WELCOME TO PTV USER GROUP MEETING INDIA 2017

www.ptvgroup.com Seite 1www.ptvgroup.com

WELCOME

WELCOME TO

PTV USER GROUP MEETING INDIA 2017

www.ptvgroup.com Seite 2

WE PLANAND OPTIMISE

EVERYTHINGTHAT MOVES PEOPLE

AND GOODS

WORLDWIDE.


ABOUT PTV GROUP

805EMPLOYEES

ACROSS

THE WORLD

17SUBSIDIARIES

104MILLION EUROS

TURNOVER

ORGANIC GROWTH > 10% P.A.

GLOBAL MARKET LEADER

EUROPE

ON 5 CONTINENTS

ASIA AUSTRALIA NORTH/ LATIN AMERICA

OVER 5,500 CUSTOMERS LOCATED IN

180 COUNTRIES

SERVED FROM 17 SUBSIDIARIES

Fiscal year 15-16

FOUNDED IN 1979

WE DELIVER SOFTWARE, DATA

AND METHODOLOGIES


WE PLAN AND OPTIMISE

EVERYTHING WORLDWIDE WHICH

MOVES PEOPLE AND GOODS.

TRAFFIC & PLANNINGLOGISTICS &

OPERATIONS

REAL-TIME TRAFFIC

MANAGEMENT & ITS


VEHICLE ACTUATED SIGNAL CONTROL

INTRODUCING PTV BALANCE AND PTV EPICS

Entire Priority Intersection Control System - PTV Epics

local optimization of

green time splits, stage sequence

considering coordination

full transit signal priority

optimizes every second


VEHICLE ACTUATED SIGNAL CONTROL

INTRODUCING PTV BALANCE AND PTV EPICS

Balancing Adaptive Network Control Method - PTV Balance

network wide optimization of

green time splits and offsets

optimizing coordination

optimizes every 5 minutes


TRANSPORT MODEL + REAL TIME DATA

OFFLINE

TRANSPORT MODEL REAL-TIME DATA

ONLINE

THE FUSION of transport models capable of PREDICTION WITH THE ONLINE REAL-TIME DATA will

provide INFORMATION ON EXISTING CONDITIONS would create a REAL-TIME PREDICTION

PLATFORM.

DETECTORS

ANPR

FCD

MOBILE PHONE

DATA INPUT DECISION SUPPORT TOOL – LIVE MODEL

DATA FUSION

MODEL UPDATE

REAL-TIME

ROLLING HORIZON

www.ptvgroup.com

ACTIVITIES IN INDIA FOR SMART SIGNALLING

WITH PTV BALANCE AND PTV EPICS

WHO KEEPS CITY’S RHYTHM FLOWING?


CHANDIGARH STUDY SECTION


NETWORK LEVEL SUMMARY PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC BEFORE &

AFTER

Traffic increase by 6% in Network level.

DurationNetwork Peak

Volume - Before

Network Peak

Volume - After

Network

Peak HourIncrease in Traffic

Morning 18788 22173 9.15-10.15 18.0%

Afternoon 18021 18682 13.45-14.45 3.6%

Evening 19143 20885 17.15-18.15 9.1%

Total Network Volume-

Before

Total Network Volume-

AfterIncrease in Traffic (%)

2,06,720 2,19,731 6.3%


RESULT COMPARISON - CHANDIGARH

Travel Time from all the observed journey routes are decreased by 20%

compared to Fixed Time Controller.

0

200

400

600

Junction 32 -Gurudwara

chowk

GurudwaraChowk -

Junction 32

Junction 32 -sector 17

Sector 17 -Junction 32

Sector 16 -SarovarMohali

SarovarMohali -

Sector 16

Jan marg -Sarovar Lake

Sarovar Lake -Jan marg

GurudwaraChowk -

Sector 34

Sector 34 -Gurudwara

Chowk

Tim

e in

sec

Travel Time Comparison-Chandigarh

Fixed Time Epics+Balance

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Junction 32 -Gurudwara

chowk

GurudwaraChowk -

Junction 32

Junction 32 -sector 17

Sector 17 -Junction 32

Sector 16 -Sarovar Mohali

Sarovar Mohali- Sector 16

Jan marg -Sarovar Lake

Sarovar Lake -Jan marg

GurudwaraChowk - Sector

34

Sector 34 -Gurudwara

Chowk

Seconds

Journey Delay-Chandigarh



RESULT COMPARISON -CHANDIGARH

An average queue length is decreased by 50% compared to fixed time signal.

From 96 seconds to 57 sec average network delay is observed from balance model.

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Labour chowk Piccadily Kissan bhavan

Mete

rs

Average Queue Length-Chandigarh


Fixed Time Signal

ControlEpics + Balance

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Delay/Vehicle (Sec)

Se

co

nd

s

Average Network Delay/Vehicle-Chandigarh

Fixed Time Signal Control

Epics + Balance

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

40.0

Speed (KMPH)

Sp

ee

d (

km

ph

)

Average Network Speed-Chandigarh

Overall network speed

has been increased from

28 kmph to 34 kmph.

Improvement of 20%.


PUNE – STUDY AREA


RESULT COMPARISON -PUNE



100

300

500

700

900

Kandujibaba to Karve Road Karve to Kandhujibaba DP to Prabhat Road Garware to Mandir

Tra

vel T

ime in

Seco

nd

s

Travel Time Sections

Travel Time Comparison Results-Pune

Observed Average Simualted Balance

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

Kandujibaba to Karve Road Karve to Kandhujibaba DP to Prabhat Road Garware to Mandir

Seco

nd

s

Average Journey Delay Comparison-Pune

Base Model Balance/Epics

The average journey delay is 32% decreased.


RESULT COMPARISON –PUNE

An average queue length is decreased by 24% compared to base model.

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

KhandujibabaSquare

Prabhat Road SavarkarStatue

Ras Shala SwatantraChowk

Nal Stop Flyover Bridge KarishmaSociety

MrityunjayTemple

Karve Statue

Met

ers

Average Queue Length - Pune

Base Model Balance

Base Model

Balance

0

50

100

150

200

Seco

nd

s

Average Network Delay/Vehicle-Pune

Base Model

Balance

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

Speed (k

mph)

Average Network Speed-Pune


DELHI - STUDY SECTION


RESULT COMPARISON –DELHI



100

300

500

700

Lodhi Hotel -Safdarjung

Safdarjug -Lodhi Hotel

Jor BaghRoad - Race

Course

Race Course- Jor Bagh

Road

Lodhi Garden- INA

INA - LodhiGarden

Flyover -Race Course

Race Course- Flyover

Khan Market- INA

INA - KhanMarket

JLN to RaceCourse

Race Courseto JLN

Tra

vel T

ime in

Seco

nd

s

Travel Time Sections

Travel Time Comparison-Delhi

Fixed Time Observed Simulated Balance Results

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

Safdarjug -Lodhi Hotel

Lodhi Hotel -Safdarjung

Race Course- Jor Bagh

Road

Jor BaghRoad - Race

Course

INA - LodhiGarden

LodhiGarden - INA

Race Course- Flyover

Flyover -Race Course

INA - KhanMarket

Khan Market- INA

Race Courseto JLN

JLN to RaceCourse

Seconds

Average Delay-Delhi

Base Model Balance

The average journey is 45% decreased.


RESULT COMPARISON – AVERAGE QUEUE LENGTH-DELHI

An average queue length is decreased by 37% compared to base model.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Safdarjung Tomb JorBagh Po IHC Dayal SinghCollege

CGO Golf Course

Mete

rs

Average Queue Length-Delhi

Base Model Balance

Base Model

Balance

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

Speed (

km

ph)

Average Network Speed-Delhi

Base Model

Balance

0

20

40

60

80

100

Seconds

Average Network Delay/Vehicle-Delhi


RESULT COMPARISON – FIXED TIME VS BALANCE / EPICS

Parameters Delhi Pune Chandigarh

Travel Time (Sec) ▼ 26% ▼ 32% ▼ 20%

Queue Length (Meters) ▼ 37% ▼ 24% ▼ 50%

Journey Delay (Seconds) ▼ 45% ▼ 32% ▼ 39%

Average Network Speed (Kmph) ▲ 27% ▲ 51% ▲ 20%

Average Network Delay (Seconds) ▼ 30% ▼ 43% ▼ 41%


PTV SOFTWARE

SMART TRAFFIC SOLUTIONS FOR SMART CITIES

THANK YOU!

WELCOME TO PTV USER GROUP MEETING INDIA 2017

Documents

Transcript of WELCOME TO PTV USER GROUP MEETING INDIA 2017