Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012 Presented by:Lesego Busang(ACHAP) Onkemetse C. Ntsuape(MOH)...

21
Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012 www.aids2012.org Presented by: Lesego Busang (ACHAP) Onkemetse C. Ntsuape (MOH) EVALUATION OF SMC SHORT TERM COMMUNICATION STRATEGY - BOTSWANA ACHAP Symposium - International AIDS Conference Washington DC, USA 23 rd July 2012

Transcript of Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012 Presented by:Lesego Busang(ACHAP) Onkemetse C. Ntsuape(MOH)...

Page 1: Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012 Presented by:Lesego Busang(ACHAP) Onkemetse C. Ntsuape(MOH) EVALUATION OF SMC SHORT TERM COMMUNICATION.

Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012www.aids2012.org

Presented by: Lesego Busang (ACHAP)

Onkemetse C. Ntsuape (MOH)

EVALUATION OF SMC SHORT TERM COMMUNICATION STRATEGY -

BOTSWANA

ACHAP Symposium - International AIDS ConferenceWashington DC, USA

23rd July 2012

Page 2: Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012 Presented by:Lesego Busang(ACHAP) Onkemetse C. Ntsuape(MOH) EVALUATION OF SMC SHORT TERM COMMUNICATION.

Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012www.aids2012.org

Introduction - Overview

• SMC Adopted as HIV prevention add-on strategy 2009

• STCS Implemented since 2009

• Evaluated in September/October 2011– Inform LTCS development– Baseline

• Collaboration between MOH, ACHAP and PSI

Page 3: Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012 Presented by:Lesego Busang(ACHAP) Onkemetse C. Ntsuape(MOH) EVALUATION OF SMC SHORT TERM COMMUNICATION.

Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012www.aids2012.org

Methodology

• Cross-sectional study (September/November 2011)• Quantitative

– 2,973 males and 375 females aged 15-49 years

• Qualitative approaches– Focus group discussions (35 FGD’s)– Key Informant Interviews (32 KII)

• Basis of sampling was 2011 Census Sampling Frame ensuring:– Urban/Rural, geographical and circumcision prevalence representation

• Hence 7 health districts were sampled

Page 4: Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012 Presented by:Lesego Busang(ACHAP) Onkemetse C. Ntsuape(MOH) EVALUATION OF SMC SHORT TERM COMMUNICATION.

Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012www.aids2012.org

Circumcised more than 3 years ago

12%

Circumcised within last 3 years9%

(or 40% of Circumcised)

PLANNING on Circumcising

36%

Would ACCEPT Circumcsion23%

Would NOT Accept Circumcision

14% (or 18.2% of Uncircumcised)

Circumcised, No Data on When

1%

Don’t know if Would Accept

4%

No Response on Would Accept

1%

Circumcision Status and Intent

Page 5: Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012 Presented by:Lesego Busang(ACHAP) Onkemetse C. Ntsuape(MOH) EVALUATION OF SMC SHORT TERM COMMUNICATION.

Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012www.aids2012.org

• SMC helps reduce the chances of HIV infection (All FGD’s) * It reduces infection rate but doesn’t mean that you won’t get infected with the virus. (Gaborone females)

• SMC promotes hygiene (All FGD’s) I take it that circumcision helps one be clean; foreskin accumulates dirt and other diseases (Kweneng females)

Don't KnowOther (Specify

Can have more partnersNo need to use condoms

Increased sexual pleasureSize of penis appears smallerSize of penis appears Larger

Improved appearanceCircumcised penis hygienic

Reduces Woman's infection chancesProtection against STI

Reduces man's infection chancesPartial protection

Complete protection

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0%

1.5%

5.4%

0.1%

0.1%

3.6%

0.2%

0.4%

1.6%

26.8%

2.1%

50.9%

65.0%

21.3%

2.1%

Benefits of SMC – Males Be

nefit

s

tmoeti
1st line - is the word HIV missing t the end?
Page 6: Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012 Presented by:Lesego Busang(ACHAP) Onkemetse C. Ntsuape(MOH) EVALUATION OF SMC SHORT TERM COMMUNICATION.

Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012www.aids2012.org

Excessive bleeding – * I take it that if you cut someone’s foreskin what comes to mind would be ‘what if I lose a lot of blood and die?’ and the pain, so these things discourages them to go and circumcise. (Females FGD)

Wound does not healSwelling of penis

InfectionExcessive bleeding

Penis damagedPoor Sexual performance

DeathNo Complication

Other (Specify)Don't Know

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0%

30.6%

14.3%

14.9%

14.2%

9.4%

2.6%

8.6%

23.8%

11.3%

3.7%

Anticipated SMC Risks/Complica-tions

Percent

Ris

ks

/Co

mp

lic

ati

on

s

tmoeti
again- is this a quotation from an individual in Machaneng - or a collective view. if it's a quotation from one individual then need to state it this way.
Lesego Busang
It is a quote from an inidividual representing to dipict how strong the general view was.
Page 7: Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012 Presented by:Lesego Busang(ACHAP) Onkemetse C. Ntsuape(MOH) EVALUATION OF SMC SHORT TERM COMMUNICATION.

Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012www.aids2012.org

Fear of Pain

Don't belive in SMC

Cultural/Religious Reasons

Have not thought about it

Fear of HCT Results

Don't have enough information

Other

No time for healing process

Too Old

Not Ready

HIV Positive

36%

21%

8%

7%

6%

6%

5%

4%

2%

2%

1%

Reasons WOULD NOT accept MC if Offered

33.8

20.5

16.5

6.1

4.8

3.6

3.1

2.8

1.9

1.3

1.3

1.3

1.0

2.0

0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0

Fear for pain/complications/death

No time for process/healing period

Don’t have enough information

Don't believe/like SMC

Just havent thought of it

Facility delays/accessibility/Services

Feared for HCT results

Cultural/Religious

Not ready

Health Reasons/HIV Positive

Using Other Prevention

Beleive already old

Financial reasons

Other

Reason for NOT BEING Circumcised

Page 8: Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012 Presented by:Lesego Busang(ACHAP) Onkemetse C. Ntsuape(MOH) EVALUATION OF SMC SHORT TERM COMMUNICATION.

Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012www.aids2012.org

Health w

orker

Friend/re

lativ

e

SMC P

amphle

t

SMC P

osters

SMC B

TV Advert

SMC R

adio a

dvert

Billboard

Bus/ taxi a

dvert)

Newspaper a

dvert

Visit/

talk

s in w

orkpla

ce

Oth

er0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

29.5%

35.1%

9.6%8.1%

28.6%

49.5%

10.3%

2.0%

19.1%

3.5%

19.5%

8.9%

32.6%

1.2% 0.8% 1.7%4.0%

0.6% 0.0% 0.6% 0.9%

9.8%

Source of SMC Knowledge and Motivator to Get Circumcised

Source of SMC Knowledge

Motivation to Circumcise

Source/Motivator

Pe

rce

nt

In-cludes Sexual partner

Page 9: Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012 Presented by:Lesego Busang(ACHAP) Onkemetse C. Ntsuape(MOH) EVALUATION OF SMC SHORT TERM COMMUNICATION.

Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012www.aids2012.org

0.000

1.000

2.000

3.000

4.000

5.000

6.000

7.0006.245

3.355 3.332 3.136

1.982 1.8541.583

1.372

0.383 0.352

The odds of being Circumcised vs not being circumcised during STCS Campaign (excludes circumcised more than 3 years ago)

Od

ds

Ra

tio

2.609

2.837

2.450

2.500

2.550

2.600

2.650

2.700

2.750

2.800

2.850

2.900

Death not seen as a risk Pain during procedure not anticipated

Page 10: Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012 Presented by:Lesego Busang(ACHAP) Onkemetse C. Ntsuape(MOH) EVALUATION OF SMC SHORT TERM COMMUNICATION.

Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012www.aids2012.org

Don't belie

ve/li

ke (v

s HCT F

ear)

Cultural

/Relig

ious (vs

HCT Fear)

Other (vs

HCT Fear)

Fear

pain/co

mplicati

ons/death

(vs H

CT)

Provides C

omplete Protection

HCT need prio

r SMC

Employe

d

Hygiene benefit k

nowledge0.000

10.00020.00030.00040.00050.00060.00070.00080.00090.000

100.00091.305

75.296

17.886

8.656 6.8040.434 0.361 0.355

Odds of "Would NOT Accept SMC" if offered

Tested for HIV and booked clients still not showing up in large num-bersEver tested for HIV already too high to have an impact; fewer people don’t know their HIV status.

3.07

2.3022.769 2.815

.000

1.000

2.000

3.000

4.000

5.000

6.000

7.000

No knowledge on HCT need prior SMC

Unemployed No knowledge on hygiene benefit

tmoeti
seems like a potentially complex slide. HCT features prominently - so might we not want this in the title? may help the presenter if we did.
Lesego Busang
It the opposite of the last 3 variables. So it part of this chat in reverse.
Page 11: Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012 Presented by:Lesego Busang(ACHAP) Onkemetse C. Ntsuape(MOH) EVALUATION OF SMC SHORT TERM COMMUNICATION.

Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012www.aids2012.org

Recommendations• Strive to achieve high levels of correct knowledge.• Develop targeted messaging for identified gaps; ie

for concerns on “pain/complications” and “believes”• Use circumcised men to respond to perceptions on pain.

• Educate communities on use of local anesthesia to address pain.

• Explore use of non-surgical devices; ie PrePex.

• Increase use of interpersonal communications.• Promote other SMC benefits such as cleanliness.• Develop/customize messages to local context.• Strategically assign mobilizers to communities. • Empower leaders on SMC facts (buy-in and cultural concerns).

• Pilot materials extensively before roll out.

Page 12: Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012 Presented by:Lesego Busang(ACHAP) Onkemetse C. Ntsuape(MOH) EVALUATION OF SMC SHORT TERM COMMUNICATION.

Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012www.aids2012.org

Credits and Acknowledgements:• Health Education Officers• Districts Health Management Teams• Community leaders• Study Participants

THANK YOU

Page 13: Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012 Presented by:Lesego Busang(ACHAP) Onkemetse C. Ntsuape(MOH) EVALUATION OF SMC SHORT TERM COMMUNICATION.

Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012www.aids2012.org

Evaluation Objectives

• Establish the extent to which the objectives of the STCS were met; ie establish if– the general public is informed about the Government of

Botswana/Ministry of Health/ position on SMC as an HIV prevention strategy.

– men currently seeking SMC services at health facilities have adequate information on SMC

– service providers at health facilities and the media personnel have capacity to disseminate and report correct and accurate messages on SMC and HIV prevention to the general public.

– political and social leaders at all levels advocate for SMC.– SMC stakeholders effectively communicate facts on SMC in line with

the SMC short term communication strategy.• Provide a baseline levels for the role out of SMC in Botswana• Provide Knowledge, Attitudes and Practice (KAP) levels. 

Page 14: Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012 Presented by:Lesego Busang(ACHAP) Onkemetse C. Ntsuape(MOH) EVALUATION OF SMC SHORT TERM COMMUNICATION.

Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012www.aids2012.org

One week after2%

Two/Three weeks after5%

Four/five weeks after13%

Six wks or more80%

Period before starting sex

Page 15: Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012 Presented by:Lesego Busang(ACHAP) Onkemetse C. Ntsuape(MOH) EVALUATION OF SMC SHORT TERM COMMUNICATION.

Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012www.aids2012.org

Continued using; 83%

Reduced/ Stopped, 7%

Other; 4%

Increased; 3% Started; 1% Continued not using; 1%

Condom use change after SMC

Page 16: Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012 Presented by:Lesego Busang(ACHAP) Onkemetse C. Ntsuape(MOH) EVALUATION OF SMC SHORT TERM COMMUNICATION.

Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012www.aids2012.org

Circum

cise

d durin

g Cam

paign

Circum

cise

d bef

ore C

ampai

gn0.0%

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0% 60.6%

50.0%

31.1% 26.2%

8.3%

23.8%

Change in number of sexual partners after Circumcision by period of circumcision

Stayed the same

Decreased

Increased

Period circumcised

Pe

rce

nt

Page 17: Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012 Presented by:Lesego Busang(ACHAP) Onkemetse C. Ntsuape(MOH) EVALUATION OF SMC SHORT TERM COMMUNICATION.

Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012www.aids2012.org

Now feel

pro

tect

ed fr

om H

IV

Condom a

vaila

bility

/affo

rdab

ility

Mat

urity

Sexual

var

iety

/des

ire

Separ

ated

or c

ircum

cise

d pre

deb

ut

Other

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

7.4 7.4

29.6

7.4

33.3

14.8

Reason for increasing number of sexual partners

Reason

Perc

ent

Page 18: Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012 Presented by:Lesego Busang(ACHAP) Onkemetse C. Ntsuape(MOH) EVALUATION OF SMC SHORT TERM COMMUNICATION.

Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012www.aids2012.org

Conclusions Cont.• Generally the higher the knowledge levels the better the results;,

regardless of whether the knowledge is on a negative factor or not; ie NO KNOWLEDGE of HCT as a requirement for SMC did not have negative impact on SMC uptake. – It is important to increase knowledge across all SMC facts. – Hence strive to achieve high levels of correct knowledge (deemed

positive or negative knowledge), to take advantage of positive outcomes brought about by higher knowledge.

• Fear for pain/complications/death is a key challenge that needs to be addressed.

• Interpersonal communications are important vehicles for SMC message delivery and motivators to SMC.– However radio provides the best coverage.

• Community leaders are willing to mobilize for the program but are not empowered.

Page 19: Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012 Presented by:Lesego Busang(ACHAP) Onkemetse C. Ntsuape(MOH) EVALUATION OF SMC SHORT TERM COMMUNICATION.

Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012www.aids2012.org

SAMPLE SLIDE 2

• Speaking at AIDS 2012• What to think about?

– Keep it simple– Larger text is easier to read– Single words rather than sentences

• Bullet points are there to remind you, not to tell the whole story

Page 20: Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012 Presented by:Lesego Busang(ACHAP) Onkemetse C. Ntsuape(MOH) EVALUATION OF SMC SHORT TERM COMMUNICATION.

Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012www.aids2012.org

SAMPLE SLIDE 3

Page 21: Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012 Presented by:Lesego Busang(ACHAP) Onkemetse C. Ntsuape(MOH) EVALUATION OF SMC SHORT TERM COMMUNICATION.

Washington D.C., USA, 22-27 July 2012www.aids2012.org

SAMPLE SLIDE 4

• Credits and Acknowledgements• List credits and acknowledgements

– Insert organization credits acknowledgements as opposed to individuals

– Insert Organization logo’s where required and with the permission of the organizations being acknowledged.