Waikato Spatial Plan - Summary Report FINAL€¦ · 10. Key Regional Strengths, Challenges and...
Transcript of Waikato Spatial Plan - Summary Report FINAL€¦ · 10. Key Regional Strengths, Challenges and...
Waikato Spatial Plan
Summary Report
February 2014
Table of Contents
1. Summary 1
2. Introduction 6
2.1 Background 6
2.2 Purpose 6
2.3 Context 6
2.3 Spatial Planning Approach 8
2.4 Risk and Resilience 10
3. The Waikato’s Changing Spatial Structure 11
3.1 Significant Drivers of Change 11
3.2 Population and Demographics 12
3.3 Land Use Trends 13
3.4 Urban Form 13
3.5 Our Cultural Heritage 14
4. Forecasted Regional Demographic Changes 16
5. Critical Infrastructure that Supports our Communities 19
6. Spatial Planning 24
7. Findings of Well-Being Evidence Base 27
7.1 Economic Well-Being 28
7.2 Social Well-Being 30
7.3 Cultural Well-Being 31
7.4 Environmental Well-Being 32
7.5 Infrastructure 35
7.6 High Level Linkages 36
8. Methodology to Categorise Regional Strengths, Challenges and Opportunities 38
8.1 Criteria 38
8.2 National, regional and sub-regional strengths, challenges and opportunities 39
9. Outcomes from Council Workshops 45
10. Key Regional Strengths, Challenges and Opportunities 46
10.1 Key Matters for the Waikato Region 46
10.2 The Headline Strengths, Challenges and Opportunities 47
11. Conclusions and Recommendations 49
11.1 Conclusions 49
11.2 Recommendations 51
Appendix 1: Business Case for Waikato Spatial Plan 52
Appendix 2: List of Technical Reports 58
Appendix 3: Assessment of Critical Infrastructure for the Waikato 59
Appendix 4: Assessment of Strengths, Challenges and Opportunities 65
1
1. Summary
Purpose and Context
The purpose of this Report is to summarise the findings of the work undertaken to date and to
identify high priority issues which the Waikato Region can have a collective voice on. This report
is a summary of comprehensive technical reports which have been developed for the Waikato
Spatial Plan project on demographics, economic, social, cultural and environmental well-being,
and infrastructure.
This Summary Report will be an important communication for the Waikato Region. It will inform
discussions on strategic collaboration between local authorities, infrastructure providers,
communities and the Crown, and can be considered the Mayoral Forum’s communication to the
Waikato on the rationale for a Waikato Spatial Plan, including the core strengths, challenges and
opportunities that should be considered in the Spatial Plan project.
This Spatial Planning work is being developed in a context of central government objectives
around building a more productive, competitive economy and better public services. It is also
being developed at a time of Local Government legislation changes and reorganisation
proposals. The consistent themes that have emerged from these reforms are:
� Improving the efficiency and effectiveness of local government
� Enhancing economic development
� Providing value for money
Benefits of Spatial Planning
There is a need to provide a mechanism within which efficiency and effective collaboration on
priority issues and responses across the Waikato can be achieved – that mechanism is the
Waikato Spatial Plan.
There are significant gains to be made and potential benefits in undertaking spatial planning for
the region. This includes:
� Enhanced coordination of ‘Whole of Government’ investment – efficiency savings by
acting collectively with central Government on high priority issues
� Improving coordination of Government, Regional and Local policy
� Consistency with where the Local Government Commission is heading in terms of
speaking with one region-wide voice, strategic long-term planning, simplified and
streamlined processes and efficiency initiatives such as shared services
� Efficiency savings for NZ Inc and Waikato Ratepayers (cost savings could be anywhere
from 40 to 50 million over 10 years just for having fewer plans, policies, bylaws and
common planning procedures)1
� A framework for central government engagement (eg to increase awareness of the
implications of rural depopulation and the economic and social impacts of rural service
decline)
1 A Business Case for Completing the Waikato Plan, January 2013
2
When the Waikato Region has acted in a collective manner, this has proven to be effective when
seeking additional Government investment. Recent examples include:
� Collective action by the Waikato Regional Transport Committee secured $215M of
Crown Funding for land transport initiatives, which has been largely invested in the
Waikato Expressway and doubling the capacity of the East Coast Main Trunk Line.
� Consistent advocacy over 15 years or more that the $2 billion Waikato Expressway is the
region’s number one transport priority – the Expressway is a Road of National
Significance and is targeted for completion in 2019.
� Doubling the capacity of the East Coast Main Trunk Line as a result of the Crown Grant –
a $13 million project which has supported Fonterra expanding capacity at the Crawford
St inland port and provides important links to Ruakura supporting the business case for
an inland port.
� Lake Taupo Protection Trust secured a combined fund of $81M to reduce nitrogen
leaching into Lake Taupo over 15 years.
� Waikato-Tainui’s River Settlement with the Government – the Waikato River Authority
administers a combined fund of $220M to restore and protect the health and wellbeing
of the Waikato River – this is unique to the Waikato and is an example of collaborative
relationships to achieve better service delivery.
Headline Regional Strengths, Challenges and Opportunities
The Waikato region is diverse, with different issues, conditions and interests across the region.
Consequently, opportunities for strategic local government collaboration exist on three different
levels; the macro or national level, regional level, and sub-regional level.
The technical reports which underpin this Summary Report have identified key strengths,
challenges and opportunities for the Waikato region. A methodology has been developed which
identifies the matters which are nationally, regionally or sub-regionally significant. This will help
the Spatial Plan to identify priority areas for local government to collaborate on.
The assessment undertaken using the methodology has identified a number of strengths,
challenges and opportunities. While they are all important there are too many for the region to
focus on at once. The table below identifies some ‘headline’ strengths, challenges and
opportunities that the region can focus on now and that can be used as the basis for developing
a spatial plan.
Strengths
� Nationally significant transport juncture and connections to Auckland and
Tauranga
The region is a nationally significant juncture for freight and transport, and
has good connections to large and growing populations in Auckland and
Tauranga. The transport network in the Waikato region is vital to the
nation’s economic prosperity as it provides important access for freight and
people to key destinations including major urban centres, ports, industry,
sub-regional employment centres and tourism locations. The Waikato has a
good quality road transport network including two of the busiest rail lines in
New Zealand.
3
� Contribution to national economy through important industry sectors
The Waikato region has a significant proportion of New Zealand’s export-
facing industries. Dairy, meat, forestry, aquaculture, agri-business, tourism,
education, energy and mining/quarrying are already the largest
contributors to economic growth. The Waikato region is responsible for
about a third of New Zealand’s dairy production.
� Hamilton as the Waikato centre for innovation, employment and services
Hamilton city makes the most significant contribution to the region’s gross
domestic product (GDP), at an estimated 45 per cent and its estimated GDP
per capita in 2012 was both the highest in the region and higher than the
national average. It is the region’s “central business district” with
concentrations of employment, research, tertiary education and
manufacturing. Hamilton’s industry strengths are inextricably linked to the
primary production of the surrounding region.
Challenges
� Declining rural populations and associated decline in services
Ongoing rural depopulation is leading to altered local demand and
consumption patterns affecting the provision, location and affordability of
services (eg schools, retail, health care, leisure and transport).
� An ageing population and shrinking skill base
Except for a handful of territorial areas, all foreseeable growth in New
Zealand will be at 65+ years, and most will see decline in other age groups.
Every year for the next 15 years a successively larger cohort will retire (or
reduce its participation) and will be 'replaced' by a successively smaller
cohort at labour market entry age, driving an increase in competition for
labour and presumably labour costs.
� Water quality and water allocation
The health of the region’s fresh water bodies is declining - particularly in
terms of nutrient concentrations and health for aquatic organisms.
Competition for water is also an issue. A significant proportion of the
region’s surface water resources are already fully allocated meaning that
there is little available for additional users.
� Economic inequalities across the region
Economic growth has been uneven across the territorial authorities in the
region. There has been variation in GDP growth, employee counts and
income levels. This poses a challenge if we want economic growth in the
region to raise the living standards and well-being of all residents and
economies, not just a select few.
Opportunities � Maximising opportunities, including investment, through aligned planning
The Region currently has over 640 non-RMA strategies, policies and plans,
and a wide range of policies and standards within existing District Plans.
There are opportunities, including through the development of a Spatial
Plan, to align the planning frameworks which will assist local authorities and
key stakeholders to identify strategic opportunities, recognise any trade-
offs and make strategic policy decisions on high priority issues. There are
potentially significant cost and service delivery efficiencies to be achieved
through an aligned planning approach.
4
� Leveraging Maori development
Māori economic participation and investment offers significant potential for
the Waikato region. Waikato iwi are active investors in the region. There
are opportunities to partner with Māori/iwi for economic development due
to their unique advantages and long-term commitment to the future of the
region and its people.
� Connectivity to the Upper North Island
The Waikato region lies at the productive heart of New Zealand’s economic
engine room, the population and economic growth area of the Upper North
Island (Waikato, Bay of Plenty, Auckland and Northland). The Waikato’s
transport connections in particular can facilitate the growth of the Upper
North Island. The region has nationally significant road and rail
infrastructure and important connections to the Ports in Auckland and
Tauranga.
Before the future emphasis of the headline regional strengths, challenges and opportunities is
finally confirmed, there is a need to undertake as the first stage of the Phase 2 spatial plan
development, a three dimensional layering exercise to better understand how these outcomes
impact on each other from a four well-beings perspective.
Conclusions and Recommendations
The research work undertaken to date indicates if a spatial plan is commissioned for the
Waikato Region with a number of specific outcomes clearly defined, the document will provide a
useful tool for performance improvement, speaking with one voice and having a clearly agreed
regional direction.
While the detail of a spatial plan is yet to come it is a process which will provide a framework for
ongoing joined up thinking.
The next step is for the Waikato Mayoral Forum to determine the value of developing a full
Spatial Plan for the Region, using the data contained in the technical reports as a starting point
for a collaborative discussion.
A Spatial Plan represents a significant opportunity for the Waikato region and its communities,
and one which may not arise again given the current operating climate. Failure to collaborate
strategically may potentially expose the region to a number of risks and costs. The region needs
to use the spatial plan process to set some priorities and progress these through phase 2 of the
project.
The Mayoral Forum has received a significant amount of quality information and advice.
However, unless there is commitment to moving forward, particularly in terms of the headline
strengths, challenges and opportunities identified, the benefits of having completed all of the
technical work and the opportunity to align with the Government’s policy and operational
context, will be lost.
This report has made the following recommendations to the Mayoral Forum:
5
1. Agree that the identified national, regional and sub-regional issues set out in Section 8.2
are the basis for moving to the next phase of this project
2. Agree that the headline strengths, challenges and opportunities outlined in section 10.2
should form the basis for scoping phase 2, noting that a spatial layering exercise will be
undertaken at the outset of this phase.
3. Agree that based on the analysis undertaken and conclusions reached in this report,
Phase 2 of this project to prepare a Waikato Spatial Plan proceed.
4. Agree to prepare a project plan containing scope, timeframes, resources, cost sharing
and possible governance arrangements.
5. Agree to adopt the project plan in conjunction with the partner Councils no later than
April 2014.
6
2. Introduction 2.1 Background
The Waikato Mayoral Forum is currently overseeing four key work streams which cover roading;
water and wastewater services; planning; and economic development. These work streams are
an integrated package aimed at getting the best out of the regional economy and delivering
significant cost savings.
This summary report relates to the planning work stream which has a primary focus on
developing a Spatial Plan for the Waikato region. The key steps towards developing the Waikato
Spatial Plan are set out below.
This Summary Report forms part of Phase 1 – developing a common evidence base within the
region.
2.2 Purpose
The main purpose of this Report is to summarise the findings of the work undertaken to date
and to identify high priority issues which the Waikato Region can have a collective voice on. This
report is a summary of comprehensive technical reports which have been developed for the
Waikato Spatial Plan project on demographics, economic, social, cultural and environmental
well-being, and infrastructure. Reference should be had to these reports for detailed
information.
This Summary Report will be an important communication for the Waikato Region. It will inform
discussions on strategic collaboration between local authorities, infrastructure providers,
communities and the Crown, and can be considered the Mayoral Forum’s communication to the
Waikato on the rationale for a Waikato Spatial Plan, including the core strengths, challenges and
opportunities that should be considered in the Spatial Plan project.
2.3 Context
This Spatial Planning work is being developed in a context of central government objectives
around building a more productive, competitive economy and better public services. It is also
being developed at a time of Local Government legislation changes and reorganisation
proposals.
Government has set the following key priorities:
� to responsibly manage the Government’s finances;
7
� to build a more competitive and productive economy;
� to deliver better public services to New Zealanders, within the tight budgets the
Government is operating under; and
� to support the rebuilding of Christchurch.
Within the ‘building a more competitive and productive economy’ priority the focus areas are:
� export markets
� innovation
� skilled and safe workplaces
� infrastructure
� natural resources; and
� capital markets.
The work of the Mayoral Forum and this spatial plan project picks up on a number of these
priority areas.
In November 2013 the Local Government Act 2002 Amendment Bill (No 3) was introduced. The
Bill proposes a range of changes to the Act to make better provision for effective processes and
governance arrangements, fair and efficient decision-making and charging practices, and sound
asset management planning.
The reforms include:
� Allowing the Auckland local boards governance model to be applied more widely, as an
option that can be considered by the Local Government Commission during any
reorganisation of local government
� Measures to encourage and facilitate shared services, joint delivery, and other
collaborative arrangements between councils
A new, focused consultation document for long-term and annual plans, and reduced
duplication between these plans
� Removing most of the Act's requirements to use the special consultative procedure and
modernising this procedure to accommodate new techniques for communicating and
consulting with the public
� Requiring a new infrastructure strategy to be incorporated into long-term plans
(identifying significant infrastructure issues for a council over a 30-year period)
� Significant changes to development contributions
Auckland is the only area in recent times to have undergone significant local government
reorganisation as a result of the findings of the Royal Commission on Auckland. The seven
existing city and district councils and the Regional Council were merged into a new unitary
authority. Under the Local Government (Auckland Council) Act 2009, Auckland was required to
produce a spatial plan which it has now adopted. Section 79 of that Act sets out important
requirements for spatial planning in Auckland which the Waikato will need to be cognisant of.
The Local Government Act was also amended in 2012 and the purpose of Local Government
changed from one focused on the four well-beings to one which has a narrower focus:
(a) to enable democratic local decision-making and action by, and on behalf of,
communities; and
(b) to meet the current and future needs of communities for good-quality local
infrastructure, local public services, and performance of regulatory functions in a way
that is most cost-effective for households and businesses.
8
However the principles for local authorities still include a sustainable development approach
which takes account of social, economic, and cultural interests of people and communities, the
need to maintain and enhance the quality of the environment and the reasonably foreseeable
needs of future generations.
The 2012 Act also changed the process for reorganising local government. The changes meant
that anyone can now apply for a local government reorganisation. To date there have been four
applications and two proposals issued by the Local Government Commission. The two proposals
relate to Northland and the Hawkes Bay.
The three key planning statutes for local government (the Resource Management Act, the Local
Government Act and the Land Transport Management Act) are all progressing or have
progressed through a series of reforms. The consistent themes throughout these reforms are:
� Improving the efficiency and effectiveness of local government
� Enhancing economic development
� Providing value for money
2.3 Spatial Planning Approach
Spatial planning gives geographical expression to the economic, social, cultural and ecological
policies of society.2 It is an instrument used to manage ‘sustainable development’ of a town, city,
region or even a country. Spatial planning is about shaping economic, social, cultural and
environmental dimensions of society through ‘place making’.3
The primary objective for the Waikato Spatial Plan will be:
To contribute to the Waikato’s social, economic, environmental, and cultural well-being through
a comprehensive and effective long-term (30-year) strategy for Waikato’s growth and
development.
The Spatial Plan will also:
1. Develop a shared vision and collective voice on the high priority regional and sub-
regional issues that will improve the quality of living for people and communities in the
Waikato over the next 30-years.
2. Develop and implement the Waikato Plan will provide an important opportunity to
identify, negotiate and agree on priorities and actions across multiple parties including
local and central government, the private sector and non-government organisations.
3. Provide a shared evidence base from which to make investment and policy decisions
that are efficient and effective in a collective way;
4. Help define communities of interest that cross local authority boundaries such as labour
markets, catchment management, co-management and freight and logistics;
5. Enable a conversation on enduring governance frameworks required to support the
development and implementation of the Waikato Plan and its vision for the region;
6. Provide a framework for establishing strong partnerships with Tāngata Whenua and the
community;
2 European Regional / Spatial Planning Charter (Torremolinos Charter), 1983
3 A potential strategic spatial planning model for the Waikato Region – Research Report, Jan Huijbers, December 2011
9
7. Improve the efficiency and effectiveness of local authorities, central government and
communities to address high priority issues;
8. Help to rationalise the existing planning and service delivery system for people and
communities; and
9. Provide opportunities for linkages with other regions and support the growth of the
Upper North Island economy.
There are significant gains to be made and potential benefits in undertaking spatial planning for
the region. This includes:
� Enhanced coordination of ‘Whole of Government’ investment – efficiency savings by
acting collectively with central Government on high priority issues
� Improving coordination of Government, Regional and Local policy
� Providing a clear public / private sector strategic policy direction for investment
certainty
� Consistency with where the Local Government Commission is heading in terms of
speaking with one region-wide voice, strategic long-term planning, simplified and
streamlined processes and efficiency initiatives such as shared services
� Efficiency savings for NZ Inc and Waikato Ratepayers (cost savings could be anywhere
from 40 to 50 million over 10 years just for having fewer plans, policies, bylaws and
common planning procedures)4
� A framework for central government engagement (eg to increase awareness of the
implications of rural depopulation and the economic and social impacts of rural service
decline)
When the Waikato Region has acted in a collective manner, this has proven to be effective when
seeking additional Government investment. Recent examples include:
� Collective action by the Waikato Regional Transport Committee secured $215M of
Crown Funding for land transport initiatives, which has been largely invested in the
Waikato Expressway and doubling the capacity of the East Coast Main Trunk Line.
� Consistent advocacy over 15 years or more that the $2 billion Waikato Expressway is the
region’s number one transport priority – the Expressway is a Road of National
Significance and is targeted for completion in 2019.
� Doubling the capacity of the East Coast Main Trunk Line as a result of the Crown Grant –
a $13 million project which has supported Fonterra expanding capacity at the Crawford
St inland port and provides important links to Ruakura supporting the business case for
an inland port.
� Lake Taupo Protection Trust secured a combined fund of $81M to reduce nitrogen
leaching into Lake Taupo over 15 years.
� Waikato-Tainui’s River Settlement with the Government – the Waikato River Authority
administers a combined fund of $220M to restore and protect the health and wellbeing
of the Waikato River - this is unique to the Waikato and is an example of collaborative
relationships to achieve better service delivery.
4 A Business Case for Completing the Waikato Plan, January 2013
10
There are also future emerging opportunities which have been supported by the Mayoral
Forum. These include:
� The Waikato Sport and Recreation Facilities Plan – Opportunities for collaborative
investment and partnering with community funders and Sport NZ
� Creative Industries Plan – Opportunities for regional collaboration and investment
There are a number of future opportunities that are likely to emerge from these two processes.
A Business Case for completing a spatial plan for the Waikato has been completed. This is
attached as Appendix 1. The diagram below illustrates how the business case and an analysis of
the benefits of spatial planning has then led into the evidence-based research and the four well-
being reports that are summarised in this report. These elements will then underpin the
development of a full spatial plan for the Waikato.
2.4 Risk and Resilience
There can be a number of risks facing regions, including:
� Economic risks
� Environmental risks
� Natural hazards
� Climate
Spatial planning can help to manage risk and uncertainty through strategy and implementation
frameworks that that identify risk factors and map out how individuals, communities and
organisations can respond.
Like any strategy, spatial planning is susceptible to changing circumstances. It is important that
any spatial plan for the Waikato is adaptable when things change significantly. This includes
changing growth rates, cataclysmic world events and other global changes. The Strategy will
need to be kept current and relevant. This can be achieved through robust and ongoing
monitoring.
A well applied spatial plan provides a framework for having a joined-up conversation about what
needs to be done to address risk.
Business Case /
Benefits of Spatial
Planning
Research / Four Well-
beings Reports Spatial Plan
11
3. The Waikato’s Changing Spatial Structure
The overview provided below of the Waikato region’s changing spatial structure paints a picture
of:
� Global and national trends that are having an impact on the region and are likely to
continue to do so
� Increasing urbanisation
� Changing patterns of land use over time (particularly to more intensified dairy)
� Significant pressures for development in some parts of the region
� The ongoing growth of Hamilton City
� Significant differences between the local authority areas of the region
� Ongoing population growth for the region generally but an ageing population structure
� Strong cultural heritage and recent important shifts in terms of Treaty of Waitangi
settlements and co-management
3.1 Significant Drivers of Change
While the Waikato faces its own regional challenges, there is also a need to be cognisant of
global trends and drivers of change and to ensure the region is planning for these changes. The
following are some significant external drivers of change or trends5 that may impact the
Waikato:
� Continuing globalisation
� Climate change
� Rapidly evolving technology
� Global insecurity
� Urbanisation
� Changing population structures, particularly ageing of the population
There are also national drivers of change which are having an increasing influence on local
government, such as:
� Maintaining essential services and resources within strict financial parameters
� Increasing pressure from communities for enhanced services and service levels
� Maintaining and developing the region’s competitive advantages
� Growth and strength of the Maori economy6
� Increasing pressure for natural resources
5 Adapted from a variety of sources, including: Mega Trends – Global and National Trends Affecting Regional Prospects,
Infometrics, 2011; Wellington Region Councils Governance Review, 2010, Price Waterhouse Coopers; Waikato Regional Land Transport Strategy 2011-2041
6 The Maori economy includes assets owned and income earned by Maori – including collectively-owned trusts and
incorporations, Maori-owned businesses, service providers and the housing owned by Maori (definition sourced from New Zealand Institute of Economic Research, Maori Economic Development, 2003 at page 7).
12
There are a number of futures that the spatial plan may need to cater for. Often decisions are
made globally which affect New Zealand. These are large-scale international influences that in
the most part are beyond regional control. It is assumed that the trends identified in this
section will continue, and that the spatial plan will need to be flexible in order to be able to
respond and adapt to these changes.
3.2 Population and Demographics7
In a number of ways the demographic changes for the Waikato region are not that different
from New Zealand as a whole. However, there are some sharp differences between local
authorities.
The population of the Waikato Region has grown steadily over the past twenty-five years, from
325,220 in 1986 to approximately 416,200 in 2012, an increase of 28 per cent. Steady growth is
anticipated to continue with the population reaching approximately 469,910 by 2031 (13.8 per
cent above 2011). Eighty-three per cent of the growth is projected to be at 65+ years. Figure 1
below shows population growth of the region from 1986 to 2012.
Figure 1: Population of Waikato Region, 1986 – 2012
Hamilton City has consistently comprised the largest proportion of the region’s population,
increasing its share from 29.0 per cent in 1986 to 35.6 per cent in 2012. The city’s population
increased by 55.4 per cent over the period 1986-2012, thereby also contributing to the majority
of the region’s growth (58.0 per cent) and offsetting decline in South Waikato and Waitomo
(19.7 and 9.3 per cent respectively). The greatest overall growth was experienced by Waikato
District (77.4 per cent, contributing 31.0 per cent to the region’s growth—a small portion of
which reflects the 2010 boundary change), followed by Waipa which experienced a growth of
29.9 per cent (contributing 11.7 per cent). Noticeable growth was also seen in Thames-
Coromandel (24.3 per cent), Taupo (18.2 per cent), and Hauraki (17.9 per cent), which together
contributed 14.7 per cent of the region’s growth. Otorohanga experienced negligible growth
(0.7 per cent).
7 The material contained in this section is derived from Waikato Region – Demographic Profile 1986 – 2031, University of
Waikato, July 2013
13
The main component of the Waikato Region’s growth has been natural increase, with net
migration losses in the early 1990s and across the 1997-2001 period partially offsetting that
growth.
3.3 Land Use Trends
The Waikato is a region of many small towns, pockets of lifestyle blocks, extensive coastlines,
rich agricultural landscapes, forest-clad mountain ranges, cold deserts and geothermal features.
The five most significant current and future land use changes in the region are:
� Forestry to dairy / pasture
� Current dairy to intensified dairy (ie larger farms and increased production per hectare)
� Land being used for renewable energy
� Pasture to forestry (this is likely to be cyclical)
� Any land to urban / rural residential / infrastructure
3.4 Urban Form
The Waikato region has low population density and often wide separation of uses.
Hamilton is the region’s only city and is the most significant centre of commercial, cultural and
social activity. The importance of the city to the Waikato region cannot be overstated. The
region is also dominated by a number of small towns and villages that play a significant role. It is
also important to acknowledge the role of the rural hinterland to the City – they are mutually
beneficial.
Several growth management strategies completed within the Waikato region provide a good
indication of future land use patterns for key growth areas. The main growth areas as identified
in these strategies are:
� Taupo: Most of the growth will be centred on Taupo Town and to the North, including
Kinloch.
� Thames-Coromandel: The three main urban hubs which development will be concentrated
in are Thames, Whitianga and Whangamata.
� Hamilton, Waikato and Waipa (Future Proof sub-region): Growth will be concentrated in
Hamilton City, Cambridge, Te Awamutu, Kihikihi, Huntly, Ngaruawahia, Raglan, Te
Kauwhata, Tuakau and Pokeno.8
There are also a number of other important towns that are recognised in local planning
documents.
The Waikato has experienced rapid development of urban, rural and coastal subdivisions in
some parts of the region.9 Development pressures in the Waikato region are generally highest
on the most productive land, and often in the most sensitive landscapes. Lifestyle subdivisions
8 In 2010 the Waikato District expanded to include the areas of Tuakau and Pokeno as a result of the Auckland boundary adjustments. The Future Proof Strategy was developed prior to this change of boundary and therefore did not include the expanded Waikato District area. However, it is accepted that Tuakau and Pokeno are potential growth areas for the Waikato District.
9 Development pressures and subdivision information sourced from Waikato Regional Council using NZ Census of Population and Dwellings, Statistics NZ
14
are rapidly spreading along the banks of the Waikato River, around Lake Taupo and in many
other areas of high visual amenity. Many coastal areas, such as parts of the Coromandel
Peninsula and Raglan, are experiencing significant pressure for development. Figure 2 below
illustrates the rate of lifestyle and subdivision development in the Waikato region between 2009
and 2013. While at first glance the development activity appears quite scattered, it is also
evident that there are areas of intense pressure, such as in the Future Proof sub-region10,
Thames-Coromandel and on the Waikato’s boundary with Auckland.
The region also has a number of natural constraints to its urban form and to land use in general.
For example, flood hazards, peat soils and erosion.
3.5 Our Cultural Heritage
Cultural heritage includes historic sites, structures, places and areas, archaeological sites, and
sites of significance to Māori, including wāhi tapu, and associated surroundings. The Waikato
has a rich cultural heritage and has many historic places and sites. The Waikato is strong in
Maori history and is the home of the Maori King movement or Kingitanga based at
Turangawaewae Marae in Ngaruawahia.
Since the early 1990’s, the settlement of significant Treaty of Waitangi claims has changed both
the cultural and environmental landscape within the Waikato region. For example, the Waikato
Raupatu Claims Settlement Act 1995 saw Crown land returned to Waikato-Tainui, a formal
apology from the Crown and a financial compensation of $170m This settlement has enabled
Waikato-Tainui to grow a significant economic base for the tribe.11
Co-management has ushered in a new way of working with Māori in the realm of environmental
management. Within the Waikato region, there have been a number of co-management
arrangements between the Crown and Māori, which has seen iwi taking an active role in
environmental management and decision-making. This process has provided for a range of
opportunities, particularly for local government, to increase their understanding of Te Ao Māori
and incorporate Māori tikanga and knowledge into council plans and business practices.
10
The Future Proof sub-region refers to Hamilton City, Waikato District and Waipa District 11
Tainui Group Holdings Annual Reports - http://www.tgh.co.nz/default.asp?sid=11&cid=13&aid=. Accessed 24 September 2013.
15
Figure 2: Lifestyle and Rural-Residential Subdivision Activity in the Waikato Region 2009-2013
16
4. Forecasted Regional Demographic Changes
The key highlights from forecasted regional demographic change are set out below.12
Ageing-driven growth: Except for a handful of TAs (only Hamilton City in the Waikato), all
foreseeable growth in New Zealand's TA's will be at 65+ years, and most will see decline at most
other ages. Ageing-driven growth will significantly alter local demand and consumption patterns,
affecting the provision and location of services (particularly schools, supermarkets, health,
leisure, and transport).
Transiting the cusp from growth to decline and rural-urban drift: The sub-national end of
growth/onset of absolute decline now affecting 36 per cent of NZ TA’s will become increasingly
intractable as structural ageing progresses and natural increase diminishes. By contrast,
international migration and urbanisation will slow ageing and continue to grow major urban
areas. The trends mean that Hamilton City will increase its share of the region’s population from
36 per cent in 2011 to around 40 per cent in 2031. Waikato District will also increase its share,
from 16 to 17 per cent, while all other Waikato TA’s are projected to experience relative decline,
and four, absolute decline. Housing prices in declining TA’s are likely to be negatively affected.
The population of Hamilton City will age—albeit more slowly than elsewhere, with the more
youthful Maori, Pacific Island and Asian populations becoming more visible. The European
population will remain the city’s single-largest ethnic group but will decrease its share from 65
per cent in 2011 to around 59 per cent in 2021. Maori will increase their share from 19 to 20 per
cent, and Pacific Island, from 5 to 6 per cent. The greatest growth will be for those of Asian
origin, increasing from 12 to 15 per cent. By 2021 the city’s Asian population will be almost
three-quarters the size of the Maori population, up from two-thirds in 2011, and almost three
times as large as the Pacific Island population, similar to today. Similar shifts will be notable for
all age groups, with Maori, Pacific Island and Asian children increasing their collective share from
45 to 52 per cent.
The low fertility/smaller family sizes, increasing longevity, and mobility driving these trends will
alter housing demand/type. Smaller family sizes will not necessarily correlate with smaller house
sizes, because fertility trends are strongly associated with increasing affluence. More people
living longer and more widowed elderly will be associated with diminishing average household
size and increasing demand for smaller units and/or retirement villages. Student migration (both
international and internal) is likely to sustain demand for student accommodation in Hamilton
City, but this demand may not grow appreciably because it will only offset diminishing domestic
student numbers (but see also points 5 & 6).
Population waves and troughs passing through the educational system will cause oscillating
demand and supply, not only for education but also related services. Over the next 5 years, the
number of Waikato school leavers (15-19 years) will decline by around 1,800, and between 2016
and 2021 by a further 1,600 (nationally by 28,000); between 2021 and 2026 numbers will
increase by approximately the same margin, as the recently born baby blip arrives at those ages.
Numbers are then again projected to decline. By then over half of the baby boomer
teacher/lecturer cohort will have either retired or reduced their participation levels, driving
oscillating demand for education staff. It will be necessary to keep a careful planning eye on this
moving horizon.
How ‘tight’ will the New Zealand (and Waikato) labour market get? Every year for the next 15
years a successively larger cohort will retire (or reduce its participation) and will be 'replaced' by
12
Extracted from ‘What is on a [local] demographer’s mind’, Natalie Jackson, NIDEA, University of Waikato, 2013
17
a successively smaller cohort at labour market entry age, driving an increase in competition for
labour and presumably labour costs. This shift is likely to be felt across most industries,
particularly those that already have relatively ‘old’ age structures (like teaching, nursing, health
care). Hamilton City’s relative youth may not resolve this problem, as a disproportion is engaged
in post-school education. There will be labour market advantages for the relatively youthful
Maori and Pacific Island populations as disproportions of the older European population retire.
Figure 3 below indicates the falling entry: exit ratio for the region and for New Zealand.
Will the region’s elderly ‘age in place’? Hamilton City is presently home to the region’s single-
largest share of 65+ year olds (28 per cent), Waipa second-largest (13.3 per cent), and Waikato
third (12.6 per cent). These shares are projected to increase to 29.1, 13.6 and 15.4 per cent
respectively by 2031, seeing Waikato District shift from third to second position. The shares held
by all other Waikato TA’s are projected to decline, suggesting age-related movement toward
services.
Figure 3: Labour Market Entry / Exit Ratio at 15-24 and 55-64 Years, Waikato Region and Total New
Zealand, 1996-2012
The potential policy implications of these forecasted demographic changes are:
� Altered local demand and consumption patterns affecting the provision and location of
services (eg schools, supermarkets, health care, leisure and transport). � Concentration of people and services in Hamilton City while a number of other Waikato
local authority areas experience a decline. � Effects on house prices and housing demand / type. � Increasing competion for labour because of larger cohort retiring and smaller cohort at
labour market entry age. � Age-related movement towards services – this effects where the 65+ age group are
likely to live and what services will be required. � Affordability of services and ability to pay.
Figure 4 below illustrates the projected population change for the urban areas of the Waikato
region from 2013 to 2031.
18
Figure 4: Projected Change in Urban Waikato Population 2013-2031
19
5. Critical Infrastructure that Supports our Communities
As part of the Waikato Spatial Plan project a Waikato Infrastructure Inventory has been
completed. The report provides an overview of infrastructure networks in the region and
examines the contribution that infrastructure makes to community well-being. The key findings
of the report are summarised below.
General
The large number of organisations that are involved within the Waikato region indicates the
need to enhance relationships within and across infrastructure sectors. This is already
happening through a number of channels; however there is often a lack of consideration of how
individual projects contribute to the wider infrastructure network.
There is a need to have one comprehensive regional ‘infrastructure picture’ that clearly
identifies critical infrastructure networks as well as planned and committed investment that can
be used to enable joined-up decision-making on the priorities for future investment.
Figure 5 indicates the locations of major infrastructure both in and around the Waikato region.
Inter-regional
As well as containing nationally and regionally critical infrastructure, the Waikato Region also
acts as an important infrastructure corridor for electricity and gas, water, waste and key
strategic transport corridors.
There are a number of collaborative processes already underway within the region to address
cross-boundary matters which can be utilised to address infrastructure issues moving forward.
Funding
Local Government expenditure represents approximately 4% of total GDP while central
government expenditure represents approximately 36%.
Local Government operates under approximately 640 planning documents making aligned
planning and decision making around investment difficult.
It is difficult to get comparable data on infrastructure expenditure at a local or regional level due
to different planning and reporting methods used by councils and other providers. There is
scope to align these processes to gain better information.
Regulatory Environment
The regulatory environment does not support long term infrastructure development and
contributes to unnecessary costs and uncertainty.
More consistent district plan provisions for infrastructure would help providers when they are
seeking consents for work across the Region.
Transport
20
The Waikato has a well-established and extensive transport network that supports the
movement of freight and people by a range of modes. The strengths of the three economies of
Auckland, Waikato and the Bay of Plenty make the Upper North Island a strategically important
place for investment in transport infrastructure.
Transport infrastructure in the Waikato region includes:
� A comprehensive road network (including state highways managed by the NZ Transport
Agency and local roads managed by city and district councils)
� Two main railway lines (including part of the North Island Main Trunk and the East Coast
Main Trunk) along with several shorter branch lines owned and operated by KiwiRail
Group
� A public transport network throughout the region and a transport hub managed by the
Waikato Regional Council
� A network of local pedestrian and cycleways developed and managed by local
authorities.
In addition, the region contains the Hamilton International Airport, a regional airport in Taupo,
and the Crawford Street inland port facility in Hamilton.
Currently between 17% and 23% of the national market share of freight is carried by rail in and
through the region.13 The key rail traffic between Auckland-Hamilton-Tauranga is containerised
export and bulk products.
The road network (especially the state highways) is of national importance and provides
connections through (and to) the Waikato. It connects major urban centres, and carries freight
between Regions, and between key locations such as the Port of Auckland and the Port of
Tauranga.
The Waikato region, due to its central/upper North Island position contains many nationally and
inter-regionally strategic road and rail corridors. It also has an important inland port facility
(Crawford St) and has key linkages to the Port of Tauranga and the Ports of Auckland. This
presents the region with significant opportunities in transport and freight movement.
There are also opportunities to facilitate regional economic growth by utilising land around the
Hamilton Airport, progressing the development of the Ruakura Inland Port and increasing use of
rail in the Region.
There is currently limited integration between land use and transport infrastructure in the
region which results in a greater potential for land use change to reduce the efficiency of
transport investment.
Costs of maintenance and operations are significant and there is an affordability issue for some
local councils. Groups such as the Road Maintenance Task Force are identifying potential
collaborative action that can be taken to address this.
The Waikato Expressway is due to be completed in 2019 and will significantly shorten the
journey time between Auckland and Hamilton (and all locations to the south and west). This will
have an impact on travel time savings for freight operators and other road users.
13
Progress toward achievement of Environment Waikato’s RPS objectives: Energy and structures
(infrastructure) (2009, p. 35).
21
The introduction of ‘50Max’ or High Productivity Motor Vehicles across certain parts of the road
network will provide opportunities for freight operators to be more efficient; however it may
result in changes to maintenance costs for the NZTA and local councils.
Water
There is considerable potential in the region for cost savings and efficiencies through a
coordinated approach to water management.
Water infrastructure relating to water supply, wastewater and stormwater are owned and
operated by local government with limited cross-boundary management or consideration.
Water supply is likely to be one of the biggest issues facing the region with Watercare requiring
increased water take from the Waikato River to service population growth in Auckland. For this
reason it is imperative that current and future potable water needs are considered in a
collaborative manner.
The main driver of cost for expenditure by local government is to improve water treatment
infrastructure to meet higher drinking water standards under the Health (Drinking Water)
Amendment Act 2007.
There are potential issues related to aging water infrastructure and the need for better
maintenance and renewal programmes.
Energy
The Waikato region is a nationally significant region for energy generation and for the range of
energy-related resources within it. The region has almost 40% of installed generation capacity,
generating up to 50% of New Zealand’s electricity. In addition to generating a large amount of
New Zealand’s energy, the Waikato is also an important corridor for many transmission
lines/pipes, especially servicing the growing population of Auckland.
Telecommunications
There is a significant gap between broadband availability, service, speed and quality in urban
and rural areas within the Waikato. The government is currently implementing the Ultra-Fast
Broadband initiative and Rural Broadband Initiative (RBI) aimed at increasing broadband service
to parts of the population living in areas that currently have poor service. Unfortunately this will
not cover the entire region. There is limited regional data available for telecommunications
infrastructure and planning.
Social
Central government plays a large part in the provision of social infrastructure (especially in
education, health, courts and prisons) with varying levels of investment between local councils
in the region.
Waste is an important area of focus for the Waikato with large waste flow into, and out of the
region. Waikato landfills take 36% of the North Island’s waste (28% of the nation’s total waste).
Affordable and social housing are issues for the Waikato Region, predominantly addressed by
community agencies and central government.
22
The aging population and rural depopulation will have an impact on the types and locations of
social infrastructure that will be required into the future.
Cultural and Community
Cultural and community infrastructure is provided by numerous agencies, the private sector,
and both local and central government. The range of cultural and community infrastructure and
the amount spent by individual councils varies greatly across the region.
These types of infrastructure are critical when viewed from a network perspective, but may be
best managed at a local level due to the varying needs of individual communities. There may be
little benefit in collaborating regionally on things such as local swimming pools, community halls
and local parks. However, from a network perspective there are opportunities to provide for
community infrastructure on a wider basis through the forthcoming Waikato Sport and
Recreation Plan.
23
Figure 5: Major Transport Infrastructure and Power Stations in and around the Waikato Region
24
6. Spatial Planning
Section 2.3 of this report has outlined what spatial planning is, how it can be used in the
Waikato and what the potential benefits are.
We are operating in a context where there is a strong focus on efficiency and effectiveness;
enhancing economic development and providing value for money. There is a need to provide a
mechanism within which efficiency and effective collaboration on priority issues and responses
across the Waikato can be achieved – that mechanism is the Waikato Spatial Plan.
The primary national and regional drivers for engaging in spatial planning are:
� The Waikato is located in the Upper North Island Growth Triangle where over 50% of future
economic and population growth is forecasted to occur. This will have significant
implications for investment in critical infrastructure, and it is vital that we are united on
what that investment should achieve.
� The Government is the single largest investment partner involved in delivering our
community outcomes, where for every $1 local government invests in the Waikato Region,
central government invests $9. Our combined investment in 20011/12 was $8 billion. It is
vital that we collectively engage with central government on the high priority issues that
face our communities and ensure this investment addresses high priority national and
regional issues.
� The infrastructure efficiency task force report (March 2013) identified that:
…rationalisation and better alignment of legislative and regulatory frameworks would
substantially improve infrastructure delivery, especially if duplication of effort and
conflicting timeframes are addressed. A clear whole-of-government approach is required to
recognise and deal with the issues. Specific recommendations are made about ways to
improve individual aspects of the frameworks. The most significant is that spatial planning
(similar to the Auckland model) should be mandated for use elsewhere in New Zealand.
� The Government has signalled that it wishes to reduce regulatory clutter and reduce the
cost of doing business. The Improving our Resource Management System discussion
document notes the intention that all councils would have a single plan in place within five
years (per district or a broader area if agreed by the councils in that area) unless otherwise
agreed, given variation in current planning review cycles. The Waikato Region presently has
over 640 strategies, policies, plans and bylaws that influence land use or infrastructure
investment, and there is room for rationalisation and simplification of the planning and
regulatory framework.
� Coordinating the disparate planning instruments that are in use across the Region and
achieving better alignment between the documents. This will result in a more equitable
distribution of resources between all four well-beings and provide a mechanism through
which to focus the Crown’s investment in the Region.
� Auckland Council speaks with one voice to Central Government on matters of regional
significance. In July 2010, the Government announced a $10 billion transport package for
Auckland in response to the Auckland Plan. The Waikato is connected to Auckland in a
number of ways, but lacks a similar collective voice. Where the Waikato has previously
spoken with one voice we have achieved good results – e.g. the Government’s investment
in the Waikato Expressway as a Road of National Significance.
� Better engagement with Central Government on key issues, for example promoting
economic development and addressing the economic and social impacts of rural service
decline
� The Local Government Act 2002 Amendment Bill introduced into the House in November
2012 requires local authorities to actively seek to collaborate and cooperate with other
25
local authorities and bodies to improve effectiveness and efficiency, and prepare a 30-year
infrastructure plan.
� The Bay of Plenty Region has commenced a spatial plan. A coordinated spatial planning
framework in Auckland, Waikato and Bay of Plenty will unite the Upper North Island.
� Provides an opportunity to consider and build on the Waikato’s role within New Zealand.
� Providing a strong, collective voice in relation to the Upper North Island transport work
currently being developed and implemented by the NZTA (eg the Upper North Island
Freight Study) in terms of future transport priorities post the Waikato Expressway.
� The Waikato Regional Sport Facilities Plan being developed by Sport Waikato in
collaboration with local authorities is a national first with substantial funding being
committed by Sport New Zealand. Key regional sport funders and high priority sporting
codes are holding off future investment to ensure it aligns with the outcomes of any Spatial
Plan. There will be opportunities for shared funding and delivery of sport and recreation
through this plan, and all local authorities should be at the forefront of these conversations.
� Central Government has started to openly publicise the potential implications of ageing
populations, particularly in rural and coastal NZ, which is also highlighted as a common
issue amongst all local authorities for the Waikato in forecasted demographic data. A
Spatial Plan represents an opportunity to develop policy and service responses.
� The Minister of Local Government proactively released cabinet papers in July 2013 which
indicate a future Local Government Amendment Bill will seek to improve collaboration
between local authorities, acknowledging that it is desirable to have alternative ways for
local authorities to achieve the benefits of larger scale operations / jurisdictions without
reorganisation. The first stage of the Waikato Spatial Plan project will help the Waikato to
identify the specific community issues were greater collaboration may assist at a larger
scale.
A spatial plan will set the strategic direction for the Waikato and its communities which will
integrate economic, social, cultural and environmental well-beings.
Spatial planning will be an important part of the regional toolkit and will have an influence on a
number of key documents. It will also in turn be influenced by existing strategies which set
agreed strategic directions. Figure 6 below illustrates how the Waikato Spatial Plan will interact
with other key documents.
26
Figure 6: Waikato Spatial Plan – Relationship with other Documents
National Direction
(Government’s Priorities, NPS, GPS, NLTP)
RPS
District Plans
LTPs RTP
RMA
Waikato Spatial Plan
Regional
Plans
LTMA LGA
Local
Transport
Strategies
Sub-regional and Local Growth Management Strategies /
Spatial Plans
(Future Proof, TD2050, Coromandel Peninsula Blueprint)
27
7. Findings of Well-Being Evidence Base
This section provides the high level findings from the technical evidence base14, including:
� Economic wellbeing
� Social wellbeing
� Cultural wellbeing
� Environmental wellbeing
� Infrastructure inventory
A list of the technical reports summarised and
relied on in this document are set out in Appendix
2.
It is important to recognise there are significant
linkages between each of the well-beings, as
illustrated in Figure 7. The elements being
considered in each well-being are set out in the supporting table below.
14
The data sets available to the project team vary greatly, and many of the measures of wellbeing are qualitative
rather than quantitative (e.g. perceptions of safety, values, and identity). In these circumstances, the project team
have drawn from documentation that is available. Refer to the full technical reports for further information. This
report is a summary only.
Figure 7: Well-being Linkages
28
7.1 Economic Well-Being
Economic well-being can be broadly interpreted to mean “access to economic resources needed
for a decent standard of living”. It refers to the ability to consume goods and services, the
accumulation of assets and wealth, issues relating to the distribution of income (particularly the
incidence of poverty) and economic security (e.g., security from job loss, illness etc).
The Waikato region’s indicators of economic prosperity show mixed performance and the
region’s economic story has been described as one of unrealised potential. Māori economic
participation and investment in particular offers significant potential for the Waikato region. The
region makes a sizeable contribution to the national economy and in several ways its
performance has remained fairly consistent with the country as a whole. The region has
however been lower than national levels by some measures and there is variation in indicators
between territorial authorities in the Waikato region.
Hamilton city makes the most significant contribution to the region’s gross domestic product
(GDP), at an estimated 45 per cent and its estimated GDP per capita in 2012 was both the
highest in the region and higher than the national average. It is the region’s “central business
district” with concentrations of employment, research, tertiary education and manufacturing.
Hamilton’s industry strengths are inextricably linked to the primary production of the
surrounding region.
The Waikato region has a significant proportion of New Zealand’s export-facing industries but
further value could be extracted by adding value through manufacturing and provision of
services. It is also the second-most diverse economy in New Zealand in terms of having
economic activity spread across many industries. Although key sectors are concentrated in
certain areas, broader value chains operate across the region and there are strong linkages
between urban and rural parts of the region.
The region’s competitive advantage is not well known, agreed or consistently articulated. The
Waikato region is well known as a centre for dairy and beef, but is less well for other key sectors
such as advanced manufacturing and services. Similarly, while local businesses and residents on
the whole have a positive image of the region, it has not yet been able to project this nationally
and internationally.
There is a large number of planning and regulatory documents produced under legislation by
local authorities in the Waikato region currently. The proportion of Resource Management Act
1991 consents processed on time varies across the region and there is a spread of councils
performing better or worse than the national average in this regard. In common with the
country as a whole, regulation is perceived as a common issue or barrier for many businesses in
the Waikato region. Policy and regulatory coordination, as well as pooling of capability and
resources are seen by businesses as opportunities across all the Waikato councils. Progress on
this is being made by the Waikato local authorities.
The region’s range of natural assets makes it attractive for domestic visitors, businesses and
current and potential residents. On the other hand, the Waikato region’s economy is closely tied
to its environment. Key issues include water quantity and quality and soil resources, including
soil quality. Any industry growth must consider these environmental impacts and constraints
and growth in existing primary industries needs to come from increasing the value of processed
products (manufacturing) and services. Innovation in sustainability could be an opportunity.
29
The region is a nationally significant juncture for freight and transport, and has good
connections to large and growing populations in Auckland and Tauranga. Waikato has the
highest per capita central government capital investment in transport and communications, a
good quality road transport network, two of the busiest rail lines in New Zealand, Hamilton
airport and many smaller airports in the region and the fourth largest public transport service in
New Zealand. Most commuter journeys are local in scale and the number of labour market areas
in the Waikato region declined markedly from 1991 to 2006. While data about broadband
uptake by businesses is unavailable, household broadband uptake in the region is relatively low
compared to the national average, although the region outperforms many others and ultra-fast
broadband roll-out should help to improve uptake. Not all areas within the region are covered
by the Ultra-Fast Broadband initiative and Rural Broadband Initiative, which could limit the
potential benefits of better connectivity.
The key economic well-being strengths, challenges and opportunities that have emerged are as
follows:
Waikato Economic Wellbeing
Strengths Challenges
� Sizable contribution to national economy
� Important industry sectors (dairy, meat &
horticulture, forestry and wood products,
high value manufacturing and services)
� Relatively high industrial diversity
� Significant economic benefits from natural
resources
� Range of organisations and infrastructure
that support innovation
� Good quality road and rail transport
network
� Nationally significant transport juncture for
road and rail, and has good connections to
large and growing populations in Auckland
and Tauranga.
� Economic inequalities across the region
� Encouraging greater innovation and value-
added in key industries.
� Difficulty projecting positive image
nationally and internationally
� Managing water and soil demands and the
environmental impacts of natural resource
use
� Not a large base of science and technology
professionals or employment in knowledge
intensive industries
� Relatively weak performance on measures
of visitor attraction, which is also
important for attracting and retaining skills
and business
� A range of skills constraints
� Councils not perceived as business-friendly
and common concerns about the costs
associated with consents and complying
with regulations
Opportunities for the Waikato Spatial Plan
� Reduce inequalities and raise living standards for everyone in the region
� Encourage youth employment
� Potential to leverage Maori development
� Better linkages between and within research and industry
� Encouraging greater value added from our natural resource-based and related industries
� Coromandel aquaculture
� Telling the Waikato Story (articulating the Waikato region’s value proposition as a place to
live, work, study, invest and visit)
� Coordination of skills initiatives
� Improve linkages between research and education organisations and industry.
� Business-friendly councils.
� Inter-regional collaboration.
� The “greening” of growth, including innovation in sustainability.
30
7.2 Social Well-Being15
Social wellbeing refers to aspects of people’s lives that are important or necessary for a person’s
happiness, quality of life, and welfare. It is widely understood that the social wellbeing of people
and communities is vital for a sustainable and productive society and is necessary for building
social capital.
The Waikato is a diverse region with one of New Zealand’s fastest growing urban areas and a
blend of coastal and farming communities. This geographic diversity is a contributing factor for
the needs of people being varied. A key finding of the social well-being report is that the
Waikato Region shares some similar strengths and issues; however the causes of the issues
differ at the local council level, and often within the local council area. This finding will be of
particular significance as the Waikato Spatial Plan project progresses and when discussions start
occurring on what services might be shared across the Waikato Region.
The key social well-being strengths, challenges and opportunities that have emerged are as
follows:
Waikato Social Wellbeing
Strengths Challenges
� Crime stats for 2012 are lower than 2011
� Waikato regional communities have an
increasing life expectancy
� Growing early childhood education rates
� The proportion of school leavers in the
Waikato region with no formal qualification
has fallen dramatically over the past few
years
� Issues affecting youth (eg employment,
education, health, housing, youth
offending and victimisation)
� Housing (quality, fit for need, availability,
costs)
� (Un)employment (including people without
employment and people unsatisfied by
their employment)
� Poverty (relative and absolute)16
� Disproportionate numbers of Maori and
Pasifika in statistics for low education
achievement, poor health, unemployment,
poverty and crime (as both victims and
offenders)
Opportunities for the Waikato Spatial Plan
� Strengthening and increasing the collaboration on social wellbeing between central
government, NGO’s, and local government agencies in the Waikato
� More sharing of information and experience across TA’s to identify similar work-streams for
collaboration
PLEASE NOTE: These two opportunities are already happening and a Waikato Spatial Plan
could provide more opportunities for greater collaboration on shared priority issues, eg
Utilising a shared understanding of the issues for the region and applying a preventative
15
Key messages on Social Well-Being Data: Currently there are a number of limitations to reporting the available data,
including: 1. Census data is unavailable until December 2013 and then analysis could take some time. 2. A lot of the
Waikato’s social wellbeing information is often at the micro level and context specific. 3. In order to confidently
identify any strengths and challenges for the social wellbeing of the Waikato Region there had to be a frequent
reoccurrence of the strength or challenge in most or all TA specific documents 4. There are a number of documents
that assess the social wellbeing of the Region, these are mostly issue based documents, which are useful when
exploring the challenges of the Waikato. 16
Relative poverty is economic inequality in the society one lives in. Absolute poverty is deprivation of basic human
needs.
31
approach, possible reduction in duplicating efforts from councils working toward the same
goal
7.3 Cultural Well-Being17
Cultural wellbeing can be defined as: “… the vitality that
communities and individuals enjoy through participation in
recreation, creative and cultural activities and the freedom to
retain, interpret and express their arts, history, heritage and
traditions.”18
The key issue for the Waikato Spatial Plan is how to, to
continue, to build our ‘Waikato’ identity by:
� Defining a greater point of difference through:
- our place
- our people
- our land
- our towns
� Defining more succinctly, how we talk about the past
� Defining with more regional co-ordination, our creativity
� Defining more clearly, what we enjoy and why
� Defining how we like to celebrate, and then consider:
� How to accurately value and maximise those Waikato cultural strengths?
� How to support the growth of our Waikato cultural diversity?
� How to capture the ‘Waikato stories’ to extend our knowledge on our values, beliefs and
identities in action?
� How to make a greater investment in heritage, arts, sport and leisure in our region?
� How to engage youth to step up into community roles and participate?
� Is there a better way to co-ordinate local resources to benefit a wider community?
The value of having a strong regional identity and pride is a key component for the Waikato
Spatial Plan and adds considerable value to social, economic and environmental wellbeing.
The key cultural well-being strengths, challenges and opportunities that have emerged are as
follows:
Waikato Cultural Wellbeing
Strengths Challenges
� Waikato’s central location and strong
natural amenities valued by its residents
� Diversity of cultures and age groupings
� A range of national, regional and local
opportunities for leisure, sport and art
facilities, including centres of excellence
� Capturing the ‘Waikato stories’ to extend
our knowledge on our values, beliefs and
identities
� Supporting the growth of Waikato cultural
diversity
� Increasing the national and international
17
Key messages on Cultural Well-being data: The data sets specifically measuring cultural wellbeing are not as well
developed as those for the other well-beings. Many of the features of cultural wellbeing such as celebration of
diversity and regional pride are more qualitative and often vary significantly across the region at a local town or
district level, and many local authorities promote local identity in the way they interact with their communities. The
quantitative data sources we have access to draw heavily from assessments available at a national, regional and
district level, however it is held across a number of central government and local government organisations with
often limited consistency and connection between the data sets. 18
Ministry of Culture & Heritage
32
with international recognition
� Unique Maori culture and heritage,
including the Kingitanga movement
� Cultural capital (an asset when measured
against economic, social and environmental
resources) which our region claims as its
‘own’ such as the Waikato only
events/festivals
� Significant natural features, which are
culturally linked to their landscape such as
the Waitomo Caves
leverage from the region’s major events
� Accurately valuing and maximising cultural
strengths
� Increasing Waikato residents’ engagement
with arts and culture equal to or above the
national average
� Making greater investment in heritage,
arts, sport and leisure in our region
� Engaging youth to step up into community
roles and participate
Opportunities for the Waikato Spatial Plan
� More value could be generated from the Waikato base of destination assets
� Having a clear, articulated and agreed value proposition for the region
� Better coordination of the regional marketing promotion
� Enhancing access to, and participation, in cultural activities
� Increasing recognition of the benefits of cultural investments through expansion of our,
‘cultural capital’
� Increasing the protection of our historic heritage
� Identify the ‘Waikato-ness’ of our pride and identity – locally and regionally
� Raise the profile of that Waikato identity and pride
� Strengthening and fostering communities’ diversity- locally and regionally
� Greater coordination of our arts and creativity activities
� Greater coordination of our sport and leisure facilities and events
� Increased emphasis on the value, protection and education of our Maori heritage
� Maintaining our exiting cultural facilities to a high standard
7.4 Environmental Well-Being
Environmental wellbeing is the capacity and ability of the natural environment to support,
sustain and be resilient to the activities of people and communities. It includes the ability for the
environment to adapt and change to human activities where necessary.
Through the use of natural and physical resources we provide for the necessities of life as well as
the comforts and pleasures that come with prosperity. In order to remain prosperous and
healthy we need continued access to a healthy environment. We need to ensure that
ecosystems can continue to provide us with the services that we rely on, such as healthy soils to
grow food, clean water for drinking and to service our farms and industries, wetlands to provide
flood protection and water purification, clean air to breathe and so on.
Often referred to as natural capital, the environment functions and interacts with human
systems, social systems and the built environment. Environmental wellbeing is incorporated
with all aspects of our wellbeing because it responds to our continual interaction with our
physical surroundings.
The key environmental well-being strengths, challenges and opportunities that have emerged
are as follows:
Waikato Environmental Wellbeing
Strengths Challenges
� Good quality soils including a high
percentage of the nation’s high class soils
� Degraded water quality due to land
activities, including effects of
33
� In national and global terms, a good and
steady supply of freshwater
� Significant renewable energy resources
� Mild year-round climate
� An extensive and varied coastal
environment
� A region where the economic benefits of
good environmental outcomes are
valued eg clean air
sedimentation and nutrients in estuaries
and harbours
� Decline in the health and extent of
biodiversity
� Increasing and competing demand for
fresh water – resource is nearing full
allocation (see Figure 8 below)
� Contamination and loss of soil through
intensive and inappropriate land use
� Effects of climate change impacting ability
to provide for our wellbeing
� Incomplete information on some resources
(eg coastal and marine environment and
natural hazards)
Opportunities for the Waikato Spatial Plan
� Improving collaboration amongst agencies to improve our knowledge of resources
including the coastal and marine areas, natural hazards and biodiversity
� Ensuring that economic growth is joined up with the environmental limits of the regions
natural resources and considered in conjunction with our desired objectives for the regions
natural resources.
� Taking an ecosystem services approach19 to describing the impact that our activities are
having on our resources. This may aid in the making of decisions that affect both our
economy and our environment.
� Provide for consideration of the cumulative effects of land use decisions on natural
resources.
� Maintaining a healthy environment for natural resources as a key asset for future economic
growth.
19
Ecosystem services are the natural ‘goods and services’ that the natural economy provides, eg nutrient cycling, water regulation and supply, food production, raw materials and waste treatment
34
Figure 8: Water Allocation Across the Waikato Region
35
7.5 Infrastructure
As part of the evidence base for the Waikato Spatial Plan an Infrastructure Inventory report has
been prepared.
The National Infrastructure Plan prepared by Treasury defines infrastructure as the fixed, long-
lived structures that facilitate the production of goods and services and underpin many aspects
of quality of life.20 Generally, infrastructure refers to physical networks, including transport,
water, energy and telecommunications, however there has been much debate both nationally
and internationally around its definition and complex nature. For the purpose of the Waikato
Spatial Plan, the Treasury NIP definition has been expanded to include hard infrastructure
associated with ‘social, and community and cultural infrastructure’ as they also contribute to
community wellbeing and quality of life.
The Infrastructure Inventory divides infrastructure into six groups, Transport, Energy, Water,
Telecommunications, Social, and Community and Cultural Infrastructure. It is an inventory of
existing regionally critical infrastructure (at a network level), current regional context, and
identification of key opportunities and issues. The
inventory provides context for what is regionally
important for the Waikato. It is important to note that for
the purpose of the Inventory the main focus is on
infrastructure that lies within the regional administrative
boundary – however, infrastructure networks often do
not align with this, rather there are interregional
networks passing through, and infrastructure external to
the region that has significant impacts on the Waikato.
This is also complicated by the different administrative
boundaries that agencies and providers use.
From a regional perspective, infrastructure has different
levels of significance. Some is only important to local
communities, while some will be significant to the entire
region. Regionally critical infrastructure is likely to provide regional benefit, such as a major
road, grid connection or water supply point, as opposed to providing benefits only in the
immediate locality. Some regionally critical infrastructure is also going to be nationally critical.
For example, the regional portion of national networks such as the state highways has an
important national function in the movement of people and goods.
The criteria and methodology to assess critical infrastructure is important, as this will guide what
is considered critical for the Waikato Region. A combination of both quantitative and qualitative
measures have been used to determine “critical infrastructure” for the Waikato Spatial Plan. The
quantitative measures use scope and severity measures which look at the consequences to the
people of the Waikato should the infrastructure fail. The qualitative criteria look at the
contribution the infrastructure makes to the Waikato in terms of the four well-beings.
Attached as Appendix 3 is an assessment of critical infrastructure for each of the six
infrastructure groups. A summary of the critical infrastructure for the Waikato region is below.
Critical Infrastructure
20
National Infrastructure Plan, 2011 at page 1
36
Transport: The Waikato region, due to its central/upper North Island position contains many
nationally and inter-regionally strategic road and rail corridors. State Highway 1 and State
Highway 29 are classified as nationally strategic road corridors whiles the North Island Main
Trunk and East Coast Main Trunk are classified as nationally strategic rail corridors. Hamilton
Airport was identified as having regionally strategic importance, as was the inland port at
Crawford Street.
Energy: All energy infrastructure related to generation, transmission and distribution (including
gas pipelines) meets the criteria for being identified as ‘regionally critical’ when examined from
a network perspective.
Water: All water infrastructure related to water supply and wastewater meet the criteria for
being identified as ‘regionally critical’ when examined from a network perspective, while
stormwater and flood protection infrastructure meet the criteria for being sub-regionally critical.
Water irrigation is identified as locally critical.
Telecommunications: All telecommunications infrastructure meets the criteria for being
identified as ‘regionally critical’ when examined from a network perspective. Internet and
mobile communications facilitate not only economic wellbeing, but contribute highly to social
interactions and wellbeing across the Region. Additionally, all types of telecommunications
infrastructure are identified as nationally critical in national documents. Social Infrastructure: Hospitals, Educations Facilities, Courts and Prisons and Waste Facilities all
meet the threshold for being regionally critical. Emergency Facilities are sub-regionally critical
and social housing is locally critical. Although many social services are identified as critical in
national documents, the infrastructure associated with them is not.
Community and Cultural Infrastructure: Although a number of these networks of facilities meet
the criteria for regionally critical, there is a question as to whether there is benefit in
collaborating on their management and operation at a regional level. Local pools, libraries and
parks are dealt with effectively and efficiently locally, and there is no obvious driver for raising
conversations about these to a regional level.
7.6 High Level Linkages
It is important that linkages are recognised between the four well-beings, as a focus on a single
wellbeing can have flow on positive or negative impacts on other parts of society. The linkages
between the four well-beings can be expressed in a number of ways, including:
� A commonality between two well-beings (e.g. improved employment leads to improved
social wellbeing)
� A constraint / enabler of progress (e.g. sector skills constraining economic growth,
improving air quality enables improved public health)
� A direct trade-off between two outcomes (e.g. water quality decline resulting from
intensified land use)
� A geographic / spatial linkage (e.g. population and economic growth linked to
infrastructure service delivery)
The following are examples of key linkages between the well-beings which have emerged from
the work undertaken to date:
� Growth in economic activity is related to infrastructure and land use pressures. These
affect the Waikato at upper north island, regional and sub-regional scales.
� Reduction in economic activity (population decline, aging population, reduction in
workforce) is resulting in surplus infrastructure / affordability issues for those
communities experiencing decline.
37
� The Waikato economy is built on natural resources which include access to a certain
quality and quantity of water, which in turn is linked to a long term trend of declining
water quality (environmental) and a policy framework to protect and enhance the
Waikato River cultural).
� The Waikato economy is reliant upon a finite set of natural resources (e.g. high quality
soils and minerals), access to which has been compromised in some parts of the region.
� Skills shortages in some economic sectors are not being adequately matched through
education and employment support (social).
� Maori business and leadership is an emerging regional strength directly supporting
improved social and cultural wellbeing.
� Improving the profile and identity of the Waikato Region would assist both improved
economic and cultural wellbeing.
� Youth, unemployment and poverty are linked to economic, social and cultural wellbeing
� Community / social impact arising from rural depopulation and consequential decline in
services
38
8. Methodology to Categorise Regional Strengths, Challenges and
Opportunities
8.1 Criteria
The Waikato region is diverse, with different issues, conditions and interests across the region.
Consequently, opportunities for strategic local government collaboration exist on three different
levels; the macro or national level, regional level, and sub-regional level. Local issues can be
dealt with by individual Councils and aren’t considered as part of the regional spatial planning
framework.
The technical reports summarised in section 7 have identified key strengths, challenges and
opportunities for the Waikato region. A methodology has been developed in order to identify
what matters are nationally, regionally or sub-regionally significant. This will help the Spatial
Plan to identify priority areas for local government to collaborate on. The methodology used to
identify which strengths, challenges and opportunities are nationally, regionally and sub-
regionally important is outlined below:
Nationally Significant
Regionally Significant
Sub-Regionally
Significant
Economic, Social, Cultural and Environmental Well-Being
Strengths, Challenges, Opportunities
� Contributes to Government’s priorities
� Evidence that the issue is of a national scale
� Requires national-level decisions to resolve and / or
deliver
� Waikato-wide influence / strategic importance to the
Waikato
� Evidence that the issue is of a regional scale
� Requires regional-level decisions, actions or partnership to
resolve and / or deliver
� Influence beyond TLA boundary
� Evidence that the issue is of a sub-regional scale
� Requires sub-regional-level decisions, actions or
partnership to resolve and / or deliver
39
A detailed analysis along with supporting data of each of the identified strengths, challenges and
opportunities against the methodology outlined in section 8.1 is provided in Appendix 4.
8.2 National, regional and sub-regional strengths, challenges and opportunities
The table below categorises the identified strengths, challenges and opportunities at the macro
/ national; regional; and sub-regional level. This has been completed for economic, social,
cultural and environmental well-being as well as demographics and infrastructure. It is
important to note that this categorisation is not about whether or not one issue is more
important than another. It is about attempting to identify which matters the Waikato needs to
have a single, collective voice on at national level, which matters are more relevant at a regional
level and which are best addressed or have a greater impact at sub-regional level.
There are too many strengths, challenges and opportunities below to be addressed all at once.
Section 10 of this report highlights the key matters and attempts to identify several headline
issues that the Waikato region, through the Spatial Plan, could focus on.
National Regional Sub-Regional
Economic Well-Being
Economic Strengths Sizable contribution to
national economy
Important industry
sectors (dairy, meat &
horticulture, forestry and
wood products, high
value manufacturing and
services)
Good quality road and
rail transport network
Nationally significant
transport juncture for
road and rail, and has
good connections to
large and growing
populations in Auckland
and Tauranga.
Relatively high industrial
diversity
Significant economic
benefits from natural
resources
Range of organisations
and infrastructure that
support innovation
Economic Challenges Skills Constraints
Environmental Limits (eg
water)
Economic inequalities
across the region
Encouraging greater
innovation and value-
added in key industries.
Image and Branding
Perception of business
environment and
support for innovation
Not a large base of
science and technology
professionals or
employment in
knowledge intensive
industries
Relatively weak
performance on
measures of visitor
Councils not perceived
as business-friendly and
common concerns about
the costs associated with
consents and complying
with regulations
40
attraction, which is also
important for attracting
and retaining skills and
business
Economic
Opportunities
Large economy with
strengths in nationally
significant and exporting
industries
Connectivity to the
Upper North Island and
gateway to the south
Leveraging Maori
development
Reduce inequalities and
raise living standards for
everyone in the region
Encourage youth
employment
High quality amenities
and natural assets
Coromandel aquaculture
Encouraging greater
value added from our
natural resource-based
and related industries
Telling the Waikato Story
Coordination of skills
initiatives
The “greening” of
growth, including
innovation in
sustainability.
Inter-regional
collaboration.
Improve linkages
between research and
education organisations
and industry.
Business-friendly
councils.
Social Well-Being
Social Strengths Growing Early Childhood
Education Rates
Increase in School-
Leavers with formal
qualifications
Less Crime
Increased Life
Expectancy
Social Challenges Housing
Unemployment
Poverty
Disproportionate
numbers of Maori and
Pasifika in statistics for
low education
achievement, poor
health, unemployment,
poverty and crime (as
both victims and
offenders)
Issues for Youth (eg
employment, education,
health, housing, youth
offending and
victimisation)
Social Opportunities Strengthening
Collaboration with
Central Government
Reduction in Duplicating
efforts
Information Sharing
Cultural Well-Being
Cultural Strengths Unique Maori Culture Range of opportunities Significant natural
41
and Heritage, eg
Kingitanga movement
Cultural Capital, eg
uniquely Waikato
events/festivals
for Leisure, Sport and Art
facilities (eg centres of
excellence)
Waikato’s central
location and strong
natural amenities valued
by its residents
features that are
culturally linked to their
landscape
Cultural diversity
Cultural Challenges Engaging youth Accurately valuing and
maximising strengths
Capturing ‘Waikato
Stories’
Greater investment in
heritage, arts, sport and
leisure
Leveraging off the
region’s major events
Increasing residents’
engagement with arts
and culture equal to or
above the national
average
Supporting growth of
cultural diversity
Cultural
Opportunities
Increasing recognition of
the benefits of cultural
investments through
expansion of our
‘cultural capital’.
Increased emphasis on
the value, protection and
education of our Maori
heritage
Raising profile of
Waikato identify and
pride
Increasing protection of
historic heritage
Greater value could be
generated from the
Waikato base of
destination assets
Having a clear,
articulated and agreed
value proposition for the
region
Better coordination of
regional marketing
promotion
Enhancing access to and
participation in cultural
activities
Greater coordination of
arts, creativity, sport and
leisure facilities and
events
Maintaining existing
cultural facilities
Strengthening
community and
fostering diversity
Environmental Well-Being
Environmental
Strengths
High percentage of high
class soils
Mild year-round climate
An extensive and varied
coastal environment
42
Good source of
renewables
Steady supply of
freshwater
A region where the
economic benefits of
good environmental
outcomes are valued
Environmental
Challenges
Degraded water quality
Increasing and
competing demand for
fresh water
Contamination and loss
of soil through intensive
and inappropriate land
use
Decline in the health and
extent of biodiversity
Effects of climate –
increasing frequency of
extreme climate events
(droughts / floods)
Incomplete information
on some resources (eg
coastal and marine
environment and
natural hazards)
Environmental
Opportunities
Ensuring that economic
growth is joined up with
environmental limits
Taking an ecosystem
services approach to
describe impact that
activities are having on
our environment.
Provide for consideration
of cumulative effects of
land use decisions on
natural resources.
Maintaining a healthy
environment for natural
resources as a key asset
for future economic
growth.
Collaboration to fill
information gaps
Better integrating land
use and resource use
decisions to ensure the
most efficient and
effective use of our
resources in the long
term.
Demographics
Strengths Waikato region is
relatively youthful
compared to other
regions
Steady regional growth
overall
Net migration for some
areas
Hamilton City growth
Challenges Ageing driven growth
Low fertility / smaller
family sizes
Population waves and
troughs passing through
education and other
services
Tightening of the labour
market
Transiting from growth
to decline
Opportunities Ageing population -
changing the nature of
work and maximising the
potential of older
workers, growing
consumer market for
older people,
opportunities for
community participation
Changing demands for
goods and services
Age-related movement
towards services (ie the
elderly moving to
Hamilton, Waikato and
Waipa districts)
Investing in youth to
ensure they have the
right skills
Increasing cultural
diversity
43
Infrastructure
Strengths Road and rail network is
of national importance
providing connections
through and to the
Waikato
The Waikato Expressway
Energy generation
(Waikato generates 50%
of NZ’s electricity)
Significant corridors for
infrastructure (both
within the region and
into other regions)
Hamilton Airport and
Crawford St Inland Port
Existing collaborative
processes to address
cross-boundary issues
that can be utilised
Major Event facilities
Challenges Competing demands for
funding for
infrastructure projects
and national prioritising
of projects (particularly
transport) results in
some areas missing out
on investment
Restructuring of shipping
destinations
One day needing to find
a suitable replacement
for the power output
from Huntly thermal
Over allocation of water
Funding the ongoing
costs associated with
maintenance and
operation of
infrastructure
Land use changes can
significantly impact
infrastructure,
particularly transport
Reverse sensitivity issues
Large number of district
plans and rules across
the Region make
integrated planning for
infrastructure difficult
Historic underinvestment
Ageing population will
have a significant impact
on the infrastructure
needs of the region
Lack of collaborative and
forward planning for
infrastructure
Variable and sometimes
limited information on
infrastructure asset age
and performance
Significant differences
between Councils on
infrastructure (eg
different priorities,
ability and willingness to
pay)
Lower priority given to
social infrastructure
because of financial
constraints
Social infrastructure
withdrawing from small
or remote towns
Opportunities Alternative approaches
to funding, delivery and
management of assets
(including shared
funding)
Implementing the
KiwiRail Turnaround plan
will improve the
effectiveness of the rail
network.
More coordinated
management of
infrastructure assets
both within councils and
at a regional level
(including shared
services)
Further irrigation
development
New broadband and
Maximising returns on
Waikato Expressway
investment through local
planning for bypassed
communities.
44
Population growth and
changing demands for
energy
Waikato’s position as a
key renewable electricity
generator
mobile coverage in rural
areas expected to enable
a major boost to rural
productivity
Alignment of social
infrastructure planning
between local and
central government, the
private sector and other
agencies
45
9. Outcomes from Council Workshops
In July 2013 a series of workshops were held with the Waikato region’s local authorities. The
purpose of the workshops was to:
� Raise the profile and understanding of the Waikato Spatial Plan project � Explore each council’s adopted community outcomes to identify success, barriers and
challenges in meeting the outcome � To identify priorities that may be needed to better achieve the outcomes in an attempt
to identify priority areas that a Spatial Plan for the Waikato may assist in addressing.
The top three common successes across the region identified by the workshops were:
� The strength of their community partnerships.
� District level economic resilience despite the global financial crisis.
� Efficient and effective provision of critical infrastructure.
The top three common challenges across the region were:
� Affordability of infrastructure
� The effect of regulatory systems and environmental policy on economic growth
� The loss of human capital arising from depopulation and ageing populations
The key priority areas for regional collaboration as identified by the majority of the Councils
were:
� Collaboration to develop a strategic vision, with an agreed action plan to advocate the
vision from - this is particularly important to help the region speak with one voice and
advocate a strong position in reaction to the Waikato Region’s role in sustainably
supporting growth in the upper north island.
� National / regionally consistent approach to legislation and delivery of the four well-
beings.
� Demographic change – how do we plan / respond?
� Develop a regional development strategy to reduce the current level of competition
amongst the districts for economic development, infrastructure and facilities, and
manage growth around the region’s largest city in a collaborative manner.
These challenges and priority areas have also come through in the strengths, challenges and
opportunities identified by the technical reports. A number of these are also identified as key
matters in section 10 below, including ‘headline’ issues.
46
10. Key Regional Strengths, Challenges and Opportunities
10.1 Key Matters for the Waikato Region
The following are the key strengths, challenges and opportunities across the four well-beings as
well as infrastructure and demographics that the Waikato region should be speaking with one
voice on. A key message from Government is that the Waikato Region needs to speak as one
collective voice on matters of strategic importance.
Waikato Strengths
� Sizable contribution to national economy
� Important industry sectors (dairy, meat & horticulture, forestry and wood products, high
value manufacturing and services)
� Road and rail network is of national importance providing connections through and to
the Waikato
� Nationally significant transport juncture for road and rail, and has good connections to
large and growing populations in Auckland and Tauranga.
� Growing Early Childhood Education Rates
� Increase in School-Leavers with formal qualifications
� Unique Maori Culture and Heritage, eg Kingitanga movement
� Cultural Capital, eg uniquely Waikato events/festivals
� High percentage of high class soils
� Good source of renewables
� Steady supply of freshwater
� Waikato region is relatively youthful compared to other regions
� The Waikato Expressway
� Energy generation (Waikato generates 50% of NZ’s electricity)
� Significant corridors for infrastructure (both within the region and into other regions)
Waikato Challenges
� Skills Constraints
� Environmental Limits (eg water)
� Economic inequalities across the region
� Encouraging greater innovation and value-added in key industries.
� Housing
� Unemployment
� Poverty
� Engaging youth
� Disproportionate numbers of Maori and Pasifika in statistics for low education
achievement, poor health, unemployment, poverty and crime (as both victims and
offenders)
� Degraded water quality
� Increasing and competing demand for fresh water / over allocation of water
� Contamination and loss of soil through intensive and inappropriate land use
� Ageing driven growth
� Low fertility / smaller family sizes
� Population waves and troughs passing through education and other services
� Competing demands for funding for infrastructure projects and national prioritising of
projects (particularly transport) results in some areas missing out on investment
47
� Restructuring of shipping destinations
� One day needing to find a suitable replacement for the power output from Huntly
thermal
� Lacking a coordinated planning framework (between central and local government,
between legislation and between regions)
Waikato Opportunities
� Large economy with strengths in nationally significant and exporting industries
� Connectivity to the Upper North Island and gateway to the south
� Leveraging Maori development
� Reduce inequalities and raise living standards for everyone in the region
� Encourage youth employment
� Reduction in duplication
� Strengthening collaboration with Central Government
� Increasing recognition of the benefits of cultural investments through expansion of our
‘cultural capital’
� Increased emphasis on the value, protection and education of our Maori heritage
� Contributing to achieving targets for renewable electricity generation
� Ageing population changing the nature of work
� Changing demands for goods and services
� Alternative approaches to funding, delivery and management of assets (including shared
funding)
� Implementing the KiwiRail Turnaround plan to improve the effectiveness of the rail
network.
� Population growth and changing demands for energy
� Waikato’s position as a key renewable electricity generator
� A connected planning framework through the use of a spatial plan (noting that this
opportunity would be even stronger if the spatial plan had legislative backing)
� Governance arrangements which support a competitive economy
10.2 The Headline Strengths, Challenges and Opportunities
There are a number of strengths, challenges and opportunities identified in section 10.1 above.
While they are all important there are too many for the region to focus on at once. The table
below identifies some ‘headline’ strengths, challenges and opportunities that the region can
focus on now and that can be used as the basis for developing a spatial plan.
The test used to determine what was a ‘headline’ strength, challenge or opportunity is as
follows:
� Significance both nationally and regionally
� Has an impact on other well-beings
� An issue of high importance to the community or of significant potential benefit to the
community
48
Strengths
� Nationally significant transport juncture and connections to
Auckland and Tauranga
� Contribution to national economy through important industry
sectors
� Hamilton as the Waikato centre for innovation, employment and
services
Challenges
� Declining rural populations and associated decline in services
� An ageing population and shrinking skill base
� Water quality and water allocation
� Economic inequalities across the region
Opportunities � Maximising opportunities, including investment, through aligned
planning
� Leveraging Maori development
� Connectivity to the Upper North Island
Before the future emphasis of the headline regional strengths, challenges and opportunities is
finally confirmed, there is a need to undertake as the first stage of the Phase 2 spatial plan
development, a three dimensional layering exercise to better understand how these outcomes
impact on each other from a four well-beings perspective.
49
11. Conclusions and Recommendations
11.1 Conclusions
This report has analysed all of the research documents and their recommendations prepared by
the Technical Leadership Group. For completeness the authors have also drawn on all previous
advice provided to the Mayoral Forum during 2012 and 2013 as well as work on local
government collaboration undertaken by Emerson and Auton in September 2011.
In addition the report identifies the changing operating climate of the local government sector
as documented in the two late 2013 Local Government Commission reorganisation proposals for
Northland and the Hawkes Bay. These reports reference:
� the necessity of areas to be able to speak with one voice on agreed issues to improve
the effectiveness of interaction with Central Government as well as achieving better
public policy outcomes
� the challenges facing the sector especially the financial viability of some councils
� the need to have governance structures which assist effective strategic planning
� the improvements necessary to achieve more cost effective regulation and service
delivery
� the need to address rural decline
� the expectation that re-organised local government will assist the national objective
of improved economic performance.
Without doubt the extensive reforms recently undertaken in Auckland have influenced the
Commissions thinking. In addition studies such as those completed by PWC for the Wellington
Regional Council in 201021 which outlines a hierarchy of interventions for improving local
government performance (see Figure 9), have had an influence.
21
Wellington Region Councils – Governance Review, October 2010, Price Waterhouse Coopers, Diagram in Figure 5 from page 52
Figure 9: Opportunities for Regional Collaboration
50
The Commission’s findings in both Northland and the Hawkes Bay are supported by a significant
amount of high quality analysis and documentation. Clearly, where the Commission feels that
insufficient progress has been made in areas such as shared services, it has recommended
comprehensive reorganisation. This is the approach likely to be taken in other parts of New
Zealand when proposals are received with trigger the reform process.
Given the stage which the Local Government Commission is at with its work, it is important that
we do not try and second guess where things could end up for the Waikato region. The focus
should be on local government function, not on form. We need to work out what we can do and
how we can achieve this. Functions are known, whereas the future form of local government in
the Waikato is not. There is extensive technical data which provides a sound evidence base for
undertaking spatial planning. There now needs to be a debate and discussion on the priority
areas and working together for comment benefit.
The Spatial Plan Process
The research work undertaken to date indicates if a spatial plan is commissioned for the
Waikato Region with a number of specific outcomes clearly defined, the document will provide a
useful tool for performance improvement, speaking with one voice and having a clearly agreed
regional direction.
While the detail of a spatial plan is yet to come it is a process which will provide a framework for
ongoing joined up thinking.
The next step is for the Waikato Mayoral Forum to determine the value of developing a full
Spatial Plan for the Region, using the data contained in the technical reports as a starting point
for a collaborative discussion.
A future step in this process may also be to seek legislative backing for a spatial plan in the
Waikato region.
The Benefits
The potential benefits of progressing Phase 2 of the Spatial Plan are set out below:
� Provides a long-term strategic direction for the region along with certainty.
� Identifies priority issues for speaking with ‘one-voice’ on
� Strategic spatial planning is often considered to be the best way for optimising the use
of current resources, including infrastructure and services, and facilitating a framework
for effective long-term infrastructure planning.
� Spatial planning can help to integrate land use, infrastructure and funding.
� Planning alignment and a consistent approach.
� Encourages the sharing of information.
� Community involvement in setting a strategic direction.
� Addresses cross boundary issues.
� Spatial planning allows a regional discussion about matters that would benefit from a
regional response, such as the impact of the aging population and rural depopulation.
� Can ensure that planning under different Acts is coordinated and integrated.
� Spatial Planning can inform the development of subsequent regional and local
documents as they come up for review, by having one shared document outlining issues
and opportunities at a regional scale, individual agencies can have confidence that they
are basing their own local planning on a shared evidence base.
51
A Spatial Plan represents a significant opportunity for the Waikato region and one which may
not arise again given the current operating climate. Failure to collaborate strategically may
potentially expose the region to a number of risks and costs. The region needs to use the spatial
plan process to set some priorities and progress these through phase 2 of the project.
The Mayoral Forum has received a significant amount of quality information and advice.
However, unless there is commitment to moving forward, particularly in terms of the headline
strengths, challenges and opportunities identified in section 10.2, the benefits of having
completed all of the technical work and the opportunity to align with the Government’s policy
and operational context, will be lost.
11.2 Recommendations
That the Mayoral Forum:
1. Agree that the identified national, regional and sub-regional issues set out in Section 8.2
are the basis for moving to the next phase of this project
2. Agree that the headline strengths, challenges and opportunities outlined in section 10.2
should form the basis for scoping phase 2, noting that a spatial layering exercise will be
undertaken at the outset of this phase.
3. Agree that based on the analysis undertaken and conclusions reached in this report,
Phase 2 of this project to prepare a Waikato Spatial Plan proceed.
4. Agree to prepare a project plan containing scope, timeframes, resources, cost sharing
and possible governance arrangements.
5. Agree to adopt the project plan in conjunction with the partner Councils no later than
April 2014.
52
Appendix 1: Business Case for Waikato Spatial Plan
A Business Case for Completing the Waikato Plan
Background The thinking of the Governance Group has been informed by intra-regional discussions and
inter-regional discussions with Auckland Council and Government’s Auckland Policy Office. The
Governance Group has focused on:
1. Best practise governance frameworks;
2. Developing a collective voice for the Waikato; and
3. Strategic engagement with central government.
A key message from discussions with the Auckland Policy Office was that to secure and influence
future government investment in the Waikato, the Region needs to speak as one collective voice
on matters of strategic importance.
The concept of a Waikato Spatial Plan is woven through all three of these topic areas,
particularly in developing the collective voice for the Waikato on high priority regional and sub-
regional issues that affect the quality of life for people and communities.
The Waikato Mayoral Forum has confirmed that preparatory work commence on completing a
Waikato Spatial Plan (“The Waikato Plan”). The project will be completed in three broad stages:
1. Project establishment, including securing an independent Project Director, developing a
detailed terms of reference, project budget and programme. This stage is being
managed by the Mayoral Forum’s Governance and Planning group.
2. Collating a common evidence base across the 4-wellbeings.
3. Completing the Waikato Plan.
The outline programme for the project would see the Waikato Plan completed in time to inform
the 2015 Long Term Plans and the 2015-25 Waikato Regional Land Transport Plan.
Project Intent The Waikato Plan is intended to be a 30-year economic, environmental, social and cultural
strategy for the management and development of the Waikato region. The primary objective
for the Waikato Plan is:
1. To develop a shared vision and collective voice on the high priority regional and sub-
regional issues that will improve the quality of living for people and communities in the
Waikato over the next 30-years.
Developing and implementing the Waikato Plan will provide an important opportunity to
identify, negotiate and agree on priorities and actions across multiple parties including local and
central government, the private sector and non-government organisations. The process of
developing the Waikato Plan will also:
1. Provide a shared evidence base from which to make investment and policy decisions
that are efficient and effective in a collective way;
2. Help define communities of interest that cross local authority boundaries such as labour
markets, catchment management, co-management and freight and logistics;
53
3. Enable a conversation on enduring governance frameworks required to support the
development and implementation of the Waikato Plan and its vision for the region;
4. Improve the efficiency and effectiveness of local authorities, central government and
communities to address high priority issues; and
5. Help to rationalise the existing planning and service delivery system for people and
communities.
Project Rationale and Benefits A Collective Voice: The value of speaking as one voice on high priority regional and sub-regional
issues has been summarised into the following four themes. The potential benefits of the Plan
are discussed under each of these themes.
Enhanced Coordination of ‘Whole of Government’ Investment
The Auckland Council is now the largest local body in Australasia with total assets exceeding
$34B and an annual operating revenue of approximately $1.3B22. When developing the
Auckland Plan it was found that central Government invested roughly $9 for every $1 invested
by Auckland Council, providing a combined annual investment of approximately $13B. The
Auckland Plan provides the strategic vision around which discussions are had on the
optimisation of this investment into Auckland.
In the 2011/12 financial year, the 11 local authorities in the Waikato Region reported combined
assets of $11B and annual operating revenues of $800M. Assuming the same ratio with
Auckland ($9 : $1), this provides a ‘whole of government’ annual investment of approximately
$8B. Auckland Council found that central Government is the primary investor in local
community outcomes, and it therefore makes sense for local authorities in the Waikato to help
prioritise and guide this investment.
Efficiency savings brought about by acting collectively with central Government on high priority
issues could prove significant. A 0.25% efficiency gain would provide an annual saving of over
$20M for local and central Government.
When the Waikato Region has acted in a collective manner, this has proven to be effective when
seeking additional Government investment. Recent examples include:
1. Collective action by the Waikato Regional Transport Committee secured $215M of
Crown Funding for land transport initiatives, which has been largely invested in the
Waikato Expressway and doubling the capacity of the East Coast Main Trunk Line.
2. Lake Taupo Protection Trust secured a combined fund of $81M to reduce nitrogen
leaching into Lake Taupo over 15 years.
3. The Waikato River Authority administers a combined fund of $220M to restore and
protect the health and wellbeing of the Waikato River.
Identification and advancement of further opportunities will be facilitated by the Waikato Plan.
Improving Coordination of Government, Regional and Local Policy
The Government has set a goal of increasing the ratio of exports to GDP to 40% by 2025. The
Better Natural Resources report (the Report) was launched on 11 Dec 2012 as part of the
Governments Business Growth Agenda and states that:
Meeting the target will require the value of our exports to double in real terms by 2025,
and our primary sector will need to continue to deliver robust export growth at, or near,
its recent rates if we are to achieve the 40% target.
22
Auckland Council Annual Report, 2011
54
The Report states that NZ’s natural resource endowment is critical to our international
economic success and sets out 49 key initiatives including:
• Improving the governance and allocation of freshwater
• Ensuring the regulatory framework supports further investment in appropriate
renewable energy projects by removing unnecessary regulatory barriers
• Streamlining the regional planning process, with a focus on reducing the nation’s 170+
resource management plans, and promoting consistency between plans
• Improve the quality of analysis which Councils use to make decisions
• Growing business opportunities on conservation land
• Engage with local Councils to improve management of biodiversity and ecosystem
services at a catchment level.
• Realising greater value from our marine and aquaculture resources
• Harnessing the productive resources held by Maori
• Incentivise New Zealand business and households to transition to a low emissions
economy while improving productivity.
Many of these initiatives translate into the Waikato, and it is important that the Waikato
responds to these challenges. For example, the Governance and Planning workstreams found
over 640 non-RMA strategies, policies and plans in the Waikato region, and a wide range of
policies and standards within existing District Plans (e.g. over 50 different earthworks
standards).
To respond to the challenges laid out in the Government’s business growth agenda, local
government cannot afford to present an inefficient and fragmented approach to resource
allocation, infrastructure provision or service delivery. The Waikato Plan will assist local
authorities and key stakeholders to identify strategic opportunities, recognise any trade-offs and
make strategic policy decisions on high priority issues.
Enables a joined up debate on local government form
In the face of mounting community and sector group advocacy for changes to local government
structure, there is presently a vacuum of information to inform collective debate. Whilst some
councils are progressing with their own business cases, others have developed and adopted
policies for assessing submissions to the Local Government Commission.
The Waikato Plan can assist by establishing a common evidence base and a collective voice on
an appropriate form of local government for the Waikato Region.
Efficiency savings for NZ Inc. and Waikato Ratepayers
Section 10 of the Local Government Act has recently been amended to focus local authorities on
efficient and effective local infrastructure, local public services, and performance of regulatory
functions in a way that is most cost-effective for households and businesses. There are
potentially significant efficiencies to be achieved through greater collaboration at a regional or
sub-regional level which the Waikato Plan would scope, prioritise and guide.
Examples of potential efficiency gains for Waikato ratepayers are identified overleaf, including
streamlining the existing service delivery systems for RMA planning and infrastructure,
collaboration on service delivery and form of governance for the Waikato. These issues are
already being explored by Central Government (as outlined above), and the Waikato needs to
respond to these challenges in a coordinated way.
Stage two of the Waikato Plan will see the development of a shared evidence base from which
local authorities can draw information for policies, bylaws, and long term plans. There are likely
to be cost savings provided to local authorities, including:
55
a. Working off a common evidence base will limit the potential for debates on accepted
evidence.
b. Common evidence base and policy approach enables a shared approach to policy and
investment priorities (e.g. the current relationship between the RLTS (the policy
document) and the RLTP which prioritises investment).
c. A common data approach is a core outcome being sought in the Roading working
group. It is anticipated that common data will assist with benchmarking road asset
management across the Waikato road network, and optimise the $500M investment
that local authorities and the NZTA are making in road asset management over the
next 3 years.
Stage three will see engagement and prioritisation of high priority regional and sub-regional
issues as part of developing the Waikato Plan.
Conclusion There are a range of monetary and non-monetary benefits to the Waikato which will help
improve the wellbeing of our communities. The Government continues to engage on its
Business Growth Agenda, and is embarking on a wide variety of initiatives that will impact upon
the Waikato communities. Without a collective voice and a united position on these initiatives,
the Waikato is likely to miss many of the opportunities presented by present Government policy.
The Waikato Plan, and supporting strategic approaches such as the Economic Development
Strategy will assist local authorities to position themselves to best effect to engage with, support
and benefit from these initiatives.
56
EXAMINATION OF POTENTIAL COST SAVINGS FOR THE WAIKATO COUNCILS
Legislation Opportunity Evidence of Cost Savings Potential Waikato Outcome
Efficiencies in ‘Whole
of Government’
Investment
The Auckland Spatial Plan found a ratio of Government
to Local Government investment of 9:1. Central
Government is therefore the major player for
delivering local community outcomes, and it makes
sense to collaborate and engage proactively with
central Government partners.
• Waikato Councils hold combined assets of $11B and
annual revenues of $800M.
• Assuming a 9:1 annual investment ratio with Central
Government that amounts to approx. $8B into the
Waikato Region
• Identifying efficiencies of 0.25% of this annual
investment would save over $20M / year.
RMA
Combined RMA Plans
(District Plans) similar
to those achieved in
South Wairarapa
Wairarapa Councils combined district plans achieved:
• 40% cost savings for district plan development
• Supported by key stakeholders as cost savings for
them also across their district plan framework
• Plan development costs advised between $1.2 - $5M
with an average cost of $3.1M
• 40% average cost saving = $1.24M or $12M across the
region, or $63 / rateable property over the plan life.
• Cost savings for submitters likely to be similar across
the region
Combined district plan
administration
processes
Wairarapa Councils achieved:
• Efficiencies in plan administration, legal services and
notification processes equivalent to approximately
15 - 20% of current District plan administration
budgets.
In 2012 Waikato District Council’s resource consent
processing services cost $2.3M. A 15% saving through
efficiencies such as those achieved by Wairarapa would
save $345k per year.
Shared SOE Reporting
• Councils vary widely in what they report and how it
is reported
• Future Proof has taken over a year to agree how to
monitor the strategy and has grappled with data
issues
There is not a clear picture of how much budget is being
allocated by each council to SOE reporting. Savings are
potentially modest, as this type of reporting is not a high
priority.
LGA Shared policies and
approaches
• Auckland Council is aiming to reduce their total
policies from over 900 to approximately 20 with
anticipated savings.
• There are 640 policies, plans and strategies that
have been adopted throughout the Waikato Region,
Assuming policies cost an average $25k each to prepare,
consult and adopt through Council, and the Waikato can
reduce the total number of policies by 10%, would yield a
saving of $1.6M
57
EXAMINATION OF POTENTIAL COST SAVINGS FOR THE WAIKATO COUNCILS
Legislation Opportunity Evidence of Cost Savings Potential Waikato Outcome
the majority of which will be reviewed over the next
3-5 years.
Informing the form of
Local Government in
the Waikato
• Both major parties believe changes in structure are
required
• LG Amendment Act enables changes to be brought
forward to LG Commission
• LG Commission process relies upon evidence from
district / region concerned
• Several proposals across the Waikato for change
• Waikato Regional Council has adopted policies on
how to inform proposals – these are not shared by
all Councils.
There is significant potential for largely uninformed and
polarised views emerging on the form of local
government.
The Local Government Commission would not be well
informed by the Waikato Local Authorities at present.
Other
Functions
Provision of
infrastructure
• The Road Maintenance Task Force report forecasts
2-20% cost saving for road maintenance if road
asset management were altered from its present
form.
Using the RMTF figures this would amount to between $10
and $100M savings over the next 3 years.
58
Appendix 2: List of Technical Reports
Waikato Region - Demographic Profile 1986 – 2031, July 2013, National Institute of Demographic
and Economic Analysis, University of Waikato
Waikato Spatial Plan Project - Economic Wellbeing Report, December 2013, Tariq Ashraf, Waikato
Regional Council
Waikato Spatial Plan Project - Social Wellbeing Report, December 2013, Esmae McKenzie-Norton,
Hamilton City Council
Waikato Spatial Plan - Cultural Wellbeing, December 2013, Jenni Vernon (Waikato District Council),
Amanda Banks (Waikato Regional Council), Donna Tracey (Waikato District Council)
Waikato Spatial Plan - Environmental Wellbeing Working Paper, December 2013, Megan Kettle
(Waikato Regional Council)
Waikato Infrastructure Inventory, December 2013, Hannah Windle, NZTA
Waikato Spatial Plan Toolkit Discussion Document, October 2013
Waikato Regional Economic Profile, October 2012, Waikato Regional Council Technical Report
2012/37
59
Appendix 3: Assessment of Critical Infrastructure for the Waikato
Both quantitative and qualitative measures have been used in determining “Critical Infrastructure”
for the Waikato Spatial Plan.
Quantitative: Scope and severity measures – These criteria look at the consequences to the people
of the Waikato should the infrastructure fail, and can be determined by the extent of the geographic
area and number of people affected by its loss or availability (aligned with the lifelines project). The
thresholds for these measures are outlined below.
Qualitative: Contribution to community wellbeing – This measure looks at the contribution the
infrastructure makes to the Waikato in terms of:
� Economic Wellbeing (including contribution to economic prosperity, land based industries,
regional planning, research and innovation, sustainable development, tourism, transport,
infrastructure and services).
� Environmental Wellbeing (including contribution to, water quality, air quality, protection of
productive soils, energy efficiency or conservation, waste reduction, biodiversity, energy
resources, minerals, coastal and marine environments).
� Social Wellbeing (including contribution to enabling participation in community and public
affairs, community safety , public health, social housing, social support and cohesion,
education).
� Cultural Wellbeing (including contribution to the arts, leisure and recreation, cultural
participation and identity, Maori heritage, heritage values, regional identity and pride).
60
Threshold for ‘Regionally Critical Infrastructure’
After considering the above criteria, a threshold for ‘critical’ can be determined. At this stage, it is
proposed that the threshold sits where an infrastructure network has 2 or more red rankings.
Through the development of Phase 2 of the Waikato Spatial Plan there is scope to test this threshold
and re-evaluate if necessary. Additionally, if an infrastructure network has already been identified at
a national level as critical, then it has been automatically assumed to be regionally critical. An
example of this would be infrastructure associated with electricity transmission. The existence of a
National Policy Statement for Electricity Transmission recognises the national significance of New
Zealand’s national grid.
Nationally critical = Identified as critical in a National Document/Strategy
Regionally critical = 2+ red
Sub-regionally critical = 1 red
Locally critical = no red
Transport
The Waikato region’s strategic (critical) transport corridors and infrastructure, divided into national,
regional and sub-regional importance.
61
62
Energy
Water
63
Telecommunications
Social Infrastructure
64
Community and Cultural Infrastructure
65
Appendix 4: Assessment of Strengths, Challenges and Opportunities Methodology and Analysis for Categorising Regional Strengths, Challenges and Opportunities
The following table sets out the framework for categorising the strengths, challenges and opportunities identified in the technical reports. The following
methodology allows us to clearly identify:
� Macro/National issues - ‘One Voice’ of the Waikato
� Regional issues
� Sub-Regional issues
Each strength, challenge and opportunity under each of the four well-beings has been tested to see whether it fits at national, regional or sub-regional
level. All of the issues outlined are important. The purpose of the analysis is to gain a better understanding of the scale of the issue and what is best dealt
with at national, regional or sub-regional level.
Economic Well-Being
Criteria Economic Strengths Economic Challenges Economic Opportunities
Macro / National23
1. Contribution to
Government’s
Priorities24
2. Evidence that
issue is of a national
scale (eg included in
national documents)
3. Requires national-
level decisions or
action to resolve and
/ or deliver
Sizeable contribution to national economy
and Important industry sectors
1. Falls under the Government’s priority of
building a more competitive and productive
economy. This includes export markets and
innovation. The Waikato region has a
significant proportion of New Zealand’s export-
facing industries. Although key sectors are
concentrated in certain areas, it is also the
second-most diverse economy in New Zealand
in terms of having economic activity spread
Skills Constraints
1. Set in the National Government’s priorities
– “Skilled and Safe Workplaces – We're
helping more Kiwis get the skills they need to
build a successful career, find work in New
Zealand, and earn the higher incomes they
deserve”25
2. Unemployment and skills constraints are
identified as issues in national documents
such as priorities listed in all the Government
Parties, Ministry for Social Development, and
Large economy with strengths in nationally
significant and exporting industries
1. Falls under the Government’s priority of
building a more competitive and productive
economy. This includes export markets and
innovation. The Waikato region has a significant
proportion of New Zealand’s export-facing
industries. Although key sectors are
concentrated in certain areas, it is also the
second-most diverse economy in New Zealand in
terms of having economic activity spread across
23
Includes Upper North Island / Inter-regional 24
Government’s Priorities: 1. Stronger Economy (including the Business Growth Agenda – see Attachment 1 to this Appendix). 2. Better Public Services (reducing long-term welfare dependency, supporting vulnerable children, boosting skills and employment, reducing crime and improving dealing with Government)
25 http://www.national.org.nz/facebook_priorities/OurPriorities_Twopager_web.pdf
66
across many industries.
2. This is of a national scale given the
contribution to the national economy:
� In 2012 the Waikato region’s estimated
gross domestic product (GDP) was $18.3
billion or 8.9 per cent of New Zealand’s
estimated GDP.
� Employment growth in the Waikato region
over 2002-2012 was slightly higher than
New Zealand as a whole.
3. Requires national-level decisions and actions
to ensure that this continues and that
opportunities are taken full advantage of.
Good quality road and rail transport network
and Nationally significant juncture for road
and rail, and good connections to large and
growing populations in Auckland and
Tauranga
1. Contributes to the Government’s priority of
building a more competitive and productive
economy of which infrastructure is a key part.
2. Waikato has the highest per capita central
government capital investment in transport
and communications, a good quality road
transport network, two of the busiest rail lines
in New Zealand, Hamilton airport and many
smaller airports in the region and the fourth
largest public transport service in New Zealand.
Good quality road and rail as well as the
importance of Upper North Island connections
is included in a number of key national-level
documents including the Government Policy
Statement on Land Transport Funding and
Ministry for Business, Innovation and
Employment26
3. Requires national-level decisions and
actions, eg coordinating education providers,
work being undertaken by Department of
Labour, Ministry for Social Development and
MBIE
Environmental Limits (eg water)
1. Contributes to Government’s priorities -
one of which is freshwater reform and
natural resources including maintaining
environmental standards that preserve and
enhance the quality of the environment.
2. Issue is of a national scale (eg Freshwater
Reform documents and work of the Land and
Water Forum)
3. Requires national-level decisions and
action, including collaborative planning,
regulation at the national level, law changes
and environmental reporting.
Economic inequalities across the region
1. Contributes to the Government’s priority
of building a more competitive and
productive economy and also its social
development goals.
2. There is significant variation in annual
incomes between different territorial
authorities in the Waikato region. The level of
inequality in the Waikato region was 35 per
cent in 2006, decreasing and increasing
slightly before settling at 35 per cent in 2010.
This is also a national level issue. The
many industries.
2. This is of a national scale given the
contribution to the national economy:
� In 2012 the Waikato region’s estimated gross
domestic product (GDP) was $18.3 billion or
8.9 per cent of New Zealand’s estimated
GDP.
� Employment growth in the Waikato region
over 2002-2012 was slightly higher than New
Zealand as a whole.
3. Requires national-level decisions and actions
to ensure that this continues and that
opportunities are taken full advantage of.
Connectivity to the Upper North Island and
gateway to the south
1. Contributes to the Government’s priority of
building a more competitive and productive
economy of which infrastructure is a key part.
2. The importance of Upper North Island
connections is included in a number of key
national-level documents including the
Government Policy Statement on Land Transport
Funding and UNISA documents.
3. Requires national-level decisions and action to
ensure that connections are maintained and
improved in order to build on Waikato’s position
in the Upper North Island and as a transport hub
and also as a gateway to the south.
Leveraging Maori development
1. Part of the Government’s building a more
competitive and productive economy priority.
2. Iwi are active investors in the Waikato region
26
http://www.mbie.govt.nz/news-and-media/news-from-around-mbie/medium-long-term-employment-outlook-released
67
UNISA documents.
3. Requires national-level decisions and action
to ensure that the road and rail network is
maintained and improved in order to build on
Waikato’s position in the Upper North Island
and as a transport hub.
percentage of people with more than
enough, or enough income, to meet every
day needs has decreased in the Waikato
region from 2008 to 2012, while it has
remained relatively static for New Zealand as
a whole. Issue is covered at national level in
various Ministry for Social Development and
Treasury documents.
3. Requires national-level initiatives to help
improve the situation, eg initiatives to
improve living standards, economic
development programmes etc
Encouraging greater innovation and value-
added in key industries
1. Contributes to Government’s priority of
building a more competitive and productive
economy – a key component of which is
innovation.
2. Innovation seen as a prerequisite for
economic growth nationally. See Business
Innovation Progress Report (August 2012).
3. Needs national-level decisions and action,
eg competition policy, public science,
research institutions, the innovation
workforce, innovation infrastructure,
intellectual property law, and international
linkages. This is outlined in the Business
Innovation Progress Report (August 2012).
and have a significant asset base. Maori
development is identified through the
Government’s ‘Business Growth Agenda
Progress Report’ (2013) including key actions
such as the Crown-Māori Economic Growth
Partnership.
3. Requires some national-level leadership, eg
increasing access to international markets,
Maori Tourism Action Plan, improving the
utilisation
and productivity of Māori assets.
Reduce inequalities and raise living standards
for everyone in the region
1. Contributes to the Government’s priority of
building a more competitive and productive
economy and also its social development goals.
2. There is significant variation in annual
incomes between different territorial authorities
in the Waikato region. The level of inequality in
the Waikato region was 35 per cent in 2006,
decreasing and increasing slightly before settling
at 35 per cent in 2010. This is also a national
level issue. The percentage of people with more
than enough, or enough income, to meet every
day needs has decreased in the Waikato region
from 2008 to 2012, while it has remained
relatively static for New Zealand as a whole.
Issue is covered at national level in various
Ministry for Social Development and Treasury
documents.
3. Requires national-level initiatives to help
improve the situation, eg initiatives to improve
living standards, economic development
programmes etc
68
Encourage youth employment
1. Contributes to Government priority of
building a more competitive and productive
economy, delivering better public service targets
(eg to have 85 per cent of 18-year-olds getting
NCEA level 2; to increase the proportion of 25-34
year olds with advanced trade qualifications,
diplomas and degrees) and various education
priorities.
2. The Waikato region has high populations of
young people. Addressing youth employment is
a national issue. Department of Labour material
indicates that youth labour force participation
rates are significantly lower than for the rest of
the population. Various initiatives included in the
‘Business Growth Agenda Progress Report’
(2013).
3. Requires a national-level approach and action
to encourage youth employment, eg Youth
Guarantee initiative.
Regional
1. Waikato-wide
influence / strategic
importance to the
Waikato
2. Evidence that
issue is of a regional
scale (eg included in
regional documents)
3. Requires regional-
level decisions,
actions or
partnership to
resolve and / or
deliver
Relatively high industrial diversity
1. The Waikato region has the second-most
diverse economy in New Zealand in terms of
having economic activity spread across many
industries. This is of strategic importance to
the Waikato.
2. This is of a regional scale as evidenced in the
Waikato Regional Economic Development
Strategy Discussion Document and background
work (eg Economic Development Issues and
Opportunities, MartinJenkins & Beca, 2013).
3. Requires regional-level decisions, action and
partnership to take advantage of this.
Significant benefits from natural resources
Image and Branding
1. This is of significant strategic value to the
Waikato region as it involves capturing the
Waikato region’s competitive advantage and
projecting this nationally and internationally.
2. In a discussion paper released in October
2013, the Waikato Economic Strategy
Governance Group recognised that while
local businesses and residents on the whole
have a positive image of the region, it has not
yet been able to project this outside the
region (Waikato Economic Strategy
Governance Group 2013, 7). It therefore
identified “telling the Waikato story” and
image and branding as a potential strategic
High quality amenities and natural assets
1. Natural amenities are of strategic importance
to the Waikato. The region’s range of natural
assets and amenities make it attractive for
domestic visitors, businesses and current and
potential residents.
2. Identified in the Waikato Regional Economic
Development Strategy as a key opportunity.
3. Requires a regional approach to build on this
opportunity.
Coromandel aquaculture
1. Aquaculture is poised to be an important
export sector. It is specific to the Thames-
Coromandel district but it is of regional
69
1. This is of Waikato-wide influence and of
strategic importance to the Waikato, eg three
of the region’s major industries occupy 83% of
the region’s productive land, versatile soils,
energy resources.
2. The region’s range of natural assets make it
attractive for domestic visitors, businesses and
current and potential residents. The Waikato
region’s economy is closely tied to its
environment. This is outlined in a number of
regional documents eg Waikato Regional
Economic Development Strategy Discussion
Document and Waikato Regional Economic
Profile.
3. Requires regional level decisions, action and
partnership to help build on these while
ensuring that we protect the environment and
understand the limits.
priority. (Waikato Economic Strategy
Governance Group 2013, 8).
3. Requires regional level partnership to
achieve this. Needs a regional commitment to
developing the Waikato’s image and brand.
Perception of business environment and
support for innovation
1. This has Waikato-wide influence as it has
been identified as a perceived common issue
across the region.
2. The Waikato Economic Development
Issues and Options report found through
interviews across the region that businesses
perceive that councils could be more
business friendly and that the regulatory
environment could be improved. There is
also a perception that while there is a wide
range of organisations which aim to support
business development and innovation, in
some industry areas it is felt that research,
education and support could do more to
work with business to help solve their
technical and innovation problems.
3. The Waikato Regional Economic
Development Strategy Discussion Document
identifies the following as a key focus area:
regional coordination of business support
and key account management within each
council, consistency in planning and
regulatory processes across the region, and
better council and industry engagement.
This requires a regional approach.
Not a large base of science and technology
professionals or employment in knowledge
significance given its potential to contribute to
the wider economy. As an additional primary
industry, it offers an opportunity to broaden
value-added food manufacturing in the region.
2. Highlighted in the Waikato Regional Economic
Development Strategy Discussion Document and
background work.
3. Requires regional-level decisions and action,
eg transport / freight connections
Encouraging greater value added from our
natural resource-based and related industries
1. The Waikato region has a significant
proportion of New Zealand’s export-facing
industries but further value could be extracted
by adding value through manufacturing and
provision of services. Encouraging this is of
strategic importance to the region.
2. Highlighted in the Waikato Regional Economic
Development Strategy Discussion Document and
background work.
3. Requires regional level decisions and actions,
eg forestry/wood, food production. This requires
a regional approach.
Telling the Waikato Story
1. This is of significant strategic value to the
Waikato region as it involves articulating the
Waikato region’s value proposition as a place to
live, work, study, invest and visit, and promoting
the region’s natural assets, business successes,
strong events calendar and good infrastructure.
2. In a discussion paper released in October
2013, the Waikato Economic Strategy
Governance Group recognised that while local
businesses and residents on the whole have a
70
intensive industries
1. This is of strategic importance to the
Waikato as a key element of innovation is
having a pool of technical and knowledge-
based skills. The relatively limited pool of
technical skills in the region may be a
constraint on the level of innovation
possible. The limited base of skills in this
area is a region-wide issue.
2. Despite a strong science and technology
sector, particularly off the back of
dominance in agriculture and horticulture,
the Waikato region has a relatively small
base of individuals with science and
technology occupations and qualifications.
This is identified in the Waikato Economic
Development Strategy Background Report as
a regional challenge. Recent data also
suggests that the region’s employment
growth in knowledge intensive industries is
slowing. Between 2009 and 2010 there was
0.1 percent employment growth in
knowledge intensive industries, compared
with 0.9 percent nationally (Infometrics,
2012).
3. Requires a regional approach eg through a
regional labour market strategy and other
initiatives.
Relatively weak performance on measures
of visitor attraction, which is also important
for attracting and retaining skills and
business
1. This is strategic importance to the
Waikato region as a whole given that the
Waikato’s image and identity can play a key
positive image of the region, it has not yet been
able to project this nationally and internationally
(Waikato Economic Strategy Governance Group
2013, 7). It therefore identified “telling the
Waikato story” as a potential strategic priority.
(Waikato Economic Strategy Governance Group
2013, 8).
3. Requires regional level partnership to achieve
this. The Waikato Regional Economic
Development Strategy Discussion Document
notes the following actions / focus areas under
this priority:
� Developing a credible visitor and investment
offer
� Regional tourism strategy
� A regional approach to business and
investment attraction and retention
All of these would require regional-level action,
decisions and partnership.
Coordination of skills initiatives
1. Skill constraints is identified as a regional issue
and better coordination of skills initiatives is a
key potential focus area identified at regional
level. This is of strategic importance to the
Waikato as it would help to address skills
constraints as well as helping to increase levels
of literacy and numeracy and educational
attainment in youth and the workforce and
ensure businesses can attract, develop and
retain the skills they need to grow.
2. Identified as a potential focus area in the
Waikato Regional Economic Development
Strategy Discussion Document.
3. The Waikato Regional Economic Development
Strategy Discussion Document has identified
71
part in retaining and attracting skilled
employees, businesses, investment and
visitors.
2. The region has had relatively weak
performance on measures of visitor
attraction, with low average visitor nights
across all regional tourism organisation
(RTO) areas, and limited growth in visitor
nights in the Hamilton and Waikato RTO
area, although other regional RTOs have
achieved growth in visitor nights at levels at
or above the national average. This was
identified as a regional challenge in the
Waikato Regional Economic Development
Strategy Background Report.
3. Requires regional decisions and
partnership. The Waikato Regional Economic
Development Strategy Discussion Document
identifies developing a regional approach to
business and investment attraction and
retention as a potential key focus area. This
would require a regional partnership
approach.
better coordination of skills initiatives through a
regional labour market strategy as a potential
area of focus. This would require a regional
partnership approach.
The “greening” of growth, including innovation
in sustainability.
1. This is of strategic importance to the Waikato
given that the region’s economy is closely tied to
its environment and environmental limits are
one of four key challenges facing it (as identified
in the Waikato Regional Economic Development
Strategy Discussion Document).“Green growth”
is an approach that could be considered. It
involves economic development that has
positive environmental outcomes.
2. The Waikato’s natural assets was recognised
as one of one of four key opportunities for the
Waikato region in the Waikato Regional
Economic Development Strategy Discussion
Document. The Waikato Regional Council
recognises green growth as a key opportunity. It
also has traction at national level through the
Green Growth Advisory Group set up under
MBIE.
Inter-regional collaboration.
1. Inter-regional collaboration is of strategic
importance to the Waikato given the high
degree of inter-regional interdependence
(Waikato Regional Economic Profile) and the
importance of inter-regional connections to the
Waikato.
2. The Waikato Regional Economic Development
Strategy Discussion Document identified
“Maintaining and building our location
72
advantage” as a potential strategic priority,
which is about continuing to improve inter-
regional and intra-regional linkages. Also
recognised in UNISA documents.
3. Requires regional-level actions and decisions
and inter-regional partnerships, eg UNISA
Improve linkages between research and
education organisations and industry
1. The region needs to improve education
achievement and skills if it is to improve living
standards. (Lower regional educational
achievement noted by MBIE’s Regional
Economic Activity Report)
2. Skills constraints identified as a key challenge
in regional economic development strategy
discussion paper (see ED strategy discussion
paper).
3. A number of players and initiatives but weak
linkages between industry and secondary
education, lack of regionally consistent labour
and skills data and knowledge, monitoring and
evaluation of the success of initiatives and
coordination of current initiatives to ensure
limited resources are targeted at priority areas
(Wintec regional labour market event, economic
development issues and opportunities report)
Sub-Regional
1. Influence beyond
TLA boundary
2. Evidence that
issue is of a sub-
regional scale (eg
included in sub-
regional or regional
documents)
Range of organisations and infrastructure that
support innovation
1. This has an influence beyond TLA boundaries
as the Waikato region as a whole has a
significant range of innovation support
organisations.
2. The Waikato regional economic profile
catalogues the range of tertiary education
Councils not perceived as business-friendly
and common concerns about the costs
associated with consents and complying
with regulations
1. This has an influence beyond individual
TLA boundaries as it has been identified as a
perceived common issue across the region.
2. The Waikato Economic Development
Business-friendly councils
1. This has an influence beyond individual TLA
boundaries as it has been identified as a
perceived common issue across the region.
Encouraging all Councils across the region to
adopt “business friendly” approaches is better
dealt with sub-regionally and regionally as there
could be learnings and gains through a common
73
3. Requires sub-
regional level
decisions, actions or
partnership to
resolve and / or
deliver
institutes in the region, industry training
organisations, Crown research institutes and
Waikato Innovation Park (Waikato Regional
Council 2012, 126). It also noted the presence
of government agencies, membership-based
businesses organisations as well as many
sector-based associations which provide
support to businesses. The majority of these
are located in Hamilton city but serve the
region as a whole.
3. Requires decisions, action and partnership
across the region to build on this strength.
Issues and Options report found through
interviews across the region that businesses
perceive that councils are not as business-
friendly as they would like and there are
common concerns about the costs
associated with consents and complying
with regulations. This indicates that this is
not just an issue for one TLA.
3. The Waikato Regional Economic
Development Strategy Discussion Document
identifies the following as a key focus area:
Key account management within each
council, consistency in planning and
regulatory processes across the region, and
better council and industry engagement.
This requires sub-regional and regional level
action and partnership rather than an
individual TLA approach.
approach.
2. The Waikato Economic Development Issues
and Options report found through interviews
across the region that businesses perceive that
councils are not as business-friendly as they
would like and there are common concerns
about the costs associated with consents and
complying with regulations. This indicates that
this is not just an issue for one TLA.
3. The Waikato Regional Economic Development
Strategy Discussion Document identifies the
following as a key focus area: Key account
management within each council, consistency in
planning and regulatory processes across the
region, and better council and industry
engagement. This requires sub-regional and
regional level action and partnership rather than
an individual TLA approach.
Social Well-Being
Criteria Social Strengths Social Challenges Social Opportunities
Macro / National
1. Contribution to Government’s
Priorities
2. Evidence that issue is of a
national scale (eg included in
national documents)
3. Requires national-level decisions
or action to resolve and / or deliver
Growing Early Childhood Education Rates
1. This is an important national level
strength of the region as it contributes to
the Government’s priorities of ‘Building a
more competitive and productive
economy’ and ‘Delivering Better Public
Services’. The Government has set a
specific target to increase participation in
early childhood education to 98 per cent.
2. Issue is of national scale as evidenced in
Ministry of Education documents (refer to
Social Well-being Report).
3. Requires ongoing national-level action
and partnerships to continue to grow the
Housing
1. Contributes to Government’s priorities
as housing falls under ‘Building
Infrastructure’ which is part of the
Business Growth Agenda
2. National scale issue – work of the
Productivity Commission, introduction of
Housing Accord and Special Housing Areas
Act, social housing reform, funding for
Maori housing.
3. Requires national-level decisions given
scale of the challenge (see social well-
being report):
Strengthening Collaboration with Central
Government
1. Contributes to Government priority of
Delivering Better Public Services as
collaborating with Central Government is
likely to result in more efficient and
effective approaches.
2. Referenced in Better Local Government
programme.
3. Requires national level decisions and
action if there is to be meaningful
collaboration between local government
and central government.
74
rates of early childhood education.
Increase in School-Leavers with formal
qualifications
1. This is an important national level
strength of the region as it contributes to
the Government’s priorities of ‘Building a
more competitive and productive
economy’ and ‘Delivering Better Public
Services’. The Government has set a
specific target to have 85 per cent of 18-
year-olds getting NCEA level 2.
2. Issue is of national scale as evidenced in
Ministry of Education documents (refer to
Social Well-being Report).
3. Requires ongoing national-level action
and partnerships to continue to increase
the number of school-leavers with formal
qualifications.
“In 2009, 27 percent of New Zealand
households spent more than 30 percent of
their disposable income on housing
costs”27
“In 2006, 389,600 people, or 10 percent of
the New Zealand resident population,
lived in households requiring one or more
additional bedrooms to adequately
accommodate household members, based
on the criteria in the Canadian Crowding
Index”28
Unemployment
1. This is an important national level
strength of the region as it contributes to
the Government’s priorities of ‘Building a
more competitive and productive
economy’ and ‘Delivering Better Public
Services’. For example there is a specific
Government target to reduce the number
of people who have been on the Job
Seeker Support benefit for more than 12
months.
2. There is evidence that this is a national
level issue – NZ’s unemployment rate is
currently sitting at around 6%29
.
3. Unemployment requires national led
initiatives and actions as well as regional
ones.
Poverty
1. Contributes to Government priorities of
27
Direct copy from Social Report: http://socialreport.msd.govt.nz/documents/economic-standard-of-living-social-report-2010.pdf 28
Direct copy from Social Report: http://socialreport.msd.govt.nz/documents/economic-standard-of-living-social-report-2010.pdf 29
Statistics NZ, fourth quarter of 2013
75
‘Building a more competitive and
productive economy’ and Social
Development.
2. Issue is of a national scale and identified
in a number of national level documents,
particularly child poverty.
3. Requires national level decisions and
actions, eg Ministerial Committee on
Poverty.
Disproportionate numbers of Maori and
Pasifika in statistics for low education
achievement, poor health,
unemployment, poverty and crime (as
both victims and offenders)
1. Contributes to Government priorities of
‘Building a more competitive and
productive economy’ and delivering
better public services (eg social
development, education, law and order,
health).
2. Identified in Ministry of Education,
Ministry of Health, Ministry of Justice, Te
Puni Kokiri documents. See Social Well-
being report for key areas, eg life
expectancy, educational qualifications,
crime statistics, income levels etc).
3. Requires national level decisions and
action to address as these are complicated
and overlapping challenges.
Regional
1. Waikato-wide influence /
strategic importance to the
Waikato
2. Evidence that issue is of a
regional scale (eg included in
Less Crime
1. Contributes to Government’s priority of
Delivering better public service, which has
a specific target to reduce the rate of
crime by 15 per cent, the rate of violent
Issues for Youth (eg employment,
education, health, housing, youth
offending and victimisation)
1. The Waikato region has high
populations of young people. Addressing
Reduction in Duplicating efforts
1. This is of strategic importance to the
Waikato as it would help to improve
efficiency and effectiveness in dealing
with social issues across the region.
76
regional documents)
3. Requires regional-level
decisions, actions or partnership to
resolve and / or deliver
crime by 20 per cent and the rate of youth
crime by 25 per cent. Crime is of strategic
importance to the Waikato given its
implications.
2. Issue is of a regional scale. See Social
Well-being report for data.
3. Requires regional level decisions to
ensure that the lower crime rates
continue.
Increased Life Expectancy
1. This is a key indicator of health so is of
strategic importance to the Waikato
region.
2. This is a regional strength attributed
mainly to better standards of living and
improved health care. It should be noted
that there still remain marked differences
in life expectancy for different ethnic
groups.
3. Requires regional level actions to
ensure that this continues (eg region-wide
DHB and other health initiatives).
issues facing youth such as skills, training,
education, crime, health and social
development is of strategic importance to
the Waikato as this assists with social,
cultural and economic well-being.
2. There is evidence that issues for youth
are of at least a regional scale (see Social
Well-being report for data).
3. Requires a regional-level approach and
action to address the issues facing youth.
2. Social well-being report indicates this is
a potential issue for the Waikato DHB,
Councils etc and that there is an
opportunity to collaborate and reduce
duplication.
3. Requires a regional-level approach to
collaborate across all of the organisations.
Sub-Regional
1. Influence beyond TLA boundary
2. Evidence that issue is of a sub-
regional scale (eg included in sub-
regional or regional documents)
3. Requires sub-regional level
decisions, actions or partnership to
resolve and / or deliver
Information Sharing
1. This has an influence beyond TLA
boundaries as it involves the sharing of
information between areas to improve
social issues across the region.
2. Social well-being report indicates this is
a potential issue for the Waikato DHB,
Councils etc and that there is an
opportunity to collaborate and share
information to achieve better outcomes.
3. Requires sub-regional action to
promote information sharing between
77
different areas.
Cultural Well-Being
Criteria Cultural Strengths Cultural Challenges Cultural Opportunities
Macro / National
1. Contribution to Government’s
Priorities
2. Evidence that issue is of a
national scale (eg included in
national documents)
3. Requires national-level decisions
or action to resolve and / or deliver
Unique Maori Culture and Heritage
1. Leveraging Maori cultural base for
growth identified as part of delivering on
the Government’s Business Growth
Agenda
2. Identified in national documents
(Historic Places Trust and in Te Puni Kokiri,
eg Statement of Intent)
3. Requires national-level decisions /
action to ensure that this is maintained
and enhanced.
Cultural Capital, eg uniquely Waikato
events/festivals
1. Contributes to Government’s priority of
building a more competitive and
productive economy including through
export markets as tourism and promoting
regions is part of the business growth
agenda.
2. Importance of regional tourism and
culture identified in NZ Tourism Strategy
2015.
3. Requires national level decisions and
action to enhance and build on cultural
capital.
Engaging Youth
1. Youth feature quite strongly in the
Government’s Building a more
competitive and productive economy
priority area, this includes in the areas of
skills, training, education, crime and social
development. Engaging with youth would
contribute to achieving good outcomes in
a number of these areas.
2. There is evidence that issues for youth
are of a national scale (see also Social
Well-being report).
3. Requires a national-level approach and
action to promote youth engagement.
Increasing recognition of the benefits of
cultural investments through expansion
of our ‘cultural capital’.
(see Cultural Capital under national-level
Strengths)
Increased emphasis on the value,
protection and education of our Maori
heritage
(see unique Maori Cultural and Heritage
under national-level Strengths)
Regional
1. Waikato-wide influence /
strategic importance to the
Waikato
2. Evidence that issue is of a
Range of opportunities for Leisure, Sport
and Art facilities (eg centres of
excellence)
1. Leisure, sport and art facilities are of
Accurately valuing and maximising
strengths
1. Has a Waikato-wide influence and is of
strategic importance as this needs to be
Raising profile of Waikato identify and
pride
1. This is a Waikato-wide opportunity and
of strategic importance given the need to
78
regional scale (eg included in
regional documents)
3. Requires regional-level
decisions, actions or partnership to
resolve and / or deliver
strategic importance to the Waikato.
Potential for a coordinated approach to
regional facility planning and co-operative
investment to support regional facilities.
2. Issue is of a regional scale as evidenced
by work being undertaken by Creative
Waikato and Sport Waikato.
3. Requires regional-level decision and
partnerships in order to take advantage of
opportunities (see Waikato Creative
Facilities Plan and Waikato Regional
Facility Sport Plan currently under
development).
Waikato’s central location and strong
natural amenities valued by its residents
1. Location and natural amenities are of
strategic importance to the Waikato.
2. Identified in the Waikato Regional
Economic Development Strategy as a key
opportunity.
3. Requires a regional approach to build
on this opportunity.
achieved across the region not just in one
local area.
2. Issue is of regional scale and is referred
to in the Waikato Regional Economic
Development Strategy discussion
document.
3. Requires a regional approach.
Capturing ‘Waikato Stories’
1. This challenge is region-wide and it is a
matter that is of strategic importance to
the Waikato in order to extend our
knowledge on our values, beliefs and
identities.
2. Challenge is of regional scale – referred
to in the Waikato Regional Economic
Development Strategy discussion
document.
3. Requires a regional approach, action
and partnership to capture Waikato
stories.
Greater investment in heritage, arts,
sport and leisure
(see opportunities for Leisure, Sport and
Art facilities under national-level
Strengths)
Leveraging off the region’s major events
(see cultural capital under national-level
strengths)
Increasing residents’ engagement with
arts and culture equal to or above the
national average
1. Arts and culture are of strategic
‘Tell the Waikato Story’ and raise the
region’s profile – this is important for
existing residents as well as for attracting
people and businesses to the Waikato.
2. Opportunity is of regional scale as it
requires a region-wide approach not just a
sub-regional one.
3. Requires regional-level decisions,
actions and partnership to raise the
region’s profile.
Increasing protection of historic heritage
1. Has influence beyond individual TLA
boundaries (eg significant historic sites)
2. Identified in regional documents as well
as sub-regional (eg RPS, Tāngata Whenua
Management Plans, Future Proof etc).
3. Requires sub-regional decisions and
action given that heritage needs to be
promoted, improved and protected in
joint arrangements that go beyond
individual districts.
Greater value could be generated from
the Waikato base of destination assets
1. Waikato-wide influence and of strategic
importance in order to promote all of the
destination assets in a cohesive way.
2. Importance of regional tourism
identified in Waikato Regional Economic
Development Strategy discussion
document.
3. Requires regional level decisions and
action to build on this.
Having a clear, articulated and agreed
79
importance to the Waikato. Potential for
greater engagement through a regional
approach.
2. Issue is of a regional scale as evidenced
by work being undertaken by Creative
Waikato.
3. Requires regional-level decision and
partnerships in order to lift engagement
levels.
value proposition for the region
1. This is a Waikato-wide opportunity and
of strategic importance given the need for
a clear value proposition in order to ‘Tell
the Waikato Story’
2. Opportunity is of regional scale as it
requires a region-wide approach not just a
sub-regional one.
3. Requires regional-level decisions,
actions and partnership to have a clear,
articulated and agreed value proposition.
Better coordination of regional marketing
promotion
1. This is a Waikato-wide opportunity and
of strategic importance given the need to
‘Tell the Waikato Story’ in a coordinated
manner in order to promote the Waikato
as a place to live, work, study in, visit and
invest in.
2. Opportunity is of regional scale as it
requires a region-wide approach not just a
sub-regional one.
3. Requires regional-level decisions,
actions and partnership to have a
coordinated position.
Enhancing access to and participation in
cultural activities
1. Cultural activities are of strategic
importance to the Waikato. Potential for
greater levels of access and participation
through a regional approach.
2. Issue is of a regional scale as evidenced
by work being undertaken by Creative
Waikato.
80
3. Requires regional-level decision and
partnerships in order to improve access
and participation levels.
Sub-Regional
1. Influence beyond TLA boundary
2. Evidence that issue is of a sub-
regional scale (eg included in sub-
regional or regional documents)
3. Requires sub-regional level
decisions, actions or partnership to
resolve and / or deliver
Significant natural features that are
culturally linked to their landscape
1. Significant natural features with cultural
linkages often have an influence beyond
TLA boundary, eg geothermal area in and
around Taupo, our coastlines, the DOC
estate and our fresh waterways.
2. Identified in documents such as the RPS
as well as sub-regional and local
strategies.
3. Requires sub-regional level partnerships
to ensure that these significant areas are
better understood and protected as well
as promoted.
Cultural diversity
1. Has an influence beyond individual TLA
boundaries. However trends towards
greater cultural diversity are not evenly
distributed across the region’s territorial
authorities – certain TLAs or sub-regions
have greater cultural diversity than others.
2. Most TLAs recognise the importance of
thriving communities where diversity and
activities/events are encouraged in the
Long-Term Plans and other documents.
Referenced at sub-regional level in
strategies such Future Proof.
3. Supporting the growth of cultural
diversity requires sub-regional level
actions and partnerships.
Supporting growth of cultural diversity
1. Has an influence beyond individual TLA
boundaries. However trends towards
greater cultural diversity are not evenly
distributed across the region’s territorial
authorities – certain TLAs or sub-regions
have greater cultural diversity than others.
2. Most TLAs recognise the importance of
thriving communities where diversity and
activities/events are encouraged in the
Long-Term Plans and other documents.
Referenced at sub-regional level in
strategies such Future Proof.
3. Supporting the growth of cultural
diversity requires sub-regional level
actions and partnerships.
Strengthening community and fostering
diversity
(see ‘supporting growth of cultural
diversity’ under sub-regional cultural
challenges).
81
Environmental Well-Being
Criteria Environmental Strengths Environmental Challenges Environmental Opportunities
Macro / National
1. Contribution to Government’s
Priorities30
2. Evidence that issue is of a
national scale (eg included in
national documents)
3. Requires national-level decisions
or action to resolve and / or deliver
High percentage of high class soils
1. This contributes to the Government’s
priorities around building a more build a
more competitive and productive
economy. The Waikato has some of the
most productive soils in New Zealand and
therefore contributes significantly in the
areas of primary production.
2. This is a matter of national importance
– significance of primary industries to
national economy, particularly exports
highlighted in Government’s Business
Growth Agenda.
3. Requires national-level decisions and
action to ensure that the Region continues
to have high class soils and to use these in
a sustainable way.
Good source of renewables
1. Building Infrastructure is part of the
Government’s Business Growth Agenda
(under the building a more competitive
and productive economy priority).
Building Infrastructure has a focus on
securing energy as a key initiative – this
includes supporting renewable energy.
2. National-scale issue given that it is
recognised in the National Energy Strategy
2011-2021. This Strategy targets achieving
90% of the country’s electricity generation
from renewable sources by 2025.
Degraded water quality
1. Contributes to Government’s priorities -
one of which is freshwater reform
2. Issue is of a national scale (Freshwater
Reform documents and work of the Land
and Water Forum)
3. Requires national-level decisions and
action, including collaborative planning,
regulation at the national level, law
changes and environmental reporting
Increasing and competing demand for
fresh water
1. Contributes to Government’s priorities -
one of which is freshwater reform
2. Issue is of a national scale (Freshwater
Reform documents and work of the Land
and Water Forum)
3. Requires national-level decisions and
action, including collaborative planning,
regulation at the national level, law
changes and environmental reporting
Contamination and loss of soil through
intensive and inappropriate land use
1. A central priority for the Government is
to build a more competitive and
productive economy. A New Zealand’s
productive sector is reliant on good
quality soils. Government has also
signalled environmental protection as an
Ensuring that economic growth is joined
up with environmental limits
1. The economic growth of the Waikato
region has a strong correlation with its
natural resources. Several key industries
identified are reliant on natural resources,
some of which are reaching their limit in
terms of degradation and over-use.
Natural resources are a priority area for
the Government – this includes
environmental protection.
2. Various aspects of this recognised at
national level, eg work of the Land and
Water Forum, national environmental
standards and national policy statements.
3. The scale and significance of this matter
requires national-level decisions and
actions in order to have the debate and
then come up with solutions.
30
Note that Government’s environmental priorities are around freshwater and climate change
82
3. Requires national-level initiatives and
collaboration to build on the Waikato’s
significant renewable electricity resources.
Steady supply of freshwater
1. Contributes to Government’s priorities -
one of which is the importance of
freshwater
2. Issue is of a national scale (Freshwater
Reform documents and work of the Land
and Water Forum)
3. Requires national-level decisions and
action, including collaborative planning,
regulation at the national level, law
changes and environmental reporting in
order to ensure that this remains a
regional strength
area to be addressed under natural
resources.
2. There is a national environmental
standard on contaminants in soil.
Recognised as an issue at a national level.
See environmental well-being report for
documented regional information on soil
quality and soil loss.
3. Requires national-level decisions and
action to resolve given the tensions
between our productive sectors and the
impact on the environment.
Regional
1. Waikato-wide influence /
strategic importance to the
Waikato
2. Evidence that issue is of a
regional scale (eg included in
regional documents)
3. Requires regional-level
decisions, actions or partnership to
resolve and / or deliver
Mild year-round climate
1. Climate of the Waikato is a region-wide
strength. It is strategic as it supports the
high levels of primary production within
the region.
2. A mild climate is a regional scale matter
– the Region tends to have warm, humid
summers and mild winters. No location is
more than 80 km from the sea which
means temperatures are quite regulated.
3. This strength doesn’t require any
decisions or actions, however it is a
regional strength that can be promoted.
A region where the economic benefits of
good environmental outcomes are
valued
1. This is of strategic importance to the
Degraded water quality
1. Waikato-wide influence (see water
quality map and findings of environmental
well-being report
”Overall there has been a net
deterioration in river water quality across
the region”). Strategically significant given
the importance of water to the region.
2. Issue is of a regional scale (See Regional
Policy Statement, Regional Plan and
community outcomes at regional level)
3. Requires regional-level decisions and
action, including collaborative planning,
working together through the RPS and
Regional Plan mechanisms)
Decline in the health and extent of
biodiversity
Taking an ecosystem services approach
to describe impact that activities are
having on our environment.
1. Has Waikato-wide influence and is of
strategic importance to the region. See
Environmental Well-being report at page
88: The total value of ecosystem services
in the region was calculated at $9.4 billion
in 1997, which is 12.4 billion in 2009
dollars.
2. Issue is of regional scale. Environmental
Well-being report has shown that many of
the region’s natural resources are
declining in quality and quantity due to
the way in which they are being used.
Recognised in the Proposed RPS.
3. Requires a regional-level approach,
decisions and partnership to implement.
83
Waikato given that much of the region’s
economic development is dependent
upon natural resources.
Surveys carried out indicate that a
significant proportion of the community
are of the view that a healthy
environment is necessary for a healthy
economy.
2. Recognised in the Proposed RPS and in
the Waikato Economic Development
Strategy Discussion Document.
3.Good environmental outcomes require
regional-level decisions, actions and
partnerships given the cross-boundary
and inter-related nature of a number of
environmental impacts.
1. Waikato-wide influence (see section 5.2
of environmental well-being report)
2. Evidence in well-being report that issue
is of regional scale. Also addressed in
Proposed RPS.
3. Requires regional-level action. Well-
being report notes that there should be
regional collaboration to improve
biodiversity information.
Effects of climate – increasing frequency
of extreme climate events (droughts /
floods)
1. Projected to alter the climate
conditions of the whole region.
2. Issue is of regional scale – eg potential
increased flood events, drought, sea level
rise etc
3. Requires regional action and
partnership to prepare for, plan and
manage effects
Provide for consideration of cumulative
effects of land use decisions on natural
resources.
1. This is a Waikato-wide opportunity.
2. Importance of considering cumulative
effects recognised in the Proposed RPS.
3. Requires regional-level decisions and
partnership as this would allow
consideration of management decisions
across jurisdictions and across
environments (land / water and water /
coast etc) across environments.
Maintaining a healthy environment for
natural resources as a key asset for
future economic growth.
1. This is of strategic importance to the
Waikato given that much of the region’s
economic development is dependent
upon natural resources.
2. Recognised in the Proposed RPS and in
the Waikato Economic Development
Strategy Discussion Document.
3. Good environmental outcomes require
regional-level decisions, actions and
partnerships given the cross-boundary
and inter-related nature of a number of
environmental impacts.
Sub-Regional
1. Influence beyond TLA boundary
2. Evidence that issue is of a sub-
regional scale (eg included in sub-
regional or regional documents)
3. Requires sub-regional level
decisions, actions or partnership to
An extensive and varied coastal
environment
1. Coastal environment in the Waikato
does have influence beyond individual TLA
boundaries.
2. Matter is of sub-regional scale as it is a
Degraded water quality
1. Influence beyond TLA boundary (see
water quality map and findings of
environmental well-being report).
2. Issue is of a sub-regional scale
(identified as a key issue by TLAs)
Collaboration to fill information gaps
1. The collaboration required in order to
fill the information gaps is sub-regional
and regional and requires more than an
individual TLA response.
2. Data gaps are well documented on
84
resolve and / or deliver strength for Waikato, Otorohanga,
Waitomo, Thames-Coromandel and
Hauraki Districts
3. At times requires sub-regional level
decisions because of cross-boundary
impacts and interplay between the land
and the coastal environment, for instance
land use in coastal areas and coastal
marine area activities through the
Regional Council.
3. Requires at least sub-regional level
decisions and action, including
collaborative planning and environmental
reporting.
Incomplete information on some
resources (eg coastal and marine
environment and
natural hazards)
1. Information on coastal marine
environment and natural hazards would
be useful to all TLAs and the Regional
Council as these often have an influence
beyond TLA boundaries.
2. Data gaps are well documented on page
86 of the environmental well-being
report. This illustrates that the issue is at
least a sub-regional one.
3. Filling these data gaps requires at least
a sub-regional approach and probably a
regional one in order to integrate
information.
pages 86 and 89 of the environmental
well-being report. This illustrates that the
issue is at least a sub-regional one and the
importance of regional collaboration.
3. This level of collaboration requires at
least sub-regional level decisions, actions
and partnerships in order to acquire
consistent information.
85
Methodology and Analysis for Determining Headline Strengths, Challenges and Opportunities
Significance nationally and
regionally
Has an impact on other well-
beings
Issue of high importance to the
community or significant
benefit
Strengths
Nationally significant transport juncture
and connections to Auckland and Tauranga
Contributes to Government
priorities of building a more
competitive and productive
economy of which infrastructure
is a key part. Waikato has the
highest per capita central
government capital investment
in transport and
communications, a good quality
road transport network, two of
the busiest rail lines in New
Zealand.
Impacts on economic and social
well-being
The Waikato region’s transport
connections are a key influence
on economic performance. These
transport connections can
influence business investment
and location decisions; and can
reduce costs for firms, workers
and the public.
Contribution to national economy through
important industry sectors
Contributes to Government
priorities of building a more
competitive and productive
economy. Industry sectors are
both nationally and regionally
significant, eg agriculture and
energy.
Impacts on economic and social
well-being
Employment opportunities or
attracting business to the district
identified as a key issue for the
community (41% identified this
as a main issue in the Waikato
Regional Perception Survey,
2013).
Hamilton as the Waikato centre for
innovation, employment and services
Contributes to Government
priorities of building a more
competitive and productive
economy. Hamilton has strong
economic and population
growth. Identified in a number of
regional documents as being the
primary centre for the Waikato.
Impacts on economic, social and
cultural well-being
Employment opportunities or
attracting business to the district
identified as a key issue for the
community (41% identified this
as a main issue in the Waikato
Regional Perception Survey,
2013).
86
Innovation is a key driver of
regional competitiveness and
economic growth. Productivity
performance is linked to
concentrations of investment
and labour.
Challenges
Economic inequalities across the region Contributes to the Government’s
priority of building a more
competitive and productive
economy and also its social
development goals. Issue is of
significance regionally but it is
also a national challenge.
Impacts on economic, social and
cultural well-being
Employment opportunities or
attracting business to the district
identified as a key issue for the
community (41% identified this
as a main issue in the Waikato
Regional Perception Survey,
2013). The second main issue for
the community related to
financial or economic issues
(21%).
An ageing population and shrinking skill
base
All foreseeable growth in New
Zealand's TA's will be at 65+
years, and most will see decline
in other age groups. Every year
for the next 15 years a
successively larger cohort will
retire (or reduce its participation)
and will be 'replaced' by a
successively smaller cohort at
labour market entry age. This is a
regional and a national
challenge.
Impacts on economic, social and
cultural well-being
The loss of human capital arising
from depopulation and ageing
populations identified in the top
three common challenges across
the region.
Declining rural populations and associated
decline in services
The sub-national end of
growth/onset of absolute decline
now affects 36 per cent of NZ
Impacts on economic, social and
cultural well-being
The loss of human capital arising
from depopulation and ageing
populations, and the affordability
87
TLA’s. Will become increasingly
intractable as structural ageing
progresses and natural increase
diminishes. This decline in rural
populations in particular is
leading to altered local demand
and consumption patterns
affecting the provision and
location of services (eg schools,
supermarkets, health care,
leisure and transport). This is
both a significant regional and
national issue.
of infrastructure identified in the
top three common challenges
across the region.
Water quality and water allocation Contributes to Government’s
priorities - one of which is
freshwater reform. Issue is of a
national scale but is also a
particular issue in the Waikato
given that for a significant part of
the region water is over-
allocated and water quality in
some urban and rural areas is
degraded.
Impacts on economic, social,
cultural and environmental well-
being
5% increase in mention of water
related issues in the Waikato
Regional Perception Survey, 2013
compared to 2010
Opportunities Maximising opportunities, including
investment, through aligned planning
Of significance nationally and
regionally given the efficiency
savings by acting collectively with
central Government on high
priority issues, consistency with
where the Local Government
Commission is heading in terms
of speaking with one region-wide
voice, strategic long-term
planning, simplified and
Impacts on economic, social,
cultural and environmental well-
being
Efficiency savings for NZ Inc and
Waikato Ratepayers (cost savings
could be anywhere from 40 to 50
million over 10 years just for
having fewer plans, policies,
bylaws and common planning
procedures)
88
streamlined processes and
efficiency initiatives such as
shared services.
Leveraging Maori development Part of the Government’s
building a more competitive and
productive economy priority. Iwi
are active investors in the
Waikato region and have a
significant asset base. Maori
development is identified
through the Government’s
‘Business Growth Agenda
Progress Report’ (2013).
Impacts on economic, social,
cultural and environmental well-
being
Significant potential benefit to
the regional community given
the economic outcomes (iwi
investments, landholdings etc) as
well as the social, cultural and
environmental programmes (eg
Waikato-Tainui employment and
training initiatives, Waikato
Raupatu River Trust etc).
Connectivity to the Upper North Island Contributes to the Government’s
priority of building a more
competitive and productive
economy of which infrastructure
is a key part. The importance of
Upper North Island connections
is included in a number of key
national-level documents
including the Government Policy
Statement on Land Transport
Funding and UNISA documents.
Impacts on economic, social,
cultural and environmental well-
being
Upper North Island of New
Zealand is critical to New
Zealand’s economic success and
in turn the success of the
Waikato. Significant benefits for
the Waikato community from a
collective partner approach and
enhancing these connections.
89
Attachment 1 to Appendix 1: Regional Economic Activity Report – Examples of Business Growth Agenda Actions Relevant to the Waikato