FACULTY … (YEAR)Prishtinë

UNIVERSITY OF PRISHTINA“HASAN PRISHTINA”

SELF-ASSESSMENT REPORT

Institution name:Date of submission:

Self-assessment report

0. Table of contents

I. Brief history of the institution

1. Founding (year, verdict number, etc.);2. Location of campuses (address, contact, etc.);3. Other programs provided (accurate labeling of programs and degrees provided) in the

Centre and in every campus;4. Up to date evaluations ( to present every up to date evaluation in institutional level and

study programs in every campus, and duration of accreditation periods);

II. Study Programs (SP)

1. General Information

1.1. Regulations and development/review procedures and approval of new curricula (quality criteria and responsibilities);

1.2. Regulation for students evaluation and their progress during their studies (to briefly present the procedures for students evaluation, exams deadlines, requirements for passing and grading way);

1.3. Regulations and procedures on doing BA, MA, and PhD diploma thesis (for the provided levels)

1.4. The document on legal planned relations between the institution and the students;

2. The study on evaluation program :___________(for each program separately)

2.1 Basic information for the study program (fill every box)

Name of study program

Qualification level according to KKK(with acronyms BA, MA, PhD, Doctorate program, university course, certificate or professional diploma)

Academic grade and name of diploma in full and short form

Field of study according to Erasmus Subject Area Codes (ESAC)

Profile of academic program (specialization)

Minimal duration of the study

Forms of study (regular, part-time while employed, distance learning)

ECTS credits number (total and per year)

Modules/Subjects (titles)

Number of study places

Leader of the field/study program

Permanent scientific/artistic personnel (Number according to personnel categories)

Taxes of study

2.2. The rationale of the program for the labor market (facts and labor market research must be provided);

2.3. International program comparability;

2.4. Target group the program is dedicated to;

2.5. Study program orientation according to leading principles of the institution (mission);

2.6. Study program’s aim and profile (short description of the program/ 7-10 sentences);

2.7. Expected learning results (counting of 7 to 10 competences and qualifications, knowledge and skills);

2.8. The relationship between theoretical and practical/experimental part of the study;

2.9. ECTS credits calculation;

2.10. Practical work – internship (must be proven by valid agreements with business partners);

2.11. Research plan for the program/program in evaluation process;

2.12. Registration and acceptance of students plan;

2.13. Overview of the program (fill every box):

Year I

Semester I Hour/week

Nr. O/E Subject L T ECTS Lecturer

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

Semester II

1

2

3

4

2.14. Each module/subject (maximum an A4 paper) must contain specified:2.14.1. Name;2.14.2. Short content (maximum 5 sentences)2.14.3. Expected learning objectives and results (5 to 7), (knowledge, skills and competences); 2.14.4. Teaching and learning methods;2.14.5. Evaluation methods and passing criteria;2.14.6. Concretization tools/Information Technology – IT (Teknologjia e informacionit – TI);2.14.7. Relationship between the theoretical and practical part of the study2.14.8. Basic literature which is used in a subject (basic title as well as two additional ones, not older than 10 years);

3. Agreements with at least two other accredited universities must be presented in order to ensure that the students can be transferred by similar programs to these accredited universities, in case of bankruptcy or accreditation withdrawal. Accreditation Agency of Kosova - AAK (Agjensia e Kosovës për Akreditim - AKA) has to give its consent for the achieved agreements (The Law on High Education, nr. 04L-037, 2011, article 14, clause 5.8.);

4. Study program/programs of evaluation file must contain syllabuses of each subject/module, each study program of evaluation (in Albanian language, as well as English language), only in electronic form – as an annex out of Self-Assessment Report – SAR (Raporti i vetëvleresimit - RVV).

2.3. Study program :_______________( the following program)

III Personnel

1) The presentation in tabular form of the data for regular academic and artistic personnel (FT) like: name, qualification, academic position, the duration of valid official contracts, teaching assignments, exams, consultations, administrative activities, research etc.

2) The presentation in tabular form of the data for non-regular academic and artistic personnel (PT) like: name, qualification, academic position, the duration of valid official contracts, teaching assignments, exams, consultations, administrative activities, research etc.

3) The presentation in tabular form of the data for visiting academic and artistic personnel (“visiting professors” VP) like: name, qualification, academic position, the duration of valid official contracts/ agreements with their institutions for their engagement, teaching assignments, exams, consultations, administrative activities, research etc.

4) The presentation in tabular form of the data for regular academic and artistic personnel (FT) according to study programs and research fields.

5) The presentation in tabular form of the data for non-regular academic and artistic personnel (PT) according to study programs and research fields.

6) The presentation in tabular form of the data for regular academic and artistic personnel (FT) like: name, qualification, academic position, the duration of valid official contracts, teaching

assignments, exams, consultations, administrative activities, research foreseen as additional staff for the new program(s)/campuses in evaluation.

7) CVs of academic personnel (only in electronic version, a pdf file for each one (CV, name, surname FT/PT/VP ) in a joint folder file with three sub-files (1.FT, 2.PT 3. VP) out of SAR (RVV).

8) The plan for the development of academic staff for a three-year period (There must be evidence for the increase of the number of qualified academic staff, further education support, the financing of new academic staff, mobility, trainings, participation in scientific conferences and symposia etc).

9) The report between regular academic staff and non-regular academic staff in academic units and institutions.

10) The file of Academic Staff (only in printed form), for every member of the academic staff, the valid contract, CV, Diplomas, nostrification (certification of the diploma nostrification from MEST for academic personnel who have any qualification outside of the country), the decision on academic position should be attached.

IV Students

1) The presentation in tabular form of:1.1 The number of current students foreseen in program 1.2 The development of the students’ number in the coming years according to the

program framework1.3 The number of graduates in the last three years per program; gender report

2) The presentation in tabular form of:

2.1 Students passing the exams for the last three years per program

2.2 Students dropping out the studies for the last three years per program

2.3 Graduates’ employment in the last three years

3. The report between regular academic staff (FT) and students in academic units and institutions

4. The distribution of scholarships from the educational institution

5. The organization of students within the academic unit/ institution (the representation of students in managerial and organizational structures)

6. Students service (office hours, tutorials, consultations, mentoring, individual consultation etc.)

7. Students service for career guidance and internship doing

8. Other educational offers of the institution (if any)

9. Services for graduates and employed students (Alumni)

10. The presentation of the number of registered students in the doctorate level and the number of defended doctorates in the last three years (for programs in doctorate level)

V Quality Assurance

1. Description of the system for internal quality assurance;2. Institutional regulations for program quality assurance procedures;3. Procedures for study programs revision;4. Presentation of program/course quality assurance instruments (questionnaires, surveys,

focus groups);5. The following procedures for improvement and the use of previous evaluation results.

VI. Spaces and Appliances

1. Data about premises, lecture halls, laboratories, cabinets, amphitheaters (number and area in square meters), relevant for the program(s) in assessment should be provided in tabular/numerical form;

2. Data about projectors, means of materialization, laboratory equipment etc. relevant for the program(s) in assessment should be provided in tabular/numerical form;

3. Data about physical and electronic register of the relevant books for the program(s) in the evaluation should be submitted.

4. Data about IT infrastructure, internet, WI-FI, number of PCs for academic staff, students and administration data to be provided in tabular/numerical form;

VII. Research and international cooperation

1. The research plan or strategy should be provided in the scope of evaluated programs, as well as current research projects and collaborations;

2. The list with publications of regular (academic) staff and students in the last three years in international and national scientific journals should be provided;

3. The participation of regular (academic) staff at conferences, symposia and scientific seminars in the last three years should be presented in a tabular form;

4. The number of projects for international cooperation in research and teaching (Tempus, Erasmus, etc.) should be provided in a tabular form;

5. The link between research and teaching in the program(s) in assessment (how research results are transmitted through teaching to students) should be provided;

VIII. Funding

1. Budget and financing plan (revenue and expenditure accounts) at unit/institution level in general for at least three years, with data on sources of funding (including own capital);

2. Budget and financing plan (revenue and expenditure accounts) for the program(s) in assessment for at least three years, with data on the sources of funding (including own capital);

3. Research funding plan within the program(s) in assessment for at least three years, with data on the sources of funding (including own capital);

IX. The plan of meeting the recommendations of the expert team (ET) from the last

accreditation procedures

1. The current state of implementation of the recommendations as well as the plan for

implementing the ET recommendations from the final procedure(s) of accreditation at the

institutional level (to respond to each recommendation given by ET separately including

activities for the finalization of recommendations, responsible persons, cost and

timeframe) should be provided;

2. The current state of implementation of the recommendations as well as the plan for

implementing the ET recommendations from the last accreditation procedure(s) for the

program(s) in evaluation (to respond to each recommendation given by ET separately

including the finalization of activities of the recommendations, responsible persons, cost

and timeframe) should be provided;

X. Appendices

Provide a completed sample of:

1. Syllabus;2. Work contract;3. Questionnaires for evaluation;4. Diploma Supplement;5. Form for calculating the student's load / ECTS;6. A CV of the academic staff;7. Other relevant documents clarifying the data in the SAR (RVV);