8/19/2019 Watch Out! July 6, 1975

1/8

p r i m y over alS

crw&d

t h w . In

him

every-

on

.

Tf

Paul

had wiiarhtd

tcr

e xp r e e r k a t e r idea [tha

whole univeme hab been created through him and

war

created],

hg had Gmk wor

for him.

And he

exists before everything, and all

m

he

word

P S ~ E O ~ E ~ H ~ : S ,

h g

firs

things

rct

held together

in

him.

. .

He is its origin,

bever, hU She wor

. In aI1 thtngs d o n e supreme. For in him the

meaning ' h t w t t e n ,

wM

dg

mrnpletr kh of

God, by God's own choice,

im quite different, .

t o

dw@n,401w~iam

:15-19 w E q d t

fit of Alexandria wrote Exwrpta

Bible

m ro wtrndy a humlrd years after the deat

A;CI;YIRATE ~~E~

of the a p d e J o b .

In

it he eontrssts

the

word

Thc unlearned

aad

unstable twisting these

potot s md

p r r t ~ a

Other ehrittia

words of h u l ar they

da

the other scriptures

ta

wri ten of &JE~

mt

mt u r S $ ~

.E.

liLOO made thi

their awn destructkm.-2 EPater 3:16 They are well

distinction. Paul

&

net Ufir&=elrated:' bu

scribed

as

ever

2

never able to come

first-born, an C X ~ & Q ~tanlne

mmc~mg

to an accurate af the truth. -

altogether different.

2

%thy

3 7

Faithful

whole-

b o d i n g to Dr W i i l h f

hr

of th

muled

service

ts

Jehovah

must

Urrkeadty of British Culumbfmr: T h e @ad irs

t3ecei.we.d

by

these

a m

who are '

Mw

born b d ong

rincs

aa r sd t o

ing thb

md of &~& -2 cmhhhng

4:2 Careful corn-

iiteml

just

parison

o

II frvlnhticuari

PL

WWB as referring

3, fismtf with u& I ht p

to t or

m k ext will bring out the true

tlts

first

minister En ad hnu R C ~

ad, k

s th

mning of any

lEs.assage

o

one

o rusts

in

most preeminent. A, kbtsl ia the

p f h e

of hib lif

Jehov& all

his

heart and does not lean

hit has long since

lef

fir& pstt of fi ife &hind

own p m ~ ludgment.-Proverbs 3: 5

Similarly, ffr flbcrm arn$

io

denote mt priority i

Ricad

an,

with

this m s t d early u n b r s t d ,

but

preemineme

in

*nL'

that no prophetic

Scripture

can

be

awn

y

I t , h 0 u H mmb.ed a ulrongqr

mgk sw mmerthl

omn**-2 hter of action

caused Reuben

t a forfeit his n

a

8e.y Vemb n ThenPore p q ,

Unkowr my

firstborn (2 Chr

5:

1-2) and i t s well

tha

at

9

thiw out

Em .rtmlIy

a l d his rank of firitborn t J&.

his l p e u m r brother.-(;en 25:33

Carnmn.ting an the five books of M o m Rabb

TED.

d J e k o v h the Firstborn of th world.

n,

N.J.

rofessor

Surely h deca

not intend t o imply thpt

Jehvvah

of

New

Tertame

Literature, says:

was m t e d

or that

be 1

a

part

of the

wrdd

8/19/2019 Watch Out! July 6, 1975

2/8

Neither did

Paul

intend to imply that Christ was

created nor tliat he is a part of all things.

Clearly the

m p h b s on fIrJtborn rather than

firstborn. Hawever, regarding the words born

t , the not& English author

C.S. Lewis explains: To beget is t o k m e the

father of: to create is t o make. And the difference

is

just tHis.

When

you beget, you b e t amething

of the p m kind as youmlf . A rnmW t s uman

babies, a beaver begets little

beawrr,

a d r bird

k p t s eggs which turn into little bird& But when

you make, you make m m t h i n g s

a

d iE sm~ t ind

from yourself. A bird makes a nest, a k a v e r builds

a

dam, and man makes.

.

statue.

Now that's the first thing to p t clear. What

6 d beg b God; just as what man begets is

m.

'Whrt

GA

begets L God - hat is

why

thc

Father

d

im

Soin

%d.

but to his

f b n

he

says: God,

your

throne &a11

W

for

ever

and

1

8

Jerusalem Bible

X@4OF

ALL CREATION

Marry &tile ~ h o l a r s nderstand this to be the

@ n i W of comparison.

Abbott explains i t

as

priority in

time

and distinction from the g m .

This maker Chrirt p r i ~a md -rate f r m '*dl

aaUon .

Therefore, Moffrtt

-&*a

 He

is

the liktnerc of the

unseen God,

h r n

Brat,

before

all the

creation - or it was

by

lzim h t

ll

t h i n p

wtre

created.

.

.

J.B.

Phillip tmalntion re.&:

He w s

efore

c m t i m w n . h r & y o s

ttan for6

dl

m

Berkeley Version readr:

nrtlon. See also C.B.

tion The Living Bible,

t

faGf

that this unduly strains

the

firmnmr. Th+y

*hew t b phrase

u

a gedtfve of

Art ion . W C o o t explains it

u

Firatborn, t k t

Lard

of

all

cmticstt.'

tcd

Heir

of

l

things

reads: Firatborn over all creation. And the New

English Bi& says: ' hls is the primacy over a11

created things.

A footnote in

N

ivm born before all

creation as an aalternate mading. The m i n reading

then favora

'%ugrmey9'

Lsgktfoot et al) and the

alternate favors priority (Abbott e ta l ) . An

Expad&

tion

by Kenneth Wuert

tries

to

incorporate

both

Meas: The Son has priority t o

and m ~ e i g n t yver all creation.

Nom m m

Doea

Colossians :15 teach Christ is e m u o r

'This

interpretation

is

e x g e t i d l y and btmhEly

impossible; for verses 16-17 e m p h a W y

t inp i sh between

'him'

he

11

  wlf

crttltion, w o r d i n g to Baggot. (See hio h k ,

C ~ b s s i s n s , . 58.)

translation delibmtaly insstts

th w ~ r d'other four times in t k ~wa W ~ M So

d te r the thought to

imply

that Christ

is

th

creator of d l things exwpt Eane - himelf. This

reading would bring Pad fflta conflict with th

apostle John who sa@: All c r a t i o n took glace

through him, a d

mm

twk phce without him.

-John

1

:3MI@

Had the apacsth Paul

to sappy 'bfB%rnhe

m l d

h

i d ta slla; instead,

kc

z 1

(the all) words which

are

absolute a d

msmpn-

hensive and will admit no except1an . -wtfmt?

p 150

See

any Greek text, rg

nhF

K w m

InterJinem Translation.

BY HIM, THROUGHHIM, FOR

NtPd

En auto

mmno that

Christ

is

th

p

nr well as

the

inrtrumn

by means of him.* Pls did

else's agent. Christ k tka

Creator (through),

jtd

the herpaw

[Fw

f

aII

things,

%t

oaa

did firkt

a m

cS it bring a b u t

-tian; bb

wntinulsa

bs

ct

t b hold it together.

He b to dj,

tl

m fn liun. -Mo,

fa;T'BfWewrso to exist for in Instant,

all

c m t i m wm

fiy

spa€.b m k y e x p u hat

It is W a u s o s f Qrrfrt ' Y b wfrerse hangs t o p & -

a

d

d a r mt dirintqmtc

in

us.

8/19/2019 Watch Out! July 6, 1975

3/8

  So,

then, the San h

the

mb the end of etgUon,

ereation tagsther. is Cmat

md Me Finn1 eanlof the workt.

If t a

k

the Origfn of

God's craatim.

7

KJV God th Fntlmer llta

''faithful

d

rue anid ' the wnalngl  attv

21:56. Jurt

t.t we

understand the F I L ~ ~ B To refer

t f

ar the. Opiein

and DOISiaatian,n M

auldwa u n $ emW the Son rr

t

Oligin. Md

ha fiat my I a d lIIS Father am ~ n t ? - J ~ h n

i0:m

x u m m m

L - ,

:y

t-

Far

t

wzw

la

h h hat

the

d i W P u b s

wtlled

kr cut

Umlt,w- Mo

For

9

the

ar*irit ftd

o

dwell

in

him, -AT

The

It the

eoimg.1etenera or totality of

W

hs Sea

k

not only the irmp (eikon)of the

rs

ead;

n him im

the

totality

pletvrna).

t rryr:

UT e

Inas denotes

the rwn-total

Bnrclay'says the

Son

ia nat simply a sketch

o

God;

He is

not r wmmary

of God;

He

ismor tha

lifeless

portrait of Cod. In

Him

there is nothin

left out. erefore, Barelay's New TkursJa&n

reads: For

in

Hlm od in dl

His

fullnets wa

phased to trko up

his

r'bsde.

Phillip

t r m h b s : It was

in him

that the fu

Rature c Eod

ax to l in .

T T says: It w

by W r

wn

d&an

that the

h

as in M m l

the full IUfSLrt of

COd.

htor [2:9)

Frul

reitorat- t

lhw

all the fullness $

D W t f

' t i3 was m

rm w mnctp t ; years k f o m he had written to th

Corinthians exhlniq th t W

p r s o d y r-ging the world

Corinthians 5:19 P ow o

th

mys, For

in

him

all

the f d l m s

of

Cad

mz

pleased

t o

dwell,

md through h im to E ' E M I C ~

t

h m e l f l things, -RSV

Hal

au &m n e m

cdld to God 3

Undoubtedly christians ham asked you % i

quat ion before, in m e orm or other.

Are

you

avecl?' Ham

you been barn again?' Ba yo

haw

eternal He? We w u l d

like

to talk to yo

again. Look up the

perton

you t&ed to bfole

o

8/19/2019 Watch Out! July 6, 1975

4/8

- ' la tor^" b k d kt their religious traditions

and decided what they wanted the Bible t o

my; then

they

Ewkd fa r

an

excuse

far

"tmndrrting" mrtain

words

incorrectly.

S o m a t l m ~Aer deciding on the correct

t m d a t k n " these

ones

could not decide

m

.

the m m t excuse. John 8:58 is an exwl-

'

lent

example.

Traditionally they

do

not

trelieve t@t

Christ Jcsars

s

&far%Absalzam

came to be: themfare, Skey d a e d on ths

"tr;nnslatisn"

hawe

Qwn.I hs

fmh0t~18

the

95Q

sdltfon 9syst:

.

. pmpdy

denxi in

tho

parfsct Inldlefidnfte

tern,

.

Cmk

=hailan

quickly'

p in tad

out t b t na

edition t o

read:

f

.

pmperyY

m n d e d

in

the

perfect

tenm indisative,"

Six yearn

later

in their interifnear trarislrtion they kept

the

traditional hare bean but &n &awed

the

excuse in the f m t n o t e

to:

.p@p f-

ly rendered in the

perfeet

Etne.'?

These

'?tr'ansfatd3

elaim t o have

usas-d

the Weartccrtt

and

Hart Gretk text. Says the

t t ,

eagMumt of

the

md

HorP text a f the

: fm

-

The phrase

&cnw.

In

t b

me-

nd

the

eternal."

The

-&t9ssl aqua

that

einm

they

.

have

put

the

wr

atha

in bm&ets this

& o w

that

their nenddq

af C a l e s ~ a n s

1

:1 6 1

7

is sat

d i h o n w t but y w dane

merely

for

#he

mko

at

chrtfiieaticm. How-

ever,

the

insflion

of

the

wad

" ~ t h e r "

brackets.

Bmekcts were

add& later in

order t o retain

this

tsaditian rRer G ~ e k

scholars pointed out the cmr. Norim

t h t

brackets

are

not

uwd

when

atkrv7ia

added t o Phillipians 2: 18.

Clearly

the

"translators"'

have vialaad

the

first

part

of

Jehovah's carnmmd:

You

must not add t o i t nar take ttmy

f rom

it,'*

But what a h u t the

nd

put?

See their

interlincar at J o h 14 for

a

aitical

axample.

Notice that

the G m k text has

the

wor

"rne*Qbut the n amw EnQlM

colurtla does

;st,

If you

ark me anything

in

my

n am ,

I

will

do

itsn

Hen

Jesus

is

ttacbing his dieeipl~s u pray t o him and

that

h~

will

aamtr. Later

ht

fa the3 them

kr pray to the Father and that the Father

w f H

an-=.

' lf you mk

the

Fathe-

$or

nme.

-- Jkskn

26:23

WRy d a the. " t m & t r '

Imve

out the

'ward

pnc9*

e t Joh* 14: i

'Adm4tfy

you

s f a ~ d e he w m m a n d m e ~ tsf Cad in

srrdtr

t a k t a i n your tradition." Mark 7:9

What

tradition?

The

tradition whieh

pays:

' ems did n a t teach them t o

pray

to

Rimslf, . . - Tmth Book, p. 152

Not only did Jesus tea& them to

pray

to

him; they f o i l 0 4 hb instructions

and

pmyd to him

Pauf'r

prayer to Chrjart

(''Lard, what

will

you haw:

me

da?' - Acts 9:d) mrked the

,&art of his Life in

Christ.

%taph@n?arayqr

ta Christ

fuLslcd Jaws, receive

my spirit.

-

Acts 7:

59

marked

tka

end

of

his

earthly

mum and echoed

the prayer of our

Lard

at

kk

death:-

Luke 23:46

Throu&out

the

o ~ k f the Act3

nd t a the Lord J a u s

(me 9:21222

md

22: 16 far elrrrmgleo .The

disciples

duaizlg is

period wcfk-kn~wn

those w h Wca Jo n the name af (not

Jehavah - but mr

rd

Jesus Chti~t ."

Acts 9:

14 and

I

Carintkhnr

1

The

Epistles contain expm&ans

mch

"I thank

Christ:

Jema our

h r d

I

imothy

I 121, which am be

cla&fsed

as

prayer.

And

tha p~

nds in

that

mpiflmnt pmy &urcih wki&

is

sjosn

t~

be m - d

Amm,

~ ( j mOfd

Jws.

- RmhttjQn2%:20

is,

nat

mly

d m he tm Wslrld

add

te the

Ward of d

rr

t

it

fakes

away

fmm 9 9 'In

rhhtion

of

the

Bible's

d i e d m m m d .

-

Rtvelatisn

22 :

19

8/19/2019 Watch Out! July 6, 1975

5/8

HAVE COMPLETE UNITY?

J

EHOVAHS WITTIESSES

hive been in-

volved in many important court cass

a r o d he work . One

such

c w w k plsrm

in Scotknd in 1954 The followiq

is

from

that

case.

The hesldinp identify the p m n

king gueistiomd. Numbrri fellowing quo

tatbns indicate the page&of the tmmcript

where

each tedimony

s

mmrr2ed.

Itt mm

r n VV r t r n N

Questbn:

s

it not vital to

on religious matters?

+Q

A n w e r

: It certainly is.

-

.

e?@,c..:73.1>'-

+*-,. .,- .

Question: You have promulgated - orgive

the word

-

alse prophesy?

'

Answer:

W e

have - I do not think e have

promulgated false pmcagksy there have

b a n

statements that

were

e m m u & hat

is the way

1

put it,

fll

mhtakcn.

&&s#bn:

Back to the point

w w . A

f a k

't" ,YU .

prophesy was prornukpted?

&- siL;L

Amwer: agrm to that.

Question: It

had

to be aceepted

by

Jeho-

vah" Wgnems?

,.

, LZ==q

A m @ :

That is correct, T ; PL I-

-

Questfan: kt a member of' Jehovah% Wit-

ness$

Pmk

the

ew

himslf that that

pmphq

was

wrong and said

m

would

be disfellow&ipped?

Amwer Yes, if he said so and kept

persisting in creating trouble, because if the

whob organization believes one thing, even

though it be erroneous, and somebody else

starts on his own trying to put his ideas

across then there

is

disunity and trouble,

there cannot be harmony, there cannot be

marching together. . .

.

Our purpose is to

have

unity.

-

Q m s t b n :

. It

WPS pmmulgt3M as

~ w m t i o n ; nity at all msf~?, rgcg::

d :.~

matter which

must

be b l k d by 811

A ~ c I : nity a t l all

oosts

h m we

mmbm

of

fehovahVsWi t n ew

that the

bdievz

and am

a r e that Jehovah God is

Lord" Semngl Cornt i~ook gk a in

18747

w d ~ g ur orgkt luon, the governh b d y

- of mr omnlsatian to direct it, even

Answer:

That

was the publimtion of a fahe

t h ~ q h istakes ari%m d e from time to

prophesy, it

was

a false statement

or

an time.

erroneous statement in fulfilhent of

a Qvestion:

A unity based upon an enforad

prophesy that was false or erroneous. acceptance of false prophesy?

Qaestion:

And that had to be believed

by

Answer:

That

is

cx>ncededto be

bus.

the whob of JehovaKs Witnesses? Question:

And the person who expremsd

Amw e : Yes, because

YOU

must understand his view, as you ay, that it

was

wrong, md

we must have unity, we cannot have was disfelbwshipped, would be in breach

digunity with, a

of the Cavenant, if he was bbaptisd?

ot

of

p p l e

'

Answer: That is correct.

*-

, . , , I + . ,

-

..\-*

going every

Qumtfon: And

fs

you

sti

yesterdsf'gg:

way, an army

p e d y , would be warthy of death?

..

Amwer:

I think - -

-

s

supposed to

--

' . .

- r

.=?

-:q,gp~P.;- l-

-2

rnareh in step.

?

.* ..-. ,

.

. Quesrbn: Would you say ym or no? . -

I...

WATCH

W T

-

JULY 6. 137S

8/19/2019 Watch Out! July 6, 1975

6/8

Answer:

will

answer yes, unhaitating~y.wplswer: l r mn r necessary ror urn to read

Q u a t i o n :

Do yau

call

that

rekion?

that Judge Rutherford is in error on that

A m m : It certainly i%.

point, What he

is

inteasted in is

in

the

Q w s t f o n :Die you all it Christianity? presnt truth, the up-to-date truth.

Answer: I certainly do. - pp. 343-343

@&tion: Yareday s e n o n ce se t

be

FRED

W.

FWZ

publhhed do they?

Questfors:

But it

was

a calculation which is

Ymp we

Our

nger accept by

Dimc- Question: o that what it published sr the

t m f the Society7

Answm: That

is oarrect.

truth today by the

Society

may have to b

admitted to wrong in a few

years'

Amw e :

We have to wait and

see

-nxious to ma the

pordtion;

it

k a m e

mesfion:

hd in

the

body

bunden duty

* f

Jchovrh'g

Witneaa have h e n follouriw

a-t this mbkuh tha?

A P J J W C T ;es.

e m r ?

A : They have

k n

allowing rnircon-

? m f n : In what form ru his m h l c w itructions

on sdpturn.

t o on

cam ?

h ~ f h p r

mr ?

Awer: Wlnn

we

mched

the

I 9 l Anme Wel l

- pp.

112 114

and

the

work4

develspments

w nt faward,

lcnwe that we

undemwd pucJtbn:

~ u t &ink

you hrve told ut

of .

pp. lwl S-already that an acceptance of the beliefs

rn I right that it was at one

and

facts

is

t that in 1925 Abraham and Answer: Yes

other Prophets would come back to earth? Que tion: And there is no possibility of

Answcr:

They

were expected to

come

back picking

and

choosing amongst those facts

approximately then.

which you will accept, and those which you

Question: But they did not mme?

will reject. I t must be taken as a whole?

Answer: NO.

Answer:

That is right,

.

3.8.

Question: It w s published, was

the body of Jehovah s Witnesses

was

to

be expected in

1925?

Amwer:

Yes.

Question:

But that was wrong?

Answer:

Yes .

p. 120.

it not, to

that that

Questton:

a

that once again Judge Ruther-

ford preached error?

Answer:

He didn t

preach

the

full rounded

out truth af the matter.

Questdon:

In

that particular, not putting

too fine s paint on

it, he was in

error?

Answer:

He

was

n

cmr,

uestion: Haw

does

one- OW joining

and d i n g his erro-

neous view of Judge Rutharfard s, know,it

is now regarded

as

erroneous?

Queztforr

: . Jehovah s Witnesses accept

without question doctrines: and Biblical

interpretations as expounded by the Watch

Tower Bible and Tract Society through itr

Directors?

Answer: Yes.

Question:

In

publications both g.erioBiGltl

and in book form?

-Answer:

Yes.

p.

25

A m w m : T k s c h ive an expoaithm

On

the whole-Scriptws.

Question:

But an

autheritatiwdti expolritbsl?

Amwer:

They

mbm

the Bibb

on

the

statements

that

arr: tkrein made, and the

individual emmhr t the statement and then

the Scripture to rn that the statement is

Scripturally supported.

8/19/2019 Watch Out! July 6, 1975

7/8

..

Question:He

what?

Question: A witness has no alternative,

Answer: He examines the Scripture to 9ee he,

to

r m p t as authoritative

and

to

be

whether the statement

is

supported

by

the

@begredinatmdions iswed in

'The Watch

Scripture.

As

the

Apostle says Rave all

tow@' ' Tb d o m m t or Awake ?

things; hold fast that which

is gso8.' Answw: He must accept

tho=.

-

Question: I

understood the

g oG t i ~ n

s

be pp 122-123 .

. .

--

r- *'

.

-

do

please

m m c t

r

f I

am

wrong

-

:..-

,.

that

a member of

the Jehovah's Witnems

Quesrtopa: Can you tell me

this; are the=

',

.,

mwt awept as

a true Scripture

and

inttr-

~eol+csll

pubfic( Gam nd wmi-montMy

pmtatbn

what is

given

in

the

boob

I

phdiicala;uwd

for diwwion of

gutcments

~TGW

ou

o? of

doctrine: .. . .*

-

.

.

8/19/2019 Watch Out! July 6, 1975

8/8

 

Answer: 4124 BC

Q ues t bn: What is L I L ~ resent view?

Answer:

One hundred years have been

taken.off.

Qrrsstbn: What was Pa'stor Russell%view?

Answer: Pastor Russell had an extra one

hundred years

in

there.

Q u e s t b n :

So that date

has

been altered

three

t i m a ,

has it?

A m w e : The date s been eo-estcd.

& ~estiola:ut once the dote w s published

by the Society

aU

Jehovah's Wit%=% were

bound to accept it as scriptmlly true'

Answer:

Yes

Qucstbapt: A& 1hbk to dkfe'ellow-

shipped if they d m m d o the date?

Answer: If they c a u d trouble over it,

because

the Scriptures say that

if

anyone is

a

disturber inside the wngregation he is

hindering the growth of the congregation

and its activities and should

be

disfellow-

shipped.

Q ues t bn: Even though h~ prehrsnce were

supporting the date m w taken by the

Society,

when

the Society was p u b B ~ n g

t h wrong date?

Answer: One

who may have tp

difference

of

undershndiw

like

that

will

wait upon

Jehovah

W

tn

9 e:

if

he

is

correct,

3rd

he

will

abide t

s

published

for

the time

being,

Question:

But

if

he m

a w i b and under-

stands that he is correct what is he to do?

A n ~ w e r :He gets a

blessing

because of his

submission and wit

upon

Jehovah and

not

leaning to

his

own ufldentandhg.

Q w s t b n : In f ib respect dm

amely the

date of the

a m k g

of mankind upon the

earth, two e m

am

b.c f;l ubl*d as

authgritative Scriptwe?

Answer:

Yes, as azlthQrjtative c

'0p:ical

dates. - pp

118-119

Question:

Is

there any

h a p s f

salvation for

a

man

who depends ulp on Ris

Bibb

alone

when he is in a situation in the

world whe*

he anne t get the tracts and pubuations

of

your inctrmration?

A n w e : He is dependent upon the Bible.

Question: i l l

he

be able

to interpret it

truly?

A m w er: No. - p. 133

GRANT

UWER

Q u c ~ f b n :ndeed ean he in the rkw of

Jehovah" Witnesses have an understanding

of

the Ssiptures apart from the

gubliea-

tions of Jehovah's WItm*s?

Answer

No.

Q u e b i o ~ : nly by the pubtiations

can

he

h a the right understanding of the

Scriptures?

Answer: That is right.

Qb~estion:S that not arrogance?

Amwer: No.

Question: You heard the evidence about

1874 having been found to

be

wrong

as

a

material

and

crucial date, and a h u t 925

being a wrong date.

On

these two items,

acceptance and abmlute accepmm as

fmt2-1 was imp& upan

al

Jehomhss

Wit at f k h e ?

AMWW

T h t k *bt, -

pp.

499-500

mwmm

Q u e s t b n :

d

is the am

s it

not,

that on occa;sionsyou

haw ot

swken what

is

true?

[ ee

Ms

first anmEr above.]

A m w 1 have agreed to that many times

and I will agree to it many times mom hat

we

have made mSgfakes and pmchimd

error afld have had to correct oumkw

many times.. .

Question: Have you studied oampsrzztivt

religion?

Answer: I

have to

a

certain

t xbn t ,

not wry

extensively

I

must confess.

Question:

ou know of

ditrgr

telbbn

of

the world, as you wauM

put it

set awlled

which has as its set up of publlshiq

what

is

later proven

ta

be untrue but requiring

of

its members that under p i n of rpitituotl

death they must zlcmpt that untruth?

Amwtrr: I

do

not

knaw

of any . other

organisation except

Jehovah's

Witn

-p.

351

,

WATCH OUT

-

JULY B IFF3