· Web viewDATED this day of September, 2006. Foreperson You will take these forms to the jury...
Transcript of · Web viewDATED this day of September, 2006. Foreperson You will take these forms to the jury...
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
KAYLENE THOMAS and ) DENNIS THOMAS, wife and husband, )
)Plaintiffs, )
)vs. )
)WAL-MART STORES INC., )a Delaware Corporation, )
) Defendant. )
8:04CV609
JURY INSTRUCTIONS
Instruction No.8
Members of the jury, the instructions I gave at the beginning of the trial and during
the trial remain in effect. I now give you some additional instructions.
You must, of course, continue to follow the instructions I gave you earlier, as well
as those I give you now. You must not single out some instructions and ignore others,
because all are important. This is true even though some of those I gave you previously
are not repeated here.
The instructions I am about to give you are in writing and will be available to you in
the jury room. Again, all instructions, whenever given and whether in writing or not, must
be followed.
Page 1 of 30
Instruction No.9
Neither in these instructions nor in any ruling, action or remark that I have made
during the course of this trial have I intended to give any opinion or suggestion as to what
your verdict should be.
Page 2 of 30
Instruction No. 10
Page 3 of 30
The evidence from which you are to find the facts consists of the following:
1. The testimony of the witnesses;
2. Documents and other things received as exhibits; and
3. Any facts that have been stipulated-that is, formally agreed to by the parties.
The following things are not evidence:
1. Statements, arguments, and questions of the lawyers for the parties in this case;
2. Objections to questions;
3. Any testimony I told you to disregard; and
4. Anything you may have seen or heard about this case outside the courtroom.
Instruction No. 11
Page 4 of 30
All of the parties to a lawsuit are entitled to the same fair and impartial
consideration, whether they are corporations or individuals.
Page 5 of 30
Instruction No. 5
NEGLIGENCE
I. PLAINTIFFS' CLAIMS
A. Issues
The parties have agreed that the Plaintiffs are residents of Oberlin, Kansas; the
Defendant is a Delaware Corporation having a principal place of business in Bentonville,
Arkansas; and the Defendant owns the retail store in McCook, Nebraska. This case
involves an incident that occurred on April12, 2002 in McCook, Nebraska, when Plaintiff,
Kaylene Thomas fell at Defendant's retail store. Plaintiff was walking in a restroom at the
Defendant's store when she fell and was injured.
The Plaintiff Kaylene Thomas claims that the Defendant was negligent in one or
more of the following ways:
1. Defendant was negligent in creating or permitting a dangerous condition, a wet surface floor, to exist in an area it knew or should have known was used by customers, and in failing to take reasonable steps to prevent the existence of a dangerous condition, thereby causing severe and permanent injuries to Plaintiff, consisting of one or more of the following acts or omissions:
a. In creating a dangerous condition, that is, a wet surface in a highly traveled area, and at a time when the public would be expected to traverse the area, and;
b. In failing to post a warning of the dangerous condition.
The Plaintiff, Kaylene Thomas also claims that she was injured as a result of that
negligence and seeks a judgment against the Defendant for her damages.
Plaintiff Dennis Thomas alleges that he has sustained past and future damages for
loss of the society, companionship, services, and consortium of his wife as a direct and
proximate result of Defendant's acts and failures to act described above that proximately
caused the injuries to Kaylene Thomas.
Page 6 of 30
The Defendant denies it was negligent in any fashion, and in addition, affirmatively
alleges that the Plaintiff was contributorily negligent.
B. Burden of Proof
The parties have agreed that the Plaintiff, Kaylene Thomas was a lawful entrant on
the Defendant's premises on April 12, 2002. Therefore, before the Plaintiff can recover
against the Defendant on her claim of damages, the Plaintiff must prove by the greater
weight of the evidence each and all of the following:
1. That the Defendant either created the condition, knew of the condition, or by the exercise of reasonable care, would have discovered the condition;
2. That the Defendant should have realized that the condition involved an unreasonable risk of harm to lawful entrants, such as the Plaintiff;
3. That the Defendant should have expected that lawful entrants, such as thePlaintiff, either:
a. Would not discover or realize the danger; or
b. Would fail to protect themselves against the danger;
4. That the Defendant failed to use reasonable care to protect lawful entrants against the danger;
5. That the condition was a proximate cause of some damage to the Plaintiff; and
6. The nature and extent of that damage.
Plaintiff Dennis Thomas alleges that he has sustained past and future damages for
loss of the society, companionship, services, and consortium of his wife as a direct and
proximate result of Defendant's acts and failures to act described above that proximately
caused the injuries to Kaylene Thomas.
Page 7 of 30
C. Effect of Findings
If the Plaintiffs have failed to establish any one or more of the foregoing numbered
propositions required by the greater weight of the evidence, your verdict will be for the
Defendant and you will complete Verdict Form No. 1.
On the other hand, if the Plaintiffs have established by the greater weight of the
evidence all of the above-numbered propositions, then you must consider the defenses of
the Defendant.
II. DEFENDANT'S DEFENSES
A. Issues
In defense to the Plaintiffs' claim, the Defendant claims that the Plaintiff, Kaylene
Thomas, was contributorily negligent and that Plaintiffs fall and damages were caused by
conditions, circumstances or persons over which Defendant had no control.
The Plaintiff denies that she was contributorily negligent.
B. Burden of Proof
In connection with the Defendant's claim that the Plaintiff, Kaylene Thomas, was
contributorily negligent, the burden is upon the Defendant to prove by the greater weight
of evidence the following:
1. That the Plaintiff was negligent in one or more of the ways claimed by theDefendant, and
Page 8 of 30
2. That this negligence on the part of the Plaintiff was a proximate cause of her own injury.
C. Effect of Findings
If the Plaintiffs have met their burden of proof and the Defendant has not met its
burden of proof in connection with contributory negligence, then your verdict must be for
the Plaintiffs and, using Instruction No. 26, you must determine the amount of damage
suffered by the Plaintiffs and complete Verdict Form No. 2.
If both the Plaintiffs and the Defendant have met their burdens of proof, then you
must compare their negligence. You will do that by completing Verdict Form No.3, which
I will read to you at the end of these instructions.
Instruction No. 13
Page 9 of 30
Any party who has the burden of proving a claim must do so by the greater weight
of the evidence.
The greater weight of the evidence means evidence sufficient to make a claim more
likely true than not true. It does not necessarily mean a greater number of witnesses or
exhibits.
Any party is entitled to the benefit of any evidence tending to establish a claim, even
though such evidence was introduced by another.
If the evidence upon a claim is evenly balanced, or if it weights in favor of the other
party, then the burden of proof has not been met.
Instruction No. 14
Page 10 of 30
If you find that the Plaintiff was a lawful entrant on the Defendant's premises, then
before the Plaintiff can recover against the Defendant on her claim of slipping and falling
in the restroom at the Defendant's store and being injured, the Plaintiff must prove, by
the greater weight of the evidence, each and all of the following:
1. That the Defendant either created the condition, knew of the condition, or, by the exercise of reasonable care, would have discovered the condition;
2. That the Defendant should have realized that the condition involved an unreasonable risk of harm to such lawful entrants;
3. That the Defendant should have expected that lawful entrants such as thePlaintiff either:
a. would not discover or realize the danger; or
b. would fail to protect themselves against the danger;
4. That the Defendant failed to use reasonable care to protect lawful entrants against the danger;
5. That the condition was a proximate cause of some damage to the Plaintiff; and
6. The nature and extent of the damage.
Instruction No. 15
Page 11 of 30
Negligence is doing something that a reasonably careful person would not do under
similar circumstances, or failing to do something that a reasonably careful person would
do under similar circumstances.
Instruction No. 16
Page 12 of 30
Reasonable care means the care that a reasonable person would exercise under
similar circumstances.
Instruction No. 17
Page 13 of 30
A person may assume that every other person will use reasonable care until the
contrary reasonably appears.
Instruction No. 18
Page 14 of 30
The term "unreasonable risk of harm" means a risk that a reasonable person, under
all the circumstances of this case, would not allow to continue.
Instruction No. 19
Page 15 of 30
A proximate cause is a cause that produces a result in a natural and continuous
sequence, and without which the result would not have occurred.
Instruction No. 20
Page 16 of 30
The words "should have realized" or "should have expected" mean that the
Defendant was required to be reasonably attentive and, where adequate information could
not be obtained by being reasonably attentive, to make reasonable inspections and
investigations. The Defendant was also required to draw reasonably correct conclusions.
Instruction No. 21
Page 17 of 30
There are two kinds of evidence, direct and circumstantial. Direct evidence is either
physical evidence of a fact or testimony by someone who has first-hand knowledge of a
fact by means of his or her senses. Circumstantial evidence is evidence of one or more
facts from which another fact can logically be interred.
The law makes no distinction between these two kinds of evidence. A fact may be
proved by either direct evidence or circumstantial evidence or both.
Instruction No. 22
Page 18 of 30
A witness who has special knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education in a
particular area may testify as an expert in that area. You determine what weight, if any,
to give to an expert's testimony just as you do with the testimony of any other witness. You
should consider the expert's credibility as a witness, the expert's information, and the
reasons given for any opinions expressed by the expert.
Page 19 of 30
Instruction No. 23
You are the sole judge of the credibility of the witnesses and the weight to be given
to their testimony. In determining this, you may consider the following:
1. The conduct and demeanor of the witness while testifying;
2. The sources of information, including the opportunity for seeing and knowing he things about which the witness testified;
3. The ability of the witness to remember and to communicate accurately;
4. The reasonableness or unreasonableness of the testimony of the witness;
5. The interest or lack of interest of the witness in the result of this case;
6. The apparent fairness or bias of the witness;
7. Any previous statement or conduct of the witness that is consistent or inconsistent with the testimony of the witness at this trial; and
8. Any other evidence that affects the credibility of the witness or that tends to support or contradict the testimony of the witness.
Instruction No. 24
Page 20 of 30
During this trial, testimony was given to you by video and written deposition. Such
testimony is under oath and is entitled to the same fair and impartial consideration you give
other testimony.
Instruction No. 25
Page 21 of 30
There is evidence before you from life expectancy tables. This evidence may assist
you in determining probable life expectancy. This is only an estimate based on average
experience. It is not conclusive. You should consider it along with any other evidence
bearing on the probable life expectancy, such as evidence of health, occupation, habits,
and the like.
Instruction No. 26
Page 22 of 30
If you return a verdict for the Plaintiffs, then you must decide how much money
will fairly compensate the Plaintiffs for their injuries.
I am about to give you a list of the things you may consider in making this
decision. From this list, you must only consider those things you decide were proximately
caused by Defendant's negligence:
1. The nature and extent of the injury, including whether the injury is temporary or permanent and whether any resulting disability is partial;
2. The reasonable value of the medical, hospital, nursing, similar care and supplies reasonably needed by and provided in the future;
3. The wages, salary, reasonable value of the working time Plaintiff KayleneThomas has lost because of her diminished ability to work;
4. The reasonable value of the earning capacity Plaintiff Kaylene Thomas is reasonably certain to lose in the future;
5. The physical pain and mental suffering the Plaintiffs have experienced as a result of the injury to Kaylene Thomas, and are reasonably certain to experience in the future; and
6. How much money will fairly compensate Plaintiff Dennis Thomas for his loss of consortium. Consortium means those things to which a person is entitled by reason of the marriage relationship. It includes affection, love, companionship, comfort, assistance, services, moral support, and the enjoyment of sexual and conjugal relations.
Remember, throughout your deliberations you must not engage in any
speculation, guess, or conjecture and you must not award any damages by way of
punishment or through sympathy.
Instruction No. 27
Page 23 of 30
The law forbids you to return a verdict determined by chance. You may not, for
instance, agree in advance that each juror will state an amount to be awarded in damages,
that all of those amounts will be added together, and that the total will be divided by the
number of jurors, and that the result will be returned as the jury's verdict. A verdict
determined by chance is invalid.
Instruction No. 28
Page 24 of 30
There is evidence that the Plaintiff Kaylene Thomas had a back condition prior to
the slip and fall on April 12, 2002. The Defendant is liable only for any damages that you
find to be proximately caused by the slip and fall on April12, 2002. If you cannot separate
damages caused by the preexisting back condition from those caused by the slip and fall
on April 12, 2002, then the Defendant is liable for all of those damages.
The Defendant may be liable for bodily harm to Kaylene Thomas even though the
injury is greater than usual due to the physical condition which predisposed Kaylene
Thomas to the injury. In short, the Defendant takes the Plaintiff as it finds her.
Instruction No. 29
Page 25 of 30
In conducting your deliberations and returning your verdict, there are certain rules
you must follow.
First, when you go to the jury room, you must select one of your members as your
foreperson. That person will preside over your discussions and speak for you here in
court.
Second, it is your duty, as jurors, to discuss this case with one another in the jury
room. You should try to reach agreement if you can do so without violence to individual
judgment, because a verdict must be unanimous.
Each of you must make your own conscientious decision, but only after you have
considered all the evidence, discussed it fully with your fellow jurors, and listened to the
views of your fellow jurors.
Do not be afraid to change your opinions if the discussion persuades you that you
should. But do not come to a decision simply because other jurors think it is right, or
simply to reach a verdict. Remember at all times that you are not partisans. You are
judges- judges of the facts. Your sole interest is to seek the truth from the evidence in the
case.
Third, if you need to communicate with me during your deliberations, you may send
a note to me through the courtroom deputy, signed by one or more jurors. I will respond
as soon as possible either in writing or orally in open court. Remember that you should not
tell anyone-including me-how your votes stand numerically.
Page 26 of 30
Fourth, your verdict must be based solely on the evidence and on the law which I
have given to you in my instructions. The verdict must be unanimous. Nothing I have said
or done is intended to suggest what your verdict should be-that is entirely for you to
decide.
Finally, the verdict form is simply the written notice of the decision that you reach
in this case. The forms read:
VERDICT FORM NO. 1
Page 27 of 30
We, the jury duly impaneled and sworn in the above-entitled cause, do find for the
Defendant.
DATED this day of September, 2006.
Foreperson
VERDICT FORM NO. 2
Page 28 of 30
We, the jury duly impaneled and sworn in the above-entitled cause, do find for the
Plaintiffs and assess the Plaintiffs' damages as follows:
Kaylene Thomas $ _
Dennis Thomas $---------
DATED this day of ________, 20___.
Foreperson
VERDICT FORM NO. 3
Page 29 of 30
We, the jury, find that both the Plaintiffs and the Defendant have met their burdens of proof. We answer the questions on Verdict Form No.3 as follows:
LIST OF PERCENTAGES:
What percent of the negligence was attributedKaylene Thomas? %
What percentage of the negligence was that ofWal-Mart Stores Inc.? ---- %
The total negligence must add up to 100%. TOTAL = 100%
If the negligence of the Plaintiff Kaylene Thomas equals 50% or more, then you must return a verdict for the Defendant: Date and sign a verdict (Verdict Form No. 1) for the Defendant and return it to the Court.
If the negligence of the Plaintiff is less than 50%, then you must return a verdict for the Plaintiff and, using Instruction No. 22, you must determine the amount of damage suffered by the Plaintiff, and enter that figure.
Plaintiff Kaylene Thomas' damages (100%) figured pursuant to Instruction No. 26 are$ _
DATED this day of September, 2006.
Foreperson
Page 30 of 30
You will take these forms to the jury room, and when each of you has agreed on the
verdict, your foreperson will fill in the appropriate forms, sign and date them, and advise
the courtroom deputy that you are ready to return to the courtroom.
If you do not agree on a verdict by 5:00 o'clock p.m., you may separate and return
for deliberation at 9:00 o'clock a.m. on the next business day. You may deliberate after
5:00 o'clock p.m., but if so, please advise the courtroom deputy of your intention to do so.
You may also separate for meals during the course of your deliberations, but if you do
separate for meals please contact the courtroom deputy to advise her of your intention to
separate and when you expect to return to the jury room to reconvene your deliberations.
If you do separate, then during that time, you are not allowed to discuss this case with
anyone, even another juror.
SUBMITTED -p.m.
DATED the ____ of _______, 20___.
VERDICT FORM NO. 1
Page 27 of 30
We, the jury duly impaneled and sworn in the above-entitled cause, do find for the
Defendant.
DATED this day of September, 2006.
Foreperson
VERDICT FORM NO. 2
Page 28 of 30
We, the jury duly impaneled and sworn in the above-entitled cause, do find for the
Plaintiffs and assess the Plaintiffs' damages as follows:
Kaylene Thomas $ _
Dennis Thomas $ _
DATED this day of September, 2006.
Foreperson
VERDICT FORM NO. 3
We, the jury, find that both the Plaintiffs and the Defendant have met their burdens of proof. We answer the questions on Verdict Form No. 3 as follows:
LIST OF PERCENTAGES:
What percent of the negligence was attributedKaylene Thomas? ---- %
What percentage of the negligence was that ofWai-Mart Stores Inc.? ---- %
The total negligence must add up to 100%. TOTAL = 100%
If the negligence of the Plaintiff Kaylene Thomas equals 50% or more, then you must return a verdict for the Defendant: Date and sign a verdict (Verdict Form No. 1) for the Defendant and return it to the Court.
If the negligence of the Plaintiff is less than 50%, then you must return a verdict for the Plaintiff and, using Instruction No. 22, you must determine the amount of damage suffered by the Plaintiff, and enter that figure.
Plaintiff Kaylene Thomas' damages (100%) figured pursuant to Instruction No. 26 are$ _
DATED this day of September, 2006.
Foreperson
Page 29 of 30