jessicasaenzhrd.weebly.com€¦ · Web viewHuman Resource Development (HRD) was introduced to me...
Click here to load reader
Transcript of jessicasaenzhrd.weebly.com€¦ · Web viewHuman Resource Development (HRD) was introduced to me...
Running Head: PERSONAL OBSERVATIONS OF DISTINGUISHED FACULTY 1
Personal Observations of Distinguished Faculty
Jessica Saenz
Texas A&M University
Abstract
Running Head: PERSONAL OBSERVATIONS OF DISTINGUISHED FACULTY 2
My passion for Human Resource Development rooted from my sincere interest in helping peo-
ple. As a Psychology major in Undergrad my hope was to one day have an impact on people, by
transforming their lives in a positive manner. Human Resource Development (HRD) was intro-
duced to me through a class called Industrial and Organizational Psychology. This course im-
pacted my life in a way where I found both of my passions combined in one field, which was
HRD. None of the less, I would have to thank my Undergraduate professor for guiding me in the
right direction and for having such a positive impact on my life. Educators can impact and trans-
form a student’s life in various ways, this is why I have such appreciation for them. As I ob-
served these two distinguished faculty from Texas A&M University, I was able to see the quali-
ties these professors transmitted to their students. Most importantly these professors transmitted
a passion for teaching and learning, which was clearly demonstrated through the conducted ob-
servations.
Hector Rivera, PhD
Running Head: PERSONAL OBSERVATIONS OF DISTINGUISHED FACULTY 3
Professor Hector Rivera is currently a professor at Texas A&M University in the Depart-
ment of Educational Psychology. Dr. Rivera has an extensive background. He graduated from
the University of California Santa Cruz with a Bachelors in Psychology with an emphasis on
Cultural Diversity. Four years later he received his Masters degree in Applied Educational Re-
search, and then he went along and graduated with his Doctoral degree in Developmental Psy-
chology from the same institution. He has previous teaching experience as a bilingual teacher in
the North Monterey District in Santa Cruz, California. He was a Program Developer and Evalua-
tor for the Society of Advancement of Chicanos and Native American in Science. He later be-
came an Adjunct Faculty member at the University of St. Thomas in Houston, TX. As his career
started to boom in the early 2000s, he took his first role as an Assistant Professor (research
track) in the Simmons School of Human Development at Southern Methodist University and
from the School of Psychology and Scientific Advisor for Texas Institute for Measurement Eval-
uation and Statistics at the University of Houston. He is currently on the tenure track here at
Texas A&M University.
Dr. Rivera has been recognized in many manners. I would like to mention a couple of his
most recent honors and awards. The following are some of his most recent recognitions: National
Center for Research on Education Diversity and Excellence/ Post-Doctoral fellowship, Dallas
and Fort Worth International Community Alliance: Outstanding New Americans Recognition,
Nominated for the Golden Mustang Award at Southern Methodist University (an award for
teaching excellence), NIH Grant Writing Course that is funded through the Educational Psychol-
ogy department, the Undergraduate Students Research Initiative, and the League of Champions
of Education Award. Through his research, he is constantly trying to find innovative ways to
promote parental and community involvement and development. He is searching for new strate-
Running Head: PERSONAL OBSERVATIONS OF DISTINGUISHED FACULTY 4
gies that can benefit the classroom learning environment, he has focused on resident and non-re-
silient Hispanic students, socio-cultural factors for the development of effective educational pro-
grams, research-based programs for English language learners in the schooling process, and a fo-
cus on developing instruments to measure flushing learning environments in rural school class-
rooms. As a well-rounded educator, Dr. Rivera is involved in his community as a volunteer and
he has also taken multiple roles as a mentor.
I am fortunate enough to personally know Dr. Rivera. I have not had the opportunity to
take one of his courses, but his charisma, passion for teaching and education, and his ability to
connect with students caught my attention as a student worker. I would pass by his office and he
would greet you in such a unique manner. I grew up to see Dr. Rivera as a mentor. I had heard
many great things about his courses, nonetheless it was true. As I entered Dr. Rivera’s classroom,
he gave me a full introduction and he introduced me to his class.
He just has this way of making his students feel special in such a genuine way. I observed
his BIED: 632 course called Bilingual Educational Applied Research. There were only five stu-
dents in his class, due to this being a higher level course designated for mainly doctoral students
interested in conducting research. As I immersed myself in his in class, I felt as if I was a part of
his class the first day I set foot in his classroom. I enjoyed hearing his perspective on the future
outlook of education. He provides his students with a future outlook on life, education, and re-
search. He provides his students with the questions necessary to spark their interest in field, he
also provides real world examples for students to make the connection. I experienced an open-
ness to express your personal option and to question the facts, a more discussion based environ-
ment, a personal concern for his students progression through his course, an openness to hear
what his students have to say, and an interest in hearing the diverse perspectives of his students.
Running Head: PERSONAL OBSERVATIONS OF DISTINGUISHED FACULTY 5
The students had as much of an impact on his life, as he does on theirs. He clearly states this. Dr.
Rivera first provides the students with a lecture of the topic that is going to be discuss for the
three-hour class. After his lecture he provides the students a time for them to individually present
their personal thoughts on what has been previously discussed. The portion of the class incorpo-
rates his weekly projects. His weekly projects consists of each student providing a hands-on
project that ties in the articles that were assigned to the class. This was quite interesting.
What I most admired about Dr. Rivera is his patience. His patience to get to know each
student at a personal level and to truly care about that student’s development. He truly wants the
students to learn something out of his course, and this is something he continually mentions. He
wants them to not have fear of him or the course. Real world experiences are mentioned through-
out his lecture in order for the students to connect how this material can be applied in the actual
field. He is all about application, application in the field. A variation of teaching methods are
provided in order for the student to get a grasp of the concepts one way or another. Dr. Rivera is
not the type of professor to stand right next to the board for the entire class. He is very expressive
and demonstrates much excitement through his body language. I could only imagine what it was
like to be a doctoral student in that classroom. I felt as if I was one for those couple of days. Dr.
Rivera definitely knows what it is like to be a researcher, a professor, a graduate assistant, a stu-
dent, a brother, etc. He puts himself in their shoes and creates a beautiful bond with each and ev-
ery single one of them. This professor definitely demonstrated two of the teaching styles we had
recently read about in the Five Perspectives on Teaching in Adult and Higher Education. I ana-
lyzed him as a developmental and nurturing professor. If I had to pick one, I would say he
demonstrated more developmental characteristics. The two key ideas underlying the develop-
mental perspectives were presented on his behalf: how to come to understand something and the
Running Head: PERSONAL OBSERVATIONS OF DISTINGUISHED FACULTY 6
relationship between teaching and learning. (Pratt, 1998) This professor had more of a focus on
the development of the learners’ thinking, reasoning, and judgment rather than on specific teach-
ing performance. He also provided more of a focus on helping learners connect with a more per-
sonal meaning. (Pratt, 1998) As mentioned in the Five Perspectives on Teaching in Adult and
Higher Education, “the developmental perspective emphasizes a qualitative change in learners
rather than a quantitative one; learning has to do with knowing differently rather than knowing
more. (Pratt, 1998) After observing and analyzing Dr. Rivera’s examples, personal stories, reflec-
tions, questioning strategy, classroom atmosphere, and students’ feedback, his perspective on ed-
ucation and on life, and by his way of approaching concepts from different angles: I portrayed
his teaching style to be Developmental.
As previously discussed in our online discussions, the developmental perspective is quite
challenging when it comes to creating thought provoking questioning strategies for your learners
and creating innovative ways of assessing your students. Those are just a couple of areas where
people struggle with this style of teaching. The developmental perspective can set an impact on
the learner’s way of thinking and their overall learning experience. I personally enjoy this type of
teaching style, I have had wonderful experiences with professors that teach in this style of in-
struction. They have had an impact on my life and they will always be remembered as one of my
best professors in college.
Alain Lawo-Sukam, PhD
Dr. Alain Lawo-Sukam is an Assistant Professor of Hispanic and African Studies. He
holds a Ph.D. in Spanish from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. His area of con-
centration is in Hispanic Studies with a specialty in Afro-Hispanic literature and culture. He is
Running Head: PERSONAL OBSERVATIONS OF DISTINGUISHED FACULTY 7
the author of Hacia Una Poética Afro-Colombiana: El Caso del Pacífico (2010) and a creative
writing book called Sueño con África. Rêve d’Afrique (2013). He is the author of several articles
and book reviews published in national and international peer reviewed journals. He is also a
member of the editorial boards of The Coastal Review, Advances in Literary Study, L’ Érudit
Franco-Española, and has served as manuscript reviewer for Callaloo, Revista Canadiense de Es-
tudios Hispánicos, Revistas de Estudios de Literatura Colombiana, Revista de Literatura, Teoría
y Crítica and the College of Arts in the University of El Valle (Colombia). He is a recipient of
numerous grants and awards; among the recent are the Hispanic Studies Research Enhancement
and High Impact Research Grants, the Texas A&M University System Teaching Excellence
Award, CLA Faculty Research Enhancement, CLA Summer Institute for Instructional Technol-
ogy Innovation, GCHR/RESI Stipendiary Faculty Fellow and the PESCA. He was elected for
five years as a member of the Executive Committee of the Modern Language Association, where
he served as Secretary and Chair of the African Division.
I observed Dr. Lawo-Sukam’s, Spanish 312: Hispanic Culture of the 18th century to
Present course. This course is a three credit hour course that is held weekly on Wednesdays and
Fridays from 9am-10:10am. As I was walking down the hall of the Academic building on cam-
pus in search of his classroom I started to hear music as I got closer and closer to it. As I finally
arrived to Dr. Lawo-Sukam’s classroom, I felt that I had entered a whole different world. I felt
that I was on a beach in Puerto Rico holding an ice cold lemonade and listening to some Latin
vibes. Dr. Lawo-Sukam literally transforms his classroom. It was an amazing experience. He
started off his daily class schedule with detailed course objectives, a morning welcome, he then
lectured for about twenty-five minutes, turned it over to the class for class discussions, and he
Running Head: PERSONAL OBSERVATIONS OF DISTINGUISHED FACULTY 8
then summarized what was learned in class that day. By a morning welcome, I am referring to
the “Say hello to someone you don’t know” activity.
Each student in his class is required to greet and talk to someone they do not know in the
class. They have to do this for about five minutes at the beginning of each class period. I was
personally approached and greeted by one of his students. I learned a bit about her and most im-
portantly I was touched by the impact a simple greeting can have on your early morning start. In
regards to the class discussions, he approached this teaching method quite differently. From the
beginning of the semester each student is selected to participate in a particular group. They are
divided into six groups that hold five students each. Each group of five students and has one
leader. Throughout the semester each group is assigned a weekly reading. The group is responsi-
ble to analyze the material and provide a written summary over the content. All five member of
the group are then responsible to create a short presentation over the material learned. Once they
have concluded with the presentation they break off into smaller groups with their peers. Each
group member is placed with a small group of students. These group members then start a dis-
cussion with their small groups and then they will eventually present their learnings to the whole
class. The curve ball in this approach is that each group member grades the students in their
group in regards to their participation in their small group discussion.
According to Dr. Lawo-Sukam, this creates a sense of accountability and responsibility
on the students’ behalf. If not, they will most likely will not read the assigned readings. Through-
out these discussion Dr. Lawo-Sukam provides informal and formal feedback to his students. He
goes around the classroom spreading good vibes and making connections with his students. He
absolutely makes the class enjoyable, engaging, and relatable to the student’s day to day life.
Running Head: PERSONAL OBSERVATIONS OF DISTINGUISHED FACULTY 9
In my opinion Dr. Lawo-Sukam’s teaching style reflected that of the Nurturing perspec-
tive. His style of teaching encompassed meaningful engagement between the learner and the con-
tent. (Pratt, 1998) This professor practiced empathy, he was able to perceive the emotive and re-
active states of the learner with a general understanding that include both intellect and the emo-
tion. This professor was able to develop ways of interrupting cues given by learners, and replace
the externally based areas that delineated success in alternate perspectives (Pratt, 1998). From
what I observed, this professor viewed his class and his course content in this perspective. As
mentioned in Contemporary Viewpoints on Teaching Adults Effectively, this perspective assumes
that long-term, diligent, persistent efforts to achieve come from the heart, not the head. (Gordon,
2002). Dr. Lawo-Kuham’s classroom strategies and activities matched some of the characteristics
of the Nurturing perspectives. Contemporary Viewpoints on Teaching Adults Effectively, men-
tioned how the typical nurturing strategy includes such simple things as getting to know people,
consistently listening and responding to emotional as well as intellectual needs. (Gordon, 2002).
This particular quote reminded me of the “Say hello to someone you don’t know” activity and
how he facilities his class discussions. Most of the students in his class provide personal experi-
ences and this has created a safe environment for students to share scenarios that are more close
to them.
Overall, this was a very engaging and hands-on experience. I was able to tie what was re-
cently learned in our past lessons and I was able to connect it to the conducted observations. The
Developmental perspective is the one teaching style I was most familiar with and which I was
able to relate to the most during these observations. The Nurturing perspective was fairly new to
me. I had not had any previous experiences with this perspective. I will have to admit that I en-
joyed it way more than I anticipated. I mention this because throughout our discussions of the
Running Head: PERSONAL OBSERVATIONS OF DISTINGUISHED FACULTY 10
Nurturing perspective, I did not see it aligning to my educational philosophy and educational val-
ues. I felt as if it was too lenient. I was wrong, it was as engaging and informative as some of the
other methods. I do have to say that this perspective is tough to preform, and it should be per-
formed as efficiently as possible in order for the students to receive the most out of it. I also be-
lieve that the overall nature of the two courses observed aligned with the perspectives observed.
The courses were appropriate for those type of perspectives, because of the material being pre-
sented. It required much more brainstorming, discussion, and analyzing in comparison to courses
in the math, science, and engineering field for example. I enjoyed observing these two courses
because I was able to experience the transmission of the passion and dedication these two profes-
sors have for their profession and for their field of study.
REFERENCES:
Gordon, J. (2002). Contemporary viewpoints on teaching adults effectively. San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
Pratt, D. (1998). Five Perspectives on Teaching Adults and Higher Education (Original ED.).
Malabar, FLA.: Krieger Pub.