Ways of supporting our colleagues to support their students and improve our training Inga Karton...

20
Ways of supporting our colleagues to support their students and improve our training Inga Karton Estonian Academy of Security Science; University of Tartu, Estonia [email protected] Tõnu Jürjen University of Tartu, Estonia [email protected] Ulvi Uulimaa-Margus Estonian Academy of Security Science, Estonia [email protected] 1

Transcript of Ways of supporting our colleagues to support their students and improve our training Inga Karton...

Page 1: Ways of supporting our colleagues to support their students and improve our training Inga Karton Estonian Academy of Security Science; University of Tartu,

Ways of supporting our colleagues to support their

students and improve our trainingInga Karton

Estonian Academy of Security Science; University of Tartu, [email protected]

Tõnu JürjenUniversity of Tartu, Estonia

[email protected] Ulvi Uulimaa-Margus

Estonian Academy of Security Science, Estonia

[email protected]

Page 2: Ways of supporting our colleagues to support their students and improve our training Inga Karton Estonian Academy of Security Science; University of Tartu,

Aims

• Overview of study: – Student extrinsic and intrinsic motivation and

learning styles: surface and deep approach

• Role of importance and confidence in learning

• Supporting confidence: affirmations• Sharing new exercises

2

Page 3: Ways of supporting our colleagues to support their students and improve our training Inga Karton Estonian Academy of Security Science; University of Tartu,

What influencing learning?

• Deep approach to learning • Surface approach to learning• Intrinsic motivation• extrinsic motivation• Study motivation

– Motivation is important to initiate and stay on track when studying

– Students that are motivated intrinsically are more committed to study because the exercise or the process is interesting for them

» Biggs and Tang (2008)

Page 4: Ways of supporting our colleagues to support their students and improve our training Inga Karton Estonian Academy of Security Science; University of Tartu,

Study

• 157 students participated in the survey, 87 men and 69 women, 64 day and 93 distance students, ages 19 to 53– day students and distance students of professional higher

education; distance students of the Master’s program of EASS

• The study motivation – 14 statements about intrinsic and extrinsic motivation

• The approach to learning – Biggs, Kember ja Leung (2001) Study Process Questionnaire– 20 question Estonian version adapted by Valk, Marandi and Pilt

(2006)

• The commitment to study – questions about time spent on studying vs. free time activities,

and time spent interacting with other students

4

Page 5: Ways of supporting our colleagues to support their students and improve our training Inga Karton Estonian Academy of Security Science; University of Tartu,

Correlations with intrinsic and extrinsic motivation

Extr. Mot

Intr. Mot

intrinsic motivation ,54***

deep approach to learning (motive) ,34** ,24*

deep approach to learning (strategy) ,24* ,41***

surface approach to learning (M) ,01 -,23*

surface approach to learning (STR) ,28* ,10

deep approach to learning ,33** ,41***

surface approach to learning ,16 -,10

GPA ,09 ,19

N=79; ***p<.001. **p<.01. *p<.05 5

Page 6: Ways of supporting our colleagues to support their students and improve our training Inga Karton Estonian Academy of Security Science; University of Tartu,

Linear regression to intrinsic motivation

6

Page 7: Ways of supporting our colleagues to support their students and improve our training Inga Karton Estonian Academy of Security Science; University of Tartu,

Linear regression to intrinsic motivation

7

Page 8: Ways of supporting our colleagues to support their students and improve our training Inga Karton Estonian Academy of Security Science; University of Tartu,

Linear regression to deep approach to learning

8

Page 9: Ways of supporting our colleagues to support their students and improve our training Inga Karton Estonian Academy of Security Science; University of Tartu,

Linear regression to surface approach to learning

9

Page 10: Ways of supporting our colleagues to support their students and improve our training Inga Karton Estonian Academy of Security Science; University of Tartu,

Interactions btw learning approach and motivation

deep approach to learning

R²=.35

intrinsic motivation

R²=.43

extrinsic motivation

R²=.24

surface approach to learning

R²=.08

.58***

.51***

.40*** .30**

.28**

.23**

10

Page 11: Ways of supporting our colleagues to support their students and improve our training Inga Karton Estonian Academy of Security Science; University of Tartu,

Evaluation of importance and self-efficacy

„How important is that you will learn at school?

Rate 0-10: 0- not important at all; 10- very important

How sure you are if you decide to learn then you will be able to do that?

Rate 0-10: 0- I’m not sure at all; 10- I’m very sure

11

Page 12: Ways of supporting our colleagues to support their students and improve our training Inga Karton Estonian Academy of Security Science; University of Tartu,

4 profile of studentsHigh self-efficacy Low importance

High importance High self-efficacy

Student is sure that she/he can learn in the case if he/she considering that learning is important but he/she is not

convinced that he/she want to study

Student understand that learning is important and believing that

he/she will be successful in that

Student don’t see learning important and he/she do not believe that he/she will be

successful if he/she try

Here is the problem the belief that he/she will success if they try.

Here the problem is not in unwillingless to learn, because

he/she is showing their will

Low importance Low self-efficacy

High importance Low self-efficacy

12

Page 13: Ways of supporting our colleagues to support their students and improve our training Inga Karton Estonian Academy of Security Science; University of Tartu,

Exercise: Part I

• Please think about one particular very unpleasant person in your life

– Please rate: how much you like this person: – “0” – I do not like her/him at all; “10” – I like

her/him very much • write the number down

13

Page 14: Ways of supporting our colleagues to support their students and improve our training Inga Karton Estonian Academy of Security Science; University of Tartu,

Exercise: Part I

• Next please think about one very pleasant person in your life

– Please rate: how much you like this person: – “0” – I do not like her/him at all; “10” – I like

her/him very much • write the number down

14

Page 15: Ways of supporting our colleagues to support their students and improve our training Inga Karton Estonian Academy of Security Science; University of Tartu,

Exercise: Part II

• Please write down one compliment or some affirmation to this very unpleasant person – 3 minutes

15

Page 16: Ways of supporting our colleagues to support their students and improve our training Inga Karton Estonian Academy of Security Science; University of Tartu,

Exercise: Part II

• Please write down one compliment or some affirmation to this very pleasant person– 3 minutes

16

Page 17: Ways of supporting our colleagues to support their students and improve our training Inga Karton Estonian Academy of Security Science; University of Tartu,

Exercise: Part III• Now please re-rate how much you like this

unpleasant person:– “0” – I do not like her/him at all; “10” – I like

her/him very much • write the number down

• And how much you like this pleasant person: – “0” – I do not like her/him at all; “10” – I like

her/him very much • write the number down

17

Page 18: Ways of supporting our colleagues to support their students and improve our training Inga Karton Estonian Academy of Security Science; University of Tartu,

Feedback

• What happened?

• Which theoretical backgrounds this exercise may affect?

18

Page 19: Ways of supporting our colleagues to support their students and improve our training Inga Karton Estonian Academy of Security Science; University of Tartu,

ReferencesBiggs, J. and Tang, C. (2008). Õppimist väärtustav õpetamine ülikoolis [Teaching for Quality Learning

at University: What the Student Does]. Tõlge eesti keelde: T. Pill.Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus. (Original is published Society for Research into Higher education and Open University Press 2007).

Biggs, J., Kember, D., Leung, Y. P. (2001). The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133-149.

Bye, D., Pushkar, D., Conway, M. (2007). Motivation, Interest, and Positive Affect in Traditional and Nontraditional undergraduate Students. Adult Education Quarterly, Vol. 57, 2: 141-158. Retrieved October 20, 2009 from EBSCOhost.

Evans, C. J., Kirby, J. R., and Fabrigar, L. R. (2003). Approaches to learning, need for cognition, and strategic flexibility among university students. British Journal of Educational Psychology 73, 507–528. Retrieved March 10, 2010 from EBSCOhost.

Kiguwa, P., Silva, A. (2007). Teaching and learning: addressing the gap through learning styles. South African Journal of Psychology 37 (2) , 354-360. Retrieved March 10, 2010 from EBSCOhost.

Markland, D., Ryan R.M., Tobin V.J. & Rollnick, S. (2005) Motivational Interviewing and Self-determination Theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24, 811-831.

Miller, B. (2004). Toward a Theory of Motivational Interviewing. Online slide presentation. Kätte saadav MI kodulehelt www.motivationalinterview.org/

Rollnick, S., Miller, W.R., & Butler, C.C. (2008). Motivational Interviewing in Health Care. The Guilford Press: New York.

Valk, A., Marandi, T., Pilt, L., Villems, A., Ruul, K. (2006). Kuidas toetada sügavat õppimist ülikoolis? Tartu Ülikool. Retrieved October 20, 2009 from www.ut.ee/orb.aw/class=file/action=preview/id=221382/sugav_oppimine.pdf.

19

Page 20: Ways of supporting our colleagues to support their students and improve our training Inga Karton Estonian Academy of Security Science; University of Tartu,

Thank you!

20