Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

70
Lecture Series Web: Liberty Fraternity Equality Anirudh Agrawal PhD Fellow IKL

description

Web 2.0, innovaton, social media marketing

Transcript of Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Page 1: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Lecture SeriesWeb: Liberty

Fraternity Equality

Anirudh AgrawalPhD Fellow IKL

Page 2: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Last Week

• Fundamental Rights– Shared Values, Share rights

• Internet growth and the emergence of New Media– Paradigm shift

• Social movements, Civil Society Organizations– Collective values– http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=

fgwl7YelOUY

state

marketCivil society

Page 3: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Lecture 5

• Online Activism• Social Media Marketing• Co-creation• Crowdsourcing

Page 4: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

1. Online Activism

Page 5: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Online Campaign

• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5LIpTKOCHY8

Page 6: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Online Activism : Wikileaks• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jzMN2c24Y1s• “We open governments”• Allows people to give – and get – raw information

without relying on the traditional news media.

Page 7: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Twitter in….Iran

• Al Jazeera (10 Jan 2011): “In the summer of 2009, the word on everyone's lips was "Iran." As the youthful Green Movement rose up against what they perceived to be a tampered election, the world banded together in solidarity. The hashtag #iranelection trended on Twitter for weeks, while media outlets spoke of a "Twitter revolution.”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=

7jln9jba4cU

Page 8: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Twitter in London

• Student protests last month (December 2010) against fees.

• Activists used Twitter and Google Maps to avoid police, and send messages to each other about where to organize.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJ9gnuDCv64

Page 9: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

What is Occupy Wall Street

• Movement against social, economic inequality, influence of corporate money and lobbyists on government

• Participants are the “99%”• Started in New York on September 17 and has

moved world wide • 82 countries, 1000 cities• Presidential commission whose goal is to end the

control money has over our representatives in Washington

• Equal distribution of wealth • “people before profits”• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=re4CWYuxlc0

Page 12: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Activity 1

• In groups of 4/5 , Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of Social Media in activism and advocacy?

• Do a SWOT Analysis of social media in activism and advocacy?

• You have …10 minutes

• Eg.

Dis-advantages Advantages

London Riots GreenPeace Campaign against Coke (last lecture)

Anti-Islam movie and following riots across the world

Transparency through wikileaks

Rumor mongering transparency

Page 13: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Strength(I) S W Weakness(I)

Opportunities(x) O T Threats(x)

Page 14: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

2. Social Media Marketing

Page 15: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Viral Marketing- What is it?

• Like WOM, relying on individuals to pass along a marketing message through any form of communication

• Provides a message that encourages others to spread the word about the firm/product/service

• Name derived from virus, the effect multiplies just life the growth rate of virus

• Chain reaction

Page 16: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Who are the carriers of Viral marketing

• Bloggers• First users/lead users• Journalists• Communities with strong identities

Page 17: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

How to achieve viral marketing?

• Bring out emotion form the customer• Do something unexpected• KISS• Don’t try to make an advertisement• Make sequels• Offer incentives• Allow sharing, downloading• Call for feedback

Page 18: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Benefits of viral marketing

• Cost – effective• Quickly build brand recognition/reputation• Gain short term/long term visitors

Page 19: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

WOM as a strategic factorfor companies

the importance of promoters

Courtesy : Elanor Colleoni

Page 20: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

The dangers of Detractors

WOM could also be Negative

Courtesy : Elanor Colleoni

Page 21: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Correlation between WOM and income growth

Courtesy : Elanor Colleoni

Page 22: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Online Engagement

Page 23: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Coke Online Viral Marketing

• 2009 Coke spent approximately $3 billion worldwide

• cost-effective way to build deeper connections with consumers, especially teens

• Coke Market research Campaign– 73 percent of teens online– If teens loved a piece of digital content, they

hesitated to post a link to it on their Facebook or MySpace page out of fear that their friends would not approve their choices

– Share content validated by their peers

Page 24: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Coke Online Viral Marketing

• Launched digital media applications focused on teens– Iphone/android based application (I million

dl)– Facebook/Myspace/Orkut based

applications(1 million dl)– Goodies package including wallpapers,

screensavers (2 million dl)– Happiness Machine– http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=

lqT_dPApj9U (6 million views)

• Cost of the video : 50000 Dollars

Page 25: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Result on the video

• Within 10 days on facebook, 1 million views

• 50 percent outside US, 70 percent blogpost other than english

• Positive impacts, switching from pepsi to coke

• Happiness/connection/youthfulness/cool ness/emotions

• Success promoted further investment in social media

Page 26: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Lessons Learnt

• Online Consumer behavior – wom, past preference, evaluation, need

based

• Develop a social media HUB– blogs, wiki, forums, search, user ratings,

Web content

• Develop Great Content – cool videos, cool quotes, cool pictures,

fantastic user interface, content

• Facilitate action on the part of user• Measure progress, improvise, set goals

Page 27: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Follow Online Customer review to Determine whether a local business is a good business

Source: The Local Consumer Review Survey 2012, the search engine land

Page 28: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

No. of Online reviews one needs to read before deciding to trust a local business

Source: The Local Consumer Review Survey 2012, the search engine land

Page 29: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Does online reviews impact consumer perception of the local business

Source: The Local Consumer Review Survey 2012, the search engine land

Page 30: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Trust the online reviews as much as personnel recommendations

Source: The Local Consumer Review Survey 2012, the search engine land

Page 31: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Case Trip Advisor

• Travel website that assists travellers in gathering travel related information like reviews, opinions and issues

• Third most visited travel website• Worlds larget social travel network• User-generated content

User-Generated Content and Travel: A Case Study on Tripadvisor.Com

Page 32: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

User-Generated Content and Travel: A Case Study on Tripadvisor.Com

Page 33: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Traveler as Travel Guide!

User-Generated Content and Travel: A Case Study on Tripadvisor.Com

Page 34: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Tripadvisor case…Challenge of authenticity

• Press reports call into question the legitimacy of the review system

• Perhaps some reviews are not genuine? • No-verification process for the entries• TripAdvisor posts notices warning that fake

reviews will not be tolerated and hotels attempting to manipulate the system will be penalised in their rankings and be identified as have tried to post fake reviews, blacklisting of hotels for faking the rating

ENTER 2008 Research Track Slide Number 34

User-Generated Content and Travel: A Case Study on Tripadvisor.Com

Page 35: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Tripadvisor case…Research Objectives

• To explore how hotels are presented on TripAdvisor

• To investigate if relationships existed between characteristics (such as star rating) and positioning on the system

• To establish if hotels were utilising their right to reply

• To search for evidence of dirty tricks

ENTER 2008 Research Track Slide Number 35

User-Generated Content and Travel: A Case Study on Tripadvisor.Com

Page 36: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Tripadvisor case…Research Methodology

• 100 London hotels• Selected characteristics (star rating,

TripAdvisor Traveller Rating, rank within the London market, average rate and number of reviews listed) recorded

• Five most recent reviews analysed in detail

ENTER 2008 Research Track Slide Number 36

Page 37: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Tripadvisor case…Results

ENTER 2008 Research Track Slide Number 37

Star Rating

Number Average Rank within London

Average TripAdvisor

Rating

Average number of

reviews

Average Room Rate

(US$) Unclassified 46 468 3.10 67.6 256

1 star 4 857 1.75 38.5 154 2 star 4 470 3.25 32.5 188 3 star 32 290 3.56 83.1 316 4 star 10 91 4.10 129 409 5 star 4 314 3.50 33 555

Overall 100 383 3.32 74.76 282

Page 38: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Tripadvisor case.False Reviews?

ENTER 2008 Research Track Slide Number 38

Measure Sample Single Reviews Multiple Reviews Mean 3.14 2.93 ** 3.33 ** Standard Deviation 1.48 1.63 1.31

TripAdvisor Rank

Suspect Reviews

Other Single Reviews

Multiple Reviews

Overall sample

1 36% 21% 12% 21% 2 14% 14% 16% 15% 3 11% 7% 20% 16% 4 15% 24% 29% 24% 5 24% 34% 22% 24%

Extreme scores and a solitary visit by the reviewer to join and post the review

User-Generated Content and Travel: A Case Study on Tripadvisor.Com

Page 39: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Tripadvisor case..Conclusion• All hotels the subject of multiple reviews• “Right to reply” rarely used• Little (if any) evidence of false reviews• No hotels identified as having posted fake reviews

ENTER 2008 Research Track Slide Number 39

User-Generated Content and Travel: A Case Study on Tripadvisor.Com

Page 40: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Reliability of user rating on online platform (2003)

Page 41: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Discussion

• Monopoly / Legitimacy/Pressures/Authenticity

• How do you preserve your moral position against commercial pressures?

Page 42: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tPgQsv2KPwc

Page 43: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Samsung GS 4

• http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=dIEfNaNCkKM#!

Page 44: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Activity 2Vampire is a lingerie venture which is 5 year old,. This year it accounted for 10 million dollars of annual revenue. Its revenues were 20 percent less than that of last year. In the recent board meeting it concluded that its marketing is not producing any new costumers. Its annual marketing budged is capped at 20 % of the annual revenues. Its marketing budget includes :- Promotions at Fashion Shows 40% of the marketing budgetMarketing and Promotion to prominent retail players 20% of the marketing budgetIts print media promotions and communications: 20% of the marketing budget including its websitePromotions through its CSR campaign and CSR activities 10% of the marketing costsEcommerce based promotions 10% of the marketing budget Its primary costumers are low wage Americans, where 95 % of them are from California, Texas and Nevada . Its primary sales mechanism is through supermarket retail outlets like Wal-Mart.. Now, it is strategizing to expand into ecommerce domain as well. Task : Design a Social media based marketing strategy for Vampire. Costs of social media is as follows: Youtube video production: 100 000 dollarsYoutube video adwords: 100 dollars/city/monthGoogle adwords : 100 dollars/city/monthYahoo adwards: 100 dollars/city/monthFacebook adwards: 100 dollars/city/month Optimise the budget such that the marketing produces the highest impact. Give reasons for your choice. Discuss them in the class.Think about brandingRevenuesNew InvestmentLimited marketing budget

Page 45: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

3. Co-Creation and Crowdsourcing

Page 46: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Co-Creation

Courtesy : Elanor Colleoni

Page 47: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Courtesy : Elanor Colleoni

Page 48: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Potential Actors in a Co-Creative Process

Actors involved in co-creation

Insiders Users Customers Vendors Citizens …..

Co-Creation not only involves customers and users, but also many other stakeholders; thus co-creation is more than user-driven innovation!

Co-creation processes can “produce” customized and personalized products and services but also standardized or mass products.

Co-creation contains the web 2.0 enabled concepts such as mass collaboration, open contents, crowd sourcing and open source.

Courtesy Prof. Dr. Thorsten Posselt

Page 49: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

The Co-Creation Principle

Human experiences

Co-creatio

n

Collaborative process

Engagement platforms

According to Ramaswamy/Gouillart (2010)

Real-Time visualization

Dialog about experiences

Value creation together with customers and stakeholders

Live meetings Websites Open/private

communities

Courtesy Prof. Dr. Thorsten Posselt

Page 50: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Courtesy : Elanor Colleoni

Page 51: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Courtesy : Elanor Colleoni

Page 53: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Courtesy : Elanor Colleoni

Page 54: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vV_mSNI_b8Q

Courtesy : Elanor Colleoni

Page 55: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Courtesy : Elanor Colleoni

Page 56: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=daautsKE8tA

Courtesy : Elanor Colleoni

Page 57: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Courtesy : Elanor Colleoni

Page 58: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-z_vqGNN5w

Courtesy : Elanor Colleoni

Page 59: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing
Page 60: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Crowdsourcing is a process that involves outsourcing tasks to a distributed group of people. This process can occur both online and offline, and the difference between crowdsourcing and ordinary outsourcing is that a task or problem is outsourced to an undefined public rather than a specific body, such as paid employees.

Crowdsourcing

Courtesy : Elanor Colleoni

Page 61: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Commons-based peer production

“Any one of a wide range of collaborative

efforts we are seeing emerging on the Net

in which a group of people engages in a

cooperative production enterprise.”

Benkler

Courtesy : Elanor Colleoni

Page 62: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

• Crowdsourcing is an online, distributed problem-solving and production model

• Crowdsourcing is channeling the experts’ desire to solve a problem and then freely sharing the answer with everyone

• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSTurPXtDAw

Page 63: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Problem

How can we organize a crowdsourcing platform?

Courtesy : Elanor Colleoni

Page 64: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Social Production: FeasibilityAll the inputs necessary to effective productive activity are under control of individual users:• Inputs Need:

– Human factors: Time, creativity, wisdom, knowledge and culture

– Computers (for production)– Networks (for distribution)(Time as ”excess capacity available to be used for activities whose rewards are not monetary, directly or indirectly”)

Courtesy : Elanor Colleoni

Page 65: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

• Extrinsic (external forces, payoffs and social rewards) vs. Intrincic (personal satisfaction or pleasure) reasons

• Social reputation (community-based motivations, eg. recognition)

• Loyalty or friendship• For any given culture, there will be some acts that a

person would prefer to perform not for money, but for social standing and recognition.

• Social and money-oriented motivations are historically and cultural contingent

What motivates people to Produce?

Courtesy : Elanor Colleoni

Page 66: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

• Contributions are diverse in quality, quantity, focus, timing…

• Two main technical and organizational architectures: Modularity and granularity- Modularity: Tasks can be broken down into

independent modules before they are assembled

- Granularity: The size of the modules in terms of time and effort an individual must invest

Critical for success: Organizational architectures

Courtesy : Elanor Colleoni

Page 67: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

When crowdsourcing not Effective?

• When the means of production required are expensive, or hard to get access to (eg. Large machinery)

• When the raw materials are expensive, or hard to get access to (eg. Steel)

• When technology or systems do not permit sharing• When people have no time to spare

Courtesy : Elanor Colleoni

Page 68: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Activity 3You own a successful e-commerce venture UNMondial focused on Travel (international travel, adventure travel, culture travel, forest travel, cruise). The annual revenues of the business are going down yearly. Last year the revenues were 30 million dollars. They were 10 percent down from the previous one. You have fired 2 high profile CEOs in the last 18 months. The firm has reached a roadblock in terms of new customer acquisition, new market acquisition, technology innovation, and business model innovation. The main sources of revenue areOn-line travel and experience package deals for your oriented back-pack travelling (40 % of revenues)On –line travel and experience package deals for salaried/middle age comfort travelling (25 % of revenues)Online ticketing (15 % revenues)Tour packages, honeymoon packages, group travel packages, corporate tour packages (15 % revenues)Offline travel books, experience books (5 % revenues) The firm is facing much competition in the market.More players in the e-commerce marketProfit margins on revenue decreasingLiquidity crunch due to financial crises, less spending on leisure….…..and more Remember:Key drivers to increase reveneus areIncreasing pressure on employees to performIncreasing the budget on marketingSqueezing margins on profit and catering to larger communityIncreasing quality of service on online media… Device an innovation strategy for this firm on e-commerce medium keeping in mind: -Social Media strategiesCo-creation activitiesCrowdsourcing activities

Page 69: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

Lecture 6

• Business model Analysis• Business Model Canvas• Case Kiva vs MYC4• Open Innovation

Page 70: Web2.0 online activism crowdsourcing

www.businessmodelgeneration.com

Cost structure Revenue streams

Key resources Channels

Key activitiesKey partners Value proposition

Costumer relationships

Costumer segments

Text

Text

Text Text Text

KIVA and MYC4