Water Quality Credit Trading Florida League of Cities 2013 Annual Meeting.

14
Water Quality Credit Trading Florida League of Cities 2013 Annual Meeting

Transcript of Water Quality Credit Trading Florida League of Cities 2013 Annual Meeting.

Page 1: Water Quality Credit Trading Florida League of Cities 2013 Annual Meeting.

Water Quality Credit Trading

Florida League of Cities2013 Annual Meeting

Page 2: Water Quality Credit Trading Florida League of Cities 2013 Annual Meeting.

Overview

• Clean Water Act 101• Complexities of Regulating Nutrients• Water Quality Credit Trading

– New statewide policy– A tool in the toolbox for water body restoration

• Future Policy Modifications?

David Childs Hopping Green & Sams 2

Page 3: Water Quality Credit Trading Florida League of Cities 2013 Annual Meeting.

Clean Water Act 101• Water Quality Criteria

– Protect “designated uses” of water bodies– Translated into discharge permit limits

• TMDL Program (safety net)– Restoration program– Point and non-point sources allocated pollutant

loads• Discharge Permits

– Wastewater Treatment Plants– Municipal Storm Water Discharges

3David Childs • Hopping Green & Sams

Page 4: Water Quality Credit Trading Florida League of Cities 2013 Annual Meeting.

Nutrient TMDLS

• Florida already has over 80 nutrient TMDLs– FDEP Numeric Nutrient Criteria Rule approved by

EPA means even more nutrient TMDLs• Significant nutrient reductions for storm water

– Bayou Chico: 30% TN & TP reductions– North Escambia Bay: 35% TP reduction – Hillsborough River (channelized segment): 50% TN

& 60% TP reductions– Lake Dora: 67% reduction in TP

4David Childs • Hopping Green & Sams

Page 5: Water Quality Credit Trading Florida League of Cities 2013 Annual Meeting.

Complexity of Regulating Nutrients• Citizens have an expectation of healthy natural

rivers, streams, lakes, and marine waters…

5David Childs • Hopping Green & Sams

Page 6: Water Quality Credit Trading Florida League of Cities 2013 Annual Meeting.

• …but public expectations do not always mesh with scientific, economic, & regulatory realities.

• National Academy of Sciences: Reality Check– Report on Chesapeake Bay TMDL– Public concern ≠ public willingness to pay the price– Disconnect between achievement of a standard &

appreciable water quality improvement– Substantial public commitment and “some level of

sacrifice from all who live and work in the watershed”

Complexity of Regulating Nutrients

6David Childs • Hopping Green & Sams

Page 7: Water Quality Credit Trading Florida League of Cities 2013 Annual Meeting.

What tools are available to help cities restore water bodies and comply with nutrient load reduction

requirements (i.e. TMDLs) in a cost effective manner?

7David Childs • Hopping Green & Sams

Page 8: Water Quality Credit Trading Florida League of Cities 2013 Annual Meeting.

Water Quality Credit Trading• TMDL Program (safety net)

– Restoration program– Point and non-point sources allocated pollutant

loads• Water Quality Credit Trading

– Pollutant reductions are environmentally valued in the form of “credits,” which can then be traded on a local “market” to promote cost-effective water quality improvements.

– Goal: better water quality protection for less $$.8David Childs • Hopping Green & Sams

Page 9: Water Quality Credit Trading Florida League of Cities 2013 Annual Meeting.

Water Quality Credit Trading• HB 713 (2013)

– Bipartisan Passage– Supporters included the League of Cities,

Southeast Milk, Audubon, and other diverse interests

– Expanded the St. Johns Pilot Program Statewide– Trading is voluntary & completely market driven

• References: – §403.067(9), F.S. – Rule 62-306, F.A.C. (not yet updated)

9David Childs • Hopping Green & Sams

Page 10: Water Quality Credit Trading Florida League of Cities 2013 Annual Meeting.

Water Quality Credit Trading

10

CAFO Storm Water Utility

Economic Solution

$$$

Nitrogen Load

► Water Quality Standards Achieved►Local Government Saves Money

Page 11: Water Quality Credit Trading Florida League of Cities 2013 Annual Meeting.

Water Quality Credit Trading• The nitty-gritty

– Credits must be quantifiable & enforceable– Point source credits must be measured– Nonpoint sources can be estimated

• Reasonable assurance• Uncertainty factor

– Location factors may increase credits needed– Creditable actions include…installing treatment

equipment…operational changes…structural nonpoint source management

David Childs Hopping Green & Sams 11

Page 12: Water Quality Credit Trading Florida League of Cities 2013 Annual Meeting.

Water Quality Credit Trading• Practical & Program Limitations

– Trading will not work everywhere– Need willing buyer and willing seller– Seller must meet its allocation & can only sell its

surplus reductions– Transaction must include a surface water

discharge permit holder– No credit for land use changes that don’t result in

loadings equal to or less than natural conditions– Ongoing nutrient criteria litigation = chilling effect

12David Childs • Hopping Green & Sams

Page 13: Water Quality Credit Trading Florida League of Cities 2013 Annual Meeting.

Credit Trading 2.0?

• Remove barriers to entry into marketplace– Allow trading in absence of discharge permit– Loosen timing requirements– Enable “mitigation banking” style credit

generation• Expand concept into water supply arena

– Promote land use conversions that restore landscape and promote aquifer recharge

13David Childs • Hopping Green & Sams

Page 14: Water Quality Credit Trading Florida League of Cities 2013 Annual Meeting.

Discussion

14

David W. Childs [email protected]

Hopping Green & Sams119 S. Monroe StreetSuite 300Tallahassee, FL 32301(850) 222-7500