Webinar Presenters - Safe States Alliance · Source: Bowles JR. Suicide in Western Samoa: an...
Transcript of Webinar Presenters - Safe States Alliance · Source: Bowles JR. Suicide in Western Samoa: an...
Webinar Presenters
Alex E. Crosby, MD, MPH
Medical Epidemiologist
Division of Injury Prevention
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Janet M. Blair, PhD, MPH
Team Lead
Division of Violence Prevention
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Rana Bayakly, MPH
Chief Epidemiologist
Health Behaviors and Injury Epidemiology Section
Georgia Department of Public Health
Dorian A. Lamis, PhD, ABPP
Assistant Professor, Emory University School of Medicine
Director of Education and Training, Injury Prevention Research Center at Emory
3
The epidemiology and prevention of
suicidal behaviorSoutheastern and Southwestern Injury Prevention
Network
Dec 2019Alex E. Crosby
Division of Injury Prevention (DIP),
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
Atlanta, GA
"The findings and conclusions in this presentation have not been formally
disseminated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/the Agency for
Toxic Substances and Disease Registry nor the Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration and should not be construed to represent any agency
determination or policy."
4
Learning Objectives
❑At the conclusion of the session, participants
should be able to:
▪ Describe why suicide is an important public health
problem
▪ Describe the magnitude of suicidal behaviors
▪ Identify high risk groups for suicidal behaviors
▪ Identify risk and protective factors for suicide in various
age groups
▪ Cite examples of useful interventions to prevent suicide
5
Why is suicidal behavior a public health
issue?
• Morbidity and mortality• 10th leading cause of death in 2017 accounted for over 47,000 deaths
• Estimated 492,037 emergency dept visits for self-inflicted injury in 2017
(NEISS)
• Health consequences in many areas
• Physical, mental, behavioral, reproductive, sexual transmitted diseases
• Potential for impact by public health• Focus on prevention
• Science base
• Stresses multi-disciplinary approach
• Mission of public health includes this issue• “ … to reduce the amount of disease, premature death, and disease-
producing discomfort and disability in the population.” - J. Last, Dictionary of
Epidemiology 1988
6
Public Health Approach to
Suicide Prevention
❑The public health approach
seeks to answer the
foundational questions:
• What is the problem?
• How could we prevent it from
occurring
in the first place?
❑To answer these questions,
public health uses a
systematic, scientific method
for understanding and
preventing suicide.
1. Define and monitor the
problem
2. Identify risk and protective factors
3. Develop and test prevention
strategies
4. Disseminate successful strategies
widely
7
The Public Health Approach
to Prevention
1. Define and monitor the problem
2. Identify risk and protective factors
3. Develop and test prevention strategies
4. Disseminate successful strategies
widely
8
Leading causes of death for selected age
groups – United States, 2017
Rank 10-14 years 15-19 years 20-29 years 30-39 years 40-49 years 50-59 years
1 Unintentional
Injuries
Unintentional
Injuries
Unintentional
Injuries
Unintentional
Injuries
Unintentional
Injuries
Malignant
Neoplasms
2 Suicide Suicide Suicide Suicide Malignant
Neoplasms
Heart
Disease
3 Malignant
Neoplasms
Homicide Homicide Malignant
Neoplasms
Heart
Disease
Unintentional
Injuries
4 Congenital
Malformations
Malignant
Neoplasms
Malignant
Neoplasms
Heart
DiseaseSuicide Liver
Disease
5 Homicide Heart
Disease
Heart
Disease
Homicide Liver
Disease
Diabetes
Mellitus
6 Heart
Disease
Congenital
Malformations
Diabetes
Mellitus
Liver Disease Diabetes
Mellitus
Chronic Lower
Respiratory Ds
7 Chronic Lower
Respiratory Ds
Diabetes
Mellitus
Congenital
Malformations
Diabetes
Mellitus
Cerebro-
VascularSuicide
8 Cerebro-
Vascular
Influenza and
Pneumonia
Complicated
pregnancy
Cerebro-
Vascular
Homicide Cerebro-
Vascular
Source: CDC vital statistics
9
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1933
1938
1943
1948
1953
1958
1963
1968
1973
1978
1983
1988
1993
1998
2003
2008
2013
Year
Ra
te p
er
10
0,0
00
po
pu
lati
on
Male
Female
Total
Source: CDC vital statistics
Suicide among all persons by sex -- United States, 1933-2017
10
Suicidal rates among by age group and sex -- United
States, 1999 and 2017
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50R
ate
pe
r 10
0,0
00
Age group
Males
1999 2017
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Rate
pe
r 10
0,0
00
Age group
Females
1999 2017
NH = Non-Hispanic
Source: WISQARS and Curtin SC, Warner M, Hedegaard H. Suicide rates for females and males by race and
ethnicity: United States, 1999 and 2014. NCHS Health E-Stat. National Center for Health Statistics. April 2016.
11
Suicidal rates among by race/ethnicity and
by sex -- United States, 1999 and 2017
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Rate
pe
r 10
0,0
00
Race/ethnicity
Males
1999 2017
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Ra
te p
er
10
0,0
00
Race/ethnicity
Females
1999 2017
NH = Non-HispanicSource: WISQARS and Curtin SC, Warner M, Hedegaard H. Suicide rates for females and males by race and ethnicity: United States, 1999 and 2014. NCHS Health E-Stat. National Center for Health Statistics. April 2016.
12
Suicide by method – United States, 2017
Firearms
50.6%
Suffocation
27.7%
Cut/pierce
1.8%
Poisoning
13.9%
Fall
2.4%
Other
3.6%
sa
Source: CDC vital statistics
13
DC
Age-adjusted suicide rates among all persons by
state -- United States, 2017 (U.S. avg 14.0)
11.0-14.0
6.6-11.0
14.1-18.9
19.0-28.9
Source: CDC vital statistics
Rate per
100,000
14
Number and ratio of persons affected by suicidal thoughts
and behavior among adults aged ≥18 years — United
States, 2016
*Source: CDC’s National Vital Statistics System,†Source: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project - Nationwide Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS) only 1st diagnosis § Source: Source: CDC’s National Electronic Injury Surveillance System-All Injury Program ¶ Source: SAMHSA’s National Survey on Drug Use and Health
** Source: SAMHSA’s National Survey on Drug Use and Health
Number in parentheses represent the ratio of deaths to other categories
Deaths*
Hospitalizations †
Emergency Department visits§
Suicide attempts ¶
Seriously considered suicide**
43,427 (1)
114,725 (2.6)
397,975 (9.1)
1,319,000 (30.4)
9,829,000 (226.3)
15
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
10-1
4
15-1
9
20-2
4
25-2
9
30-3
4
35-3
9
40-4
4
45-4
9
50-5
4
55-5
9
60-6
465
+
Age Group in years
Ra
te p
er
10
0,0
00
po
pu
lati
on
Males
Females
Self-inflicted injury among all persons by
age and sex--United States, 2017
Source: CDC WISQARS NEISS-AIP
16
Suicidal behavior*^ among high school students
by sexual identity# and sexual contact – U.S., 2017
0
5
10
15
20
25
Sexual identity Sex of sexual contacts
Category
Perc
en
tag
e o
f all
stu
den
ts
Heterosexual/opposite sex only
LGB/same sex only or both sexes
Unsure/no sexual contact
* During the 12 months before the survey.
^ One or more times.
# Among students who ever had sexual contact
Source: Youth Risk Behavior Survey
17
The Public Health Approach
to Prevention
1. Define and monitor the problem
2. Identify risk and protective factors
3. Develop and test prevention strategies
4. Disseminate successful strategies
widely
18
Overlap of spheres of influence for suicidal behavior
Individual Peer/Family
• Spirituality
• Incarceration
• Social isolation vs
support
CommunitySociety
• Age
• Sex
• Mental illness
• Substance misuse
• Stressful life events
• Inappropriate access
to lethal means
• Geography
• Economy
• Cultural values
• Family history of
interpersonal or self-
directed violence
• Exposure to violence
19
The Public Health Approach
to Prevention
1. Define and monitor the problem
2. Identify risk and protective factors
3. Develop and test prevention strategies
4. Disseminate successful strategies
widely
20
CDC’s Technical Packages
http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pub/technical-packages.html
Source: Stone, D.M., Holland, K.M., Bartholow, B., Crosby, A.E., Davis, S., & Wilkins, N. (2017). Preventing Suicide: A Technical
Package of Policy, Programs, and Practices. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention.
▪ Child Abuse and Neglect
▪ Sexual Violence
▪ Youth Violence
▪ Intimate Partner Violence
▪ Suicide Prevention
21
Suicidal behavior prevention
Strategy Approach
Strengthen Economic Supports • Strengthen household financial security
• Housing stabilization policies
Strengthen access and delivery of suicide care • Coverage of mental health conditions in health
• insurance policies
• Reduce provider shortages in underserved areas
• Safer suicide care through systems change
Create Protective Environments • Reducing access to lethal means among persons at-risk of suicide
• Organizational policies and culture
• Community-based policies to reduce excessive alcohol use
Promote Connectedness • Peer norm programs
• Community engagement activities
Teach Coping and Problem-Solving Skills • Social-emotional learning programs
• Parenting skill and family relationship approaches
Identify and Support People At Risk • Gatekeeper training
• Crisis intervention
• Treatment for people at-risk of suicide
• Treatment to prevent re-attempts
Lessen harms and prevent future risk • Postvention
• Safe reporting and messaging about suicide
22
Suicide rates by method – Samoa,
1956-1990
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1956
1960 62 64 66 68
1970 72 74 76 78
1980 82 84 86 88
Total suicidesParaquat suicides
Arrival of Paraquat
Control of Paraquat availability
Suic
ide r
ate
Source: Bowles JR. Suicide in Western Samoa: an example of a suicide prevention program in a developing country. In:
Diekstra RFW et al., eds. Preventive strategies on suicide. Leiden, Brill, 1995:173–206.
23
The Public Health Approach
to Prevention
1. Define and monitor the problem
2. Identify risk and protective factors
3. Develop and test prevention strategies
4. Disseminate successful strategies
widely
24
National Strategy for Suicide
Prevention (NSSP)
❑4 strategic directions; 13 goals; 60 objectives
❑Strategic Directions
1.Healthy and Empowered Individuals, Families, and Communities
2.Clinical and Community Preventive Services
3.Treatment and Support Services
4.Surveillance, Research, and Evaluation
Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of the
Surgeon General and National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention. 2012
National Strategy for Suicide Prevention: Goals and Objectives for Action.
Washington, DC: HHS, September 2012
25
VetoViolence.cdc.gov
Violence Prevention in Practice
26
7 phases in comprehensive
violence prevention
Evaluation
Partnership
Implementation
Planning Policy Efforts
AdaptationStrategies and Approaches
27
S
28
Conclusion
• Suicide is a significant public health problem
• Results from an interaction of factors• never a single issue that causes a suicide
• multiple opportunities for action
• Research has shown much of suicidal behavior can be prevented
• Broad responsibility for addressing the issue
• communities must work together
• no one person or group can do it alone
29
Thank You
For more information please contact
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
1600 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30333
Telephone: 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)/TTY: 1-888-232-6348
Visit: www.cdc.gov | Contact CDC at: 1-800-CDC-INFO or www.cdc.gov/info
National Center for Injury Prevention and Control
National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS) Overview
Janet M. Blair, PhD MPH
Team Lead, Mortality Surveillance Team
Surveillance BranchSoutheastern and Southwestern Injury Prevention Network
Safe States Alliance
December 4, 2019
The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Division of Violence Prevention
What Do We Know About Violence?
▪ Number of violent deaths only tells part of story
▪ Millions of people experience adverse physical, mental, and economic consequences
▪ Violence erodes communities by reducing productivity, decreasing property values, and disrupting social services
▪ Devastating impact on families, communities, and society
▪ Violence is preventable
– Information needed for prevention
600+ data fields
Death Certificates LE Reports C/ME Reports
Two narratives describing the incident: ▪ 1 based on LE report▪ 1 on C/ME report
600+ variables
Death Certificates LE Reports
Injury characteristics Demographics Circumstances Mental Health Diagnoses Toxicology
C/ME Reports
What is an NVDRS Case?
▪ Suicide
▪ Homicide
▪ Deaths of undetermined intent
▪ Legal intervention (excluding executions)
▪ Unintentional firearm deaths
NVDRS is Unique
▪ Tells the who, what, when, where, why, and how
▪ Is comprehensive - includes all age groups
▪ Combines sources to get full picture
– Details about incident
– Information about victims, suspects
– Information about circumstances: events that preceded or were determined to be related to the violent death
NVDRS▪ Data collected by recipients through partnerships
▪ No personally identifying information collected in system
▪ Information collected using a web-based application
▪ Trained abstractors enter data consistent with CDC guidance
▪ Provides information for prevention
What can NVDRS do?
▪ Uncover timely topics and emerging issues
▪ Reveal important variations in patterns
▪ Lead to better understanding of circumstances contributing to violence
▪ Guide and evaluate violence prevention efforts
▪ Help create safer and healthier communities
Recent CDC Suicide-Related Publications
Factors Contributing to Suicide
Suicides Among American Indian/Alaska Natives
NVDRS: Responding to Timely Topics Affecting Military Personnel
▪ Circumstances preceding suicide in U.S. soldiers: A qualitative analysis of narrative data (Psychological Services, 2019)
▪ NVDRS Special Report - Deaths from Suicide among U.S. Veterans and Armed Forces in 16 States (Safe States Alliance, 2018)
▪ Surveillance for Violent Deaths — National Violent Death Reporting System, 27 States, 2015 (Special feature: Suicide among military personnel) (MMWR, 2018)
▪ Suicide Among Military Personnel and Veterans Aged 18–35 Years by County—16 States (Am J Preventive Medicine, 2016)
Chronic Pain and Suicide
Cancer and Suicide
Suicides among Lesbian and Gay Individuals
NVDRS MMWR Surveillance Summary
Using VDRS Data for Suicide Prevention
Data Supports Suicide PreventionRhode Island
▪ Data used to provide an overview of the epidemiology of youth suicide
▪ Mental health issues often precipitated suicides
▪ Information used to inform communities on signs and risks of suicide
Data Supports Suicide PreventionOregon
▪ Data indicated need to target older adults
▪ Developed state suicide prevention plan and targeted prevention efforts on older adults
▪ Over 1/3 of decedents had visited a physician in the last 30 days of their life
▪ Suggested that training physicians could be a promising approach
Suicides of Active Duty Military and VeteransAlaska
▪ Using VDRS data to identify veteran
suicides and circumstances
▪ Working with the Alaska Veterans Affairs
suicide prevention program
▪ Information will be used to develop policies, intervention and prevention strategies
Suicides Among First Responders
Colorado
▪ First responders (law enforcement, fire, EMS) more likely to have been a veteran than general population of suicide decedents
▪ Raises issues about needs veterans may have as they transition from one high-stress position to another
▪ Acknowledges needs of veterans continuing work as first responders
▪ Prevention can focus on positive mental and physical health
Data Supports Suicide Prevention
North Carolina
▪ Report, Burden of Suicide in North Carolina
created using North Carolina VDRS data
▪ Quantified problem
▪ Identified circumstances and populations at risk
▪ Informed the statewide Suicide Prevention Plan development process
NVDRS Restricted Access Database (RAD)▪ For researchers who meet established criteria
▪ Opportunity to conduct analyses using NVDRS data
▪ Data available as a flat file to promote ease of use and analysis
▪ More information available at the NVDRS RAD website:
https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/nvdrs/rad.html
NVDRS Restricted Access Database (RAD) Requests by Year, 2014 – October 28, 2019
3
1216
28
55
69
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Year
Number of Requests
NVDRS WISQARS Data – Available to Public
▪ Public access on the Web
http://wisqars.cdc.gov:8080/nvdrs/nvdrsDisplay.jsp
▪ 2015 NVDRS WISQARS data released in January 2018
– 2016 data coming soon
▪ Select variables to run your own reports
– Manner of death
– Victim/suspect relationship
– Weapon type
– Vulnerable populations
– Circumstances
To learn more, visit the NVDRS website
https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/datasources/nvdrs/index.html
NVDRS Grantees
Vital Statistics, Coroner/Medical Examiner, and Law Enforcement staff in NVDRS States
Surveillance Branch, Office of the Chief▪ Kathleen McDavid Harrison PhD MPH FACE,
Surveillance Branch Chief▪ Leroy Frazier Jr. MSPH CHES,
Surveillance Branch Deputy Chief▪ Shannon Bryan MA,
Health Education Specialist
Mortality Surveillance Team/Surveillance Coordination Team
▪ Apreal Bailey MPH, Project Officer▪ Jamar Barnes MPH, Project Officer▪ Carter Betz MS, Programmer/Analyst▪ Janet Blair PhD MPH, Team Lead▪ Craig Bryant Computer Scientist▪ Jacqueline Crain, Public Health Advisor▪ Shane Davis Jack PhD, Science Officer▪ James Diggs MPH CHES, Public Health Advisor ▪ Allison Ertl PhD Science Officer▪ Katherine Fowler PhD, Senior Scientist ▪ Bernita Frazier PhD MPA, Public Health Advisor▪ Rachel Leavitt MPH, Project Officer▪ Colby Lokey MPH, Project Officer▪ Michele LaLand Project Officer▪ Bridget Lyons MPH, Science Officer ▪ Emiko Petrosky MD, MPH, Science Officer▪ Lennisha Pinckney, MPH ORISE Fellow▪ Kameron Sheats PhD, Science Officer▪ Rebecca Wilson PhD, Project Officer▪ Keming Yuan MS, Mathematical Statistician
Acknowledgments
For more information, contact CDC1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)TTY: 1-888-232-6348 www.cdc.gov
The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Thank you!
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Georgia Violent Death Report System (GA-VDRS)
Southeastern & Southwestern Injury Prevention Network, Rana Bayakly, December 4, 2019
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Outline
DATA COLLECTION PROCESS INFORMATION ABSTRACTED VS INFORMATION CODED
DATA AVAILABILITY AND ACCESS
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
What is NVDRS
The National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS) is a state-based surveillance system that assist states in designing and implementing tailored prevention and intervention efforts.
NVDRS defines violent death as "a death resulting from the intentional use of physical force or power against oneself, another person, or against a group or community.“
NVDRS collects data on homicides, suicides, deaths by legal intervention-excluding executions-and deaths of undetermined intent. In addition, information about unintentional firearm injury deaths is collected.
NVDRS is incident-based, each record includes data on all victims and suspects associated with a given incident. Multiple victims and/or suspects are determined for inclusion into a single incident record by the violent injuries.
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Data Collection Process
Data Sources➢ GA-VDRS consolidate information from various sources into one record:
• Death Certificates (GA Vital Records)
• Medical Examiner (5) and Coroner Reports (154)
✓ GA is Decentralized and Mixed system
• Police Reports --Police Department and Sheriff Offices (> 800 offices)
• Georgia Bureau of Investigation (GBI)
✓ Supplemental Homicide Reports --GBI
✓ Crime Laboratory Reports --GBI
✓ Toxicology Reports--GBI/ME
✓ Child Fatality Review--GBI
• Emergency Medical Services (EMS)—(GA office of EMS and Trauma)
• Online/Newspaper and Other Media Sources
➢ GA-VDRS collect uniform data elements developed by CDC/NVDRS in
collaboration with funded states.
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Data FlowNational Violent Death Reporting System
(CDC)
GEMSIS (DPH)
GA-VDRS data product
GEORGIA VIOLENT DEATH REPORTING SYSTEM (2018)
SYMBOLS
Beginning and/or end of data flow
Dynamic data base with direct access to data modification
Process
Static data sets for analyses
Data flow direction
Death certificate data file
Law Enforcement
Georgia Bureau of Investigation (GBI)
GBI’s Supplemental
Homicide Report
ME’s Toxicology
Report
Mass Media
Vital Records (DPH)
Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Agencies
Coroner’s Office
Funeral Homes Hospitals
GBI’s Toxicology Report
GBI’s Child Fatality Report
Data abstractors (DPH)
EMS data search (DPH)
Medical Examiner’s (ME)
Office
GA-VDRS Import
GA-VDRS Export
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Data FlowNational Violent Death Reporting System
(CDC)
GEMSIS (DPH)
GA-VDRS data product
GEORGIA VIOLENT DEATH REPORTING SYSTEM (2018)
SYMBOLS
Beginning and/or end of data flow
Dynamic data base with direct access to data modification
Process
Static data sets for analyses
Data flow direction
Death certificate data file
Law Enforcement
Georgia Bureau of Investigation (GBI)
GBI’s Supplemental
Homicide Report
ME’s Toxicology
Report
Mass Media
Vital Records (DPH)
Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Agencies
Coroner’s Office
Funeral Homes Hospitals
GBI’s Toxicology Report
GBI’s Child Fatality Report
Data abstractors (DPH)
EMS data search (DPH)
Medical Examiner’s (ME)
Office
GA-VDRS Import
GA-VDRS Export
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Data Flow National Violent Death Reporting System (CDC)
GEMSIS (DPH)
GA-VDRS data product
GEORGIA VIOLENT DEATH REPORTING SYSTEM (2018)
SYMBOLS
Beginning and/or end of data flow
Dynamic data base with direct access to data modification
Process
Static data sets for analyses
Data flow direction
Death certificate data file
Law Enforcement
Georgia Bureau of Investigation (GBI)
GBI’s Supplemental
Homicide Report
ME’s Toxicology
Report
Mass Media
Vital Records (DPH)
Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Agencies
Coroner’s Office
Funeral Homes Hospitals
GBI’s Toxicology Report
GBI’s Child Fatality Report
Data abstractors (DPH)
EMS data search (DPH)
Medical Examiner’s (ME)
Office
GA-VDRS Import
GA-VDRS Export
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Timeline
• Case initiation within 120 days from date of death.
• Year close 16 months after close of calendar year (April 30th).
• Data released by CDC/NVDRS to states in September of each year
• Data released on CDC website (WISQARS) in November/December of each year
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Added Information to the Death Certificate
Circumstantial Information
Narrative that build your story
Health• Mental Health• Depression• Physical Health• Substance Abuse
Life Stressors• Financial Problems/Job Loss• Recent Family Loss• Incarceration• School Problem
Relationship Problem• Intimate Partner Problem/Violence• Child/Adult Abuse• Bullying
Weapon Information Gained
• Handgun, Shotgun, Rifle etc..
• Model and Make
• Bullets
• Ownership
Type of Gun
• Scene Description
EMS Report
Suicide Among Persons With
Dementia, Georgia, 2013 to
2016
Francis B. Annor, PhD, Rana A. Bayakly, MPH, Reynolds A. Morrison, MPH, Michael J. Bryan, PhD, Leah K. Gilbert, MD, Asha Z. Ivey-Stephenson, PhD, Kristin M. Holland, PhD, Thomas Simon, PhD
Journal of Geriatric Psychiatryand Neurology, 2018
DOI: 10.1177/0891988718814363journals.sagepub.com/home/jgp
Characteristics and Contextual Stressors in Farmer and Agricultural Worker Suicides in Georgia From 2008–2015
Journal of Rural Mental Health
Authors
Anna Scheyett, Rana Bayakly, and Michael
Whitaker
Online First Publication, March 14, 2019.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/rmh0000114
Narrative
Financial
Victim was depressed because of financial problems & declining health. Victim had a heart attack 3 months prior. V[ictim]’s [primary relationship] had lost her job and there were hospital bills. V[ictim] . . . did not leave a note, however, there was an unopened First Bank envelope on the kitchen table and Hartford life insurance
policy.
Health
The Victim’s [close relative] advised that the decedent was depressed and voiced suicidal ideation in the past month because he was “hurting so badly and did not want to live anymore”. . . The Victim’s medical history included cardiovascular issues, chronic pain, degenerative arthritis, knee replacement, shoulder surgery, and ostomy due to colitis.
Narrative
Health Behavior
Victim and his [primary relationship] were fighting about Victim’s heavy drinking, [with the primary relationship] wanting Victim to get help for his drinking . . . [primary relationship] stated that they cooked dinner and they were still fighting about his drinking and the Victim stated he would just kill himself . . . She then heard the gun go off.
Relationship Problem
The Victim’s [primary relationship] of 23 years recently left the Victim for another man approximately 3 weeks ago. The Victim was reportedly very upset with the situation. The date of the incident is actually the [primary relationship’s] birthday. Included in the note were apologies to his children for not being able to go on and also stating that now his [primary relationship] was free to marry
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Data Availability and Access
Data Availability (NVDRS)
Web-Based Injury Statistics Query And Reporting System (WISQARS)
https://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/nvdrs.html
• Descriptive Statistics• Trends• Comparison
https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/datasources/nvdrs/RAD.html
• Research that include multiple states
Georgia
https://oasis.state.ga.us/
Contact Information
Rana Bayakly, MPH Elizabeth Blankenship, MPH
GA-VDRS Principal Investigator GA-VDRS Epidemiologist
2 Peachtree Street NW 2 Peachtree Street NW
14th Floor, Ste 14-440 14th Floor
Atlanta, Georgia, 30303 Atlanta, Georgia, 30303
[email protected] [email protected]
(404) 657-2617 (404) 657-2635
https://dph.georgia.gov/GVDRS
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Georgia Violent Death Reporting System
https://dph.georgia.gov/institutional-review-board
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Georgia Violent Death Reporting Systemhttps://dph.georgia.gov/institutional-review-board
DPH Sponsor
Rana Bayakly, MPHGA-VDRS Principal Investigator2 Peachtree Street NW14th Floor, Ste 14-440Atlanta, Georgia, [email protected](404) 657-2617
Elizabeth Blankenship, MPHGA-VDRS [email protected](404) 657-2635
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Suicide Risk Assessment
and Safety Planning
Dorian A. Lamis, PhD, ABPP
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
External Industry Relationships * Company Name(s) Role
Equity, stock, or options in biomedical industry companies or publishers**
None
Board of Directors or officer None
Royalties from Emory or from external entity
None
Industry funds to Emory for my research None
Other None
*Consulting, scientific advisory board, industry-sponsored CME, expert witness for company, FDA representative for company,
publishing contract, etc.
**Does not include stock in publicly-traded companies in retirement funds and other pooled investment accounts managed by others.
Dr. Dorian A. Lamis Personal/Professional Financial Relationships with Industry
Webinar Covers
• Suicide Risk and Protective Factors
• Suicide Risk Assessment and Formulation
• Safety Planning Intervention
Webinar Covers
• Suicide Risk and Protective Factors
• Suicide Risk Assessment and Formulation
• Safety Planning Intervention
Suicide: A Multi-factorial Event
Neurobiology
Severe MedicalIllness
Impulsiveness
Access To Weapons
Hopelessness
Life Stressors
Family History
SuicidalBehavior
Personality Disorder/Traits
Psychiatric IllnessCo-morbidity
Psychodynamics/Psychological Vulnerability
Substance Use/Abuse
Suicide
Key Risk Factors
• Demographics (Older, Male, White)
• Family history (suicide, family violence)
• Suicide and psychiatric history
• Genetics & Epigenetics
• Psychiatric symptoms & disorders (SUD, BD)
• Physical illnesses (MS, HIV)
Key Risk Factors• Childhood abuse, Intimate Partner Violence
• Acquired capability (desire to die, ability to do so)
• Access to lethal means
• Social support challenges and stress
• Cognitive deficits
• Environmental stressors (financial, legal, job loss)
• Responsibility to family
• Religious involvement
• Meaning/Purpose
• Cultural beliefs opposed to suicide
• Life satisfaction
• Reasons for living
• Positive coping skills
• Emotion regulation
• Positive problem-solving skills
• Social support: Connectedness
• Positive therapeutic alliance
• Good clinical care
• Adherence with psychiatric medications
Key Protective Factors
Webinar Covers
• Suicide Risk and Protective Factors
• Suicide Risk Assessment and Formulation
• Safety Planning Intervention
Suicide Risk Assessment
• Establish rapport
• Give the patient an opportunity to say what is
troubling them
• Convey interest in patient’s problems/concerns
• Ask about continuum of suicidal behavior after
discussing concerns
• Allow time for a thorough assessment
Suicide Risk Assessment
• Systematic and disciplined, and more than a guess
or intuition
• Requires one to:
• Ask directly about suicidal thoughts, feelings, and
actions
• Obtain history regarding risk/protective factors
• Determine full mental status
• Gather collateral data
• Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (CSSRS)
• Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (BSSI)
• Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire–Revised (SBQ-R)
• Suicide Status Form (SSF)
• Modified Scale for Suicidal Ideation (MSSI)
Assessment Instruments
Webinar Covers
• Suicide Risk and Protective Factors
• Suicide Risk Assessment and Formulation
• Safety Planning Intervention
What is a Safety Plan?
• A prioritized written list of:
– Coping strategies
– Sources of support
– Can be used during or preceding a
suicidal crises
• Safety Plan found at: http://www.suicidesafetyplan.com/
• Suicide Safety Plan Apps: “BeyondNow”; “Suicide Safety Plan”;
“My3”
• Developed after suicide assessment
– Or a recent distressing event
• Use their story about the current crisis
– Events transpired before, during, and after the crisis.
• Collaborative process
– Sit side-by-side
• Use a “Safety Plan” form or App
– Use patient’s own words
– Should be easy-to-read
Developing a Safety Plan
Patient’s Warning Signs:
Thoughts: “I’m worthless”
Thinking Processes: Racing thoughts; catastrophizing
Mood: Irritable/anger
Body: Tense
Behavior: Pacing; time by yourself
Helpful Question:
How do you know when the safety plan should be
used?
Step 1: Recognizing Warning Signs
• Help patients cope on their own
– Distraction
▪Go on a walk (count your steps)
▪Pray
▪Listen to music
▪Take a shower
▪Play with a pet
▪Engage in a hobby
Helpful Question:
What can you do on your own if you start to become
distressed or suicidal?
Step 2: Using Internal Coping Strategies
• Help identify distractors: key social settings/people− NOT for reaching out to others for help w/crisis
1. Healthy Social Settings (list location)− Coffee shops
− Places of religion
2. Individuals (list phone #)− Family
− Friends
Helpful Question:
Who or what social settings help you take your mind off
your problems and/or reduce stress and suicidal thoughts?
Step 3: Utilizing Social Contacts
Step 4: Contacting Family or Friends
• Help identify others to disclose/manage crisis
– Clergy, family, close friend (list phone #s)
• Plan is intended to be helpful and supportive
– Weigh the pros and cons of disclosing
– Not a source of stress
Helpful Questions:
1) Among your family or friends, who do you think you could
contact for help during a crisis?
2) Who is supportive of you and who do you feel that you can
talk with when you’re under stress or suicidal?
• Help identify a professional or agency
• Prioritize the list of professionals and agencies
– Clinician, PCP, Crisis Line, 911
• Include names and contact information
– Esp. those reached during non-business hours
Helpful Question:
Who are the mental health professionals that we
should identify to be on your safety plan?
Step 5: Contacting Professionals/Agencies
Step 6: ↓ Potential for Use of Lethal Means
A KEY component of a safety plan
• Routinely ask about access to:
– Guns, knives, drugs, or medications
• Restrict access to means
– Friend store gun, medications locked in safe place
• NOTE on plan:
– Behaviors necessary to make environment safer
Safety Plan Example
Implementation of the Safety Plan
• Assess the likelihood that plan will be used
– Obstacles?
– Solutions?
• Periodically review/revise Safety Plan in therapy
Helpful Questions:
1) How likely is it that you will use the safety plan?
2) What might get in the way of using the plan?
Dorian A. Lamis, PhD, ABPP
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
Emory University School of Medicine
Questions or Comments
Contact InformationBelinda-Rose Young, MSPH, CPH
Outreach & Network Coordinator
Southeastern and Southwestern Injury Prevention Network
E-mail: [email protected]