W2 L2 Air Pollution Concentration Models

download W2 L2 Air Pollution Concentration Models

of 40

Transcript of W2 L2 Air Pollution Concentration Models

  • 7/28/2019 W2 L2 Air Pollution Concentration Models

    1/40

    AIR POLLUTION

    CONCENTRATION

    MODELS

    1

  • 7/28/2019 W2 L2 Air Pollution Concentration Models

    2/40

    Air pollution concentration models

    Allows prediction of concentration from a

    specific set of pollutant emissions

    For any specified meteorological conditions

    At any locations

    For any time period

    There are may types of models from simple to

    complex. But all models are not ideal.

    2

  • 7/28/2019 W2 L2 Air Pollution Concentration Models

    3/40

    BOX MODELS

    Conservation of mass principle applied to relatively large

    scale systems such as an urban airshed

    INPUT - OUTPUT + GENERATION - CONSUMPTION = ACCUMULATION

    Steady state rarely of interest, we are usually interested

    in modelling, explaining, predicting, preventing severe

    air pollution episodes of a transient nature

    Wind, emission, and ambient monitoring data required

    for meaningful modelling work

  • 7/28/2019 W2 L2 Air Pollution Concentration Models

    4/40

    Fixed-Box Model

    Simple box model of a rectangular city. 8 assumptions (see text book)

  • 7/28/2019 W2 L2 Air Pollution Concentration Models

    5/40

    SIMPLE FIXED-BOX MODEL OF A CITY

    boxleavingairinionconcentratpollutant=

    speedwind=

    heightmixing=

    windofdirectioninboxoflength=

    source)(areacityin theareaunitper

    rateemissionmasspollutant=

    airenteringinionconcentratpollutant"background"=

    6.7)eqn(

    c

    u

    H

    L

    q

    b

    uH

    qLbc

  • 7/28/2019 W2 L2 Air Pollution Concentration Models

    6/40

    Example 6.1 (page 122)

    A city has the following description: W= 5 km, L = 15km, H = 1000 m. The wind velocity u = 3 m/s (at

    direction L) , the background concentration of CO is b =

    5 g/m3. The emission rate per unit area q = 4 10-6

    g/sm2. Determine the CO concentration over the city.

    6

    uH

    qLbc

    Directly substitute into

    the equation 6.7;

    3m

    g25205

    10003

    1500045

    c

  • 7/28/2019 W2 L2 Air Pollution Concentration Models

    7/40

    Example 6.2 (page 123)

    For the city in Example 6.1, the meteorologicalconditions (u = 3 m/s, H = 1000 m) occur 40% of the

    time. For the remaining 60%, the wind blows at right

    angles (in W direction) at velocity 6 m/svand at the

    same mixing height. What is the annual averageconcentration of CO in this city?

    7

    Find the concentration at 60% of the time:

    3mg33.833.35

    10006500045

    c

    Sum up the values from previous example:

    Annual average concentration = 25(0.4) + 8.33(0.6) = 15 g/m3

  • 7/28/2019 W2 L2 Air Pollution Concentration Models

    8/40

    To apply this eqn to find situation in which highest

    conc occur., we need to know the worst case for all

    the parameters (wind speed, mixing height, etc. ) Larsen proposed a simpler form by holding u, L & H

    constant, we get a linear graph like Fig 6.2.

    If for example the concentration c1 with emissionrate q1, then to reduce conc to c2, we can find q2.

    8

    bc

    bc

    q

    q

    L

    uHbcq

    1

    2

    1

    222 or

  • 7/28/2019 W2 L2 Air Pollution Concentration Models

    9/40

    Fractional reduction in emission rate

    If the current pollutant conc exceeds the

    standard guideline, then we must make c2 &

    q2 (the new conc) lower than c1 & q1.

    Fractional reduction in emission rate can be

    computed using:

    9

    bc

    cc

    bc

    bc

    qq

    qqq

    1

    21

    1

    2

    1

    2

    1

    21

    1

    1rateemissionin

    reductionFractional(Eqn 6.11)

  • 7/28/2019 W2 L2 Air Pollution Concentration Models

    10/40

    Example 6.3 (page 125)

    The ambient air quality standard for particulates (TSP) in USAin 1971 was 75 g/m3. In 1970, annual average particle

    concentration measured at one monitoring station was 190

    g/m3. The background concentration was estimated to be 20

    g/m3

    . By what percentage would the emission rate ofparticulates have to be reduced below the 1970 level in order

    to meet the 1971 ambient air quality standard?

    10

    bc

    cc

    1

    21

    rateemissionin

    reductionFractional

    67%or67.020190

    75190

  • 7/28/2019 W2 L2 Air Pollution Concentration Models

    11/40

    MULTIPLE BOX MODEL OF A CITY

    THE URBAN AIRSHED MODEL - UAM

    Mass balances (including generation and

    consumption terms) written for many boxes of

    typically 2-5 km square and ~ 102 meters high.

    Each box is considered to be well mixed.

    Boxes can have mass fluxes to/from all adjacent

    boxes.

    Inputs are time variant emission and wind patterns

    as well as solar flux (for ozone photochemistry)

    Outputs are time variant concentrations of pollutant

    in each box.

  • 7/28/2019 W2 L2 Air Pollution Concentration Models

    12/40

    Figure 6.10 de Nevers

    UAM scheme

  • 7/28/2019 W2 L2 Air Pollution Concentration Models

    13/40

    What is Dispersion?

    Dispersion: The act or process to drive off or

    scatter in different directions

    Key parameters:

    Diffusion due to concentration gradient

    Mean air motion that transport pollutants

    downwind

    Turbulent velocity fluctuations that disperse

    pollutants in all directions

    13

  • 7/28/2019 W2 L2 Air Pollution Concentration Models

    14/40

    DIFFUSION MODELS

    It is possible to estimate the air contaminant

    levels with higher degree of reliability the=anthe fixed-box model.

    With knowledge of meteorological

    phenomena & variables in weather systems. Can be used as basis for devising air pollution

    prevention & abatement programs.

    14

  • 7/28/2019 W2 L2 Air Pollution Concentration Models

    15/40

    The Gaussian Plume Idea

    Based on material balance.

    Consider a point source such as a factory

    smokestack and attempts to compute the

    downwind conc resulting from this point

    source.

    Figure 6.3 (page 126) describes the schematic

    diagram of this model.

  • 7/28/2019 W2 L2 Air Pollution Concentration Models

    16/40

    The Gaussian Plume Idea

    Origin of coordinatesystem is the base of

    stack.

    X axis aligned in the

    downwind direction. Plume rises, then

    levels off to travel in

    the x-direction, and

    spreads in y and z

    directions.

  • 7/28/2019 W2 L2 Air Pollution Concentration Models

    17/40

    Gaussian dispersion - describes the transport and diffusion of a

    gas (or particle) from a source to a receptor according to stability

    class and other parameterized characteristics of the atmosphere.

    17

  • 7/28/2019 W2 L2 Air Pollution Concentration Models

    18/40

    Dispersion Models:

    Point Source Gaussian Plume Model

    18

  • 7/28/2019 W2 L2 Air Pollution Concentration Models

    19/40

    Effective Stack Height

    Plumes normally rise upwards

    first because they are normally

    emitted at higher T than atm T

    and with a vertical velocity. H is the effective stack height.

    H is the sum of physical stack

    height and plume rise.

    19

    H = h + h

  • 7/28/2019 W2 L2 Air Pollution Concentration Models

    20/40

    2-D STEADY DISPERSION MODEL

    Solution for windspeed of u m/s and continuous release of

    Q g/s of pollutant at : x = y = 0 (stack location) andz = H (the effective stack height)

    H = h +h

    h : physical stack height,

    h : plume rise due to buoyancy

    6.27)(eqn2

    )(2

    exp2 2

    2

    2

    2

    zyzy

    HzyuQc

  • 7/28/2019 W2 L2 Air Pollution Concentration Models

    21/40

    Example 6.4

    A factory emits 20 g/s of SO2 at height H. The

    wind speed is 3 m/s. At a distance of 1 km

    downwind, the values ofy and z are 30 m

    and 20 m, respectively. What are the SO2 concat the centreline of the plume, and at a point

    60 m to the side of and 20 m below the

    centreline?

    21

  • 7/28/2019 W2 L2 Air Pollution Concentration Models

    22/40

    Horizontal & Vertical dispersion

    coefficients, y and z

    To use the Gaussian plume eqn, need to have

    y and z values.

    These can be obtained from Fig 6.7 & 6.8

    22

  • 7/28/2019 W2 L2 Air Pollution Concentration Models

    23/40

    Horizontal dispersion

    coefficient

  • 7/28/2019 W2 L2 Air Pollution Concentration Models

    24/40

    Vertical dispersion

    coefficient

  • 7/28/2019 W2 L2 Air Pollution Concentration Models

    25/40

    Example 6.5

    Estimate the values ofy and z at a point 0.5

    km downwind from pollutant source on a

    bright summer day with a wind speed greater

    than 6 m/s.

    25

  • 7/28/2019 W2 L2 Air Pollution Concentration Models

    26/40

    Pasquill Stability Classes

    Table 3-1 Wark,

    Warner & Davis

    Table 6-1 de Nevers

  • 7/28/2019 W2 L2 Air Pollution Concentration Models

    27/40

    Stack Design

    Meteorological data are necessary for

    expressing dispersion equations

    For optimum stack design local variables

    must be considered

    Local variables

    Mechanical turbulence from nearby buildings

    Irregular terrain

    Using different criteria for short-term releases,

    explosions, for instantaneous release of

    nuclear fission products28

  • 7/28/2019 W2 L2 Air Pollution Concentration Models

    28/40

    29

    102.681.5 3-

    s

    ass

    T

    TTPD

    u

    DVh

  • 7/28/2019 W2 L2 Air Pollution Concentration Models

    29/40

    Hollands equation and Davidson &

    Bryant

    Where h = rise of plume above the stack, m

    = stack gas velocity, m/s

    d = inside stack diameter, m

    u = wind speed, m/s

    p = atmospheric pressure, millibarsT = stack gas temperature minus air

    temperature, K (Ts Tair)

    Ts = stack gas temperature, K

    H = h + h

    30

  • 7/28/2019 W2 L2 Air Pollution Concentration Models

    30/40

    Davidson & Bryant

    Not a very reliable eqn.

    Where h = rise of plume above the stack, m

    = stack gas velocity, m/s

    d = inside stack diameter, m

    u = wind speed, m/s

    T = stack gas temperature minus air

    temperature, K (Ts Tair)

    Ts = stack gas temperature, K

    31

  • 7/28/2019 W2 L2 Air Pollution Concentration Models

    31/40

    32

  • 7/28/2019 W2 L2 Air Pollution Concentration Models

    32/40

    Plume Rise Example 6.9

    Estimate the plume rise for a 3 m diameter

    stack whose exit gas has a velocity of 20 m/s

    when the wind velocity is 2 m/s, P = 1 atm

    (1013 milibars) , Ts = 100C, Ta = 15C.

    33

  • 7/28/2019 W2 L2 Air Pollution Concentration Models

    33/40

  • 7/28/2019 W2 L2 Air Pollution Concentration Models

    34/40

    DISPERSION COEFFICIENTS

    Ky and Kz approximately proportional to wind speedKy/u and Kz/u approximately constant

    y and z should vary approximately with x(1/2)

    Field observations show more complex variation (Figures6.7 and 6.8 de Nevers)

    Wind speed and solar flux combine to give stability classes

    A - F (Table 6.1 de Nevers)

    zzK x

    u 2y

    yK xu

    2

    St bilit Cl

  • 7/28/2019 W2 L2 Air Pollution Concentration Models

    35/40

    Stability Classes

    Table 3-1 Wark,

    Warner & Davis

    Table 6-1 de Nevers

  • 7/28/2019 W2 L2 Air Pollution Concentration Models

    36/40

    Maximum Ground Level

    Concentration

    Maximum ground level conc occurs when z =

    0.707H, provided z/y are constant with

    downwind distancex

    (Source: Meteorological Aspects of Air Pollution,

    Air Pollution Training Program, U.S. Dept.

    H.E.W. Division of Air Pollution, Cincinatti,

    Ohio. 1962.)

    38

  • 7/28/2019 W2 L2 Air Pollution Concentration Models

    37/40

    Ground level burning

    If the effective stack height is zero,

    zyu

    Qc

    2

  • 7/28/2019 W2 L2 Air Pollution Concentration Models

    38/40

    Other topics

    Building wakes

    Aerodynamic downwash (Mountainous areas)

    Transport distances

    Initial dispersion

    EPA recommended models: Includes manyfactors into the basic plume model.

  • 7/28/2019 W2 L2 Air Pollution Concentration Models

    39/40

    43

  • 7/28/2019 W2 L2 Air Pollution Concentration Models

    40/40

    44