Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

196
Engineering Report W W A A T T E E R R S S T T R R E E E E T T C C I I N N E E M M A A T T R R A A F F F F I I C C I I M M P P A A C C T T S S T T U U D D Y Y VILLAGE OF NEW PALTZ ULSTER COUNTY, NEW YORK PREPARED FOR: MOVING PICTURES PARTNERS, INC. 161 LIBERTYVILLE ROAD NEW PALTZ, NY 12561 PREPARED BY: WILLIAM D. FITZPATRICK PE, PTOE FITZPATRICK ENGINEERING, LLC 26 JULIA DRIVE HYDE PARK, NY 12538

description

“Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study”, created by independent expert William D. FitzPatrick, P.E., PTOE of FITZPATRICK ENGINEERING, LLC and formerly Regional Director of Traffic Safety for the Region 8 office of the New York State Department of Transportation found that based on an intensive parking review: “sufficient parking is available in the Village of New Paltz to accommodate the Water Street Cinema Films proposed development plans without causing any detrimental changes to the health, safety, and welfare of the Village.”

Transcript of Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Page 1: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Engineering Report

WWWAAATTTEEERRR SSSTTTRRREEEEEETTT CCCIIINNNEEEMMMAAA

TTTRRRAAAFFFFFFIIICCC IIIMMMPPPAAACCCTTT SSSTTTUUUDDDYYY

VILLAGE OF NEW PALTZ ULSTER COUNTY, NEW YORK

PREPARED FOR:

MOVING PICTURES PARTNERS, INC. 161 LIBERTYVILLE ROAD NEW PALTZ, NY 12561

PREPARED BY:

WILLIAM D. FITZPATRICK PE, PTOE FITZPATRICK ENGINEERING, LLC

26 JULIA DRIVE HYDE PARK, NY 12538

Page 2: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

1

Table of Contents

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................... 3

2.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 7

2.1 Project Description and Location ....................................................................................... 7

Figure 1: Project Location ................................................................................................... 8

Figure 2: Aerial Photograph ................................................................................................. 9

Figure 3: Floor Plan ............................................................................................................... 10

Figure 4: Critical Intersections ........................................................................................... 12

2.2 Study Methodology .......................................................................................................... 13

3.0 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ................................................................................ 14

3.1 Roadways ......................................................................................................................... 14

3.2 Intersections ..................................................................................................................... 15

3.2 Pedestrians ....................................................................................................................... 30

3.3 Existing Vehicular Volumes ............................................................................................ 32

Figure 5: Friday Evening Existing Volumes ........................................................................ 34

Figure 6: Saturday Mid-day Existing Volumes .................................................................... 35

Figure 7: Saturday Evening Existing Volumes .................................................................... 36

3.4 Accident History .............................................................................................................. 37

Table 1: Accident History .................................................................................................. 38

4.0 PROJECTED NO-BUILD VEHICULAR VOLUMES ...................................................... 42

Figure 9: Saturday Mid-Day No-Build Volumes ................................................................. 44

Figure 10: Saturday Evening No-Build Volumes ................................................................. 45

5.0 PROJECT GENERATED TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ........................................................ 46

5.1 Project Generated Vehicular Volumes ............................................................................. 46

Table 2: Trip Generation Based Upon Parking Code ............................................................ 49

Table 3: Trip Generation for a Multiplex Movie Theater .................................................. 50

5.2 Vehicle Arrival and Departure Distributions ................................................................... 51

Figure 11: Friday Evening Site Generation Volumes ........................................................ 52

Figure 12: Saturday Mid-Day Site Generation Volumes .................................................. 53

Figure 13: Saturday Evening Site Generation Volumes .................................................... 54

Page 3: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

2

Figure 14: Friday Evening Build Volumes ........................................................................ 55

Figure 15: Saturday Mid-Day Build Volumes ................................................................... 56

Figure 16: Saturday Evening Build Volumes .................................................................... 57

6.0 ANALYSIS ......................................................................................................................... 58

6.1 Capacity / Levels-of-service (LOS) ................................................................................. 58

Table 4: Capacity Analysis [LOS/Ave. Delay in Seconds] .................................................. 59

6.1.1 2014 Build Scenario ...................................................................................................... 60

7.0 PARKING ........................................................................................................................... 62

7.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 62

7.2 Existing Parking Inventory .............................................................................................. 63

Figure 17: Overall Site Plan .............................................................................................. 64

Figure 18: Area Municipal Parking Lots ........................................................................... 65

Table 5: Summary of Area Municipal Parking Lots .......................................................... 66

Figure 19: On-Street Parking ............................................................................................. 67

Table 6: Summary of On-Street Parking Locations ........................................................... 68

Table 7: Average Usage of Area Parking Lots & On-Street Parking ................................ 69

7.3 Privately Owned Parking Lots ......................................................................................... 70

8.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................. 73

APPENDICES .............................................................................................................................. 75

Appendix A: Level-of-Service Criteria .................................................................................. 76

Table 8: Signalized Level-of-Service ................................................................................ 77

Table 9: Unsignalized Level-of-Service ............................................................................ 77

Appendix B: Capacity Analyses ............................................................................................ 78

Appendix C: Manual Counts .................................................................................................. 79

Appendix D: Accident Data ................................................................................................... 80

Appendix E: Traffic Signal Data ........................................................................................... 81

Appendix F: Business Inventory ............................................................................................ 82

Page 4: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

3

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Moving Picture Partners Inc. (MPP), the project sponsor is proposing to create a community-based mission-driven art house theater, the Water Street Cinema (WSC), which will be housed in a newly constructed facility in New Paltz, N.Y., between the Water Street Market complex and Wurts Avenue. The Water Street Cinema will provide the residents of New Paltz and the surrounding communities with access to films and performances not generally available in Ulster County in a state-of-the-art viewing venue. MPP is a Not-For-Profit Corporation in New York State and is applying for 501(c)(3) status.

The Project site is located on the south side of Main Street, also known as Route 299, just to the east of the Wallkill River in the Village of New Paltz. For purposes of determining traffic flow impact, this Traffic Impact Study (TIS) assesses and compares existing traffic conditions to potential traffic conditions resulting from the completion of the proposed Water Street Cinema. Because the proposed Project site is situated within a village setting, the availability of existing parking spaces and the additional demand resulting from completion of the project will also be addressed in these TIS. In this regard, an inventory of existing parking availability and current parking practices is discussed and correlated to venues with similar characteristics in a similar setting.

The intersections deemed to be critical from a potential traffic impact perspective are:

Main Street (NYS Route 299) at North Chestnut Street (NYS Route 32) and South Chestnut Street (NYS Route 208)

Main Street at Wurts Avenue Main Street at Water Street and Huguenot Street

These intersections were identified with the assistance of the Town’s engineering consultant as part of a scoping discussion.

It is anticipated that completion of the proposed development will occur in 2014; thus, 2014 is to be considered the design year for the Water Street Cinema project.

Traffic counts at the noted critical intersections were obtained in April and May 2012. Manual traffic counts were taken at each critical intersection on Friday and Saturday evenings from 6 PM to 8 PM and on Saturday from 11:30 AM to 1:30 PM. These timeframes were chosen to correspond with peak hours of operation of the proposed cinema and cafe, and thus form the basic premise for this traffic and parking demand study. Observations of Municipal Parking Lots were also made at this time to ascertain occupancy levels.

Page 5: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

4

A detailed discussion with Village of New Paltz officials focused the Study on issues deemed important to smart growth and a recognition that the Village is an attraction for cultural and artistic reasons.

Information obtained from the New York State Department of Transportation1 forecast a per annum growth rate for the study area of approximately 1.0%. According to Village officials a growth rate of 1.5% has historically been used for area traffic impact studies.

Additionally, the scoping discussion with Village officials included some recognition of the proposed 950 new dormitory beds2 on the SUNY campus that may occur in the next 5 years. Therefore, although the dormitory project is speculative and well beyond the proposed Water Street Cinema design year, this Study utilizes a 2% per year growth rate to address background growth and the SUNY project to bring the 2012 existing volumes to the design year of 2014.

The generation analysis for a proposed project provides the anticipated traffic impact that can be expected as a result of that development. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) provides traffic and transportation professionals with a source document as a guide to trip generation rates for all land uses and building types. This document, Trip Generation Manual, 8th Edition, is updated periodically and details rates developed for the average weekday, Saturday and Sunday, during the peak hours of the generator and during the peak hours of the adjacent roadway traffic.

However, ITE recognizes that there will be land uses that do not fit precise database requirements, and thus it is suggested that local parameters be used to best address anticipated activity. And although from the above noted variables…potential low occupancy conditions, pedestrian influence in a walkable community, or infinite venue possibilities…one constant can be identified that in a worst-case sense spans all considerations. That constant is the parking requirement for the Village for this land use. We can assume full capacity reflected by the parking requirement of 66 vehicles (hence the worst-case scenario), and use that statistic despite the noted, factual variables.

In this way, the potential impact on vehicular traffic…the capacity of the adjacent intersections…can be measured, albeit in a far more onerous fashion, i.e., involving a set of conditions that will never be achieved since it is unlikely every seat in the theaters will be filled at the same time interval that no one arrives or leaves as a pedestrian (parked off-site) and that the particular event will involve non-group participation.

This Study utilized SYNCHRO Traffic Signal Software by Trafficware3, which is based upon the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual4. 1 Planning and Program Management Group, New York State Department of Transportation, Region 8. 2 It is also unclear what exactly the relationship is between dorm beds and vehicular generation in the Village given the underlying concept and the proximity of the campus to the Village CBD. 3 SYNCHRO 7, Traffic Signal Software, Trafficware Corporation, 2003 4 Special Report 209, 2000, published by the Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.

Page 6: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

5

This Traffic Impact Study has analyzed the impact of traffic generation forecast for the proposed Water Street Cinema project in relationship to the existing highway network. It has also examined the availability of parking for the Water Street Cinema and the impact the additional demand will have on the Village of New Paltz. The following findings are the result of this analysis and are meant to provide a foundation for the local decision making process.

The studied unsignalized and signalized intersections within the immediate area of the proposed WSC project are not significantly deteriorated by the application of the traffic generation from the proposed development. Therefore, the proposed Water Street Cinema project, as presented, shall have no significant impact on traffic operations on the adjacent roadway intersections as evaluated. It is clear that the Village of New Paltz is a destination for art, culture, entertainment, and general tourism, and therefore, at certain times of the year congestion is significant. The proposed Cinema will add to the allure of the Village but will do so, to a large part, as an added attraction for those visitors already enjoying the area’s highlights.

This Study also took a detailed look at the supply and demand of parking in the immediate area of the proposed Theater. Extensive data has been gathered and evaluated and more importantly, a similar facility located in a Village setting has been used as a real example of operational issues.

A comparison of the proposed Water Street Cinema to the long operating Upstate Films5 facility in Rhinebeck has been utilized in this parking analysis. The reason is simple since the surrounding physical and cultural environment for both facilities are almost identical. Similar to Upstate, WSC will be located in a popular historic and artistic setting in a busy multi-faceted village atmosphere. Both facilities benefit and suffer from heavily traveled state roadway infrastructure, but at the same time have the advantage of multi-use, shared parking opportunities that exist all around their sites. Both Villages have specific zoning requirements for parking. The Village of Rhinebeck in 1997 recognized the value and logic associated with shared parking when the Planning Board allowed the construction of the second screen (additional 88 seats) for Upstate based upon a parking study which showed the very same results this Water Street Cinema parking analysis shows, that there is sufficient shared parking surrounding these “walkable”6 communities sufficient to sustain theater service.

5 Upstate Films also has a theater in Woodstock, NY, however, its Rhinebeck facility has operated since 1972 in the very center of the Village. It has only a 21-space parking lot for its two screens and 244 seats. It operates seven days a week, year round, with 700+ shows per year. 6 Walkable communities have density, mixed use, transit, short blocks, and desirable services that are symbiotic in nature. What makes a neighborhood walkable?

A center: Walkable neighborhoods have a center, whether it's a main street or a public space. People: Enough people for businesses to flourish and for public transit to run frequently. Mixed income, mixed use: Affordable housing located near businesses. Parks and public space: Plenty of public places to gather and play. Pedestrian design: Buildings are close to the street, parking lots are relegated to the back.

Page 7: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

6

Based upon the parking that is available in the area based upon this intensive parking review, it is reasonable to conclude that sufficient parking is available in the Village of New Paltz to accommodate the Water Street Cinema Films proposed development plans without causing any detrimental changes to the health, safety, and welfare of the Village.

One reason that this Study concludes that parking will not be an issue is the fact that although a “walkable” community approach was not applied to the actual capacity analysis, the pedestrian accommodations within the Village will encourage pedestrian use and reduce vehicular circulation in and around the proposed Theater. The Village of New Paltz and NYSDOT have taken a number of measures to promote pedestrian safety and make the Village a pedestrian friendly area for the benefit of the entire community.

A safety analysis was conducted and resulted in no unusual patterns or number of incidents for this Village setting. Accidents typical of on-street parking (sideswipe) and periodic congestion (rear-end) were normal and are to be expected. The activity of the proposed Theater will not threaten this situation.

It is the conclusion of this detailed, extensive Study that the proposed Water Street Cinema will not have a negative impact on the operation of the Village’s infrastructure nor will it overtax its parking supply either on-site and off-site. Water Street Cinema therefore will be an asset to the walkable community goals of the Village of New Paltz, and will not hinder the health, safety, and welfare of its community.

Schools and workplaces: Close enough that most residents can walk from their homes. Complete streets: Streets designed for bicyclists, pedestrians, and transit.

Page 8: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

7

2.0 INTRODUCTION

Moving Picture Partners Inc. (MPP), the project sponsor is proposing to create a community-based mission-driven art house theater, the Water Street Cinema (WSC), which will be housed in a newly constructed facility in New Paltz, N.Y., between the Water Street Market complex and Wurts Avenue. The Water Street Cinema will provide the residents of New Paltz and the surrounding communities with access to films and performances not generally available in Ulster County in a state-of-the-art viewing venue.

Water Street Cinema (WSC) will primarily screen the best of independent, documentary, and world cinema; mixed with first-run mainstream films and classic films. Secondarily, WSC will present live musical and theatrical performances; alternative streaming content (i.e., opera, theater, music, etc.) and lectures. WSC's focus is on value to the community and providing a high quality cinema experience - viewing, sound, seating, concessions, service, and cleanliness. With four screens, WSC will provide sufficient diversity to attract on-going patronage.

MPP is a Not-For-Profit Corporation in New York State and is applying for 501(c)(3) status. Their mission statement is:

“…to inspire, inform and entertain through the universal language of cinema arts and to serve as a cultural and educational resource for all. MPP is dedicated to the exploration of cinema as an art form, a source of entertainment and an educational tool. MPP will provide venues for the screening of films not generally available in the county. It will promote and develop an understanding of and an appreciation for the art of film through the screening of films and the presentation of lectures, symposiums, public discussion and other activities which educate the general public in subjects such as film history, film critique and film making. MPP will promote and develop the appreciation of film in general by preserving the role of film as an enriching social, cultural and educational experience integral to the social fabric of local communities, to family life and to lifelong personal development. MPP is organized and operated exclusively for charitable and educational purposes.”

2.1 Project Description and Location

The proposed Water Street Cinema facility will include four screens with a total of 360 seats, as well as an 18-seat cafe. The Project site is located on the south side of Main Street, also known as Route 299, just to the east of the Wallkill River in the Village of New Paltz. It will be situated between the Water Street Market complex and Wurts Avenue. Figure 1 shows the project location on a local scale. Figure 2 is an aerial view of the site showing its village setting, and Figure 3 is a floor plan illustrating the features of the facility.

Page 9: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

8

Figure 1: Project Location

SITE

Page 10: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

9

Figure 2: Aerial Photograph

SITE

Page 11: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

10

Figure 3: Floor Plan

Page 12: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

11

For purposes of determining traffic flow impact, this Traffic Impact Study (TIS) assesses and compares existing traffic conditions to potential traffic conditions resulting from the completion of the proposed Water Street Cinema. Figure 4 depicts the critical intersections that will be analyzed in this Traffic Impact Study (TIS) for potential traffic operational impact. Because the proposed Project site is situated within a village setting, the availability of existing parking spaces and the additional demand resulting from completion of the project will also be addressed in these TIS. In this regard, an inventory of existing parking availability and current parking practices is discussed and correlated to venues with similar characteristics in a similar setting. Additionally, given the village setting of the site, pedestrian activity and provisions for pedestrian safety is part of this TIS.

The intersections deemed to be critical from a potential traffic impact perspective as shown in Figure 4 are:

(1) Main Street at Wurts Avenue (2) Main Street (NYS Route 299) at North Chestnut Street (NYS Route 32) and South

Chestnut Street (NYS Route 208) (3) Main Street at Water Street and Huguenot Street

The operating conditions at these intersections will be reviewed and recommendations will be advanced to accommodate the activity associated with the project.

Page 13: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

12

Figure 4: Critical Intersections

3

1

2

Page 14: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

13

2.2 Study Methodology

Throughout this Study, distinction is made between the existing traffic, which is traffic currently on the highway network, and no-build traffic, which is the existing volumes adjusted by a background growth factor projected to the year in which the proposed project is expected to generate additional traffic, i.e. the traffic that would exist on the system without the proposed project. Then the site-generated traffic7 is calculated based on historical databases and combined with the no-build traffic to form the build traffic volumes estimated to occur in the year of project completion, in this case in 2014.

The following is a brief description of the detailed tasks, which were a part of the analysis.

Information pertinent to the existing traffic, roadway and pedestrians was collected and analyzed relative to its affect on operating characteristics.

Field observations were made to observe the traffic movements within the existing roadway network to determine traffic patterns and distributions.

Manual vehicular traffic and pedestrian counts were conducted for the key intersections and roadways that would be affected by site generated traffic.

A trip generation analysis was conducted for the proposed land use development. A directional distribution analysis was conducted to distribute site-generated traffic. Capacity analyses of key intersections were conducted to determine if mitigating

measures would be necessary to maintain current operating conditions. An inventory of existing parking spaces in the vicinity of the proposed site was made. Field observations of parking practices and utilization of spaces were made to determine

availability for the additional demand. Conclusions of the traffic and parking impact of the proposed project were established

based upon the data and facts gathered in this Study.

7 Existing traffic is defined as all highway traffic which does not have the proposed development as its origin or destination; while site generated traffic is all traffic oriented to the proposed development.

Page 15: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

14

3.0 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS

3.1 Roadways

NYS Route 299 (Main Street) traverses east / west through Ulster County with its east terminus in the Town of Lloyd at Route 9W, and its west terminus at Route 44/Route 55 in Gardiner. Although it carries the designation of Route 299 through its entirety, its jurisdiction changes from New York State to Village of New Paltz to Ulster County. This study encompasses the portion of Route 299 between its intersection with Route 32/ Route 208, and Water Street. Within the study area the roadway is under the jurisdiction of the Village of New Paltz and is known as Main Street. It is marked as a two-lane roadway with turn lanes at its signalized intersection with Route 32/ Route 208. The 2009 Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT)8 along this section of roadway is 10551. The speed limit along Main Street is regulated by the Village wide 30 mph speed limit. Signing and pavement markings are in accordance with the NYS Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (NYSMUTCD). The pavement markings consist of double yellow centerlines, stop bars and lane lines and left turn arrows at the signalized intersection with Route 32/Route 208, and crosswalks at Route 32/Route 208, Wurts Avenue and at the Wallkill Valley Rail Trail.

Water Street is a short Village of New Paltz owned and maintained roadway. The width varies somewhat but on average is 22’ wide and carries one lane of traffic in each direction. Shoulders are grass/dirt and the pavement is in good to fair condition. It traverses in a north/south direction between Main Street and Mohonk Avenue/ Pencil Hill Road/ Plains Road. From that point Plains Road continues south towards Gardiner as a sparsely developed local roadway. Pencil Hill Road and Mohonk Avenue become part of a network of local streets serving residential neighborhoods as well as New Paltz University and NYS Route 208. The geometry of this short section of roadway is basically an “S” curve and includes a short but significant grade cresting at the entrance to the Water Street Market. However, it is straight on flat on its approach to Main Street. Development consists of The Groovy Blueberry, a retail clothing and accessory outlet at the corner of Water Street and Main Street, a residential structure and the only existing vehicular access to the Water Street Market. The Groovy Blueberry building also includes a few rental apartments. The Wallkill Valley Rail Trail crosses Water Street adjacent to the Water Street Market access drive. The speed limit is regulated by the Village wide 30 mph speed limit. Pavement markings consist of a stop bar at its intersection with Main Street and a crosswalk at the Rail Trail. The pavement is in good to fair condition with grass/dirt shoulders.

8 New York State Department of Transportation, Traffic Volume Report for Ulster County.

Page 16: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

15

Wurts Avenue is a short Village of New Paltz owned and maintained roadway. It traverses in a north/south direction between Main Street and Mohonk Avenue. It has a width of 30 feet and carries one lane of traffic in each direction. Parking is allowed on the west side of the roadway. It has curbs and sidewalks, which, like the pavement is in fair condition. It is part of a network of local streets serving residential neighborhoods as well as New Paltz University and NYS Route 208. The geometry of this short section of roadway is comprised of a mild curve and grade. Its roadside development is that of a typical residential village street. The speed limit is regulated by the Village wide 30 mph speed limit. Pavement markings consist of a stop bar at its intersection with Main Street.

3.2 Intersections Main Street (NYS Route 299) at North Chestnut Street (NYS Route 32) and South Chestnut Street (NYS Route 208) This intersection is controlled by a three-color traffic signal owned, operated, and maintained by NYSDOT (Signal # U-46). Route 299 (Main Street) running east/west consists of one combination through/right lane, and one left-turn lane on each approach. Route 32 (North Chestnut Street) is marked at this intersection for a dedicated left-turn lane and one combination through and right-turn lane. Route 208 (South Chestnut Street) is essentially one combination right through and left-turn lane. However, on the immediate approach to Main Street a solid white line about one car length long is marked on the pavement creating 2 lanes at the intersection. Although there are no significant grades at the intersection, westbound Route 299 approaches the intersection at a slight downgrade. Sight distance to the signal heads is unobstructed. The signal operation is fully actuated and consists of multiple phases with permissive/protected left-turn phases on Route 32 and Route 208. The intersection is equipped with pedestrian heads and an exclusive pedestrian phase. Right Turns on Red are prohibited.

Page 17: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

16

Aerial Photo of Route 299 at Route 32 and Route 208

Main Street at Wurts Avenue; This intersection is a “tee” intersection controlled by a stop sign on the Wurts Avenue approach, which enters Main Street from the south. Opposite Wurts Avenue is an exit only drive for Wells Fargo Bank. All three approaches to the intersection are comprised of single lanes of 15 feet, and are curbed. While the westbound Main Street approach is essentially flat, the eastbound Main Street approach to Wurts Avenue is an uphill grade of 6+/-%, and the northbound Wurts Avenue approach to Main Street is a slight downhill grade. Pavement markings at the intersection consist of double yellow centerlines on Main Street, a crosswalk on the east leg of Main Street and a stop bar on Wurts Avenue. The speed limit is regulated by the 30 MPH Village speed limit. Sight lines for vehicles exiting Wurts Avenue looking right towards the east is approximately 500 feet. Looking left towards the west the line of sight is approximately 450 feet. The sight line to the stop sign along Wurts Avenue is approximately 200 feet.

Page 18: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

17

The following photos depict this intersection.

Aerial photo of Main Street at Wurts Avenue

Page 19: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

18

Looking west along Main Street towards Wurts Avenue

Looking east along Main Street towards Wurts Avenue

Page 20: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

19

Looking north along Wurts Avenue towards Main Street

Looking west from Wurts Avenue

Page 21: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

20

Main Street at Water Street and Huguenot Street; This is a “four-way” intersection controlled by stop signs on Water Street and Huguenot Street. Each of the four approaches to the intersection are comprised of single 15 feet wide lanes with the pavement widening slightly on Water Street and Huguenot Street near the intersection. Motorists often use this extra width as an unofficial right turn lane. There are no significant grades on the water Street or Main Street approaches. However, Huguenot Street approaches Main Street at a slight down grade of 1.5 to 2%. Pavement markings at the intersection consist of double yellow centerlines on Main Street. The speed limit on the Main Street and Water Street approaches are regulated by the 30 MPH Village speed limit, and Huguenot Street is regulated by a 25 MPH limit. All approaches with the exception of Water Street are curbed. The Water Street approach has a grass/dirt shoulder.

The sight line for vehicles exiting Water Street looking to the right, and exiting Huguenot Street looking to the left is approximately 425 feet. Motorists looking left from Water Street and right from Huguenot Street have a sight line of approximately 200 feet. The steel bridge crossing the Wallkill River just west of Water Street limits these two sight lines. However, the line of sight is good (800+/-‘) for motorists travelling east along Route 299 towards the Water Street/Huguenot Street intersection. The sight line to the stop sign along Water Street is approximately 125 feet and 225 feet along Huguenot Street.

The following photos depict this intersection.

Page 22: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

21

Aerial photo of Main Street at Water Street and Huguenot Street

Looking west along Main Street towards Water Street and Huguenot Street

Page 23: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

22

Looking east along Route 299 towards Water Street and Huguenot Street

Looking west along Route 299 from Water Street

Page 24: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

23

Looking east along Main Street from Water Street

Looking west along Route 299 from Huguenot Street

Page 25: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

24

Looking east along Main Street from Huguenot Street

Looking north along Water Street towards Main Street

Page 26: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

25

Looking south along Huguenot Street towards Main Street

Water Street at Water Street Market Driveway; The Water Street Market driveway intersects with Water Street at an approximately 45 degree angle to form a three way intersection. The Wallkill Valley Rail Trail crosses both Water Street and the driveway at the intersection as well. All three approaches to the intersection are comprised of single lanes with grass shoulder, with grass shoulders on the southbound approach and a curb on the northbound approach. The southbound Water Street approach is essentially flat, the driveway approaches at a slight downgrade and northbound Water Street approaches the intersection at an approximately 4% upgrade. There are no pavement markings at the intersection with the exception of the crosswalk for the rail trail. A warning sign for the rail trail crossing is in place on the southbound approach. The speed limit is regulated by the 30 MPH Village speed limit. Sight line for vehicles exiting the driveway looking right is approximately 100 feet. Looking left the line of sight is approximately 200 feet. Sight lines can be improved by trimming brush along the east side of Water Street north of the driveway. Further recommendations for this intersection are the upgrade of the warning signs for the Wallkill Valley Rail Trail.

The following photos depict this intersection.

Page 27: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

26

Aerial photo of Water Street at Water Street Market Driveway

Ground view of Water Street at Water Street Market

Page 28: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

27

Water Street Market Driveway approach to Water Street

Water Street Market Driveway approach to Water Street

Page 29: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

28

Looking south along Water Street from the Water Street Market driveway

Looking north along Water Street from the Water Street Market driveway

Page 30: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

29

Northbound Water Street approach to the Water Street Market

Southbound Water Street approach to the Water Street Market

Page 31: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

30

3.3 Pedestrians

The Village of New Paltz and NYSDOT have taken a number of measures to promote pedestrian safety and make the Village a pedestrian friendly area. These measures include an exclusive pedestrian phase with pedestrian signal heads and crosswalks at the intersection of Main Street and Route 32 / Route 208. Crosswalks are also in place at the intersection of Main Street and Plattekill Avenue, on the Main Street westbound approach to Wurts Avenue, and on Main Street and Water Street at the Wallkill Valley Rail Trail crossings. In conjunction with the crosswalk on Main Street at the Rail Trail, advance warning signs, and pedestrian crossing location signs are on each approach. Additionally, removable crosswalk markers are placed on the centerline of Main Street during heavy pedestrian activity times as a traffic calming method. Because the Rail Trail crosses Main Street in close proximity to the Main Street entrance to the Water Street Market, individuals crossing to enter the complex also use the crosswalk.

The following photos depict the signing at the Rail Trail/Water Street Market crosswalk.

Westbound approach in advance of the crosswalk

Page 32: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

31

Westbound approach at crosswalk

Eastbound approach to crosswalk

Page 33: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

32

Crosswalk with traffic calming device in place

3.4 Existing Vehicular Volumes

Given the type of land use being proposed and the surrounding environment, it was appropriate to coordinate with Village engineers to determine the precise hours the roadway network would be analyzed.

Based upon this joint scoping approach, the specific hours of analysis was determined to be:

Friday evening from 6 to 8 PM;

Saturday mid-day from 11:30 AM to 1:30 PM;

Saturday evening from 6 to 8 PM

Traffic volumes at the critical intersections were documented with manual turning movement counts conducted during the weeks of April 23rd, May 7th, and May 14st. These observations included both vehicular and pedestrian activity.

Page 34: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

33

In order to assess the most potentially critical traffic impact, the highest 60 consecutive minutes of volumes were used for each critical intersection.

Figures 5, 6, and 7 summarize the vehicle movements at each critical intersection for Friday evening, Saturday mid-day, and Saturday evening.

The traffic count worksheets are provided in Appendix C.

Page 35: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

34

Figure 5: Friday Evening Existing Volumes

Page 36: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

35

Figure 6: Saturday Mid-day9 Existing Volumes

9 The capacity analysis is labeled “AM” but is the same “mid-day” timeframe analysis noted in the Study.

Page 37: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

36

Figure 7: Saturday Evening Existing Volumes

Page 38: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

37

3.5 Accident History

Information was requested and obtained from the New York State Department of Transportation’s Safety Information Management System for the period of time from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2011, which was the latest information available at the time of request. This information included Water Street, Wurts Avenue and Route 299 (Main Street) between its intersection with Route 32/Route 208 and Water Street. The NYSDOT information had been relied upon to be the best available source of data.

As part of the analysis, the accident rate for Main Street, stated in terms of “accidents per million vehicles”, was calculated from the information received. The rate was then compared to the average accident rate for similar state highways. The average accident rate was found on the New York State Department of Transportation website on Table ll titled Average Accident Rates For State Highways by Facility Type (Based on Accident Data December 1, 2008 To November 30, 2010). Since the rates on this table do not include Non-Reportable accidents, the calculated accident rate for Main Street also does not include Non-Reportable accidents. Non-Reportable accidents are accidents that do not involve an injury and do not meet the threshold property damage dollar amount. As a result of this analysis it was found that the accident rate on Main Street for the period of January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2011 is 2.25 ACC/MV, which is lower than the State average of 2.47.

In addition to the analysis above, a detailed review was made of the over-all information. It was found that the accident history does not indicate any problematic areas in terms of the number of accidents, patterns of occurrences, or contributing circumstances.

Table 1 provides a summary of the pertinent facts garnered from the NYSDOT data. The DOT data is contained in Appendix X.

Page 39: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

38

Table 1: Accident History

Location- # of

Incidents Date Class # of Vehicles –

Type of Incident Direction of Travel

Weather and/or

Pavement Condition

Contributing Circumstances

Water Street :

2 Non-intersection Accidents

6/22/2010 NR 2 – Rear End SB Dry Driver inattention

9/9/2010

NR

2 - Sideswipe

SB (parked Unk direction

Dry Improper turning

Wurts Avenue:

2 Non-intersection Accidents

11/21/2009

NR

2 - Side swipe

WB (backing) & EB (parked)

Dry Alcohol, Driver inattention

12/18/2010

NR

2 – Rear End

SB (parked) WB (backing)

Dry View obstructed

Route 299 – Ref Marker 299/8601/1058

2 Non-intersection Accidents

7/22/11 PD & I

1-Fixed Object EB Dry/Clear Illness

8/3/2011

PD 3 – Rear End/Sideswipe

EB & WB Dry/Clear Defective brakes

Route 299 – Ref Marker 299/8601/1058

6 Intersection Accidents (at Water St/Huguenot St

10/23/2009 PD & I 2 – Right Angle

NB & EB

Dry/Cloudy Failure to yield

12/13/2009 NR 2 – Rear End EB Snow/Sleet Unsafe speed

1/16/2011 PD 2 – Right Angle SB & EB Dry/Clear Failure to yield

2/13/2011 NR 2 – Right Angle

SE & NW Dry/Clear Driver inattention

7/7/2011 I 2 – Right Angle

NB & WB Dry/Clear

7/8/2011 PD & I 2 – Right Angle

NB & WB Wet/Rain Failure to yield

Route 299 – Ref Marker 299/8601/1059

6 Non-intersection

3/18/2009 PD 1 – Fixed Object EB Dry/Clear Obstruction/Debris

on roadway

4/18/2009

PD

2 – Backing

SB (backing) & EB (parked)

Dry/Clear Driver inattention

Page 40: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

39

Location- # of Incidents

Date Class # of Vehicles – Type of Incident

Direction of Travel

Weather and/or

Pavement Condition

Contributing Circumstances

Accidents

Route 299-Ref Marker 299/8601/1059

continued

4/25/2009 NR

2 – Right Turn WB (parked) & WB

Dry/Clear Improper turn

9/12/2009 PD

3 - Sideswipe EB & EB (parked)

Dry/Cloudy Alcohol

10/23/2010

NR

2 – Backing

SB (backing) & SB (parked)

Dry/Clear Unsafe backing

6/3/2011 PD 1 – Fixed Object WB Dry/Clear Brakes defective

Route 299 – Ref Marker 299/8601/1059

1 Intersection Accident (at Wurts Ave)

5/26/2011

NR

1 – Fixed Object NB Dry/Cloud

y Alcohol

Route 299 – Ref Marker 299/8601/1060

30 Non-intersection Accidents

1/16/2009 PD

2 - Backing NW (backing) & SB

Dry/Cloudy Unsafe backing

3/7/2009 PD

2 – Backing SB (backing) & NW

Dry/Cloudy Unsafe backing

3/9/2009 PD 2 – Right Angle

SB & WB Wet/Rain Failure to yield

ROW

11/19/2009 NR 2 – Rear End EB Dry/Clear Following too close

11/25/2009 PD 2 – Right Angle EB & SE Wet/Rain Improper turn

1/22/2010 NR 2 – Right Angle EB & SE Dry/Clear Failure to yield

ROW

9/15/2010 NR

2 - Sideswipe EB (parked) EB

Dry/Clear Driver inattention

1/29/2011 I 1 – Pedestrian EB Wet/Clear Aggressive driving/Road rage

4/30/2011 PD 2 – Right Angle

SB & WB Dry/Clear Failure to yield

ROW

5/13/2011 NR

3 - Sideswipe EB & EB (parked)

Dry/Clear Inexperience

Page 41: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

40

Location- # of Incidents

Date Class # of Vehicles – Type of Incident

Direction of Travel

Weather and/or

Pavement Condition

Contributing Circumstances

Route 299 – Ref Marker 299/8601/1060

Continued

5/31/2011 NR 2 – Right Angle

SB & WB

Dry/Cloudy Driver inattention

7/28/2011 PD 2 – Right Angle SB & EB Dry/Clear Failure to yield

ROW

1/16/2009 PD & I 2 – Right Turn WB & NW Wet/Clear Failure to yield

ROW

3/6/2009 NR 2 – Rear End NB & NB Dry/Clear Following too

close

5/30/2009 PD & I 1 – Pedestrian SE Dry/Clear Pedestrian error/confusion

8/11/2009 PD 2 – Left Turn EB & WB Dry/Clear Failure to keep

right

11/28/2009 NR 2 – Overtaking SB Dry/Clear Passing or lane usage improper

10/22/2010 PD 2 – Rear End EB Dry/Clear Following too close

10/29/2010 PD & I 2 – Rear End EB Dry/Clear Reaction to uninvolved vehicle

4/20/2011 NR 2 – Sideswipe NB & SB Wet/Rain

5/20/2011 NR 2 – Overtaking SB Dry/Clear Failure to keep right

5/30/2011 PD 2- Backing EB Dry

6/18/2011 PD 2 – Overtaking NB Dry/Clear Unsafe lane change

6/27/2011 NR 2 – Right Angle

NB & SE Dry/Clear

7/12/2011 NR 2 – Overtaking SB Dry/Clear 9/23/2011 NR 2 – Rear End NB Wet/Rain Driver Inattention

10/6/2011 NR 2 – Overtaking SB Dry/Clear Improper passing or lane usage

10/25/2011 PD 2 – Left Turn EB & WB Dry/Clear Driver Inattention

11/14/2011 NR 2 – Overtaking SB Dry/Cloudy

Failure to keep right

11/16/2011 PD & I 2 – Rear End NB Dry/Clear Alcohol Abbreviations: NR –Non-Reportable (no injury & does not meet threshold property damage $

PD-Property Damage

I-Personal Injury

Page 42: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

41

3.6 Current Public Transportation

Ulster County Area Transit (UCAT) provides public transportation within Ulster County. Special services include Senior Services, ADA Paratransit and a Rural Route Service. All buses are equipped with bicycle racks and are wheelchair equipped. There are several routes servicing the study area, including the New Paltz Loop, H - New Paltz/Highland, R - Kingston/New Paltz, W - New Paltz/Wallkill/Plattekill, X - New Paltz/Newburgh

Detailed information for the UCAT bus services can be found at the following website http://www.co.ulster.ny.us/ucat/schedule.html

Train service is provided via the Metro-North Hudson Line with the nearest train station located in the City of Poughkeepsie.

Page 43: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

42

4.0 PROJECTED NO-BUILD VEHICULAR VOLUMES

Information obtained from the New York State Department of Transportation10 forecast a per annum growth rate for the study area of approximately 1.0%. According to Village officials a growth rate of 1.5% has historically been used for area traffic impact studies.

Additionally, the scoping discussion with Village officials included some recognition of the proposed 950 new dormitory beds11 on the SUNY campus that may occur in the next 5 years. Therefore, although the dormitory project is speculative and well beyond the proposed Water Street Cinema design year, this Study utilizes a 2% per year growth rate to address background growth and the SUNY project to bring the 2012 existing volumes to the design year of 2014.

Figures 8, 9, and 10 depict the projected 2014 No-Build vehicular volumes for Friday evening, Saturday mid-day, and Saturday evening, respectively.

10 Planning and Program Management Group, New York State Department of Transportation, Region 8. 11 It is also unclear what exactly the relationship is between dorm beds and vehicular generation in the Village given the underlying concept and the proximity of the campus to the Village CBD.

Page 44: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

43

Figure 8: Friday Evening No-Build Volumes

Page 45: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

44

Figure 9: Saturday Mid-Day12 No-Build Volumes

12 The capacity analysis is labeled “AM” but is the same “mid-day” timeframe analysis noted in the Study.

Page 46: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

45

Figure 10: Saturday Evening No-Build Volumes

Page 47: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

46

5.0 SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC CONDITIONS

5.1 Site Generated Vehicular Volumes

The generation analysis for a proposed development provides the anticipated traffic impact that can be expected as a result of that development. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) provides traffic and transportation professionals with a source document as a guide to trip generation rates for all land uses and building types. This document, Trip Generation Manual13, 8th Edition, is updated periodically and details rates developed for the average weekday, Saturday and Sunday, during the peak hours of the generator and during the peak hours of the adjacent roadway traffic.

The Institute of Transportation Engineers defines a trip or trip end as “A single or one-direction vehicle movement with either the origin or destination (exiting or entering) inside a Study site. For trip generation purposes, the total trip ends for a land use over a given period of time are the total of all trips entering and all trips exiting a site during a designated time period.”14

Since these generated trips represent vehicles entering or exiting a site at its driveways, they are appropriate in determining the total traffic to be accommodated by not only the site driveways but on the adjacent roadway network.

Some land uses benefit from what is referred to as pass-by trips and diverted trips, which simply means that a certain percentage of potential patrons of the proposed land use are already on the adjacent roadway or other roadways in question (to be studied). Pass-by trips and to a lessor degree, diverted trips, are subtracted from the site’s generation when distributed to the roadway network15. This action recognizes that a certain number of patrons are already on the roadway network and will receive a service on the site as a second or even third purpose for being on the roadway.

A land use such as being proposed for the Water Street Cinema would certainly be one that pass-by or diverted trips would apply. The effect would be to reduce the vehicular trips associated with the site.

Similarly, the proposed Water Street Cinema being in the Village of New Paltz will rely and draw upon the nature and character of a walkable community. As discussed in the parking section of this Study, patrons will have the opportunity to park in municipal lots, on-street, and in private locations when such are available (banks when closed, restaurants when part of an itinerary, etc.), therefore, it is reasonable to deduce that some patrons will arrive and leave as pedestrians. The effect again would be to reduce the vehicular trips associated with the site. 13Trip Generation Manual, 8th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2008. 14 Trip Generation, 8th Edition, User’s Guide, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2008. 15 Such trips are not deducted for purposes of analyzing the site’s driveway activity.

Page 48: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

47

Another consideration in establishing site activity for an art theater use is to recognize that there are very real times of actual use; for instance occupancy rates for Monday through Thursday shows on a global national scale only 5%, i.e., only 5 out of 100 seats are filled. Obviously, weekend occupancy rates are higher but still the overall rate is only 15%. Further, art theaters are very seasonally oriented with the peak period November through March.

In light of this and although there are no firm plans at this stage of development, the applicant is in the planning phase for “special events” or additional uses of the facility.

Concepts being considered include special programs for movie fans (i.e., film series) and select community groups (i.e., seniors) for these days for times and days of low occupancy; live performances (music, lectures, dramatic performances, etc.), as well has hybrid showings of movies/lectures.

As noted, since the peak period for Art Cinemas is November – March, consideration of occasional live performances on weekend evenings during the summer would be realistic and beneficial to the community. In this same vein of community spirit, the applicant is contemplating offering one or more of the theaters for use by local organizations during the day for meetings/presentations/etc.

Following is a broad list of activities, in the words of the applicant that would be consistent with the applicant’s goals for the facility and the community’s overall involvement and acceptance of the artistic and educational opportunities.

o “Present retrospectives of great classic and contemporary filmmakers. When possible we will augment the educational value of these events with opportunities to “meet the artist”. We will invite production and performing artists to address our audiences.”

o “Sponsor film festivals and special series on topics of particular interest to the community including student filmmaker festivals for local schools. In addition we anticipate participating in existing film festivals in the region like the annual Woodstock Film Festival”.

o “Present speakers on topics related to the films and their contents. We expect to draw from the expertise at the local schools of higher learning (The State University at New Paltz, Vassar College, Marist College, Bard College) each of which has a vibrant film program, as well as the extensive film resources in New York City.”

o “Provide alternative content such as streamed opera, theater, and concerts; along with speakers offering educational talks on the content and thus increasing accessibility to the programs. We anticipate events along these lines at least twice a month.”

Page 49: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

48

o “Promote science education through films and expert speakers; and seek to increase visibility for films that probe science and technology; and depict scientists and engineers in fresh, entertaining or provocative ways. We intend to make use of programs similar to the “Science on Screen” at the Coolidge Corner Cinema, which creatively pairs screenings of classic, cult, and documentary films with lively introductions by notable figures from the world of science, technology, and medicine. Each film is used as a jumping off point for the speaker to reveal current scientific research or technological advances, providing the perfect combination of entertainment and enlightenment. We anticipate creating monthly events along these lines.”

o “Support local groups with screening and ancillary services customized to their specific needs (i.e., morning screenings for new mothers; matinees and transportation for seniors; midnight showings for hard studying students).”

o “Provide venues for the exhibition of the works of local filmmakers and discussions of filmmaking.”

o “Film series complementing activities at the local high schools and universities. For example, films related to conferences (i.e., IDMH Conference, NY Conference on Asian Studies, Hudson Valley writing conference, Women’s Studies Conference, foreign language film series linked with language teaching in local schools, etc.)”

o “Collaborate on joint programs with local schools (elementary, middle, high) around filmmaking and appreciation of cinema arts. We intend to provide film education programs for elementary school children via programs like “See ! Hear ! Feel”, which teaches third-grade students critical viewing skills and the techniques of telling a story through film. Using the cinema to spark their own creative expression, the children learn to write with clarity, confidence, and joy, and improve their own storytelling skills. The curriculum was designed by nationally known educator and media expert Anne Marie Santoro, at the direction of the Jacob Burns Film Center in Pleasantville, NY, where the program has been taught successfully to nearly 40,000 school children since 2001.”

Clearly, the possibilities are endless and exciting. However, it is difficult if not impossible to identify just one set of possible generating criteria equating to the number of vehicles potentially involved in these events, including film screenings. This facility is not designed to be a standard theater, as ITE’s customary database would suggest. It is not a “multiplex movie theater” as defined by ITE (see Table 3 at the end of this section of the Study), and therefore use of the ITE data would be erroneous.

Page 50: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

49

However, ITE recognizes that there will be land uses that do not fit precise database requirements, and thus it is suggested that local parameters be used to best address anticipated activity. And although from the above noted variables…potential low occupancy conditions, pedestrian influence in a walkable community, or infinite venue possibilities…one constant can be identified that in a worst-case sense spans all considerations. That constant is the parking requirement for the Village for this land use. We can assume full capacity reflected by the parking requirement of 66 vehicles (hence the worst-case scenario), and use that statistic despite the noted, factual variables.

In this way, the potential impact on vehicular traffic…the capacity of the adjacent intersections…can be measured, albeit in a far more onerous fashion, i.e., involving a set of conditions that will never be achieved since it is unlikely every seat in the theaters will be filled at the same time interval that no one arrives or leaves as a pedestrian (parked off-site) and that the particular event will involve non-group participation.

Using this methodology for estimating vehicle generation presents Table 2, which shows the split of activity (arrivals and departures) using the ITE ratio of such that has been determined over its data collection efforts at theaters in general. Although we are assuming the parking lot for the Water Street Market to be full, it will occur over time with arrivals, departures, and more arrivals, etc. Thus in any given time interval, in our case 60 minutes, the table values have been deduced by ITE observations.

Table 2: Trip Generation Based Upon Parking Code

Generator

Peak Hour Volumes FRIDAY EVENING

Peak Hour Volumes SATURDAY

AFTERNOON

Peak Hour Volumes SATURDAY EVENING

ENTER EXIT TOTAL ENTER EXIT TOTAL ENTER EXIT TOTAL

Parking capacity: utilize 50% entering and 25% departing during peak 60 minutes

40

26 66 47 19 66 47 19 66

Internal Multi-Use Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Pass-By Trips

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total

40 26 66 47 19 66 47 19 66

Page 51: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

50

Table 3: Trip Generation for a Multiplex Movie Theater

Water Street Cinema Summary of Tr ip Generation Calculation For 360 Seats of Multiplex Movie Theatre May 24, 2012

Average Standard Rate Deviation

Avg. Weekday 2-Way Vo lume 0.00 0.00

7-9 AM Peak Hour Enter 0.00 0.00 7-9 AM Peak Hour Exit 0.00 0.00 7-9 AM Peak Hour Total 0.00 0.00

4-6 PM Peak Hour Enter 0.03 0.00 4-6 PM Peak Hour Exi t 0.05 0 . 00 4-6 PM Peak Hour Total 0.08 0.00

Friday 2 - Way Volume 0.00 0.00

Fri 4-6 PM Peak Hour Enter 0.06 0.00 Fri 4-6 PM Peak Hour Exit 0.04 0.00 Fri 4-6 PM Peak Hour Total 0.10 0.32

Saturday 2-Way Volume 0.00 0 . 00

Saturday 11 AM-1 PM Enter 0.07 0.00 Saturday 11 AM- 1 PM Exi t 0.03 0.00 Saturday 11 AM-1 PM Total 0.09 0.30

Saturday Peak Hour Enter 0.16 0.00 Saturday Peak Hour Exit 0.14 0.00 Saturday Peak Hour Total 0.30 0.56

Note: A zero indicates no data available. Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers

Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2008.

TRIP GENERATION BY MICROTRANS

Adjustment Factor

1.00

1. 00 1. 00 1.00

1. 00 1. 00 1. 00

1. 00

1. 00 1. 00 1.00

1.00

1. 00 1.00 1. 00

1. 00 1.00 1.00

Driveway Volume

0

0 0 0

11 18 29

0

22 14 36

0

23 9

32

58 50

108

Page 52: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

51

5.2 Vehicle Arrival and Departure Distributions

The distribution of the site generated vehicular traffic in most traffic impact studies normally follows the distribution of the existing volumes at the locations monitored during the manual counts. This concept was essentially used in this Study with the knowledge that the many variables involving generation suggest that multiple distributions are probable. However, the very nature of the worst-case scenario would indicate any possible change in distribution paths is secondary to the overstatement of generation.

Figure 11, 12, and 13 show the Friday evening, Saturday mid-day, and Saturday evening peak hour, respectively, site generated departure and arrival volumes for 2014, which when added to the corresponding No-Build volumes provide the anticipated 2014 Build volumes. The anticipated 2014 Build volumes are summarized in Figures 14, 15, and 16. These volumes have been used to measure the vehicular capacity and level-of-service (LOS) under the 2014 Build scenario at the critical intersections.

Page 53: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

52

Figure 11: Friday Evening Site Generation Volumes

Page 54: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

53

Figure 12: Saturday Mid-Day Site Generation Volumes

Page 55: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

54

Figure 13: Saturday Evening Site Generation Volumes

Page 56: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

55

Figure 14: Friday Evening Build Volumes

Page 57: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

56

Figure 15: Saturday Mid-Day16 Build Volumes

16 The capacity analysis is labeled “AM” but is the same “mid-day” timeframe analysis noted in the Study.

Page 58: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

57

Figure 16: Saturday Evening Build Volumes

Page 59: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

58

6.0 ANALYSIS

6.1 Capacity / Levels-of-service (LOS)

This Study utilized SYNCHRO Traffic Signal Software by Trafficware17, which is based upon the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual18.

The terminology used in identifying traffic flow conditions is “levels-of-service” (LOS). A LOS A represents the best condition and a LOS F represents the worst condition. A LOS C is generally used as a design standard while an intersection LOS D is acceptable during peak periods given that all approaches have LOS D or better. LOS E represents an operation at or near capacity.

In order to identify a signalized intersection’s level-of-service, the average amount of vehicle delay is computed for each approach to the intersection as well as for the over-all intersection. For unsignalized intersections, the average vehicle delay is computed for each critical movement to the intersection, which are normally the stop or yield controlled approaches along with the left-turns from the main roadways.

Appendix A, Tables 8 and 9 summarize the level-of-service criteria for the signalized and unsignalized intersections.

Each key location was analyzed for traffic operations on Friday evening, Saturday afternoon, and Saturday evening using the terms of the scoping review by the Village. Three scenarios using Existing, No-Build (projected) and Build (combined) volumes, were reviewed. The results of the capacity analyses are summarized in Table 3.

17 SYNCHRO 7, Traffic Signal Software, Trafficware Corporation, 2003 18 Special Report 209, 2000, published by the Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.

Page 60: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

59

Table 4: Capacity Analysis [LOS/Ave. Delay in Seconds]

INTERSECTION PEAK APPROACH EXISTING NO BUILD BUILD

HOUR 2012 2014 2014

1. Route 299 at Route 208 and Route 32

OVERALL C/28.5 C/30.7 D/35.4

Friday EB C/33.9 C/34.5 C/34.9

Evening WB C/31.9 C/32.2 C/31.6

NB D/38.1 D/46.9 E/71.6

SB B/12.7 B/13.8 B/14.6

Signalized

OVERALL C/28.0 C/30.3 C/33.4

Saturday EB C/30.2 C/32.6 D/35.2

Afternoon WB C/30.3 C/32.8 D/35.1

NB D/38.9 D/42.2 D/52.9

SB B/16.3 B/17.6 B/17.9

OVERALL C/27.0 C/28.5 C/30.5

Saturday EB C/30.1 C/31.7 C/34.4

Evening WB C/24.1 C/25.3 C/27.1

NB D/39.6 D/41.9 D/45.3

SB B/14.9 B/16.0 B/16.0

2. Route 299 at Friday NB C/16.6 C/16.6 C/16.8

Wurts Avenue Evening WB Lt A/0.6 A/0.6 A/0.6

Saturday NB C/20.5 C/22.2 C/23.8

Afternoon WB Lt A/1.0 A/1.0 A/1.9

Un-Signalized Saturday NB C/20.7 C/21.9 C/23.7

Evening WB Lt A/1.3 A/1.4 A/2.2

Page 61: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

60

3. Route 299

NB E/38.9 E/45.7 F/60.7

Water Street and Friday SB D/33.3 E/38.8 F/53.2

Huguenot Street Evening EB Lt A/1.6 A/1.6 A/1.7

WB Lt A/0.5 A/0.5 A/1.2

NB F/82.4 F/114.2 F/157.9

Un-Signalized Saturday SB D/33.2 E/39.3 E/46.1

Afternoon EB Lt A/1.7 A/1.8 A/1.8

WB Lt A/1.4 A/1.5 A/2.0

NB F/59.1 F/76.9 F/99.6

Saturday SB F/112.0 F/154.8 F/197.8

Evening EB Lt A/2.5 A/2.6 A/2.6

WB Lt A/1.5 A/1.5 A/2.0

6.1.1 2014 Build Scenario

The Build scenario analyzed the critical intersections based on Water Street Cinema generated traffic utilizing the local roadway system as per the anticipated distribution and the very conservative assumptions discussed in the generation section of this Study. The results of the capacity analyses are presented in detail below.

1. Route 299 at Route 208 (South Chestnut Street) and Route 32 (North Chestnut Street)

This signalized intersection under normal daily conditions operates fairly well and will continue to do so throughout the No-Build, and Build scenarios. The Saturday afternoon and evening LOS is maintained at LOS C into the Build set of conditions. The Friday evening review showed the Existing and No-Build LOS C slipped to LOS D in the Build scenario but only with an increase overall of less then 5 seconds of additional delay. It must be noted that when the heavy pedestrian flows utilize the protected pedestrian signal phase, all vehicular activity will cease movement and the LOS will reflect this safety-first condition. Given these results it can be

Page 62: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

61

concluded that the Water Street Cinema will not have a significant impact on the operation of this intersection even with the worst set of conditions applied to the analysis.

2. Route 299 at Wurts Avenue

For this unsignalized intersection the levels-of-service are maintained throughout the Existing, No Build, and Build scenarios, i.e. LOS C for traffic exiting Wurts Avenue. Left-turns into Wurts Avenue operate well at LOS A. Given these results it can be concluded that the Water Street Cinema will not have a significant impact on the operation of this intersection even with the worst set of conditions applied to the analysis.

3. Route 299 at Water Street and Huguenot Street

This unsignalized intersection currently operates as expected given the heavy Route 299 traffic flows and the relatively heavy side road activity, i.e., LOS E and F. This is not unusual and most unsignalized intersections on state highways with any degree of side road traffic will involve long delays in entering the artery. The No-Build and Build scenarios obviously continue these conditions. Fortunately, these delays have not resulted in an adverse accident history and therefore, a higher degree of traffic control, i.e., a three-color traffic signal, is unlikely to be approved by the New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) who has jurisdiction of Route 299. This intersection should be monitored by NYSDOT to ensure it continues to operate reasonably. Based upon this analysis the operation of the proposed Water Street Cinema does not cause this intersection to operate unreasonably.

Page 63: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

62

7.0 PARKING

7.1 Introduction

As noted previously in the “Introduction”, Moving Picture Partners Inc. (MPP) is a Not-For-Profit Corporation in New York State and intends to create a community-based mission-driven art house theater, the Water Street Cinema (WSC), which will be housed in a newly constructed facility in New Paltz, N.Y., between the Water Street Market complex and Wurts Avenue. The WSC will provide the residents of New Paltz and the surrounding communities with access to films and performances not generally available in Ulster County in a state-of-the-art viewing venue.

Similar to the Upstate Films facility in Rhinebeck, NY, Water Street Cinema will strive to be a community asset and as such, similar to Upstate, over time become a local cultural institution and organization devoted to the advancement of the art of filmmaking.

Water Street Cinema will primarily screen the best of independent, documentary, and world cinema; mixed with first-run mainstream films and classic films. Secondarily, WSC will present live musical and theatrical performances; alternative streaming content (i.e., opera, theater, music, etc.) and lectures. WSC's focus is on value to the community and providing a high quality cinema experience - viewing, sound, seating, concessions, service, and cleanliness. With four screens, WSC will provide sufficient diversity to attract on-going patronage.

As New Paltz is a destination in and of itself, much like Rhinebeck, for its cultural, historical, and scenic beauty, the intent of the Water Street Cinema is to add to the opportunities inherit in visiting the Village and the area’s attractions. Therefore, it is anticipated that the patronage of the Cinema will be a continuation of visitors’ enjoyment of the Village’s attributes…Historic Huguenot Street, the Stone Houses, restaurants, unique retail and market experiences; in other words, a trip involving multiple destinations and tasks.

Inherit in that scenario will be the concept of shared parking, which is a valid, promoted planning concept espoused as essential to smart growth in cities and villages, and other urbanized centers of concentrated public activity. This concept allows for logical, keen use of limited space while allowing for the growth of cultural and educational resources and services without mandating dedicated asphalt spaces for individual uses.

This concept and rational thinking enhance the community and in the case of The Water Street Cinema will naturally and conveniently provide integration into the village landscape.

Traffic engineers have determined through studies and observations that parking problems are often problems of perception. Unless parking is available in an area where it is highly visible, many people simply do not perceive that it exists. As shown by the WSC parking survey

Page 64: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

63

conducted for the applicant, shared parking opportunities within a reasonable distance of the WSC site exist and are especially available during the primary hours of the Water Street Cinema operation…Monday through Friday, 7:00 PM to 12:30 AM; Saturday, 1:00 PM to 12:30 AM; Sunday, 2:00 PM to 10:00 PM.

7.2 Existing Parking Inventory

As previously stated, the proposed Water Street Cinema will be located adjacent to the existing Water Street Market complex. The originally approved site plan for Water Street Market was 54 parking spaces. With the revisions of the existing site to accommodate the new Cinema building, and the addition of the needed ADA spaces, the site will have a new total of 60 spaces. Figure 17; Overall Site Plan details the Parking that will be available on-site

The proposed WSC facility will include four screens with a total of 360 seats (44/88/48/120). In addition to the theaters, an 18-seat café is proposed for inclusion in the new building. The Village of New Paltz requirement for parking for the theater is 1 parking space for every 6 seats, for a total of 60 spots. The requirement for the café is 1 space for every 3 seats, for a total of 6 spaces. Therefore the total parking spaces needed is 66. Although the proposal includes only 60 spaces, the location of the site is within easy walking distance to various Municipal lots within the Village. Figure 18 shows the locations of the nearby Municipal lots and Table 5 summarizes the number of spaces; distance/walking time from the site, and restrictions.

Page 65: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

64

Figure 17: Overall Site Plan

Page 66: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

65

Figure 18: Area Municipal Parking Lots

1

4

2

5

3

SITE

Page 67: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

66

Table 5: Summary of Area Municipal Parking Lots

Location Approx

Distance to Site

Approx Walking Time at 3 mph

# of Spaces

Metered Available

Site - - 60 - 1 Huguenot Street 1500 feet 5-6 min 25 - 6 am to 9

pm 2 Main St at North

Chestnut St 650 feet 2-3 min 20 2 hr limit 24 hours

3 North Chestnut St 900 feet 3-4 min 9 2 hr limit - Mon-Sat 9am to 6pm

24 hours

4 Plattekill Ave Lot 1300 feet 4-5 min 75 2 hr limit - Mon-Sat 9am to 6pm

24 hours

5 Plattekill Ave Village Hall

2000 feet 7-8 min 55 4 hr limit - Mon-Sat 9am to 6pm

6 am to 2 am

TOTAL SPACES 305

In addition to the Municipal lots, on-street metered parking is available along many of the streets within the Village. Figure 19 depicts the locations of on-street parking that were used in this inventory, and Table 6 summarizes the number of spaces; distance/walking time from the site, and restrictions. Also included is unmetered parking that is allowed on Saturday and Sunday on the north side of Hasbrouck Avenue. Figure 19/Table 6 does not include 16 metered spaces with a 1 hour limit between Route 32/Route 208 and Plattekill Avenue. These spaces are not included in the inventory because observations were that patrons of the businesses along that section of Main Street utilize these spaces to capacity.

This inventory of on-street parking is not all-inclusive within the Village. In addition to the areas mentioned there are several other Village Streets where parking is allowed. These were not included because they were either located at a less convenient location, or used primarily by residents on the streets.

Page 68: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

67

Figure 19: On-Street Parking

SITE

10

7

8

6

9

12

11

Page 69: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

68

Table 6: Summary of On-Street Parking Locations

Location Approx

Distance to Site

Approx Walking Time at 3 mph

# of Spaces

Metered Available

6 Main St between Wurts Ave and N & S Chestnut Street

400’-600’ 2-3 min 12 2 hr limit - Mon-Sat 9am to 6pm

24 hours

7 Route 208 (S Chestnut Street)

800’-900’ 3-4 min 4 2 hr limit - Mon-Sat 9am to 6pm

24 hours

8 Route 32 (N Chestnut Street)

800’-1300’ 3-5 min 17 2 hr limit - Mon-Sat 9am to 6pm

24 hours

9 Hasbrouck Ave – south side

1300’-1900’

5-8 min 14 4 hr limit - Mon-Sat 9am to 6pm

24 hours

10

Hasbrouck Ave – north side

1300’-1900’

5-8 min 14 No Saturday & Sunday

11

West side of Plattekill Ave

1400’-1500’

5-6 min 6 2 hr limit - Mon-Sat 9am to 6pm

24 hours

12

East side of Plattekill Ave 1200’-1500’

5-6 min 12 2 hr limit - Mon-Sat 9am to 6pm

24 hours

TOTAL SPACES 79

As part of this study observations were made as to the utilization of the inventoried lots and on-street parking. Table 7 shows average observations of usage and availability of these spaces.

Page 70: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

69

Table 7: Average Usage of Area Parking Lots & On-Street Parking

Lot/ Street

Location # of Spaces

Observed Utilization Friday & Saturday 6-8

Spaces Available Friday & Saturday 6-8

Observed Utilization Saturday 11:30-1:00

Spaces Available Saturday 11:30-1:00

Site 58 30% 40 95% 3 1 Huguenot Street 25 20% 20 40% 15 2 Main St at North

Chestnut St 20 80% 4 75% 5

3 North Chestnut St 9 80% 2 75% 2 4 Plattekill Ave Lot 75 65% 26 36% 48 5 Plattekill Ave

Village Hall 55 10% 50 10% 50

6 Main St between Wurts Ave and N & S Chestnut Street

12 80% 2 75% 3

7 Route 208 (S Chestnut Street)

4 90% 1 90% 1

8 Route 32 (N Chestnut Street)

17 80% 4 80% 4

9 Hasbrouck Ave – south side

14 0% Not allowed Friday 14-Saturday

0% 14

10 Hasbrouck Ave – north side

14 0% 14 0% 14

11 West side of Plattekill Ave

6 75% 1 75% 1

12 East side of Plattekill Ave

12 75% 3 75% 3

TOTALS 321 167 – Friday 181-Saturday

163

It could be argued that any one of these Municipal lots and on-street parking may not be desirable for individuals that are only attending the theater. However, the proposed Water Street Cinema will be located within a Village, which due to its many unique restaurants and shops is a destination itself. Consequently, many of the patrons attending the theatre will also be patronizing other businesses within the Village and do not necessarily need to park on-site. As shown above, adequate parking opportunities are available throughout the Village for this purpose.

Page 71: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

70

During the regular hours of the Water Street Market 9 AM to 819 PM the on-site parking lot is normally filled to near capacity. After 8 PM the only business that remains open is the Harvest Café. With a total of 97 seats, 66 of which are outside, the demand for parking spaces (as per the requirement of 1 space for every 3 seats) by patrons of the Café would be a maximum of 32 spaces with much less of a demand when outside seating is not practical. From this, it can be assumed that for those individuals who will only be attending the theater during evening hours, sufficient on-site parking will be available.

Patrons of only the theater during Saturday and Sunday afternoon shows will have a limited number of nearby municipal parking spaces. However, another option for those individuals is the use of privately owned lots as discussed in section 6.3.

7.3 Privately Owned Parking Lots

In addition to the municipal lots described in the previous section, there are two privately owned lots near the site where shared parking occurs. Both of these lots are located on Main Street to the east of Wurts Avenue. Wells Fargo Bank owns one lot, located at the intersection with Wurts Avenue, which is located on the opposite side of Main Street. Although signs are posted that indicate parking is for Wells Fargo customers only, the common practice is for individuals to use this lot to patronize other area businesses as well as the Wallkill Valley Rail Trail. The Banks hours of operation are Monday - Friday 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM and Saturday 9:00 AM -12:00 PM, closed on Sunday. Since the peak hours of operation of the proposed Water Street Cinema only overlap for a short time Saturday morning, this lot provides a viable alternative to the municipal parking discussed in the previous section. The lot does not have marked parking spaces but its dimensions are approximately 65' by 100', giving it a capacity of about 20-25 vehicles. Observations are that the during Saturday afternoons the lot is filled to about 40% capacity on average, leaving about 12 spaces available. During evening hours the lot is filled nearly to capacity with 3 or 4 open spaces.

The second privately owned lot is situated just to the east of the Wells Fargo parking lot. The dimensions of this lot are approximately 100' by 130' with a capacity for about 35 vehicles, and as with the Wells Fargo lot discussed previously, the spaces are not marked. Some of the spaces in this lot are reserved for the Rock and Snow customers only, which is a retail sports store located nearby. There are about 27 spots, which are not designated for use by any particular establishment. Observations of this lot revealed that is more heavily used than the Wells Fargo parking lot with only a few spaces available at any given time.

19 The stores open after 6 PM are: Himalayan Art, Fri/Sat to 7 PM; The Cheese Plate, Fri/Sat to 8 PM; Eden, Everyday to 7 PM; and Tech Smiths, M-F to 6:30 PM.

Page 72: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

71

The most likely use of the two parking lots mentioned above would be patrons of businesses located between Water Street and Route 32/Route 208. However, some of the businesses in this area have their own parking lots and are not competing for these spaces.

As shown by the WSC parking survey, more than half of the parking spaces that exist in the Village’s central business district were available at peak Friday evenings and on Saturday, both in the mid-day and in the evenings. The weekday evening hours occur after the municipal lot and on-street parking time restrictions, thus encouraging use as shared parking candidates. Village Zoning Code Section 212-44 incorporates a distance of 400 feet as a standard for dedicated parking but clearly is not consistent with the concept of shared parking and for purposes of this analysis is not used as a constraint.

Clearly, all of the available spaces are within the walking hypothesis envisioned in the shared parking concept although some of these spaces are located beyond the possible knowledge of first time visitors. Therefore, Water Street Cinema will be developing a marketing strategy that will educate its patrons and friends, to the availability and desirability of certain off-street parking lots and on-street parking opportunities, by including a map in its proposed advertising stratagem showing parking lots that are acceptable for after hours parking while attending a film at WSC. Water Street Cinema is committed to continuing to educate its patrons and friends of the parking opportunities in the Village’s central business district through regular and on-going features in its marketing and ticket venues.

And finally, consistent with the intent and recognition that this facility, the Water Street Cinema, has the potential to become a community asset in the same terms as the Upstate Films facility in Rhinebeck, it is reasonable to conclude that the entire New Paltz community, as represented by patrons and friends of WSC, should really be considered the applicant. By analogy, therefore, the entire community can be considered the beneficiary of the Water Street Cinema, and therefore its development and operation benefit the community.

Consistent with this potential community asset concept, the Wells Fargo Bank has indicated that its parking lot on Wurts Avenue (seldom used by banking customers as evidenced by this Study’s observations) will be graciously donated for use by WSC patrons through an agreement with the applicant. This agreement is presently well under development. This Bank lot can accommodate a minimum of 22 to 26 parking spaces. Noteworthy is the fact that the Bank closes at noon on Saturday. Not only is this Wurts Avenue lot convenient and available but also so is the Wells Fargo lot on the north side of Route 299, behind the bank building, which currently is used for other local services during non-banking hours. This is precisely the type of shared use that the shared parking concept envisioned within the planning process.

Page 73: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

72

As noted previously, a comparison of the proposed Water Street Cinema to the long operating Upstate Films20 facility in Rhinebeck has been utilized in this parking analysis. The reason is simple since the surrounding physical and cultural environment for both facilities are almost identical. Similar to Upstate, WSC will be located in a popular historic and artistic setting in a busy multi-faceted village atmosphere. Both facilities benefit and suffer from heavily traveled state roadway infrastructure, but at the same time have the advantage of multi-use, shared parking opportunities that exist all around their sites. Both Villages have specific zoning requirements for parking. The Village of Rhinebeck in 1997 recognized the value and logic associated with shared parking when the Planning Board allowed the construction of the second screen (additional 88 seats) for Upstate based upon a parking study which showed the very same results this Water Street Cinema parking analysis shows, that there is sufficient shared parking surrounding these “walkable”21 communities sufficient to sustain theater service.

Based upon the parking that is available in the area based upon this intensive parking review, it is reasonable to conclude that sufficient parking is available in the Village to accommodate the Water Street Cinema Films proposed development plans without causing any detrimental changes to the health, safety, and welfare of the Village.

20 Upstate Films also has a theater in Woodstock, NY, however, its Rhinebeck facility has operated since 1972 in the very center of the Village. It has only a 21-space parking lot for its two screens and 244 seats. It operates seven days a week, year round, with 700+ shows per year. 21 Walkable communities have density, mixed use, transit, short blocks, and desirable services that are symbiotic in nature. What makes a neighborhood walkable?

A center: Walkable neighborhoods have a center, whether it's a main street or a public space. People: Enough people for businesses to flourish and for public transit to run frequently. Mixed income, mixed use: Affordable housing located near businesses. Parks and public space: Plenty of public places to gather and play. Pedestrian design: Buildings are close to the street, parking lots are relegated to the back. Schools and workplaces: Close enough that most residents can walk from their homes. Complete streets: Streets designed for bicyclists, pedestrians, and transit.

Page 74: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

73

8.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

This Traffic Impact Study has analyzed the impact of traffic generation forecast for the proposed Water Street Cinema (WSC) project in relationship to the existing highway network in relationship to capacity, safety, and to parking supply and demand. The following findings are the result of this analysis and are meant to provide a foundation for the local decision making process.

The studied unsignalized and signalized intersections within the immediate area of the proposed WSC project are not significantly deteriorated by the application of the traffic generation from the proposed development. Therefore, the proposed Water Street Cinema project, as presented, shall have no significant impact on traffic operations on the adjacent roadway intersections as evaluated. It is clear that the Village of New Paltz is a destination for art, culture, entertainment, and general tourism, and therefore, at certain times of the year congestion is significant. The proposed Cinema will add to the allure of the Village but will do so, to a large part, as an added attraction for those visitors already enjoying the area’s highlights.

This Study also took a detailed look at the supply and demand of parking in the immediate area of the proposed Theater. Extensive data has been gathered and evaluated and more importantly, a similar facility located in a Village setting has been used as a real example of operational issues.

As noted previously, a comparison of the proposed Water Street Cinema to the long operating Upstate Films22 facility in Rhinebeck has been utilized in this parking analysis. The reason is simple since the surrounding physical and cultural environment for both facilities are almost identical. Similar to Upstate, WSC will be located in a popular historic and artistic setting in a busy multi-faceted village atmosphere. Both facilities benefit and suffer from heavily traveled state roadway infrastructure, but at the same time have the advantage of multi-use, shared parking opportunities that exist all around their sites. Both Villages have specific zoning requirements for parking. The Village of Rhinebeck in 1997 recognized the value and logic associated with shared parking when the Planning Board allowed the construction of the second screen (additional 88 seats) for Upstate based upon a parking study which showed the very same results this Water Street Cinema parking analysis shows, that there is sufficient shared parking surrounding these “walkable”23 communities sufficient to sustain theater service.

22 Upstate Films also has a theater in Woodstock, NY, however, its Rhinebeck facility has operated since 1972 in the very center of the Village. It has only a 21-space parking lot for its two screens and 244 seats. It operates seven days a week, year round, with 700+ shows per year. 23 Walkable communities have density, mixed use, transit, short blocks, and desirable services that are symbiotic in nature. What makes a neighborhood walkable?

A center: Walkable neighborhoods have a center, whether it's a main street or a public space.

Page 75: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

74

Based upon the parking that is available in the area based upon this intensive parking review, it is reasonable to conclude that sufficient parking is available in the Village of New Paltz to accommodate the Water Street Cinema proposed development plans without causing any detrimental changes to the health, safety, and welfare of the Village.

One reason that this Study concludes that parking will not be an issue is the fact that although a “walkable” community approach was not applied to the actual capacity analysis, the pedestrian accommodations within the Village will encourage pedestrian use and reduce vehicular circulation in and around the proposed Theater. The Village of New Paltz and NYSDOT have taken a number of measures to promote pedestrian safety and make the Village a pedestrian friendly area for the benefit of the entire community.

A safety analysis was conducted and resulted in no unusual patterns or number of incidents for this Village setting. Accidents typical of on-street parking (sideswipe) and periodic congestion (rear-end) were normal and are to be expected. The activity of the proposed Theater will not threaten this situation.

It is the conclusion of this detailed, extensive Study that the proposed Water Street Cinema will not have a negative impact on the operation of the Village’s infrastructure nor will it overtax its parking supply either on-site and off-site. Water Street Cinema therefore will be an asset to the walkable community goals of the Village of New Paltz, and will not hinder the health, safety, and welfare of its community.

People: Enough people for businesses to flourish and for public transit to run frequently. Mixed income, mixed use: Affordable housing located near businesses. Parks and public space: Plenty of public places to gather and play. Pedestrian design: Buildings are close to the street, parking lots are relegated to the back. Schools and workplaces: Close enough that most residents can walk from their homes. Complete streets: Streets designed for bicyclists, pedestrians, and transit.

Page 76: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

75

APPENDICES

Page 77: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

76

Appendix A: Level-of-Service Criteria

Page 78: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

77

Table 8: Signalized Level-of-Service LOS Control Delay Per Vehicle (seconds)

A Less than or equal to 10

B Greater than 10 and less than or equal to 20

C Greater than 20 and less than or equal to 35

D Greater than 35 and less than or equal to 55

E Greater than 55 and less than or equal to 80

F Greater than 80

Table 9: Unsignalized Level-of-Service

LOS Control Delay Per Vehicle (seconds)

A Less than or equal to 10

B Greater than 10 and less than or equal to 15

C Greater than 15 and less than or equal to 25

D Greater than 25 and less than or equal to 35

E Greater than 35 and less than or equal to 50

F Greater than 50

Page 79: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

78

Appendix B: Capacity Analyses

Page 80: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Water Street Cinema1: Rt. 299 & Huguenot St. Friday PM Existing

6/5/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 1

The Chazen Companies

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width (ft) 12 15 12 12 15 12 12 15 12 12 15 12Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% -1%Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Ped Bike FactorFrt 0.989 0.984 0.949 0.928Flt Protected 0.995 0.998 0.979 0.986Satd. Flow (prot) 0 2057 0 0 2052 0 0 1942 0 0 1922 0Flt Permitted 0.995 0.998 0.979 0.986Satd. Flow (perm) 0 2057 0 0 2052 0 0 1942 0 0 1922 0Headway Factor 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.99 0.88 0.99Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Link Distance (ft) 295 820 223 316Travel Time (s) 6.7 18.6 5.1 7.2Volume (vph) 49 380 33 14 387 55 27 10 25 26 16 49Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 2 2 1 1Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.86 0.75 0.70 0.81 0.81 0.75 0.63 0.78 0.72 0.67 0.72Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Adj. Flow (vph) 60 442 44 20 478 68 36 16 32 36 24 68Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 546 0 0 566 0 0 84 0 0 128 0Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop

Intersection SummaryArea Type: OtherControl Type: UnsignalizedIntersection Capacity Utilization 57.6% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 81: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Water Street Cinema6: Rt. 299 & Rt.208 Friday PM Existing

6/5/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 2

The Chazen Companies

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width (ft) 10 10 12 10 10 12 12 10 12 10 10 12Storage Length (ft) 300 0 0 0 0 0 300 0Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Leading Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Ped Bike Factor 0.97 0.99 0.96 0.98 0.91 0.92Frt 0.979 0.984 0.962 0.941Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.987 0.950Satd. Flow (prot) 1685 1698 0 1685 1703 0 0 1573 0 1668 1523 0Flt Permitted 0.386 0.358 0.712 0.421Satd. Flow (perm) 666 1698 0 612 1703 0 0 1103 0 739 1523 0Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes YesSatd. Flow (RTOR) 10 7 18 39Headway Factor 1.09 1.09 1.00 1.09 1.09 1.00 1.00 1.09 1.00 1.09 1.09 1.00Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Link Distance (ft) 803 424 395 239Travel Time (s) 18.3 9.6 9.0 5.4Volume (vph) 65 341 32 63 349 38 68 144 72 178 148 70Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 24 24 36 36 59 59 56 56Peak Hour Factor 0.81 0.90 0.53 0.66 0.96 0.86 0.77 0.90 0.75 0.81 0.88 0.65Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0%Adj. Flow (vph) 80 379 60 95 364 44 88 160 96 220 168 108Lane Group Flow (vph) 80 439 0 95 408 0 0 344 0 220 276 0Turn Type Perm Perm Perm pm+ptProtected Phases 2 6 8 7 4Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4Detector Phases 2 2 6 6 8 8 7 4Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 5.0Minimum Split (s) 21.0 21.0 21.5 21.5 21.0 21.0 9.0 21.0Total Split (s) 55.0 55.0 0.0 55.0 55.0 0.0 35.0 35.0 0.0 20.0 35.0 0.0Total Split (%) 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 31.8% 31.8% 0.0% 18.2% 31.8% 0.0%Maximum Green (s) 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 30.0 30.0 15.0 30.0Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.0All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.0Lead/Lag Lead Lead LagLead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes YesVehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Recall Mode Min Min Min Min Min Min Min MinWalk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Act Effct Green (s) 26.1 26.1 26.1 26.1 31.6 46.6 46.6Actuated g/C Ratio 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.39 0.58 0.58v/c Ratio 0.37 0.79 0.48 0.74 0.78 0.40 0.31

Page 82: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Water Street Cinema6: Rt. 299 & Rt.208 Friday PM Existing

6/5/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 3

The Chazen Companies

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRControl Delay 26.2 35.3 30.7 32.2 38.1 16.0 10.2Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 26.2 35.3 30.7 32.2 38.1 16.0 10.2LOS C D C C D B BApproach Delay 33.9 31.9 38.1 12.7Approach LOS C C D BQueue Length 50th (ft) 30 190 37 174 138 49 54Queue Length 95th (ft) 63 316 58 290 #381 105 134Internal Link Dist (ft) 723 344 315 159Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 300Base Capacity (vph) 324 830 298 831 442 619 930Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.25 0.53 0.32 0.49 0.78 0.36 0.30

Intersection SummaryArea Type: OtherCycle Length: 110Actuated Cycle Length: 80.8Natural Cycle: 60Control Type: Actuated-UncoordinatedMaximum v/c Ratio: 0.79Intersection Signal Delay: 28.5 Intersection LOS: CIntersection Capacity Utilization 72.9% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

Splits and Phases: 6: Rt. 299 & Rt.208

Page 83: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Water Street Cinema9: Rt. 299 & Wurts Ave. Friday PM Existing

6/5/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 4

The Chazen Companies

Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width (ft) 15 12 12 15 12 12Grade (%) 6% -1% -2%Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Ped Bike FactorFrt 0.993 0.910Flt Protected 0.998 0.984Satd. Flow (prot) 1812 0 0 2096 1718 0Flt Permitted 0.998 0.984Satd. Flow (perm) 1812 0 0 2096 1718 0Headway Factor 1.05 1.04 0.99 0.88 0.99 0.99Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30Link Distance (ft) 820 803 479Travel Time (s) 18.6 18.3 10.9Volume (vph) 383 13 19 456 10 13Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 8 40 40Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.54 0.79 0.86 0.83 0.54Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Parking (#/hr) 0 0Adj. Flow (vph) 416 24 24 530 12 24Lane Group Flow (vph) 440 0 0 554 36 0Sign Control Free Free Stop

Intersection SummaryArea Type: OtherControl Type: UnsignalizedIntersection Capacity Utilization 56.8% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 84: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Water Street Cinema1: Rt. 299 & Huguenot St. Friday PM Existing

6/5/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 1

The Chazen Companies

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% -1%Volume (veh/h) 49 380 33 14 387 55 27 10 25 26 16 49Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.86 0.75 0.70 0.81 0.81 0.75 0.63 0.78 0.72 0.67 0.72Hourly flow rate (vph) 60 442 44 20 478 68 36 16 32 36 24 68Pedestrians 2 2 1 1Lane Width (ft) 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft)pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 547 487 1218 1171 467 1178 1159 515vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 547 487 1218 1171 467 1178 1159 515tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 94 98 69 91 95 74 87 88cM capacity (veh/h) 1032 1085 118 179 598 140 182 562

Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 546 566 84 128Volume Left 60 20 36 36Volume Right 44 68 32 68cSH 1032 1085 188 251Volume to Capacity 0.06 0.02 0.45 0.51Queue Length 95th (ft) 5 1 52 66Control Delay (s) 1.6 0.5 38.9 33.3Lane LOS A A E DApproach Delay (s) 1.6 0.5 38.9 33.3Approach LOS E D

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 6.6Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.6% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 85: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Water Street Cinema9: Rt. 299 & Wurts Ave. Friday PM Existing

6/5/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 2

The Chazen Companies

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Free Free StopGrade 6% -1% -2%Volume (veh/h) 383 13 19 456 10 13Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.54 0.79 0.86 0.83 0.54Hourly flow rate (vph) 416 24 24 530 12 24Pedestrians 40 40 8Lane Width (ft) 15.0 15.0 12.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 4 4 1Right turn flare (veh)Median type NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 803pX, platoon unblocked 0.84vC, conflicting volume 448 1055 476vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 448 1065 476tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3p0 queue free % 98 94 96cM capacity (veh/h) 1115 195 564

Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1Volume Total 440 554 36Volume Left 0 24 12Volume Right 24 0 24cSH 1700 1115 346Volume to Capacity 0.26 0.02 0.10Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 2 9Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.6 16.6Lane LOS A CApproach Delay (s) 0.0 0.6 16.6Approach LOS C

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 0.9Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.8% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 86: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Water Street Cinema1: Rt. 299 & Huguenot St. Friday PM No-Build

6/5/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 1

The Chazen Companies

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width (ft) 12 15 12 12 15 12 12 15 12 12 15 12Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% -1%Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Ped Bike FactorFrt 0.989 0.984 0.949 0.928Flt Protected 0.995 0.998 0.979 0.986Satd. Flow (prot) 0 2057 0 0 2052 0 0 1942 0 0 1922 0Flt Permitted 0.995 0.998 0.979 0.986Satd. Flow (perm) 0 2057 0 0 2052 0 0 1942 0 0 1922 0Headway Factor 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.99 0.88 0.99Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Link Distance (ft) 295 820 223 316Travel Time (s) 6.7 18.6 5.1 7.2Volume (vph) 49 380 33 14 387 55 27 10 25 26 16 49Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 2 2 1 1Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.86 0.75 0.70 0.81 0.81 0.75 0.63 0.78 0.72 0.67 0.72Growth Factor 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104%Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Adj. Flow (vph) 62 460 46 21 497 71 37 17 33 38 25 71Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 568 0 0 589 0 0 87 0 0 134 0Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop

Intersection SummaryArea Type: OtherControl Type: UnsignalizedIntersection Capacity Utilization 59.6% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 87: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Water Street Cinema6: Rt. 299 & Rt.208 Friday PM No-Build

6/5/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 2

The Chazen Companies

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width (ft) 10 10 12 10 10 12 12 10 12 10 10 12Storage Length (ft) 300 0 0 0 0 0 300 0Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Leading Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Ped Bike Factor 0.97 0.99 0.98 0.91 0.92Frt 0.979 0.984 0.962 0.941Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.987 0.950Satd. Flow (prot) 1685 1697 0 1685 1703 0 0 1572 0 1668 1524 0Flt Permitted 0.372 0.342 0.687 0.412Satd. Flow (perm) 643 1697 0 606 1703 0 0 1065 0 723 1524 0Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes YesSatd. Flow (RTOR) 10 7 18 39Headway Factor 1.09 1.09 1.00 1.09 1.09 1.00 1.00 1.09 1.00 1.09 1.09 1.00Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Link Distance (ft) 803 424 395 239Travel Time (s) 18.3 9.6 9.0 5.4Volume (vph) 65 341 32 63 349 38 68 144 72 178 148 70Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 24 24 36 36 59 59 56 56Peak Hour Factor 0.81 0.90 0.53 0.66 0.96 0.86 0.77 0.90 0.75 0.81 0.88 0.65Growth Factor 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104%Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0%Adj. Flow (vph) 83 394 63 99 378 46 92 166 100 229 175 112Lane Group Flow (vph) 83 457 0 99 424 0 0 358 0 229 287 0Turn Type Perm Perm Perm pm+ptProtected Phases 2 6 8 7 4Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4Detector Phases 2 2 6 6 8 8 7 4Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 5.0Minimum Split (s) 21.0 21.0 21.5 21.5 21.0 21.0 9.0 21.0Total Split (s) 55.0 55.0 0.0 55.0 55.0 0.0 35.0 35.0 0.0 20.0 35.0 0.0Total Split (%) 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 31.8% 31.8% 0.0% 18.2% 31.8% 0.0%Maximum Green (s) 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 30.0 30.0 15.0 30.0Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.0All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.0Lead/Lag Lead Lead LagLead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes YesVehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Recall Mode Min Min Min Min Min Min Min MinWalk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Act Effct Green (s) 27.3 27.3 27.3 27.3 31.6 47.0 47.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.38 0.57 0.57

Page 88: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Water Street Cinema6: Rt. 299 & Rt.208 Friday PM No-Build

6/5/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 3

The Chazen Companies

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRv/c Ratio 0.39 0.80 0.49 0.75 0.85 0.42 0.32Control Delay 26.8 35.9 31.0 32.5 46.9 17.4 10.9Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 26.8 35.9 31.0 32.5 46.9 17.4 10.9LOS C D C C D B BApproach Delay 34.5 32.2 46.9 13.8Approach LOS C C D BQueue Length 50th (ft) 32 203 39 185 156 54 60Queue Length 95th (ft) 65 336 61 305 #428 115 148Internal Link Dist (ft) 723 344 315 159Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 300Base Capacity (vph) 311 826 293 828 420 604 918Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.27 0.55 0.34 0.51 0.85 0.38 0.31

Intersection SummaryArea Type: OtherCycle Length: 110Actuated Cycle Length: 82.5Natural Cycle: 55Control Type: Actuated-UncoordinatedMaximum v/c Ratio: 0.85Intersection Signal Delay: 30.7 Intersection LOS: CIntersection Capacity Utilization 74.9% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

Splits and Phases: 6: Rt. 299 & Rt.208

Page 89: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Water Street Cinema9: Rt. 299 & Wurts Ave. Friday PM No-Build

6/5/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 4

The Chazen Companies

Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width (ft) 15 12 12 15 12 12Grade (%) 6% -1% -2%Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Ped Bike FactorFrt 0.993 0.911Flt Protected 0.998 0.983Satd. Flow (prot) 1812 0 0 2096 1718 0Flt Permitted 0.998 0.983Satd. Flow (perm) 1812 0 0 2096 1718 0Headway Factor 1.05 1.04 0.99 0.88 0.99 0.99Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30Link Distance (ft) 820 803 479Travel Time (s) 18.6 18.3 10.9Volume (vph) 383 13 19 456 10 13Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 8 40 40Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.54 0.79 0.86 0.83 0.54Growth Factor 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104%Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Parking (#/hr) 0 0Adj. Flow (vph) 433 25 25 551 13 25Lane Group Flow (vph) 458 0 0 576 38 0Sign Control Free Free Stop

Intersection SummaryArea Type: OtherControl Type: UnsignalizedIntersection Capacity Utilization 58.4% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 90: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Water Street Cinema1: Rt. 299 & Huguenot St. Friday PM No-Build

6/5/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 1

The Chazen Companies

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% -1%Volume (veh/h) 49 380 33 14 387 55 27 10 25 26 16 49Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.86 0.75 0.70 0.81 0.81 0.75 0.63 0.78 0.72 0.67 0.72Hourly flow rate (vph) 62 460 46 21 497 71 37 17 33 38 25 71Pedestrians 2 2 1 1Lane Width (ft) 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft)pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 569 506 1267 1218 485 1225 1205 535vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 569 506 1267 1218 485 1225 1205 535tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 94 98 65 90 94 71 85 87cM capacity (veh/h) 1013 1068 106 167 584 128 170 547

Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 567 588 87 133Volume Left 62 21 37 38Volume Right 46 71 33 71cSH 1013 1068 172 234Volume to Capacity 0.06 0.02 0.51 0.57Queue Length 95th (ft) 5 1 62 79Control Delay (s) 1.6 0.5 45.7 38.8Lane LOS A A E EApproach Delay (s) 1.6 0.5 45.7 38.8Approach LOS E E

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 7.6Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.6% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 91: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Water Street Cinema9: Rt. 299 & Wurts Ave. Friday PM No-Build

6/5/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 2

The Chazen Companies

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Free Free StopGrade 6% -1% -2%Volume (veh/h) 383 13 19 456 10 13Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.54 0.79 0.86 0.83 0.54Hourly flow rate (vph) 433 25 25 551 13 25Pedestrians 40 40 8Lane Width (ft) 15.0 15.0 12.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 4 4 1Right turn flare (veh)Median type NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 803pX, platoon unblocked 0.83vC, conflicting volume 466 1095 493vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 466 1114 493tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3p0 queue free % 98 93 95cM capacity (veh/h) 1099 180 552

Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1Volume Total 458 576 38Volume Left 0 25 13Volume Right 25 0 25cSH 1700 1099 326Volume to Capacity 0.27 0.02 0.12Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 2 10Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.6 17.5Lane LOS A CApproach Delay (s) 0.0 0.6 17.5Approach LOS C

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 1.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.4% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 92: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Water Street Cinema1: Rt. 299 & Huguenot St. Friday PM Build

6/5/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 1

The Chazen Companies

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width (ft) 12 15 12 12 15 12 12 15 12 12 15 12Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% -1%Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Ped Bike FactorFrt 0.987 0.985 0.938 0.928Flt Protected 0.995 0.996 0.981 0.986Satd. Flow (prot) 0 2053 0 0 2050 0 0 1923 0 0 1922 0Flt Permitted 0.995 0.996 0.981 0.986Satd. Flow (perm) 0 2053 0 0 2050 0 0 1923 0 0 1922 0Headway Factor 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.99 0.88 0.99Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Link Distance (ft) 295 820 223 316Travel Time (s) 6.7 18.6 5.1 7.2Volume (vph) 49 380 41 35 402 57 30 10 38 26 16 49Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 2 2 1 1Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.86 0.75 0.70 0.81 0.81 0.75 0.63 0.78 0.72 0.67 0.72Growth Factor 104% 104% 100% 100% 104% 104% 100% 104% 100% 104% 104% 104%Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Adj. Flow (vph) 62 460 55 50 516 73 40 17 49 38 25 71Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 577 0 0 639 0 0 106 0 0 134 0Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop

Intersection SummaryArea Type: OtherControl Type: UnsignalizedIntersection Capacity Utilization 52.4% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 93: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Water Street Cinema6: Rt. 299 & Rt.208 Friday PM Build

6/5/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 2

The Chazen Companies

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width (ft) 10 10 12 10 10 12 12 10 12 10 10 12Storage Length (ft) 300 0 0 0 0 0 300 0Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Leading Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Ped Bike Factor 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.91 0.91Frt 0.977 0.984 0.964 0.937Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.986 0.950Satd. Flow (prot) 1685 1691 0 1685 1704 0 0 1577 0 1668 1506 0Flt Permitted 0.360 0.321 0.627 0.415Satd. Flow (perm) 623 1691 0 569 1704 0 0 975 0 729 1506 0Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes YesSatd. Flow (RTOR) 11 7 17 45Headway Factor 1.09 1.09 1.00 1.09 1.09 1.00 1.00 1.09 1.00 1.09 1.09 1.00Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Link Distance (ft) 803 424 395 239Travel Time (s) 18.3 9.6 9.0 5.4Volume (vph) 75 365 40 63 375 38 81 144 72 178 148 83Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 24 24 36 36 59 59 56 56Peak Hour Factor 0.81 0.90 0.53 0.66 0.96 0.86 0.77 0.90 0.75 0.81 0.88 0.65Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 104% 100% 104% 100% 104% 104% 104% 104% 100%Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0%Adj. Flow (vph) 93 406 75 99 391 46 105 166 100 229 175 128Lane Group Flow (vph) 93 481 0 99 437 0 0 371 0 229 303 0Turn Type Perm Perm Perm pm+ptProtected Phases 2 6 8 7 4Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4Detector Phases 2 2 6 6 8 8 7 4Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 5.0Minimum Split (s) 21.0 21.0 21.5 21.5 21.0 21.0 9.0 21.0Total Split (s) 55.0 55.0 0.0 55.0 55.0 0.0 35.0 35.0 0.0 20.0 35.0 0.0Total Split (%) 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 31.8% 31.8% 0.0% 18.2% 31.8% 0.0%Maximum Green (s) 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 30.0 30.0 15.0 30.0Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.0All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.0Lead/Lag Lead Lead LagLead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes YesVehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Recall Mode Min Min Min Min Min Min Min MinWalk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Act Effct Green (s) 28.8 28.8 28.8 28.8 31.7 46.8 46.8Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.38 0.56 0.56

Page 94: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Water Street Cinema6: Rt. 299 & Rt.208 Friday PM Build

6/5/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 3

The Chazen Companies

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRv/c Ratio 0.43 0.82 0.51 0.74 0.98 0.43 0.35Control Delay 27.8 36.2 31.4 31.6 71.6 18.5 11.7Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 27.8 36.2 31.4 31.6 71.6 18.5 11.7LOS C D C C E B BApproach Delay 34.9 31.6 71.6 14.6Approach LOS C C E BQueue Length 50th (ft) 36 217 40 192 180 57 67Queue Length 95th (ft) 73 354 61 313 #477 121 163Internal Link Dist (ft) 723 344 315 159Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 300Base Capacity (vph) 302 826 276 830 379 596 896Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.31 0.58 0.36 0.53 0.98 0.38 0.34

Intersection SummaryArea Type: OtherCycle Length: 110Actuated Cycle Length: 83.8Natural Cycle: 60Control Type: Actuated-UncoordinatedMaximum v/c Ratio: 0.98Intersection Signal Delay: 35.4 Intersection LOS: DIntersection Capacity Utilization 76.8% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

Splits and Phases: 6: Rt. 299 & Rt.208

Page 95: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Water Street Cinema9: Rt. 299 & Wurts Ave. Friday PM Build

6/5/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 4

The Chazen Companies

Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width (ft) 15 12 12 15 12 12Grade (%) 6% -1% -2%Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Ped Bike FactorFrt 0.992 0.894Flt Protected 0.998 0.989Satd. Flow (prot) 1810 0 0 2096 1697 0Flt Permitted 0.998 0.989Satd. Flow (perm) 1810 0 0 2096 1697 0Headway Factor 1.05 1.04 0.99 0.88 0.99 0.99Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30Link Distance (ft) 820 803 479Travel Time (s) 18.6 18.3 10.9Volume (vph) 410 14 19 494 10 26Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 8 40 40Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.54 0.79 0.86 0.83 0.54Growth Factor 100% 104% 104% 100% 104% 100%Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Parking (#/hr) 0 0Adj. Flow (vph) 446 27 25 574 13 48Lane Group Flow (vph) 473 0 0 599 61 0Sign Control Free Free Stop

Intersection SummaryArea Type: OtherControl Type: UnsignalizedIntersection Capacity Utilization 59.7% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 96: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Water Street Cinema1: Rt. 299 & Huguenot St. Friday PM Build

6/5/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 1

The Chazen Companies

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% -1%Volume (veh/h) 49 380 41 35 402 57 30 10 38 26 16 49Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.86 0.75 0.70 0.81 0.81 0.75 0.63 0.78 0.72 0.67 0.72Hourly flow rate (vph) 62 460 55 50 516 73 40 17 49 38 25 71Pedestrians 2 2 1 1Lane Width (ft) 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft)pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 590 515 1350 1302 490 1324 1293 556vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 590 515 1350 1302 490 1324 1293 556tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 94 95 55 89 92 63 83 87cM capacity (veh/h) 994 1060 89 145 581 103 146 533

Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 576 639 105 133Volume Left 62 50 40 38Volume Right 55 73 49 71cSH 994 1060 163 200Volume to Capacity 0.06 0.05 0.65 0.67Queue Length 95th (ft) 5 4 91 101Control Delay (s) 1.7 1.2 60.7 53.2Lane LOS A A F FApproach Delay (s) 1.7 1.2 60.7 53.2Approach LOS F F

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 10.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.4% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 97: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Water Street Cinema9: Rt. 299 & Wurts Ave. Friday PM Build

6/5/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 2

The Chazen Companies

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Free Free StopGrade 6% -1% -2%Volume (veh/h) 410 14 19 494 10 26Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.54 0.79 0.86 0.83 0.54Hourly flow rate (vph) 446 27 25 574 13 48Pedestrians 40 40 8Lane Width (ft) 15.0 15.0 12.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 4 4 1Right turn flare (veh)Median type NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 803pX, platoon unblocked 0.83vC, conflicting volume 481 1132 507vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 481 1158 507tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3p0 queue free % 98 93 91cM capacity (veh/h) 1085 169 542

Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1Volume Total 473 599 61Volume Left 0 25 13Volume Right 27 0 48cSH 1700 1085 373Volume to Capacity 0.28 0.02 0.16Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 2 14Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.6 16.5Lane LOS A CApproach Delay (s) 0.0 0.6 16.5Approach LOS C

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 1.2Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.7% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 98: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Water Street Cinema1: Rt. 299 & Huguenot St. Saturday AM Existing

5/24/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 1

The Chazen Companies

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width (ft) 12 15 12 12 15 12 12 15 12 12 15 12Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% -1%Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Ped Bike FactorFrt 0.982 0.986 0.939 0.907Flt Protected 0.994 0.995 0.978 0.992Satd. Flow (prot) 0 2037 0 0 2048 0 0 1919 0 0 1890 0Flt Permitted 0.994 0.995 0.978 0.992Satd. Flow (perm) 0 2037 0 0 2048 0 0 1919 0 0 1890 0Headway Factor 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.99 0.88 0.99Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Link Distance (ft) 295 820 223 316Travel Time (s) 6.7 18.6 5.1 7.2Volume (vph) 52 360 48 39 456 54 34 7 43 18 16 82Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 4 2 2 3 3 4 4Peak Hour Factor 0.81 0.92 0.67 0.65 0.93 0.84 0.65 0.58 0.83 0.75 0.67 0.76Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Adj. Flow (vph) 64 391 72 60 490 64 52 12 52 24 24 108Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 527 0 0 614 0 0 116 0 0 156 0Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop

Intersection SummaryArea Type: OtherControl Type: UnsignalizedIntersection Capacity Utilization 54.7% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 99: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Water Street Cinema6: Rt. 299 & Rt.208 Saturday AM Existing

5/24/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 2

The Chazen Companies

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width (ft) 10 10 12 10 10 12 12 10 12 10 10 12Storage Length (ft) 300 0 0 0 0 0 300 0Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Leading Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Ped Bike Factor 0.97 0.99 0.88 0.90 0.87Frt 0.977 0.988 0.962 0.934Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.990 0.950Satd. Flow (prot) 1668 1668 0 1685 1726 0 0 1528 0 1668 1427 0Flt Permitted 0.295 0.295 0.754 0.451Satd. Flow (perm) 518 1668 0 523 1726 0 0 1126 0 710 1427 0Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes YesSatd. Flow (RTOR) 11 5 18 49Headway Factor 1.09 1.09 1.00 1.09 1.09 1.00 1.00 1.09 1.00 1.09 1.09 1.00Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Link Distance (ft) 803 424 395 239Travel Time (s) 18.3 9.6 9.0 5.4Volume (vph) 66 362 41 73 432 28 52 133 71 174 150 102Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 47 47 50 50 96 96 81 81Peak Hour Factor 0.75 0.84 0.51 0.61 0.92 0.70 0.87 0.90 0.89 0.91 0.85 0.73Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1%Adj. Flow (vph) 88 431 80 120 470 40 60 148 80 191 176 140Lane Group Flow (vph) 88 511 0 120 510 0 0 288 0 191 316 0Turn Type Perm Perm Perm pm+ptProtected Phases 2 6 8 7 4Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4Detector Phases 2 2 6 6 8 8 7 4Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 5.0Minimum Split (s) 21.0 21.0 21.5 21.5 21.0 21.0 9.0 21.0Total Split (s) 55.0 55.0 0.0 55.0 55.0 0.0 35.0 35.0 0.0 20.0 35.0 0.0Total Split (%) 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 31.8% 31.8% 0.0% 18.2% 31.8% 0.0%Maximum Green (s) 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 30.0 30.0 15.0 30.0Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.0All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.0Lead/Lag Lead Lead LagLead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes YesVehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Recall Mode Min Min Min Min Min Min Min MinWalk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Act Effct Green (s) 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 24.1 37.4 37.4Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.32 0.50 0.50v/c Ratio 0.45 0.80 0.61 0.78 0.76 0.40 0.43

Page 100: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Water Street Cinema6: Rt. 299 & Rt.208 Saturday AM Existing

5/24/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 3

The Chazen Companies

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRControl Delay 26.4 30.9 34.1 29.4 38.9 19.9 14.1Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 26.4 30.9 34.1 29.4 38.9 19.9 14.1LOS C C C C D B BApproach Delay 30.2 30.3 38.9 16.3Approach LOS C C D BQueue Length 50th (ft) 31 210 45 209 108 46 71Queue Length 95th (ft) 61 317 62 350 #306 123 177Internal Link Dist (ft) 723 344 315 159Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 300Base Capacity (vph) 278 900 281 929 456 593 861Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.32 0.57 0.43 0.55 0.63 0.32 0.37

Intersection SummaryArea Type: OtherCycle Length: 110Actuated Cycle Length: 74.2Natural Cycle: 60Control Type: Actuated-UncoordinatedMaximum v/c Ratio: 0.80Intersection Signal Delay: 28.0 Intersection LOS: CIntersection Capacity Utilization 78.5% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

Splits and Phases: 6: Rt. 299 & Rt.208

Page 101: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Water Street Cinema9: Rt. 299 & Wurts Ave. Saturday AM Existing

5/24/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 4

The Chazen Companies

Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width (ft) 15 12 12 15 12 12Grade (%) 6% -1% -2%Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Ped Bike FactorFrt 0.991 0.906Flt Protected 0.997 0.985Satd. Flow (prot) 2009 0 0 2094 1713 0Flt Permitted 0.997 0.985Satd. Flow (perm) 2009 0 0 2094 1713 0Headway Factor 0.92 1.04 0.99 0.88 0.99 0.99Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30Link Distance (ft) 820 803 479Travel Time (s) 18.6 18.3 10.9Volume (vph) 423 26 27 524 9 21Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 13 93 93Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.81 0.68 0.94 0.75 0.75Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Adj. Flow (vph) 441 32 40 557 12 28Lane Group Flow (vph) 473 0 0 597 40 0Sign Control Free Free Stop

Intersection SummaryArea Type: OtherControl Type: UnsignalizedIntersection Capacity Utilization 69.2% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 102: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Water Street Cinema1: Rt. 299 & Huguenot St. Saturday AM Existing

5/24/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 1

The Chazen Companies

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% -1%Volume (veh/h) 52 360 48 39 456 54 34 7 43 18 16 82Peak Hour Factor 0.81 0.92 0.67 0.65 0.93 0.84 0.65 0.58 0.83 0.75 0.67 0.76Hourly flow rate (vph) 64 391 72 60 490 64 52 12 52 24 24 108Pedestrians 4 4 4 4Lane Width (ft) 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft)pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 559 467 1326 1238 435 1264 1242 530vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 559 467 1326 1238 435 1264 1242 530tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 94 95 39 92 92 79 85 80cM capacity (veh/h) 1018 1101 86 156 620 115 155 548

Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 527 615 116 156Volume Left 64 60 52 24Volume Right 72 64 52 108cSH 1018 1101 150 278Volume to Capacity 0.06 0.05 0.77 0.56Queue Length 95th (ft) 5 4 120 79Control Delay (s) 1.7 1.4 82.4 33.2Lane LOS A A F DApproach Delay (s) 1.7 1.4 82.4 33.2Approach LOS F D

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 11.7Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.7% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 103: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Water Street Cinema9: Rt. 299 & Wurts Ave. Saturday AM Existing

5/24/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 2

The Chazen Companies

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Free Free StopGrade 6% -1% -2%Volume (veh/h) 423 26 27 524 9 21Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.81 0.68 0.94 0.75 0.75Hourly flow rate (vph) 441 32 40 557 12 28Pedestrians 93 93 13Lane Width (ft) 15.0 15.0 12.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 10 10 1Right turn flare (veh)Median type NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 803pX, platoon unblocked 0.81vC, conflicting volume 486 1200 563vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 486 1245 563tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3p0 queue free % 96 91 94cM capacity (veh/h) 1076 136 473

Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1Volume Total 473 597 40Volume Left 0 40 12Volume Right 32 0 28cSH 1700 1076 272Volume to Capacity 0.28 0.04 0.15Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 3 13Control Delay (s) 0.0 1.0 20.5Lane LOS A CApproach Delay (s) 0.0 1.0 20.5Approach LOS C

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 1.3Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.2% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 104: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Water Street Cinema1: Rt. 299 & Huguenot St. Saturday AM No-Build

5/24/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 1

The Chazen Companies

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width (ft) 12 15 12 12 15 12 12 15 12 12 15 12Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% -1%Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Ped Bike FactorFrt 0.982 0.986 0.940 0.907Flt Protected 0.994 0.995 0.978 0.992Satd. Flow (prot) 0 2037 0 0 2048 0 0 1921 0 0 1890 0Flt Permitted 0.994 0.995 0.978 0.992Satd. Flow (perm) 0 2037 0 0 2048 0 0 1921 0 0 1890 0Headway Factor 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.99 0.88 0.99Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Link Distance (ft) 295 820 223 316Travel Time (s) 6.7 18.6 5.1 7.2Volume (vph) 52 360 48 39 456 54 34 7 43 18 16 82Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 4 2 2 3 3 4 4Peak Hour Factor 0.81 0.92 0.67 0.65 0.93 0.84 0.65 0.58 0.83 0.75 0.67 0.76Growth Factor 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104%Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Adj. Flow (vph) 67 407 75 62 510 67 54 13 54 25 25 112Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 549 0 0 639 0 0 121 0 0 162 0Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop

Intersection SummaryArea Type: OtherControl Type: UnsignalizedIntersection Capacity Utilization 56.6% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 105: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Water Street Cinema6: Rt. 299 & Rt.208 Saturday AM No-Build

5/24/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 2

The Chazen Companies

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width (ft) 10 10 12 10 10 12 12 10 12 10 10 12Storage Length (ft) 300 0 0 0 0 0 300 0Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Leading Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Ped Bike Factor 0.97 0.99 0.88 0.90 0.87Frt 0.976 0.988 0.963 0.934Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.990 0.950Satd. Flow (prot) 1668 1665 0 1685 1726 0 0 1529 0 1668 1428 0Flt Permitted 0.278 0.276 0.727 0.440Satd. Flow (perm) 488 1665 0 489 1726 0 0 1088 0 696 1428 0Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes YesSatd. Flow (RTOR) 11 5 18 48Headway Factor 1.09 1.09 1.00 1.09 1.09 1.00 1.00 1.09 1.00 1.09 1.09 1.00Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Link Distance (ft) 803 424 395 239Travel Time (s) 18.3 9.6 9.0 5.4Volume (vph) 66 362 41 73 432 28 52 133 71 174 150 102Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 47 47 50 50 96 96 81 81Peak Hour Factor 0.75 0.84 0.51 0.61 0.92 0.70 0.87 0.90 0.89 0.91 0.85 0.73Growth Factor 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104%Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1%Adj. Flow (vph) 92 448 84 124 488 42 62 154 83 199 184 145Lane Group Flow (vph) 92 532 0 124 530 0 0 299 0 199 329 0Turn Type Perm Perm Perm pm+ptProtected Phases 2 6 8 7 4Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4Detector Phases 2 2 6 6 8 8 7 4Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 5.0Minimum Split (s) 21.0 21.0 21.5 21.5 21.0 21.0 9.0 21.0Total Split (s) 55.0 55.0 0.0 55.0 55.0 0.0 35.0 35.0 0.0 20.0 35.0 0.0Total Split (%) 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 31.8% 31.8% 0.0% 18.2% 31.8% 0.0%Maximum Green (s) 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 30.0 30.0 15.0 30.0Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.0All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.0Lead/Lag Lead Lead LagLead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes YesVehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Recall Mode Min Min Min Min Min Min Min MinWalk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Act Effct Green (s) 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 27.4 41.1 41.1Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.34 0.51 0.51

Page 106: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Water Street Cinema6: Rt. 299 & Rt.208 Saturday AM No-Build

5/24/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 3

The Chazen Companies

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRv/c Ratio 0.49 0.82 0.66 0.79 0.78 0.43 0.44Control Delay 29.1 33.2 39.2 31.3 42.2 21.6 15.2Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 29.1 33.2 39.2 31.3 42.2 21.6 15.2LOS C C D C D C BApproach Delay 32.6 32.8 42.2 17.6Approach LOS C C D BQueue Length 50th (ft) 36 243 53 241 128 55 86Queue Length 95th (ft) 66 344 68 378 #353 135 197Internal Link Dist (ft) 723 344 315 159Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 300Base Capacity (vph) 252 865 252 893 422 569 834Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.37 0.62 0.49 0.59 0.71 0.35 0.39

Intersection SummaryArea Type: OtherCycle Length: 110Actuated Cycle Length: 80.7Natural Cycle: 60Control Type: Actuated-UncoordinatedMaximum v/c Ratio: 0.82Intersection Signal Delay: 30.3 Intersection LOS: CIntersection Capacity Utilization 80.6% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

Splits and Phases: 6: Rt. 299 & Rt.208

Page 107: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Water Street Cinema9: Rt. 299 & Wurts Ave. Saturday AM No-Build

5/24/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 4

The Chazen Companies

Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width (ft) 15 12 12 15 12 12Grade (%) 6% -1% -2%Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Ped Bike FactorFrt 0.991 0.905Flt Protected 0.997 0.986Satd. Flow (prot) 2009 0 0 2094 1712 0Flt Permitted 0.997 0.986Satd. Flow (perm) 2009 0 0 2094 1712 0Headway Factor 0.92 1.04 0.99 0.88 0.99 0.99Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30Link Distance (ft) 820 803 479Travel Time (s) 18.6 18.3 10.9Volume (vph) 423 26 27 524 9 21Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 13 93 93Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.81 0.68 0.94 0.75 0.75Growth Factor 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104%Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Adj. Flow (vph) 458 33 41 580 12 29Lane Group Flow (vph) 491 0 0 621 41 0Sign Control Free Free Stop

Intersection SummaryArea Type: OtherControl Type: UnsignalizedIntersection Capacity Utilization 71.2% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 108: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Water Street Cinema1: Rt. 299 & Huguenot St. Saturday AM No-Build

5/24/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 1

The Chazen Companies

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% -1%Volume (veh/h) 52 360 48 39 456 54 34 7 43 18 16 82Peak Hour Factor 0.81 0.92 0.67 0.65 0.93 0.84 0.65 0.58 0.83 0.75 0.67 0.76Hourly flow rate (vph) 67 407 75 62 510 67 54 13 54 25 25 112Pedestrians 4 4 4 4Lane Width (ft) 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft)pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 581 485 1379 1287 452 1314 1291 551vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 581 485 1379 1287 452 1314 1291 551tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 93 94 28 91 91 76 83 79cM capacity (veh/h) 999 1083 76 144 607 104 144 533

Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 548 639 121 162Volume Left 67 62 54 25Volume Right 75 67 54 112cSH 999 1083 135 260Volume to Capacity 0.07 0.06 0.89 0.62Queue Length 95th (ft) 5 5 148 95Control Delay (s) 1.8 1.5 114.2 39.3Lane LOS A A F EApproach Delay (s) 1.8 1.5 114.2 39.3Approach LOS F E

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 15.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.6% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 109: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Water Street Cinema9: Rt. 299 & Wurts Ave. Saturday AM No-Build

5/24/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 2

The Chazen Companies

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Free Free StopGrade 6% -1% -2%Volume (veh/h) 423 26 27 524 9 21Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.81 0.68 0.94 0.75 0.75Hourly flow rate (vph) 458 33 41 580 12 29Pedestrians 93 93 13Lane Width (ft) 15.0 15.0 12.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 10 10 1Right turn flare (veh)Median type NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 803pX, platoon unblocked 0.79vC, conflicting volume 505 1243 581vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 505 1307 581tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3p0 queue free % 96 90 94cM capacity (veh/h) 1059 121 462

Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1Volume Total 492 621 42Volume Left 0 41 12Volume Right 33 0 29cSH 1700 1059 251Volume to Capacity 0.29 0.04 0.17Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 3 15Control Delay (s) 0.0 1.0 22.2Lane LOS A CApproach Delay (s) 0.0 1.0 22.2Approach LOS C

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 1.4Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.2% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 110: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Water Street Cinema1: Rt. 299 & Huguenot St. Saturday PM Existing

5/24/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 1

The Chazen Companies

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width (ft) 12 15 12 12 15 12 12 15 12 12 15 12Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% -1%Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Ped Bike FactorFrt 0.986 0.981 0.939 0.959Flt Protected 0.991 0.994 0.980 0.976Satd. Flow (prot) 0 2042 0 0 2038 0 0 1923 0 0 1966 0Flt Permitted 0.991 0.994 0.980 0.976Satd. Flow (perm) 0 2042 0 0 2038 0 0 1923 0 0 1966 0Headway Factor 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.99 0.88 0.99Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Link Distance (ft) 295 820 223 316Travel Time (s) 6.7 18.6 5.1 7.2Volume (vph) 70 422 40 45 318 55 34 13 37 56 16 41Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2 12 12Peak Hour Factor 0.63 0.98 0.63 0.81 0.86 0.81 0.71 0.81 0.71 0.78 0.57 0.93Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Adj. Flow (vph) 111 431 63 56 370 68 48 16 52 72 28 44Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 605 0 0 494 0 0 116 0 0 144 0Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop

Intersection SummaryArea Type: OtherControl Type: UnsignalizedIntersection Capacity Utilization 57.7% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 111: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Water Street Cinema6: Rt. 299 & Rt.208 Saturday PM Existing

5/24/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 2

The Chazen Companies

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width (ft) 10 10 12 10 10 12 12 10 12 10 10 12Storage Length (ft) 300 0 0 0 0 0 300 0Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Leading Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Ped Bike Factor 0.90 0.97 0.95 0.77 0.82 0.78Frt 0.984 0.975 0.959 0.934Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.988 0.950Satd. Flow (prot) 1685 1688 0 1685 1645 0 0 1410 0 1668 1281 0Flt Permitted 0.384 0.282 0.875 0.459Satd. Flow (perm) 616 1688 0 500 1645 0 0 1145 0 658 1281 0Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes YesSatd. Flow (RTOR) 7 12 20 48Headway Factor 1.09 1.09 1.00 1.09 1.09 1.00 1.00 1.09 1.00 1.09 1.09 1.00Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Link Distance (ft) 803 424 395 239Travel Time (s) 18.3 9.6 9.0 5.4Volume (vph) 65 428 46 69 316 40 54 99 70 143 102 72Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 85 85 81 81 171 171 144 144Peak Hour Factor 0.63 0.91 0.82 0.82 0.92 0.59 0.79 0.75 0.80 0.97 0.91 0.82Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 0%Adj. Flow (vph) 103 470 56 84 343 68 68 132 88 147 112 88Lane Group Flow (vph) 103 526 0 84 411 0 0 288 0 147 200 0Turn Type Perm Perm Perm pm+ptProtected Phases 2 6 8 7 4Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4Detector Phases 2 2 6 6 8 8 7 4Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 5.0Minimum Split (s) 21.0 21.0 21.5 21.5 21.0 21.0 9.0 21.0Total Split (s) 55.0 55.0 0.0 55.0 55.0 0.0 35.0 35.0 0.0 20.0 35.0 0.0Total Split (%) 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 31.8% 31.8% 0.0% 18.2% 31.8% 0.0%Maximum Green (s) 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 30.0 30.0 15.0 30.0Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.0All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.0Lead/Lag Lead Lead LagLead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes YesVehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Recall Mode Min Min Min Min Min Min Min MinWalk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Act Effct Green (s) 28.5 28.5 28.5 28.5 23.5 37.0 37.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.32 0.50 0.50v/c Ratio 0.44 0.81 0.44 0.64 0.77 0.33 0.30

Page 112: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Water Street Cinema6: Rt. 299 & Rt.208 Saturday PM Existing

5/24/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 3

The Chazen Companies

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRControl Delay 24.6 31.2 26.3 23.7 39.6 18.8 12.0Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 24.6 31.2 26.3 23.7 39.6 18.8 12.0LOS C C C C D B BApproach Delay 30.1 24.1 39.6 14.9Approach LOS C C D BQueue Length 50th (ft) 35 213 29 150 109 36 38Queue Length 95th (ft) 55 379 68 273 207 96 113Internal Link Dist (ft) 723 344 315 159Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 300Base Capacity (vph) 332 913 270 893 461 572 771Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.31 0.58 0.31 0.46 0.62 0.26 0.26

Intersection SummaryArea Type: OtherCycle Length: 110Actuated Cycle Length: 74.4Natural Cycle: 60Control Type: Actuated-UncoordinatedMaximum v/c Ratio: 0.81Intersection Signal Delay: 27.0 Intersection LOS: CIntersection Capacity Utilization 75.6% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15

Splits and Phases: 6: Rt. 299 & Rt.208

Page 113: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Water Street Cinema9: Rt. 299 & Wurts Ave. Saturday PM Existing

5/24/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 4

The Chazen Companies

Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width (ft) 15 12 12 15 12 12Grade (%) 6% -1% -2%Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Ped Bike FactorFrt 0.994 0.890Flt Protected 0.995 0.991Satd. Flow (prot) 2015 0 0 2090 1693 0Flt Permitted 0.995 0.991Satd. Flow (perm) 2015 0 0 2090 1693 0Headway Factor 0.92 1.04 0.99 0.88 0.99 0.99Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30Link Distance (ft) 820 803 479Travel Time (s) 18.6 18.3 10.9Volume (vph) 495 17 33 375 4 24Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 17 182 182Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.71 0.75 0.93 0.50 0.67Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Adj. Flow (vph) 516 24 44 403 8 36Lane Group Flow (vph) 540 0 0 447 44 0Sign Control Free Free Stop

Intersection SummaryArea Type: OtherControl Type: UnsignalizedIntersection Capacity Utilization 67.0% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 114: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Water Street Cinema1: Rt. 299 & Huguenot St. Saturday PM Existing

5/24/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 1

The Chazen Companies

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% -1%Volume (veh/h) 70 422 40 45 318 55 34 13 37 56 16 41Peak Hour Factor 0.63 0.98 0.63 0.81 0.86 0.81 0.71 0.81 0.71 0.78 0.57 0.93Hourly flow rate (vph) 111 431 63 56 370 68 48 16 52 72 28 44Pedestrians 12 12 2 2Lane Width (ft) 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 1 1 0 0Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft)pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 440 496 1272 1237 476 1274 1235 418vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 440 496 1272 1237 476 1274 1235 418tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 90 95 53 89 91 33 81 93cM capacity (veh/h) 1129 1076 102 151 584 107 152 630

Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 605 493 116 144Volume Left 111 56 48 72Volume Right 63 68 52 44cSH 1129 1076 175 155Volume to Capacity 0.10 0.05 0.66 0.93Queue Length 95th (ft) 8 4 97 167Control Delay (s) 2.5 1.5 59.1 112.0Lane LOS A A F FApproach Delay (s) 2.5 1.5 59.1 112.0Approach LOS F F

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 18.6Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.7% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 115: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Water Street Cinema9: Rt. 299 & Wurts Ave. Saturday PM Existing

5/24/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 2

The Chazen Companies

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Free Free StopGrade 6% -1% -2%Volume (veh/h) 495 17 33 375 4 24Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.71 0.75 0.93 0.50 0.67Hourly flow rate (vph) 516 24 44 403 8 36Pedestrians 182 182 17Lane Width (ft) 15.0 15.0 12.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 19 19 1Right turn flare (veh)Median type NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 803pX, platoon unblocked 0.94vC, conflicting volume 557 1218 727vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 557 1231 727tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3p0 queue free % 96 94 90cM capacity (veh/h) 1010 143 342

Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1Volume Total 540 447 44Volume Left 0 44 8Volume Right 24 0 36cSH 1700 1010 273Volume to Capacity 0.32 0.04 0.16Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 3 14Control Delay (s) 0.0 1.3 20.7Lane LOS A CApproach Delay (s) 0.0 1.3 20.7Approach LOS C

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 1.4Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.0% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 116: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Water Street Cinema1: Rt. 299 & Huguenot St. Saturday PM No-Build

5/24/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 1

The Chazen Companies

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width (ft) 12 15 12 12 15 12 12 15 12 12 15 12Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% -1%Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Ped Bike FactorFrt 0.986 0.981 0.940 0.959Flt Protected 0.991 0.994 0.980 0.976Satd. Flow (prot) 0 2042 0 0 2038 0 0 1925 0 0 1966 0Flt Permitted 0.991 0.994 0.980 0.976Satd. Flow (perm) 0 2042 0 0 2038 0 0 1925 0 0 1966 0Headway Factor 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.99 0.88 0.99Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Link Distance (ft) 295 820 223 316Travel Time (s) 6.7 18.6 5.1 7.2Volume (vph) 70 422 40 45 318 55 34 13 37 56 16 41Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2 12 12Peak Hour Factor 0.63 0.98 0.63 0.81 0.86 0.81 0.71 0.81 0.71 0.78 0.57 0.93Growth Factor 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104%Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Adj. Flow (vph) 116 448 66 58 385 71 50 17 54 75 29 46Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 630 0 0 514 0 0 121 0 0 150 0Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop

Intersection SummaryArea Type: OtherControl Type: UnsignalizedIntersection Capacity Utilization 59.5% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 117: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Water Street Cinema6: Rt. 299 & Rt.208 Saturday PM No-Build

5/24/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 2

The Chazen Companies

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width (ft) 10 10 12 10 10 12 12 10 12 10 10 12Storage Length (ft) 300 0 0 0 0 0 300 0Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Leading Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Ped Bike Factor 0.91 0.97 0.95 0.77 0.82 0.78Frt 0.984 0.975 0.959 0.934Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.988 0.950Satd. Flow (prot) 1685 1688 0 1685 1645 0 0 1411 0 1668 1283 0Flt Permitted 0.368 0.264 0.863 0.450Satd. Flow (perm) 595 1688 0 468 1645 0 0 1132 0 651 1283 0Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes YesSatd. Flow (RTOR) 7 12 20 47Headway Factor 1.09 1.09 1.00 1.09 1.09 1.00 1.00 1.09 1.00 1.09 1.09 1.00Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Link Distance (ft) 803 424 395 239Travel Time (s) 18.3 9.6 9.0 5.4Volume (vph) 65 428 46 69 316 40 54 99 70 143 102 72Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 85 85 81 81 171 171 144 144Peak Hour Factor 0.63 0.91 0.82 0.82 0.92 0.59 0.79 0.75 0.80 0.97 0.91 0.82Growth Factor 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104%Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 0%Adj. Flow (vph) 107 489 58 88 357 71 71 137 91 153 117 91Lane Group Flow (vph) 107 547 0 88 428 0 0 299 0 153 208 0Turn Type Perm Perm Perm pm+ptProtected Phases 2 6 8 7 4Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4Detector Phases 2 2 6 6 8 8 7 4Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 5.0Minimum Split (s) 21.0 21.0 21.5 21.5 21.0 21.0 9.0 21.0Total Split (s) 55.0 55.0 0.0 55.0 55.0 0.0 35.0 35.0 0.0 20.0 35.0 0.0Total Split (%) 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 31.8% 31.8% 0.0% 18.2% 31.8% 0.0%Maximum Green (s) 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 30.0 30.0 15.0 30.0Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.0All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.0Lead/Lag Lead Lead LagLead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes YesVehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Recall Mode Min Min Min Min Min Min Min MinWalk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Act Effct Green (s) 30.8 30.8 30.8 30.8 25.6 39.3 39.3Actuated g/C Ratio 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.32 0.50 0.50

Page 118: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Water Street Cinema6: Rt. 299 & Rt.208 Saturday PM No-Build

5/24/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 3

The Chazen Companies

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRv/c Ratio 0.46 0.82 0.48 0.66 0.78 0.34 0.31Control Delay 25.9 32.8 28.8 24.6 41.9 20.2 12.9Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 25.9 32.8 28.8 24.6 41.9 20.2 12.9LOS C C C C D C BApproach Delay 31.7 25.3 41.9 16.0Approach LOS C C D BQueue Length 50th (ft) 41 252 34 177 127 42 46Queue Length 95th (ft) 57 401 73 287 #229 104 124Internal Link Dist (ft) 723 344 315 159Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 300Base Capacity (vph) 313 891 246 871 443 555 753Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.34 0.61 0.36 0.49 0.67 0.28 0.28

Intersection SummaryArea Type: OtherCycle Length: 110Actuated Cycle Length: 78.9Natural Cycle: 60Control Type: Actuated-UncoordinatedMaximum v/c Ratio: 0.82Intersection Signal Delay: 28.5 Intersection LOS: CIntersection Capacity Utilization 77.2% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

Splits and Phases: 6: Rt. 299 & Rt.208

Page 119: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Water Street Cinema9: Rt. 299 & Wurts Ave. Saturday PM No-Build

5/24/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 4

The Chazen Companies

Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width (ft) 15 12 12 15 12 12Grade (%) 6% -1% -2%Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Ped Bike FactorFrt 0.994 0.889Flt Protected 0.995 0.991Satd. Flow (prot) 2015 0 0 2090 1691 0Flt Permitted 0.995 0.991Satd. Flow (perm) 2015 0 0 2090 1691 0Headway Factor 0.92 1.04 0.99 0.88 0.99 0.99Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30Link Distance (ft) 820 803 479Travel Time (s) 18.6 18.3 10.9Volume (vph) 495 17 33 375 4 24Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 17 182 182Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.71 0.75 0.93 0.50 0.67Growth Factor 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104%Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Adj. Flow (vph) 536 25 46 419 8 37Lane Group Flow (vph) 561 0 0 465 45 0Sign Control Free Free Stop

Intersection SummaryArea Type: OtherControl Type: UnsignalizedIntersection Capacity Utilization 68.9% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 120: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Water Street Cinema1: Rt. 299 & Huguenot St. Saturday PM No-Build

5/24/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 1

The Chazen Companies

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% -1%Volume (veh/h) 70 422 40 45 318 55 34 13 37 56 16 41Peak Hour Factor 0.63 0.98 0.63 0.81 0.86 0.81 0.71 0.81 0.71 0.78 0.57 0.93Hourly flow rate (vph) 116 448 66 58 385 71 50 17 54 75 29 46Pedestrians 12 12 2 2Lane Width (ft) 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 1 1 0 0Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft)pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 457 516 1322 1287 495 1324 1284 434vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 457 516 1322 1287 495 1324 1284 434tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 90 95 45 88 90 22 79 93cM capacity (veh/h) 1112 1058 91 140 570 96 140 617

Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 629 513 121 150Volume Left 116 58 50 75Volume Right 66 71 54 46cSH 1112 1058 159 141Volume to Capacity 0.10 0.05 0.76 1.06Queue Length 95th (ft) 9 4 119 201Control Delay (s) 2.6 1.5 76.9 154.8Lane LOS A A F FApproach Delay (s) 2.6 1.5 76.9 154.8Approach LOS F F

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 24.7Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.5% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 121: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Water Street Cinema9: Rt. 299 & Wurts Ave. Saturday PM No-Build

5/24/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 2

The Chazen Companies

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Free Free StopGrade 6% -1% -2%Volume (veh/h) 495 17 33 375 4 24Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.71 0.75 0.93 0.50 0.67Hourly flow rate (vph) 536 25 46 419 8 37Pedestrians 182 182 17Lane Width (ft) 15.0 15.0 12.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 19 19 1Right turn flare (veh)Median type NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 803pX, platoon unblocked 0.92vC, conflicting volume 578 1259 748vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 578 1280 748tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3p0 queue free % 95 94 89cM capacity (veh/h) 991 130 332

Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1Volume Total 561 465 46Volume Left 0 46 8Volume Right 25 0 37cSH 1700 991 259Volume to Capacity 0.33 0.05 0.18Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 4 16Control Delay (s) 0.0 1.4 21.9Lane LOS A CApproach Delay (s) 0.0 1.4 21.9Approach LOS C

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 1.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.9% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 122: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Water Street Cinema1: Rt. 299 & Huguenot St. Saturday PM Build

6/5/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 1

The Chazen Companies

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width (ft) 12 15 12 12 15 12 12 15 12 12 15 12Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% -1%Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Ped Bike FactorFrt 0.984 0.982 0.937 0.959Flt Protected 0.991 0.993 0.980 0.976Satd. Flow (prot) 0 2038 0 0 2038 0 0 1919 0 0 1966 0Flt Permitted 0.991 0.993 0.980 0.976Satd. Flow (perm) 0 2038 0 0 2038 0 0 1919 0 0 1966 0Headway Factor 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.99 0.88 0.99Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Link Distance (ft) 295 820 223 316Travel Time (s) 6.7 18.6 5.1 7.2Volume (vph) 70 422 49 61 318 55 37 13 43 56 16 41Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2 12 12Peak Hour Factor 0.63 0.98 0.63 0.81 0.86 0.81 0.71 0.81 0.71 0.78 0.57 0.93Growth Factor 104% 104% 100% 100% 104% 104% 100% 104% 100% 104% 104% 104%Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Adj. Flow (vph) 116 448 78 75 385 71 52 17 61 75 29 46Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 642 0 0 531 0 0 130 0 0 150 0Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop

Intersection SummaryArea Type: OtherControl Type: UnsignalizedIntersection Capacity Utilization 57.4% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 123: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Water Street Cinema6: Rt. 299 & Rt.208 Saturday PM Build

6/5/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 2

The Chazen Companies

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width (ft) 10 10 12 10 10 12 12 10 12 10 10 12Storage Length (ft) 300 0 0 0 0 0 300 0Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Leading Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Ped Bike Factor 0.92 0.97 0.95 0.77 0.83 0.76Frt 0.983 0.976 0.961 0.929Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.986 0.950Satd. Flow (prot) 1685 1684 0 1685 1650 0 0 1424 0 1668 1245 0Flt Permitted 0.352 0.250 0.786 0.450Satd. Flow (perm) 573 1684 0 443 1650 0 0 1033 0 660 1245 0Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes YesSatd. Flow (RTOR) 8 12 19 55Headway Factor 1.09 1.09 1.00 1.09 1.09 1.00 1.00 1.09 1.00 1.09 1.09 1.00Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Link Distance (ft) 803 424 395 239Travel Time (s) 18.3 9.6 9.0 5.4Volume (vph) 71 456 51 69 345 40 68 99 70 143 102 87Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 85 85 81 81 171 171 144 144Peak Hour Factor 0.63 0.91 0.82 0.82 0.92 0.59 0.79 0.75 0.80 0.97 0.91 0.82Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 104% 100% 104% 100% 104% 104% 104% 104% 100%Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 0%Adj. Flow (vph) 113 501 62 88 375 71 86 137 91 153 117 106Lane Group Flow (vph) 113 563 0 88 446 0 0 314 0 153 223 0Turn Type Perm Perm Perm pm+ptProtected Phases 2 6 8 7 4Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4Detector Phases 2 2 6 6 8 8 7 4Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 5.0Minimum Split (s) 21.0 21.0 21.5 21.5 21.0 21.0 9.0 21.0Total Split (s) 55.0 55.0 0.0 55.0 55.0 0.0 35.0 35.0 0.0 20.0 35.0 0.0Total Split (%) 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 31.8% 31.8% 0.0% 18.2% 31.8% 0.0%Maximum Green (s) 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 30.0 30.0 15.0 30.0Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.0All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.0Lead/Lag Lead Lead LagLead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes YesVehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Recall Mode Min Min Min Min Min Min Min MinWalk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Act Effct Green (s) 34.2 34.2 34.2 34.2 31.6 44.7 44.7Actuated g/C Ratio 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.36 0.51 0.51

Page 124: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Water Street Cinema6: Rt. 299 & Rt.208 Saturday PM Build

6/5/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 3

The Chazen Companies

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRv/c Ratio 0.50 0.84 0.51 0.68 0.81 0.35 0.33Control Delay 27.8 35.7 30.5 26.4 45.3 20.3 13.1Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 27.8 35.7 30.5 26.4 45.3 20.3 13.1LOS C D C C D C BApproach Delay 34.4 27.1 45.3 16.0Approach LOS C C D BQueue Length 50th (ft) 45 264 35 188 144 43 50Queue Length 95th (ft) 59 410 73 297 #279 106 135Internal Link Dist (ft) 723 344 315 159Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 300Base Capacity (vph) 284 838 219 823 387 537 709Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.40 0.67 0.40 0.54 0.81 0.28 0.31

Intersection SummaryArea Type: OtherCycle Length: 110Actuated Cycle Length: 87Natural Cycle: 60Control Type: Actuated-UncoordinatedMaximum v/c Ratio: 0.84Intersection Signal Delay: 30.5 Intersection LOS: CIntersection Capacity Utilization 79.2% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

Splits and Phases: 6: Rt. 299 & Rt.208

Page 125: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Water Street Cinema9: Rt. 299 & Wurts Ave. Saturday PM Build

6/5/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 4

The Chazen Companies

Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width (ft) 15 12 12 15 12 12Grade (%) 6% -1% -2%Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Ped Bike FactorFrt 0.994 0.882Flt Protected 0.992 0.994Satd. Flow (prot) 2015 0 0 2084 1682 0Flt Permitted 0.992 0.994Satd. Flow (perm) 2015 0 0 2084 1682 0Headway Factor 0.92 1.04 0.99 0.88 0.99 0.99Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30Link Distance (ft) 820 803 479Travel Time (s) 18.6 18.3 10.9Volume (vph) 520 17 60 404 4 37Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 17 182 182Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.71 0.75 0.93 0.50 0.67Growth Factor 100% 104% 100% 100% 104% 100%Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Adj. Flow (vph) 542 25 80 434 8 55Lane Group Flow (vph) 567 0 0 514 63 0Sign Control Free Free Stop

Intersection SummaryArea Type: OtherControl Type: UnsignalizedIntersection Capacity Utilization 76.4% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 126: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Water Street Cinema1: Rt. 299 & Huguenot St. Saturday PM Build

6/5/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 1

The Chazen Companies

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% -1%Volume (veh/h) 70 422 49 61 318 55 37 13 43 56 16 41Peak Hour Factor 0.63 0.98 0.63 0.81 0.86 0.81 0.71 0.81 0.71 0.78 0.57 0.93Hourly flow rate (vph) 116 448 78 75 385 71 52 17 61 75 29 46Pedestrians 12 12 2 2Lane Width (ft) 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 1 1 0 0Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft)pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 457 528 1363 1328 501 1371 1331 434vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 457 528 1363 1328 501 1371 1331 434tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 90 93 37 87 89 13 77 93cM capacity (veh/h) 1112 1047 83 130 566 86 129 617

Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 641 530 129 150Volume Left 116 75 52 75Volume Right 78 71 61 46cSH 1112 1047 150 128Volume to Capacity 0.10 0.07 0.86 1.17Queue Length 95th (ft) 9 6 145 224Control Delay (s) 2.6 2.0 99.6 197.8Lane LOS A A F FApproach Delay (s) 2.6 2.0 99.6 197.8Approach LOS F F

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 31.2Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.4% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 127: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Water Street Cinema9: Rt. 299 & Wurts Ave. Saturday PM Build

6/5/2012 Synchro 6 ReportPage 2

The Chazen Companies

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Free Free StopGrade 6% -1% -2%Volume (veh/h) 520 17 60 404 4 37Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.71 0.75 0.93 0.50 0.67Hourly flow rate (vph) 542 25 80 434 8 55Pedestrians 182 182 17Lane Width (ft) 15.0 15.0 12.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 19 19 1Right turn flare (veh)Median type NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 803pX, platoon unblocked 0.88vC, conflicting volume 584 1348 753vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 584 1393 753tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3p0 queue free % 92 92 83cM capacity (veh/h) 987 102 330

Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1Volume Total 567 514 64Volume Left 0 80 8Volume Right 25 0 55cSH 1700 987 256Volume to Capacity 0.33 0.08 0.25Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 7 24Control Delay (s) 0.0 2.2 23.7Lane LOS A CApproach Delay (s) 0.0 2.2 23.7Approach LOS C

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 2.3Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.4% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 128: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

79

Appendix C: Manual Counts

Page 129: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

File Name : Rte 299 at Rtes 32 & 208 - Saturday AM existingSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 5/12/2012Page No : 1

Location Rte 299 @ Routes 32 & 208Observer JGWeather Clear and DryScenario AM Existing - Saturday

Groups Printed- Passenger Vehicles - Trucks - BusesROUTE 32From North

ROUTE 299 (MAIN STREET)From East

ROUTE 208From South

ROUTE 299 (MAIN STREET)From West

Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total11:30 AM 24 34 43 27 128 10 107 21 1 139 24 32 13 5 74 21 101 16 8 146 48711:45 AM 32 36 45 27 140 3 92 21 10 126 12 42 9 17 80 11 79 17 4 111 457

Total 56 70 88 54 268 13 199 42 11 265 36 74 22 22 154 32 180 33 12 257 944

12:00 PM 18 44 48 18 128 10 98 30 13 151 17 36 15 20 88 9 107 17 12 145 51212:15 PM 35 42 43 22 142 6 103 10 7 126 15 35 13 18 81 6 80 16 15 117 46612:30 PM 25 32 42 21 120 6 117 12 16 151 20 25 9 23 77 6 108 11 7 132 48012:45 PM 24 32 41 20 117 6 114 21 14 155 19 37 15 35 106 20 67 22 13 122 500

Total 102 150 174 81 507 28 432 73 50 583 71 133 52 96 352 41 362 66 47 516 1958

01:00 PM 26 23 36 29 114 6 100 8 18 132 19 34 12 27 92 6 80 16 14 116 45401:15 PM 18 24 27 16 85 9 133 14 24 180 18 28 13 28 87 0 106 17 17 140 492

Grand Total 202 267 325 180 974 56 864 137 103 1160 144 269 99 173 685 79 728 132 90 1029 3848Apprch % 20.7 27.4 33.4 18.5 4.8 74.5 11.8 8.9 21 39.3 14.5 25.3 7.7 70.7 12.8 8.7

Total % 5.2 6.9 8.4 4.7 25.3 1.5 22.5 3.6 2.7 30.1 3.7 7 2.6 4.5 17.8 2.1 18.9 3.4 2.3 26.7Passenger Vehicles 201 265 322 180 968 56 862 137 103 1158 144 267 99 173 683 78 726 131 90 1025 3834

% Passenger Vehicles 99.5 99.3 99.1 100 99.4 100 99.8 100 100 99.8 100 99.3 100 100 99.7 98.7 99.7 99.2 100 99.6 99.6Trucks 1 2 1 0 4 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 4 11

% Trucks 0.5 0.7 0.3 0 0.4 0 0.2 0 0 0.2 0 0.4 0 0 0.1 1.3 0.3 0.8 0 0.4 0.3Buses 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3

% Buses 0 0 0.6 0 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0.1

FitzPatrick Engineering, LLCTraffic and Safety Consultants

26 Julia DriveHyde Park, New York 12538

Page 130: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

File Name : Rte 299 at Rtes 32 & 208 - Saturday AM existingSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 5/12/2012Page No : 2

Location Rte 299 @ Routes 32 & 208Observer JGWeather Clear and DryScenario AM Existing - Saturday

ROUTE 32

RO

UTE

299

(MA

IN S

TRE

ET)

RO

UTE

299 (MA

IN S

TRE

ET)

ROUTE 208

Right

201 1 0

202 Thru

265 2 0

267 Left

322 1 2

325 Peds

180 0 0

180

InOut Total454 968 1422

2 4 6 1 2 3

457 1431 974

Right 56 0 0

56 Thru

862 2 0 864

Left

137 0 0 137

Peds

103 0 0 103

Out

TotalIn

1192 1158

2350 3

2 5

2 0

2 1197

2357 1160

Left99 0 0

99

Thru267

1 1

269

Right144

0 0

144

Peds173

0 0

173

Out TotalIn

480 683 1163 3 1 4 0 1 1

483 1168 685

Left131 1 0

132

Thru72

6 2 0 72

8 R

ight78

1 0 79

Ped

s90 0 0 90

Tota

lO

utIn

1162

10

25

2187

3

4 7

0 0

0 11

65

2194

10

29

5/12/2012 11:30 AM5/12/2012 01:15 PM Passenger VehiclesTrucksBuses

North

FitzPatrick Engineering, LLCTraffic and Safety Consultants

26 Julia DriveHyde Park, New York 12538

Page 131: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

File Name : Rte 299 at Rtes 32 & 208 - Saturday AM existingSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 5/12/2012Page No : 3

Location Rte 299 @ Routes 32 & 208Observer JGWeather Clear and DryScenario AM Existing - Saturday

ROUTE 32From North

ROUTE 299 (MAIN STREET)From East

ROUTE 208From South

ROUTE 299 (MAIN STREET)From West

Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 11:30 AM to 01:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 12:00 PM

12:00 PM 18 44 48 18 128 10 98 30 13 151 17 36 15 20 88 9 107 17 12 145 51212:15 PM 35 42 43 22 142 6 103 10 7 126 15 35 13 18 81 6 80 16 15 117 46612:30 PM 25 32 42 21 120 6 117 12 16 151 20 25 9 23 77 6 108 11 7 132 48012:45 PM 24 32 41 20 117 6 114 21 14 155 19 37 15 35 106 20 67 22 13 122 500

Total Volume 102 150 174 81 507 28 432 73 50 583 71 133 52 96 352 41 362 66 47 516 1958% App. Total 20.1 29.6 34.3 16 4.8 74.1 12.5 8.6 20.2 37.8 14.8 27.3 7.9 70.2 12.8 9.1

PHF .729 .852 .906 .920 .893 .700 .923 .608 .781 .940 .888 .899 .867 .686 .830 .513 .838 .750 .783 .890 .956

FitzPatrick Engineering, LLCTraffic and Safety Consultants

26 Julia DriveHyde Park, New York 12538

Page 132: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

File Name : RTE 299 @ Wurts Avenue-Saturday PM ExistingSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 5/19/2012Page No : 1

Location Rte 299 @ Wurts AvenueObserver JGWeather Clear and DryScenario PM Existing - Saturday

Groups Printed- Passenger Vehicles - Trucks - BusesBANK EXIT DRIVE

From NorthROUTE 299 (MAIN STREET)

From EastWURTS AVENUE

From SouthROUTE 299 (MAIN STREET)

From WestStart Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total

06:00 PM 4 0 1 25 30 0 117 4 2 123 7 0 3 25 35 8 119 0 1 128 31606:15 PM 5 0 1 16 22 0 101 6 2 109 2 0 1 63 66 2 129 0 2 133 33006:30 PM 2 0 2 17 21 0 93 11 0 104 5 0 2 46 53 6 118 1 1 126 30406:45 PM 5 1 0 11 17 0 97 5 6 108 8 0 0 35 43 4 121 0 1 126 294

Total 16 1 4 69 90 0 408 26 10 444 22 0 6 169 197 20 487 1 5 513 1244

07:00 PM 5 2 1 26 34 0 84 11 9 104 9 0 1 38 48 5 127 0 0 132 31807:15 PM 1 1 0 10 12 0 106 8 0 114 7 0 1 38 46 5 120 0 0 125 29707:30 PM 3 0 1 22 26 0 105 3 2 110 5 0 3 23 31 4 90 0 0 94 26107:45 PM 1 0 0 20 21 0 78 6 4 88 4 0 2 39 45 8 96 0 0 104 258

Total 10 3 2 78 93 0 373 28 15 416 25 0 7 138 170 22 433 0 0 455 1134

Grand Total 26 4 6 147 183 0 781 54 25 860 47 0 13 307 367 42 920 1 5 968 2378Apprch % 14.2 2.2 3.3 80.3 0 90.8 6.3 2.9 12.8 0 3.5 83.7 4.3 95 0.1 0.5

Total % 1.1 0.2 0.3 6.2 7.7 0 32.8 2.3 1.1 36.2 2 0 0.5 12.9 15.4 1.8 38.7 0 0.2 40.7Passenger Vehicles 26 4 6 147 183 0 781 54 25 860 47 0 13 307 367 42 918 1 5 966 2376

% Passenger Vehicles 100 100 100 100 100 0 100 100 100 100 100 0 100 100 100 100 99.8 100 100 99.8 99.9Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 2

% Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0.2 0.1Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

% Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

FitzPatrick Engineering, LLCTraffic and Safety Consultants

26 Julia DriveHyde Park, New York 12538

Page 133: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

File Name : RTE 299 @ Wurts Avenue-Saturday PM ExistingSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 5/19/2012Page No : 2

Location Rte 299 @ Wurts AvenueObserver JGWeather Clear and DryScenario PM Existing - Saturday

BANK EXIT DRIVE

RO

UTE

299

(MA

IN S

TRE

ET)

RO

UTE

299 (MA

IN S

TRE

ET)

WURTS AVENUE

Right

26 0 0

26 Thru

4 0 0 4

Left

6 0 0 6

Peds

147 0 0

147

InOut Total1 183 184 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 184 183

Right 0 0 0 0

Thru

781 0 0 781

Left 54 0 0 54

Peds 25 0 0

25

Out

TotalIn

971 860

1831 2

0 2

0 0

0 973

1833 860

Left13 0 0

13

Thru0 0 0 0

Right47 0 0

47

Peds307

0 0

307

Out TotalIn

100 367 467 0 0 0 0 0 0

100 467 367

Left1 0 0 1

Thru91

8 2 0 92

0 R

ight42

0 0 42

Ped

s5 0 0 5

Tota

lO

utIn

820

966

1786

0

2 2

0 0

0 82

0 17

88

968 5/19/2012 06:00 PM

5/19/2012 07:45 PM Passenger VehiclesTrucksBuses

North

FitzPatrick Engineering, LLCTraffic and Safety Consultants

26 Julia DriveHyde Park, New York 12538

Page 134: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

File Name : RTE 299 @ Wurts Avenue-Saturday PM ExistingSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 5/19/2012Page No : 3

Location Rte 299 @ Wurts AvenueObserver JGWeather Clear and DryScenario PM Existing - Saturday

BANK EXIT DRIVEFrom North

ROUTE 299 (MAIN STREET)From East

WURTS AVENUEFrom South

ROUTE 299 (MAIN STREET)From West

Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 06:00 PM to 07:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 06:15 PM

06:15 PM 5 0 1 16 22 0 101 6 2 109 2 0 1 63 66 2 129 0 2 133 33006:30 PM 2 0 2 17 21 0 93 11 0 104 5 0 2 46 53 6 118 1 1 126 30406:45 PM 5 1 0 11 17 0 97 5 6 108 8 0 0 35 43 4 121 0 1 126 29407:00 PM 5 2 1 26 34 0 84 11 9 104 9 0 1 38 48 5 127 0 0 132 318

Total Volume 17 3 4 70 94 0 375 33 17 425 24 0 4 182 210 17 495 1 4 517 1246% App. Total 18.1 3.2 4.3 74.5 0 88.2 7.8 4 11.4 0 1.9 86.7 3.3 95.7 0.2 0.8

PHF .850 .375 .500 .673 .691 .000 .928 .750 .472 .975 .667 .000 .500 .722 .795 .708 .959 .250 .500 .972 .944

FitzPatrick Engineering, LLCTraffic and Safety Consultants

26 Julia DriveHyde Park, New York 12538

Page 135: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

File Name : Rte 299 at Wurts Avenue - Friday PM existingSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 5/11/2012Page No : 1

Location Route 299 @ Wurts AvenueObserver JGWeather Clear and DryScenario PM Existing - Friday

Groups Printed- Passenger Vehicles - Trucks - BusesBANK EXIT DRIVE

From NorthROUTE 299 (MAIN STREET)

From EastWURTS AVENUE

From SouthROUTE 299 (MAIN STREET)

From WestStart Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total

06:00 PM 3 0 5 7 15 1 133 4 0 138 6 0 2 12 20 6 98 0 0 104 27706:15 PM 3 0 3 6 12 0 117 5 2 124 4 0 2 10 16 3 93 0 0 96 24806:30 PM 2 0 2 4 8 0 107 6 5 118 3 0 3 12 18 3 105 0 2 110 25406:45 PM 2 0 1 2 5 1 99 4 1 105 0 0 3 6 9 1 87 1 3 92 211

Total 10 0 11 19 40 2 456 19 8 485 13 0 10 40 63 13 383 1 5 402 990

07:00 PM 3 0 1 11 15 0 98 7 0 105 5 0 0 11 16 3 73 0 0 76 21207:15 PM 2 0 2 15 19 0 104 7 1 112 2 0 2 7 11 4 93 0 1 98 24007:30 PM 2 1 2 10 15 1 101 11 4 117 1 0 2 6 9 1 83 0 0 84 22507:45 PM 3 1 2 7 13 0 125 6 0 131 4 0 6 10 20 6 64 0 0 70 234

Total 10 2 7 43 62 1 428 31 5 465 12 0 10 34 56 14 313 0 1 328 911

Grand Total 20 2 18 62 102 3 884 50 13 950 25 0 20 74 119 27 696 1 6 730 1901Apprch % 19.6 2 17.6 60.8 0.3 93.1 5.3 1.4 21 0 16.8 62.2 3.7 95.3 0.1 0.8

Total % 1.1 0.1 0.9 3.3 5.4 0.2 46.5 2.6 0.7 50 1.3 0 1.1 3.9 6.3 1.4 36.6 0.1 0.3 38.4Passenger Vehicles 20 2 18 62 102 3 882 50 13 948 25 0 20 74 119 27 695 1 6 729 1898

% Passenger Vehicles 100 100 100 100 100 100 99.8 100 100 99.8 100 0 100 100 100 100 99.9 100 100 99.9 99.8Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

% Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 0 0 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2

% Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 0 0 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 0 0 0.1 0.1

FitzPatrick Engineering, LLCTraffic and Safety Consultants

26 Julia DriveHyde Park, New York 12538

Page 136: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

File Name : Rte 299 at Wurts Avenue - Friday PM existingSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 5/11/2012Page No : 2

Location Route 299 @ Wurts AvenueObserver JGWeather Clear and DryScenario PM Existing - Friday

BANK EXIT DRIVE

RO

UTE

299

(MA

IN S

TRE

ET)

RO

UTE

299 (MA

IN S

TRE

ET)

WURTS AVENUE

Right

20 0 0

20 Thru

2 0 0 2

Left

18 0 0

18 Peds

62 0 0

62

InOut Total4 102 106 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 106 102

Right 3 0 0 3

Thru

882 1 1 884

Left 50 0 0 50

Peds 13 0 0

13

Out

TotalIn

738 948

1686 0

1 1

1 1

2 739

1689 950

Left20 0 0

20

Thru0 0 0 0

Right25 0 0

25

Peds74 0 0

74

Out TotalIn

79 119 198 0 0 0 0 0 0

79 198 119

Left1 0 0 1

Thru69

5 0 1 69

6 R

ight27

0 0 27

Ped

s6 0 0 6

Tota

lO

utIn

922

729

1651

1

0 1

1 1

2 92

4 16

54

730 5/11/2012 06:00 PM

5/11/2012 07:45 PM Passenger VehiclesTrucksBuses

North

FitzPatrick Engineering, LLCTraffic and Safety Consultants

26 Julia DriveHyde Park, New York 12538

Page 137: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

File Name : Rte 299 at Wurts Avenue - Friday PM existingSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 5/11/2012Page No : 3

Location Route 299 @ Wurts AvenueObserver JGWeather Clear and DryScenario PM Existing - Friday

BANK EXIT DRIVEFrom North

ROUTE 299 (MAIN STREET)From East

WURTS AVENUEFrom South

ROUTE 299 (MAIN STREET)From West

Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 06:00 PM to 07:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 06:00 PM

06:00 PM 3 0 5 7 15 1 133 4 0 138 6 0 2 12 20 6 98 0 0 104 27706:15 PM 3 0 3 6 12 0 117 5 2 124 4 0 2 10 16 3 93 0 0 96 24806:30 PM 2 0 2 4 8 0 107 6 5 118 3 0 3 12 18 3 105 0 2 110 25406:45 PM 2 0 1 2 5 1 99 4 1 105 0 0 3 6 9 1 87 1 3 92 211

Total Volume 10 0 11 19 40 2 456 19 8 485 13 0 10 40 63 13 383 1 5 402 990% App. Total 25 0 27.5 47.5 0.4 94 3.9 1.6 20.6 0 15.9 63.5 3.2 95.3 0.2 1.2

PHF .833 .000 .550 .679 .667 .500 .857 .792 .400 .879 .542 .000 .833 .833 .788 .542 .912 .250 .417 .914 .894

FitzPatrick Engineering, LLCTraffic and Safety Consultants

26 Julia DriveHyde Park, New York 12538

Page 138: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

File Name : RTE 299 @ Water St & Huguenot St-Saturday PM ExistingSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 5/19/2012Page No : 1

Location Rte 299 @ Water & HuguenotObserver JGWeather Clear and DryScenario PM Existing - Saturday

Groups Printed- Passenger Vehicles - Trucks - BusesHUGUENOT STREET

From NorthROUTE 299 (MAIN STREET)

From EastWATER STREET

From SouthROUTE 299 (MAIN STREET)

From WestStart Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total

06:00 PM 10 5 14 0 29 17 93 11 0 121 13 4 9 0 26 4 106 28 0 138 31406:15 PM 9 2 13 1 25 16 76 14 2 108 10 3 5 0 18 10 108 16 0 134 28506:30 PM 11 2 11 0 24 8 74 13 0 95 7 2 12 0 21 10 100 13 0 123 26306:45 PM 11 7 18 11 47 14 75 7 0 96 7 4 8 0 19 16 108 13 0 137 299

Total 41 16 56 12 125 55 318 45 2 420 37 13 34 0 84 40 422 70 0 532 1161

07:00 PM 9 8 12 0 29 8 69 6 0 83 14 3 3 1 21 5 100 15 0 120 25307:15 PM 4 3 9 3 19 15 73 13 0 101 10 0 4 0 14 5 108 16 0 129 26307:30 PM 13 6 16 0 35 13 86 10 1 110 15 2 4 0 21 8 56 6 3 73 23907:45 PM 3 1 23 1 28 13 55 12 4 84 4 3 7 2 16 5 75 7 3 90 218

Total 29 18 60 4 111 49 283 41 5 378 43 8 18 3 72 23 339 44 6 412 973

Grand Total 70 34 116 16 236 104 601 86 7 798 80 21 52 3 156 63 761 114 6 944 2134Apprch % 29.7 14.4 49.2 6.8 13 75.3 10.8 0.9 51.3 13.5 33.3 1.9 6.7 80.6 12.1 0.6

Total % 3.3 1.6 5.4 0.7 11.1 4.9 28.2 4 0.3 37.4 3.7 1 2.4 0.1 7.3 3 35.7 5.3 0.3 44.2Passenger Vehicles 70 34 116 16 236 104 601 86 7 798 80 21 52 3 156 63 760 114 6 943 2133

% Passenger Vehicles 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99.9 100 100 99.9 100Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1

% Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 0 0 0.1 0Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

% Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

FitzPatrick Engineering, LLCTraffic and Safety Consultants

26 Julia DriveHyde Park, New York 12538

Page 139: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

File Name : RTE 299 @ Water St & Huguenot St-Saturday PM ExistingSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 5/19/2012Page No : 2

Location Rte 299 @ Water & HuguenotObserver JGWeather Clear and DryScenario PM Existing - Saturday

HUGUENOT STREET

RO

UTE

299

(MA

IN S

TRE

ET)

RO

UTE

299 (MA

IN S

TRE

ET)

WATER STREET

Right

70 0 0

70 Thru

34 0 0

34 Left

116 0 0

116 Peds

16 0 0

16

InOut Total239 236 475

0 0 0 0 0 0

239 475 236

Right

104 0 0 104

Thru

601 0 0 601

Left 86 0 0 86

Peds 7 0 0 7

Out

TotalIn

956 798

1754 1

0 1

0 0

0 957

1755 798

Left52 0 0

52

Thru21 0 0

21

Right80 0 0

80

Peds3 0 0 3

Out TotalIn

183 156 339 0 0 0 0 0 0

183 339 156

Left114 0 0

114

Thru76

0 1 0 76

1 R

ight63

0 0 63

Ped

s6 0 0 6

Tota

lO

utIn

723

943

1666

0

1 1

0 0

0 72

3 16

67

944 5/19/2012 06:00 PM

5/19/2012 07:45 PM Passenger VehiclesTrucksBuses

North

FitzPatrick Engineering, LLCTraffic and Safety Consultants

26 Julia DriveHyde Park, New York 12538

Page 140: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

File Name : RTE 299 @ Water St & Huguenot St-Saturday PM ExistingSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 5/19/2012Page No : 3

Location Rte 299 @ Water & HuguenotObserver JGWeather Clear and DryScenario PM Existing - Saturday

HUGUENOT STREETFrom North

ROUTE 299 (MAIN STREET)From East

WATER STREETFrom South

ROUTE 299 (MAIN STREET)From West

Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 06:00 PM to 07:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 06:00 PM

06:00 PM 10 5 14 0 29 17 93 11 0 121 13 4 9 0 26 4 106 28 0 138 31406:15 PM 9 2 13 1 25 16 76 14 2 108 10 3 5 0 18 10 108 16 0 134 28506:30 PM 11 2 11 0 24 8 74 13 0 95 7 2 12 0 21 10 100 13 0 123 26306:45 PM 11 7 18 11 47 14 75 7 0 96 7 4 8 0 19 16 108 13 0 137 299

Total Volume 41 16 56 12 125 55 318 45 2 420 37 13 34 0 84 40 422 70 0 532 1161% App. Total 32.8 12.8 44.8 9.6 13.1 75.7 10.7 0.5 44 15.5 40.5 0 7.5 79.3 13.2 0

PHF .932 .571 .778 .273 .665 .809 .855 .804 .250 .868 .712 .813 .708 .000 .808 .625 .977 .625 .000 .964 .924

FitzPatrick Engineering, LLCTraffic and Safety Consultants

26 Julia DriveHyde Park, New York 12538

Page 141: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

File Name : RTE 299 @ Water St-Friday PM ExistingSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 5/18/2012Page No : 1

Location Rte 299 @ Water & HuguenotObserver JGWeather Clear and DryScenario PM Existing - Friday

Groups Printed- Passenger Vehicles - Trucks - BusesHUGUENOT STREET

From NorthROUTE 299 (MAIN STREET)

From EastWATER STREET

From SouthROUTE 299 (MAIN STREET)

From WestStart Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total

06:00 PM 17 5 3 0 25 17 120 4 0 141 6 4 9 0 19 9 110 11 0 130 31506:15 PM 15 2 8 1 26 14 83 3 0 100 5 2 7 0 14 9 103 9 1 122 26206:30 PM 10 6 6 0 22 16 81 5 0 102 6 2 4 2 14 11 85 14 0 110 24806:45 PM 7 3 9 0 19 8 103 2 0 113 8 2 7 0 17 4 82 15 0 101 250

Total 49 16 26 1 92 55 387 14 0 456 25 10 27 2 64 33 380 49 1 463 1075

07:00 PM 13 5 9 0 27 15 86 6 1 108 5 1 3 0 9 7 90 18 0 115 25907:15 PM 11 3 11 0 25 6 82 4 0 92 5 0 3 0 8 8 79 12 0 99 22407:30 PM 10 3 7 6 26 11 85 2 0 98 7 2 6 0 15 9 66 9 0 84 22307:45 PM 7 11 15 1 34 26 83 5 1 115 8 4 9 0 21 1 42 10 0 53 223

Total 41 22 42 7 112 58 336 17 2 413 25 7 21 0 53 25 277 49 0 351 929

Grand Total 90 38 68 8 204 113 723 31 2 869 50 17 48 2 117 58 657 98 1 814 2004Apprch % 44.1 18.6 33.3 3.9 13 83.2 3.6 0.2 42.7 14.5 41 1.7 7.1 80.7 12 0.1

Total % 4.5 1.9 3.4 0.4 10.2 5.6 36.1 1.5 0.1 43.4 2.5 0.8 2.4 0.1 5.8 2.9 32.8 4.9 0 40.6Passenger Vehicles 90 38 68 8 204 113 721 31 2 867 50 17 48 2 117 58 657 98 1 814 2002

% Passenger Vehicles 100 100 100 100 100 100 99.7 100 100 99.8 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99.9Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

% Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 0 0 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

% Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 0 0 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

FitzPatrick Engineering, LLCTraffic and Safety Consultants

26 Julia DriveHyde Park, New York 12538

Page 142: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

File Name : RTE 299 @ Water St-Friday PM ExistingSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 5/18/2012Page No : 2

Location Rte 299 @ Water & HuguenotObserver JGWeather Clear and DryScenario PM Existing - Friday

HUGUENOT STREET

RO

UTE

299

(MA

IN S

TRE

ET)

RO

UTE

299 (MA

IN S

TRE

ET)

WATER STREET

Right

90 0 0

90 Thru

38 0 0

38 Left

68 0 0

68 Peds

8 0 0 8

InOut Total228 204 432

0 0 0 0 0 0

228 432 204

Right

113 0 0 113

Thru

721 1 1 723

Left 31 0 0 31

Peds 2 0 0 2

Out

TotalIn

775 867

1642 0

1 1

0 1

1 775

1644 869

Left48 0 0

48

Thru17 0 0

17

Right50 0 0

50

Peds2 0 0 2

Out TotalIn

127 117 244 0 0 0 0 0 0

127 244 117

Left98

0 0 98

Thru65

7 0 0 65

7 R

ight58

0 0 58

Ped

s1 0 0 1

Tota

lO

utIn

859

814

1673

1

0 1

1 0

1 86

1 16

75

814 5/18/2012 06:00 PM

5/18/2012 07:45 PM Passenger VehiclesTrucksBuses

North

FitzPatrick Engineering, LLCTraffic and Safety Consultants

26 Julia DriveHyde Park, New York 12538

Page 143: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

File Name : RTE 299 @ Water St-Friday PM ExistingSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 5/18/2012Page No : 3

Location Rte 299 @ Water & HuguenotObserver JGWeather Clear and DryScenario PM Existing - Friday

HUGUENOT STREETFrom North

ROUTE 299 (MAIN STREET)From East

WATER STREETFrom South

ROUTE 299 (MAIN STREET)From West

Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 06:00 PM to 07:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 06:00 PM

06:00 PM 17 5 3 0 25 17 120 4 0 141 6 4 9 0 19 9 110 11 0 130 31506:15 PM 15 2 8 1 26 14 83 3 0 100 5 2 7 0 14 9 103 9 1 122 26206:30 PM 10 6 6 0 22 16 81 5 0 102 6 2 4 2 14 11 85 14 0 110 24806:45 PM 7 3 9 0 19 8 103 2 0 113 8 2 7 0 17 4 82 15 0 101 250

Total Volume 49 16 26 1 92 55 387 14 0 456 25 10 27 2 64 33 380 49 1 463 1075% App. Total 53.3 17.4 28.3 1.1 12.1 84.9 3.1 0 39.1 15.6 42.2 3.1 7.1 82.1 10.6 0.2

PHF .721 .667 .722 .250 .885 .809 .806 .700 .000 .809 .781 .625 .750 .250 .842 .750 .864 .817 .250 .890 .853

FitzPatrick Engineering, LLCTraffic and Safety Consultants

26 Julia DriveHyde Park, New York 12538

Page 144: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

File Name : Rte 299 at Rtes 32 & 208 - Saturday PM existingSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 5/12/2012Page No : 1

Location Rte 299 @ Routes 32 & 208Observer JGWeather Clear and DryScenario PM Existing - Saturday

Groups Printed- Passenger Vehicles - Trucks - BusesROUTE 32From North

ROUTE 299 (MAIN STREET)From East

ROUTE 208From South

RTE 299 (MAIN STREET)From West

Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total06:00 PM 23 32 42 38 135 6 85 15 17 123 22 20 7 37 86 17 95 11 47 170 51406:15 PM 17 31 37 19 104 7 58 21 10 96 14 31 6 40 91 7 120 15 22 164 45506:30 PM 20 24 36 33 113 5 86 18 11 120 22 23 14 39 98 9 102 26 17 154 48506:45 PM 12 27 35 35 109 9 82 16 22 129 10 33 17 56 116 10 116 17 26 169 523

Total 72 114 150 125 461 27 311 70 60 468 68 107 44 172 391 43 433 69 112 657 1977

07:00 PM 18 23 35 48 124 9 81 14 20 124 16 22 12 44 94 13 118 14 23 168 51007:15 PM 22 28 37 28 115 17 67 21 28 133 22 21 11 32 86 14 92 8 19 133 46707:30 PM 20 22 39 33 114 13 58 21 10 102 11 12 8 44 75 9 83 9 21 122 41307:45 PM 14 19 28 36 97 9 81 12 31 133 14 19 14 42 89 13 68 11 31 123 442

Total 74 92 139 145 450 48 287 68 89 492 63 74 45 162 344 49 361 42 94 546 1832

Grand Total 146 206 289 270 911 75 598 138 149 960 131 181 89 334 735 92 794 111 206 1203 3809Apprch % 16 22.6 31.7 29.6 7.8 62.3 14.4 15.5 17.8 24.6 12.1 45.4 7.6 66 9.2 17.1

Total % 3.8 5.4 7.6 7.1 23.9 2 15.7 3.6 3.9 25.2 3.4 4.8 2.3 8.8 19.3 2.4 20.8 2.9 5.4 31.6Passenger Vehicles 146 204 287 270 907 75 596 138 149 958 131 181 89 334 735 92 793 111 206 1202 3802

% Passenger Vehicles 100 99 99.3 100 99.6 100 99.7 100 100 99.8 100 100 100 100 100 100 99.9 100 100 99.9 99.8Trucks 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 5

% Trucks 0 1 0 0 0.2 0 0.3 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 0 0 0.1 0.1Buses 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2

% Buses 0 0 0.7 0 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1

FitzPatrick Engineering, LLCTraffic and Safety Consultants

26 Julia DriveHyde Park, New York 12538

Page 145: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

File Name : Rte 299 at Rtes 32 & 208 - Saturday PM existingSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 5/12/2012Page No : 2

Location Rte 299 @ Routes 32 & 208Observer JGWeather Clear and DryScenario PM Existing - Saturday

ROUTE 32

RTE

299

(MA

IN S

TRE

ET)

R

OU

TE 299 (M

AIN

STR

EE

T)

ROUTE 208

Right

146 0 0

146 Thru

204 2 0

206 Left

287 0 2

289 Peds

270 0 0

270

InOut Total367 907 1274

0 2 2 0 2 2

367 1278 911

Right 75 0 0

75 Thru

596 2 0 598

Left

138 0 0 138

Peds

149 0 0 149

Out

TotalIn

1211 958

2169 1

2 3

2 0

2 1214

2174 960

Left89 0 0

89

Thru181

0 0

181

Right131

0 0

131

Peds334

0 0

334

Out TotalIn

434 735 1169 2 0 2 0 0 0

436 1171 735

Left111 0 0

111

Thru79

3 1 0 79

4 R

ight92

0 0 92

Ped

s

206 0 0

206

Tota

lO

utIn

831

1202

20

33

2 1

3 0

0 0

833

2036

12

03

5/12/2012 06:00 PM5/12/2012 07:45 PM Passenger VehiclesTrucksBuses

North

FitzPatrick Engineering, LLCTraffic and Safety Consultants

26 Julia DriveHyde Park, New York 12538

Page 146: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

File Name : Rte 299 at Rtes 32 & 208 - Saturday PM existingSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 5/12/2012Page No : 3

Location Rte 299 @ Routes 32 & 208Observer JGWeather Clear and DryScenario PM Existing - Saturday

ROUTE 32From North

ROUTE 299 (MAIN STREET)From East

ROUTE 208From South

RTE 299 (MAIN STREET)From West

Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 06:00 PM to 07:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 06:30 PM

06:30 PM 20 24 36 33 113 5 86 18 11 120 22 23 14 39 98 9 102 26 17 154 48506:45 PM 12 27 35 35 109 9 82 16 22 129 10 33 17 56 116 10 116 17 26 169 52307:00 PM 18 23 35 48 124 9 81 14 20 124 16 22 12 44 94 13 118 14 23 168 51007:15 PM 22 28 37 28 115 17 67 21 28 133 22 21 11 32 86 14 92 8 19 133 467

Total Volume 72 102 143 144 461 40 316 69 81 506 70 99 54 171 394 46 428 65 85 624 1985% App. Total 15.6 22.1 31 31.2 7.9 62.5 13.6 16 17.8 25.1 13.7 43.4 7.4 68.6 10.4 13.6

PHF .818 .911 .966 .750 .929 .588 .919 .821 .723 .951 .795 .750 .794 .763 .849 .821 .907 .625 .817 .923 .949

FitzPatrick Engineering, LLCTraffic and Safety Consultants

26 Julia DriveHyde Park, New York 12538

Page 147: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

File Name : Rte 299 at Rtes 32 & 208 - Fri PM existingSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 4/27/2012Page No : 1

Location RTE 299 @ Routes 32 & 208Observer JGWeather Clear and DryScenario PM Existing - Friday

Groups Printed- Passenger Vehicles - Trucks - BusesROUTE 32From North

ROUTE 299 (MAIN STREET)From East

ROUTE 208From South

ROUTE 299 (MAIN STREET)From West

Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total06:00 PM 20 42 45 9 116 11 91 16 8 126 11 37 19 26 93 3 95 17 12 127 46206:15 PM 14 38 55 26 133 10 85 24 12 131 24 36 22 4 86 11 79 14 3 107 45706:30 PM 9 28 38 11 86 10 91 10 7 118 17 40 13 14 84 15 90 20 5 130 41806:45 PM 27 40 40 10 117 7 82 13 9 111 20 31 14 15 80 3 77 14 4 98 406

Total 70 148 178 56 452 38 349 63 36 486 72 144 68 59 343 32 341 65 24 462 1743

07:00 PM 11 30 33 21 95 10 97 13 20 140 21 27 14 22 84 6 73 12 17 108 42707:15 PM 12 38 39 12 101 8 106 22 11 147 24 29 21 27 101 10 64 8 9 91 44007:30 PM 13 34 35 13 95 5 77 18 13 113 23 24 15 25 87 15 57 10 19 101 39607:45 PM 10 24 47 15 96 17 71 12 15 115 17 19 11 20 67 8 74 9 10 101 379

Total 46 126 154 61 387 40 351 65 59 515 85 99 61 94 339 39 268 39 55 401 1642

Grand Total 116 274 332 117 839 78 700 128 95 1001 157 243 129 153 682 71 609 104 79 863 3385Apprch % 13.8 32.7 39.6 13.9 7.8 69.9 12.8 9.5 23 35.6 18.9 22.4 8.2 70.6 12.1 9.2

Total % 3.4 8.1 9.8 3.5 24.8 2.3 20.7 3.8 2.8 29.6 4.6 7.2 3.8 4.5 20.1 2.1 18 3.1 2.3 25.5Passenger Vehicles 116 272 329 117 834 78 698 127 95 998 156 243 128 153 680 71 608 104 79 862 3374

% Passenger Vehicles 100 99.3 99.1 100 99.4 100 99.7 99.2 100 99.7 99.4 100 99.2 100 99.7 100 99.8 100 100 99.9 99.7Trucks 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 4

% Trucks 0 0.4 0 0 0.1 0 0.1 0.8 0 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0.1 0.1Buses 0 1 3 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 7

% Buses 0 0.4 0.9 0 0.5 0 0.1 0 0 0.1 0.6 0 0.8 0 0.3 0 0 0 0 0 0.2

FitzPatrick Engineering, LLCTraffic and Safety Consultants

26 Julia DriveHyde Park, New York 12538

Page 148: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

File Name : Rte 299 at Rtes 32 & 208 - Fri PM existingSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 4/27/2012Page No : 2

Location RTE 299 @ Routes 32 & 208Observer JGWeather Clear and DryScenario PM Existing - Friday

ROUTE 32

RO

UTE

299

(MA

IN S

TRE

ET)

RO

UTE

299 (MA

IN S

TRE

ET)

ROUTE 208

Right

116 0 0

116 Thru

272 1 1

274 Left

329 0 3

332 Peds

117 0 0

117

InOut Total425 834 1259

0 1 1 0 4 4

425 1264 839

Right 78 0 0

78 Thru

698 1 1 700

Left

127 1 0 128

Peds 95 0 0

95

Out

TotalIn

1093 998

2091 1

2 3

4 1

5 1098

2099 1001

Left128

0 1

129

Thru243

0 0

243

Right156

0 1

157

Peds153

0 0

153

Out TotalIn

470 680 1150 2 0 2 1 2 3

473 1155 682

Left104 0 0

104

Thru60

8 1 0 60

9 R

ight71

0 0 71

Ped

s79 0 0 79

Tota

lO

utIn

942

862

1804

1

1 2

2 0

2 94

5 18

08

863 4/27/2012 06:00 PM

4/27/2012 07:45 PM Passenger VehiclesTrucksBuses

North

FitzPatrick Engineering, LLCTraffic and Safety Consultants

26 Julia DriveHyde Park, New York 12538

Page 149: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

File Name : Rte 299 at Rtes 32 & 208 - Fri PM existingSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 4/27/2012Page No : 3

Location RTE 299 @ Routes 32 & 208Observer JGWeather Clear and DryScenario PM Existing - Friday

ROUTE 32From North

ROUTE 299 (MAIN STREET)From East

ROUTE 208From South

ROUTE 299 (MAIN STREET)From West

Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 06:00 PM to 07:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 06:00 PM

06:00 PM 20 42 45 9 116 11 91 16 8 126 11 37 19 26 93 3 95 17 12 127 46206:15 PM 14 38 55 26 133 10 85 24 12 131 24 36 22 4 86 11 79 14 3 107 45706:30 PM 9 28 38 11 86 10 91 10 7 118 17 40 13 14 84 15 90 20 5 130 41806:45 PM 27 40 40 10 117 7 82 13 9 111 20 31 14 15 80 3 77 14 4 98 406

Total Volume 70 148 178 56 452 38 349 63 36 486 72 144 68 59 343 32 341 65 24 462 1743% App. Total 15.5 32.7 39.4 12.4 7.8 71.8 13 7.4 21 42 19.8 17.2 6.9 73.8 14.1 5.2

PHF .648 .881 .809 .538 .850 .864 .959 .656 .750 .927 .750 .900 .773 .567 .922 .533 .897 .813 .500 .888 .943

FitzPatrick Engineering, LLCTraffic and Safety Consultants

26 Julia DriveHyde Park, New York 12538

Page 150: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

File Name : RTE 299 @ Wurts Avenue-Saturday AM ExistingSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 5/19/2012Page No : 1

Location Rte 299 @ Wurts AvenueObserver JGWeather Clear and DryScenario AM Existing - Saturday

Groups Printed- Passenger Vehicles - Trucks - BusesBANK EXIT DRIVE

From NorthROUTE 299 (MAIN STREET)

From EastWURTS AVENUE

From SouthROUTE 299 (MAIN STREET)

From WestStart Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total

11:30 AM 4 1 4 10 19 0 144 6 9 159 9 0 2 22 33 4 104 0 2 110 32111:45 AM 3 3 5 22 33 0 128 5 3 136 8 0 3 13 24 0 96 0 2 98 291

Total 7 4 9 32 52 0 272 11 12 295 17 0 5 35 57 4 200 0 4 208 612

12:00 PM 7 0 4 10 21 0 122 11 5 138 6 0 4 16 26 1 100 0 0 101 28612:15 PM 10 0 5 12 27 0 141 10 4 155 6 0 2 11 19 3 89 0 1 93 29412:30 PM 3 0 4 12 19 0 136 5 3 144 7 0 2 15 24 7 102 0 0 109 29612:45 PM 10 0 2 18 30 0 122 10 4 136 5 0 1 16 22 5 109 0 1 115 303

Total 30 0 15 52 97 0 521 36 16 573 24 0 9 58 91 16 400 0 2 418 1179

01:00 PM 7 0 3 15 25 0 127 6 1 134 3 0 3 32 38 6 110 0 3 119 31601:15 PM 4 0 1 9 14 0 139 6 5 150 6 0 3 30 39 8 102 0 1 111 314

Grand Total 48 4 28 108 188 0 1059 59 34 1152 50 0 20 155 225 34 812 0 10 856 2421Apprch % 25.5 2.1 14.9 57.4 0 91.9 5.1 3 22.2 0 8.9 68.9 4 94.9 0 1.2

Total % 2 0.2 1.2 4.5 7.8 0 43.7 2.4 1.4 47.6 2.1 0 0.8 6.4 9.3 1.4 33.5 0 0.4 35.4Passenger Vehicles 48 4 28 108 188 0 1052 59 34 1145 50 0 20 155 225 34 810 0 10 854 2412

% Passenger Vehicles 100 100 100 100 100 0 99.3 100 100 99.4 100 0 100 100 100 100 99.8 0 100 99.8 99.6Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 9

% Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.7 0 0 0.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0.2 0.4Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

% Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

FitzPatrick Engineering, LLCTraffic and Safety Consultants

26 Julia DriveHyde Park, New York 12538

Page 151: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

File Name : RTE 299 @ Wurts Avenue-Saturday AM ExistingSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 5/19/2012Page No : 2

Location Rte 299 @ Wurts AvenueObserver JGWeather Clear and DryScenario AM Existing - Saturday

BANK EXIT DRIVE

RO

UTE

299

(MA

IN S

TRE

ET)

RO

UTE

299 (MA

IN S

TRE

ET)

WURTS AVENUE

Right

48 0 0

48 Thru

4 0 0 4

Left

28 0 0

28 Peds

108 0 0

108

InOut Total0 188 188 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 188 188

Right 0 0 0 0

Thru

1052 7 0 1059

Left 59 0 0 59

Peds 34 0 0

34

Out

TotalIn

888 1145

2033 2

7 9

0 0

0 890

2042 1152

Left20 0 0

20

Thru0 0 0 0

Right50 0 0

50

Peds155

0 0

155

Out TotalIn

97 225 322 0 0 0 0 0 0

97 322 225

Left0 0 0 0

Thru81

0 2 0 81

2 R

ight34

0 0 34

Ped

s10 0 0 10

Tota

lO

utIn

1120

85

4 19

74

7 2

9 0

0 0

1127

19

83

856 5/19/2012 11:30 AM

5/19/2012 01:15 PM Passenger VehiclesTrucksBuses

North

FitzPatrick Engineering, LLCTraffic and Safety Consultants

26 Julia DriveHyde Park, New York 12538

Page 152: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

File Name : RTE 299 @ Wurts Avenue-Saturday AM ExistingSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 5/19/2012Page No : 3

Location Rte 299 @ Wurts AvenueObserver JGWeather Clear and DryScenario AM Existing - Saturday

BANK EXIT DRIVEFrom North

ROUTE 299 (MAIN STREET)From East

WURTS AVENUEFrom South

ROUTE 299 (MAIN STREET)From West

Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 11:30 AM to 01:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 12:30 PM

12:30 PM 3 0 4 12 19 0 136 5 3 144 7 0 2 15 24 7 102 0 0 109 29612:45 PM 10 0 2 18 30 0 122 10 4 136 5 0 1 16 22 5 109 0 1 115 30301:00 PM 7 0 3 15 25 0 127 6 1 134 3 0 3 32 38 6 110 0 3 119 31601:15 PM 4 0 1 9 14 0 139 6 5 150 6 0 3 30 39 8 102 0 1 111 314

Total Volume 24 0 10 54 88 0 524 27 13 564 21 0 9 93 123 26 423 0 5 454 1229% App. Total 27.3 0 11.4 61.4 0 92.9 4.8 2.3 17.1 0 7.3 75.6 5.7 93.2 0 1.1

PHF .600 .000 .625 .750 .733 .000 .942 .675 .650 .940 .750 .000 .750 .727 .788 .813 .961 .000 .417 .954 .972

FitzPatrick Engineering, LLCTraffic and Safety Consultants

26 Julia DriveHyde Park, New York 12538

Page 153: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

File Name : RTE 299 @ Water St-Saturday AM ExistingSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 5/19/2012Page No : 1

Location Rte 299 @ Water & HuguenotObserver JGWeather Clear and DryScenario AM Existing - Saturday

Groups Printed- Passenger Vehicles - Trucks - BusesHUGUENOT STREET

From NorthROUTE 299 (MAIN STREET)

From EastWATER STREET

From SouthROUTE 299 (MAIN STREET)

From WestStart Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total

11:30 AM 13 2 5 0 20 10 119 13 5 147 10 2 3 3 18 13 82 14 0 109 29411:45 AM 13 4 0 1 18 7 115 11 1 134 9 4 4 0 17 9 98 13 0 120 289

Total 26 6 5 1 38 17 234 24 6 281 19 6 7 3 35 22 180 27 0 229 583

12:00 PM 22 2 4 0 28 15 106 12 1 134 16 4 6 1 27 13 72 10 0 95 28412:15 PM 16 1 4 0 21 8 124 10 0 142 9 1 11 0 21 6 84 17 0 107 29112:30 PM 27 6 6 1 40 16 118 3 0 137 13 0 5 1 19 12 80 16 2 110 30612:45 PM 23 1 3 3 30 12 103 15 0 130 12 3 9 1 25 18 95 15 2 130 315

Total 88 10 17 4 119 51 451 40 1 543 50 8 31 3 92 49 331 58 4 442 1196

01:00 PM 19 4 4 0 27 14 113 10 0 137 11 2 7 0 20 8 98 11 0 117 30101:15 PM 13 5 5 0 23 12 122 11 2 147 7 2 13 1 23 10 87 10 0 107 300

Grand Total 146 25 31 5 207 94 920 85 9 1108 87 18 58 7 170 89 696 106 4 895 2380Apprch % 70.5 12.1 15 2.4 8.5 83 7.7 0.8 51.2 10.6 34.1 4.1 9.9 77.8 11.8 0.4

Total % 6.1 1.1 1.3 0.2 8.7 3.9 38.7 3.6 0.4 46.6 3.7 0.8 2.4 0.3 7.1 3.7 29.2 4.5 0.2 37.6Passenger Vehicles 146 25 31 5 207 93 917 85 9 1104 87 18 58 7 170 88 696 106 4 894 2375

% Passenger Vehicles 100 100 100 100 100 98.9 99.7 100 100 99.6 100 100 100 100 100 98.9 100 100 100 99.9 99.8Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 5

% Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 1.1 0.3 0 0 0.4 0 0 0 0 0 1.1 0 0 0 0.1 0.2Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

% Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

FitzPatrick Engineering, LLCTraffic and Safety Consultants

26 Julia DriveHyde Park, New York 12538

Page 154: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

File Name : RTE 299 @ Water St-Saturday AM ExistingSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 5/19/2012Page No : 2

Location Rte 299 @ Water & HuguenotObserver JGWeather Clear and DryScenario AM Existing - Saturday

HUGUENOT STREET

RO

UTE

299

(MA

IN S

TRE

ET)

RO

UTE

299 (MA

IN S

TRE

ET)

WATER STREET

Right

146 0 0

146 Thru

25 0 0

25 Left

31 0 0

31 Peds

5 0 0 5

InOut Total217 207 424

1 0 1 0 0 0

218 425 207

Right 93 1 0

94 Thru

917 3 0 920

Left 85 0 0 85

Peds 9 0 0 9

Out

TotalIn

814 1104

1918 0

4 4

0 0

0 814

1922 1108

Left58 0 0

58

Thru18 0 0

18

Right87 0 0

87

Peds7 0 0 7

Out TotalIn

198 170 368 1 0 1 0 0 0

199 369 170

Left106 0 0

106

Thru69

6 0 0 69

6 R

ight88

1 0 89

Ped

s4 0 0 4

Tota

lO

utIn

1121

89

4 20

15

3 1

4 0

0 0

1124

20

19

895 5/19/2012 11:30 AM

5/19/2012 01:15 PM Passenger VehiclesTrucksBuses

North

FitzPatrick Engineering, LLCTraffic and Safety Consultants

26 Julia DriveHyde Park, New York 12538

Page 155: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

File Name : RTE 299 @ Water St-Saturday AM ExistingSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 5/19/2012Page No : 3

Location Rte 299 @ Water & HuguenotObserver JGWeather Clear and DryScenario AM Existing - Saturday

HUGUENOT STREETFrom North

ROUTE 299 (MAIN STREET)From East

WATER STREETFrom South

ROUTE 299 (MAIN STREET)From West

Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 11:30 AM to 01:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 12:30 PM

12:30 PM 27 6 6 1 40 16 118 3 0 137 13 0 5 1 19 12 80 16 2 110 30612:45 PM 23 1 3 3 30 12 103 15 0 130 12 3 9 1 25 18 95 15 2 130 31501:00 PM 19 4 4 0 27 14 113 10 0 137 11 2 7 0 20 8 98 11 0 117 30101:15 PM 13 5 5 0 23 12 122 11 2 147 7 2 13 1 23 10 87 10 0 107 300

Total Volume 82 16 18 4 120 54 456 39 2 551 43 7 34 3 87 48 360 52 4 464 1222% App. Total 68.3 13.3 15 3.3 9.8 82.8 7.1 0.4 49.4 8 39.1 3.4 10.3 77.6 11.2 0.9

PHF .759 .667 .750 .333 .750 .844 .934 .650 .250 .937 .827 .583 .654 .750 .870 .667 .918 .813 .500 .892 .970

FitzPatrick Engineering, LLCTraffic and Safety Consultants

26 Julia DriveHyde Park, New York 12538

Page 156: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

STATION: 860573 New York State Department of TransportationTraffic Count Hourly Report

Page 1 of 2

ROUTE #: NY 299 ROAD NAME: RT 299 FROM: SPRINGTOWN RD TO: RT 208 START RT 32 OLAP COUNTY: UlsterDIRECTION: Eastbound FACTOR GROUP: 30 REC. SERIAL #: 0098 FUNC. CLASS: 02 VILLAGE: NEW PALTZSTATE DIR CODE: 1 WK OF YR: 38 PLACEMENT: 50 Ft. E of Huguenot St. NHS: no LION#:DATE OF COUNT: 09/18/2009 @ REF MARKER: 299 86011025 JURIS: Village BIN: 3045230NOTES LANE 1: Week 37 East Bound ADDL DATA: CC Stn: RR CROSSING:

COUNT TYPE: AXLE PAIRS BATCH ID: R08-R08cww37b HPMS SAMPLE: COUNT TAKEN BY: ORG CODE: TST INITIALS: --- PROCESSED BY: ORG CODE: DOT INITIALS: jh

12TO1

1TO2

2TO3

3TO4

4TO5

5TO6

6TO7

7TO8

8TO9

9TO10

10TO11

11TO12

12TO1

1TO2

2TO3

3TO4

4TO5

5TO6

6TO7

7TO8

8TO9

9TO10

10TO11

11TO12

DAILY DAILYDAILY HIGH HIGH

AM PMDATE DAY TOTAL COUNT HOUR1 T2 W3 T4 F5 S6 S7 M8 T9 W

10 T11 F12 S13 S14 M15 T16 W17 T18 F19 S20 S21 M22 T23 W24 T25 F26 S27 S28 M29 T30 W

332 380 379 454 463 451 415 435 397 357 211 188 145 13069 27 18 14 16 35 72 145 292 388 367 417 393 436 422 488 516 523 496 459 269 253 178 105 6398 523 1764 50 20 16 14 25 56 130 217 366 387 440 467 462 488 451 478 502 431 376 245 148 96 44 5973 502 1719 16 8 9 36 101 283 523 506 374 372 333 346 327 396 430 396 406 356 248 152 108 70 36 5851 523 719 5 9 7 24 90 305 537 478 398 345 317 304 333 342 374 434 396 350 245 134 119 79 57 5701 537 721 12 12 11 26 83 289 528 502 370 375 359

AVERAGE WEEKDAY HOURS (Axle Factored, Mon 6AM to Fri Noon) ADT19 8 10 9 24 83 281 509 476 367 342 334 313 317 355 387 399 386 340 237 138 110 71 44 5559

DAYSCounted

6

HOURSCounted

122

WEEKDAYSCounted

3

WEEKDAYHours

56

AVERAGE WEEKDAYHigh Hour

509

% of day

9%

Axle Adj.Factor

0.962

Seasonal/WeekdayAdjustment Factor

1.073

ESTIMATED (one way)

AADT5181

ROUTE #: NY 299 ROAD NAME: RT 299 FROM: SPRINGTOWN RD TO: RT 208 START RT 32 OLAP COUNTY: UlsterSTATION: 860573 STATE DIR CODE: 1 PLACEMENT: 50 Ft. E of Huguenot St. DATE OF COUNT: 09/18/2009

Page 157: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

STATION: 860573 New York State Department of TransportationTraffic Count Hourly Report

Page 2 of 2

ROUTE #: NY 299 ROAD NAME: RT 299 FROM: SPRINGTOWN RD TO: RT 208 START RT 32 OLAP COUNTY: UlsterDIRECTION: Westbound FACTOR GROUP: 30 REC. SERIAL #: 0023 FUNC. CLASS: 02 VILLAGE: NEW PALTZSTATE DIR CODE: 2 WK OF YR: 38 PLACEMENT: 50 Ft. E of Huguenot St. NHS: no LION#:DATE OF COUNT: 09/18/2009 @ REF MARKER: 299 86011025 JURIS: Village BIN: 3045230NOTES LANE 1: Week 37 West Bound ADDL DATA: CC Stn: RR CROSSING:

COUNT TYPE: AXLE PAIRS BATCH ID: R08-R08cww37b HPMS SAMPLE: COUNT TAKEN BY: ORG CODE: TST INITIALS: --- PROCESSED BY: ORG CODE: DOT INITIALS: jh

12TO1

1TO2

2TO3

3TO4

4TO5

5TO6

6TO7

7TO8

8TO9

9TO10

10TO11

11TO12

12TO1

1TO2

2TO3

3TO4

4TO5

5TO6

6TO7

7TO8

8TO9

9TO10

10TO11

11TO12

DAILY DAILYDAILY HIGH HIGH

AM PMDATE DAY TOTAL COUNT HOUR1 T2 W3 T4 F5 S6 S7 M8 T9 W

10 T11 F12 S13 S14 M15 T16 W17 T18 F19 S20 S21 M22 T23 W24 T25 F26 S27 S28 M29 T30 W

339 382 457 455 507 533 614 609 523 409 376 311 233 16576 56 51 15 22 24 42 136 253 388 528 562 589 667 574 619 567 472 444 357 300 264 196 127 7329 667 1385 53 45 20 29 24 46 96 234 367 432 577 672 642 572 497 481 441 363 269 207 151 101 55 6459 672 1231 12 13 9 9 37 115 207 261 333 333 358 441 375 390 513 523 571 459 363 248 196 141 52 5990 571 1730 20 13 12 8 33 119 204 263 310 317 350 413 386 382 489 549 518 431 383 280 273 127 79 5989 549 1632 23 9 10 17 26 122 216 250 317 299 323

AVERAGE WEEKDAY HOURS (Axle Factored, Mon 6AM to Fri Noon) ADT30 21 11 11 12 29 114 201 248 308 310 340 411 366 371 482 516 523 428 359 254 225 129 63 5762

DAYSCounted

6

HOURSCounted

122

WEEKDAYSCounted

3

WEEKDAYHours

56

AVERAGE WEEKDAYHigh Hour

523

% of day

9%

Axle Adj.Factor

0.962

Seasonal/WeekdayAdjustment Factor

1.073

ESTIMATED (one way)

AADT5370

ROUTE #: NY 299 ROAD NAME: RT 299 FROM: SPRINGTOWN RD TO: RT 208 START RT 32 OLAP COUNTY: UlsterSTATION: 860573 STATE DIR CODE: 2 PLACEMENT: 50 Ft. E of Huguenot St. DATE OF COUNT: 09/18/2009

Page 158: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

80

Appendix D: Accident Data

Page 159: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

06/06/12 16:53Page: 1Accident Verbal Description Report

Program: sass1702 NYSDOT Safety Information Management System Date:

Intersection & Non-Intersection AccidentsComplete Accident Data From NYSDMV Is Only Available thru 31-DEC-2011

Route: 299 Highway Location Ref Mrkr Range: 299 86011058 - 299 86011060 Dates: 01-JAN-2009 - 31-DEC-2011 **** WARNING **** AT LEAST 1 REFERENCE MARKER WAS NOT ACTIVE FOR THE ENTIRE DATE RANGE REQUESTED. *** Ref Mrkr: 299 8601 1058 NON-INTERSECTION ACCIDENTS *** JUL-22-2011 FRI 06:20 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 1 Extent of Injuries: C Case: 2011-33953028 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE AND INJURY Police Agency:NEW PALTZ EMERGENCY COMM PD Num of Veh: 1 Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH GUIDERAIL - END Traffic Control: NO PASSING ZONE Manner of Collision: OTHER Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Collision: DRY Road Char: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3118 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 38 Sex: FEMALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: ILLNESS NOT APPLICABLE AUG-03-2011 WED 10:35 AM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2011-33973381 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE Police Agency:NEW PALTZ EMERGENCY COMM PD Num of Veh: 3 Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: NO PASSING ZONE Manner of Collision: OTHER Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Collision: DRY Road Char: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 2877 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 38 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: SLOWED OR STOPPING Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3278 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 24 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: YES Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: BRAKES DEFECTIVE FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY Veh: 3 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: PA Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 52 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: WEST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE *** Ref Mrkr: 299 8601 1058 INTERSECTION ACCIDENTS - WATER ST/HUGUENOT ST/NY 32 2 *** OCT-23-2009 FRI 03:46 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 1 Extent of Injuries: C Case: 2009-33184266

Page 160: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

06/06/12 16:53Page: 2Accident Verbal Description Report

Program: sass1702 NYSDOT Safety Information Management System Date:

Intersection & Non-Intersection AccidentsComplete Accident Data From NYSDMV Is Only Available thru 31-DEC-2011

Route: 299 Highway Location Ref Mrkr Range: 299 86011058 - 299 86011060 Dates: 01-JAN-2009 - 31-DEC-2011 *** Ref Mrkr: 299 8601 1058 INTERSECTION ACCIDENTS - WATER ST/HUGUENOT ST/NY 32 2 *** (Continued) Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE AND INJURY Police Agency:NEW PALTZ EMERGENCY COMM PD Num of Veh: 2 Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: TRAFFIC SIGNAL Manner of Collision: RIGHT ANGLE Weather: CLOUDY Road Surface Collision: DRY Road Char: STRAIGHT/ GRADE Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3042 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 60 Sex: FEMALE Citation Issued: YES Direction of Travel: NORTH-EAST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: MAKING LEFT TURN Apparent Factors: FAILURE TO YIELD RIGHT OF WAY VIEW OBSTRUCTED/LIMITED Veh: 2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 2432 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 59 Sex: FEMALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE DEC-13-2009 SUN 01:30 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2009-33258686 Accident Class: NON-REPORTABLE Police Agency:NYSP HIGHLAND Num of Veh: 2 Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: NONE Manner of Collision: REAR END Weather: SLEET/HAIL/FREEZING RAIN Road Surface Collision: SNOW/ICE Road Char: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 22 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: UNSAFE SPEED NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 59 Sex: FEMALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE JAN-16-2011 SUN 02:46 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2011-33735120 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE Police Agency:NEW PALTZ EMERGENCY COMM PD Num of Veh: 2 Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: STOP SIGN Manner of Collision: RIGHT ANGLE Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Collision: DRY Road Char: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE

Page 161: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

06/06/12 16:53Page: 3Accident Verbal Description Report

Program: sass1702 NYSDOT Safety Information Management System Date:

Intersection & Non-Intersection AccidentsComplete Accident Data From NYSDMV Is Only Available thru 31-DEC-2011

Route: 299 Highway Location Ref Mrkr Range: 299 86011058 - 299 86011060 Dates: 01-JAN-2009 - 31-DEC-2011 *** Ref Mrkr: 299 8601 1058 INTERSECTION ACCIDENTS - WATER ST/HUGUENOT ST/NY 32 2 *** (Continued) Veh: 1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3200 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 2 Drivers Age: 20 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: SOUTH Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: FAILURE TO YIELD RIGHT OF WAY VIEW OBSTRUCTED/LIMITED Veh: 2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: NJ Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 48 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE FEB-13-2011 SUN 06:49 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2011-33773197 Accident Class: NON-REPORTABLE Police Agency:NEW PALTZ EMERGENCY COMM PD Num of Veh: 2 Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: STOP SIGN Manner of Collision: LEFT TURN (WITH OTHER CAR) Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Collision: DRY Road Char: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DARK-ROAD LIGHTED Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 28 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: SOUTH-EAST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: MAKING LEFT TURN Apparent Factors: DRIVER INATTENTION NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 64 Sex: FEMALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: NORTH-WEST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: MAKING LEFT TURN Apparent Factors: DRIVER INATTENTION NOT APPLICABLE JUL-07-2011 THU 09:53 AM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 1 Extent of Injuries: C Case: 2011-33935561 Accident Class: INJURY Police Agency:NEW PALTZ EMERGENCY COMM PD Num of Veh: 2 Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: STOP SIGN Manner of Collision: RIGHT ANGLE Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Collision: DRY Road Char: CURVE AND GRADE Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 2453 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 65 Sex: FEMALE Citation Issued: YES Direction of Travel: NORTH Public Property Damage: YES School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD

Page 162: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

06/06/12 16:53Page: 4Accident Verbal Description Report

Program: sass1702 NYSDOT Safety Information Management System Date:

Intersection & Non-Intersection AccidentsComplete Accident Data From NYSDMV Is Only Available thru 31-DEC-2011

Route: 299 Highway Location Ref Mrkr Range: 299 86011058 - 299 86011060 Dates: 01-JAN-2009 - 31-DEC-2011 *** Ref Mrkr: 299 8601 1058 INTERSECTION ACCIDENTS - WATER ST/HUGUENOT ST/NY 32 2 *** (Continued) Apparent Factors: FAILURE TO YIELD RIGHT OF WAY DRIVER INATTENTION Veh: 2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 2070 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 19 Sex: FEMALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: WEST Public Property Damage: YES School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE JUL-08-2011 FRI 04:40 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 2 Extent of Injuries: BC Case: 2011-33940852 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE AND INJURY Police Agency:NEW PALTZ EMERGENCY COMM PD Num of Veh: 2 Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: STOP SIGN Manner of Collision: HEAD ON Weather: RAIN Road Surface Collision: WET Road Char: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 2756 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 2 Drivers Age: 21 Sex: FEMALE Citation Issued: YES Direction of Travel: NORTH Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: FAILURE TO YIELD RIGHT OF WAY NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3457 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 60 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: WEST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE *** Ref Mrkr: 299 8601 1059 NON-INTERSECTION ACCIDENTS *** MAR-18-2009 WED 08:57 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2009-32955615 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE Police Agency:NEW PALTZ EMERGENCY COMM PD Num of Veh: 1 Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH OTHER Traffic Control: NO PASSING ZONE Manner of Collision: OTHER Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Collision: DRY Road Char: STRAIGHT/ GRADE Light Condition: DARK-ROAD LIGHTED Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 27 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: OBSTRUCTION/DEBRIS NOT APPLICABLE APR-18-2009 SAT 03:49 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2009-32989175

Page 163: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

06/06/12 16:53Page: 5Accident Verbal Description Report

Program: sass1702 NYSDOT Safety Information Management System Date:

Intersection & Non-Intersection AccidentsComplete Accident Data From NYSDMV Is Only Available thru 31-DEC-2011

Route: 299 Highway Location Ref Mrkr Range: 299 86011058 - 299 86011060 Dates: 01-JAN-2009 - 31-DEC-2011 *** Ref Mrkr: 299 8601 1059 NON-INTERSECTION ACCIDENTS *** (Continued) Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE Police Agency:NEW PALTZ EMERGENCY COMM PD Num of Veh: 2 Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: NO PASSING ZONE Manner of Collision: RIGHT ANGLE Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Collision: DRY Road Char: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: NJ Num of Occupants: 2 Drivers Age: 47 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: SOUTH Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: BACKING Apparent Factors: DRIVER INATTENTION BACKING UNSAFELY Veh: 2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3516 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: UNKNOWN Sex: UNKNOWN Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: PARKED Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE APR-25-2009 SAT 04:30 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2009-32996049 Accident Class: NON-REPORTABLE Police Agency:NEW PALTZ EMERGENCY COMM PD Num of Veh: 2 Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: NONE Manner of Collision: RIGHT TURN (WITH OTHER CAR) Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Collision: DRY Road Char: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 1 OTHER Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 2 Drivers Age: UNKNOWN Sex: UNKNOWN Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: WEST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: PARKED Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 34 Sex: FEMALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: WEST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: MAKING RIGHT TURN Apparent Factors: TURNING IMPROPER NOT APPLICABLE SEP-12-2009 SAT 10:11 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2009-33133515 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE Police Agency:NEW PALTZ EMERGENCY COMM PD Num of Veh: 3 Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: NO PASSING ZONE Manner of Collision: OTHER Weather: CLOUDY Road Surface Collision: DRY Road Char: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DARK-ROAD LIGHTED Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE

Page 164: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

06/06/12 16:53Page: 6Accident Verbal Description Report

Program: sass1702 NYSDOT Safety Information Management System Date:

Intersection & Non-Intersection AccidentsComplete Accident Data From NYSDMV Is Only Available thru 31-DEC-2011

Route: 299 Highway Location Ref Mrkr Range: 299 86011058 - 299 86011060 Dates: 01-JAN-2009 - 31-DEC-2011 *** Ref Mrkr: 299 8601 1059 NON-INTERSECTION ACCIDENTS *** (Continued) Veh: 1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3417 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 21 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: YES Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: ALCOHOL INVOLVEMENT NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: KS Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: UNKNOWN Sex: UNKNOWN Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: PARKED Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 3 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 2870 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: UNKNOWN Sex: UNKNOWN Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: PARKED Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE OCT-23-2010 SAT 12:53 AM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2010-33622320 Accident Class: NON-REPORTABLE Police Agency:NEW PALTZ EMERGENCY COMM PD Num of Veh: 2 Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: NONE Manner of Collision: RIGHT ANGLE Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Collision: DRY Road Char: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DARK-ROAD LIGHTED Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 2 Drivers Age: UNKNOWN Sex: UNKNOWN Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: SOUTH Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: PARKED Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 2 Drivers Age: 18 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: SOUTH Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: BACKING Apparent Factors: BACKING UNSAFELY NOT APPLICABLE JUN-03-2011 FRI 05:01 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2011-33899435 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE Police Agency:NEW PALTZ EMERGENCY COMM PD Num of Veh: 1 Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH TREE Traffic Control: NO PASSING ZONE Manner of Collision: OTHER Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Collision: DRY Road Char: STRAIGHT/ GRADE Light Condition: DAYLIGHT

Page 165: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

06/06/12 16:53Page: 7Accident Verbal Description Report

Program: sass1702 NYSDOT Safety Information Management System Date:

Intersection & Non-Intersection AccidentsComplete Accident Data From NYSDMV Is Only Available thru 31-DEC-2011

Route: 299 Highway Location Ref Mrkr Range: 299 86011058 - 299 86011060 Dates: 01-JAN-2009 - 31-DEC-2011 *** Ref Mrkr: 299 8601 1059 NON-INTERSECTION ACCIDENTS *** (Continued) Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3533 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 56 Sex: FEMALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: WEST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: AVOIDING OBJECT IN ROADWAY Apparent Factors: BRAKES DEFECTIVE NOT APPLICABLE *** Ref Mrkr: 299 8601 1059 INTERSECTION ACCIDENTS - WURTS AVE 2 *** MAY-26-2011 THU 10:38 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2011-33891003 Accident Class: NON-REPORTABLE Police Agency:NEW PALTZ EMERGENCY COMM PD Num of Veh: 1 Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH OTHER FIXED OBJECT Traffic Control: NONE Manner of Collision: OTHER Weather: CLOUDY Road Surface Collision: DRY Road Char: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DARK-ROAD LIGHTED Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 30 Sex: FEMALE Citation Issued: YES Direction of Travel: NORTH Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: ALCOHOL INVOLVEMENT NOT APPLICABLE *** Ref Mrkr: 299 8601 1060 NON-INTERSECTION ACCIDENTS *** JAN-16-2009 FRI 11:02 AM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2009-32876005 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE Police Agency:NEW PALTZ EMERGENCY COMM PD Num of Veh: 2 Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: NO PASSING ZONE Manner of Collision: RIGHT ANGLE Weather: CLOUDY Road Surface Collision: DRY Road Char: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3735 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 50 Sex: FEMALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: NORTH-WEST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: BACKING Apparent Factors: BACKING UNSAFELY NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 2912 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 68 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: SOUTH Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE

Page 166: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

06/06/12 16:53Page: 8Accident Verbal Description Report

Program: sass1702 NYSDOT Safety Information Management System Date:

Intersection & Non-Intersection AccidentsComplete Accident Data From NYSDMV Is Only Available thru 31-DEC-2011

Route: 299 Highway Location Ref Mrkr Range: 299 86011058 - 299 86011060 Dates: 01-JAN-2009 - 31-DEC-2011 MAR-07-2009 SAT 04:10 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2009-32959559 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE Police Agency:NEW PALTZ EMERGENCY COMM PD Num of Veh: 2 Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: NONE Manner of Collision: LEFT TURN (AGAINST OTHER CAR) Weather: CLOUDY Road Surface Collision: DRY Road Char: CURVE AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3888 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 2 Drivers Age: 44 Sex: FEMALE Citation Issued: YES Direction of Travel: SOUTH Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: BACKING Apparent Factors: BACKING UNSAFELY NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3938 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 2 Drivers Age: 18 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: NORTH-WEST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: MAKING LEFT TURN Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE MAR-09-2009 MON 03:33 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2009-32948093 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE Police Agency:NEW PALTZ EMERGENCY COMM PD Num of Veh: 2 Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: NONE Manner of Collision: RIGHT ANGLE Weather: RAIN Road Surface Collision: WET Road Char: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 4337 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 21 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: SOUTH Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: STARTING IN TRAFFIC Apparent Factors: FAILURE TO YIELD RIGHT OF WAY NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: NJ Num of Occupants: 2 Drivers Age: 65 Sex: FEMALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: WEST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE NOV-19-2009 THU 12:55 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2009-33215760 Accident Class: NON-REPORTABLE Police Agency:NEW PALTZ EMERGENCY COMM PD Num of Veh: 2 Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: TRAFFIC SIGNAL Manner of Collision: REAR END Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Collision: DRY Road Char: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE

Page 167: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

06/06/12 16:53Page: 9Accident Verbal Description Report

Program: sass1702 NYSDOT Safety Information Management System Date:

Intersection & Non-Intersection AccidentsComplete Accident Data From NYSDMV Is Only Available thru 31-DEC-2011

Route: 299 Highway Location Ref Mrkr Range: 299 86011058 - 299 86011060 Dates: 01-JAN-2009 - 31-DEC-2011 *** Ref Mrkr: 299 8601 1060 NON-INTERSECTION ACCIDENTS *** (Continued) Veh: 1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 24 Sex: FEMALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: STOPPED IN TRAFFIC Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 37 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY NOT APPLICABLE NOV-25-2009 WED 01:17 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2009-33225704 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE Police Agency:NEW PALTZ EMERGENCY COMM PD Num of Veh: 2 Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: NONE Manner of Collision: LEFT TURN (AGAINST OTHER CAR) Weather: RAIN Road Surface Collision: WET Road Char: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3195 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 2 Drivers Age: 61 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3541 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 72 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: SOUTH-EAST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: MAKING LEFT TURN Apparent Factors: TURNING IMPROPER NOT APPLICABLE JAN-22-2010 FRI 10:25 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2010-33310088 Accident Class: NON-REPORTABLE Police Agency:NEW PALTZ EMERGENCY COMM PD Num of Veh: 2 Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: NO PASSING ZONE Manner of Collision: LEFT TURN (AGAINST OTHER CAR) Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Collision: DRY Road Char: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DARK-ROAD LIGHTED Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 58 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: CHANGING LANES

Page 168: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

06/06/12 16:53Page: 10Accident Verbal Description Report

Program: sass1702 NYSDOT Safety Information Management System Date:

Intersection & Non-Intersection AccidentsComplete Accident Data From NYSDMV Is Only Available thru 31-DEC-2011

Route: 299 Highway Location Ref Mrkr Range: 299 86011058 - 299 86011060 Dates: 01-JAN-2009 - 31-DEC-2011 *** Ref Mrkr: 299 8601 1060 NON-INTERSECTION ACCIDENTS *** (Continued) Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 22 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: SOUTH-EAST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: MAKING LEFT TURN Apparent Factors: FAILURE TO YIELD RIGHT OF WAY NOT APPLICABLE SEP-15-2010 WED 05:16 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2010-33577342 Accident Class: NON-REPORTABLE Police Agency:NEW PALTZ EMERGENCY COMM PD Num of Veh: 2 Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: NO PASSING ZONE Manner of Collision: OVERTAKING Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Collision: DRY Road Char: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: AZ Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 23 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: YES Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: ENTERING PARKED POSITION Apparent Factors: DRIVER INATTENTION NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 2 Drivers Age: UNKNOWN Sex: UNKNOWN Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: PARKED Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE JAN-29-2011 SAT 03:00 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 1 Extent of Injuries: C Case: 2011-33749854 Accident Class: INJURY Police Agency:NEW PALTZ EMERGENCY COMM PD Num of Veh: 1 Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH PEDESTRIAN Traffic Control: OTHER Manner of Collision: OTHER Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Collision: WET Road Char: STRAIGHT/ GRADE Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: PED/BICYCLIST NOT AT INTERSECTION Action of Ped/Bicycle: WORKING IN ROADWAY Veh: 1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 2 Drivers Age: 43 Sex: FEMALE Citation Issued: YES Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: MERGING Apparent Factors: AGGRESSIVE DRIVING/ROAD RAGE NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 2 PEDESTRIAN Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: UNKNOWN Num of Occupants: N/A Pedestrian Age: 54 Sex: FEMALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: NOT APPLICABLE Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO

Page 169: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

06/06/12 16:53Page: 11Accident Verbal Description Report

Program: sass1702 NYSDOT Safety Information Management System Date:

Intersection & Non-Intersection AccidentsComplete Accident Data From NYSDMV Is Only Available thru 31-DEC-2011

Route: 299 Highway Location Ref Mrkr Range: 299 86011058 - 299 86011060 Dates: 01-JAN-2009 - 31-DEC-2011 *** Ref Mrkr: 299 8601 1060 NON-INTERSECTION ACCIDENTS *** (Continued) Pre-Accd Action: NOT APPLICABLE Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE APR-30-2011 SAT 06:15 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2011-33865208 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE Police Agency:ULSTER CO SHERIFF DEPT Num of Veh: 2 Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: NONE Manner of Collision: RIGHT ANGLE Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Collision: DRY Road Char: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3075 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 30 Sex: FEMALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: SOUTH Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: MAKING LEFT TURN Apparent Factors: FAILURE TO YIELD RIGHT OF WAY NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3825 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 2 Drivers Age: 48 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: WEST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: PASSING OR LANE USAGE IMPROPERLY NOT APPLICABLE MAY-13-2011 FRI 10:45 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2011-33878710 Accident Class: NON-REPORTABLE Police Agency:NEW PALTZ EMERGENCY COMM PD Num of Veh: 3 Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: NONE Manner of Collision: OTHER Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Collision: DRY Road Char: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DARK-ROAD LIGHTED Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: NJ Num of Occupants: 5 Drivers Age: 27 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: STARTING FROM PARKING Apparent Factors: DRIVER INEXPERIENCE NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 2 TRUCK Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: CA Num of Occupants: 2 Drivers Age: UNKNOWN Sex: UNKNOWN Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: PARKED Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE Truck/Bus Clsf: NOT ENTERED Veh: 3 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: NY

Page 170: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

06/06/12 16:53Page: 12Accident Verbal Description Report

Program: sass1702 NYSDOT Safety Information Management System Date:

Intersection & Non-Intersection AccidentsComplete Accident Data From NYSDMV Is Only Available thru 31-DEC-2011

Route: 299 Highway Location Ref Mrkr Range: 299 86011058 - 299 86011060 Dates: 01-JAN-2009 - 31-DEC-2011 *** Ref Mrkr: 299 8601 1060 NON-INTERSECTION ACCIDENTS *** (Continued) Num of Occupants: 2 Drivers Age: UNKNOWN Sex: UNKNOWN Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: PARKED Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE MAY-31-2011 TUE 01:17 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2011-33894606 Accident Class: NON-REPORTABLE Police Agency:NEW PALTZ EMERGENCY COMM PD Num of Veh: 2 Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: NONE Manner of Collision: RIGHT ANGLE Weather: CLOUDY Road Surface Collision: DRY Road Char: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 39 Sex: FEMALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: SOUTH Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: MAKING LEFT TURN Apparent Factors: DRIVER INATTENTION NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 21 Sex: FEMALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: WEST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE JUL-28-2011 THU 08:49 AM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2011-33962734 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE Police Agency:NEW PALTZ EMERGENCY COMM PD Num of Veh: 2 Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: NONE Manner of Collision: LEFT TURN (AGAINST OTHER CAR) Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Collision: DRY Road Char: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 2834 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 50 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: SOUTH Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: MAKING LEFT TURN Apparent Factors: FAILURE TO YIELD RIGHT OF WAY NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 2451 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 41 Sex: FEMALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE

Page 171: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

06/06/12 16:53Page: 13Accident Verbal Description Report

Program: sass1702 NYSDOT Safety Information Management System Date:

Intersection & Non-Intersection AccidentsComplete Accident Data From NYSDMV Is Only Available thru 31-DEC-2011

Route: 299 Highway Location Ref Mrkr Range: 299 86011058 - 299 86011060 Dates: 01-JAN-2009 - 31-DEC-2011 *** Ref Mrkr: 32 8602 1119 INTERSECTION ACCIDENTS - JCT NY 208 S.CHESTNUT ST *** JAN-16-2009 FRI 11:22 AM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 1 Extent of Injuries: C Case: 2009-32876008 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE AND INJURY Police Agency:NEW PALTZ EMERGENCY COMM PD Num of Veh: 2 Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: TRAFFIC SIGNAL Manner of Collision: RIGHT TURN (WITH OTHER CAR) Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Collision: WET Road Char: STRAIGHT/ GRADE Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3184 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 39 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: YES Direction of Travel: WEST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: FAILURE TO YIELD RIGHT OF WAY NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 2 TRUCK Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: IN Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 45 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: NORTH-WEST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: MAKING RIGHT TURN Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE Truck/Bus Clsf: NOT ENTERED MAR-06-2009 FRI 02:46 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2009-32941547 Accident Class: NON-REPORTABLE Police Agency:NEW PALTZ EMERGENCY COMM PD Num of Veh: 2 Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: TRAFFIC SIGNAL Manner of Collision: REAR END Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Collision: DRY Road Char: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 1 BUS Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 58 Sex: FEMALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: NORTH Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY NOT APPLICABLE Truck/Bus Clsf: NOT ENTERED Veh: 2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 20 Drivers Age: 29 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: NORTH Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: STOPPED IN TRAFFIC Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE MAY-30-2009 SAT 07:25 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 1 Extent of Injuries: B Case: 2009-33030922 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE AND INJURY Police Agency:NEW PALTZ EMERGENCY COMM PD Num of Veh: 1 Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH PEDESTRIAN Traffic Control: TRAFFIC SIGNAL

Page 172: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

06/06/12 16:53Page: 14Accident Verbal Description Report

Program: sass1702 NYSDOT Safety Information Management System Date:

Intersection & Non-Intersection AccidentsComplete Accident Data From NYSDMV Is Only Available thru 31-DEC-2011

Route: 299 Highway Location Ref Mrkr Range: 299 86011058 - 299 86011060 Dates: 01-JAN-2009 - 31-DEC-2011 *** Ref Mrkr: 32 8602 1119 INTERSECTION ACCIDENTS - JCT NY 208 S.CHESTNUT ST *** (Continued) Manner of Collision: OTHER Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Collision: DRY Road Char: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: PED/BICYCLIST NOT AT INTERSECTION Action of Ped/Bicycle: CROSSING AGAINST SIGNAL Veh: 1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3050 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 2 Drivers Age: 50 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: SOUTH-EAST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: MAKING RIGHT TURN Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 2 PEDESTRIAN Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: UNKNOWN Num of Occupants: N/A Pedestrian Age: 70 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: NOT APPLICABLE Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: NOT APPLICABLE Apparent Factors: PEDESTRIAN'S ERROR/CONFUSION NOT APPLICABLE AUG-11-2009 TUE 09:55 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2009-33108309 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE Police Agency:ULSTER CO SHERIFF DEPT Num of Veh: 2 Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: TRAFFIC SIGNAL Manner of Collision: LEFT TURN (AGAINST OTHER CAR) Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Collision: DRY Road Char: STRAIGHT/ GRADE Light Condition: DARK-ROAD LIGHTED Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: MS Num of Occupants: 5 Drivers Age: 21 Sex: FEMALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: MAKING LEFT TURN Apparent Factors: FAILURE TO KEEP RIGHT NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3382 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 30 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: WEST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: STOPPED IN TRAFFIC Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE NOV-28-2009 SAT 10:50 AM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2009-33225707 Accident Class: NON-REPORTABLE Police Agency:NEW PALTZ EMERGENCY COMM PD Num of Veh: 2 Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: TRAFFIC SIGNAL Manner of Collision: OVERTAKING Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Collision: DRY Road Char: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 1 BUS Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: NY

Page 173: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

06/06/12 16:53Page: 15Accident Verbal Description Report

Program: sass1702 NYSDOT Safety Information Management System Date:

Intersection & Non-Intersection AccidentsComplete Accident Data From NYSDMV Is Only Available thru 31-DEC-2011

Route: 299 Highway Location Ref Mrkr Range: 299 86011058 - 299 86011060 Dates: 01-JAN-2009 - 31-DEC-2011 *** Ref Mrkr: 32 8602 1119 INTERSECTION ACCIDENTS - JCT NY 208 S.CHESTNUT ST *** (Continued) Num of Occupants: 2 Drivers Age: 57 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: SOUTH Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: STOPPED IN TRAFFIC Apparent Factors: PASSING OR LANE USAGE IMPROPERLY NOT APPLICABLE Truck/Bus Clsf: NOT ENTERED Veh: 2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 44 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: SOUTH Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: MAKING RIGHT TURN Apparent Factors: PASSING OR LANE USAGE IMPROPERLY NOT APPLICABLE OCT-22-2010 FRI 09:54 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2010-33628378 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE Police Agency:NEW PALTZ EMERGENCY COMM PD Num of Veh: 2 Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: NO PASSING ZONE Manner of Collision: REAR END Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Collision: DRY Road Char: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DARK-ROAD LIGHTED Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 4046 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 43 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: STOPPED IN TRAFFIC Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 2 OTHER Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: UNKNOWN Drivers Age: UNKNOWN Sex: UNKNOWN Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY NOT APPLICABLE OCT-29-2010 FRI 08:50 AM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 1 Extent of Injuries: C Case: 2010-33635352 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE AND INJURY Police Agency:NEW PALTZ EMERGENCY COMM PD Num of Veh: 2 Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: TRAFFIC SIGNAL Manner of Collision: REAR END Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Collision: DRY Road Char: STRAIGHT/ GRADE Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3638 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 63 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: REACTION TO OTHER UNINVOLVED VEHICL NOT APPLICABLE

Page 174: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

06/06/12 16:53Page: 16Accident Verbal Description Report

Program: sass1702 NYSDOT Safety Information Management System Date:

Intersection & Non-Intersection AccidentsComplete Accident Data From NYSDMV Is Only Available thru 31-DEC-2011

Route: 299 Highway Location Ref Mrkr Range: 299 86011058 - 299 86011060 Dates: 01-JAN-2009 - 31-DEC-2011 *** Ref Mrkr: 32 8602 1119 INTERSECTION ACCIDENTS - JCT NY 208 S.CHESTNUT ST *** (Continued) Veh: 2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3230 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 78 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: REACTION TO OTHER UNINVOLVED VEHICL NOT APPLICABLE APR-20-2011 WED 12:28 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2011-33851399 Accident Class: NON-REPORTABLE Police Agency:NEW PALTZ EMERGENCY COMM PD Num of Veh: 2 Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: TRAFFIC SIGNAL Manner of Collision: SIDESWIPE Weather: RAIN Road Surface Collision: WET Road Char: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 2 Drivers Age: 37 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: NORTH Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 2 TRUCK Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 21 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: SOUTH Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: MAKING RIGHT TURN Apparent Factors: VIEW OBSTRUCTED/LIMITED NOT APPLICABLE Truck/Bus Clsf: NOT ENTERED MAY-20-2011 FRI 06:06 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2011-33880811 Accident Class: NON-REPORTABLE Police Agency:NEW PALTZ EMERGENCY COMM PD Num of Veh: 2 Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: TRAFFIC SIGNAL Manner of Collision: OVERTAKING Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Collision: DRY Road Char: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 56 Sex: FEMALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: SOUTH Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: STOPPED IN TRAFFIC Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 3 Drivers Age: 19 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: SOUTH Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO

Page 175: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

06/06/12 16:53Page: 17Accident Verbal Description Report

Program: sass1702 NYSDOT Safety Information Management System Date:

Intersection & Non-Intersection AccidentsComplete Accident Data From NYSDMV Is Only Available thru 31-DEC-2011

Route: 299 Highway Location Ref Mrkr Range: 299 86011058 - 299 86011060 Dates: 01-JAN-2009 - 31-DEC-2011 *** Ref Mrkr: 32 8602 1119 INTERSECTION ACCIDENTS - JCT NY 208 S.CHESTNUT ST *** (Continued) Pre-Accd Action: SLOWED OR STOPPING Apparent Factors: FAILURE TO KEEP RIGHT REACTION TO OTHER UNINVOLVED VEHICL MAY-30-2011 MON 12:43 AM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2011-34011324 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE Police Agency:NOT ENTERED Num of Veh: 2 Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: STOP SIGN Manner of Collision: UNKNOWN Weather: OTHER Road Surface Collision: DRY Road Char: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: UNKNOWN Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 2413 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 19 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: BACKING Apparent Factors: UNKNOWN UNKNOWN Veh: 2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 2884 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 17 Sex: FEMALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: OTHER Apparent Factors: UNKNOWN UNKNOWN JUN-18-2011 SAT 05:24 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2011-33926804 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE Police Agency:UNIV POLICE SUNY NEW PALTZ Num of Veh: 2 Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: TRAFFIC SIGNAL Manner of Collision: OVERTAKING Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Collision: DRY Road Char: STRAIGHT/ GRADE Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 2911 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 59 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: NORTH Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: STOPPED IN TRAFFIC Apparent Factors: OTHER (VEHICLE) UNSAFE LANE CHANGE Veh: 2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3110 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 50 Sex: FEMALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: NORTH Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: CHANGING LANES Apparent Factors: UNSAFE LANE CHANGE UNKNOWN JUN-27-2011 MON 09:14 AM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2011-33927008 Accident Class: NON-REPORTABLE Police Agency:NEW PALTZ EMERGENCY COMM PD Num of Veh: 2

Page 176: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

06/06/12 16:53Page: 18Accident Verbal Description Report

Program: sass1702 NYSDOT Safety Information Management System Date:

Intersection & Non-Intersection AccidentsComplete Accident Data From NYSDMV Is Only Available thru 31-DEC-2011

Route: 299 Highway Location Ref Mrkr Range: 299 86011058 - 299 86011060 Dates: 01-JAN-2009 - 31-DEC-2011 *** Ref Mrkr: 32 8602 1119 INTERSECTION ACCIDENTS - JCT NY 208 S.CHESTNUT ST *** (Continued) Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: TRAFFIC SIGNAL Manner of Collision: LEFT TURN (AGAINST OTHER CAR) Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Collision: DRY Road Char: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 52 Sex: FEMALE Citation Issued: YES Direction of Travel: NORTH Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 2 TRUCK Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: PA Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 59 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: YES Direction of Travel: SOUTH-EAST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: MAKING LEFT TURN Apparent Factors: FAILURE TO YIELD RIGHT OF WAY DRIVER INATTENTION Truck/Bus Clsf: NOT ENTERED JUL-12-2011 TUE 04:34 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2011-33949521 Accident Class: NON-REPORTABLE Police Agency:NEW PALTZ EMERGENCY COMM PD Num of Veh: 2 Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: TRAFFIC SIGNAL Manner of Collision: OVERTAKING Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Collision: DRY Road Char: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 1 TRUCK Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 53 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: SOUTH Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: MAKING LEFT TURN Apparent Factors: VIEW OBSTRUCTED/LIMITED NOT APPLICABLE Truck/Bus Clsf: NOT ENTERED Veh: 2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 20 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: SOUTH Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: STOPPED IN TRAFFIC Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE SEP-23-2011 FRI 08:06 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2011-34025714 Accident Class: NON-REPORTABLE Police Agency:NEW PALTZ EMERGENCY COMM PD Num of Veh: 2 Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: NONE Manner of Collision: REAR END Weather: RAIN Road Surface Collision: WET Road Char: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DARK-ROAD LIGHTED

Page 177: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

06/06/12 16:53Page: 19Accident Verbal Description Report

Program: sass1702 NYSDOT Safety Information Management System Date:

Intersection & Non-Intersection AccidentsComplete Accident Data From NYSDMV Is Only Available thru 31-DEC-2011

Route: 299 Highway Location Ref Mrkr Range: 299 86011058 - 299 86011060 Dates: 01-JAN-2009 - 31-DEC-2011 *** Ref Mrkr: 32 8602 1119 INTERSECTION ACCIDENTS - JCT NY 208 S.CHESTNUT ST *** (Continued) Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 56 Sex: FEMALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: NORTH Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: STOPPED IN TRAFFIC Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 2 OTHER Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: UNKNOWN Sex: UNKNOWN Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: NORTH Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: DRIVER INATTENTION UNKNOWN OCT-06-2011 THU 03:56 PM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2011-34041370 Accident Class: NON-REPORTABLE Police Agency:NEW PALTZ EMERGENCY COMM PD Num of Veh: 2 Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: TRAFFIC SIGNAL Manner of Collision: OVERTAKING Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Collision: DRY Road Char: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 17 Sex: FEMALE Citation Issued: YES Direction of Travel: SOUTH Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: PASSING OR LANE USAGE IMPROPERLY DRIVER INATTENTION Veh: 2 BUS Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 19 Drivers Age: 50 Sex: FEMALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: SOUTH Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: STOPPED IN TRAFFIC Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE Truck/Bus Clsf: NOT ENTERED OCT-25-2011 TUE 11:55 AM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2011-34066561 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE Police Agency:NEW PALTZ EMERGENCY COMM PD Num of Veh: 2 Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: NONE Manner of Collision: LEFT TURN (AGAINST OTHER CAR) Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Collision: DRY Road Char: STRAIGHT/ GRADE Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 7200 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 61 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: NO

Page 178: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

06/06/12 16:53Page: 20Accident Verbal Description Report

Program: sass1702 NYSDOT Safety Information Management System Date:

Intersection & Non-Intersection AccidentsComplete Accident Data From NYSDMV Is Only Available thru 31-DEC-2011

Route: 299 Highway Location Ref Mrkr Range: 299 86011058 - 299 86011060 Dates: 01-JAN-2009 - 31-DEC-2011 *** Ref Mrkr: 32 8602 1119 INTERSECTION ACCIDENTS - JCT NY 208 S.CHESTNUT ST *** (Continued) Direction of Travel: WEST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: MAKING LEFT TURN Apparent Factors: DRIVER INATTENTION NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3525 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 19 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE NOV-14-2011 MON 08:03 AM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 0 Extent of Injuries: Case: 2011-34095121 Accident Class: NON-REPORTABLE Police Agency:NEW PALTZ EMERGENCY COMM PD Num of Veh: 2 Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: TRAFFIC SIGNAL Manner of Collision: OVERTAKING Weather: CLOUDY Road Surface Collision: DRY Road Char: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DAYLIGHT Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 1 TRUCK Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 48 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: SOUTH Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: FAILURE TO KEEP RIGHT NOT APPLICABLE Truck/Bus Clsf: NOT ENTERED Veh: 2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: UNKNOWN State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 68 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: SOUTH Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: STOPPED IN TRAFFIC Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE NOV-16-2011 WED 01:39 AM Persons Killed: 0 Persons Injured: 1 Extent of Injuries: B Case: 2011-34103490 Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE AND INJURY Police Agency:NEW PALTZ EMERGENCY COMM PD Num of Veh: 2 Type of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: TRAFFIC SIGNAL Manner of Collision: REAR END Weather: CLEAR Road Surface Collision: DRY Road Char: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Light Condition: DARK-ROAD LIGHTED Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Veh: 1 TRUCK Registered Weight: 25500 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 42 Sex: MALE Citation Issued: NO Direction of Travel: NORTH Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: STOPPED IN TRAFFIC Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE Truck/Bus Clsf: NOT ENTERED

Page 179: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

06/06/12 16:53Page: 21Accident Verbal Description Report

Program: sass1702 NYSDOT Safety Information Management System Date:

Intersection & Non-Intersection AccidentsComplete Accident Data From NYSDMV Is Only Available thru 31-DEC-2011

Route: 299 Highway Location Ref Mrkr Range: 299 86011058 - 299 86011060 Dates: 01-JAN-2009 - 31-DEC-2011 *** Ref Mrkr: 32 8602 1119 INTERSECTION ACCIDENTS - JCT NY 208 S.CHESTNUT ST *** (Continued) Veh: 2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3548 State of Registration: NY Num of Occupants: 1 Drivers Age: 19 Sex: FEMALE Citation Issued: YES Direction of Travel: NORTH Public Property Damage: NO School Bus Involved: NO Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD Apparent Factors: ALCOHOL INVOLVEMENT NOT APPLICABLE TOTAL NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS PRINTED: 45 ABSENCE OF REFERENCE MARKERS OR INTERSECTION WITHIN A SPECIFIED ROADWAY SECTION & TIME PERIOD INDICATES NO ACCIDENTS FOUND THE FOLLOWING WERE NOT ACTIVE FOR THE ENTIRE DATE RANGE REQUESTED: Reference Markers Ref Markers/Interesctions----------------- -------------------------299 8601 1058 299 8601 1058 46299 8601 1059 299 8601 1059 47 *** END OF REPORT ***

Page 180: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Accident Location Information System (ALIS) Date:

06/06/12 05:53

Accident Verbal Description Report Page: 1

Data in this report covers the period Jan 01, 2009 - Dec 31, 2011 Complete Accident data from NYSDMV is only available thru 12/31/2011 County: Ulster Muni: New Paltz(V) Ref. Marker: Street: HUGUENOT ST 1 Meters North of Water St

10/23/2009 Fri 15:46 PM

Persons Killed: 0

Persons Injured: 1

Extent of Injuries: C

Case: 2009-33184266

Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE AND INJURY Police Agency: Num of Veh: 2

Type Of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE

Traffic Control: TRAFFIC SIGNAL

Manner of Collision: RIGHT ANGLE Weather: CLOUDY

Road Surface Condition: DRY

Road Char.: STRAIGHT/ GRADE

Light Condition: DAYLIGHT

Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE

Veh :1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3042 State of Registration: NY

Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: 60 Sex: F Citation Issued: Y

Direction of Travel: NORTH-EAST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N

Pre-Accd Action: MAKING LEFT TURN

Apparent Factors: FAILURE TO YIELD RIGHT OF WAY, VIEW OBSTRUCTED/LIMITED

Veh :2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 2432 State of Registration: NY

Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: 59 Sex: F Citation Issued: N

Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N

Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD

Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE, NOT APPLICABLE

County: Ulster Muni: New Paltz(V) Ref. Marker: 299 86011059 Street: STATE HWY 299 AT INTERSECTION WITH WATER ST

12/13/2009 Sun 13:30 PM

Persons Killed: 0

Persons Injured: 0

Extent of Injuries:

Case: 2009-33258686

Accident Class: NON-REPORTABLE Police Agency: Num of Veh: 2

Type Of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: NONE

Manner of Collision: REAR END Weather: SLEET/HAIL/FREEZING RAIN

Road Surface Condition: SNOW/ICE

Road Char.: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL

Light Condition: DAYLIGHT

Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE

Veh :1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: State of Registration: NY

Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: 22 Sex: M Citation Issued: N

Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N

Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD

Apparent Factors: UNSAFE SPEED, NOT APPLICABLE

Veh :2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: State of Registration: NY

Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: 59 Sex: F Citation Issued: N

Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N

Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD

Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE, NOT APPLICABLE

County: Ulster Muni: New Paltz(V) Ref. Marker: Street: WATER ST

6/22/2010 Tue 13:04 PM

Persons Killed: 0

Persons Injured: 0

Extent of Injuries:

Case: 2010-33479752

Accident Class: NON-REPORTABLE Police Agency: Num of Veh: 2

Type Of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: NONE

Manner of Collision: REAR END Weather: CLOUDY

Page 181: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Road Surface Condition: DRY

Road Char.: STRAIGHT/ GRADE

Light Condition: DAYLIGHT

Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE

Page 182: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Accident Location Information System (ALIS) Date:

06/06/12 05:53

Accident Verbal Description Report Page: 2

Data in this report covers the period Jan 01, 2009 - Dec 31, 2011 Complete Accident data from NYSDMV is only available thru 12/31/2011 County: Ulster Muni: New Paltz(V) Ref. Marker: Street: WATER ST ***** CONTINUED Veh :2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: State of Registration: NY

Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: 55 Sex: F Citation Issued: N

Direction of Travel: SOUTH Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N

Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD

Apparent Factors: DRIVER INATTENTION, NOT APPLICABLE

Veh :1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: State of Registration: NY

Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: 29 Sex: F Citation Issued: N

Direction of Travel: SOUTH Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N

Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD

Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE, NOT APPLICABLE

County: Ulster Muni: New Paltz(V) Ref. Marker: Street: WATER ST 32 Meters South of Main St

9/9/2010 Thu 14:45 PM

Persons Killed: 0

Persons Injured: 0

Extent of Injuries:

Case: 2010-33569007

Accident Class: NON-REPORTABLE Police Agency: Num of Veh: 2

Type Of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: NONE

Manner of Collision: SIDESWIPE Weather: CLOUDY

Road Surface Condition: DRY

Road Char.: STRAIGHT/ GRADE

Light Condition: DAYLIGHT

Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE

Veh :2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: State of Registration: NY

Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: Sex: M Citation Issued: N

Direction of Travel: UNKNOWN Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N

Pre-Accd Action: UNKNOWN

Apparent Factors: UNKNOWN, TURNING IMPROPER

Veh :1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: State of Registration: TN

Num of Occupants: 2 Driver's Age: Sex: Citation Issued:

Direction of Travel: SOUTH Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N

Pre-Accd Action: PARKED

Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE, NOT APPLICABLE

County: Ulster Muni: New Paltz(V) Ref. Marker: Street: MAIN ST AT INTERSECTION WITH Water St

2/13/2011 Sun 18:49 PM

Persons Killed: 0

Persons Injured: 0

Extent of Injuries:

Case: 2011-33773197

Accident Class: NON-REPORTABLE Police Agency: Num of Veh: 2

Type Of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: STOP SIGN

Manner of Collision: LEFT TURN (WITH OTHER CAR) Weather: CLEAR

Road Surface Condition: DRY

Road Char.: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL

Light Condition: DARK-ROAD LIGHTED

Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE

Veh :2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: State of Registration: NY

Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: 64 Sex: F Citation Issued: N

Direction of Travel: NORTH-WEST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N

Pre-Accd Action: MAKING LEFT TURN

Page 183: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE, DRIVER INATTENTION

Page 184: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Accident Location Information System (ALIS) Date:

06/06/12 05:53

Accident Verbal Description Report Page: 3

Data in this report covers the period Jan 01, 2009 - Dec 31, 2011 Complete Accident data from NYSDMV is only available thru 12/31/2011 County: Ulster Muni: New Paltz(V) Ref. Marker: Street: MAIN ST ***** CONTINUED Veh :1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: State of Registration: NY

Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: 28 Sex: M Citation Issued: N

Direction of Travel: SOUTH-EAST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N

Pre-Accd Action: MAKING LEFT TURN

Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE, DRIVER INATTENTION

County: Ulster Muni: New Paltz(V) Ref. Marker: 299 86011060 Street: MAIN ST AT INTERSECTION WITH HUGUENOT ST

1/16/2011 Sun 14:46 PM

Persons Killed: 0

Persons Injured: 0

Extent of Injuries:

Case: 2011-33735120

Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE Police Agency: Num of Veh: 2

Type Of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: STOP SIGN

Manner of Collision: RIGHT ANGLE Weather: CLEAR

Road Surface Condition: DRY

Road Char.: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL

Light Condition: DAYLIGHT

Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE

Veh :2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: State of Registration: NJ

Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: 48 Sex: M Citation Issued: N

Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N

Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD

Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE, NOT APPLICABLE

Veh :1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3200 State of Registration: NY

Num of Occupants: 2 Driver's Age: 20 Sex: M Citation Issued: N

Direction of Travel: SOUTH Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N

Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD

Apparent Factors: FAILURE TO YIELD RIGHT OF WAY, VIEW OBSTRUCTED/LIMITED

County: Ulster Muni: New Paltz(V) Ref. Marker: 299 86011058 Street: MAIN ST AT INTERSECTION WITH Huguenot St

7/7/2011 Thu 09:53 AM

Persons Killed: 0

Persons Injured: 1

Extent of Injuries: C

Case: 2011-33935561

Accident Class: INJURY Police Agency: Num of Veh: 2

Type Of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: STOP SIGN

Manner of Collision: RIGHT ANGLE Weather: CLEAR

Road Surface Condition: DRY

Road Char.: CURVE AND GRADE

Light Condition: DAYLIGHT

Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE

Veh :2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 2070 State of Registration: NY

Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: 19 Sex: F Citation Issued: N

Direction of Travel: WEST Public Property Damage: Y School Bus Involved: N

Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD

Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE, NOT APPLICABLE

Veh :1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 2453 State of Registration: NY

Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: 65 Sex: F Citation Issued: Y

Direction of Travel: NORTH Public Property Damage: Y School Bus Involved: N

Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD

Page 185: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Apparent Factors: FAILURE TO YIELD RIGHT OF WAY, DRIVER INATTENTION

Page 186: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Accident Location Information System (ALIS) Date:

06/06/12 05:53

Accident Verbal Description Report Page: 4

Data in this report covers the period Jan 01, 2009 - Dec 31, 2011 Complete Accident data from NYSDMV is only available thru 12/31/2011 County: Ulster Muni: New Paltz(V) Ref. Marker: Street: HUGUENOT ST AT INTERSECTION WITH State Route 299 W

7/8/2011 Fri 16:40 PM

Persons Killed: 0

Persons Injured: 2

Extent of Injuries: BC

Case: 2011-33940852

Accident Class: PROPERTY DAMAGE AND INJURY Police Agency: Num of Veh: 2

Type Of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: STOP SIGN

Manner of Collision: HEAD ON Weather: RAIN

Road Surface Condition: WET

Road Char.: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL

Light Condition: DAYLIGHT

Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE

Veh :2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 3457 State of Registration: NY

Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: 60 Sex: M Citation Issued: N

Direction of Travel: WEST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N

Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD

Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE, NOT APPLICABLE

Veh :1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: 2756 State of Registration: NY

Num of Occupants: 2 Driver's Age: 21 Sex: F Citation Issued: Y

Direction of Travel: NORTH Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N

Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD

Apparent Factors: FAILURE TO YIELD RIGHT OF WAY, NOT APPLICABLE

Page 187: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Accident Location Information System (ALIS) Date:

06/06/12 05:47

Accident Verbal Description Report Page: 1

Data in this report covers the period Jan 01, 2009 - Dec 31, 2011 Complete Accident data from NYSDMV is only available thru 12/31/2011 County: Ulster Muni: New Paltz(V) Ref. Marker: Street: WURTZ AVE 31 Meters South of Main St

11/21/2009 Sat 04:13 AM

Persons Killed: 0

Persons Injured: 0

Extent of Injuries:

Case: 2009-33219275

Accident Class: NON-REPORTABLE Police Agency: Num of Veh: 2

Type Of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: NONE

Manner of Collision: SIDESWIPE Weather: CLOUDY

Road Surface Condition: DRY

Road Char.: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL

Light Condition: DARK-ROAD LIGHTED

Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE

Veh :1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: State of Registration: NY

Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: 27 Sex: M Citation Issued: Y

Direction of Travel: WEST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N

Pre-Accd Action: BACKING

Apparent Factors: ALCOHOL INVOLVEMENT, DRIVER INATTENTION

Veh :2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: State of Registration: NY

Num of Occupants: 2 Driver's Age: Sex: Citation Issued:

Direction of Travel: EAST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N

Pre-Accd Action: PARKED

Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE, NOT APPLICABLE

County: Ulster Muni: New Paltz(V) Ref. Marker: Street: WURTS AVE 46 Meters South of MAIN ST

12/18/2010 Sat 21:15 PM

Persons Killed: 0

Persons Injured: 0

Extent of Injuries:

Case: 2010-33696812

Accident Class: NON-REPORTABLE Police Agency: Num of Veh: 2

Type Of Accident: COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Control: NONE

Manner of Collision: REAR END Weather: CLEAR

Road Surface Condition: DRY

Road Char.: STRAIGHT/ GRADE

Light Condition: DARK-ROAD LIGHTED

Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE

Veh :2 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: State of Registration: NY

Num of Occupants: 2 Driver's Age: Sex: Citation Issued:

Direction of Travel: SOUTH Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N

Pre-Accd Action: PARKED

Apparent Factors: NOT APPLICABLE, NOT APPLICABLE

Veh :1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: State of Registration: NY

Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: 67 Sex: F Citation Issued: N

Direction of Travel: WEST Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N

Pre-Accd Action: BACKING

Apparent Factors: VIEW OBSTRUCTED/LIMITED, NOT APPLICABLE

County: Ulster Muni: New Paltz(V) Ref. Marker: 299 86011059 Street: WURTS AVE AT INTERSECTION WITH MAIN ST

5/26/2011 Thu 22:38 PM

Persons Killed: 0

Persons Injured: 0

Extent of Injuries:

Case: 2011-33891003

Accident Class: NON-REPORTABLE Police Agency: Num of Veh: 1

Type Of Accident: COLLISION WITH OTHER FIXED OBJECT Traffic Control: NONE

Manner of Collision: OTHER Weather: CLOUDY

Road Surface Condition: Road Char.: STRAIGHT AND Light Condition: DARK-ROAD

Page 188: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

DRY LEVEL LIGHTED

Loc. of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE Action of Ped/Bicycle: NOT APPLICABLE

Page 189: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Accident Location Information System (ALIS) Date:

06/06/12 05:47

Accident Verbal Description Report Page: 2

Data in this report covers the period Jan 01, 2009 - Dec 31, 2011 Complete Accident data from NYSDMV is only available thru 12/31/2011 County: Ulster Muni: New Paltz(V) Ref. Marker: 299 86011059 Street: WURTS AVE ***** CONTINUED Veh :1 CAR/VAN/PICKUP Registered Weight: State of Registration: NY

Num of Occupants: 1 Driver's Age: 30 Sex: F Citation Issued: Y

Direction of Travel: NORTH Public Property Damage: N School Bus Involved: N

Pre-Accd Action: GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD

Apparent Factors: ALCOHOL INVOLVEMENT, NOT APPLICABLE

Page 190: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

81

Appendix E: Traffic Signal Data

Page 191: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study
Page 192: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study
Page 193: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study
Page 194: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study
Page 195: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Water Street Cinema: Traffic Impact Study Page

82

Appendix F: Business Inventory

Page 196: Water Street Cinema Traffic Impact Study

Inventory of Businesses between the Wallkill River and Route 32/Route 208 Groovy Blueberry - Retail clothing and gifts - Own parking lot Gilded Otter - Restaurant/Brewery - Own parking lot La Stazione - restaurant - own parking lot Water Street Market - various businesses - Own parking lot Karma Road - restaurant - Own parking lot Bike Shop - Own parking lot 36 Main Street - restaurant - 7 days; 12 pm to 3 pm and 6 pm to 11 pm Snugs Tavern - Kosssover Law Offices - Monday to Friday 9 am to 5 pm - Own Parking Lot Rock & Snow - sporting goods - Own parking lot a tavola - restaurant -255-1426 Mixture Prints - retail prining shop 561-2857

Inventory of Businesses between Route 32/Route 208 and Plattekill Avenue

Fat Bob's - pizza restaurant Jacks Rhythms CDs and Vinyls Sweet Candy and Ice Cream Cabaloosa Cafe Teria Root - Rock Da Pasta - Friday, Saturday, Sunday 11:30 am to 11 pm Gourmet Pizza Kon-Tiki International Bazarr Art & Soul Tattoo & Piercing Huguenot Creamery Anatolia Turkiish Cuisine McGilicuddys - Resatrant and Bar Starbucks Neko Sushi Yanni Restaurant & Cafe Moonlight Cafe Groovy Blueberry Fashion Cut Main Street Bistro - Monda - Friday 8 am to 9 pm, Saturday 7 am to 9 pm SUnda 7 am to 6 pm Likwic Cocoon - Gifts, Accesories, Home goods, Jelwery, etc - Friday and Saturday 11 am to 7 pm, Sun 11 am to 5 pm City Chick Hair STudio- by appt only Ashtanga Yoga Earthgoods Natural Food - Friday 8 am to 9 pm, Saturday/Sunday 9 am to 9 pm Rambling Rose Boutique Aphrodites Antiques Jacks Meats - 7 days 8 am to 8 pm Isabella's On MAin Manny's Art Supplies P & G's !