WBCSD Measuring Impact Framework

14
An Introduction to the WBCSD Measuring Impact Framework September 2013

description

Short presentation about the Measuring Impact Framework of the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), which was developed in collaboration with over 20 WBCSD member companies, reviewed by 15 external experts, and co-branded by the International Finance Corporation (IFC). It is designed to help companies understand their contribution to society and use this understanding to inform their operational and long-term investment decisions, and have better-informed conversations with stakeholders.

Transcript of WBCSD Measuring Impact Framework

An Introduction to the WBCSD Measuring Impact Framework

September 2013

The business case for measuring socio-economic impact

WBCSD Measuring Impact Framework

– Approach

– Methodology

Case studies

Key lessons & conclusions

Presentation overview

Why do companies measure their socio-economic impact?

The Framework aims to help companies measure and assess their societal contribution and use this understanding to inform operational and future investment decisions

It is also designed to: underpin the business license to operate; improve the quality of stakeholder

engagement; help manage risks more effectively enhance the business contribution to society improve efficiencies understand the role of business vis a vis

governments

Measuring Impact Framework

Built by business for business (working group of 20+ companies)

Co-branded with the International Finance Corporation (IFC)

Starts from what business does – business

Moves beyond traditional reporting

Encourages stakeholder engagement

Flexible

Complements existing tools

Externally reviewed (WRI, GRI, Harvard, IFC, Oxfam, etc.)

Key features of the Framework

3 components of the Framework

Online applicationThe business case

Methodology

Methodology

Stakeholder engagement

Step 1 - Set boundaries

Step 2 – Measure direct and indirect impacts

Step 3 – Assess contribution to development

Step 4 – Prioritize management

response

Measuring Impact Framework

Decision by individual companies

Merging two perspectives

Development/societal perspective

Economic Growth

Poverty Alleviation

Education

Social Stability

Public Health

Human Rights

Governance

Capacity Building

Enterprise Development

Environmental Sustainability

Broader development contribution

Bu

sin

ess

per

spec

tive

Infrastructure

Products and Services

Jobs

Skills and Training

Procurement

Taxes

Corporate Governance

Environmental Management

Business activity

Direct impacts

Indirect impacts

Business activities (STEP 1)

• Corporate Governance• Environmental Management

Governance & Sustainability

• Infrastructure• Products & ServicesAssets

• Jobs• Skills & TrainingPeople

• Taxes• Procurement

Financial Flows

Mapping the impacts (STEP 2)

Direct

Direct

Indirect

Indirect

Indirect

Activity

Activity

Indirect

DirectIndirect

CONTEXTUAL UNDERSTANDING

Decision making framework: response to impacts (STEP 3 & 4)

MITIGATE

PARTNER

SCALE UP

LEVERAGE

DIRECT

INDIRECT

NEGATIVE POSITIVE

Optional: StakeholderEngagement

Case studies on application of the WBCSD framework

Eskom – Measuring its footprint in South Africa

Nestlé – Developing & piloting inclusive business models

Saipem – Measuring social value creation at fabrication yard in Indonesia

Newmont Ahafo Gold – Business linkages with local communities

Ecosecurities – Project development tool for CDM & voluntary carbon markets

Success of the methodology:

– Positive user response

– Evidence of use for business decision-making processes

– Results chain & indirect impacts

– Stakeholder engagement

Challenges:

– Analyzing complex development issues

– Location/context specific (no aggregation)

– Examining negative impacts

– Rapidly emerging impact measurement ‘landscape’

Lessons & conclusions

www.wbcsd.org/impact.aspx

Kitrhona [email protected]

Download & more information