Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group

52
Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group Argonne NL Boston University* Brookhaven NL Caltech* Univ. of California, Davis* Univ. of California, Irvine* Drexel University* Duke University* Fermi NL Lawrence Livermore NL* Univ. of Maryland* Univ. of Minnesota Univ. of Pennsylvania* Rensselaer Poly. Inst.* Univ. of South Carolina* Univ. of Wisconsin* * Funded through S4

Transcript of Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group

Page 1: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group

Water Cherenkov

Detector Design Group

• Argonne NL

• Boston University*

• Brookhaven NL

• Caltech*

• Univ. of California, Davis*

• Univ. of California, Irvine*

• Drexel University*

• Duke University*

• Fermi NL

• Lawrence Livermore NL*

• Univ. of Maryland*

• Univ. of Minnesota

• Univ. of Pennsylvania*

• Rensselaer Poly. Inst.*

• Univ. of South Carolina*

• Univ. of Wisconsin*

* Funded through S4

Page 2: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group

What is a Water Cherenkov Detector?

• Charged particles with velocity faster than c/nproduce directional, polarized photons

• Light sensors such as photomultiplier tubes can be used to detect the light

• This provides particle tracking and identification

Page 3: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group

nee+- shower

Example of an electron

neutrino interaction

The detector is essentially a

giant camera

color in this plot represents

intensity of the light

Time-resolved images with

sub-nanosecond accuracy also obtained

Page 4: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group

nm C.C. interaction: particle ID

• Sharp Ring Edge

• Cherenkov Angle < 42o

Easy to identify from

electrons

mnm

Page 5: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group

IMB

3 ktonsKamiokande

1 kton

Super-Kamiokande

22 ktons

SNO

1 kton

Page 6: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group

Detectors for DUSEL

22 ktons

300 ktons

Super-

Kamiokande DUSELIMB

3 ktons

Note: the DUSEL detector will

likely be realized in 2-3 modules

The muon rate in the DUSEL detector

will be 1/30th that of Super-Kamiokande

Page 7: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group

Cosmic ray induced neutrinos

Would pass Super-K in statistics after

~1.5 years.

Issues:

1. improved sensitivity to nm -> nt

2. oscillation mixing angle

3. “exotic” phenomenon

Page 8: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group

10 kpc with 300 ktons

CC ne 70,000 eventsNC nx 3,000 eventsES ne 3,000 events

• Huge signal for a galactic supernova

• More importantly: very precise knowledge of the cross-section (~0.2%) for ne + p -> e+ + n makes the statistics meaningful!

• Double coincidence: zero background (need Gd)

• Positron spectrum mirrors neutrino spectrum

Page 9: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group

S. Ando, J. F. Beacom and H.Yuksel,

astro-ph/0503321

A SN in M31 would

~3-5 events/100 kton

It would be easily

detectable in a large

water detector of

Size ~300 ktons

Background is large

bursts of spallation

products following

a muon-induced

shower

deeper is better

DUSEL is capable of detecting

a supernova in Andromeda Galaxy

Page 10: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group

The feeble signal of all SNe

• Sum over the whole universe: Supernovae

S. Ando and K. Sato, New J.Phys.6:170,2004.

Page 11: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group

Spectrum fitting in SK-I

Visible energy [MeV]

SK-I

spectrumcatmospheriiN

spectrumcatmospheriiN

spectrumMCSRNiN

spectrumDatarealiN

e

relic

data

e

mn

n

n

n

m:)(

:)(

:)(

:)(

Courtesy Iida, ICRR

Page 12: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group

Gadolinium Doping• Sensitivity to neutron capture via 8 MeV gamma

cascade (e.g. M.Vagins, NNN08)

• Inexpensive, low risk. Could be implemented after construction completed, no schedule risk.

• Technical challenges:

- material compatibility. Chose materials that do not contaminate the water.

- water treatment . Remove impurities but leave gadolinium in solution.

R.Svoboda, 3 November 2008

Page 13: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group

Status of theory: anti-ne flux

• Differences due to different inputs/methods

C.L., Astropart.Phys.26:190-201,2006

For a Gd-loaded 100 kton WC detector, estimates

range from 2-20 events/year.

SK background of ~20/year significantly reduced by

neutron tagging. (Beacom and Vagins)

C.L., Astropart.Phys.26:190-201,2006, Fogli et al. JCAP 0504:002,2005,

Volpe & Welzel, 2007, C.L. & O.L.G. Peres, to appear soon.

Page 14: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group

Nucleon Decay

• Neutrinos, electrons, photons, and protons are the only known stable particles

• Stable over what time scale?

• Lifetime of universe 1010 years

• Many theories that try and unite the known forces of nature into a “Grand Unified Theory” (GUT) predict that free protons will decay with lifetimes of 1030 years or longer

Page 15: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group
Page 16: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group
Page 17: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group

Solar Neutrinos: A well-understood beam of low-energy ne

• water Cherenkov technique allows for tracking

• neutrino-electron scattering preserves direction of parent neutrino

• recoil electron spectrum related to neutrino spectrum

• more than 200 per day!

Page 18: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group

DUSEL LONG BASELINE EXPERIMENT

Page 19: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group

3

2

1

τ3τ2τ1

μ3μ2μ1

e3e2e1

τ

μ

e

ν

ν

ν

UUU

UUU

UUU

ν

ν

ν

10/1/2009 R.Svoboda 19

Neutrino Mixing

sij = sinqij cij = cosqij

atmospheric solar

Page 20: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group

10/1/2009 R.Svoboda 20

but we don’t know the mass orderingor absolute mass scale

Also –Don’sviolateCP?

If q13 is large enoughOur DUSEL detectorcan answer the masshierarchy and CPquestions

Page 21: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group

10/1/2009 R.Svoboda 21

ne appearance in a nm beam

P(nmgne) = (2c13s13s23)2 sin2F31

+8c13s12s13s23(c12c23cosd-s12s13s23)cosF32sinF31sinF21

-8c13c12c23s12 s13s23sind sinF32sinF31 sinF21

+4s12c13(c12c23+s12s23s13-2c12c23s12s23s13cosd)sin2F21

-8c13s13s23(1-2s13 )(aL/4E)cosF32sinF312

2

2

2

222

2

222

22

a = constant X neE CP: ag-a, dg-d

Page 22: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group

Experiments and Projects

An Experiment

A Project

Page 23: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group

Major Project Components

• Neutrino Beam. Plan initially for 700 kw beam with potential for up to 3 MW later. Project Office at FNAL.

• Near Detector: for characterization of the beam. LANL proposed to have a major role.

• Far Detector. Project Office at BNL and S4 proposal from NSF for Water Cherenkov detector development. LAr detector development through FNAL (see Bonnie’s talk)

Page 24: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group

Large Cavity, Water Cerenkov DetectorWater: 53m Dia. x 54m vertical,

Fiducial Volume: 50m Dia. x 51m verticalEntrance Drift

at 4850L

Excavation Ramp

to Mid-Levels

Excavation Drift

at Lower Level, 5040L

Large Cavity

Utility Rooms

Water Level

Page 25: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group
Page 26: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group

The Big Hole

• One large cavity is included in the scope of DUSEL

• Large Cavity Board report: a large 100 ktondetector could be built safely and economically. 150 kton cavities may also be possible.

• RFP for cavity cost to be issued very soon

• DOE may also build one cavity

Page 27: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group

Water Containment

• Keep Rock out

• Keep water in

• Keep costs down

Page 28: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group

Possible Solutions

SK IMB, SNO

miniBooNE KamLAND

Page 29: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group

Photon Economics

• About 50% of the detector cost is expected to be in photosensors

• Even small improvements can make a big impact

• Development of light enhancement techniques underway

• New high QE PMTs are now available – will be tested in a statistically large sample this year

• Prevention of implosion chain reaction (BNL+U.S. Navy)

• Developments outside S4: waveshifting dyes, MCP development

Page 30: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group

Other Experiment Components

• Electronics

• Water transparency

• Gadolinium loading

• Calibrations

• Project Integration

• Safety

• Environmental ImpactThere is excellent cooperation between

the DOE and NSF groups

Page 31: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group
Page 32: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group

The Goal

Page 33: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group

Large Cavity, Water Cerenkov Detector,Cross Section at bottom

Utility

Rooms

Excavation Ramp

to Mid-Levels

Entrance Drift

at 4850L

Large Cavity

Fiducial Volume

50m dia. x 51m vert.

Water Volume

53m dia. x 54m vert.

Excavation Dimensions

Excluding Dome

55m dia. x 60.5m vert.

Liner: 1m

PMT’s

Buffer zone: 1.5m

Page 34: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group

Example Event (p→μ+ π0)

• Fully contained, Fiducial volume

• 2 or 3 rings

• Correct PID of rings (e‐like/μ‐like)

• π0 mass 85‐185 MeV/c2

• Correct # of μ‐decay electrons

• Mass range 800‐1050 MeV/c2

• Net momentum < 250 MeV/c

Page 35: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group

Improved p0/e separation

• 2-R e-like tag (old ring-finder)

• p0 fitter (improved ring-finder)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

200MeV 400MeV 600MeV 800MeV

pi0 old

pi0 new

e old

e new

Reco

nst

ruct

ion e

ffic

iency

of

p0(%

)

Page 36: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group

Excellent particle identification

Page 37: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group

• 1300 km distance is significant for determination of neutrino mass hierarchy

• Deep underground site allows rich physics program in addition to LB neutrinos

Page 38: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group
Page 39: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group
Page 40: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group

Proton Decay Limits

Page 41: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group
Page 42: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group
Page 43: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group

NAVSEA test stand

Page 44: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group

78 high quantum efficiency 10”PMT successfully tested for use in IceCube

• More than 4000 sensors with standard 10” PMT (R7081-02) integrated and tested in IceCube

• 78 high quantum efficiency PMT (10”) tested with IceCube standard production test program.

• Result: – Quantum efficiency ~38% higher (405

nm, -40C)

– No problems found

– Low temperature (-40C) noise behavior scales with quantum efficiency as expected.

• Plan to use high QE PMT on 6 Deep Core strings for enhanced sensitivity at low energies (<100GeV, dark matter)

• Sensors already at the South Pole

A. Karle, UW-Madison

Page 45: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group
Page 46: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group
Page 47: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group
Page 48: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group
Page 49: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group
Page 50: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group
Page 51: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group

300 kTon + 2.4 MW

R.Svoboda, 3 November 2008

M.Dierckxsens

Mass Hierarchy CP violation

5% background uncertainty

120 GeV 0.5 OA

Page 52: Water Cherenkov Detector Design Group

100 kTon + 700 KW

R.Svoboda, 3 November 2008

M.Dierckxsens

Hierarchy

5% background uncertainty

120 GeV 0.5 OA