W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein...

44
WHO GIVES A TWEET? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL Georgia Institute of Technology

Transcript of W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein...

Page 1: W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL.

WHO GIVES A TWEET?Evaluating Microblog Content Value

Paul André@paulesque

Michael

BernsteinKurt Luther

Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton

MIT CSAILGeorgia Institute of Technology

Page 2: W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL.
Page 3: W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL.
Page 4: W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL.
Page 5: W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL.
Page 6: W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL.
Page 7: W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL.

?

Page 8: W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL.

?

What content is valued, and why?

Page 9: W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL.

?

What content is valued, and why?

1. design implications

2. emerging norms and practice

Page 10: W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL.

DESIGN

Who Gives a Tweet?anonymous feedback from followers and strangers

(analysis of follower ratings only)

Page 11: W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL.

DESIGN

anticipated reciprocity

Who Gives a Tweet?anonymous feedback from followers and strangers

rate tweets(provide us data)

receive value in return(ratings from followers)

Page 12: W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL.

DESIGN

wgat_user:

username:

Page 13: W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL.

RECRUITMENT

Page 14: W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL.

RECRUITMENT

Page 15: W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL.

RECRUITMENT

Page 16: W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL.

1,443 users

rated 43,738 tweets

from 21,014 Twitter

accounts

Page 17: W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL.

entire dataset

RESULTS

36% Worth Reading39% Neutral

25% Not Worth

Reading

41% Worth Reading

average

user

Page 18: W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL.

What content is valued,and why?

Page 19: W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL.

What content is valued,and why?

1. categories

2. reasons why

Page 20: W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL.

What content is valued,and why?

4,220 tweets

Ground truth +

CrowdFlowerCohen’s Kappa: 0.62

Category labelsmore Information Sharing (49% vs 22%)

less Me Now (10% vs 40%)

+ inclusion of organizations

compared to random sample in Naaman

(2010)

Page 21: W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL.

RESULTS: CategoriesPredictor

Question to Followers

Information Sharing

Self-Promotion

Random Thought

Opinion / Complaint

Me Now

Conversation

Presence Maintenance

Page 22: W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL.

RESULTS: CategoriesPredictor

Question to Followers

Information Sharing

Self-Promotion

Random Thought

Opinion / Complaint

Me Now

Conversation

Presence Maintenance

“gud morning twits”

20%liked

45%disliked

Page 23: W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL.

RESULTS: CategoriesPredictor

Question to Followers

Information Sharing

Self-Promotion

Random Thought

Opinion / Complaint

Me Now

Conversation

Presence Maintenance

Odds Ratio

2.83

2.69

2.69

2.47

2.05

1.89

1.57

N/A

“gud morning twits”

20%liked

45%disliked

*p<.01˘trend p=.05

Page 24: W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL.

Odds Ratio

2.83

2.69

2.69

2.47

2.05

1.89

1.57

N/A

RESULTS: CategoriesPredictor

Question to Followers

Information Sharing

Self-Promotion

Random Thought

Opinion / Complaint

Me Now

Conversation

Presence Maintenance

“What'd they say?? @adam807 Dreamed I went to an @waitwait taping and they had to stop because a guest made @petersagal cry.”24%liked

34%disliked

*p<.01˘trend p=.05

Page 25: W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL.

Odds Ratio

2.83

2.69

2.69

2.47

2.05

1.89˘

1.57

N/A

RESULTS: CategoriesPredictor

Question to Followers

Information Sharing

Self-Promotion

Random Thought

Opinion / Complaint

Me Now

Conversation

Presence Maintenance

“tired and upset”

27%liked

25%disliked

*p<.01˘trend p=.05

Page 26: W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL.

Odds Ratio

2.83*

2.69*

2.69*

2.47*

2.05˘

1.89˘

1.57

N/A

RESULTS: CategoriesPredictor

Question to Followers

Information Sharing

Self-Promotion

Random Thought

Opinion / Complaint

Me Now

Conversation

Presence Maintenance

*p<.01˘trend p=.05

Page 27: W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL.

Odds Ratio

2.83*

2.69*

2.69*

2.47*

2.05˘

1.89˘

1.57

N/A

RESULTS: CategoriesPredictor

Question to Followers

Information Sharing

Self-Promotion

Random Thought

Opinion / Complaint

Me Now

Conversation

Presence Maintenance

*p<.01˘trend p=.05

Page 28: W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL.

Odds Ratio

2.83*

2.69*

2.69*

2.47*

2.05˘

1.89˘

1.57

N/A

RESULTS: CategoriesPredictor

Question to Followers

Information Sharing

Self-Promotion

Random Thought

Opinion / Complaint

Me Now

Conversation

Presence Maintenance

*p<.01˘trend p=.05

Page 29: W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL.

Not Worth Reading

RESULTS: Reasons

Page 30: W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL.

Not Worth Reading

Old News “Yes, I saw that first thing this

morning.”

“Since your followers read the

NYT too, reposting NYT URLs

is tricky unless you add

something.”

No Personal Touch

Conversations “Twitter’s fault; feels like

listening in on a private

conversation”

RESULTS: Reasons

Page 31: W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL.

Not Worth Reading

Banal or ProsaicTweets

“…and so what?”

“Just links are the worst thing in

the world.”

Lack of Context

Professional vs Personal Insight

“I unfollowed you for this tweet. I

don’t know you; I followed you b/c

of you job.”No Curiosity “All the news I need is here. Not

much of a tease.”

RESULTS: Reasons

Page 32: W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL.

Worth Reading

RESULTS: Reasons

Page 33: W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL.

Worth Reading

Valued Information

“interesting perspective on

something I know nothing about.”

“makes you want to know more.”Appealing Description

Conciseness “few words to say much, very

clear.”Human “personal, honest, and

transparent.”

RESULTS: Reasons

Page 34: W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL.

Embed more context in tweets (be less

cryptic)

Add extra commentary, especially if

RTing

Use twitter-specific mechanisms

(hashtags, @mentions, and DMs)

appropriately

Unique hashtag for questions is

valued

Conciseness, even with 140 chars,

valued

Happy sentiments valued; whining

disliked

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Page 35: W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL.

Exploring different communities on Twitter

Which results generalize

Rate author, not tweet

Users no longer followed

Self-ratings

Twitter as maintaining awareness and

relationships

LIMITATIONS

FUTURE WORK

Page 36: W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL.

DISCUSSION

Utilizing

results:

Twitter’s simplicity vs. Facebook’s newsfeed complexity

Presentation:

Technological intervention:

design tools to learn, filter, re-present

Social intervention:

inform users of perceived value and

reaction

Page 37: W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL.

Social media

sites: but also new questions of

content value and accepted practice

new connection opportunities

Design sites to elicit more subtle reactions

Sample of 1,400 users and 43,000 ratings:

CONCLUSIONS

41% of feed worth reading

Information Sharing liked / Me Now

disliked

Reasons: context, commentary,

conciseness, …

Technological and social interventions

Page 38: W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL.

Social media

sites: but also new questions of

content value and accepted practice

new connection opportunities

Design sites to elicit more subtle reactions

Sample of 1,400 users and 43,000 ratings:

41% of feed worth reading

Information Sharing liked / Me Now

disliked

Reasons: context, commentary,

conciseness, …

Technological and social interventionsCONCLUSIONSCONCLUSIONSCONCLUSIONSThanks for listening!with thanks to Ed Cutrell, Robert Kraut, m.c. schraefel, Ryen White, Sarita Yardi, HCII Social Comp. group and anonymous reviewers

Paul André – CMU HCIIMichael Bernstein – MIT CSAILKurt Luther – Georgia Tech GVU

Page 39: W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL.

RESULTSCategoriesPredictor Odds

Ratioz value

Question to Followers 2.83 2.94*

Information Sharing 2.69 3.05*

Self-Promotion 2.69 2.61*

Random Thought 2.47 2.89*

Opinion / Complaint 2.05 1.93˘

Me Now 1.89 1.94˘

Conversation 1.57 1.26

Presence Maintenance N/A N/A

Page 40: W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL.

RESULTSCategoriesQuestion to Followers

Information Sharing

Self-Promotion

Random Thought

Opinion / Complaint

Me Now

Conversation

Presence Maintenance

47% chance of being Worth Reading

“This is a good use of Twitter.”

“Gives one pause to think about the question posted.”

Questions to Followers

Page 41: W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL.

RESULTSCategoriesQuestion to Followers

Information Sharing

Self-Promotion

Random Thought

Opinion / Complaint

Me Now

Conversation

Presence Maintenance

“The headline arouses my curiosity.”

“Wow. Didn’t know that was happening. Thanks for informing me.”

Information Sharing

Page 42: W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL.

RESULTSCategoriesQuestion to Followers

Information Sharing

Self-Promotion

Random Thought

Opinion / Complaint

Me Now

Conversation

Presence Maintenance

22% chance of being Worth Reading

“Sorry, but I don’t care what people are eating.”

“Too much personal info.”

“He moans about this ALL THE TIME. Seriously.”

Me Now

Page 43: W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL.

RESULTSCategoriesQuestion to Followers

Information Sharing

Self-Promotion

Random Thought

Opinion / Complaint

Me Now

Conversation

Presence Maintenance

Me Now “Foursquare updates don’t need to be

shared on Twitter unless there’s a

relevant update to be made.”

“4sq, ffs.”

Page 44: W HO G IVES A T WEET ? Evaluating Microblog Content Value Paul André @paulesque Michael Bernstein Kurt Luther Carnegie Mellon & Uni. Southampton MIT CSAIL.

RECRUITMENT