VVEMS 2009 Protocol Revisions, Recap & Rationale
description
Transcript of VVEMS 2009 Protocol Revisions, Recap & Rationale
VVEMS Writing GroupPresented by Todd Lang, MD
Moved some items to appendices Not a textbook, but full of information More of a philosophical statement on
purpose of guidelines Discusses uniquities of VVEMS Reader expected to be familiar with
state and national requirements
Interfacility transport guideline Sedona/VVMC transport guideline Air transport guideline
To save time for both parties Name the type of call up front Patch: please listen and give us
guidance Notification: patient is stable and we
don’t request any orders, please direct us to a bed and be prepared for us
We will work with nursing to help them focus attention on Patch calls more tightly
Functioning, dependable EMS Committees Prehospital Care: Most months. Everyday EMS
policy and related matters for the practicing EMS provider and addressing issues at the interface of EMS service and other services.
Steering: Chiefs, EMS leaders, NAH/VVMC leadership. Meets quarterly or PRN
Peer Review: Bimonthly. A forum to analyze and improve care rendered and offer constructive criticism on care and recordkeeping. Generates useful policy/guideline revisions.
Has been running smoothly now for some time
Initial growing pains seem to have passed
Fine tuning the labeling: need to put patient labels over the MFR labels on the tubes
Legal blood draws not required unless blood already being drawn for medical care.
Necessary as volume grows Empowers individual agencies Allows focused QA from medical
direction and makes more time available for integrative, system-wide data analysis
Allowed but not endorsed strongly by local medical direction
Consider use early in codes Use after 2 attempts or 90 seconds in
critically ill Costly but safe Tibial sites preferred over humeral
PICC line access Portacath access Increase number of people who can
get treated while decreasing pain and risk to EMS
These are the sickest patients and hardest IV starts
0.1 mg/kg for adults 0.05 mg/kg for older (over 55) and
peds Repeat in 10 min Mirrors our “Protocol M” in ED Effective and safe dose
An option for life threatening bleeding
May use proprietary device or bp cuff
Rosetta Lido not a treatment for ischemia Iodine and shellfish do not cross react
with contrast dye and were removed from pretreatment for dye allergy
CCR Amiodarone removed from protocols
NAH/VVMC purchased to help improve MI care in VV
Mostly working now Improved technology over fax-based
transmission Helps to bypass the ED in STEMI care
when possible
State wide registry which will analyze cardiac arrest and survival
Expect great research Nationally recognized program Part of CCR initiative
Early-middle adoption At request of agencies and leaders Hopefully will improve outcomes Unlikely to make things worse
CPAP added Methylprednisolone by patch order Furosemide by patch order, dose
guideline (double) Continuous nebs for severe
bronchospasm
Lifesaving Safe Strongly endorsed by Medical
Direction Costly, but manageable, expense Should decrease need for invasive
airways
Consider RSI for airway burns Minimize airway manipulation unless
RSI available for neuro trauma in field Cervical Spine Immobilization
program
Naloxone dose for altered patient is 0.4 mg IV
Naloxone dose for unconscious or unstable is 2 mg IV/IM
No NG or charcoal in ALOC OD patient
Charcoal only if ingestion <60 min Diazepam OK for EMT-I in seizures
CCR success Cardiac Arrest Center/Cooling
survivors Fine tuning of C-spine protocol Focused RN training in 09 Continued Medical Director Ride Time Annual Training like this? Participation and Integration of
Medical Direction into EMD process