weather WEEKLY WEATHER AND CROP BULLETIN€¦ · June 4, 2019 Weekly Weather and Crop Bulletin 7 0...

Volume 106, No. 23 http://www.usda.gov/oce/weather June 4, 2019

(Continued on page 5)

Contents

Crop Moisture Maps .............................................................................. 2 May 28 Drought Monitor & U.S. Monthly Drought Outlook ......................................................... 3 Extreme Maximum & Minimum Temperature Maps .............................. 4 Temperature Departure Map ................................................................. 5 Soil Temperature and Pan Evaporation Maps ....................................... 6 Planting Progress Charts for U.S. Corn and Soybeans ................... 7 Growing Degree Day Maps ................................................................... 8 National Weather Data for Selected Cities .......................................... 10 National Agricultural Summary ............................................................ 13 Crop Progress and Condition Tables .................................................. 14 International Weather and Crop Summary & May International Temperature/Precipitation Table ..................... 21 Bulletin Information & June 4 Satellite Image of Tropical Disturbance ............................ 36

WEEKLY WEATHER AND CROP BULLETIN

unoff from earlier rainfall pushed the middle Mississippi River to its second-highest level on

record, behind 1993. Meanwhile, a record-setting crest on the Arkansas River surged through eastern Oklahoma and into western Arkansas, where high-water marks from 1943 and 1945 were eclipsed. At the same time, showers and thunderstorms persisted for much of the week across large sections of the Plains, Midwest, and Northeast, maintaining soggy conditions and perpetuating fieldwork delays. Conditions began to improve in some areas late in

R

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE National Agricultural Statistics Service and World Agricultural Outlook Board

HIGHLIGHTS May 26 – June 1, 2019

Highlights provided by USDA/WAOB

2 Weekly Weather and Crop Bulletin June 4, 2019

June 4, 2019 Weekly Weather and Crop Bulletin 3

June 4, 2019 Weekly Weather and Crop Bulletin 5 (Continued from front cover) the week, although a return to large-scale planting was limited to drier and better-drained soils. In contrast, short-term drought continued to develop and intensify in parts of the Southeast, favoring winter wheat maturation but increasing stress on corn and other spring-sown crops. In the southern Atlantic States, record-setting heat aggravated the effects of dry conditions. Dry weather also prevailed across the northernmost Plains, accompanied by a late-week warming trend. Warmth developed in the Northwest, but chilly weather continued to slow crop development from California to the central and southern Rockies. Many areas of the West experienced scattered to widespread showers—and even some high-elevation snow. Weekly temperatures averaged 5 to 10°F below normal across much of the Southwest, but were at least 10°F above normal in parts of the Southeast and Pacific Northwest. The Mississippi River between Quincy, IL, and Louisiana, MO, crested 12 to 15 feet above flood stage on June 1 or 2. Those levels were previously exceeded only by the high-water marks established in July 1993. North of Quincy, the Mississippi River at Gregory Landing, MO, rose 11.97 feet above flood stage on June 2 to reach the third-highest level on record, behind 13.49 feet on July 9, 1993, and 12.60 feet on June 18, 2008. Meanwhile, the Arkansas River crest coursed through eastern Oklahoma and western Arkansas in late May and early June. Van Buren, AR, experienced a crest 18.79 feet above flood stage on June 1, toppling the April 1945 high-water mark by 2.69 feet. The Arkansas River at Dardanelle, AR, crested 13.91 feet above flood stage on May 30, eclipsing the May 1943 record by 1.81 feet. During the last few days of May, daily-record totals topped 2 inches in locations such as Rochester, MN (3.33 inches on May 27); North Little Rock, AR (2.96 inches on May 29); and Paducah, KY (2.56 inches on May 29). Memorial Day, May 27, was particularly wet in Wyoming, where daily-record totals included 1.65 inches in Cheyenne, 1.63 inches in Riverton, 1.52 inches in Sheridan, and 1.50 inches in Buffalo. The following day on the Plains, record-setting amounts for May 28 reached 1.81 inches in East Rapid City, SD, and 1.29 inches in Sidney, NE. In Colorado, 24-hour snowfall totals on May 27-28 included 2.8 inches in Silverton and 1.9 inches in Ouray. Heavy showers also soaked the Great Lakes region, with daily-record totals occurring in Pittsburgh, PA (1.93 inches on May 29); Lansing, MI (1.92 inches on June 1); and South Bend, IN (1.77 inches on May 27). Even California experienced unusually heavy rain, with Hanford receiving 0.74 inch on May 26 and Palomar Mountain reporting 0.41 inch on May 27. Finally, the period from May 17-29 was exceptionally stormy, with a preliminary U.S. tally of more than 400 tornadoes—at least eight each day—during the 13-day period. One of the week’s most impressive tornadoes, an EF4 with estimated winds near 170 mph—struck Montgomery County, OH, on May 27, tearing a path 19 miles long and up to 0.6 mile wide through Dayton and environs during a 31-minute rampage from 10:41 to 11:12 EDT. Relentless early-season heat persisted in the Southeast, pushing temperatures to 100°F or higher in many locations. Readings soared to 102°F in locations such as Savannah, GA (on May 26), and Gainesville, FL (on May 27), setting monthly records. Previously,

Savannah’s highest May temperature had been 101°F on May 30, 1898, and May 31, 1945. Gainesville had previously attained 101°F on May 31, 1945. Other communities reporting triple-digit, monthly record highs included Augusta, GA; Charleston, SC; and Wilmington, NC—all of which reached 101°F on May 29. Charleston’s previous earliest triple-digit reading had occurred on June 2, 1985. Wilmington had also never before attained a triple-digit reading in May. From May 26-30, Florence, SC, achieved five consecutive triple-digit readings, including a monthly record-tying high of 102°F on the 28th. Florence had also registered highs of 102°F on May 26 and 31, 1953. Not surprisingly, monthly temperature records from May 1953 were broken in locations such as Saint Simons Island, GA (79.9°F); Charleston, SC (78.1°F); and Wilmington, NC (76.3°F). Those values ranged from 5 to 6°F above normal. (Wilmington also completed its third-driest May, with a monthly total of 0.63 inch—just 14 percent of normal.) In contrast, chilly weather in California led to daily-record lows on May 27 in Lancaster (41°F) and Burbank (46°F). Meanwhile, Caribou, ME, posted a daily-record low of 31°F on May 28. After mid-week, warmth spread eastward from the Northwest. By May 30, Grand Forks, ND, collected a daily-record high of 93°F. Mild, showery weather prevailed in much of Alaska. Weekly temperatures averaged at least 5°F above normal at many mainland locations and in parts of southeastern Alaska. On May 26, Ketchikan registered a daily-record high of 77°F. Ketchikan also completed a very dry month, with May rainfall totaling 2.50 inches (30 percent of normal). In contrast, daily-record rainfall totals were noted in locations such as Anchorage (0.76 inch on May 26) and Bethel (0.82 inch on June 1). Farther south, Hawaii’s pattern of unusually warm weather persisted. For example, Kahului, Maui, reported 15 consecutive 90-degree days from May 18 – June 1, with highs peaking at 96°F on the 22nd and 95°F on the 23rd and 28th. With a monthly average temperature of 78.5°F (2.7°F above normal), Kahului also completed its hottest May since 1980. Meanwhile, most leeward areas of Hawaii remained dry, but showers dotted windward locations. On the Big Island, Hilo received 1.93 inches of rain during the last 6 days of May. For May, however, Hilo’s rainfall totaled just 3.85 inches (47 percent of normal).


0.21

0.27

0.22

0.31

0.24

0.69

0.22

0.22

0.34

0.22

0.35

0.30

0.19

0.37

0.27

0.25

0.26

0.24

0.28

0.38

0.30

0.33

0.32

0.18

0.22

0.260.32

0.22

0.11

0.37

0.30

0.44

0.46

0.31

0.20

0.22

0.19

0.27

0.22

0.19

0.260.32

0.25

0.30

0.31

0.28

0.32

0.25

0.13

0.19

0.22

0.23

0.17

0.38

0.23

0.33

0.12

0.44

0.27

0.79

0.33

0.13

0.27

0.29

0.19

0.33

0.16

0.26

0.25

0.25

0.24

0.380.09

0.40

0.20

0.26

0.13

0.51

0.23

0.17

0.28

0.23

0.18

0.160.13

0.24

0.63

0.17

0.260.32

0.01

0.33

0.42

0.28

0.14

0.270.32 0.44

0.34

0.64

0.40

0.190.35

0.26

0.08

0.19

0.20

0.14

0.220.18

0.25

0.28

0.34

0.49

0.340.23

0.290.12

0.23

0.41

0.21

0.30

0.07

0.21

0.11

0.37

Data obtained from the NWS Cooperative Observer Network.

USDA Agricultural Weather Assessments

Based on preliminary data

Average Pan Evaporation (inches/day)May 26 - June 01, 2019


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

10025

-Ma

r

1-A

pr

8-A

pr

15-A

pr

22-A

pr

29-A

pr

6-M

ay

13-M

ay

20-M

ay

27-M

ay

3-Ju

n

10-J

un

17-J

un

Pe

rce

nt

Date

U.S. CORN: Percent Planted

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

Based on NASS crop progress data.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

14-A

pr

21-A

pr

28-A

pr

5-M

ay

12-M

ay

19-M

ay

26-M

ay

2-Ju

n

9-Ju

n

16-J

un

23-J

un

30-J

un

7-Ju

l

14-J

ul

Pe

rce

nt

Date

U.S. SOYBEANS: Percent Planted

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

Based on NASS crop progress data.

2019

Least U.S. Corn Planted by June 2 1995‐2019

1. 2019 67% 2. 1995 77% 3. 1996 86%

Fewest U.S. Soybeans Planted by June 2

1995‐2019

1. 2019 39% 2. 1995 40% 3. 1996 45%

2019


NUMBER OF DAYS

AV

ER

AG

E

MA

XIM

UM

AV

ER

AG

E

MIN

IMU

M

EX

TR

EM

E

HIG

H

EX

TR

EM

E

LOW

AV

ER

AG

E

DE

PA

RT

UR

E

F

RO

M N

OR

MA

L

WE

EK

LY

TO

TA

L, I

N.

DE

PA

RT

UR

E

F

RO

M N

OR

MA

L

GR

EA

TE

ST

IN

24

-HO

UR

, IN

.

TO

TA

L, I

N.,

SIN

CE

JU

N 1

PC

T.

NO

RM

AL

SIN

CE

JU

N 1

TO

TA

L, I

N.,

S

INC

E J

AN

1

PC

T.

NO

RM

AL

SIN

CE

JA

N 1

AV

ER

AG

E

MA

XIM

UM

AV

ER

AG

E

MIN

IMU

M

90 A

ND

AB

OV

E

32 A

ND

BE

LOW

.01

INC

H

O

R M

OR

E

.50

INC

H

O

R M

OR

E

AL BIRMINGHAM 92 69 94 65 81 9 0.00 -1.00 0.00 0.00 0 24.19 95 84 36 7 0 0 0HUNTSVILLE 92 69 96 63 81 10 0.00 -1.16 0.00 0.00 0 34.94 129 87 47 6 0 0 0MOBILE 93 72 96 69 83 7 0.16 -1.18 0.16 0.16 84 21.44 73 93 49 7 0 1 0MONTGOMERY 94 68 97 64 81 6 0.00 -0.87 0.00 0.00 0 20.59 81 92 40 7 0 0 0

AK ANCHORAGE 60 49 66 47 54 4 0.95 0.78 0.87 0.01 33 5.08 153 77 62 0 0 4 1BARROW 34 30 37 27 32 5 0.38 0.36 0.28 0.00 0 2.97 530 94 83 0 7 2 0FAIRBANKS 69 51 75 44 60 7 0.81 0.62 0.63 0.63 2100 3.97 196 67 48 0 0 3 1JUNEAU 66 47 76 40 57 7 0.41 -0.36 0.21 0.21 191 17.99 95 90 63 0 0 3 0KODIAK 52 44 55 36 48 2 3.06 1.66 1.30 0.01 5 28.47 92 90 78 0 0 7 3NOME 55 40 65 34 48 6 0.28 0.11 0.15 0.12 400 7.48 203 94 79 0 0 3 0

AZ FLAGSTAFF 62 31 72 27 47 -7 0.63 0.54 0.43 0.00 0 15.19 161 90 30 0 5 4 0PHOENIX 90 67 99 61 79 -4 0.00 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 3.02 98 32 18 4 0 0 0PRESCOTT 72 44 81 37 58 -3 0.03 -0.04 0.02 0.00 0 8.80 130 67 21 0 0 2 0TUCSON 88 58 96 51 73 -5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5.04 158 32 16 3 0 0 0

AR FORT SMITH 86 66 89 60 76 4 2.71 1.51 2.68 0.00 0 26.64 146 90 55 0 0 2 1LITTLE ROCK 88 67 91 61 78 5 1.31 0.28 1.30 0.00 0 34.67 154 91 43 3 0 2 1

CA BAKERSFIELD 81 58 94 49 70 -3 0.09 0.03 0.09 0.00 0 6.29 140 72 45 2 0 1 0FRESNO 80 58 93 48 69 -2 0.21 0.13 0.21 0.00 0 9.52 125 76 54 1 0 1 0LOS ANGELES 66 56 69 50 61 -3 0.08 0.05 0.08 0.00 0 12.83 137 81 67 0 0 1 0REDDING 85 57 97 49 71 2 0.63 0.28 0.45 0.00 0 31.14 147 81 42 3 0 3 0SACRAMENTO 80 54 91 50 67 -1 0.10 0.01 0.10 0.00 0 19.43 166 90 40 1 0 1 0SAN DIEGO 67 59 70 55 63 -2 0.08 0.05 0.08 0.00 0 8.43 112 78 65 0 0 1 0SAN FRANCISCO 66 52 73 52 59 -1 0.00 -0.06 0.00 0.00 0 18.44 139 84 69 0 0 0 0STOCKTON 83 55 92 51 69 0 0.05 -0.02 0.05 0.00 0 12.48 140 78 48 2 0 1 0

CO ALAMOSA 68 31 76 27 49 -5 0.07 -0.07 0.07 0.00 0 4.69 215 82 26 0 6 1 0CO SPRINGS 70 44 77 39 57 -1 0.07 -0.51 0.02 0.00 0 5.70 99 80 28 0 0 4 0DENVER INTL 68 44 76 40 56 -3 0.42 -0.17 0.33 0.00 0 6.78 130 90 42 0 0 3 0GRAND JUNCTION 75 48 86 42 61 -3 0.15 -0.03 0.08 0.00 0 5.94 150 63 32 0 0 2 0PUEBLO 77 47 83 42 62 -2 0.07 -0.26 0.07 0.00 0 4.44 102 85 41 0 0 1 0

CT BRIDGEPORT 73 58 83 51 65 3 1.86 0.98 0.83 0.00 0 21.90 116 85 62 0 0 4 2HARTFORD 76 54 90 47 65 2 0.71 -0.28 0.43 0.00 0 24.81 130 83 52 1 0 3 0

DC WASHINGTON 89 70 93 67 79 10 0.73 -0.13 0.29 0.00 0 18.06 112 82 44 4 0 3 0DE WILMINGTON 85 64 90 61 75 9 1.09 0.18 0.47 0.01 8 20.09 112 95 51 1 0 5 0FL DAYTONA BEACH 94 71 98 68 83 6 0.11 -0.88 0.11 0.11 73 11.27 72 99 48 6 0 1 0

JACKSONVILLE 98 71 100 69 85 9 0.00 -0.92 0.00 0.00 0 12.56 72 88 34 7 0 0 0KEY WEST 87 79 88 77 83 1 0.02 -0.98 0.02 0.00 0 10.72 95 81 67 0 0 1 0MIAMI 89 78 93 75 83 2 0.00 -1.67 0.00 0.00 0 12.80 82 74 53 2 0 0 0ORLANDO 96 72 97 69 84 5 0.00 -1.17 0.00 0.00 0 11.61 79 89 42 7 0 0 0PENSACOLA 92 75 95 72 84 7 0.15 -1.02 0.13 0.13 76 15.06 61 94 55 7 0 2 0TALLAHASSEE 97 71 100 68 84 7 0.00 -1.36 0.00 0.00 0 12.31 49 94 43 7 0 0 0TAMPA 92 76 94 73 84 4 0.00 -0.86 0.00 0.00 0 15.25 121 82 46 7 0 0 0WEST PALM BEACH 89 77 93 73 83 3 1.32 -0.19 1.32 1.32 600 22.20 116 77 54 2 0 1 1

GA ATHENS 95 67 98 60 81 9 0.00 -0.91 0.00 0.00 0 16.03 75 73 33 7 0 0 0ATLANTA 93 72 95 67 83 10 0.00 -0.83 0.00 0.00 0 21.17 93 67 35 7 0 0 0AUGUSTA 99 65 101 60 82 9 0.00 -0.83 0.00 0.00 0 14.48 75 84 32 7 0 0 0COLUMBUS 95 72 97 67 83 8 0.00 -0.78 0.00 0.00 0 17.56 78 84 35 7 0 0 0MACON 98 68 100 63 83 9 0.00 -0.70 0.00 0.00 0 13.42 65 85 30 7 0 0 0SAVANNAH 99 74 102 70 86 11 0.23 -0.76 0.23 0.00 0 10.67 61 77 37 7 0 1 0

HI HILO 83 70 86 69 77 3 2.05 0.52 1.16 0.14 67 34.64 64 83 72 0 0 6 1HONOLULU 89 74 91 72 82 4 0.01 -0.13 0.01 0.01 50 3.14 35 70 62 2 0 1 0KAHULUI 92 68 95 67 80 4 0.00 -0.07 0.00 0.00 0 9.39 86 73 56 7 0 0 0LIHUE 84 72 85 69 78 2 0.34 -0.22 0.24 0.00 0 8.66 50 85 76 0 0 4 0

ID BOISE 76 53 82 48 65 3 0.46 0.22 0.34 0.00 0 11.08 170 85 54 0 0 3 0LEWISTON 83 56 88 51 69 8 0.04 -0.29 0.03 0.00 0 7.94 130 79 53 0 0 2 0POCATELLO 69 44 75 42 57 1 0.21 -0.10 0.20 0.00 0 8.58 137 89 54 0 0 2 0

IL CHICAGO/O'HARE 76 55 81 52 65 3 2.84 2.07 1.92 0.00 0 20.98 159 86 63 0 0 4 2MOLINE 79 62 83 58 70 4 3.11 2.08 1.93 0.00 0 24.93 175 87 66 0 0 5 2PEORIA 80 62 83 58 71 5 2.13 1.23 1.09 0.00 0 24.32 175 95 62 0 0 5 2ROCKFORD 77 57 82 54 67 4 2.80 1.82 1.45 0.12 80 22.49 174 91 68 0 0 6 2SPRINGFIELD 83 61 87 56 72 5 1.12 0.18 0.46 0.00 0 23.17 164 98 53 0 0 4 0

IN EVANSVILLE 84 65 88 59 74 5 2.49 1.41 1.30 0.05 33 29.81 149 94 71 0 0 4 2FORT WAYNE 80 62 84 60 71 7 1.27 0.40 0.55 0.24 185 18.11 127 93 60 0 0 5 1INDIANAPOLIS 81 64 86 59 73 7 0.31 -0.68 0.25 0.00 0 22.43 137 89 58 0 0 2 0SOUTH BEND 75 52 82 49 64 1 3.38 2.55 1.77 0.04 33 20.58 143 95 70 0 0 6 3

IA BURLINGTON 79 61 81 55 70 3 4.94 3.92 1.90 0.00 0 21.88 157 93 60 0 0 5 4CEDAR RAPIDS 75 57 82 53 66 1 2.74 1.80 1.21 0.00 0 18.14 157 95 61 0 0 3 2DES MOINES 77 57 85 53 67 1 2.44 1.43 1.74 0.02 13 16.67 134 90 72 0 0 5 1DUBUQUE 74 56 81 54 65 2 0.92 -0.04 0.46 0.00 0 17.76 136 88 69 0 0 4 0SIOUX CITY 72 53 86 46 63 -2 2.16 1.28 1.19 0.00 0 14.39 146 91 71 0 0 6 1WATERLOO 77 55 89 54 66 2 0.73 -0.30 0.56 0.00 0 16.06 139 87 65 0 0 2 1

KS CONCORDIA 81 59 87 55 70 3 0.64 -0.36 0.50 0.00 0 15.09 143 84 60 0 0 3 1DODGE CITY 80 56 87 47 68 0 0.91 0.19 0.91 0.00 0 11.82 140 88 47 0 0 1 1GOODLAND 74 49 81 43 61 -2 1.60 0.75 1.55 0.02 17 7.85 110 88 67 0 0 4 1TOPEKA 81 61 89 56 71 3 0.78 -0.42 0.57 0.00 0 19.18 149 90 60 0 0 2 1

Based on 1971-2000 normals *** Not Available

TEMP. ˚F

National Weather Data for Selected CitiesWeather Data for the Week Ending June 1, 2019

Data Provided by Climate Prediction Center

PRECIPSTATES

AND STATIONS

RELATIVE HUMIDITY PERCENT

TEMPERATURE ˚F PRECIPITATION


NUMBER OF DAYS

AV

ER

AG

E

MA

XIM

UM

AV

ER

AG

E

MIN

IMU

M

EX

TR

EM

E

HIG

H

EX

TR

EM

E

LOW

AV

ER

AG

E

DE

PA

RT

UR

E

F

RO

M N

OR

MA

L

WE

EK

LY

TO

TA

L, I

N.

DE

PA

RT

UR

E

F

RO

M N

OR

MA

L

GR

EA

TE

ST

IN

24

-HO

UR

, IN

.

TO

TA

L, I

N.,

SIN

CE

JU

N 1

PC

T.

NO

RM

AL

SIN

CE

JU

N 1

TO

TA

L, I

N.,

S

INC

E J

AN

01

PC

T.

NO

RM

AL

SIN

CE

JA

N01

AV

ER

AG

E

MA

XIM

UM

AV

ER

AG

E

MIN

IMU

M

90 A

ND

AB

OV

E

32 A

ND

BE

LOW

.01

INC

H

O

R M

OR

E

.50

INC

H

O

R M

OR

E

WICHITA 83 61 90 51 72 3 1.00 -0.06 0.63 0.00 0 19.69 172 87 59 1 0 3 1

KY JACKSON 82 63 88 56 72 5 1.37 0.18 0.50 0.00 0 23.23 112 98 60 0 0 4 1LEXINGTON 83 64 89 56 74 7 2.79 1.69 1.21 0.00 0 23.37 119 86 59 0 0 4 3LOUISVILLE 84 69 90 64 76 7 1.72 0.67 1.12 0.00 0 27.38 138 85 56 1 0 3 1PADUCAH 86 66 90 60 76 7 3.13 2.16 2.56 0.00 0 38.53 179 87 54 2 0 3 2

LA BATON ROUGE 91 72 94 69 81 4 0.00 -1.16 0.00 0.00 0 27.65 101 96 48 5 0 0 0LAKE CHARLES 89 72 93 70 81 4 2.86 1.37 2.66 0.00 0 28.48 128 91 60 3 0 3 1NEW ORLEANS 92 75 95 73 84 6 0.00 -1.17 0.00 0.00 0 27.04 102 82 55 7 0 0 0SHREVEPORT 90 71 91 67 80 4 0.24 -0.96 0.24 0.00 0 22.79 100 91 53 4 0 1 0

ME CARIBOU 64 40 70 31 52 -4 0.42 -0.35 0.30 0.00 0 18.52 136 86 44 0 1 3 0PORTLAND 65 48 84 42 57 0 1.18 0.38 0.93 0.00 0 21.46 110 92 58 0 0 3 1

MD BALTIMORE 89 65 94 64 77 11 0.52 -0.37 0.40 0.00 0 18.71 107 82 48 3 0 3 0MA BOSTON 70 54 89 50 62 0 0.68 -0.04 0.30 0.00 0 20.19 112 87 57 0 0 3 0

WORCESTER 69 50 82 42 59 -1 0.31 -0.68 0.28 0.00 0 23.26 117 93 52 0 0 2 0MI ALPENA 64 45 78 37 55 -1 0.62 0.04 0.33 0.00 0 16.22 158 91 54 0 0 2 0

GRAND RAPIDS 72 54 79 50 63 1 1.48 0.74 0.50 0.50 455 20.37 156 93 64 0 0 6 1HOUGHTON LAKE 71 45 81 40 58 1 0.69 0.05 0.38 0.03 33 15.54 157 90 55 0 0 3 0LANSING 71 52 80 49 62 1 2.15 1.48 1.91 1.91 1910 16.52 146 99 79 0 0 5 1MUSKEGON 71 49 77 46 60 0 0.73 0.07 0.58 0.58 644 22.76 188 86 66 0 0 3 1TRAVERSE CITY 70 46 84 44 58 -1 1.33 0.77 1.11 0.03 38 17.38 147 93 51 0 0 4 1

MN DULUTH 70 44 82 38 57 2 0.00 -0.79 0.00 0.00 0 14.39 164 67 44 0 0 0 0INT'L FALLS 67 38 79 30 52 -5 0.04 -0.69 0.04 0.00 0 8.97 138 97 41 0 2 1 0MINNEAPOLIS 75 52 88 45 64 1 1.85 0.98 1.83 0.02 15 17.48 187 87 57 0 0 2 1ROCHESTER 71 53 86 48 62 1 3.40 2.58 3.33 0.00 0 21.25 208 87 64 0 0 3 1ST. CLOUD 74 46 88 40 60 0 0.67 -0.20 0.57 0.03 23 15.12 187 94 38 0 0 3 1

MS JACKSON 91 68 93 64 79 5 0.00 -0.93 0.00 0.00 0 29.33 109 91 46 5 0 0 0MERIDIAN 93 68 95 64 81 6 0.00 -0.94 0.00 0.00 0 32.86 114 87 44 7 0 0 0TUPELO 91 69 94 64 80 8 0.00 -1.32 0.00 0.00 0 38.01 141 84 45 5 0 0 0

MO COLUMBIA 83 64 87 59 73 6 0.45 -0.60 0.35 0.00 0 21.62 132 88 56 0 0 2 0KANSAS CITY 80 60 88 54 70 2 1.80 0.61 1.56 0.00 0 24.56 177 96 63 0 0 4 1SAINT LOUIS 85 67 89 62 76 6 2.93 2.03 1.12 1.12 862 27.55 173 82 56 0 0 4 3SPRINGFIELD 82 63 86 60 73 5 1.18 0.10 0.89 0.03 19 27.38 159 87 67 0 0 3 1

MT BILLINGS 72 50 83 45 61 2 0.38 -0.16 0.34 0.00 0 8.82 130 79 42 0 0 3 0BUTTE 66 41 73 35 54 3 0.66 0.14 0.29 0.00 0 6.25 127 84 36 0 0 4 0CUT BANK 69 42 80 34 56 4 0.48 -0.12 0.47 0.00 0 4.90 111 88 34 0 0 2 0GLASGOW 75 47 87 38 61 2 0.00 -0.46 0.00 0.00 0 4.44 123 67 34 0 0 0 0GREAT FALLS 67 46 80 40 57 2 0.98 0.35 0.47 0.00 0 9.55 153 94 48 0 0 3 0HAVRE 72 42 85 35 57 -1 0.25 -0.21 0.25 0.00 0 4.71 109 91 51 0 0 1 0MISSOULA 72 47 81 42 60 5 0.13 -0.34 0.13 0.00 0 7.82 133 82 53 0 0 1 0

NE GRAND ISLAND 75 55 83 53 65 0 3.22 2.26 1.26 0.00 0 15.84 157 88 65 0 0 4 3LINCOLN 78 56 84 53 67 1 1.98 1.03 1.14 0.00 0 14.24 132 89 57 0 0 4 2NORFOLK 73 52 86 47 63 -1 2.06 1.10 0.98 0.01 7 14.53 146 89 65 0 0 5 2NORTH PLATTE 72 49 82 46 61 -1 2.13 1.36 1.61 0.00 0 12.86 170 92 56 0 0 4 1OMAHA 78 59 84 55 68 2 2.99 1.98 1.69 0.00 0 15.31 136 90 61 0 0 5 2SCOTTSBLUFF 69 46 80 42 58 -3 2.17 1.54 1.18 0.00 0 13.33 194 95 62 0 0 4 2VALENTINE 74 51 86 48 62 1 1.87 1.15 0.86 0.00 0 14.75 206 84 58 0 0 4 1

NV ELY 59 35 63 30 47 -7 0.84 0.57 0.24 0.18 450 11.54 242 94 57 0 2 6 0LAS VEGAS 84 63 92 52 73 -6 0.00 -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 4.60 204 41 25 2 0 0 0RENO 70 48 79 44 59 0 0.27 0.13 0.20 0.00 0 8.52 215 70 46 0 0 3 0WINNEMUCCA 68 43 79 39 55 -3 0.94 0.72 0.28 0.09 300 7.14 168 91 72 0 0 6 0

NH CONCORD 70 47 85 42 58 -2 0.93 0.19 0.83 0.00 0 16.42 110 94 46 0 0 3 1NJ NEWARK 79 61 90 58 70 4 2.07 1.15 0.77 0.00 0 22.97 117 79 55 1 0 4 3NM ALBUQUERQUE 79 53 83 46 66 -3 0.00 -0.14 0.00 0.00 0 3.16 119 44 18 0 0 0 0NY ALBANY 74 53 86 49 64 3 0.29 -0.57 0.26 0.01 8 16.34 110 87 48 0 0 3 0

BINGHAMTON 71 52 79 50 62 3 0.55 -0.25 0.35 0.01 9 18.14 120 90 66 0 0 5 0BUFFALO 67 52 74 50 60 -1 0.43 -0.40 0.23 0.19 158 18.40 122 96 65 0 0 3 0ROCHESTER 71 53 79 50 62 1 0.12 -0.57 0.10 0.01 10 12.57 100 84 65 0 0 3 0SYRACUSE 72 52 80 50 62 1 0.40 -0.34 0.20 0.20 182 18.65 127 90 55 0 0 2 0

NC ASHEVILLE 88 60 91 56 74 9 0.00 -1.08 0.00 0.00 0 27.14 132 81 36 4 0 0 0CHARLOTTE 93 66 95 58 79 7 0.00 -0.85 0.00 0.00 0 22.10 118 80 34 6 0 0 0GREENSBORO 89 66 93 58 78 9 0.63 -0.21 0.63 0.00 0 20.55 114 89 41 5 0 1 1HATTERAS 86 72 90 67 79 9 2.86 1.90 2.85 0.00 0 28.55 129 95 67 1 0 2 1RALEIGH 92 66 96 61 79 9 0.72 -0.14 0.67 0.00 0 21.73 119 86 43 5 0 2 1WILMINGTON 96 73 101 67 85 12 0.34 -0.73 0.34 0.00 0 11.41 57 84 36 6 0 1 0

ND BISMARCK 73 47 88 39 60 0 0.59 0.05 0.41 0.00 0 7.26 130 83 48 0 0 2 0DICKINSON 69 42 80 35 56 -2 0.11 -0.49 0.09 0.00 0 7.82 139 85 40 0 0 2 0FARGO 76 46 91 39 61 0 0.00 -0.72 0.00 0.00 0 9.08 137 82 36 1 0 0 0GRAND FORKS 74 43 93 37 59 -2 0.00 -0.59 0.00 0.00 0 7.91 139 83 35 1 0 0 0JAMESTOWN 72 44 88 37 58 -2 0.16 -0.41 0.16 0.00 0 7.01 124 91 41 0 0 1 0WILLISTON 75 42 87 30 58 0 0.00 -0.47 0.00 0.00 0 4.18 90 76 44 0 1 0 0

OH AKRON-CANTON 79 60 86 55 70 8 1.07 0.21 0.35 0.27 225 18.15 118 87 58 0 0 5 0CINCINNATI 81 65 87 58 73 6 0.98 -0.10 0.56 0.00 0 27.92 153 87 64 0 0 3 1CLEVELAND 78 58 86 52 68 6 2.66 1.85 1.06 0.50 417 18.95 129 93 62 0 0 6 3COLUMBUS 82 64 87 59 73 7 1.06 0.18 0.61 0.00 0 21.29 143 89 59 0 0 4 1DAYTON 81 64 87 60 73 8 1.87 0.92 0.89 0.00 0 24.48 148 87 58 0 0 5 2MANSFIELD 79 59 83 54 69 8 1.36 0.34 0.45 0.45 300 19.49 115 100 55 0 0 5 0


TEMP. ˚F PRECIPSTATES

AND STATIONS


Weather Data for the Week Ending June 1, 2019



NUMBER OF DAYS

AV

ER

AG

E

MA

XIM

UM

AV

ER

AG

E

MIN

IMU

M

EX

TR

EM

E

HIG

H

EX

TR

EM

E

LOW

AV

ER

AG

E

DE

PA

RT

UR

E

F

RO

M N

OR

MA

L

WE

EK

LY

TO

TA

L, I

N.

DE

PA

RT

UR

E

F

RO

M N

OR

MA

L

GR

EA

TE

ST

IN

24

-HO

UR

, IN

.

TO

TA

L, I

N.,

SIN

CE

JU

N 1

PC

T.

NO

RM

AL

SIN

CE

JU

N 1

TO

TA

L, I

N.,

S

INC

E J

AN

01

PC

T.

NO

RM

AL

SIN

CE

JA

N01

AV

ER

AG

E

MA

XIM

UM

AV

ER

AG

E

MIN

IMU

M

90 A

ND

AB

OV

E

32 A

ND

BE

LOW

.01

INC

H

O

R M

OR

E

.50

INC

H

O

R M

OR

E

TOLEDO 80 58 85 52 69 6 2.81 2.04 1.44 1.44 1309 19.24 149 90 57 0 0 5 2YOUNGSTOWN 78 57 83 51 68 7 2.71 1.94 0.94 0.94 855 21.09 147 89 59 0 0 6 3

OK OKLAHOMA CITY 81 61 85 56 71 0 0.58 -0.74 0.28 0.17 89 24.30 169 98 61 0 0 3 0TULSA 84 65 89 59 75 3 2.21 0.80 1.36 0.00 0 25.46 146 88 60 0 0 3 2

OR ASTORIA 62 51 68 45 57 3 0.00 -0.67 0.00 0.00 0 22.04 66 90 77 0 0 0 0BURNS 72 47 79 46 59 6 0.08 -0.14 0.08 0.00 0 10.04 184 83 51 0 0 1 0EUGENE 73 49 81 46 61 4 0.01 -0.51 0.01 0.00 0 22.07 84 89 69 0 0 1 0MEDFORD 80 51 91 44 66 6 0.31 0.07 0.31 0.00 0 13.86 155 84 36 1 0 1 0PENDLETON 79 53 88 42 66 5 0.08 -0.17 0.06 0.00 0 9.28 147 84 57 0 0 2 0PORTLAND 76 55 82 50 66 7 0.00 -0.49 0.00 0.00 0 12.92 72 80 65 0 0 0 0SALEM 75 50 82 47 62 5 0.03 -0.39 0.03 0.00 0 18.57 93 88 67 0 0 1 0

PA ALLENTOWN 83 62 88 58 72 9 1.31 0.30 0.56 0.05 36 26.42 148 83 56 0 0 5 1ERIE 72 55 76 49 63 1 0.55 -0.28 0.31 0.08 62 15.72 106 85 72 0 0 6 0MIDDLETOWN 84 64 88 61 74 9 1.82 0.86 0.71 0.52 371 22.86 137 89 50 0 0 4 2PHILADELPHIA 85 66 90 63 75 8 0.66 -0.15 0.35 0.01 9 20.81 119 84 53 1 0 5 0PITTSBURGH 78 61 84 57 70 7 3.47 2.56 1.69 0.11 85 21.08 139 97 58 0 0 5 3WILKES-BARRE 79 59 82 54 69 6 1.63 0.80 0.53 0.35 292 19.79 138 94 57 0 0 5 1WILLIAMSPORT 79 59 82 53 69 6 2.28 1.39 0.81 0.50 385 21.01 131 92 65 0 0 5 2

RI PROVIDENCE 73 54 88 48 63 1 0.87 0.07 0.42 0.00 0 23.81 118 93 55 0 0 3 0SC CHARLESTON 98 73 101 68 86 11 0.25 -0.82 0.25 0.00 0 8.38 47 84 29 7 0 1 0

COLUMBIA 98 68 101 63 83 9 0.00 -0.88 0.00 0.00 0 12.45 64 66 28 7 0 0 0FLORENCE 98 70 102 65 84 10 0.60 -0.26 0.60 0.00 0 13.34 77 87 26 6 0 1 1GREENVILLE 93 67 96 59 80 10 0.00 -1.05 0.00 0.00 0 21.04 95 70 29 6 0 0 0

SD ABERDEEN 77 49 89 40 63 1 0.01 -0.70 0.01 0.00 0 10.85 157 85 52 0 0 1 0HURON 74 52 85 47 63 1 0.52 -0.20 0.51 0.00 0 14.49 178 90 49 0 0 2 1RAPID CITY 68 46 78 43 57 -2 2.32 1.60 1.50 0.00 0 15.29 226 88 56 0 0 4 2SIOUX FALLS 73 49 85 42 61 -1 2.71 1.90 1.46 0.00 0 18.12 202 91 66 0 0 3 2

TN BRISTOL 87 60 90 55 74 8 0.16 -0.80 0.16 0.00 0 26.41 143 94 42 2 0 1 0CHATTANOOGA 92 68 95 63 80 9 0.10 -0.84 0.10 0.00 0 34.57 138 85 40 5 0 1 0KNOXVILLE 89 67 93 59 78 9 0.61 -0.41 0.61 0.00 0 32.20 143 83 36 5 0 1 1MEMPHIS 89 71 92 65 80 6 0.00 -1.03 0.00 0.00 0 30.70 122 85 49 4 0 0 0NASHVILLE 91 69 94 63 80 10 0.01 -1.13 0.01 0.00 0 29.88 138 78 36 4 0 1 0

TX ABILENE 86 67 92 60 76 0 1.95 1.20 1.39 0.01 9 14.36 177 90 66 1 0 3 2AMARILLO 78 54 86 47 66 -3 2.53 1.83 1.22 1.22 1109 9.01 144 92 45 0 0 4 2AUSTIN 91 74 94 71 83 6 1.69 0.48 1.69 0.00 0 20.04 146 86 57 6 0 1 1BEAUMONT 90 73 93 69 82 4 1.76 0.27 1.26 0.00 0 23.76 105 87 62 3 0 2 2BROWNSVILLE 94 80 96 76 87 6 0.00 -0.60 0.00 0.00 0 5.68 71 94 65 7 0 0 0CORPUS CHRISTI 92 78 94 75 85 5 0.01 -0.88 0.01 0.01 8 9.66 89 87 64 7 0 1 0DEL RIO *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** 0.00 0 5.50 84 *** *** *** *** *** ***EL PASO 92 64 99 57 78 1 0.01 -0.08 0.01 0.01 50 0.71 41 40 12 5 0 1 0FORT WORTH 87 69 91 66 78 2 1.15 0.00 0.87 0.28 175 20.16 127 87 54 2 0 2 1GALVESTON 87 78 88 76 83 4 0.00 -0.92 0.00 0.00 0 17.12 108 86 67 0 0 0 0HOUSTON 92 73 95 70 82 4 0.21 -1.10 0.13 0.00 0 17.20 91 96 61 6 0 2 0LUBBOCK 84 60 92 55 72 -1 0.54 -0.07 0.51 0.51 567 7.41 131 88 53 2 0 3 1MIDLAND 85 65 93 55 75 -1 1.11 0.70 1.01 0.00 0 8.06 196 89 66 3 0 3 1SAN ANGELO 87 67 94 61 77 1 0.12 -0.62 0.12 0.00 0 9.69 125 85 60 3 0 1 0SAN ANTONIO 91 73 93 68 82 4 0.26 -0.93 0.24 0.00 0 10.17 80 88 52 5 0 2 0VICTORIA 91 73 93 71 82 3 0.17 -1.09 0.17 0.00 0 12.96 86 94 59 6 0 1 0WACO 91 70 94 67 81 4 0.73 -0.23 0.42 0.00 0 19.31 134 89 65 5 0 2 0WICHITA FALLS 85 65 90 57 75 0 1.14 0.16 0.80 0.03 21 15.27 131 94 63 1 0 3 1

UT SALT LAKE CITY 71 51 79 47 61 -1 1.21 0.84 0.51 0.00 0 14.21 162 84 41 0 0 5 1VT BURLINGTON 67 49 79 46 58 -2 0.58 -0.16 0.49 0.02 18 16.24 130 87 49 0 0 4 0VA LYNCHBURG 88 62 91 60 75 9 0.35 -0.55 0.32 0.00 0 17.32 95 95 44 4 0 2 0

NORFOLK 90 70 99 65 80 11 2.21 1.38 0.79 0.73 608 19.53 105 83 44 4 0 4 3RICHMOND 90 68 95 63 79 11 2.49 1.61 1.77 0.29 242 20.83 117 85 48 4 0 5 1ROANOKE 88 65 93 60 77 10 0.84 -0.09 0.36 0.04 31 17.85 98 82 43 3 0 4 0WASH/DULLES 87 64 91 61 76 11 0.69 -0.33 0.36 0.00 0 19.89 117 80 47 3 0 2 0

WA OLYMPIA 75 49 80 45 62 7 0.00 -0.45 0.00 0.00 0 15.02 60 92 76 0 0 0 0QUILLAYUTE 62 49 72 42 55 2 0.00 -1.08 0.00 0.00 0 31.81 64 95 86 0 0 0 0SEATTLE-TACOMA 73 53 77 52 63 5 0.00 -0.36 0.00 0.00 0 13.98 80 87 68 0 0 0 0SPOKANE 79 54 85 49 66 9 0.18 -0.17 0.15 0.00 0 7.69 99 76 33 0 0 2 0YAKIMA 84 56 92 50 70 11 0.24 0.11 0.24 0.00 0 5.91 158 66 40 1 0 1 0

WV BECKLEY 80 61 83 57 70 7 0.67 -0.28 0.46 0.00 0 23.24 131 91 56 0 0 3 0CHARLESTON 82 63 87 58 73 8 2.67 1.69 1.14 0.00 0 22.60 125 95 63 0 0 4 3ELKINS 79 59 84 57 69 8 1.85 0.75 1.02 0.00 0 20.69 109 88 59 0 0 5 2HUNTINGTON 82 64 88 56 73 6 0.65 -0.35 0.25 0.00 0 20.07 111 94 63 0 0 4 0

WI EAU CLAIRE 72 49 87 42 61 -1 0.10 -0.82 0.07 0.03 23 14.74 141 96 45 0 0 2 0GREEN BAY 71 51 88 49 61 1 2.10 1.43 1.43 0.23 230 16.16 167 94 55 0 0 4 1LA CROSSE 75 55 90 52 65 1 1.15 0.38 1.13 0.00 0 16.92 153 88 46 1 0 2 1MADISON 72 56 82 52 64 3 0.74 -0.04 0.47 0.47 427 18.18 158 90 64 0 0 2 0MILWAUKEE 72 50 85 48 61 1 1.04 0.37 0.50 0.46 460 18.29 140 84 72 0 0 4 1

WY CASPER 64 39 75 31 51 -5 1.09 0.61 0.65 0.01 17 9.28 153 98 64 0 1 4 1CHEYENNE 62 41 71 37 52 -3 2.93 2.38 1.65 0.00 0 11.59 192 85 52 0 0 4 3LANDER 62 41 70 37 51 -6 1.21 0.77 0.95 0.01 17 12.10 178 88 44 0 0 5 1SHERIDAN 69 41 78 36 55 -1 2.44 1.89 1.47 0.00 0 10.97 166 87 61 0 0 2 2


Weather Data for the Week Ending June 1, 2019

STATES AND

STATIONS

TEMP. ˚F PRECIP




National Agricultural Summary May 27 – June 2, 2019

Weekly National Agricultural Summary provided by USDA/NASS

HIGHLIGHTS Rain fell most heavily in parts of Illinois, Iowa, Missouri, Nebraska, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Texas and Wyoming, with some areas receiving more than 4 inches. Above-normal temperatures were noted across the lower Great Lakes, Mid Atlantic, lower Mississippi Valley,

Southeast, and Ohio Valley. Across the Carolinas, Georgia, Tennessee, and Virginia, temperatures were at least 6°F above normal. Temperatures were more than 8°F below normal in parts of Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming.

Corn: By June 2, producers had planted 67 percent of the nation’s corn acreage, 29 percentage points behind both last year and the 5-year average. Forty-six percent of corn acreage had emerged by June 2, thirty-eight percentage points behind both last year and average. Emergence in 13 of the 18 estimating states was behind average by 20 percentage points or more. Fifty-eight percent of Iowa’s corn acreage had emerged by June 2, thirty-one percentage points behind last year and 33 points behind average. Soybean: Thirty-nine percent of the nation’s soybean acreage was planted by June 2, forty-seven percentage points behind last year and 40 points behind the 5-year average. Twelve of the 18 estimating states were behind the average planting pace by more than 20 percentage points. In Illinois, only 21 percent of the intended soybean acreage was planted by week’s end, 72 percentage points behind last year and 63 points behind average. Nineteen percent of the nation’s soybeans had emerged by June 2, forty-six percentage points behind last year and 37 points behind average. Emergence in 13 of the 18 estimating states was behind average by more than 20 percentage points. Thirteen percent of Illinois’ soybean acreage had emerged by June 2, seventy-one percentage points behind last year and 52 points behind average. Winter Wheat: By June 2, seventy-six percent of the nation’s winter wheat had reached the headed stage, 6 percentage points behind last year and 8 points behind the 5-year average. By week’s end, heading progress was behind average by 30 percentage points or more in Michigan, Nebraska, and South Dakota. On June 2, sixty-four percent of the 2019 winter wheat acreage was reported in good to excellent condition, 3 percentage points above the previous week and 27 points above last year. In Kansas, 57 percent of the winter wheat was rated in good to excellent condition, an increase of 2 percentage points from the previous week. Cotton: Nationwide, 71 percent of the cotton had been planted by June 2, three percentage points behind last year and 1 point behind the 5-year average. In Texas, 64 percent of the 2019 cotton was planted by June 2, three percentage points behind the previous year but 2 points ahead of average. Eight percent of the nation’s cotton had reached the squaring stage by June 2, one percentage point behind last year but 1 point ahead of average. On June 2, forty-six percent of the 2019 cotton acreage was rated in good to excellent condition, 4 percentage points above the same time last year. Sorghum: Thirty-five percent of the nation’s sorghum acreage was planted by June 2, twenty-four percentage points behind the previous year and 18 points behind the 5-year average. Planting progress in Nebraska, Oklahoma, and South Dakota was behind average by 34, 26, and 45 percentage points, respectively. Producers in Texas had planted 85 percent of the intended sorghum acreage by week’s end, 10 percentage points behind last year but identical to the 5-year average. Rice: By June 2, producers had seeded 91 percent of the 2019 rice acreage, 8 percentage points behind last year and 7 points behind the 5-year average. Planting progress in Arkansas and Missouri was behind the average pace by 12 and 13 percentage points, respectively. By June 2,

seventy-six percent of the nation’s rice had emerged, 18 percentage points behind last year and 15 points behind average. Emergence was behind the average pace by 18 percentage points or more in three of the six estimating states. On June 2, sixty-one percent of the nation’s rice was rated in good to excellent condition, 13 percentage points below the same time last year. Small Grains: Nationally, oat producers had seeded 91 percent of this year’s acreage by June 2, six percentage points behind the previous year and 7 points behind the 5-year average. Seventy-seven percent of the nation’s oats had emerged by June 2, twelve percentage points behind the previous year and 16 points behind average. Emergence was behind the average pace in all estimating states, except Texas. Twenty-three percent of the nation’s oats had headed by June 2, seven percentage points behind last year and 10 points behind average. Heading had not yet begun in Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wisconsin. On June 2, sixty-two percent of the nation’s oat acreage was rated in good to excellent condition, 3 percentage points below the same time last year. Ninety-four percent of the nation’s barley was planted by June 2, two percentage points behind last year and 3 points behind the 5-year average. By June 2, seventy-three percent of the barley had emerged, 7 percentage points behind the previous year and 12 points behind average. Emergence in all estimating states was behind the average pace. On June 2, eighty-eight percent of the nation’s barley was rated in good to excellent condition, 9 percentage points above the same time last year. By June 2, ninety-three percent of the spring wheat acreage was seeded, 3 percentage points behind both last year and the 5-year average. South Dakota was the furthest behind compared with the state’s average pace. Sixty-nine percent of the nation’s spring wheat had emerged, 9 percentage points behind the previous year and 15 points behind average. Emergence was behind average by 16 percentage points or more in four of the six estimating states. On June 2, eighty-three percent of the nation’s spring wheat was rated in good to excellent condition, 13 percentage points above the same time last year. Other Crops: Nationally, peanut producers had planted 86 percent of the 2019 peanut acreage by June 2, four percentage points ahead of last year and 1 point ahead of the 5-year average. Producers in Georgia, the largest peanut-producing state, had planted 90 percent of the 2019 intended acreage by week’s end, 12 percentage points ahead of last year and 3 points ahead of average. Of the eight estimating states, Oklahoma was the farthest behind in planting. On June 2, sixty-one percent of the nation’s peanut acreage was rated in good to excellent condition, 2 percentage points above the same time last year. By June 2, ninety-seven percent of the sugarbeet acreage was planted, 3 percentage points behind both last year and the 5-year average. Nineteen percent of the nation’s intended 2019 sunflower acreage was planted by June 2, twenty-seven percentage points behind last year and 25 points behind the 5-year average. Planting progress was behind the average pace in all estimating states and had not yet begun in South Dakota.


Crop Progress and Condition Week Ending June 2, 2019

Weekly U.S. Progress and Condition Data provided by USDA/NASS

Prev Prev Jun 2 5-Yr Prev Prev Jun 2 5-Yr Prev Prev Jun 2 5-Yr

Year Week 2019 Avg Year Week 2019 Avg Year Week 2019 Avg

CO 95 71 78 93 CO 70 25 49 73 CO 44 12 37 32

IL 100 35 45 98 IL 91 20 32 91 KS 34 4 8 26

IN 98 22 31 94 IN 88 10 18 80 NE 77 23 36 70

IA 99 76 80 99 IA 89 42 58 91 OK 49 14 25 51

KS 96 70 79 93 KS 89 49 60 81 SD 67 2 8 53

KY 93 82 87 93 KY 79 65 74 81 TX 95 80 85 85

MI 78 33 42 87 MI 58 7 17 63 6 Sts 59 28 35 53

MN 97 66 76 98 MN 84 21 48 87 These 6 States planted 97%

MO 100 65 69 97 MO 95 51 59 93 of last year's sorghum acreage.

NE 99 81 88 98 NE 90 50 67 88

NC 99 95 97 98 NC 97 89 94 95

ND 94 63 81 93 ND 61 8 27 68 Prev Prev Jun 2 5-Yr

OH 89 22 33 90 OH 77 8 18 73 Year Week 2019 Avg

PA 73 66 74 83 PA 47 42 59 63 ID 100 99 100 99

SD 96 25 44 96 SD 76 2 13 80 MI 100 90 95 100

TN 98 93 95 98 TN 94 81 88 94 MN 100 92 95 100

TX 95 93 96 95 TX 90 81 85 89 ND 100 97 99 99

WI 88 46 58 91 WI 71 11 28 72 4 Sts 100 94 97 100

18 Sts 96 58 67 96 18 Sts 84 32 46 84 These 4 States planted 84%

These 18 States planted 92% These 18 States planted 92% of last year's sugarbeet acreage.

of last year's corn acreage. of last year's corn acreage.

Prev Prev Jun 2 5-Yr

Prev Prev Jun 2 5-Yr Prev Prev Jun 2 5-Yr Year Week 2019 Avg

Year Week 2019 Avg Year Week 2019 Avg CO 17 0 8 14

AR 90 42 54 79 AR 82 30 40 70 KS 33 2 17 19

IL 93 14 21 84 IL 84 8 13 65 ND 63 21 43 61

IN 93 11 17 80 IN 77 3 9 56 SD 35 0 0 33

IA 91 32 41 89 IA 68 8 17 63 4 Sts 46 9 19 44

KS 77 22 26 53 KS 58 12 16 36 These 4 States planted 87%

KY 64 38 49 53 KY 46 17 29 34 of last year's sunflower acreage.

LA 97 82 91 93 LA 94 64 77 88

MI 62 23 31 73 MI 42 5 13 45

MN 91 35 51 90 MN 60 3 16 63

MS 92 65 80 89 MS 85 44 64 82

MO 84 12 18 63 MO 67 7 12 47

NE 94 56 64 87 NE 74 23 39 60

NC 53 52 58 55 NC 44 34 47 40

ND 86 46 70 83 ND 42 4 13 45

OH 79 11 18 76 OH 61 4 9 50

SD 83 6 14 82 SD 50 0 2 51

TN 68 49 64 60 TN 47 28 43 40

WI 77 20 34 78 WI 47 1 9 47

18 Sts 86 29 39 79 18 Sts 65 11 19 56

These 18 States planted 95% These 18 States planted 95%

of last year's soybean acreage. of last year's soybean acreage.

Sorghum Percent Planted

Sugarbeets Percent Planted

Sunflowers Percent Planted

Corn Percent Planted Corn Percent Emerged

Soybeans Percent Planted Soybeans Percent Emerged




Prev Prev Jun 2 5-Yr Prev Prev Jun 2 5-Yr

Year Week 2019 Avg Year Week 2019 Avg VP P F G EX

AL 83 88 92 84 AL 1 NA 3 3 AL 1 10 43 44 2

AZ 100 94 99 98 AZ 11 6 14 18 AZ 0 1 9 84 6

AR 99 81 91 98 AR 9 0 0 6 AR 0 3 17 55 25

CA 100 99 100 95 CA 0 NA 5 5 CA 0 0 100 0 0

GA 71 76 84 80 GA 7 NA 6 4 GA 4 11 34 47 4

KS 75 24 48 49 KS 0 NA 0 0 KS 8 8 53 29 2

LA 99 84 94 96 LA 4 0 0 7 LA 0 5 37 54 4

MS 90 62 77 89 MS 3 NA 1 2 MS 0 5 39 47 9

MO 100 51 78 95 MO 15 NA 0 4 MO 7 7 54 32 0

NC 82 74 83 86 NC 4 0 5 2 NC 2 7 42 49 0

OK 58 24 31 49 OK 0 NA 0 1 OK 0 4 27 69 0

SC 83 90 94 85 SC 0 NA 0 1 SC 2 12 44 42 0

TN 92 75 91 92 TN 4 2 4 4 TN 4 6 24 58 8

TX 67 48 64 62 TX 12 7 11 9 TX 3 12 46 29 10

VA 92 84 93 87 VA 4 0 1 2 VA 0 0 15 85 0

15 Sts 74 57 71 72 15 Sts 9 NA 8 7 15 Sts 3 10 41 38 8

These 15 States planted 99% These 15 States planted 99% Prev Wk NA NA NA NA NA

of last year's cotton acreage. of last year's cotton acreage. Prev Yr 1 15 42 38 4



AR 100 80 87 99 AR 98 66 74 96 AR 1 9 36 41 13

CA 98 90 98 97 CA 72 23 65 68 CA 0 0 15 85 0

LA 100 96 98 100 LA 100 92 94 99 LA 0 4 25 63 8

MS 99 80 91 97 MS 91 60 74 92 MS 1 2 29 53 15

MO 100 76 83 96 MO 94 62 73 91 MO 3 5 52 34 6

TX 100 85 93 96 TX 94 81 85 94 TX 0 2 49 42 7

6 Sts 99 84 91 98 6 Sts 94 63 76 91 6 Sts 1 6 32 52 9

These 6 States planted 100% These 6 States planted 100% Prev Wk 1 5 30 54 10

of last year's rice acreage. of last year's rice acreage. Prev Yr 0 3 23 62 12


Year Week 2019 Avg VP P F G EX

AL 76 84 88 78 AL 1 12 49 37 1

FL 87 86 90 87 FL 3 3 55 38 1

GA 78 83 90 87 GA 2 8 27 60 3

NC 83 66 81 83 NC 0 3 49 48 0

OK 83 36 40 81 OK 0 0 20 75 5

SC 87 92 97 89 SC 0 9 51 40 0

TX 87 62 68 84 TX 0 0 8 92 0

VA 87 76 90 83 VA 0 4 10 85 1

8 Sts 82 79 86 85 8 Sts 1 6 32 59 2

These 8 States planted 96% Prev Wk NA NA NA NA NA

of last year's peanut acreage. Prev Yr 2 4 35 54 5

Rice Percent Planted Rice Percent Emerged Rice Condition byPercent

Cotton Condition byPercent

Peanuts Percent Planted Peanut Condition byPercent

Cotton Percent Planted Cotton Percent Squaring




Prev Prev Jun 2 5-Yr Prev Prev Jun 2 5-Yr Prev Prev Jun 2 5-Yr

Year Week 2019 Avg Year Week 2019 Avg Year Week 2019 Avg

IA 100 97 98 100 IA 98 87 93 99 IA 17 1 6 19

MN 97 81 95 98 MN 86 55 76 91 MN 2 NA 0 4

NE 100 94 96 100 NE 96 78 88 98 NE 36 1 14 33

ND 92 75 89 94 ND 65 28 55 76 ND 0 NA 0 1

OH 99 81 86 99 OH 89 71 77 91 OH 8 NA 1 11

PA 98 94 95 98 PA 80 85 89 91 PA 0 0 3 9

SD 99 69 81 99 SD 95 46 65 95 SD 6 NA 0 10

TX 100 100 100 100 TX 100 100 100 100 TX 100 NA 83 100

WI 93 73 79 96 WI 81 41 56 87 WI 1 NA 0 2

9 Sts 97 85 91 98 9 Sts 89 65 77 93 9 Sts 30 NA 23 33

These 9 States planted 66% These 9 States planted 66% These 9 States planted 66%

of last year's oat acreage. of last year's oat acreage. of last year's oat acreage.


VP P F G EX Year Week 2019 Avg VP P F G EX

IA 1 3 33 51 12 AR 100 100 100 100 AR 5 11 29 45 10

MN 2 4 34 53 7 CA 100 100 100 100 CA 0 0 10 70 20

NE 1 3 35 56 5 CO 74 47 68 79 CO 1 3 16 60 20

ND 0 1 21 72 6 ID 44 10 32 38 ID 0 3 26 57 14

OH 0 3 51 42 4 IL 97 78 87 95 IL 6 16 48 27 3

PA 0 5 19 66 10 IN 86 56 75 88 IN 5 9 33 46 7

SD 1 3 36 55 5 KS 95 84 95 97 KS 3 10 30 47 10

TX 6 8 34 47 5 MI 41 1 5 44 MI 5 17 35 34 9

WI 2 7 26 50 15 MO 99 83 93 98 MO 3 11 44 40 2

9 Sts 2 5 31 55 7 MT 4 0 0 13 MT 1 2 10 48 39

Prev Wk 3 5 34 51 7 NE 67 19 45 75 NE 2 6 25 48 19

Prev Yr 4 4 27 56 9 NC 98 92 96 98 NC 8 13 32 42 5

OH 83 39 65 85 OH 10 24 34 28 4

OK 100 96 99 100 OK 2 7 27 57 7

OR 91 25 66 83 OR 4 14 19 36 27

SD 27 0 6 43 SD 1 5 37 53 4

TX 96 96 98 99 TX 1 5 30 43 21

WA 66 22 53 64 WA 0 2 25 64 9

18 Sts 82 66 76 84 18 Sts 2 7 27 50 14

These 18 States planted 90% Prev Wk 2 7 30 48 13

of last year's winter wheat acreage. Prev Yr 14 21 28 29 8

Percent

Oats Percent Planted Oats Percent Emerged Oats Percent Headed

Oat Condition by Winter Wheat Percent Headed Winter Wheat Condition byPercent






ID 97 96 97 98 ID 94 72 83 93 ID 0 2 14 74 10

MN 96 91 95 95 MN 82 55 78 86 MN 1 1 21 67 10

MT 95 84 92 98 MT 73 52 68 84 MT 0 0 8 78 14

ND 97 83 93 96 ND 79 39 70 79 ND 0 2 9 84 5

WA 99 83 95 98 WA 82 62 70 91 WA 0 0 33 53 14

5 Sts 96 87 94 97 5 Sts 80 54 73 85 5 Sts 0 1 11 78 10

These 5 States planted 78% These 5 States planted 78% Prev Wk NA NA NA NA NA

of last year's barley acreage. of last year's barley acreage. Prev Yr 1 2 18 66 13


Year Week 2019 Avg VP P F G EX VP P F G EX

ID 97 93 95 97 AL 3 14 34 45 4 NH 0 8 34 52 6

MN 96 87 95 96 AZ 2 8 32 56 2 NJ 0 8 12 70 10

MT 94 83 93 96 AR 4 6 27 45 18 NM 6 31 36 19 8

ND 96 82 93 95 CA 0 5 35 55 5 NY 3 7 26 47 17

SD 99 79 86 99 CO 1 2 16 62 19 NC 1 12 42 43 2

WA 100 96 99 100 CT 0 0 50 50 0 ND 2 5 26 60 7

6 Sts 96 84 93 96 DE 1 3 12 72 12 OH 1 15 30 48 6

These 6 States planted 99% FL 3 16 29 41 11 OK 0 2 23 65 10

of last year's spring wheat acreage. GA 5 23 42 28 2 OR 1 6 11 50 32

ID 0 4 9 57 30 PA 0 2 18 44 36

IL 1 4 21 55 19 RI 0 5 20 50 25

Prev Prev Jun 2 5-Yr IN 2 6 32 44 16 SC 4 15 30 51 0

Year Week 2019 Avg IA 1 5 32 47 15 SD 1 3 24 53 19

ID 91 66 76 92 KS 1 3 25 55 16 TN 2 7 34 51 6

MN 84 51 73 89 KY 2 7 19 64 8 TX 1 7 25 50 17

MT 68 40 60 83 LA 0 7 35 53 5 UT 0 0 10 51 39

ND 77 45 69 79 ME 0 11 49 40 0 VT 0 7 70 18 5

SD 95 43 73 94 MD 1 4 37 46 12 VA 0 11 27 46 16

WA 93 77 86 95 MA 0 1 20 56 23 WA 2 10 42 45 1

6 Sts 78 47 69 84 MI 1 4 17 61 17 WV 0 5 28 60 7

These 6 States planted 99% MN 1 6 32 53 8 WI 4 12 29 40 15

of last year's spring wheat acreage. MS 1 8 32 53 6 WY 0 2 29 57 12

MO 0 3 33 57 7 48 Sts 1 6 26 54 13

MT 1 3 28 59 9

NE 1 1 15 70 13 Prev Wk 1 5 27 55 12

VP P F G EX NV 0 5 25 60 10 Prev Yr 6 12 32 42 8

ID 1 2 17 75 5

MN 0 0 14 74 12

MT 0 1 11 79 9

ND 0 1 11 81 7

SD 0 1 46 46 7

WA 0 0 41 50 9

6 Sts 0 1 16 75 8

Prev Wk NA NA NA NA NA

Prev Yr 1 3 26 61 9

Pasture and Range Condition by PercentWeek Ending Jun 2, 2019

Barley Percent Planted Barley Percent Emerged

PercentSpring Wheat Condition by

Barley Condition by

Spring Wheat Percent Planted

Spring Wheat Percent Emerged

Percent

VP - Very Poor; P - Poor; F - Fair; G - Good; EX - ExcellentNA - Not Available; *Revised




7

7

4

4.9

2

7

5.8 6.

4

64.4

3.3

6.8

4.4

3.4

4.6

2.4

2.6

3.4

6.2

3.3

2.2

6.6

6.6

6.6

1.3

3.4

5.7

6.3

3.5

6.8

6.7

3.5

6.3

2.1

2.2 4.

4

2.2

4.6

6.8

5

4.8

5

4.7 5

.6

5.9

5.5

6

3.5

Day

s Su

itabl

e fo

r Fie

ldw

ork

This

pro

duct

was

pre

pare

d by

the

USD

A O

ffice

of t

he C

hief

Eco

nom

ist (

OC

E)

Wor

ld A

gric

ultu

ral O

utlo

ok B

oard

(WAO

B)

Uni

ted

Sta

tes

Dep

artm

ent o

fA

gric

ultu

re

Wee

k E

ndin

gJu

ne 0

2, 2

019

Dat

a ob

tain

ed fr

om U

SD

A N

atio

nal A

gric

ultu

ral

Stat

istic

s S

ervi

ce (N

AS

S) w

eekl

y C

rop

Pro

gres

sre

ports

. Th

ese

repo

rts a

re a

vaila

ble

thro

ugh

http

://w

ww

.nas

s.us

da.g

ov/P

ublic

atio

ns/.

Day

s Su

itabl

e0.

0 - 0

.40.

5 - 1

.41.

5 - 2

.42.

5 - 3

.43.

5 - 4

.44.

5 - 5

.45.

5 - 6

.46.

5 - 7

.0




29[+9]

0[-5]

8[-1]

3[-4]

7[-9]

10[+5]

23[+4]

5[-6]

40[-10] 22

[-3]

0[0]

32[-8]

52[-4]

12[-5]

40[-2]

55[-4]

42[-11]17

[-22]

38[-11]

50[-9]

46[-3]

69[0]

6[-14]

0[-9]

0[-1]

58[-8]

9[-1]

60[-10]

16[-20]

4[-3]

0[0]

62[+4]

13[+5]

7[+2]

7[-21]

39[+18]

56[-3]

60[-9]

5[+4]

31[+18]

41[-9]

84[-7]

24[-2]52[+2]

34[+9]

10[-40]

20[+9]

Topsoil MoistureThis product was prepared by theUSDA Office of the Chief Economist (OCE)World Agricultural Outlook Board (WAOB)

United StatesDepartment ofAgriculture

Data obtained from USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service weekly Crop Progressreports. These reports are available through http://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/.

Top ## - Percent Surplus

[Bottom ##] - Change from Last WeekSurplus

Change from Last Week

33

-4

48 States

Percent SurplusWeek Ending - June 02, 2019

Percent90 - 10080 - 8970 - 7960 - 6950 - 5940 - 4930 - 3920 - 2910 - 19 0 - 9

14[0]

12[+4]

8[0]

65[+10]

53[-3]

11[+5]

3[0]

10[+5]

0[0]

0[0]1

[-7]

0[0]

4[+1]

3[+3]

1[+1]

26[+10]

0[0]

0[0]

0[0]

18[+8]

1[+1]

3[0]

0[0]

0[0]

24[+17]

58[-2]

0[0]

88[+11]

0[0]

17[+17]

1[+1]

76[+29]

9[-6]

22[-4]

32[+20]

39[+18]

95[+9]

57[-7]

46[+33]

5[+4]

0[0]

1[0]

0[0]

12[+9]

9[+9]

0[0]

0[0]

0[0]

Topsoil MoistureThis product was prepared by theUSDA Office of the Chief Economist (OCE)World Agricultural Outlook Board (WAOB)


Percent Short to Very ShortWeek Ending - June 02, 2019


Top ## - Percent Short to Very Short

[Bottom ##] - Change from Last WeekShort to Very Short


11

+3

48 States

Percent90 - 10080 - 8970 - 7960 - 6950 - 5940 - 4930 - 3920 - 2910 - 19 0 - 9




29[+7]

0[-5]

16[0]

3[-2]

1[-1]

7[+3]

20[+5]

6[+2]

40[-10] 20

[+1]

44[-8]18

[-2]

36[-3]

0[0]

23[-5]

47[-1]

9[-3]

29[-1]

50[-1]

1[-9]

1[0]

61[-7]

51[-4]

45[-2]

0[-2]

64[-1]

15[-6]

21[-14]

0[0]

62[+3]

59[+4]

9[+2]

10[+1]

7[-19]

35[+17]

56[-1]

5[-11]

60[-9]

4[+4]

29[+16]

36[-9]

83[-8]

21[-1]48[-7]

39[+7]

25[-65]

45[-3]

Subsoil MoistureThis product was prepared by theUSDA Office of the Chief Economist (OCE)World Agricultural Outlook Board (WAOB)



Top ## - Percent Surplus

[Bottom ##] - Change from Last WeekSurplus


31

-2

48 States

Percent SurplusWeek Ending - June 02, 2019

Percent90 - 10080 - 8970 - 7960 - 6950 - 5940 - 4930 - 3920 - 2910 - 19 0 - 9

9[+1]

60[+5]

20[+2]

64[+4]

11[+5]

10[+5]

1[0]

12[-3]

0[0]

0[0]6

[+2]

20[+4]

2[0]

0[0]

5[-1]

3[+1]5

[-1]

0[0]

0[0]

17[+3]

12[+8]

0[0]

0[-1] 0

[0]

1[0]

8[+4]

56[+6]

4[+1]

0[0]

72[+17]

0[0]

61[+28]

8[-3]

12[-2]

24[+10]

27[+18]

49[-3]

30[+21]

93[+17]

10[+6]

1[0]

0[0]

1[0]

0[0]

6[+6]

0[0]

1[0]

0[0]

Subsoil MoistureThis product was prepared by theUSDA Office of the Chief Economist (OCE)World Agricultural Outlook Board (WAOB)


Percent Short to Very ShortWeek Ending - June 02, 2019


Top ## - Percent Short to Very Short

[Bottom ##] - Change from Last WeekShort to Very Short


10

+2

48 States

Percent90 - 10080 - 8970 - 7960 - 6950 - 5940 - 4930 - 3920 - 2910 - 19 0 - 9


COUNTRY CITY

AVG AVG HI LO DEP DEPMAX MIN MAX MIN AVG NRM TOT NRM

ALGERI ALGER 25 11 31 7 18 0.3 19 -25

BATNA 24 7 32 1 16 -2.1 49 10

ARGENT IGUAZU 24 17 30 11 21 2.3 189 18

FORMOSA 24 18 32 10 21 1.5 308 191

CERES 21 13 28 4 17 1.1 168 128

CORDOBA 20 8 28 1 14 -0.1 25 -1

RIO CUARTO 19 9 26 2 14 0.6 42 12

ROSARIO 20 10 25 1 15 1.2 47 -26

BUENOS AIRES 20 10 25 3 15 1.3 62 -20

SANTA ROSA 18 7 27 -2 13 1.3 65 20

TRES ARROYOS 17 7 23 0 12 1.3 43 -22

AUSTRA DARWIN 32 23 33 19 27 0.1 22 0

BRISBANE 23 14 27 6 19 -0.1 52 -61

PERTH 23 8 30 2 15 -1 12 -80

CEDUNA 20 9 30 3 14 -0.3 9 -17

ADELAIDE 18 11 25 5 15 0.4 57 9

MELBOURNE 18 10 23 4 14 1.1 41 -5

WAGGA 17 7 25 1 12 0.2 41 -15

CANBERRA 16 4 23 -3 10 0.1 20 -23

AUSTRI VIENNA 17 9 24 3 13 -2.3 175 109

INNSBRUCK 16 6 25 -1 11 -2.3 200 113

BAHAMA NASSAU 31 24 34 19 27 1.6 120 29

BARBAD BRIDGETOWN 30 26 31 24 28 0.5 26 -26

BELARU MINSK 19 9 27 -2 14 0.6 69 13

BERMUD ST GEORGES 25 20 29 17 22 0 77 9

BOLIVI LA PAZ 15 -1 17 -6 7 -0.3 21 7

BRAZIL FORTALEZA 31 25 32 24 28 0.5 182 -39

RECIFE 30 24 30 23 27 -0.6 113 -189

CAMPO GRANDE 28 19 32 9 23 0.8 41 -37

FRANCA 26 17 28 10 22 1.9 114 57

RIO DE JANEIRO 28 22 32 19 25 2.3 37 -42

LONDRINA 27 17 32 11 22 3.2 101 -8

SANTA MARIA 22 16 32 8 19 2.2 261 100

TORRES 24 17 28 13 20 -1 271 186

BULGAR SOFIA 20 9 26 2 14 -0.5 36 -24

BURKIN OUAGADOUGOU 38 30 42 26 34 2.2 40 -33

CANADA LETHBRIDGE 16 3 28 -7 10 ***** 59 ******

REGINA 19 1 32 -11 10 ***** 11 ******

WINNIPEG 17 5 30 -2 11 ***** 37 ******

TORONTO 17 7 27 1 12 -1 98 25

MONTREAL 17 7 24 2 12 -1.4 97 19

PRINCE ALBERT 16 1 31 -12 9 -2 31 -16

CALGARY 15 3 27 -4 9 -0.8 46 -15

VANCOUVER 18 10 24 5 14 1.6 30 -38

CANARY LAS PALMAS 24 18 29 16 21 1.1 0 -2

CHILE SANTIAGO 20 5 28 -1 12 1.5 4 -65

CHINA HARBIN 22 10 36 2 16 1.2 90 51

HAMI 27 11 35 5 19 -1.3 10 6

BEIJING 29 15 37 7 22 1.4 59 25

TIENTSIN 30 16 39 8 23 2.8 21 -16

LHASA 21 8 25 3 15 2 31 0

KUNMING 29 16 32 12 22 3.2 23 -74

CHENGCHOW 29 17 39 10 23 2.3 1 -59

YEHCHANG 25 16 31 12 21 -1.2 126 -4

HANKOW 26 17 32 12 21 -1.1 191 30

CHUNGKING 25 19 33 14 22 -1 183 36

CHIHKIANG 24 17 32 12 20 -0.9 217 17

WU HU 27 17 35 12 22 0.6 48 -82

SHANGHAI 26 16 34 9 21 0.3 53 -48

NANCHANG 27 20 31 15 23 0.9 100 -146

TAIPEI 28 23 34 18 25 -0.1 414 171

CANTON 28 23 34 17 25 -0.2 380 115

NANNING 29 22 34 18 25 -0.6 128 -57

COLOMB BOGOTA 20 11 22 5 15 1.2 181 98

COTE D ABIDJAN *** *** 33 28 *** ***** ***** ******

CUBA CAMAGUEY 32 22 34 20 27 1.3 520 264

CYPRUS LARNACA 28 17 35 11 23 1.9 0 -9

CZECHR PRAGUE 16 6 23 -2 11 -1.9 87 15

DENMAR COPENHAGEN 16 7 21 -2 12 0.2 37 1

EGYPT CAIRO 35 21 46 16 28 3 0 ******

Based on Preliminary Reports

International Weather and Crop SummaryTEMPERATURE

( C ) (MM)

PRECIP.

EUROPE: Additional moderate to heavy rain furtherboosted prospects for reproductive to filling winter cropsover eastern Europe.

WESTERN FSU: Warm, showery weather maintainedgood to excellent prospects for reproductive to fillingwinter wheat in Russia.

EASTERN FSU: Favorable conditions in central Russiacontrasted with intensifying short-term dryness inKazakhstan.

MIDDLE EAST: Hot, dry weather accelerated wintergrain maturation and harvesting but hastened earlysummer crop development.

SOUTH ASIA: Pre-monsoon showers in southern andeastern India provided good early-season moisture aheadof widespread crop sowing.

EAST ASIA: Heavy rainfall in northeastern Chinabenefited emerging corn, soybeans, and rice.

SOUTHEAST ASIA: Monsoon showers acrossIndochina and much of the Philippines boosted moisturesupplies for rice and other summer crops.

AUSTRALIA: Welcome showers overspread thesoutheast, but dry weather persisted in the west andnortheast.

ARGENTINA: Drier weather allowed the resumption ofsummer crop harvesting.

BRAZIL: Rain maintained overall favorable conditionsfor immature corn in southern production areas.

MEXICO: Scattered showers likely encouraged plantingof corn and other rain-fed summer crops across thesouthern plateau, but more widespread rain was needed toensure uniform germination.

CANADIAN PRAIRIES: Spring grain and oilseedplanting was nearing completion in some areas, butmoisture was needed for proper germination andestablishment.

SOUTHEASTERN CANADA: Conditions weregenerally favorable for winter wheat, pastures, and newlysown summer crops.

May 26 - June 1, 2019International Weather and Crop Highlights and Summaries

provided by USDA/WAOB

May 2019


COUNTRY CITY COUNTRY CITY

AVG AVG HI LO DEP DEP AVG AVG HI LO DEP DEPMAX MIN MAX MIN AVG NRM TOT NRM MAX MIN MAX MIN AVG NRM TOT NRM

ESTONI TALLINN 15 5 27 -3 10 0.5 58 23 N KORE PYONGYANG 26 13 34 7 19 2.5 20 -58

F GUIA CAYENNE 30 24 32 22 27 1.1 653 62 NEW CA NOUMEA 26 20 30 17 23 0.8 26 -63

FIJI NAUSORI 29 22 31 19 25 1.1 67 -176 NIGER NIAMEY 41 30 45 27 36 1.4 7 -26

FINLAN HELSINKI 15 6 27 -3 11 0.5 69 34 NORWAY OSLO 13 5 23 -2 9 -0.9 72 16

FRANCE PARIS/ORLY 18 9 25 0 14 -0.8 104 47 NZEALA AUCKLAND 19 11 21 6 15 ***** 65 ******

STRASBOURG 19 8 27 2 14 -0.6 75 -6 WELLINGTON 17 12 19 7 14 ***** 65 ******

BOURGES 19 9 26 1 14 0.0 50 -29 P RICO SAN JUAN 31 25 34 23 28 0.7 52 -83

BORDEAUX 20 10 28 2 15 -0.3 52 -30 PAKIST KARACHI 36 27 42 24 31 0.4 50 ******

TOULOUSE 20 10 27 3 15 -0.1 67 -11 PERU LIMA 22 18 25 17 20 0.3 1 0

MARSEILLE 22 12 27 4 17 -0.6 7 -33 PHILIP MANILA 34 27 36 25 30 0.0 152 23

GABON LIBREVILLE 30 *** 33 25 *** ***** 66 -202 PNEWGU PORT MORESBY 30 25 32 23 27 0.7 77 19

GERMAN HAMBURG 16 7 23 -2 11 -1.4 64 13 POLAND WARSAW 18 9 26 1 14 0.2 80 29

BERLIN 18 8 26 1 13 -1.0 16 -36 LODZ 17 7 26 -2 12 -1.2 42 -9

DUSSELDORF 17 7 23 0 12 -2.3 55 -15 KATOWICE 16 8 24 1 12 -1.5 139 61

LEIPZIG 17 7 24 0 12 -1.3 34 -15 PORTUG LISBON 26 15 35 12 21 3.8 10 -36

DRESDEN 16 8 25 1 12 -1.4 52 -9 ROMANI BUCHAREST 23 11 28 5 17 0.1 129 75

STUTTGART 16 7 23 0 12 -1.6 127 44 RUSSIA ST.PETERSBURG 17 8 27 2 12 1.5 88 50

NURNBERG 17 6 24 -3 11 -2.2 70 10 KAZAN 22 11 32 1 16 3.5 70 34

AUGSBURG 16 5 23 -2 10 -2.5 135 51 MOSCOW 22 11 29 1 16 3.6 72 18

GREECE THESSALONIKA 25 14 29 9 19 -0.2 18 -24 YEKATERINBURG 19 8 29 -3 13 2.2 38 -6

LARISSA 26 11 31 5 18 -1.0 22 -17 OMSK 18 6 31 -5 12 0.5 37 3

ATHENS 25 16 29 12 20 -0.3 3 -12 BARNAUL 18 5 28 -6 11 -0.7 13 -30

GUADEL RAIZET 30 24 31 21 27 -0.2 178 58 KHABAROVSK 20 8 29 1 14 1.8 118 59

HONGKO HONG KONG INT 29 25 35 20 27 0.7 249 -51 VLADIVOSTOK 16 9 28 5 12 2.7 166 91

HUNGAR BUDAPEST 19 10 26 2 15 -1.6 204 143 VOLGOGRAD 25 12 33 3 18 2.7 43 10

ICELAN REYKJAVIK 11 5 15 -1 8 1.8 29 -22 ASTRAKHAN 26 15 35 8 21 2.6 29 1

INDIA AMRITSAR 38 22 45 18 30 -0.3 30 10 ORENBURG 25 10 33 -2 18 2.3 23 -7

NEW DELHI 40 24 45 20 32 -0.9 27 4 S AFRI JOHANNESBURG 21 9 25 5 15 2.6 0 -14

AHMEDABAD 42 27 44 25 34 0.4 0 -17 BETHAL *** *** 28 12 *** ***** ***** ******

INDORE 40 25 43 21 33 0.2 0 -20 DURBAN 26 17 30 13 21 1.7 1 -52

CALCUTTA 37 27 40 22 32 1.7 110 -18 CAPE TOWN 22 11 28 7 16 1.5 43 -32

VERAVAL 33 27 34 26 30 1.1 0 ****** S KORE SEOUL 26 14 33 8 20 1.9 39 -71

BOMBAY 34 26 36 25 30 -0.2 1 ****** SAMOA PAGO PAGO 30 26 31 24 28 0.5 369 104

POONA 39 22 41 20 30 0.8 0 -34 SENEGA DAKAR 25 20 36 20 23 0.3 0 -1

BEGAMPET 42 29 43 22 35 2.2 28 -6 SPAIN VALLADOLID 23 8 32 4 16 1.6 4 -47

VISHAKHAPATNAM 34 29 35 23 32 0.9 67 14 MADRID 27 10 34 4 18 2.4 0 -48

MADRAS 39 28 43 27 34 0.8 0 -34 SEVILLE 31 15 37 11 23 2.7 0 -37

MANGALORE 34 26 35 22 30 0.4 55 -133 SWITZE ZURICH 15 7 23 0 11 -1.6 147 33

INDONE SERANG 33 24 35 24 29 0.6 94 -28 GENEVA 18 8 24 0 13 -1.0 41 -32

IRELAN DUBLIN 15 6 21 -1 11 -0.1 36 -18 SYRIA DAMASCUS 34 13 41 6 24 3.1 0 -3

ITALY MILAN 21 11 27 4 16 -1.3 120 23 TAHITI PAPEETE 31 24 32 22 27 0.9 93 -9

VERONA 20 11 25 4 15 -2.2 139 60 TANZAN DAR ES SALAAM 29 23 32 18 26 0.7 386 231

VENICE 18 12 24 8 15 -2.1 204 139 THAILA PHITSANULOK 38 27 40 23 32 1.7 67 -110

GENOA *** *** 24 10 *** ***** ***** ****** BANGKOK 37 28 40 26 33 2.4 96 -124

ROME 19 11 22 4 15 -2.1 114 76 TOGO TABLIGBO 34 24 36 17 29 1.4 247 111

NAPLES 20 12 22 5 16 -1.9 151 95 TRINID PORT OF SPAIN 33 24 34 23 29 1.1 64 -33

JAMAIC KINGSTON 32 25 32 23 28 0.3 38 -22 TUNISI TUNIS 24 14 30 10 19 -0.5 33 11

JAPAN SAPPORO 22 11 34 6 17 4.4 32 -24 TURKEY ISTANBUL 24 16 34 11 20 2.8 54 19

NAGOYA 26 16 34 9 21 2.2 162 5 ANKARA 23 9 32 2 16 2.1 34 -8

TOKYO 25 16 33 8 21 1.7 126 -3 TURKME ASHKHABAD 31 20 38 14 25 2.5 27 0

YOKOHAMA 25 17 31 10 21 1.9 166 26 UKINGD ABERDEEN 13 6 20 0 9 0.0 76 22

KYOTO 27 16 34 7 21 1.8 86 -82 LONDON 18 8 25 3 13 0.4 38 -9

OSAKA 26 17 32 9 22 1.9 90 -51 UKRAIN KIEV 22 13 28 6 17 2.2 84 32

KAZAKH KUSTANAY 23 8 31 -5 15 1.4 17 -11 LVOV 18 9 25 -1 14 0.3 161 80

TSELINOGRAD 21 7 29 -6 14 0.8 12 -24 KIROVOGRAD 23 12 32 6 18 2.6 54 14

KARAGANDA 20 5 27 -5 12 -0.9 9 -27 ODESSA 21 14 27 6 17 1.9 42 8

KENYA NAIROBI *** *** 27 13 *** ***** ***** ****** KHARKOV 23 12 32 5 18 2.2 70 16

LIBYA BENGHAZI *** *** 39 13 *** ***** ***** ****** UZBEKI TASHKENT 29 15 35 8 22 2.1 4 -50

LITHUA KAUNAS 18 8 28 -3 13 0.4 34 -11 YUGOSL BELGRADE 20 12 26 5 16 -1.6 142 73

LUXEMB LUXEMBOURG 17 7 23 0 12 -0.7 62 -13 ZAMBIA LUSAKA 25 15 28 10 20 0.5 0 -2

MALAYS KUALA LUMPUR 34 26 36 24 30 2.2 247 28 ZIMBAB KADOMA *** *** 34 5 *** ***** ***** ******

MALI BAMAKO *** *** 31 *** *** ***** ***** ******

MARSHA MAJURO 30 27 31 25 28 0.9 410 111

MARTIN LAMENTIN 31 25 33 22 28 1.2 93 -18

MEXICO GUADALAJARA 32 15 34 10 24 -0.4 7 -20

TLAXCALA 27 12 29 8 20 0.8 59 -22

ORIZABA 29 19 37 15 24 3.0 123 4

MOROCC CASABLANCA 24 17 32 15 20 2.4 0 -18

MARRAKECH 35 17 42 14 26 5.5 1 -16

MOZAMB MAPUTO 30 17 37 13 24 1.7 0 -30

Based on Preliminary Reports

(MM) (MM)

TEMPERATURE

( C )

TEMPERATURE

( C )

PRECIP. PRECIP.

May 2019


For additional information contact: [email protected]

Widespread rain benefited reproductive to filling winter crops over the eastern half of the continent, while dry, increasingly warm weather prevailed in southwestern Europe. A slow-moving storm system produced moderate to heavy rainfall (10-90 mm) over much of south-central and eastern Europe, boosting moisture supplies for reproductive (north) to filling (south) winter wheat and rapeseed. Widespread albeit mostly light showers (2-12 mm) over the remainder of northern Europe maintained good yield prospects for

reproductive to filling winter crops. Conversely, dry, hot weather (31-37°C, up to 7°C above normal) on the Iberian Peninsula accelerated winter grain maturation but trimmed yield prospects for later-developing wheat and barley. Conditions for winter crops have improved across much of Europe with near- to above-normal rainfall over the past 30 days, though below-normal precipitation has been noted in Portugal, Spain, parts of northern Europe (adjacent the North Sea), and the Baltic States.

EUROPE



Rising temperatures accelerated crop development, though recent rain coupled with additional showers and thunderstorms maintained favorable yield prospects across the region. Temperatures during the week averaged 3 to 6°C above normal, with daytime readings topping 30°C (locally as high as 35°C). The warmth accelerated crop development, though recent wet weather has boosted soil moisture and increased the heat tolerance of reproductive to filling winter wheat. Furthermore, many primary winter wheat areas of western and southern

Russia received widespread, locally heavy showers and thunderstorms (5-50 mm) during the period, helping to offset the increased moisture demands brought on by the warm weather. Rain generally bypassed central Ukraine, though here, too, a wet spring (90-day rainfall at or above 100 percent of normal) has winter wheat progressing through reproduction in good to excellent shape. Similarly, the region’s prospects for vegetative summer crops remained favorable despite the heat due to moist soils and the early heat-tolerant stage of development.

WESTERN FSU



Warm weather overspread the region, with beneficial showers in central Russia contrasting with increasing short-term dryness from northern Kazakhstan eastward. After the recent cool spell, temperatures up to 4°C above normal over western growing areas accelerated spring grain emergence and development. However, cooler conditions lingered in Russia’s Siberia District, where temperatures averaged near normal over the period. Across central Russia, variable albeit widespread showers (2-30 mm, locally more) kept soil moisture in good

supply for wheat and barley emergence and establishment. Conversely, scattered light showers (5 mm or less) from northern Kazakhstan eastward into Russia’s Siberia District did little to improve soil moisture shortages brought on by a very dry May (10-50 percent of normal). However, the dry weather facilitated a rapid planting pace for spring wheat and barley. Farther south, highly variable showers (2-30 mm) in eastern Uzbekistan and environs maintained favorable supplemental moisture for irrigated cotton.

EASTERN FSU



Sunny, hot weather accelerated winter grain drydown and harvesting. Temperatures over the Middle East averaged 1 to 3°C above normal, with readings 5 to 8°C above normal noted from central Turkey southeastward into western and southern Iraq. The extreme heat (32-39°C near the coast, 42-47°C

inland) accelerated winter grain drydown but hastened summer crop development and maintained very high irrigation demands. Showers were spotty and mostly limited to central Turkey (2-15 mm) and northeastern Iran (1-40 mm), providing localized relief from the extreme heat.

MIDDLE EAST



The leading edge of the monsoon circulation was reportedly south of Sri Lanka and forecasted to reach southern India nearly a week later than usual. As such, pre-monsoon showers extended across southern and eastern India as well as into Bangladesh. Rainfall amounts varied between 10 to locally over 50 mm in India, with

Bangladesh receiving 50 to locally more than 200 mm. The moisture encouraged early sowing in India ahead of the onset of the monsoon while benefiting reproductive spring-sown (aus) rice in Bangladesh. The remainder of the region experienced mostly dry conditions and temperatures well in excess of 40°C.

SOUTH ASIA



Heavy, early-week showers in northeastern China produced 25 to locally over 100 mm, boosting soil moisture but causing some field ponding in areas with the highest totals; however, drier weather followed, allowing fields to drain quickly. With the recent rainfall, seasonal totals (beginning May 1) were nearly twice the normal amount across the northeast, ensuring ample soil moisture for emergence and establishment of corn, soybeans, and rice. In southern China, near-daily showers (25-100 mm, locally over 200 mm in far southern locales) maintained adequate to

abundant moisture supplies for reproductive early-crop rice and vegetative summer crops. Rainfall totals for the start of the season thus far have been generally better than last year but slightly below normal in some areas. Farther north, warm, dry conditions on the North China Plain promoted wheat maturation. Elsewhere in the region, dryness continued along the North Korea/South Korea border, with rainfall (10-50 mm) in other parts of the peninsula improving moisture conditions. Meanwhile, showers were generally light (less than 25 mm) across Japan.

EASTERN ASIA



Monsoon showers continued across Indochina and the Philippines, with most areas receiving 25 to 50 mm (locally more). The rainfall boosted moisture supplies and encouraged rice sowing in Thailand and environs, while excessive amounts (over 100 mm) in northern Vietnam were unfavorable for ripening winter-spring rice. In Thailand, the rainy season was off to a slow start, leaving seasonal (beginning May 1) totals below last year and the

long-term average in the north and northeast. In the Philippines, rainfall was concentrated in Luzon and Mindanao, increasing moisture supplies for rice and corn establishment. Eastern Luzon has been particularly wet in May, with totals surpassing 800 mm for the month. Meanwhile, continued wet weather in portions of Malaysia and Indonesia benefited oil palm, but more rain is needed to eradicate lingering spring moisture deficits.

SOUTHEAST ASIA



In drought-plagued southern Queensland and northern New South Wales, isolated showers (generally 1-3 mm) provided a negligible increase in soil moisture for recently planted wheat and other winter crops. Although it is still early in the growing season, the persistent dryness is steadily increasing concerns about winter crop prospects, in large part due to last year’s disastrous harvest. In contrast, widespread showers (5-25 mm, locally more) have buoyed winter crop conditions in South Australia, Victoria, and southern New South Wales. The recent rainfall has promoted wheat, barley, and canola germination and

emergence, but significant follow-up rain will be required to sustain early-season yield prospects as the region continues to recover from long-term drought. Elsewhere in the wheat belt, dry weather in Western Australia further reduced moisture supplies for winter grains and oilseeds. The lack of topsoil moisture has hindered early crop growth and reportedly stalled sowing in many locations. Rain is needed soon to help spur wheat, barley, and canola development and to encourage additional planting. Temperatures averaged near normal in western and southern Australia and up to 2°C above normal in the east.

AUSTRALIA



Drier conditions allowed a resumption of summer crop harvesting, following last week’s locally heavy rain. Nearly all major production areas recorded less than 10 mm, with most locations reporting less than 5 mm. Seasonably mild weather (weekly temperatures averaging within 1°C of normal in most areas) accompanied the dryness, with daytime highs ranging from the upper 10s (degrees C) in central production areas (La Pampa, Buenos Aires, and neighboring

locations in Cordoba, Santa Fe, and Entre Rios) to the middle and upper 20s in the far north. Nighttime lows dropped below freezing in far southern and northwestern agricultural areas but no impacts to agriculture were likely given the lateness of the season. According to the government of Argentina, corn and soybeans were 55 and 88 percent, respectively, as of May 30; wheat planting was advancing but no national-level statistics were provided.

ARGENTINA



Showers maintained generally favorable conditions for immature corn in key southern production areas. Rainfall totaled 25 to 50 mm or more from southern sections of Mato Grosso do Sul and Sao Paulo southward through Rio Grande do Sul, with heaviest rainfall (greater than 100 mm) concentrated over central sections of Parana and Santa Catarina. Nighttime lows dropped below 10°C in the aforementioned locations but temperatures stayed well above freezing. According to the government of Parana, second-crop corn was 5 percent harvested as of May 27, with 90 percent of the remaining crop in

filling to maturing stages of development; meanwhile, wheat was 65 percent planted. In contrast, mostly dry, warm weather (daytime highs reaching the middle and upper 30s degrees C in spots) continued throughout large sections of central and northeastern Brazil; the regions experiencing the seasonably dry conditions included key corn and cotton regions (Mato Grosso and Mato Grosso northeastward through Goias and Tocantins) as well as sugarcane and coffee areas of Sao Paulo and Minas Gerais, where the seasonable dryness was likely welcome for early harvest preparations.

BRAZIL



Intensifying rain likely encouraged some planting of corn and other rain-fed summer crops in sections of southern Mexico. Moderate to heavy showers (10-25 mm, locally exceeding 50 mm) were scattered across the southern Plateau (eastern Jalisco to Puebla), though pockets of dryness persisted, necessitating more widespread rain before planting could become widespread. Rainfall also continued to be unseasonably light (less than 10

mm in most areas) in sugarcane areas in both northern and southern Veracruz, as well as portions of Tabasco, but moderate to heavy rain (25-100 mm) developed over farming areas in Oaxaca, Chiapas, and Campeche. Meanwhile, mostly dry, periodically warm weather (daytime highs reaching the upper 30s degrees C) dominated northern Mexico, fostering rapid development of filling to maturing winter grains.

MEXICO



Mostly dry weather promoted rapid spring crop planting but many locations were short on soil moisture needed for normal development of emerging grains and oilseeds. Most Prairie farming areas recorded rainfall totaling well below 10 mm, with near- to above-normal temperatures (daytime highs reaching the upper 20s and lower 30s degrees C) exacerbating moisture losses due to evaporation. Nighttime

lows continued to dip below freezing, but little impact was likely due to the earliness in the season; the last spring freeze is often recorded in early June. According to the government of Saskatchewan, total crop seeding reached 92 percent as of May 27, compared with 91 percent last year and the 5-year average of 83 percent, though many areas required additional moisture for uniform germination.

CANADIAN PRAIRIES



Mostly dry albeit seasonably mild weather promoted growth of wheat, pastures, and emerging summer crops. Rainfall totaled 5 to 25 mm in most locations, though locally heavier rain was recorded in parts of Ontario. Weekly average temperatures generally averaged with 1°C of normal, within highs reaching the upper 20s

(degrees C) in the warmest parts of southern Ontario. Nighttime lows stayed above freezing in all but the northern-most agricultural areas of Quebec. According to reports emanating from Ontario, corn and soybeans were estimated to be 20 and 15 percent planted, respectively, as of May 29.

SOUTHEASTERN CANADA

The Weekly Weather and Crop Bulletin (ISSN 0043-1974) is jointly prepared by the U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). Publication began in 1872 as the Weekly Weather Chronicle. It is issued under general authority of the Act of January 12, 1895 (44-USC 213), 53rd Congress, 3rd Session. The contents may be redistributed freely with proper credit. Correspondence to the meteorologists should be directed to: Weekly Weather and Crop Bulletin, NOAA/USDA, Joint Agricultural Weather Facility, USDA South Building, Room 4443B, Washington, DC 20250. Internet URL: http://www.usda.gov/oce/weather E-mail address: [email protected] The Weekly Weather and Crop Bulletin and archives are maintained on the following USDA Internet URL: http://www.usda.gov/oce/weather/pubs/Weekly/Wwcb/index.htm

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE World Agricultural Outlook Board Managing Editor.......................... Brad Rippey (202) 720-2397 Production Editor........................ Brian Morris (202) 720-3062 International Editor.................. Mark Brusberg (202) 720-2012 Agricultural Weather Analysts......................... Harlan Shannon

and Eric Luebehusen National Agricultural Statistics Service Agricultural Statistician and State Summaries Editor…..…..……. Jannety Mosley (202) 720-7621

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service/Climate Prediction Center Meteorologists...... David Miskus, Brad Pugh, Adam Allgood,

and Rich Tinker

USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. To file a complaint of discrimination, write: USDA, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, Office of Adjudication, 1400 Independence Ave., SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (866) 632-9992 (Toll-Free Customer Service), (800) 877-8339 (Local or Federal relay), (866) 377-8642 (Relay voice users).

Texas Louisiana

Mexico

Mexico

Gulf of Mexico

GOES East Visible June 4, 2019 11:51 am CDT

On June 4, a broad area of low pressure over the western Gulf of Mexico was helping to con-centrate a large area of showers and thunderstorms. Regardless of further development, the disturbance could contribute to heavy rainfall across northeastern Mexico and the western Gulf Coast region of the United States.

Mississippi

weather WEEKLY WEATHER AND CROP BULLETIN€¦ · June 4, 2019 Weekly Weather and Crop Bulletin 7 0...

Documents

Transcript of weather WEEKLY WEATHER AND CROP BULLETIN€¦ · June 4, 2019 Weekly Weather and Crop Bulletin 7 0...