Wandl_Alexander_Putting territories-in-between on the map

7/20SpatialPlanning

&Strategy@ BEYOND THE EDGE - Melbourne 2013Challenge the Future

7/29

Zwischenstadt (1997) - ‘where we live now’ (sieverts, t. 2008)

8/20SpatialPlanning


8/29

città diffusa - veneto - italy - (secchi, B. & viganò, P. 1990)

9/20SpatialPlanning


9/29

tyrol city - austria - (andexlinger et al. 2005)

16/20SpatialPlanning


16/29

learning from The eU/oeCD - Urban rUral Typology

Major Limitations

focus on living population - missing out the working population.

no consideration of functional relations (i. e. commuting) and infrastructure that facilitates these relations.

administrative boundaries as aggregation units.

Major Advantages

easy to replicate.

all necessary data is publicly available.



17/29

Urban Morphological Zones (UMZ) based on CORINE land cover classification

Primarily used to assess land cover change and the extend of urban growth (sprawl).

Resolution 100 m pixel - UMZs are defined as built-up areas lying less than 200 m apart.

Following core land cover classes:• ‘Continuous urban fabric’ • ‘Discontinuous urban fabric’ • ‘Industrial or commercial units’ • ‘Green urban areas’

and port areas - airports and- sport and leisure, if they are neighbours of the core classes.

and road and rail networks and water courses, if they are located within 300 m.

and forest and scrub areas, if they are completely encircled by one or more of the four core classes.

brInGInG TIb on The MaP - learnInG FroM oTher ClassIFICaTIons



19/29

Peri-urban Land Use RELationships – Strategies and Sustainability Assess-ment Tools for Urban – Rural Linkages (PLUREL)

European integrated research project within the European Commissions sixth framework pro-gramme. (2007 -2011)

Peri-urban areas as ‘discontinuous built develop-ment, containing settlements of less than 20,000, with an average density of at least 40 persons per km2 (averaged over 1 km2 cells)’ (Piorr et al., 2011: 10) . Together with the urban area (continuous and cities with over 20,000 population) and the rural hinterland (less than 40 inhabitants per square kilometer) they form the rural-urban region (Piorr et al., 2011:25).

bringing Tib on ThE MaP - lEarning froM oThEr ClassifiCaTions

(a) Mono-centric settlement pattern (text book version)

(b) Poly-centric settlement pattern (semi-realistic version)

Urban area(continuous & over 20,000 population)

Peri-urban area(discontinuous & over 40 persons / hectare)

City centre Inner urban Suburban

Urban fringeUrban periphery

Rural hinterland

Built up area

Functional Urban Area

Rural-urban-region

Multiple combinations of urban & peri-urban areas



28/29

bringing Tib on The Map - across europe

Population Area

Population Density

Total area

in TiB

Total area Area in TiB

Total area in TiB

Case study name absolute

absolute %

In square m In square m %

persons/km2 persons/km2

Île-de-France 3.893.228

1.006.492 25,85

2.025.000.000 1.096.806.816 54,16

1.922,6 917,7

South-Holland 2.849.336

1.267.325 44,48

2.025.000.000 1.089.876.052 53,82

1.407,1 1.162,8

The Tyrol 281.199

203.066 72,21

2.025.000.000 379.238.037 18,73

138,9 535,5

North Somerset 736.265

562.595 76,41

2.025.000.000 790.280.594 39,03

363,6 711,9

Vienna-Bratislava 338.470

266.489 78,73

2.025.000.000 735.792.433 36,34

167,1 362,2

Gelderland 1.031.570

832.782 80,73

2.025.000.000 1.083.619.161 53,51

509,4 768,5

Bergamo-Brescia 1.094.195

913.480 83,48

2.025.000.000 1.051.089.125 51,91

540,3 869,1

Veneto 1.052.495

888.305 84,40

2.025.000.000 1.299.205.096 64,16

519,8 683,7

South Wales 987.624

888.662 89,98

2.025.000.000 966.270.906 47,72

487,7 919,7

Pas-de-Calais 970.905

913.379 94,08

2.025.000.000 1.205.529.643 59,53

479,5 757,7



29/29

Location pattern of centralities and street network properties Primal graph

Dual graph

Next StePS - ComPariSoN of

Permeability of the landscape

Landscape fragmentation

accessibility of green spaces

Policy responses

Landscape fragmentation

accessibility of green spaces

0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,40,05Kilometerslow high

Network Centrality

Bet

wee

nnes

s 50

0 m

wei

ghte

d G

FAR

each

500

m n

ot w

eigh

ted

Aalsmeer Hoofddorp Centrum Hoofddorp Genderenplein

Wandl_Alexander_Putting territories-in-between on the map

Art & Photos

Transcript of Wandl_Alexander_Putting territories-in-between on the map