harisportal.hanken.fi · Web viewThis is the post-print version (author’s manuscript as accepted...
Transcript of harisportal.hanken.fi · Web viewThis is the post-print version (author’s manuscript as accepted...
Short Brand Stories on Packaging: An Examination of Consumer Responses
This is the post-print version (author’s manuscript as accepted for publishing after the review process but prior to final layout and copyediting) of the article.Solja E., Liljander V., & Söderlund M. (2018) Short brand stories on packaging: An examination of consumer responses. Psychology and Marketing 35:294–306. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21087Readers are kindly asked to use the official publication in references. This version is stored in the Institutional Repository of the Hanken School of Economics, DHanken.
Short Brand Stories on Packaging: An Examination of
Consumer Responses
AUTHOR DETAILS
Author 1, Corresponding AuthorName: Eeva SoljaDepartment: Department of Marketing, CERSUniversity: Hanken School of EconomicsCity, country: Helsinki, FinlandTel.: +358 50 5020 501E-mail: [email protected]
Author 2 Name: Veronica LiljanderDepartment: Department of Marketing, CERSUniversity: Hanken School of EconomicsCity, country: Helsinki, FinlandTel.: +358 40 352 1288E-mail: [email protected]
Author 3 Name: Magnus SöderlundDepartment: Center for Consumer MarketingUniversity: Stockholm School EconomicsCity, country: Stockholm, SwedenDepartment: Department of Marketing, CERSUniversity: Hanken School of EconomicsCity, country: Helsinki, FinlandTel.: +46 8 736 9541E-mail: [email protected]
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe authors acknowledge with thanks the two companies (that wish to stay anonymous) for their
1
Short Brand Stories on Packaging: An Examination of Consumer Responses
cooperation in terms of granting access to their packaging material. They also thank the P&M
editor and anonymous reviewers for their helpful suggestions on previous versions of the article.
2
Short Brand Stories on Packaging: An Examination of Consumer Responses
Short Brand Stories on Packaging: An Examination of Consumer
Responses
ABSTRACT
The persuasiveness of stories and their influence on consumers have been acknowledged in
marketing, particularly within the advertising field. In marketing practice, brand stories are
increasingly also appearing on product packages. However, packages differ from ads in
significant ways as communication channels; for example, the space for messages on a package is
limited by the size of the package. This study reports findings from two experiments comparing
consumer responses to fast-moving consumer good (FMCG) packages with and without short
brand stories. The findings show that even a short brand story included on FMCG packaging has
a positive impact on consumers’ affective, attitudinal, product value, and behavioral intention
responses to the brand.
Keywords: Brand Story, Packaging, FMCG, Experiment, Consumer Brand Responses
3
Short Brand Stories on Packaging: An Examination of Consumer Responses
INTRODUCTION
Stories are ubiquitous. They are embedded in consumers’ social and cultural environment and
have been told throughout civilizations (Barthes, 1975). Consumers think in terms of stories
(Bruner, 1986; Schank, 1990) and communicate everyday events in a story-like manner, giving
them a beginning, a climax, a low point, and an ending (Gergen & Gergen, 1988). In fact, stories
reflect the fundamental structure by which consumers make sense of and organize their
experiences (Bruner, 1986; Egan, 1989; Polkinghorne, 1988; Sax, 2006; Shankar, Elliott, &
Goulding, 2001).
Several authors have stressed the persuasive potential of stories in marketing (e.g., Busselle
& Bilandzic, 2008; McGregor & Holmes, 1999; McKee, 2003; Woodside, 2010). Consumers are
known to construct stories in relation to brands (Megehee & Woodside, 2010; Woodside, Sood,
& Miller, 2008) and to react positively to brand stories (Chiu, Hsieh, & Kuo, 2012; Escalas,
2004b; Lundqvist, Liljander, Gummerus, & van Riel, 2013). Thus it is not surprising that firms
increasingly seek to persuade consumers with stories. The use of brand stories on product
packaging, in particular, is a rapidly expanding practice in contemporary brand-building.
However, packages bring challenges to storytelling that have not hitherto been studied.
Packages differ from other storytelling media in four respects. First, the space for messages
on a package is limited by the size of the package. This means that the story has to be short. In
comparison to TV commercials and printed ads, which also generally require short stories
(Brechman & Purvis, 2015; Söderlund & Dahlén, 2010), FMCG packages have to include
information required by laws and regulations (e.g., nutrition labels). This reduces the potential
length of the story. Second, the presence of additional information may have an impact on how
consumers attend to and process the story. Third, given that the typical place for the consumer’s
4
Short Brand Stories on Packaging: An Examination of Consumer Responses
exposure to packages is in the store, the time and space between exposure to a message and an
actual purchase is much shorter for packages. Fourth, many packages offer more contact points
than ads vis-à-vis the consumer, particularly with respect to packages that are stored in
consumers’ homes and are subject to repeated use in households.
Existing studies have not examined how consumers respond to very short stories, and
especially stories on packages, where the story competes with other product information. The
particular characteristics of the package as a vehicle for story transmission mean that previous
findings regarding stories for commercial purposes may not apply to a packaging setting.
Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate, in a FMCG setting, how consumers’
affective, attitudinal, product value, and behavioral intention responses to the brand are affected
by packages with short brand stories. Two experimental studies were carried out to assess these
aspects.
An examination of this type offers several contributions. First, the study provides
knowledge of consumer responses to short brand stories on packaging. Hitherto no studies have
examined the effects of stories on packaging, which differs significantly from traditional means
of communication in the ways outlined above. That is to say, in marketing-related research,
product packages have received little attention as story transmitters, because most existing
empirical studies have been conducted in an advertising context (e.g., Phillips & McGuarrie,
2010; Polyorat, Alden, & Kim, 2007; Söderlund & Dahlén, 2010; Wentzel, Tomczak, &
Herrmann, 2010). However, packaging is an influential marketing vehicle (Underwood &
Ozanne, 1998). Packaging design is recognized as an important way to capture consumers’
attention, and it directly influences both their purchase intentions (Schoormans & Robben, 1997;
Underwood, 1999; Underwood, 2003) and buying decisions (e.g., Little & Orth, 2013; Raghubir
& Greenleaf, 2006; Silayoi & Speece, 2007). Packaging is particularly important for FMCGs due
5
Short Brand Stories on Packaging: An Examination of Consumer Responses
to its ability to effectively differentiate one product from another (Simms & Trott, 2014). This
suggests that packaging is a powerful means of communication with the potential to convey
stories to consumers.
Second, the present study, in contrast to previous studies, deals with the effects of short
brand stories (shorter than 100 words). A main assumption is that the absorbing potential of
stories makes it likely that even a short brand story included in FMCG packaging can have a
positive impact on consumers’ responses. Previous findings on consumer responses to stories in
other contexts have been based on longer stories, ranging from 121 words to one page of text
(e.g., Polyorat, Alden, & Kim, 2007; Peracchio & Meyers-Levy, 1997.
Finally, the present study widens the application context of previous findings by examining
FMCGs from the low-involvement product category. Previous empirical studies on storytelling
conducted in an advertising context have mainly focused on high-involvement goods, such as
fashion or cosmetics products (Ching, Tong, Chen, & Chen, 2013; Escalas, 2007; Phillips &
McGuarrie, 2010), sports accessories (Escalas, 2004a; Escalas, 2007), glasses and contact lenses
(Chang C. , 2009; Polyorat, Alden, & Kim, 2007), and electronics items (Ching, Tong, Chen, &
Chen, 2013; Escalas, 2004b; Lien & Chen, 2013; Polyorat, Alden, & Kim, 2007). Thus there is a
paucity of studies on low-involvement and fast-moving goods (Lien & Chen, 2013).
CONCEPTUAL BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESES
“Growing up, my mom taught me the importance of eating organic and understanding food
labels. She was very sick, and doing both restored her health. To cheer us up, my dad brought
home a rabbit. Soon, we had 18 rabbits hopping around. As a mom today, those memories
inspire the wholesome recipes I create in my kitchen for you.
Alison”
6
Short Brand Stories on Packaging: An Examination of Consumer Responses
The story above, a text on an 18 Rabbits Granola bar wrap, is a representative example of a short
brand story on a package. Marketers communicate such brand stories on packages to an
increasing extent. Yet, their effects of on consumers’ responses have been neglected by extant
research.
What is a Brand Story?
Here, a brand story is defined based on elements used by past advertising studies that examine
consumer responses to brand stories: a brand story conveys information about the brand through
a plot consisting of events that are carried out by actors and arranged based on theme, causality,
and temporality (Adaval & Wyer, 1998; Escalas, 2004a; Padgett & Allen, 1997; Polyorat, Alden,
& Kim, 2007; Wentzel, Tomczak, & Herrmann, 2010). A brand story might for instance convey
information about the brand’s creator and evolution (Polyorat, Alden, & Kim, 2007) or it might
include characters that interact with the brand, consume it, or enjoy the consequences of its use
(Boller & Olson, 1991).
In a story, the characters are the main agents of activity in terms of doing, feeling, and
thinking (Adaval & Wyer, 1998; Escalas, 2004a; Padgett & Allen, 1997; Polyorat, Alden, &
Kim, 2007; Wentzel, Tomczak, & Herrmann, 2010). Their actions are motivated by goals, lead to
outcomes, and occur in settings that have “physical, social, and temporal components” (Padgett
& Allen, 1997, p. 53). Causal links are thereby built between events. Given that the events in a
story are ordered in a temporal dimension, the story has a beginning, a middle, and an end
(Gergen & Gergen, 1988; Shankar, Elliott, & Goulding, 2001). However, a temporal ordering of
the events does not necessarily involve a chronological order (Polyorat, Alden, & Kim, 2007).
A brand story should further express values of the brand that resonate with a target
audience (Fog, Budtz, Munch, & Blanchette, 2010; Jensen, 1999) in order to build a strong link
7
Short Brand Stories on Packaging: An Examination of Consumer Responses
to the brand’s core business objective and strategy. For the story to touch consumers, the values
should be important to them.
Taken together, then, a brand story is a company-designed story about the brand and
consists of a plot, actors, causality, and temporality.
The Short Brand Story
How short can a story be before it ceases to be a story? Consider this story, allegedly the shortest
story in the world, by Honduran writer Augusto Monterroso: “Upon awakening, the dinosaur was
still there.” If a story can comprise only one sentence, there should obviously be room for
storytelling on FMCG packages.
Existing stories on packages are indeed short. The present authors examined 13 packages
from two FMCG product categories (beer and ice cream) with story content, and the result was an
average story length of 43 words. The shortest brand story had a length of 12 words, and the
longest had 73 words. The stories on FMCG packaging typically describe the invention of the
brand, the founder, the history of the company, or the craftsmanship with which the products are
made as well as the origin of the ingredients. It should be noted that academic research on the
effects of stories in advertising settings does not always report exact story lengths. The studies
that do so have studied stories with lengths from 121 (Polyorat, Alden, & Kim, 2007) to 319
words (Chang, 2009) or longer, for instance, a full page of written text (Peracchio & Meyers‐Levy, 1997). In any event, in the present study, a brand story of any length is defined as a brand
story as long as it consists of a plot, actors, causality, and temporality.
Some authors have argued that short stories are unlikely to be able to transport the
consumer into a fully absorbed state of mind – something considered to be a requirement if
stories are to have maximal persuasive potential (Busselle & Bilandzic, 2008). However, it can be
8
Short Brand Stories on Packaging: An Examination of Consumer Responses
argued that all humans have story schemas (Mandler, 1978). That is to say, we possess “abstract
knowledge about the structure of stories” (Escalas, 1998, p. 273), which we can use to make
assumptions about how a story unfolds, even based on limited clues (Stern, 1994). This means
that not all story elements (plot, actors, causality, and temporality) need to be explicitly present in
the story in order to be defined and processed as a story. That is to say, a missing element may be
implied by the story’s structure. Given such story schemas, and given also the strong position of
the story as a natural mode for information processing (Woodside, Sood, & Miller, 2008), it is
assumed here that even a short story is likely to induce a degree of narrative transportation
(which is assumed to be the point of departure for effects on subsequent consumer responses).
Consequences of Short Brand Stories: Hypotheses
A central tenet in the present study is that the form used to structure information about a product
or a brand has an impact on how consumers process and evaluate that information (Adval &
Wyer, 1998). When information takes the form of a story, the consumer is prone to process the
information in a narrative manner (Bruner, 1986). However, when the same information is
presented, for instance, as a list of attributes, other processing forms are more likely to be
triggered. Given that the information is indeed presented in terms of a story, it is expected that the
first response is narrative processing, which is followed by several other responses. These
responses are discussed below, and the specific hypotheses to be tested in the subsequent
empirical studies are presented.
Narrative transportation. A first response assumption is that a brand story on a FMCG
packaging has the ability to elicit narrative transportation through narrative processing. In
narrative processing, the consumer arranges the information in the story narratively based on
temporality and causality (Escalas, 1998). This style of processing is congruent with consumers’
9
Short Brand Stories on Packaging: An Examination of Consumer Responses
natural way of thinking and storing information (Bruner, 1986; Schank, 1990). Information
processed in a narrative manner is more easily assimilated and accepted by a consumer (Bruner,
1986; Schank & Abelson, 1995). The narrative mode of thought can lead to absorption, a state
characterized by focused immersion, involvement, and dissociation from the surrounding
environment (Söderlund & Sagfossen, 2015). Transportation is an intensive form of absorption
and is defined as a distinct mental process where the consumer is carried away by the story to the
degree that she or he is “lost” in it (Green & Brock, 2000, p. 701).
Green and Brock (2000) argue that transportation is particularly likely to occur when the
purpose of story consumption is enjoyment. Nevertheless, transportation has been used as a point
of departure in several studies examining how consumers process advertising stories, and
occurrences of transportation have been shown in this setting (e.g., Brechman & Purvis, 2015;
Chang, 2009; Ching, Tong, Chen, & Chen, 2013; Escalas, 2004b). Transportation among
consumers has also been observed as a result of salespeople’s storytelling in face-to-face
encounters (Gilliam & Flaherty, 2015). The message form, rather than the aim of the story
consumption, thus seems to be the key element in inducing transportation. It therefore seems
likely that consumers can be transported by messages (a) presented in the form of stories in a
packaging context with (b) the intention to persuade. Based on this, the following is
hypothesized:
H1a: A short brand story on a product package produces a higher level of narrative
transportation as opposed to the absence of a story.
Critical thoughts. Argument-based processing is considered to be the opposite of narrative
processing (Escalas, 2004a). Argument-based processing is more analytical, logical, and
pragmatic than narrative processing (Green & Brock, 2000) and may be triggered by arguments
or fact-based messages (Deighton, Romer, & Mcqueen, 1989). In an advertising context, story
10
Short Brand Stories on Packaging: An Examination of Consumer Responses
effects have been examined by contrasting advertisements in story form to advertisements based
on arguments or facts about product features. Fact-based ads are assumed to trigger an argument-
based processing style (Brecheman & Purvis, 2015; Chang, 2009; Deighton, Romer, & Mcqueen,
1989). These types of ads have also been referred to as informational ads (Boller, 1990; Puto &
Wells, 1984), expository ads (Wentzel, Tomczak, & Herrmann, 2010), factual ads (Peracchio &
Meyers‐Levy, 1997; Polyorat, Alden, & Kim, 2007), or list-based ads (Adaval & Wyer, 1998) in
previous research. In the present study, a package including a short brand story is contrasted both
with a package with a list-formed message (Study 1) and a package without a story (Study 2).
The key distinction between a story form and a list form in the present study is that a list is not
narrated or based on temporality, nor does it have a plot or characters.
When argument-based processing is triggered, the consumer is prone to consider the
strength of the arguments in an objective manner (Adaval & Wyer, 1998). This process increases
the likelihood of creating counterarguments (Escalas, 2004a). Yet this effect is inverted in the
case of narrative transportation, because transportation has been shown to reduce critical thoughts
(Brechman & Purvis, 2015; Escalas, 2004a; Gilliam & Flaherty, 2015). Presumably, one factor
contributing to this is the fact that transportation is typically a positively valenced state of mind
that consumers enjoy experiencing (Söderlund & Sagfossen, 2015), and critical thinking may
offset the transportation into the story. Given a higher level of transportation in the presence of a
story, then, the following can be expected:
H1b: A short brand story on a product package produces a lower level of critical
thoughts as opposed to the absence of a story.
H1a and H1b can be seen in the light of two classical routes to persuasion, namely the
central and the peripheral route (Petty, Cacioppo, & Schumann, 1983). In a marketing message
context, the central route comprises contemplative consideration of arguments and attributes
11
Short Brand Stories on Packaging: An Examination of Consumer Responses
related to the object of the message, whereas the peripheral route entails a simpler process
involving positive and negative cues to the object of the message (Petty, Cacioppo, & Schumann,
1983). Narrative processing may be considered as an extension of the peripheral route to
persuasion, while argument-based processing can be seen as an extension of the central route to
persuasion.
Affective, attitudinal, and product value responses. Building further on the assumption
that a brand story has the ability to elicit a narrative mode of thought, and thereby narrative
transportation, several affective and attitudinal responses are likely to follow. Given that the story
message is positively charged, previous studies indicate that an ad message presented in the form
of a story enhances positive affect, such as upbeat and warm feelings (Escalas, 1998; Escalas &
Stern, 2003; Escalas, 2004a). This may be attributed to the story form’s use of characters (i.e.,
humans), because humans seem to be hardwired to react positively to the presence of other
humans (Sears, 1983). In addition, consumers who are exposed to a story are, as a result of
transportation, inclined to experience positive emotions (Green & Brock, 2000; Green, Brock, &
Kaufman, 2004). Hence the following is hypothesized:
H2: A short brand story on a product package produces a higher level of positive
affect as opposed to the absence of a story.
Previous studies indicate that brand stories may have a positive effect on brand attitude (e.g.,
Brechman & Purvis, 2015; Chiu, Hsieh, & Kuo, 2012; Escalas, 2004a and 2004b; Lundqvist,
Liljander, Gummerus, & van Riel, 2013). This might stem from the fact that stories are perceived
as an interesting, entertaining, and enjoyable form of communication (Busselle & Bilandzic,
2008; Green, Brock, & Kaufman, 2004; Lundqvist, Liljander, Gummerus, & van Riel, 2013), and
these perceptions are likely to have a positive influence on consumers’ attitudes toward the brand
(Escalas, 1998). Other story-related factors have also been proposed to influence brand attitudes
12
Short Brand Stories on Packaging: An Examination of Consumer Responses
favorably. First, transported consumers show more story-consistent and less critical beliefs as
opposed to their less-transported counterparts (Escalas, 1998; Escalas, 2004a). These responses
indicated a direct positive influence on brand attitude (Escalas, 2004a). Second, the positive
emotions elicited by narrative transportation are likely to spill over to brand attitude in
accordance with the affect infusion model (Forgas, 1994 and 1995). This implies that narrative
transportation and positive affect may further enhance the development of a positive brand
attitude. The following is therefore hypothesized:
H3: A short brand story on a product package produces a higher level of brand
attitude as opposed to the absence of a story.
Moreover, stories have been shown to have (1) a positive impact on consumers’ willingness
to pay for the brand (Lundqvist, Liljander, Gummerus, & van Riel, 2013) and (2) a potential to
attenuate price sensitivity (Chiu, Hsieh, & Kuo, 2012). These variables are conceptually linked to
perceived value (Netemeyer, et al., 2004). It may be assumed, then, that a story can have a
positive impact on product perceived value. This effect may be partly attributed to the same
antecedents as those of brand attitude. In any event, it is expected that stories in a packaging
context can have an impact on consumers’ perceived value with regard to the packaged product:
H4: A short brand story on a product package produces a higher level of perceived
value as opposed to the absence of a story.
Behavioral intention responses. Brand stories have been shown to elicit a higher likelihood
of purchase than other forms of communication (Brechman & Purvis, 2015; Escalas, Moore, &
Britton, 2004; Escalas, 2004b; Lundqvist, Liljander, Gummerus, & van Riel, 2013). This may
stem from the way in which the information in a story is judged. Given that knowledge is stored
in a narrative form in memory, new story-based information is matched with existing knowledge.
It makes the consumer prone to consider the information in the story as a whole (through
13
Short Brand Stories on Packaging: An Examination of Consumer Responses
narrative processing) instead of fragmenting it into detached pieces of information to be judged
separately (Pennington & Hastie, 1992; Schank & Abelson, 1995). When information on a
product or brand is considered and subsequently judged as a whole, the information becomes
easy to grasp and hence appears instinctively correct and coherent (Pennington & Hastie, 1992).
Stories may, through this mechanism, have a positive effect on consumers’ purchasing decisions
(Adaval & Wyer, 1998). In addition, several studies show that brand attitude (cf. H3) is
positively associated with purchase intentions in a communication context (e.g., Spears & Singh,
2004). Therefore, the following is expected:
H5a: A short brand story on a product package produces a higher level of purchase
intentions as opposed to the absence of a story.
Given that positive judgments affect purchase intentions positively, it might be assumed
that such judgments also have an impact on other consumption-related behavioral intentions. One
intention type that occurs with particularly high frequency in the consumer-related literature is
word-of-mouth intentions, and it has been suggested that stories are likely to positively impact
such intentions (Gilliam & Flaherty, 2015). The following is thus hypothesized:
H5b: A short brand story on a product package produces a higher level of word-of-
mouth intentions as opposed to the absence of a story.
Two empirical studies were conducted to test the hypotheses. Both comprised an
experimental design in which a package with a short brand story and a package without such a
story served as stimuli.
STUDY 1
Study 1 was designed to address hypotheses H1-H5 by exposing participants to either a package
including a short brand story or a package with the same content presented in a list format.
14
Short Brand Stories on Packaging: An Examination of Consumer Responses
Research Method
A between-subjects experimental design was used. The participants were randomly allocated to
the story condition (short brand story) and the list condition. The responses were measured with
questionnaire items.
The packaged product in Study 1 was a muesli product produced and sold within one
particular country. The main share of the brand’s turnover comes from muesli products, but the
range also includes ecological grain products produced for the national grocery market. The
muesli package had a story printed on the back. At the time when Study 1 was conducted, a
handful of other muesli brands in the focal market also used stories on their packaging.
Stimulus Development
In Study 1, the authentic package including a brand story was used as the stimulus for the story
condition. This brand story is consistent with the definition of a brand story and hence consists of
a plot, actors, causality, and temporality.
The story recounts when the company was founded and points out its family business
background. The ecological and environmentally friendly production methods, as well as the
taste of the product, are also mentioned (see Appendix 1). As indicated above, the authors of the
present study collected and analyzed stories on packages to assess existing practice in using
stories on packages, and found that existing stories typically describe the invention of the brand,
the founder, or the history of the company. Typically, such stories lack a strong emotional
element and mainly address consumers’ functional needs. To empirically examine the emotional
charge of the story used in Study 1, pre-test participants (n = 22) were exposed to the story and
were asked “How emotional was the story?” (van Stegeren, Everaerd, Cahill, McGaugh, &
15
Short Brand Stories on Packaging: An Examination of Consumer Responses
Gooren, 1998). This item was rated on a scale ranging from 1 (low) to 10 (high). The result was
that the story was perceived to have a relatively low emotional content (M = 4.50, SD = 2.36).
The list-based package stimulus was developed using the authentic brand story as a starting
point. The content of the story was then converted into separate statements, and these statements
were organized in a list format (see Appendix 1). Both stimuli thus included the same
information. They were also comparable in terms of length: the story consisted of 34 words and
the list of 33 words. Hence, the only difference between the two stimuli was the way in which
information was presented.
In the next step, two versions of a photo of the muesli package were created. The photos
featured the front, back, and sides of the package. The first version showed the list on the back of
the package, whereas the second version showed the story in place of the list. In addition to this,
both versions included the regular packaging text consisting of, for example, nutritional
information, ecological considerations, and country of origin.
Procedure and Participants
Study 1 comprised an online setting. The participants were randomly allocated to view a photo of
either the story version or the list version of the package. The participants could, if needed, make
the photo visible again at any time during the study by clicking an icon. In the following step, the
participants’ responses were collected with an online questionnaire.
The participants (n = 215; Mage = 46; 102 female, 113 male) were recruited from a
consumer web panel maintained by YouGov, a market research firm specializing in panel data
and online methods. The participants consisted of a nationally representative sample in terms of
demographics such as age, gender, education, and income level. One hundred and seven
participants (50%) were exposed to the story condition, while 108 participants (50%) were
16
Short Brand Stories on Packaging: An Examination of Consumer Responses
exposed to the list condition. The muesli brand was familiar to 16 participants (8%) and
unfamiliar to 196 (91%). Three participants did not report their familiarity with the brand. A chi-
square test revealed that neither gender (p = 0.84) nor brand familiarity (p = 0.58) were subject to
differences between the two groups.
Measures
The measures are presented in full in Appendix 2. Narrative transportation was measured with
five items such as “While reading the text on the package I could easily picture the described
events taking place” and “I could picture myself in the scene described in the text on the
package” (Green & Brock, 2000; Agarwal & Karahanna, 2000). Critical thoughts were measured
by asking the participants to indicate how much they agreed with four claims about the product.
Two of the claims were subjective (“The muesli is delicious” and “The muesli is of high quality”)
and the two others were based on company-generated statements included in the packaging text
(“The muesli is environmentally friendly” and “The muesli is locally produced”). The scale for
critical thoughts was reverse coded before analysis. As a result, lower values correspond to lower
levels of critical thoughts (greater agreement with the statements on the original scale) whereas
higher values correspond to higher levels of critical thoughts (less agreement with the statements
on the original scale). Positive affect was measured with two items adapted from Berg,
Söderlund, and Lindström (2015): “I feel joyful” and “I am in a good mood.”
Brand attitude was measured with five adjective pair items, such as bad-good and
unpleasant-pleasant (Chang, 2010; Das, Duiven, Arendsen, & Vermeulen, 2014; Yi & Yoo,
2011). Perceived value was measured with four items adapted from Netemeyer et al. (2004), for
example, “What I get from ____ is worth the cost,” and “____is good value for money.”
Perceived value is typically measured in comparison with other brands (Lassar, Mittal, &
17
Short Brand Stories on Packaging: An Examination of Consumer Responses
Sharma, 1995), and in our case the participants were provided with the recommended retail price
for the focal product as well as the retail price for a corresponding private label product. Purchase
intentions were measured with three adjective pairs such as unlikely-likely and probable-
improbable (Faircloth, Capella, & Alford, 2001; Loebnitz, Schuitema, & Grunert, 2015; Tangari
& Smith, 2012). Word-of-mouth intentions was measured with the item “I intend to talk about
____ to others.” A scale ranging from 1 (low) to 10 (high) for all items was used. Cronbach’s
alpha was calculated for all variables measured with multi-item scales and ranged between 0.932
and 0.988 (see Appendix 2). The means of the items for each variable were used in the
hypotheses tests.
The manipulation was checked by asking the participants to evaluate the degree to which
they perceived the text on the package as a story. Their responses were captured on a ten-point
disagree-agree scale.
The questionnaire also contained some filler items regarding the package design
(attractiveness, color, font, etc.). Background information was collected in the end of the
questionnaire with questions about the participants’ current buying and usage habits for muesli,
brand familiarity, and demographic information. An open-ended question in the end showed that
none of the participants correctly guessed the purpose of the study (i.e., to assess the effects of a
story on brand responses).
Results
Manipulation check. The aim of the manipulation check question (“To what degree would you
define the information given on the package as a story?”) was to examine the perceived story
content. The responses to this question revealed that the perceived story content was higher for
the participants in the story condition (M = 6.43, SD = 2.13) than for the participants in the list
18
Short Brand Stories on Packaging: An Examination of Consumer Responses
condition (M = 5.80, SD = 2.51). This difference was significant (t = -1.959, p < 0.10). Thus, the
manipulation behaved as intended.
Testing the hypotheses. To test the hypotheses, the mean responses in the two groups were
computed and the differences were assessed with independent samples t tests. The effect size was
estimated with Cohen’s d. The group means for the response variables are presented in Table 1.
Insert Table 1 about here
H1a, which stated that a short brand story on a product package produces a higher level of
narrative transportation as opposed to the absence of a story, was supported. The level of
narrative transportation was significantly (p < 0.05; d = 0.31) higher for the participants exposed
to the short brand story (M = 5.99, SD = 2.24) than for those exposed to the list (M = 5.31, SD =
2.16).
H1b stated that a short brand story on a product package produces a lower level of critical
thoughts as opposed to the absence of a story. The level of critical thoughts was significantly (p <
0.05; d = 0.29) lower for the participants exposed to the brand story (M = 3.18, SD = 1.69) than
for those exposed to the list (M = 3.74, SD = 2.08). The hypothesis was thus supported.
H2 proposed that a short brand story on a product package produces a higher level of
positive affect as opposed to the absence of a story. The level of positive affect was significantly
(p < 0.05; d = 0.34) higher (M = 6.93, SD = 1.91) in the story group as opposed to the list group
(M = 6.21, SD = 2.33). H2 was therefore confirmed.
H3, which proposed that a short brand story on a product package produces a higher level
of brand attitude as opposed to the absence of a story, was supported (p < 0.01; d = 0.38). The
level of brand attitude was higher for the participants exposed to the brand story (M = 7.43, SD =
1.88) than for those exposed to the list (M = 6.67, SD = 2.17).
19
Short Brand Stories on Packaging: An Examination of Consumer Responses
H4 proposed that a short brand story on a product package produces a higher level of
perceived value as opposed to the absence of a story. The participants exposed to the brand story
showed a significantly (p < 0.05; d = 0.35) higher level of perceived value (M = 6.66, SD = 2.45)
compared to those who were exposed to the list (M = 5.79, SD = 2.57).
H5a and H5b pertained to behavioral intention responses. The participants exposed to a
short brand story showed a higher level of purchase intentions (M = 6.09, SD = 3.09) and word-
of-mouth intentions (M = 4.73, SD = 2.86) as opposed to the participants exposed to the list (M =
5.56, SD = 3.00 and M = 3.84, SD = 2.76, respectively). The difference in purchase intentions,
however, was not significant (p > 0.10; d = 0.17), thus H5a was not supported. The difference in
word-of-mouth intentions was significant (p < 0.05; d = 0.32), which provides support for H5b.
Discussion
The package with a short brand story produced higher levels of narrative transportation, critical
thoughts, positive affect, brand attitude, perceived value, and word-of-mouth intentions than the
package with the same information presented in a list format. Thus, even though the package
story was short, was received in a setting involving other competing text, and had a relatively low
emotional charge, the story was able to enhance several consumer responses.
Study 1, however, had some limitations. First, Study 1 comprised only one particular
FMCG brand. Previous research, however, indicates that consumers’ in-store decision processes
vary across product categories (Hoyer, 1984), thus stressing the need to examine products from
different categories. Therefore, in Study 2, a brand from another FMCG category (laundry
detergent) was chosen. Study 2 should therefore be seen as an attempt to replicate the findings
from Study 1 under different conditions.
20
Short Brand Stories on Packaging: An Examination of Consumer Responses
Second, Study 1 compared a short story with a list condition, because some previous
studies have assessed the potential of stories in relation to such lists. Another alternative,
however, is to compare the story condition with a no-story condition (i.e., an identical package
without a story). This type of comparison was conducted in Study 2.
STUDY 2
Study 2 was designed to address hypotheses H3, H4, H5a, and H5b by comparing responses to a
package with a short story to responses to a package without a story.
Research Method
A between-subjects experiment was used to test the hypotheses. Brand story content (present vs.
absent) on a FMCG package was manipulated, and the participants’ responses were measured
with questionnaire items.
The packaged product was a liquid laundry detergent that is produced and sold within one
particular country. The visual appearance of this brand had recently been redesigned and all
packaging materials had been updated simultaneously. The brand had a strong awareness rate and
a market share of around 6% at the time when the study was conducted. In the focal national
market, no laundry care products, including the object of the study, had a story printed on the
packaging. For the purpose of this study, a package story was created for the brand. The story had
not been used previously in marketing materials.
Stimulus Development
The development of the story used as a stimulus was guided by three concerns. First, as in Study
1, the story needed to conform to the definition of a brand story. That is, it needed to include a
plot, actors, causality, and temporality. Second, the story was designed to simulate the kind of
21
Short Brand Stories on Packaging: An Examination of Consumer Responses
stories that can be found on FMCG product packages in practice. Third, because a successful
company-created brand story should transmit the values of the brand (Fog, Budtz, Munch, &
Blanchette, 2010; Jensen, 1999), the story was to be built around the focal brand’s values. With
these requirements in mind, a story about the founder of the brand was created. The story
describes how the founder was inspired to develop the first product and presents the brand as
domestic and environmentally friendly (see Appendix 1). In line with many other packaging
stories on the local market, the story lacks a strong emotional element and speaks mainly to
consumers’ functional needs.
In the next step, two versions of a photo of the laundry detergent package were created. The
photos featured the front, back, and sides of the package. The first version corresponded to the
actual product package planned for the market and had no story. However, it did contain text. The
packaging text contained information on, for example, suitability for different textiles,
environmental friendliness, country of origin, and production aspects. The second version
included the same text as the first version as well as the story that was created in the previous
step. To aid the participants, each photo was accompanied by a transcript of the packaging text
with large letters.
Procedure and Participants
All participants were given the same verbal introduction; they were told that the aim of the study
was to evaluate the redesigned packaging of a laundry brand. After this introduction, the
participants were given one of the package photos and a questionnaire with items to measure the
response variables. The two versions were distributed randomly to the participants. After
completing the questionnaire, the participants were debriefed about the purpose of the study.
22
Short Brand Stories on Packaging: An Examination of Consumer Responses
The participants were recruited from courses in business administration at a business school
(n = 98; Mage = 24; 57 female, 36 male, 5 did not report gender). Business students were deemed
appropriate for the study, because they use and buy detergents. Forty-six participants (47%) were
exposed to the story version, while fifty-two participants (53%) were exposed to the version
without a story. The focal brand was familiar to 27 participants (29%) and unfamiliar to 65
(71%). Five participants did not report their familiarity with the brand. A chi-square test revealed
that neither gender (p = 0.20) nor brand familiarity (p = 0.25) were subject to differences between
the two groups.
Measures
The measures are presented in full in Appendix 2. Brand attitude, perceived value, purchase
intentions, and word-of-mouth intentions were measured with the same items used in Study 1.
However, in Study 2 a scale ranging from 1 (low) to 7 (high) for all items was used (as opposed
to a ten-point scale in Study 1) in order to examine if the Study 1 results would be replicated with
a different response format. Cronbach’s alpha was calculated for all variables measured with
multi-item scales and ranged between 0.902 and 0.933 (see Appendix 2). The summary means of
the items for each variable were used in the hypotheses tests.
Moreover, given that there are many different types of stories and many different ways to
tell a story, some measures related to the participants’ perceptions of the story per se were
included (these measures were used only for those participants who received the story version).
More specifically, story interest was measured with four items such as “I would like to know
more about ____’s story” (Machleit, Madden, & Allen, 1990 and 1993), and story entertainment
was measured with the items “entertaining,” “surprising,” and “likable” (Brewer & Lichtenstein,
1982).
23
Short Brand Stories on Packaging: An Examination of Consumer Responses
The manipulation was checked with the same question as in Study 1. That is, the
participants were asked to assess the degree to which they perceived the text on the package as a
story. In addition to this, as an instructional manipulation check (Goodman, Cryder & Cheema,
2013), the participants were asked if the packaging contained information about the founder of
the brand or not. This information was given only in the story; thus it was not available for the
participants who received the no-story treatment.
The questionnaire also contained similar filler items and background questions to those
used in Study 1. An open-ended item at the end showed that only one of the participants correctly
guessed the purpose of the study (i.e., the effect of a short story on brand responses). This
participant was excluded from further analysis.
Results
Manipulation check. The aim of the first manipulation check question (“To what degree would
you define the information given on the package as a story?”) was to examine the perceived story
content. An examination of the responses to this question showed that the perceived story content
was higher for the participants who received the story version (M = 5.11, SD = 1.25) than for the
participants who received the no-story version (M = 2.96, SD = 1.46). This difference was
significant (t = 7.78, p < 0.01). In response to the instructional manipulation check question (“Did
the packaging contain information about the founder of the brand?”), 90.1 % of the participants
exposed the story condition correctly gave an affirmative reply. The five participants who were
unable to answer correctly were excluded from further analysis.
Characteristics of the stimulus story. An analysis of the responses to the story interest and story
entertainment measures resulted in relatively low response levels; the story was only mildly
interesting (M = 3.32, SD = 1.68) and not very entertaining (M = 4.23, SD = 1.36).
24
Short Brand Stories on Packaging: An Examination of Consumer Responses
Testing the hypotheses. To test hypotheses H3-H5, the mean responses in the two groups were
computed and the differences were assessed with independent samples t tests. The effect size was
estimated with Cohen’s d. The group means for the response variables are presented in Table 2.
Insert Table 2 about here
H3, which stated that a short brand story on a product package produces a higher level of
brand attitude as opposed to the absence of a story, was supported. The brand attitude was
significantly (p < 0.01) higher for those exposed to the short brand story (M = 5.47, SD = 0.85)
than for those not exposed to the story (M = 4.67, SD = 0.89). A large effect size (d = 0.91) was
apparent.
H4 stated that a short brand story on a product package produces a higher level of perceived
value as opposed to the absence of a story. Perceived value was higher for the story group (M =
4.61, SD = 1.15) than for the group without the story (M = 4.02, SD = 1.28), and this difference
was significant (p < 0.05, d = 0.51). H4 was thus supported.
Regarding H5a, stating that a short brand story on a product package produces a higher
level of purchase intention as opposed to the absence of a story, the purchase intentions were
higher for the group exposed to the short brand story (M = 5.12, SD = 1.17) than for the group not
exposed to the story (M = 4.51, SD = 1.27). This difference was significant (p < 0.05, d = 0.50).
H5a was therefore supported.
For H5b, which stated that a short brand story on a product package produces a higher level
of word-of-mouth intentions as opposed to the absence of a story, the results were higher for the
story group (M = 2.76, SD = 1.66) than for the group without the story (M = 1.94, SD = 1.14,
respectively), and this difference was significant (p < 0.01, d = 0.58). H5b was thus supported.
25
Short Brand Stories on Packaging: An Examination of Consumer Responses
Discussion
The package with a short brand story produced a higher level of brand attitude, perceived value,
purchase intentions, and word-of-mouth intentions than the package without a story. Thus,
despite the fact that the story was (a) short and (b) presented together with other information, it
had a positive impact on the response variables. In this sense, Study 2 produced the same pattern
as Study 1. Moreover, the story was (c) perceived to be only mildly interesting and entertaining.
In contrast to what has been suggested in previous research (Busselle and Bilandzic, 2008; Green,
Brock, & Kaufman, 2004; Lundqvist, Liljander, Gummerus, & van Riel, 2013), this means that
these two story characteristics may not be of defining importance in enhancing responses to
stories in a commercial context. This may be ascribed to the packaging context, which might
trigger consumers’ interest in facts about the product, its characteristics, and its origin instead of
in entertaining content. In any event, given a setting that is likely to attenuate the potential for a
story to have an impact on receivers, the story did have an impact. This finding is in line with
previous authors who have stressed the general persuasiveness of stories (Green & Brock, 2000;
McKee, 2003). It should be noted that the studied brand had not communicated with brand stories
before the present study was conducted, and no other brand from the same product category
(detergents) had used stories on the packaging. Study 2 therefore contributes to the branding
literature and brand-building practice by showing that a company-created brand story can be
successfully introduced late in an existing brand’s life. This is, in fact, what many brands do at
the moment. The results of Study 2 thus support such activities.
26
Short Brand Stories on Packaging: An Examination of Consumer Responses
GENERAL DISCUSSION
Summary of Main Results
The main finding of the two studies was that a short story on a FMCG package produced a higher
level of several consumer responses – such as narrative transportation, positive affect, brand
attitude, perceived value, and intentions – as opposed to the absence of a story. These results are
perhaps not surprising, given the generally strong potential of stories to impact receivers.
However, what makes the present results interesting and novel is the fact that they were obtained
with very short stories, which appeared in a context comprising also other product-related
information.
In addition, the stimulus stories were seen by the participants as only mildly interesting and
entertaining (Study 2), and as having a low emotional charge (Study 1), yet the stories did have
an impact. This should be seen in the light of authors who have emphasized the importance of
creating interesting, entertaining and emotionally appealing stories (Guber, 2007; McKee, 2003;
Twitchell, 2004). Some authors have suggested that compelling stories should involve “the
struggle between expectation and reality in all its nastiness” (Woodside, 2010, p. 535), which
may include elements such as disaster or chaos that “throws life out of balance” (Woodside,
2010, p. 535). However, few firms, it may be assumed, would be willing to tell brand stories with
such negatively charged elements. Given that the stories in the present study were able to have an
impact without such elements from the dark side of life indicates that these may not be needed in
a brand-building context. Thus, the present findings indicate that the story format per se may be
more essential than story content in producing positive consumer responses in a marketing
context. This may be encouraging for marketers who are not seasoned storytellers.
27
Short Brand Stories on Packaging: An Examination of Consumer Responses
Moreover, previous studies on story effects in commercial settings have mainly used high-
involvement products as objects. For such products, text-based messages may have a stronger
potential to impact consumer responses, because consumers make decisions for high-involvement
products more carefully in terms of information processing (Hoyer, 1984; Zaichkowsky, 1985)
and they may therefore be more receptive to a story. The present studies comprised low-
involvement products and thus showed that consumers were susceptible to the impact of a story
also in this setting.
Theoretical Implications
The present study offers three main contributions. First, it provides new knowledge regarding
consumer responses to brand stories on packaging. Previous studies in advertising have shown
that consumers respond positively to narratives as opposed to list- or fact-based ads (e.g., Chang,
2009; Escalas, 2004b; Lien & Chen, 2013; Mattila, 2010; Polyorat, Alden, & Kim, 2007), and the
present study extends these findings to packaging. Furthermore, the present study went beyond
past research by not comparing a list-only with a story-only condition. Instead, it examined a
real-world situation in which a story was added to existing information on a package. By law,
packaging has to include information on the content of the product, which is often excluded from
ads. Thus, consumers are typically confronted with more information on the packaging than in an
ad, and this extra information may not be inherently interesting from the consumer’s point of
view. These circumstances could reduce the impact of the story. However, the present study
shows that even in a relatively cluttered message environment alongside mandatory information,
the presence of a story has a positive impact on several consumer responses. The present study
therefore contributes to packaging research by demonstrating that stories of the type that many
companies are currently placing on their packages may enhance consumers’ brand-related
responses.
28
Short Brand Stories on Packaging: An Examination of Consumer Responses
Second, previous studies on brand storytelling have examined relatively long stories. This
study, in contrast, provides evidence explicitly covering the effects of short stories. It is indeed
impressive that a story with as few as 34 words (Study 1) can cause consumers to feel transported
and lead to several subsequent positive responses.
Third, the study contributes to brand management literature by demonstrating that stories
can be effective branding tools for FMCGs. These are often low-involvement products, and such
products have been neglected in past research on brand stories.
Managerial Implications
The results from the present study offer several managerial implications. First, they encourage the
use of short stories on packaging. Given the effects produced by the relatively mundane and
unexciting stories in the present study, the results also imply that firms do not need to engage in
the development of advanced stories in order to benefit from the presence of a story. However,
some caution is required, because many brands (e.g., beer and ice cream brands), are already
using stories on packages. If this increases further, consumers may become accustomed to stories,
and their novelty value may wear off. Therefore, in the near future, the form and content of the
story – rather than the mere presence of a story – may become more important in drawing
attention to the story and the brand. This would in turn seem to call for more sophisticated
storytelling. However, a well-crafted story may make the consumer more mindful of being
subject to storytelling, which could result in the consumer viewing the situation in terms of
persuasion tactics. This could backfire with respect to the intended impact of the story (Gilliam &
Flaherty, 2015).
Second, it should be noted that the present study used photos of packages as the stimulus
material. Such photos are often used in printed ads, meaning that ads represent an additional way
to expose consumers to packaging stories (i.e., in addition to the shelves of the store). To benefit
29
Short Brand Stories on Packaging: An Examination of Consumer Responses
from the story contribution in this case, however, it is of course imperative that the packages are
depicted in such a way that package stories are readable.
Third, the results from Study 1, which indicate that purchase intentions were not enhanced
by the presence of a story, imply that there are limits to the effects a short story can produce. This
suggests that managers interested in storytelling need to consider how to boost the impact of
stories in a packaging context. For example, the impact of messages embedded in stories may be
increased if stories are integrated with other communication activities. Moreover, it may be
advisable to integrate packages with other media as story vehicles, so that the same story can be
told (or allowed to continue) across different modes of communication. This is indeed what is
increasingly happening when the story itself is the main product (e.g., a novel or a movie), as
many stories today are subject to transmedia storytelling (Ryan, 2005).
Finally, managers need to be mindful about the space available for stories on packaging.
This space is already limited, and yet new demands are introduced continually. For example, the
European Union has introduced a new regulation for the font size of nutrition information on
food packaging, which took effect in December 2014. Therefore, an important issue for managers
(and for researchers), as indicated above, is how short a story can be before it ceases to be story.
Limitations and Suggestions for Further Research
A potential limitation of the present study is that the participants were exposed to photos of
packages (from all angles) rather than real packages. This creates some differences from a
situation in which a customer is examining a package on the floor of the store. Further research
should therefore attempt to use 3-D packages and employ field experiments. However, since the
present study has shown that stories on photos of packages do have an impact, and given the
frequent appearance of product packaging in ads, further research may also offer contributions by
examining various ways of depicting packages with stories in ads.
30
Short Brand Stories on Packaging: An Examination of Consumer Responses
Another limitation relates to the scope of the present study, which examined the impact of
short brand stories for two brands from two different low-involvement FMCG product categories.
Further studies should attempt to assess the use of stories for other brands capable of evoking
different levels of involvement.
Moreover, the present study examined stories that mirrored the kind of stories often found
on FMCG product packages in practice. Such stories are typically positively charged and lack a
strong emotional element. Nevertheless, there are many different stories and many different ways
of telling stories. Further studies should therefore examine the impact of other types of stories
than those in the present study. Another factor calling for attention is the origin of the story,
because the present study dealt only with company-originated stories. Previous research shows
that both customer-originated and company-originated storytelling about a brand can have
positive outcomes (Escalas, 2004b; Lundqvist, Liljander, Gummerus, & van Riel, 2013; Solnet &
Kandampully, 2008; West, Huber, & Min, 2004), but to date no studies seem to have assessed the
relative impact of stories with these types of origin.
It should also be observed that the present study examined the impact of a short text-based
story on consumers’ brand responses. Evidence shows, however, that a picture adds to the impact
of the content (Schroeder & Borgerson, 2005). Some scholars also contend that oral storytelling
(Sametz & Maydoney, 2003) and the combination of a motion picture and soundtrack (Escalas,
2004b) are more efficient ways to communicate a story than the written form. Such studies,
however, were conducted before smartphones and tablets became a part of everyday life,
suggesting that there is still much to examine in terms of how a brand story is transferred to a
receiver.
Finally, the present study focused on the effects of a short brand story on consumers’ brand
responses. However, these responses might be influenced by a number of mediating factors, such
31
Short Brand Stories on Packaging: An Examination of Consumer Responses
as the level of empathy evoked by the story, the relevance of the story for the receiver, and the
receiver’s level of motivation to process information about the brand. Future studies may
therefore consider addressing the mediating impact of such factors.
32
Short Brand Stories on Packaging: An Examination of Consumer Responses
REFERENCES
Adaval, R., & Wyer, R. S. (1998). The role of narratives in consumer information processing.
Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(3), 207–245.
Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption
and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665-694.
Barthes, R. (1975). An introduction to the structural analysis of narrative. New Literary History,
6(2), 237-272.
Berg, H., Söderlund, M., & Lindström, A. (2015). Spreading joy: Examining the effects of
smiling models on consumer joy and attitudes. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 32(6),
459 - 469.
Boller, G. W. (1990). The Vicissitudes of Product Experience: 'Songs of Our Consuming Selves'
in Drama Ads. i M. E. Goldberg, G. Gorn, & R. W. Pollay (Red.), NA - Advances in
Consumer Research. 17, ss. 621-626. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
Boller, G. W., & Olson, J. (1991). Experiencing Ad Meaning: Crucial Aspects of
Narrative/Drama Processing. i R. H. Holman, & M. R. Solomon (Red.), NA - Advances in
Consumer Research. 18, ss. 172–175. Solomon, Provo, UT: Association for Consumer
Research.
Brechman, J., & Purvis, S. (2015). Narrative, transportation and advertising. International
Journal of Advertising: The Review of Marketing Communications, 34(2), 1-16.
Brewer, W. F., & Lichtenstein, E. H. (1982). Stories are to entertain: A structural-affect theory of
stories. Journal of Pragmatics, 6(5-6), 473–486.
Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: University Press.
Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H. (2008). Fictionality and perceived realism in experiencing stories:
A model of narrative comprehension and engagement. Communication Theory, 18(2),
255–280.
Chang, C. (2009). Being hooked by editorial content: The implications for processing narrative
advertising. Journal of Advertising, 38(1), 21-33.
Ching, R., Tong, P., Chen, J.-S., & Chen, H.-Y. (2013). Narrative online advertising:
Identification and its effects on attitude toward a product. Internet Research, 23(4), 414 –
438.
33
Short Brand Stories on Packaging: An Examination of Consumer Responses
Chiu, H.-C., Hsieh, Y.-C., & Kuo, Y.-C. (2012). How to align your brand stories with your
products. Journal of Retailing, 88 (2), 262–275.
Das, E., Duiven, R., Arendsen, J., & Vermeulen, I. (2014). Exploring killer ads: A terror
management account of death in advertisements. Psychology & Marketing, 31(10), 828-
842.
Deighton, J., Romer, D., & Mcqueen, J. (1989). Using drama to persuade. Journal Of Consumer
Research, 16(3), 335-343.
Egan, K. (1989). Teaching as storytelling: An alternative approach to teaching and curriculum
in the elementary school. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
Escalas, J. (1998). Advertising narratives: What are they and how do they work? In B. Stern,
Representing consumers: voices, views, and visions (1 ed., pp. 267-289). New York, NY:
Routledge.
Escalas, J. (2004a). Imagine yourself in the product: Mental simulation, narrative transportation,
and persuasion. Journal of Advertising, 33(2), 37–48.
Escalas, J. (2004b). Narrative processing: Building consumer connections to brands. Journal of
Consumer Psychology, 14(1&2), 168-80.
Escalas, J. (2007). Self-referencing and persuasion: Narrative transportation versus analytical
elaboration. Journal Of Consumer Research, 33(4), 421-429.
Escalas, J., & Stern, B. B. (2003). Sympathy and empathy: Emotional responses to advertising
dramas. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(4), 566-578.
Escalas, J., Moore, M. C., & Britton, E. J. (2004). Fishing for feelings: Hooking viewers helps!
Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1), 105-114.
Faircloth, J. B., Capella, L. M., & Alford, B. L. (2001). The effect of brand attitude and brand
image on brand equity. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 9(3), 61-75.
Feldman, J.M. and Lynch, J.G. (1988), “Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement
on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(1), 421-
435.
Fog, K., Budtz, C., Munch, P., & Blanchette, S. (2010). Storytelling: Branding in practice.
Heidelberg: Springer.
Forgas, J. P. (1994). The role of emotion in social judgments: An introductory review and an
affect infusion model (AIM). European Journal of Social Psychology, 24(1), 1-24.
34
Short Brand Stories on Packaging: An Examination of Consumer Responses
Forgas, J. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological
Bulletin, 117(1), 39-66.
Gergen, K. J., & Gergen, M. M. (1988). Narrative and the self as relationship. Advances in
Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 17-56.
Gilliam, D., & Flaherty, K. (2015). Storytelling by the sales force and its effects on buyer-seller
exchange. Industrial Marketing Management, 46, 132-142.
Goodman, J.K., Cryder, C.E. & Cheema, A. (2013). Data collection in a flat world: The strengths
and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26(3),
213-224.
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public
narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721.
Green, M. C., Brock, T. C., & Kaufman, G. F. (2004). Understanding media enjoyment: the role
of transportation into narrative worlds. Communication Theory, 14(4), 311-327.
Guber, P. (2007). The four truths of the storyteller. Harvard Business Review, 85(12), 52-59.
Hoyer, W. D. (1984). An examination of consumer decision making for a common repeat
purchase product. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(3), 822-829.
Jensen, R. (1999). The dream society: How the coming shift from information to imagination will
transform your business. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Lassar, W., Mittal, B., & Sharma, A. (1995). Measuring customer-based brand equity. Journal of
Consumer Marketing, 12(4), 11-19.
Lien, N.-H., & Chen, Y.-L. (2013). Narrative ads: The effect of argument strength and story
format. Journal of Business Research, 66(4), 516–522.
Little, S., & Orth, U. R. (2013). Effects of package visuals and haptics on brand evaluations.
European Journal of Marketing, 47(1-2), 198-217.
Loebnitz, N., Schuitema, G., & Grunert, K. (2015). Who buys oddly shaped food and why?
Impacts of food shape abnormality and organic labeling on purchase intentions.
Psychology & Marketing, 32(4), 408-421.
Lundqvist, A., Liljander, V., Gummerus, J., & van Riel, A. (2013). The impact of storytelling on
the consumer brand experience: The case of a firm-originated story. Journal of Brand
Management, 20 No. 4, pp(4), 283–297.
35
Short Brand Stories on Packaging: An Examination of Consumer Responses
Machleit, K. A., Madden, T. J., & Allen, C. T. (1990). Measuring and modeling brand interest as
an alternative Aad effect with familiar brands. In M. E. Goldberg, G. Gorn, & R. W.
Pollay, Advances in Consumer Research (Vol. 17, pp. 223-230). Provo, UT: Association
for Consumer Research.
Machleit, K. A., Madden, T. J., & Allen, C. T. (1993). The mature brand and brand interest: An
alternative consequence of ad-evoked affect. Journal of Marketing, 57(4), 72-82.
Mandler, J. M. (1978). A code in the node: The use of a story schema in retrieval. Discourse
Processes, 1(1), 14-35.
Mattila, A. S. (2000). The role of narratives in the advertising of experiential services. Journal of
Service Research, 3(1), 35–45.
McGregor, I., & Holmes, J. G. (1999). How storytelling shapes memory and impressions of
relationship events over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(3), 403-
419.
McKee, R. (2003). Storytelling that moves people: a conversation with screenwriting coach,
Robert McKee. Harvard Business Review, 81(6), 51–55.
Megehee, C. M., & Woodside, A. G. (2010). Creating visual narrative art for decoding stories
that consumers and brands tell. Psychology & Marketing, 27(6), 603-622.
Netemeyer, R. G., Krishnan, B., Pullig, C., Wang, G., Yagci, M., Dean, D., . . . Wirth, F. (2004).
Developing and validating measures of facets of customer-based brand equity. Journal of
Business Research, 57(2), 209– 224.
Padgett, D., & Allen, D. (1997). Communicating experiences: A narrative approach to creating
service brand image. Journal of Advertising, 26(4), 49-62.
Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1992). Explaining the evidence: Tests of the story model for juror
decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(2), 189-206.
Peracchio, L. A., & Meyers-Levy, J. (1997). Evaluating persuasion-enhancing techniques from a
resource-matching perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2), 178-191.
Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. (1983). Central and Peripheral Routes to
Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement. Journal of Consumer
Research, 10(2), 135-146.
Phillips, B. J., & McGuarrie, E. F. (2010). Narrative and persuasion in fashion advertising.
Journal of Consumer Research, 37(3), 368-392.
36
Short Brand Stories on Packaging: An Examination of Consumer Responses
Polkinghorne, D. E. (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. Albany, NY: State
University of New York.
Polyorat, K., Alden, D., & Kim, E. (2007). Impact of narrative versus factual print ad copy on
product evaluation: The mediating role of ad message involvement. Psychology &
Marketing, 24(6), 539–554.
Puto, C. P., & Wells, W. D. (1984). Informational and Transformational Advertising: the
Differential Effects of Time. i T. C. Kinnear (Red.), NA - Advances in Consumer
Research (ss. 638-643). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
Raghubir, P., & Greenleaf, E. A. (2006). Ratios in proportion: What should the shape of the
package be? Journal of Marketing, 70(2), 95-107.
Ryan, M.-L. (2005). On the theoretical foundations of transmedial narratology. In J. C. Meister,
Narratology beyond literary criticism (pp. 1-23). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Sametz, R., & Maydoney, A. (2003). Storytelling through design. Design Management Review,
14(4), 18-34.
Sax, B. (2006). Storytelling and the "information overload". On the Horizon, 14(4), 165-170.
Schank, R. C. (1990). Tell me a Story: Narrative and Intelligence. Evanston, IL: Northwestern
University Press.
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1995). Knowledge and memory: The real story. In R. S. Wyer,
Knowledge and memory: The real story (pp. 1-85). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
Schoormans, J. P., & Robben, H. S. (1997). The effect of new package design on product
attention, categorization and evaluation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18(2-3), 271–
287.
Schroeder, J., & Borgerson, J. (2005). An ethics of representation for international marketing
communication. International Marketing Review, 22(5), 578-599.
Sears, D. (1983). The person-positivity bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
44(2), 233-250.
Shankar, A., Elliott, R., & Goulding, C. (2001). Understanding consumption: Contributions from
a narrative perspective. Journal of Marketing Management, 17(3/4), 429-453.
Silayoi, P., & Speece, M. (2007). The importance of packaging attributes: A conjoint analysis
approach. European Journal of Marketing, 41(11/12), 1495-1517.
37
Short Brand Stories on Packaging: An Examination of Consumer Responses
Simms, C. D., & Trott, P. (2014). Barriers to the upgrade cycle in a commodity process industry:
Evidence from the UK packaging industry. R&D Management, 44(2), 152-170.
Solnet, D., & Kandampully, J. (2008). How some service firms have become part of "service
excellence" folklore. An exploratory study. Managing Service Quality, 18(2), 179-193.
Spears, N., & Singh, S. (2004). Measuring attitude toward the brand and purchase intentions.
Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 26(2), 53-66.
Stern, B. B. (1994). Classical and vignette television advertising dramas: Structural models,
formal analysis, and consumer effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), 601-615.
Söderlund, M., & Dahlén, M. (2010). The ‘killer’ ad: An assessment of advertising violence.
European Journal of Marketing, 44(11), 1811–1838.
Söderlund, M., & Sagfossen, S. (2015). The consumer experience and the absorbing story.
Nordic Journal of Business, 64(2), 103-118.
Tangari, A., & Smith, R. (2012). How the temporal framing of energy savings influences
consumer product evaluations and choice 29, 4. Psychology & Marketing, 29(4), 198-208.
Twitchell, J. B. (2004). An English teacher looks at branding. Journal of Consumer Research,
31(2), 484-489.
Underwood, R. L. (1999). Construction of brand identity through packaging: A qualitative
inquiry. In A. Manon, & A. Sharma, Marketing theory and applications (Vol. 10, pp. 147-
148). Chicago, Illinois: American Marketing Association.
Underwood, R. L. (2003). The communicative power of product packaging: Creating brand
identity via lived and mediated experience. Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice,
11(1), 62-76.
Underwood, R. L., & Ozanne, J. L. (1998). Is your package an effective communicator? A
normative framework for increasing the communicative competence of packaging.
Journal of Marketing Communications, 4(4), 207–220.
van Stegeren, A. H., Everaerd, W., Cahill, L., McGaugh, J. L., & Gooren, L. J. (1998). Memory
for emotional events: Differential effects of centrally versus peripherally acting β-
blocking agents. Psychopharmacology, 138(3), 305–310.
Wentzel, D., Tomczak, T., & Herrmann, A. (2010). The moderating effect of manipulative intent
and cognitive resources on the evaluation of narrative ads. Psychology & Marketing,
27(5), 510-530.
38
Short Brand Stories on Packaging: An Examination of Consumer Responses
West, P. M., Huber, J., & Min, K. S. (2004). Altering experienced utility: The impact of story
writing and self-referencing on preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), 623-
630.
Woodside, A. G. (2010). Brand–consumer storytelling theory and research: Introduction to a
psychology & marketing special issue. Psychology & Marketing, 27(6), 531–540.
Woodside, A. G., Sood, S., & Miller, K. E. (2008). When consumers and brand talk: Storytelling
theory and research in psychology & marketing. Psychology & Marketing, 25(2), 97–145.
Yi, Y., & Yoo, J. (2011). The long-term effects of sales promotions on brand attitude across
monetary and non-monetary promotions. Psychology & Marketing, 28(9), 879-896.
Zaichkowski, J. (1985). Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of Consumer Research,
12(3), 341-352.
39
Short Brand Stories on Packaging: An Examination of Consumer Responses
Table 1. Group means for the dependent variables in Study 1 (10-point scale)
Variable Short brand story List p-value t-value Hypothesis
Narrative transportation 5.99 5.31 0.030 -2.184 H1a supportedCritical thoughts 3.18 3.74 0.042 -2.047 H1b supportedPositive affect 6.93 6.21 0.017 -2.399 H2 supportedBrand attitude 7.43 6.67 0.008 -2.693 H3 supportedPerceived value 6.66 5.79 0.020 -2.351 H4 supportedPurchase intentions 6.09 5.56 0.219 -1.232 H5a not supportedWord-of-mouth intentions 4.73 3.84 0.031 -2.169 H5b supported
Table 2. Group means for the dependent variables in Study 2 (7-point scale)
Variable Short brand story No story p-value t-value Hypothesis
Brand attitude 5.47 4.67 0.000 4.477 H3 supportedPerceived value 4.61 4.02 0.019 2.377 H4 supportedPurchase intentions 5.12 4.51 0.015 2.474 H5a supportedWord-of-mouth intentions 2.76 1.94 0.006 2.866 H5b supported
40
Short Brand Stories on Packaging: An Examination of Consumer Responses
Appendix 1: The Short Brand Story
Treatments Study 1
Short brand story condition.
[Muesli brand] was founded in 1999 on our farm. We produce delicious and environmentally
friendly organic products using domestic grain. The excellent quality of our products is important
to our family business now and in the coming years.
Enjoyable organic moments!
[Farmer name], organic farmer and muesli producer
Length in original language: 34 words.
List condition.
[Muesli brand]
- delicious and environmentally friendly products
- family business operating from the farm
- products produced using domestic grain
- founded in 1999
- organic production methods
- excellent quality is important
Length in original language: 33 words.
Treatment Study 2
Short brand story condition.
Domestic freshness for over 50 years
In the 1950s, laundry machines facilitated housework. [Entrepreneur] identified a big problem:
all laundry detergents were foreign made and hence not suitable for local water conditions or
local consumers’ scent preferences. [Entrepreneur] wanted to make a change. He developed a
range of laundry detergents and started to manufacture them in his hometown of [Town] in the
early 1960s. As a result, [Brand] was launched.
[Brand] is still the only domestic laundry detergent manufacturer. All products are designed
and produced locally in [Town], considering our needs, preferences, and the local environment.
[Brand] – fresh and natural, with nothing artificial.
Length in original language: 98 words.
41
Short Brand Stories on Packaging: An Examination of Consumer Responses
Appendix 2: The Measures of the Dependent Variables Variable and α Items measuring the variable Source
Narrative TransportationStudy 1 α = 0.948
While reading the text on the package, I could easily picture the described events taking place.
Adapted from Green & Brock, 2000
I was mentally involved in the content of the text on the package while reading it.
Adapted from Green & Brock, 2000
I could picture myself in the scene described in the text on the package.
Adapted from Green & Brock, 2000
The text on the package affected me emotionally. Adapted from Green & Brock, 2000While reading the text on the package, my attention was focused on the content of the message.
Adapted from Agarwal & Karahanna, 2000
Critical ThoughtsStudy 1 α = 0.932
The muesli is delicious. The muesli is of high quality. The muesli is environmentally friendly. The muesli is locally produced.
Positive AffectStudy 1 α = 0.970
How do you feel now, after seeing this package? Adapted from Berg, Söderlund, & Lindström, 2015
I feel joyful.I am in a good mood.
Brand AttitudeStudy 1 α = 0.950Study 2 α = 0.902
dislike/like Yi & Yoo, 2011bad/good Chang, 2010low quality/high quality Chang, 2010
unpleasant/pleasant Chang, 2010; Das, Duiven, Arendsen, & Vermeulen, 2014
negative/positive Chang, 2010Perceived ValueStudy 1 α = 0.961Study 2 α = 0.933
What I get from [Brand] is worth the cost. Adapted from Netemeyer et al., 2004[Brand] is a good buy.
[Brand] is good value for money.I am willing to pay this price for [Brand].
Purchase IntentionsStudy 1 α = 0.988Study 2 α = 0.920
unlikely/likely Tangari & Smith, 2012; Loebnitz, Schuitema, & Grunert, 2015
improbable/probable Tangari & Smith, 2012impossible/possible Faircloth, Capella, & Alford, 2001
Word-of-mouth Intentions
I intend to talk about [Brand] to others.
All items were measured on a scale from 1 to 10 in Study 1 and on a scale ranging from 1 to 7 in Study 2.The focal brand's name has been replaced with [Brand].
42