[Vu Van Nguyen] Test Estimation in Practice
-
Upload
ho-chi-minh-city-software-testing-club -
Category
Software
-
view
564 -
download
1
description
Transcript of [Vu Van Nguyen] Test Estimation in Practice
Test Estimation in Practice
STC JULY 2014
VU NGUYEN
Faculty of Information Technology University of Science, VNU-HCMC
Agenda
• Background and Motivation
• qEstimation Process
– Test Size Estimation
– Test Effort Estimation
• Conclusion
2
Background
• Software estimation – process of determining cost, time, staff, and other attributes
of software projects
• Estimation is important for success or failure of projects
• Methods and Metrics – Source Lines of Code (SLOC)
– Function Points
– Use Case Points
– Story Points
– COCOMO
– Expert Judgment
3
Motivation
• Testing accounts for up to 50% of project effort [1]
• Current problems
– estimates done for the whole project rather than testing specific
– lack of reliable methods designed for estimating software testing
• Our aim
– Introducing qEstimation for estimating size and effort of testing projects
4
Agenda
• Background and Motivation
• qEstimation Process
– Test Size Estimation
– Test Effort Estimation
• Conclusion
5
Test Case
qEstimation Process
6
Test Case Count TCPs of all Test
Cases
Estimate Testing Effort
Parameters
Counted Size
Estimated Effort
[Test Cycle i]
Test Cycle Size Actual Effort
Effort by Activity
…. …. …. ….
Test cycle i …. …. ….
…. …. …. ….
Historical Data of this Project
Update Historical
Data
Calibrate Estimation
Model
Estimate size and effort of different test cycles of a same project:
qEstimation Principles
• Size measures complexity of each test cycle
• Test case’s complexity is based on – Number of checkpoints
– Complexity of test setup or precondition
– Complexity of test data
• Test Case Point (TCP) is used as size unit
• Model refinement (calibration) is key to estimating effort – based on previous cycles of the current project or
similar projects
7
Count Size of Test Cycle
• Size of a test cycle: total TCPs of all test cases to be executed in that test cycle
• Steps:
8
Test Case
Count Checkpoints
Determine Set Up Complexity
Determine Test Data Complexity
Adjust based on Test Type (optional)
Unadjusted TCPs
TCPs
Count Size of Test Cycle - 2
• Checkpoints
– Checkpoint is the condition in which the tester verifies whether the result produced by the target function matches the expected criterion
– One test case consists of one or many checkpoints
9
One checkpoint is counted as one TCP
Count Size of Test Cycle - 3
• Test Setup or Precondition – Test setup specifies the condition to execute the test case
• Include setup steps to prepare environment for testing
– Four levels of Test Setup complexity • Each is assigned a number of TCPs
10
Number of TCP(*)
Complexity Level
Description
0 None • The set up is not applicable or important to execute the test case • Or, the set up is just reused from the previous test case to continue the current test case
1 Low • The condition for executing the test case is available with some simple modifications required • Or, some simple set-up steps are needed
3 Medium • Some explicit preparation is needed to execute the test case • Or, The condition for executing is available with some additional modifications required • Or, some additional set-up steps are needed
5 High • Heavy hardware and/or software configurations are needed to execute the test case
Count Size of Test Cycle - 4
• Test Data – Test Data is used to execute the test case
• It can be generated at the test case execution time, sourced from previous tests, or generated by test scripts
– Four levels of Test Data complexity • Each is assigned a number of TCPs
Number of TCP (*)
Complexity Level
Description
0 None • No test data preparation is needed
1 Low • Simple test data is needed and can be created during the test case execution time • Or, the test case uses a slightly modified version of existing test data and requires
little or no effort to modify the test data
3 Medium • Test data is deliberately prepared in advance with extra effort to ensure its completeness, comprehensiveness, and consistency
6 High • Test data is prepared in advance with considerable effort to ensure its completeness, comprehensiveness, and consistency
• This could include using support tools to generate data and a database to store and manage test data
• Scripts may be required to generate test data
Count Size of Test Cycle - 5
• Adjust TCPs based on Type of Test – This is an OPTIONAL step
– Adjustment is based on types of test cases
• Each type of test case is assigned a weight
• Adjusted TCP of the test case = Counted TCP x Weight(*)
12
Agenda
• Background and Motivation
• qEstimation Process
– Test Size Estimation
– Test Effort Estimation
• Conclusion
13
Estimate Effort of Test Cycle
• Overview
– Two estimation methods • Based on Test Velocity
• Regression analysis of Size and Effort of completed test cycles
– Effort distributed by activity • Test Planning
• Test Analysis and Design
• Test Execution
• Test Tracking and Reporting
14
Each of these activities may be performed multiple times
Estimate Effort of Test Cycle - 2
• Estimate Effort based on Test Velocity
Effort(person-hour) = Size(TCP) / Test Velocity(TCP per person-hour)
– Test Velocity is measured as TCP/person-hour
• Test Velocity is dependent on project
• It should be calculated based on data from completed test cycles of the same project.
15
Estimate Effort of Test Cycle - 3
• Estimate effort using Linear Regression Analysis – Find out the equation of effort and size using similar
completed test cycles of a project
16
y = 0.0729x + 1.6408
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
Eff
ort
(P
M)
Adjusted TCP
Equation of Size and Effort
The data analysis tool like Excel can be used to find out the equation
Calibrate qEstimation
• Calibration: a process adjusting parameters for a model using historical data or experiences
• With qEstimation, you can calibrate:
(1) TCP assigned to each complexity level of Test Setup
(2) TCP assigned to each complexity level of Test Data
(3) Test Velocity
(4) Effort distribution
(5) Weights of test case types
• Process can be done with the help of tools
17
18
Tool Demo
Conclusion
• qEstimation is an agile approach to estimating tests – Estimate Size in TCP by measuring the complexity
of test cases
– Estimate Effort using Test Velocity or Regression
– An Excel toolkit to simplify the approach
• Advantages – Easy to implement
– Reflecting real complexity of test cases
– Independent with the level of details of test cases
– Useful for estimating testing effort
19
References
• [1] Y. Yang, Q. Li, M. Li, Q. Wang, An empirical analysis on distribution patterns of software maintenance effort, International Conference on Software Maintenance, 2008, pp. 456-459
• [2] N. Patel, M. Govindrajan, S. Maharana, S. Ramdas, “Test Case Point Analysis”, Cognizant Technology Solutions, White Paper, 2001
• [3] QASymphony: www.qasymphony.com
• [4] Vu Nguyen, Vu Pham, and Vu Lam. “qEstimation: a process for estimating size and effort of software testing.” Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Software and System Process. ACM, 2013
© 2014 HCMC Software Testing Club
Thank You