Welcome to Chris Scoble. Agenda Brief introduction to Orrick Models for Infrastructure Development...
-
Upload
judith-goodwin -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
0
Transcript of Welcome to Chris Scoble. Agenda Brief introduction to Orrick Models for Infrastructure Development...
Welcome to
Chris Scoble
Agenda
• Brief introduction to Orrick
• Models for Infrastructure Development
• UK example of PFI and PPP (London Underground)
Orrick Today
690 Lawyers
1,550 Total Staff
13 offices in 5 countries on 3 continents
Uniquely balanced within the US with an equal distribution of lawyers on both coasts.
Growing presence in Europe and Asia.
Strategically focused on high-value engagements in carefully selected practice areas, locations, and industry sectors.
13 offices in 5 Countries on 3 Continents
TokyoSan Francisco Silicon Valley
Sacramento
Pacific Northwest
Los Angeles
New YorkWashington DC
London
Orange County
MilanRome
Paris
Orrick at a Glance: Our Practices
FINANCE
• Bankruptcy and Debt Restructuring
• Energy & Project Finance
• Global Finance
• Leasing
• Public Finance
• Structured Finance
CORPORATE
• Compensation and Benefits
• Mergers and Acquisitions
• Real Estate
• Tax
LITIGATION
• Antitrust and Competition
• Employment
• Intellectual Property
Structured Finance
Source: The Bond Buyer, Tuesday, July 1, 2003
Public Finance
Energy & Project Finance
American Lawyer Dealmaker of the Year 2003
Nomination for Project Finance : Dan Matthews
SR125 Toll Road in San Diego (CA)
US$640 million Public Private Partnership
Represented lead bank arrangers
“A groundbreaking public-private project” (International Financial Law Review)
Changing Models for Infrastructure Development
Mary Rose Brusewitz
Challenges
•Growing need for infrastructure development: power, transport, water and waste
•Competition for capital and developing local markets
•Can basic services generate sufficient profit to attract private sector?
•Sustainability of profit-making by private sector for basic services
•Risk and responsibility allocation
Structural Models
•Traditional State-owned and –operated model
•Privatization and deregulation during the 1990’s
•Public Private Partnerships
•Contractual and concession models
•U.S. municipal finance
Range of options of PSP
Finance Techniques
•Sovereign finance
•Project finance
•Structured finance or securitization
•Private or public sector company balance sheets
•Role of multilaterals and development banks and agencies
Allocation of responsibilities
Option Asset Ownership
Operations & maintenance
Capital investment
Commercial risk
Duration
Service Contract
Public Public and Private
Public Public 1-2 years
Management Contract
Public Private Public Public 3-5 years
Lease Public Private Public Shared 8-15 years
Concession Public Private Private Private 20-30 years
BOT/BOO Private and public
Private Private Private 20-30 years
Divestiture Private or public and private
Private Private Private Indefinite (may be limited by licence)
Matching Models and Techniques
•Legal, political and financial environments
•Analysis of both successful and failed models, techniques and projects
•Some types of infrastructure more easily attract private sector interest and risk appetites
•Creativity: combining models and techniques
U.S. Model: Municipal Finance• Legal system promotes tax exempt financing and attracts ‘local’
and ‘retail’ capital
• Use of ratings or ‘balance sheets’ of States or municipalities to support infrastructure development with long term financing at comparatively low cost
• General obligations of States or municipalities with financial institution guaranty
• ‘Securitized’ tax or other directed revenues
• Results in combined participation of public and private sectors in a variety of areas including commercial and residential real estate development and small business support, as well as basic services
• Key: stability of legal and regulatory structures
London Underground PFI and PPP
Martin Stewart-Smith
What was PFI?• Public sector procurement to seek value for money by offering
the opportunity to the private sector
• Had to beat the “public sector comparator”
• Initial problems were
• Lack of institutional capacity• Lack of understanding of risk allocation• High transaction costs
• The fixes were
• Setting up of the Treasury Task Force• PFI Guidelines• Standardization of documentation• Risk matrices
LUL Seeboard Powerlink PFI
• Needed to upgrade the power supply to the underground (1997)
• Technical evaluation and bidding process
• Scope of the PFI project
• Decommissioning of dedicated power stations
• Lots Road and Greenwich
• Transfer of employees and certain LUL contracts
• Complex regimes of dependencies and variations
• Total project size of over $1.04 billion
• Separated ownership of the distribution network from LUL
• Successfully closed the financing in 1999
What is PPP?
•Public Private Partnership includes PFI as well as
• Outsourcing
• Marketing of irreducible spare capacity, under the Government's Wider Markets Initiative; and
• Strategic partnerships between Govt and key suppliers.
LUL PPP
•Separation between deep lines and ‘cut and cover’ lines
•Separation of track ownership from maintenance
•Creation of separate bid packages
• Various quality criteria as output driven contracts
• Obligation to raise finance
• Transfer of employees and contracts
Taking a good credit…
•Strong cash generator
•The securitized bond debate
•Keeping the network and maintenance together
•Splitting the financing from the operational arrangements
•Public Sector Borrowing Requirement
•Treasury comfort letter – ‘off balance sheet’ nature of the debt
•The Verdict?
Graciaspor su atención