~t:-SSIFIED ~~- WASMIH01'0 N

SYSTEM II 90744

-NATIONAL SECURITY. OIRECTI VE HUMS

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCT?

1986

IATING ROUND (S)

Tb• attached instruction• aupplement exiatin9 ~idance for the current round of the Ruclear and Space Talta (NST) which be9an on September 18, 1986, in Geneva. Tbey ••t forth in detail the propoeale ude to General Secretary Gorbachev cluring ey .... etln9 with blm in Reykjavik, Iceland, IUld provide quiclance for building on the a9ree1Mnta we reached there. (S)

Att,ac hmenta 1. overall Ina na of Octobe 21 1986 (S) 2. STllRT Ina of october ISi 3. Defenae and pace Inatructione o tober 21, 1986 (S) 4. IllP Inatructiona of October 22, 1986 (SI s. overall Inatructiona of October 27, 1986 (SI 6. Defenae e"4 Space Inotructiona of October 27, 1986 (SI

YEAR PERIOD, WITK ALL OF ELIMINATED, EITHER SIDE D&f£NSES.

C. SOVIET PROPOS>. UNITED STATES WOU

-.. EXERCISE tl!EIR-tl<I TREAT'!, WHICH IS OF PERIOD STRICTLY TO OBS TESTING IN SPACE OF AL

DEFENSE IS PROHIBITED, CONDUCTED IN LAJ!ORA'IORIES.

3 · - · '.-VI

UNCLASSIFIED IVE BALLISTIC. Ml BE FREE TO D

THE "' TO

TK£ ABM !NO THAT TK£

SILE

RESEARCH ING WITHIN THE FIRST. Fllll: YEARS

or THE TEN•YEAR PERIOD (AND THUS THROUGH 1991), Tll£ STRATEGIC OFn:NSIVJ: AlUIS OF T1IE two SIDES SllALL BE REDllCED BY SO PERCENT. DURING ta FOLLOWING Fllll: YEARS or TllAT PE:RIOD, THE REMAINING so PERCENT OF THE 'iWO SIDES' STRATEGIC OFl'ENSIVE ARMS S1IAt.L BB l\EDUCED. n!llS· BY TllE £ND OF 1996, THE STRATEGIC OFFENSIVE AIUCS or THE USSR AND THE UNITED STATES ILL RAVE BEEN LY ELIMINATED.

D. SECOND US PROPOSA BER 12. R AND THE UNITED STATES UNDER EN YEARS ERCISE THEIR EXISTING Rl RAWAL TREAT'!, WHICH IS OF UNLIM H, AND PERIOD STRICTLY to OBSERVE ROVISIONS NTINUING RESEARCH, DEVELOPMEHr TING, WB1C8 RM!TTED BY THE ABM TREAT'!. WI FIRST FIVE OF THE TEN-YEAR PERIOD (AHO OUOB 1991), RATEC!C OFFENSIVE

0

AAMS OF ta ES S1IAt.L BE aY 50 PERCENT. DU!t!NG TllE FIVE YEARS T PERIOO, ALL REMAINING V'E BALLISTIC s or TllE TWO SIDES SHALL BE REDUCED. THUS BY nu: END or 1996, ALL OFFEllSIVE BALLISTIC MISSILES OF TSE USSR AND THE UNITED STATES· NILL HAVE BEEN TOTALLY ELIMINATED. AT TllE END OF THE TEN•YEAR PERIOD, EITHER SID& ·COULD DEPLOY DEFENSES IF IT SO CROSE UNLESS TH& PARTIES AGREE OTHERWISE.

S. CUIDAllCK ON THE US PllO UNDER CONSIDERATION IN W ANAL YT !CAL WOltlt. IN SHOULD AVOW DISCUSS! TSE US PROPOSALS.

6. IF 21/ESTIONED REYX.JAVIK, THE US THE US INTENDS TO BUI ACCQllPLISBllENTS OF THE US WILL llE llAXING A P ACCOMPLISllME!aS SHORTL

US PRO CROUP S

TSE l'OSlTIVE AVIK MEETING,

IN GENEVA BA ASKED WBETllE

vu: IS DITIONAL NO CROUP

or

-­•

ADOITIONAL COIOllTME DISCUSSEO IN ltEYl<.1A NECOTI ATING GROUP

~ CLEAR BY TllE TERMS ADDITIONAL CO!IMI BY THE US WERE STRICTL REACHIN<l A NVTUALLY SA

SCllEDULE OF IU!DUCTIONS

SALS IONS. THE

IT WAS

R£DUCTIONS IN THE STRA FFEllSIVE FO BOTH SIDES TO EQUAL LEVELS BY 1991 AND TOTAL ELllllNATION OF THE OFFENSIVE BALLISTIC MISSILES OF BOTH SIDES BY 1996. SHULTZ • • END or CABLE ••

..

OP IMMED DE RUD!C 11883 296134 0 231335Z OCT 86 .ZFF FM SECSTATE HASllDC

SYSTEM II 90744 ATTACHMENT 4

..

TO USDEL HST CENEV IMMEDIATE S E C R E T STATE 33

C 0 R R E C T E D C 0 l MISSINC)

E.O. 12356' DECL' 0.\DR TAcs, PARM, HST, INF SUBJECT, ADDITIONAL GUIDANCE FOR THE INF NECOTIATINC CROUP

A) STAl'E 290224 (8) STATE 12553

•

1. SECRET -

2. FOLLOWING IS ADDI NEGOTll\TIN<:l GROUP I OCTOBER 11-12 R£YK

EVALUATE HOii BEST. TO 8 OF THAT MEETINC AND Ill SHORTLY, INCLUDING Oii! /\LL OFFENSIVE BAI.LISTI

· I\) REMAINS VALID. EXCE

2

GUIDANCE FOR I . R£FLECT ING. llAS

ON POSITI VIDE llDDITIO

THE CONCEP l tllS. PREVIO

IFIED BELOW

.F SSIONS IN NTlllUES TO

LISHMENTS DANCE LIMINl\TING DANCE (REF

3. /\GREED APPROACH . BASED ON REYKJAVIK DISCUSSION, THE U.S. IS READY TO ACCEPT- - AND llE UNDERSTAND THE SOVIETS CAii ACCEPT--AN LlllNF CEILING OF 100 llAIU!EADS ON EACH SIDE, MADE UP OF ZERO lllllllttADS ON EACH SIDE IN EUROPE AND 100 11.uu!EADS ON EACH SIDll OUTSIDE OF EU'ROPE IN SOVIET AS!/\ ON THE SOVIET SIDE, AND IN THE U.S. ON THE U.S. SIDE. N'EGOTIATIN<:l GROUP SHOULD CONFllU! SOVIET ACCEPTANCE OF THIS APPROACH.

4 . THE U.S. BELIEVES•• ACCEPT IN PRINCIPLE·· SHOULD BE SPECIFIC V ( 1) I\ COMPREHENSIVE PRIOR TO R£DUCTIO 08SERVl\TION OF ELI EFFECTIVE MONITORING l\SSOCIA~ FACILITIES. PREVIOUS GUIDANCE ON CONTINUES TO APPLY.

5. ADDITIONAL E REYXJl\VIK,

SOVIETS THERE INCLUDE, TA, BO'l'H

S: AND (3) RIES AND

ION. !CATION

UNDERSTOOD THAT OTHER OHS WOl1t.D IL\ E ADDED TO WHAT llAS /\GREED IN ORDER TO 111\KE II COMPLETE ACREEHE!fr. IH n!IS CONTEXT, TSE U.S. PROPOSES T!IB FOLLOWING,

- -- REDUCTIONS PROVIDED roR IN THE APPROACH IN PAR/\ 3 WOULD BE CARRIED OUT IN A PIL\SED MANNER TO B!! COMP~ PRIOR TO THE END OF 1991.

• PREVIOUS GUID SOVIET ASIA (REF B) ==:::.:= Tiii! APPROACH l!I PAltA 3

- •• THE NEGOTI II TO RESTRICT TBE HISSIU:S ALLOWED PREFERA8LY Kl\NSK. HAY NOT OnE:R RBCIPll Dlll'LOYllENT IN ALASKA. TO USE ALASKllN·NON·Dtr tllTllDRAllH.

SJIOUU) s SOVIET

J ABOYB NC TBIS • LIHITATIOHS OUS CONTlllCI~

(PAR/\ 10,

•

l\GREEMENT 33 ss-20 8ARlll\UL,

IEV'lilt, GROUP VIHC NON•

ORIZATION IS

• . • ·• All INF l\CR£EMENT S CONSTRl\INrS ON SRINF Ml S NECOTll\TIONS ON R£1>UCT WITHIN SIX llONTllS A REl\CHED.

•• THE U,.S, ·c - . ·I NF ACREEMENT BE or

BY All ACR£EM&NT ON FUR

SUCH A FU!ltllllR AC:RJ~ltl AMY INTERIM ACREEMBNT.

3 ·:.lllfttifASSIPIEU LI> INCLUDE l\S !IE S l\S PREVtOIJSt.Y N SRINF MtSSt HITIAL INF

REQUIRE TE DURllTIO EDUCTIONS;

Ct.COAL LEI) (REF. 8) LL BOOIN

IS ..

6. TllE INF NECOTIATINC CROuP SHOULD STRESS TBJ\T TllE U.S . PROCEEDS ON THE PREMISE THAT All INF ACREEMENr CAii BE

NECOTIATED, CONCLUDED AND IMPLDIENl'ED SEPARATELY FROM DEFENSE AND SPACE AND START ISSUES AND TBJ\T TllE U.S. DOES NOT ACCEPT ANY CONTRARY PREMISE FOR PROCEEDINC TOWARD AN INF ACREEMENt.

7 . PARACRAPB 7A CONTAI INF PROPOSA~MADE IN PARACRAPB 78 CONTAIN THE U.S.·SOVIET HORNING or 12 OC1~ THIS LANCUl\CE. BO THE: INFORMATION OF

A. SOVIET PROPOSAL;,';.__ti~ MISSILES. AN ACRE~ SOVIET AND U. S.MEl>IUM· NUCc.EAR POttNrlAt.S OF IUTAtN AND AFFt:CTED OR TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT. NECOTIATIOllS SIL\l.L BB INITIATED ON THE PARTIES' MISSILES WITH RANCES BEi.ow 1,000 Klt.OMETERS. SEPARATELY, AND AS EARLY AS PRACTICALLY POSSIBLE, NECOTIATIONS SHALL llE INITIATED ON SOVIET AND U.S. MEDI UM·RllllGE SYSTEMS IN l\Sl A.

B. U, S. LA!IGUACll TABLED A THE SIDES AGl\EB•

·· THAT SINCE Tim\! PROPE!l TREATllENT OP usoWTION or rats BASIS.

THERE WILL BE Ll,_MUJITSWK HlSSILES TO TllE ~ INTO ACCOIOO THE CAPAB REFUCT EQUALITY Btt><'El

YET EXlST SSILE SYS Lt. Bil r

STRAINTS ON ET LEWL, war s or TBBSll SY

U.S. AND THE

' BER 11.

ON T8B IA, TllE tORITY

THERE WILL BE SPECIFIC INCLUOE1 (1) A COMPRl:HEN DATA, BOTH PRIOR TO RED SITE OBSERVATION OF DE AND( J) EFFECTIVE !ION INVENTORIES AND AS INSPECTION. •

•• U. S. AND SOVIET INF SUBJECT TO AND CONSTRAI SIDES NEGOTIATE FIJRTHER

SYSTEMS. Sl!ULTZ •• END OF CABLE ••

. .._, . ..._ .... •. ·-.m .... .:

RIFICATION HEASU AND ACCUAATE E

S AND TllEREA ON DOllN TO F TllE REHA CILITIES

WHICH E OF

2 ) ON• EVELS; NF ,

OH· SITE

SUBJECT1 TAGS: REPS:

l. SECRET c.

l~1h \J ("\ i;;,. I

nCtASSlf lZll

(B) ST

IOll

SYSTEM II 90744 ATTACHllE.NT S

2. REFTBL A PROVID TI1J. POST- GUIDAHCE FOR ~HE NST DELEGATION FOR R I, REFLECTING SSIONS IN OCTOBER 11- 12 REYXJAVIJt HEl!T TRIS CABLE PR ADDITIONJ\L • CONTINGENCY COIDAHCE LATIONSRIP OF 0 THE CONCEPT OF ELIMINATING ALI. OPP "1.LISTIC HIS PREVIOUS GUIDANCE (REFS A AND Bl REMAINS VALID EXCEPT AS MODIFIED BELOW. GUIDANCE FOR THE DEFENSE AND SPACE NEGOTIATING GROOP IS BEING PROVIDED SEPTEL. TBBJU: WILL BE NO ADDITIONAL GUIDANCE POR START AND INF NEGOTIATING GROUPS TBIS ROUND.

3. TSE O. S. PROPOSAL TO llLIKIHATE ALL OPPENSIV!! BALLISTIC MISSILES, OF MBATl:VER RANGE, INVOLVES SNP SYSTEMS OP 'RANGSS t.BSS THAN THOSE PREVIOOSLY THE SUCH SYSTEMS MAY IUIQOI FORUM. ONLY TBB GENZ BASLLISTIC llISSII.BS SOVIETS RAISE QUEST TRIS REGARD , DEL U.S. OPINION LOGICAL PORUM.

4 . ONCE DELEGATION SUPPORTING INSTROCTI WASHillGTOll WOULD DATE POR COllllENT

SECRET Declaaaify en: ON>R

IEWED TlmSE IND IV ID DAL

SLl!:c1'TION' S V G ROUND .

IONS. DISCUSSION OP OPRIATB NEGOTIATING NG ALL OPPENSIVE

ROUND. SHOULD THE FOR SNI' llISSII.BS IN HIS TIME IT IS TBB

Y PROVIDE THE KOST

U<:l'IONS AND TDIG CROUPS, R APPROPRIATE ENDING

SECRET SYSTEM II 907ll' A'?TACHHENT 6

SUBJECT• ADDITIONAL 'cu CE FOR THB DEF ANO SPACE NEGOTIATING P

TAGS t PAN!, HCAP. . REF: (A) STAT

1. SECl\BT ·-. •

2. FOLLOWING IS NEGOTIATING CROUP PO PROVIDED IN REP C. REPLACE GUIDANCE FOR AND (C) EXCEPT AS K GUIDAllCB FOR START

GUIDANCE VI. IT SUP

IDANCE IS IN GOTIATI NG GI\ &BLOW. THE RBCOTIATING

(C) STATE 330272 -DEFENSE ANO SPACE S THE CUIOAllCE

ION TO, AND DOES NOi' llllFTELS (A) , , (B) BE NO ADDITIONAL THIS llOOND.

3. IN ADDITION TO THE EXISTING PROPOSAL IN THE Pl\BSIDENT'S JULY 25 LETTER TO GENERAL SECRETARY COIIBACBBV, WHICB llEKAIHS ON THE TAB.LE , TUB OS llECOTIATINC CROOP IS AOTllORIZEO !O PRBSENT THE FOLLOWING ELEKEN'l'S FOR AN AGREEMENT llBICB llE PROPOSED I N l\EY!tJAVlJ( AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE PRl!SIDEllT' S JOLY PROPOSAL.

THE USSR AND THE 11111 NOi' TO BXBRCISE THEIR EX TREATY, WHICH IS OF Ull STRICTLY TO OBSERVE DEVELOPMENT AND TES

WITHIN TBE THROUGH 1991) , SHALL BE REOOCEO B

DORING THE FOLL REMAINING OPPENSIVE B ELIMINATED.

D STATES lfOOLD ING RIGHT or WI !D DURATION ,

RTAltE FOR 'TEN YEARS WAL PROK THE ABM

RING TllAT PERIOD o!;(~ONTINUING RESEARCH, •• Y THE ABK TREA'l'Y.

PROVISIONS ICH ARB PE

PEllIOD (ANO TRUS 'l'llB TWO SIDES

ERIOD, THE TllO SIDES SHALL BE

THUS, BY THE ENO 96, ALL OPP ISTIC MISSILES OP TllE USSR AND THE UNITED S'l'ATES WILL SAVE BEEi! TOrALLY ELIMINATED, AND EITHER SIDE COULD DEPLOY ADVANCED STRATEGIC DEFENSES II' IT SO CBOSB, UNLBSS THE .PARTIES ACREE 01'l!ERWISB.

4 • THB ABOVll UNDERTAKINGS' WOQLD BE Rl!CON>ED Ill A REW TREATY.

5. Ill PRZSDrillG THE AB SBOULD HAQ CI.EAi\ TllA!' CONDITIOnD OR 'l'llll TWO AGREEKmrr BOW, AS P REDOCTIOllS UStJI.T OFFENSIVE PORCES ELIMINATION OF

~-!~.-

GOrIATillG GROUP BE STJUCTLY

Y SATISFACTORY SCll!DOLll 01'

IN THE STRATEGIC S BY 1991 AND TOTAL ES-OF BOTH SIDES BY

..

•

OP IMMED DE RUEHC 10271 2950316 0 220311Z OCT 86 FM SECSTATE WASHDC

OVERALL IN

TO USDEL NST CENEVA IMMEt>lllTE 1743 S E C R £ T STATE 330271

EXDIS, USNST

E.O. 12356' DECL:OllDR TACS: PARM , INF, START, M SUBJECT: ( S) llDDITIONAL AND SPACE TALICS

ll£F: STl\nl 291634

1.

TSPA, NST, DS E FOR US/SO

2. FOLLOW! NC IS llDD IT IDA.NCE FOR DELECATION IOR ROUND V ING DISCU IN OC'?OBER 1 1-12 REYKJAVIK llBETING. lfASBINGTON CIONTINVES TO EVALUATE HOW BEST TO BUILD Ul'ON POSITIVE·

ACCOMPLISllMtNTS OF THAT llEETINC AND WILL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL CUIDAllCE SHORTLY, INCLUl>INO OUIDANCE ON TllE CONCEPT or ELlllillATINO ALL OFfENSIVE BALLlSTIC MlSSltr;S 11111> ITS LUOC TO OBLICATlotl ITH RESPECT TO 11911

SYST£M II 90744 ATTACllM&NT l

'

TREATY. PltZ'illOUS CUID ITEL) ROIAINS ID EXCEPT AS MODIFIEI> ULOW. CUI l'OR llACB or E NEGOTIATING OllOCTPS IS ROVIDED S

3. U.S OBJECTIVES INCLUDE1

-- TO BUILD UPoH t8E REYICJAVIK BY INDUCING SllRIOUSNESS AND FLEXIB

-•• TO FRESENr U.S. P llNDERSTANDINOS REA INSTRUCTIONS TO .

•• TO REJECT SOVIET UNDERSTANl>INCS R&ACll&D

FOR AMPLI YKJAVIK, TINO CR

TO Ml: SClllAI Et.AM>.

-- TO REJECT SOVIET A TO HOLD PROO 0 NEGOTIA:rlNC FORUM HOST PROORESS IN DELECA:r!ON SllOULD VICO OBJECT TO

TH IN THE

CHAAACTERIZATION THAT PROCUSS IN INF IS ONCE ACAIN LlllK£D TO PROCRESS IN OTHER AREAS, NOTINC THAT THIS CONTRADICTS SPECIFIC llNDERSTANDINO REACHED DURINC CEN&VA SUMMIT TO SEEK A SEPARATE INF ACREDIENr AND TO ACCELEBATE PROCRESS IN IJIEAS OF COIOION CROUND.

4 . SHOULD SOVIETS RAISE ISSllE OF ELIMINATION OF ALL OFFENSIVE BALLISTIC MISSILE BY 1996, AS PROPO &I> BY PRESIDENT IN R£YICJAVIX, DE TION SHOULD T TUE FIRST STEP IN nu: El.IHI OF BALLISTIC !LIS MUST BE THE SO-PERCENT STAR IONS AND SI INF REOUCTIONS DISCUSSED AVIX AND S MORE EFFICIENT TO DISCUS PS FIRST WASHINCTON Alfl'ICI INC THI DETAILED CUIDAllCE C HISSI 27 OCTOBER.)

5. IF THE SOVIETS RAI ISSUES, TUE DELECATIO!I SROULI> BE PURS1JEI> IN SHOU[.J) THE SOVIETS SPE PROCR&SS IN HST, AS CORBACllEV IN REYlt.JAVIK, DEc.ECATION SHOU[.J) REPLY THAT THE

UNITED STATES EXPRESSED ITS READlllBSS IN REYJ:JAVllt TO ENTER NECOTIATIO!IS ON NUCLEAR TESTING ISSUES ANI> mAT SPECIFIC SOVIET R&COMllENDATIO!IS SHOULD 81!: RAISEI> IN TUE APPROPRIAT!: CBAHNELS. TUE DEc.EOATION S110t/LD RESIST Alf{ FllRTllER SOVlft BRORTS TO DISCUSS LIMITATIONS ON NUCl.&AR TESTING Ill 111B llST l'OIWll. ~ • • END or CABLE ••

-

l

•

-

OP IMMED DE RUEHC 10273 2950318 0 220312Z OCT 86 FM SECSTATE WASBDC

TO USDEL HST c:ENE\lj S E C R E T STATE

£XDIS. USSTMT

E.O. 12356: DECL:OADR TACS: l'ARM. START. ""'" SUBJECT: (S) ADDITIO OROUl'

0000

E FOR STAR

REF: (A) STATE 291634 (8) STATE 290210

l. SECRET • ENrlRE TEXT.

IATIHC

2. FOLLOlllNC IS ADDITIONAL CUID~E FOR THE START

'SYSTEM II 90744 ATTACHMENT 2

I NE<:O?IATINC CROUP IN R OCTOBER 11·12 R£Yl(JAVI TO &VALUATE HOW BEST ACCOMPLISHMENTS OF ADDITIONAL CUID

TIMEFRAME FOR SO•PERC Of ELIMINATINC ALL OF

2

.•

I, l\EFL!X:TINC lNO. WA.Sill

UPON POSI INC >.ND WI

INCLUDI ..

3. INC THAT TllE INC lfAS ACREEJ) 1'ND, THEREFORE, S. START CROUP SHOULD CONFllUI THEIR ACCEPTANCE BY THE SOVIETS,

-- A 1600 CEILINC ON ICBMS, SLBl!IS, HEAVY BOMBERS;

-- A 6000 CEILINC ON lfAA!IEADS, TO INCLUDE: ICBM WARHEADS, SLBM WARHEADS, >.ND LONC·RANC& AI.CMS.

-- ALL ITEAVY BOMJIERS COUNT ACAINST TllE SNOV LIMIT. EACH COUNT HEAVY llOMBER CARRYINC CMV BOMBS OR SRAHS

AS ONE Wt.MEAD TOlfARD IT or 6000. CARRIED BY HEAVY BOMB! COUNT AS 0 {FYI' AS PAAT OF THE TIONS ON ACCOUNTINC RULES FO INC THEii WORl<ED OUT, AND WA ITES DE SUCH RULES. )

-- CONSIDERATION OF APP PR CONTINUE.

-- HEAVY ICBMS llOULD BE IC

. ISIONS,

TO 8! vn:ws ON

• • TllE SIDES SllALL Pl ALLY ACCEPT LUTION TO LtMITINC DEPLOYKEHT OF LONG-RANCE NUCLEAR•AAMED SLCMS. WHEN SUCH A SOLUTION IS FOUND, IT lflLL NOT INVOLVE OOUNTINC LONC·RANCE NUCLEAR-ARMED SLCMS lflTHIN THE 6000/1600 LIMITS. IN TBIS RECARD, TllE DELECATION SHOULD SEEK OUT DETAILS, ESPECIALLY DETAILS RELATINC TO lltRIFICATlON, OF THE SOVIET POSITION THAT liOULD A1'1UIP1' TO MEET U.S. COHCEllHS.

4. IN THE CONDXr OF CRAVlTY BOllBS N4D S­LlMlT HEAVY llOllBDS A PART OF OUR POSIT!

5. AT UYKJAVlK, PROVISIONS WOULD BA ORDER TO MAKE A COllP SUllLlMlTS WERE DISCUSS THE CONSlDEIYITIOH or START NECOT!ATIHO 0 SUllLlMITS ON'

VE AGaEEllEHT PREVIOUS U.S.

REDUNDANT

·-•• BALLISTIC MISSILE W

ICBM WAIUIEAl>Si

WARHEADS ON AL - . BASED LICHT AHO-. -

•• WHILE Tl!! PREFEIUW> RElllllH 4500, 3000, Alm NECOTIATINO GROUP IS A

. ..._ -3

~

ICBMS WITH S

ON SILO: WAl\llEADS;

4800 BALLISTIC MISSILE S, 3300 IC S, AHD 1650 WARHEADS OH ICBMS EXCEPT SILO•BASED LIOHT OR M!J>IUM ICBMS WITll SIK OR FEWER WAlUl£AOS. (llOTEt THIS PROPOSAL

RESULTS IN NO RPT NO SUBLIMIT OH ALC14S.)

•• n1E AFOREMENTIONED SUBLIMITS All!: TllE U.S. PROPOSAL FOR IHPLEMEHTINC TllE SOVIET OFFER IN RE'ilC.JAVIK THAT HEAVY ICBMS BB SICHIFICAHT REDUCED. THE U.S SIDE ANTICIPATES THAT SUCH AH OM:!! WILL REl>U " VY ICBMS SIClllFICAHTLY (£. ROUCHLY HALF APPROPRIATE MANNER.

·· ALL OTHER E~~ PROPOSAL IU!lfAUI l\ND THE SO·PERCElll' WlllCHT) .

6 . T8E OCTOBER 15 SOV Tl!B SOVIET PROPOSAL FOR SO 'AL SHDVS AND WEAPONS AS WELL AS GIC SYsn:M (I.E., ICBMS, S !IV.VY ICH llAS PRf!SENrED IH RrtlCJAYIIC AND REJECTED BY THE U.S •• SHOULD TlllS FORMULATION BE TABLED IN CEllEVA, THE HECOTIATING CROUP SHOULD REJECT THE PROPOSAL AS FOLLOWS'

·· IH RE'tl<JAYIK THE SIDES AGREED IN PRINOIPLB TO 50· PERCENT RF.DUCTIONS IN STRATEOIC OFFENSIW AllllS, SPECIFICALLY TO 1600 SNDYS AND 6000 lfARllEADS APPROPRIATELY APPLIED. AIM OlHER B:LEl-i?l INITIAL SOVIET fOIUIULATI ROPOSED IN UYICJ' DITERlllNED BY TBS U.S. TIMI TO RE INEQUITABLll ourccem FORE MgRg U.S. PROPOSM. fOR SO REDUCTIONS ELEKEll?S MUTUALLY REYX.JAYIK AN AOREED &QUIT

7. EtfECtlYll VERIP AS AOREZD AT OEHEVA SllOULD Bl! N!X»?IADD LIMITATIONS. THE 'nlO PROORESS llADE IN lllP W PRINCIPLES (SEI! INr IN

or lU£ IC WERE

AH • THE ON 'l'llOSE DEi; FOR

"'

•• NECOTIATIOHS OH

S. EXCEPT AS HODIE'I ED REMAIN UNCHANC!!D .

9 . PARAGRAPH 9A

'· ·PROPOSAL MADE iH RE PARAGRAPH 98 CONTAINS U.S.-SOVIET EXPERTS C~ OCT08£R. 80TH ME PRO THE NEGOTIATING CROUP.

E TEXT 0

ER 11 . THE

lllO OF 12 TIOH OE'

-- A. INITIAL SOVIET P , AH OCTOBER • ON STRATEGIC ARMS . AN ACREEl!!Nr TO REDUCE SY FIFrY PEJ\CENT

THE STRATEGIC OFFENSIVE ARMS OF THE USSR AND THE USA TAKINC INTO CONSIDERATION THE HISTORICALLY FORMED DISTINCTIVE FEATURES OF THE STRUCTURES OF THE PARTIES' STRATEGIC FORCES. WITHIN TRIS FJIAllEWORI(, llEDUCTIOHS . SHALL APPLY TO ALL TYPES 0 OFf'EllSIVE STRATEC IHCWDINC l!&AVY lllSSILES. SOLUTION SHALL FOUND WITH REGARD TO Lt C THE DEPLO RANCE SEA- LAUNCHED CR SS I LES .

ON ALL MATTERS RE OFFENSIVE AIU'IS FOA THEIR l!llTllAL I A POLITICAL WILL TO

- - B. EXPERTS CROUP AC BER

12 . ON STRATtalC AJUIS PREPARED TO REDUCE SY l'l l'TY P&R TO AN EQUAL NUMBER or ICllMS, SLl!MS AND HEAVY BOMBERS ( APPROXIMATELY 1600) AND WARHEADS (HOT MORE nw; 6000) , TAKING INTO ACCOUNT HISTORICALLY FOllllED DISTINCTIVE FEATURES OF THE STRUCTURES or THE PARTIES' STRATEGIC FORCES. WITHIN THIS !'lU\MEWOBI(, REDUCTIONS Sl!ALL APPLY TO ALL TYPES or STRATEGIC OPFENSIVE AJUIS, IHCWDlllO A SIGNIFICANT IMlllER or HEAVY MISSILES. A MUTUALLY ACCEPTABLE SOLUTION SHALL 0 BE FOUND TO LI TING DEPLOYHEHl' or LON:l-RANCE LBAR-AIUIED SEA-CRUISE lllSSIUS.

Otl ALL llAT'IO.S RELA OFFENSIVE ARMS THE FOR THEIR l!llTllAL A POLITICAL WILL ** END OS CABLE **

-

OP IHMED OE Rl/EHC 10272 29503 0 220311Z <>er 86 Fii SECSTATE l/A,5111)(11

TO USOEL NST C£NEVA I S E C R E T STATE 330

EXOIS, USOST

E.o. 1235610ECL,OAOR

SE Alfi> SPAC

0000

SYSTEM II 90744 ATTACHMENT J

RUCTIONS

TAGS: PARM, MCAP. TSPA, NST, OST SUBJECT: (S) ADDITIONAi. CUIOANCE FOR DEFENSE ANO SPACE NECOTIATING CROUP

REF1 (A) STATE 291909; (8) STATE 29566

1. SECRET • !NrlRB TEXT.

2. FOLLOlllNG IS Al>DITIO SPACE NECOTIM:ING GltOUP PROPOSALS llAOE TO nm ING

,.

B!:TWEEN 'I1!E PRES !DENT AND OCTOBER 11• 12. THIS CU DOES NOT REPLACE CUID REFTELS (A) AND (B) SPECIFICALI..Y HOTEi)

3. THE EXISTING US PR OUIDANCE AND IN TltE P GENERAL SECRETARY 00

2

., . RAL SECRETARY IS IN ADDITI

, D&S NECOTI IOUS ROUNDS

CHEV ON • AND CROUP OF

AS ..

4. PARAGRAPH ( 4A) CO INITIAL S ROPOSAL KADE IN REYKJ'AVIK ON TllE FIRST DAY OF Tiii! DISCUSSIONS. PARAGRAPH (48) PROVIDES TBE TEXT OP Tiii! FIRST US AI..TERNATIVE PROPOSAL MADE BY Tll£ PRESIDENr TO GENERAi.. SECRETARY GORBACHEV IN REYKJAVIK ON TllE AFTERNOON OF THE SECOND DAY OF DISCUSSIONS. PAllACRAPB (4C) PROVIDES THE TEXT or THE SOVIET COUNTERPROPOSAL MADE THAT SAME AFTERNOON. PARAORAPH (4D) PROVIDES THE TEXT Of THE SECOND AND I.AST US ALTEIUIAT !IE PROPOSAL llAOE I llRlTINO BY TllE PRESIDENr. THESE PROVIDED FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE NECOT CROuP.

/\. SOVIET PROPOS/\L, STl\ENCTllEN INO THE LIMITATION OF ANT OF UllLIHITED DURAT THAT THE USSR AND THEIR RIC!IT TO lfl'l'llDRAW TEN YEARS, AND TO STRI PROVISIONS TllF.OUCHOUT ALL MISSll..E·DEFENSE SP EXCEPT FOR RESEARCH LABOllATORlt:S. THIS WO ENTAIL A

ICH IS REACHED

ISE ERIOD OF

TESTING OF SUCll FIXED LAND-BASED SYSTEl!S AND 'l'BEIR COMPOllENTS AS ARE ALl.OW&D UNDER TBE ABM TRt:ATY. SUBSEQUENTLY, WITHIN SEVERAL YEARS, TBI!! PMTIES SHALL NEGOTIATE FURl'llEll MUTUALLY ACCEPTABI..E SOLUTIONS IN THIS AR.£A. THE PARTIES DE!M IT APPROPRIATE TO UNDERTAJ:B ADDITIONAL EFFORTS WITH A VIEW TO ACHIEVE MUTUALLY ACCUTABIZ ~S BAHll ANTl·SATl:LLITE S STEHS.

·s . FIRST US PROPOSAL, AcREt: TO CC>llFI NZ Tl!EllS TESTING, WHICH IS P PERIOD OF FIVE YEAR SO PERCENT REDUCT ll£ ACHIEVED. THI TllE PACE OF RmUCTI OFFENSIVE 81\LLISTIC Ml ELIMINATION or ALL 0 END or TBB SECOND FIVE REDUCTIONS CONTINUI AT RESTRICTIONS 1111..L CONr

BER 12. 80'?8 RESEABCB, TBB A1lll

1991, D EOIC • BO'rH SPECT ro

llltll -TBB BALLISTIC Ml ERIOD. AS PROPRIATE P

APPLY. AT