Wearable Sensor System
-
Upload
ytamar-visbal-perez -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Wearable Sensor System
-
7/27/2019 Wearable Sensor System
1/1
The four
different move-
ment disorders
t h a t
Epochlevel
Mobilitylevel
Abnormalitylevel
Assessment level
A
B
C D
F
Planner
Abnorm. MobilityE
Assess. Abnorm.D
Abnorm.Assess.C
MobilityAbnorm.B
EpochMobilityA
Mobility Epoch.F
E
Hardware developed by research team members to acquire
and store multi-channel signals from hybrid sensors usingwireless technology. Hybridsensors under development in
this project will detect EMG and accelerometer (ACC) sig-nals.
b
x1
xN
b
Hidden Layer Output Layer
q11
-1
1
-1
1
-1y
q2
f(y)
...
Artificial Neural Network
f(q1)
f(q2)
Filter
Filter
Filt
er
Filte
r
Filte
r
Filte
r
Feature
Extraction
Raw
data
b
x1
xN
b
Hidden Layer Output Layer
q11
-1
1
-1
1
-1y
q2
f(y)
...
Artificial Neural Network
f(q1)
f(q2)
Filter
Filter
Filt
er
Filte
r
Filte
r
Filte
r
Feature
Extraction
Raw
data
Blackboard architecture for the PSM application. The blackboard
database shown here contains four data representation levels
(Signal Epoch, Mobility, Movement Abnormality, and Medication
State). Transformations between levels are carried out by a collec-
tion of independent programs that are typically called Knowledge
Sources and are invoked according to algorithmically defined con-
trol plans.
Features from the raw EMG and ACC signals are analyzed using
Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs). More specifically, dynamically
evolving features for each activity are characterized through Time-
Dependent Neural Networks. ANN technology is being used in con-
junction with Rule-Based Systems technology. Iterative Correlation
Analysis is used for correcting initial identifications . These diverse
techniques operate collectively through the Blackboard architecture
in the previous figure.
PI: Carlo J. De Luca, PhD1
Co-PIs: Serge H. Roy, ScD1, S. Hamid Nawab, PhD1,2, Joe Jabre, MD3
Other Key Persons: L. Gilmore, ABEE1, Samuel Chang, MS1,2, Peter Novak, MD3, Cathi Thomas, RN, MS3
1 NeuroMuscular Research Center, Boston University2 Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, Boston University
3 Department of Neurology, Boston Medical Center
Wearable-Sensor System for Monitoring Motor FunctionNIH/NIBIB EB007163
BOSTON
UNIVERSITY
SCHOOL of
Medicine
Special thanks to the patients and staff of the Boston University Parkinsons Disease Center
A schematic of the proposed Personal Status Monitor (PSM) for identifying movement disorders, medication states, and mobility in pa-
tients with Parkinsons disease by the automatic analysis and interpretation of electromyographic (EMG) and accelerometer (ACC)
signals recorded from the surface of the body. In this example, the PSM devi ce is monitoring the subject while walking. The proposed
system will provide a continuous history and statistical summarization that can be made available to the clinician to help manage
Wearable Wireless EMG System
Wearable Wireless EMG System
Wearable Wire less EMG System
Problem: Uncontrollable movement activity is a major problem in long-term management of approximately 50% of patientswith Parkinsons disease. Physicians rely on patient diaries to monitor these complications. Diaries need to be recorded
every 15 min, are often inaccurate, have poor time resolution, and are difficult for patients to manage.
Algorithm Development
Data Collection Protocol: patients are monitored using the Personal Status Monitor (PSM) and are videotaped duringthis approximately 4-hour period that is timed to coincide with a complete medication cycle (from On to wearing Off). Ac-
tivities are conducted in a laboratory configured like an apartment. The activities include standardized motor tests used
for clinical assessment (e.g. motor scales from UPDRS), scripted functionl tasks (e.g. sit-stand-and-walk) and free-roaming activity.
The PSM will automatically identify the
onset and duration of the patients On,
Off, and On-with-Dyskinesia medica-
tion phases.
Medication States
The PSM will automatically identify these
four different movement disorders associ-
ated with Parkinsons disease and their se-
verity.
Tremor: Oscillatory,rhythmic movement
Bradykinesia: Slow movement
Akinesia: Inability to initiate a movement
Dyskinesia: Spasmodic movement
Movement Disorders
The PSM will automatically iden-
tify transitions between these
four mobility states.
Mobility StatesProposed Solution
Sitting
Standing
Walking
Lying Down
OFF OFF
ON
Levodopa
IntakeOnset
Dyskinesia
End-of-Dose
Dyskinesia
Peak-Dose
Dyskinesia
Off-Period
Bradykinesia
Off-Period
WEARING-OFF
Levodopa
IntakeOnset
Dyskinesia
End-of-Dose
Dyskinesia
Peak-Dose
Dyskinesia
Off-PeriodFreezing
TremorBradykinesiaFreezing
Tremor
-1
0
1EM G (m V )
Quad
-30
AC C - X (G)
-303
AC C - Y (G)
-303
AC C - Z (G)
-1
0
1EM G (m V )
TA
-303
AC C - X (G)
-303
AC C - Y (G)
4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
-303
AC C - Z (G)
Tim e ( s)
-1
0
1EMG (mV)
Quad
-30
ACC-X (G)
-303
ACC-Y (G)
-303
ACC-Z (G)
-1
0
1EMG (mV)
TA
-303
ACC-X (G)
-303
ACC-Y (G)
8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
-303
ACC-Z (G)
Time ( s)
Walking While OnDyskinesia While SittingTremor While Sitting Walking While Off
-5000
500EMG
(V)
Deltoid
-3
-2-1
ACC-X (G)
-2-1
0
ACC-Y (G)
-2-1
0ACC-Z (G )
-5000
500EMG
(V)
Biceps
-1
01
ACC-X (G)
-2
-10
ACC-Y (G)
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14-2
-1
0ACC-Z (G )
Time (s)
-5000
500EMG
(V)
Deltoid
-3-2
-1A CC- X( G )
-1
01
A CC- Y ( G )
-1
01
A CC- Z ( G )
-5000
500EMG
(V)
Biceps
-1
0
1
A CC- X( G )
-1
0
1
A CC- Y ( G )
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
-2
-10
A CC- Z ( G )
Time (s)
Sample data from a patient asked to sit quietly and not move. The
figure on the left was taken during his Off period when he was experi-
encing Tremor and on the right during his On w/ Dyskinesia period.
Data were recorded from the Anterior Deltoid (Ch1-4) and Biceps
brachii (Ch 5-8). EMG signals are in black; ACC signals are in blue.
Sample data from the same patient while walking. The figure on the
left was taken during his On period when he walked normally with-
out movement disorders and on the right during his Off period
when he had Akinesia or Freezing. Data were recorded from the
Quadraceps (Ch1-4) and Tibialis Anterior muscles (Ch 5-8).
Sensor Data from PD Patient
Preliminary Results
Bradykinesia
Dyskinesia
Tremor
Sitting
Standing
Walking
44 45 46 47 48A
P
44 45 46 47 48 49 minsA
P
44 45 46 47 48A
P
44 45 46 47 48A
P
44 45 46 47 48A
P
44 45 46 47 48A
P
P = Present
A = Absent
49 mins
49 mins
49 mins
49 mins
49 mins
Results from the algorithms provide automatic classification of mobility
states and movement disorders in a patient with PD transitioning fromOff to On-with-Dyskinesia. Classification is made solely on thebasis of EMG and ACC data. Only 4 of the 8 sensors were used for
the mobility analysis. No attempts were made to reduce the number
of requisite sensors (to less than 8) for identifying movement disor-
ders at this stage of algorithm development. Classification resolu-
tion is 1s and the sensitivity is 95% based on the interpretation of
videotaped data by movement disorder specialists.
The patient is a 73 y.o. male with advanced PD characterized by
severe motor fluctuations.
Goal: To developa Personal Status Monitor (PSM) that automatically identifies and tracksmovement disorders, medication states, and mobility in patients with Parkinsons disease.
Project 1: Technical Infrastructure Project 2: Clinical Application to PD
Summary Results - Year 2
We have built a custom hybrid surface sensor acquisition system for acquiring EMG and ACC signals from patients and control subjects. Algorithm development has been enhanced for standardized and singular activities using a blackboard-based signal processing system and time-dependent neural networks.
Preliminary classification results for patients with Parkinson's disease resulted in 95% sensitivity for mobility and movement disorders during standardized and singular activities.
We are currently preparing to acquire sufficient data to enhance the algorithms for monitoring patients during unconstrained free-form activities.
Blackboard Database
Knowledge Sources
DATA
Acquisition