WE3.L09 - EVALUATION OF SYSTEM POLARIZATION QUALITY FOR POLARIMETRIC SAR IMAGERY AND TARGET...
Transcript of WE3.L09 - EVALUATION OF SYSTEM POLARIZATION QUALITY FOR POLARIMETRIC SAR IMAGERY AND TARGET...
EVALUATION OF SYSTEM POLARIZATION QUALITY FOR POLARIMETRIC SAR IMAGERY
AND TARGET DECOMPOSITION
Yanting Wang, Thomas L. Ainsworth and Jong-Sen Lee
Naval Research Laboratory
April 12, 2023 IGARSS 2010, Hawaii 2
Objectives• PolSAR observations
– Subject to polarization distortions
• How good the polarization purity needs to be?– Evaluate the various effects of polarization distortions – Quantify the polarization quality of the PolSAR system
for polarimetric imagery
tvh
vh
vv
hh
r kg
g
g
g
k
1
cossin
sincos
cossin
sincos1
t
ttrm
S
XSXS
Faraday Rotation
Cross-talk
Channel Imbalance
April 12, 2023 IGARSS 2010, Hawaii 3
Overview of Polarization Distortion
• The apparent errors on the measurements depend on the distortion type and the targets
k
1
1
1
sphere
20
01
k
Channel Imbalance
Cross-talk
bouncedouble
2
2
10
01
sphere
2
2
12
21
ObservationsSurface Channel
Double bounceChannel
2
12 k
2
1 2k
22
0
0
22
plane-di 45o0
0
k
k
0
00 )1(2 k
22
Cross-polChannel
0
To investigate the impact of polarization quality is not trivial task in a practical system.
April 12, 2023 IGARSS 2010, Hawaii 4
Polarization Distortion Model
• Distortions act as a linear transformation over the target polarimetric response
• The measurement error vector
• Its norm can be used to evaluate the error budget on the observations
ttrm XSXS )()( trTtm SXXS vecvec
[D]:: The distortion matrix
)()( tSIDe vec
e We like to evaluate the error vector over the whole vector space {vec(St)}.
April 12, 2023 IGARSS 2010, Hawaii 5
Polarization Quality Metric• Take its maximum to decouple the system
characteristics from targets
• Adjust for natural targets which are reciprocal.
[A4]:: “adapter” translates reciprocal scattering to general response
)(
1
0
0
0
0
21
21
0
0
0
0
1
)( tSIDe vec
444
t
t4
S
AIDIDAAID
S
SAID
t
)()()(
)(
)()(max
*max2
TT
vec
vecMNE
)(max
tS S
e
t vec MNE: Maximum Normalized Error
April 12, 2023 IGARSS 2010, Hawaii 6
Polarization Quality Metric
• The MNE forms an appealing metric– Advantage: it is defined over the system polarization
distortions ( ) only– It caps the error budget in the whole target space
• The metric is polarization invariant– Induced matrix norm is invariant to unitary
transformation
rTt XX
))()(( ** UXUUSUUXUS tT
tT
rT
new
*
**
**
)()(
))()((
)()(
UUDUU
UUXXUU
UXUUXUD
T
rTt
TT
rTT
tT
new
April 12, 2023 IGARSS 2010, Hawaii 7
Typical Distortion – channel imbalance
• Channel imbalance includes two parts: gain mismatch and phase mismatch
jaek
11
April 12, 2023 IGARSS 2010, Hawaii 8
Typical Distortion – cross-talk
• Cross-talk also involves both the isolation level and the phase shifts.
1
1
1
12 v
h
j
j
v
v
h
h
e
e
g
e
g
e
Assume
dB20
April 12, 2023 IGARSS 2010, Hawaii 9
Typical Distortion – Faraday rotation
• Low frequency spaceborne radar observations are also subject to propagation distortions
cossin
sincos
April 12, 2023 IGARSS 2010, Hawaii 10
Polarimetric Decompositions• Normalized error for decompositions
• The maximum normalized error can be applied to evaluate the decomposition errors given a known set of decomposition bases
xBxbbbSt nvec ˆˆˆ)( 21 xDBS )( mvec
xBIDBxBIDBBBe )()()( 1 HorthonomalHH
k
kdk
kk SPAN
xxe
2)(2
In case of orthogonal decomposition bases, or effectively orthogonal polarization basis change, the maximum decomposition error is same as the MNE.
Pauli based decomposition falls into this category.
April 12, 2023 IGARSS 2010, Hawaii 11
Example Scene
• E-SAR L-band Image
Applied with a known distortion:
dB20
528.0009.0470.0
009.0010.0009.0
470.0009.0462.0
5.713.0
5.714.52
3.04.52
oo
oo
oo
jj
jj
jj
ee
ee
ee
222.0023.0282.0
023.0022.0047.0
282.0047.0756.0
8.146.164
8.145.133
6.1645.133
oo
oo
oo
jj
jj
jj
ee
ee
ee
290.0010.0087.0
010.0250.0022.0
087.0022.0460.0
0.1026.15
0.1027.113
6.157.113
oo
oo
oo
jj
jj
jj
ee
ee
ee
1) Double bounce scattering
2) Volume scattering
3) Surface scattering
April 12, 2023 IGARSS 2010, Hawaii 12
Pauli Based Decomposition
• The MNE is shown as a tight upper bound.
April 12, 2023 IGARSS 2010, Hawaii 13
Krogager Based Decomposition
• The decomposition is more affected by this distortion configuration– Helix scattering and double bounce scattering are not
orthogonal.– It is sensitive to the cross-talk phase terms.
Decomposition Error: -8.4 dB
April 12, 2023 IGARSS 2010, Hawaii 14
Krogager Based Decomposition
• Individual decomposition channels
April 12, 2023 IGARSS 2010, Hawaii 15
Freeman-Durden Decomposition
• High polarization distortions more likely violate the model assumption
Flip of surface scattering and double bounce scattering after the random volume component removed
April 12, 2023 IGARSS 2010, Hawaii 16
Freeman-Durden Decomposition
• Individual decomposition channels
April 12, 2023 IGARSS 2010, Hawaii 17
Eigen-based Decomposition
• Eigen-based decomposition is more resilient to this distortion configuration
April 12, 2023 IGARSS 2010, Hawaii 18
MNE as Evaluation Baseline
• Simulation Settings
DISTORTION CONFIGURATION ON THE NATURAL TARGETS OF CANONICAL SCATTERING MECHANISMS
Distortion Range
Channel Imbalance Differential Gain: uniform in [-1, 1] dB
Differential Phase: uniform in [-20, 20] degrees
Cross-talk Isolation: uniform in [-50, -10] dB
Phase h: uniform in [-180, 180] degrees
Phase v: uniform in [-180, 180] degrees
Faraday Rotation Faraday angle: uniform in [0, 10] degrees
April 12, 2023 IGARSS 2010, Hawaii 19
MNE as Evaluation Baseline• Decomposition errors versus MNE over the
selected canonical scattering mechanism
April 12, 2023 IGARSS 2010, Hawaii 20
MNE as Evaluation Baseline
• The metric provides a convenient tool to connect PolSAR image quality with interacting polarization distortions.
• Reference table for the MNE metric as evaluated at various polarization distortions
Faraday Angles 0o 1o 2o 3o 5o 10o 20o Channel Imbalance – Amplitude 0.1 dB -32.7 -28.1 -22.8 -19.4 -15.1 -9.1 -3.2 0.3 dB -22.9 -22.4 -20.7 -18.4 -14.7 -9.0 -3.1 0.5 dB -18.3 -18.1 -17.5 -16.5 -13.9 -8.7 -3.0 Channel Imbalance – Phase 1o -29.1 -26.8 -22.6 -19.4 -15.1 -9.2 -3.3 3o -19.6 -19.4 -18.6 -17.3 -14.3 -9.0 -3.3 5o -15.2 -15.1 -14.8 -14.3 -12.9 -8.6 -3.2 Cross-talk – Isolation Level -30 dB -24.0 -22.8 -20.5 -18.3 -14.7 -9.1 -3.3 -20 dB -14.1 -13.9 -13.6 -13.1 -11.7 -8.2 -3.2 -15 dB -9.2 -9.2 -9.1 -8.9 -8.4 -6.7 -3.0
April 12, 2023 IGARSS 2010, Hawaii 21
Questions and Comments?
April 12, 2023 IGARSS 2010, Hawaii 22
Generalize to Arbitrary Polarization Mode
• The MNE definition can be further generalized to other polarization modes such as dual-pol mode
)(2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
22
11
mrv
tv
rv
tv
rh
tv
rh
tv
rv
th
rv
th
rh
th
rh
th
tv
th
mrv
rh
rv
rh
vecpp
pp
pp
pp
pp
pp
pp
pp
p
p
pp
pp
S
SV
22
1
2
1
2
1
2
1 )( 4AID
rv
tv
rv
tv
rh
tv
rh
tv
rv
th
rv
th
rh
th
rh
th
pp
pp
pp
pp
pp
pp
pp
ppMNE
2
)(0
0
0
04AID
t
v
tv
th
th
p
p
p
pMNE
Dual-pol modeObservations
Dual-pol modeMNE
Receiving at H/V
April 12, 2023 IGARSS 2010, Hawaii 23
Decomposition Error Profiles
April 12, 2023 IGARSS 2010, Hawaii 24
Decomposition Error Profiles