data-driven plan for increasing student achievement, including the use of multiple student data elements.”

Teachers Principals

Centering instruction

on high expectation

sDemonstrating effective

teaching practices

Individualizing

instruction

Subject matter

knowledgeFostering a

safe, positive learning

environment

Use student data to modify

instruction

Communicating with

parents and school

community

Exhibiting collaborativ

e and collegial practices

Creating a culture

Ensuring school safety

Planning with data

Aligning curriculum

Improving instruction

Managing resources

Engaging communitie

s

Closing the gap

Culture Data Content Instruction CommunityTeachers:

“providing clear and intentional focus on subject matter content and curriculum.”

Principals:

“assisting instructional staff with alignment of curriculum, instruction, and assessment with state and local district learning goals.”

Teachers Principals

Centering instruction

on high expectation

sDemonstrating effective

teaching practices

Individualizing

instruction

Subject matter

knowledgeFostering a

safe, positive learning

environment

Use student data to modify

instruction

Communicating with

parents and school

community

Exhibiting collaborativ

e and collegial practices

Creating a culture

Ensuring school safety

Planning with data

Aligning curriculum

Improving instruction

Managing resources

Engaging communitie

s

Closing the gap

Culture Data Content Instruction CommunityTeachers:

“implementing the instructional framework.”

Principals:

“monitoring, assisting, and evaluating effective instruction and assessment practices.”

Teachers Principals

Centering instruction

on high expectation

sDemonstrating effective

teaching practices

Individualizing

instruction

Subject matter

knowledgeFostering a

safe, positive learning

environment

Use student data to modify

instruction

Communicating with

parents and school

community

Exhibiting collaborativ

e and collegial practices

Creating a culture

Ensuring school safety

Planning with data

Aligning curriculum

Improving instruction

Managing resources

Engaging communitie

s

Closing the gap

Culture Data Content Instruction CommunityTeachers:

“communicating and collaborating with parents and school community.”

Principals:

“partnering with the school community to promote learning.”

Teachers Principals

An activity to help you connect teacher to principal evaluation…

Principal & Teacher Framework Alignment - Brainstorm

Culture Data Content Instruction Community

• Talk about connections between the work of a teacher and principal within the 5 main themes.

• What kinds of evidence might be used to demonstrate proficiency within these themes?– Teachers– Principals

Washington State Teacher Evaluation with The Marzano Framework

Washington’s 8 Teacher Evaluation Criteria

1. Centering instruction on high expectations for student achievement.

2. Demonstrating effective teaching practices.3. Recognizing individual student learning needs and developing

strategies to address those needs.4. Providing clear and intentional focus on subject matter

content and curriculum.5. Fostering and managing a safe, positive learning

environment.6. Using multiple student data elements to modify instruction

and improve student learning.7. Communicating and collaborating with parents and the school

community.8. Exhibiting collaborative and collegial practices focused on

improving instructional practice and student learning.

8 Teacher Evaluation

Criteria

A Comprehensive Framework for

Effective Instruction

31

2. Demonstrating effective teaching practices.

Component 2.1: Interacting with New Knowledge

Component 2.2: Practicing and Deepening Knowledge

Component 2.3:Organizing Students for Cognitively Complex Tasks

31 Components

An activity to help you connect components to criteria…

Where Do They Fit?Component Sorting

• You have a ziplock bag with colored sentence strips listing the eight WA teacher evaluation criteria and white sentence strips with the 31 components of Marzano’s Framework

• Place the 8 criteria cards on your table and distribute the component strips in your group.

• Read each of your components and under which criterion it fits. Then place it under the correct heading.

• When all the components have been placed, discuss which ones were difficult to place and why.

Checking Your Results

• Now look at the one page titled, Marzano Teacher Evaluation Model at a Glance.

• Compare the groupings to your table’s.• Which component(s) did your group place

differently?• What was your thinking/reasoning? • Can you explain why they were placed in the

Evaluation Model?

Reflection =

Success

Domain 4: Collegiality & Professionalism

Four Domains of the Marzano Teacher Evaluation

Domain 1: Classroom strategies & behaviors

Domain 2: Planning & preparing

Domain 3: Reflecting on teaching

STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT

The 8 Criteria are dispersed across these

domains in the form of the 31 components.

Routine

Content Enacted on the Spot

Domain 2

ClassroomStrategies &

Behaviors

Domain 1

for lessons

and units

...for use of materials & technology

…for special needs of students

Domain 2

Planning & Preparing

Domain 2

Evaluating performance

Reflecting on Teaching

Domain 3Domain 3

Developing & Implementing a professional growth plan

Promoting a positive

environment

Promoting exchange of

ideas and strategies

Collegiality &Professionalism

Promoting district &

school development

Domain 4

The 8 Criteria are dispersed across these

domains in the form of the 31 components.

Evidence of Growth…

…can take many different forms.The pilot will help us develop this.

Reflect…….

Where’s a good place to start?

evalhttp://vimeo.com/46843928

http://tpep-wa.org/resources/eval/sandbox/