W3C XKMS Workshop B2B Requirements
description
Transcript of W3C XKMS Workshop B2B Requirements
W3C XKMS WorkshopB2B Requirements
Mark Curtis, CTO RSGV0.3 19th July 2001
CTO Research & Standards Group
Agenda
Reuters B2B Overview Dimensions of B2B Commerce XKMS Trust Requirements/Issues Recommendations
CTO Research & Standards Group
Reuters Business Operations
Not just a News Agency Information Company
– Financial Markets– Corporate Treasurers and Bond Managers– Newspaper, Broadcasters, News Agencies
Transactions– Foreign Exchange Dealing
~ >50% of world spot fx transactions~ Instinet, worlds leading agency broker
From knowing to doing
“Fortunately, there is a model for the future shape of B2B: the financial service industry”
Beyond the Exchange: The Future of B2B, Harvard Business Review Nov-Dec 2000
CTO Research & Standards Group
What do we mean by B2B?
FOCUS ACCOUNTS
‘Customer Intimacy’
CONSULTATIVE ACCOUNTS
BUSINESS DIRECT
CHANNEL PARTNER
INDIVIDUALS DIRECT
eg Merrill Lynch
B2B
eg Cazenove & Co
B2B
eg Vodafone
B2B
eg via Charles Schwab
B2B2BB2B2C
eg Reuters PF
B2C
Global Strategic Partnerships
Package SolutionsLeadership
Operational Efficiency Distribution
Partner Driven
Mass Operational Efficiency
Future Business Models based on Customer Segmentation
CTO Research & Standards Group
B2B/XKMS Activities
Business Process Integration with Customers– Procurement, payment, service etc
CTO Research & Standards Group
B2B/XKMS Activities
Business Integration with Customers– Procurement, payment, service etc
Information Supply Chain Integration– Digital rights/obligations management
Contributors Reuters Systems
and Products
Distributors and
Channel Partners
Network Services
and Providers
Consumers
CTO Research & Standards Group
B2B/XKMS Activities
Business Process Integration with Customers– Procurement, payment, service etc
Information Supply Chain Integration– Digital rights/obligations management
Aggregation of Business Venues/Exchanges– Publish offers
~ Indication of interest (IOI)~ Price vs. Value
– Trade~ Range of different trading models
CTO Research & Standards Group
Aggregation of Business Venues
Registration– Portable registration attributes e.g. FSA money laundering checks
Common authentication framework– View offer in one channel, select the offer and ‘automate’ execution in
another e.g. SSO
Internal status of trader– Role, responsibilities
External position status of trader– Credit allocation to particular organisation– Market credit position– Dynamic status services
Dispute Resolution– Who did what, when, and why
CTO Research & Standards Group
What does XKMS give us?
Low tier service– Certificate resolution
~ In a B2B world we know who we are dealing with-we can already resolve certs
~ Good to move to standard model
– Higher level interface into PKI services~ We have already developed these internally~ Map our interfaces to those of XKMS
Higher tier services– More consumable application level trust services– Easier to map to business models and requirements
CTO Research & Standards Group
B2B Issues
Operability across multiple domains– User centric key registration service vs. application level
centric key registration service
Interoperability between domains– Trust relationship
~ User defined~ Service defined
Business relevant trust attributes– Context of business– Meta data for acceptance
CTO Research & Standards Group
B2B Issues
Service association– Information may be distributed
Third party attribute and service association– Rules for association
Privacy– Conditions for disclosure of information– User defined
Administration
CTO Research & Standards Group
XKMS Adoption
Technical Framework– High level interfaces
~ SDKs tend to be clunky~ Packaging is important
– Service integration
Policy Framework– Aligned to business verticals?– Privacy
Standards Framework– XKMS (XKISS,XKRSS, XTASS), SAML, XACML, MPEG21…– ebXML, UDDI, LDAP….
CTO Research & Standards Group
Challenges
Acceptance– Solve problems not just package them
Usability– High level interfaces– Configuration vs. coding
Interoperability– Relevant business context
Architectural consistency– Clearly identified boundaries and relationships between
standards
CTO Research & Standards Group
Recommendations
Push ahead with definition of lower tier service levels– Test against real ‘business driven’ scenarios
Outline scope and requirements for the provision of
higher tier services
Map out relationships and interfaces to other standard
activities operating in this space– Remove confusion, provide focus and prevent duplication
W3C XKMS WorkshopB2B Requirements
Mark Curtis, CTO RSGV0.2 11th July 2001